VZCZCXRO7528
RR RUEHDBU RUEHLN RUEHSK RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHYE #0064/01 0361314
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 051314Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY YEREVAN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0007
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC
INFO RUCNCIS/CIS COLLECTIVE
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0001

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 YEREVAN 000064 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EUR, DRL, DOL/ILAB FOR LEYLA STROTKAMP, RACHEL RIGBY AND 
TINA MCCARTER AND DRL/ILCSR FOR SARAH MORGAN ANG G/TIP FOR LUIS 
CDEBACA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB EIND ETRD PHUM SOCI AM
SUBJECT: 2009 INFORMATION ON ARMENIA'S CHILD LABOR PRACTICES 
 
REF: A) 09 SECSTATE 131997 
     B) 09 YEREVAN 41 
     C) 09 YEREVAN 246 
     D) 09 YEREVAN 135 
     E) 09 YEREVAN 263 
 
------- 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
¶1. (U) This message represents Embassy Yerevan's response to DOL's 
information request on child labor practices and forced child labor 
in Armenia in 2009 (ref A).  The cable includes information on both 
tasks: Task 1 (1/TVPRA) - information request on the use of forced 
labor and/or exploitive child labor in the production of goods; and 
Task 2 (2/TDA) - request for additional information on exploitive 
child labor for countries eligible for trade benefits under the 
Generalized System of Preferences and other trade programs. 
 
------------------- 
RESPONSE TO 1/TVPRA 
------------------- 
 
¶2. (U) As in the previous year (ref C) there have been no reports of 
exploitation of children in the production of goods in Armenia.  In 
general, the country has a relatively small child labor problem, and 
over the past year there have been limited reports of forced labor, 
none of which related to production of goods, however. 
 
¶3. (U) According to local observers, many children, especially those 
residing in the rural regions, were involved in family 
businesses--mainly agriculture--as a result of the severe 
socioeconomic plights of their families.  The agricultural works 
included working in the fields, collecting the harvest, and selling 
the products either in local markets or in rural areas after school 
hours.  Observers also reported seeing children in Yerevan selling 
flowers, drawings and working in local markets after school hours. 
 
¶4. (U) Due to limited research in the area in general, information 
on the specific agricultural products where child labor occurs is 
not available.  None of the interlocutors interviewed, however, 
reported a problem of exploitative or forced child labor used in the 
cultivation of a certain agricultural product. 
 
¶5. (U) In October 2008 UNICEF published the results of a nationwide 
survey on child labor (ref B).  According to the study less than 5 
percent of children between 7 and 18 had paying jobs, not counting 
those involved in family farms or businesses.  The survey also found 
that almost one-third of working children were below the legal 
working age; that almost all children worked without legal 
contracts; and that some children were employed in heavy manual work 
as laborers and loaders. The survey did not find any information on 
the involvement of children in the production of goods. 
 
¶6. (U) Similarly, there have been no reports of forced labor of 
adults in the production of goods.  During the year there have been 
anecdotal reports of exploitative labor practices exacerbated by the 
severe financial crisis; however, these referred to the sphere of 
service provision and not the production of goods. 
 
¶7. (U) The National Statistical Survey with the financial and expert 
support of the International Labor Organization is currently 
summarizing the results of a Household Survey on Migration and 
Forced Labor that was conducted between July and December 2009.  The 
focus of the report is the exploitation of Armenian migrants abroad. 
 Post will forward it to DOL as soon as it becomes available. 
 
----------------- 
RESPONSE TO 2/TDA 
----------------- 
 
¶8. (SBU) The following information updates previously reported 
material provided in ref B and is keyed to the information request 
in Paragraph 21 of ref A. 
 
 
2A) PREVALENCE AND SECTORAL DISTRIBUTION OF EXPLOITIVE CHILD LABOR: 
 
 
-- There have been no changes with respect to child labor or worst 
forms of child labor in Armenia during the reporting period.  The 
general view by local experts continues to be that while exploitive 
child labor is not a significant problem in the country, the 
government still does not take sufficient actions to address its 
small prevalence and does not take action to develop a more informed 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  002 OF 008 
 
 
understanding of the issue. 
 
-- The known areas were children mainly work include family-run 
businesses and farms, and to a lesser degree car, washes and 
maintenance, construction, and market places.  There were a few 
instances of forced child labor reported during the year (please see 
below for details). 
 
-- The 2004 survey by the National Statistical Service and the 2008 
UNICEF mandated survey (ref B) continue to be the only relatively 
comprehensive surveys on the issue conducted in recent years. 
 
-- The Armenian Association of Social Workers, with the support of 
the Children Support Center Foundation (CSCF), is currently 
summarizing the results of a survey sponsored by the Czech 
organization People in Need which is aimed at ascertaining the 
awareness and susceptibility of children to trafficking risks.  The 
survey was conducted from October to December 2009 and included 
quantitative research with 1200 households and more in-depth 
research with 800 children.  According to Mira Antonian, the head of 
the CSCF, the report on the survey will include information on 
approximately 18 "suspicious" cases of child exploitation that came 
to light during the interviews; these cases reportedly included 
child exploitation in agriculture, sexual exploitation, inducing to 
beggary, etc.  Post will e-mail to DOL the final survey once it 
becomes available. 
 
-- In 2009 UNICEF supported the Ministry of Territorial 
Administration and the National Statistical Service on conducting a 
survey to reveal the impact of the the ongoing international 
financial crisis on children.  One of the questions of the survey 
will answer whether there has been an increase in the number of 
working children.  UNICEF expects to have the results sometime in 
February, 2010. (Note: Post does not have major expectations from 
this particular report, because the numbers will reflect only the 
officially registered contracts with minors, while we know that the 
majority of working children are unregistered.  In all cases we will 
send to DOL a copy of the report as soon as it becomes available. 
End Note.) 
 
 
2B) LAWS AND REGULATIONS: 
 
 
-- On November 18, 2009 Armenia's National Assembly (parliament) 
amended the trafficking articles of the Criminal Code: 
 
Article 132 - Recruitment, transportation, transfer, harboring or 
receipt of persons with the aim of exploitation; 
 
Article 132-1 - Engagement of other persons in prostitution or other 
forms of sexual exploitation, forced labor or services, or slavery 
or practices similar to slavery. 
 
The changes further stiffened the punishments for trafficking 
crimes, including for trafficking of children.  President Serzh 
Sargsian signed the changes into law on December 12, 2009, which 
then took effect on January 2, 2010. 
 
-- Article 132-1 envisaged stiffer punishments for trafficking, and 
the new changes in Article 132 increased the prison terms to match 
those of Article 132-1.  Hence, according to the changes in Article 
132, the minimum punishment increased from 3-6 years of imprisonment 
to 5-10 years; the punishment for trafficking of minors (as one of 
the aggravating factors) increased from 7-10 years of imprisonment 
to 7-12 years. 
 
-- Also the changes introduced the option of confiscation of 
traffickers' property in case of both of the trafficking statutes. 
Finally the changes also provided for exemption from criminal 
prosecution of victims of trafficking for those crimes they were 
forced to commit, as conditioned by their situation, and in cases 
where the victims supported the investigation of these crimes. 
 
-- Hence, Armenia's Criminal Code currently proscribes trafficking 
in persons and considers child trafficking as an aggravating 
circumstance, which is punishable from 7 to 12 years imprisonment. 
In case of additional aggravating circumstances, prison terms may 
reach 15 years.  (Note: Post will e-mail to DOL the updated 
translations of the two trafficking articles.  End note.) 
 
-- There have been no other changes in legislation with respect to 
child labor/employment in 2009. (Note: In addition the Criminal Code 
changes mentioned above, the anti-trafficking inter-agency working 
group is still in the process of working on a larger package of 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  003 OF 008 
 
 
changes in the Criminal Code to address on a more comprehensive 
level all aspects of trafficking, including that of children.  End 
Note.) 
 
-- In late 2009 the GOAM, after a significant delay, presented to 
the International Labor Organization its first reports on the 
implementation of the ILO Conventions 138 and 182.  The reports 
mainly presented the existing legal framework on child labor and 
child labor exploitation, and once ILO reviews them in 2010, it will 
give its evaluation of compliance of the legislation with ILO norms 
and standards. (Note: Post will forward to DOL the English copies of 
the reports as soon as they become available.  End Note.) 
 
-- In December 2008 Armenia's Human Rights Defender (ombudsman) 
released an ad hoc report on some legal gaps existing in the 
Armenian legislation relating to children, including legislation 
relating to registration of child's birth, citizenship, family and 
education rights, right to work, etc.  The English version of the 
report is located at the ombdusman's website and can be found via 
the following link: http://www.ombuds.am/main/en/10/31/0/4/. 
 
-- According to UNICEF child protection officer Hayk Khemchian, the 
existing laws are adequate and sufficient to address the problem of 
exploitive child labor; however, they lack proper enforcement. 
 
-- The beggary case mentioned below, as well as many other 
trafficking cases that resulted in stringent punishments during 
2009, are a very effective deterrent against similar criminal 
practices, especially given the government's pro-active efforts to 
publicize the convictions through local media outlets (ref E). 
 
 
2C) INSTITUTIONS AND MECHANISMS FOR ENFORCEMENT: 
 
 
SECTION I: HAZARDOUS CHILD LABOR 
 
-- (1) The State Labor Inspectorate (SLI) is the primary agency 
responsible for discovering and prosecuting instances of Hazardous 
Child Labor, even though other agencies, such as the police, Child 
Protection Units (CPU) at regional governors' offices and the 
Yerevan Municipality, the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs, the 
Ministry of Education and the Community Boards on Guardianships have 
various responsibilities towards the protection of children's 
rights. 
 
-- (2) In 2005 a national inter-agency committee was formed for the 
protection of children's rights (by Government decree 835-N).  It is 
headed by the Minister of Labor and Social Affairs, and other 
relevant agencies are represented in the committee at the level of 
deputy ministers and chiefs of departments.  This body, however, 
basically exists on paper only, and is very inefficient, according 
to many local observers. 
 
-- (3) There is not a specific mechanism for registering complaints 
about hazardous child labor violations.  While revealing such kind 
of violations is part of the SLI mandate, the SLI has never received 
a single complaint of child exploitation since its establishment in 
2005, nor has it discovered such violations through inspections. 
 
-- (4) The SLI does not receive specific funding for revealing 
hazardous child labor violations, since this is part of their 
mandate. 
 
-- (5) The SLI does not have inspectors specialized in child labor 
issues, and they have only a total of 140-150 labor inspectors who 
cover the entire country.  According to Varazdat Danielyan, the Head 
of the Legal Oversight Department of the SLI, the number is woefully 
insufficient for the SLI to conduct pro-active inspections on 
revealing child exploitation violations.  To illustrate the severe 
shortage of staff and resources, Danielyan cited the following 
statistics: from their establishment, the SLI has managed to conduct 
approximately 15,000 inspections in about 8,000 registered entities, 
while the total number of registered business entities is about 
124,000.  According to UNICEF the SLI does not need specialized 
inspectors to reveal child labor; if they implement their mandate 
properly, that alone will suffice. 
 
-- (6) There were no child labor inspections carried out in 2009 or 
before. 
 
-- (7-12) Questions 7 through 12 are not applicable, given the 
situation described in the answers above. 
 
-- (13) The experience regarding questions 7 through 10 did not 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  004 OF 008 
 
 
reflect a commitment to combat exploitive child labor.  The GOAM 
does not consider that hazardous child labor is a significant 
problem.  Local observers (e.g. CSCF, UNICEF, Hope and Help, 
Democracy Today NGO and others) consider that child labor in general 
exists but consider that the true scale of the problem is unknown 
and as such requires in-depth research.  These observers can point 
out only to anecdotal cases of hazardous child labor (or forced 
child labor, or other worst forms of child exploitation); however, 
they consider that the GOAM does not proactively examine the field 
to factually estimate the true scale of the problem (whether big or 
small) and does not render sufficient assistance in the few cases 
that have become known.  Most interlocutors considered that neither 
the State Labor Inspectorate, nor the regional Child Protection 
Units were properly staffed, skilled, willing or motivated to 
proactively work on the issue of protecting children from labor 
exploitation. 
 
-- (14) The Government did not offer any special training on child 
labor issues to SLI inspectors. 
 
 
SECTION II: FORCED CHILD LABOR 
 
-- (1) Since forced labor (both of children and adults) is 
proscribed by the Criminal Code trafficking articles (see above), 
the police and other law enforcement agencies are responsible for 
the enforcement of laws relating to forced child labor. 
 
-- (2) There are two governmental bodies that are in charge of 
trafficking issues, and both were highly effective and met regularly 
throughout the year to exchange information and make decisions both 
on the practical and policy levels.  The higher level body is the 
ministerial level Council to Combat Human Trafficking that is 
chaired by the Deputy Prime Minister, and the lower chain is the 
inter-agency working group chaired by the head of the International 
Organizations Department at the Foreign Ministry.  (Note: Please 
refer to Ref D--Post submission for Trafficking in Person Report 
2009--for additional information on the ministerial council and the 
working group.  End note.) 
 
-- (3) Since the GOAM views all instances of forced child labor as 
trafficking, which carries a criminal penalty, the law-enforcement 
bodies are in charge of investigating these cases.  The mechanism 
for reporting complaints would be filing a criminal case, or 
reporting a crime, just like in the case of any other crime. 
 
-- (4) The relevant police forces did not have a special focus or 
separate funding for investigation of forced child labor issues. 
 
-- (5) The police Anti-trafficking unit (field officers under the 
Department of Criminal Investigation) had 5 investigators.  The 
Police Unit against Human Trafficking, Drug Trafficking and 
Organized Crime (Investigatory Department) had 10 investigators 
total, who worked on trafficking cases as needed.  The regional 
investigators throughout the country also had a responsibility (but 
not a direct focus) in investigating such crimes. 
 
-- (6-12) Please refer to information on child trafficking criminal 
cases provided below under section 2D. 
 
-- (13) The government anti-trafficking record showed strong 
commitment in fighting exploitive child labor as part of 
trafficking. (Note: On December 10, the Parliament adopted the 2010 
national budget.  As in the 2009 budget, the government included 
multiple line-item allocations devoted to its anti-trafficking 
efforts.  In the 2010 budget the government allocated more money to 
trafficking victims' assistance.  The 2010 anti-trafficking 
allocations included 25,966,400 drams (about $70,000) for social and 
psychological rehabilitation of trafficking victims; 2,200,000 drams 
($6,000) for medical services for victims; 8,000,000 drams ($21,300) 
for promoting youth awareness on trafficking; 766,000 drams ($2,000) 
for general public awareness activities on trafficking; and 
12,840,000 ($34,000) for assisting orphanage graduates - counseling 
services.  End note.) 
 
-- (14) The government did not offer any specialized trainings on 
forced child labor issues. 
 
 
2D) INSTITUTIONAL MECHANISMS FOR EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT 
 
 
2D. SECTION I: CHILD TRAFFICKING 
 
-- (1) The two police units (one in the criminal investigations 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  005 OF 008 
 
 
department and the other in the investigatory department) who were 
primarily in charge of investigating trafficking crimes, also dealt 
with trafficking in children.  There were a total of 15 
investigators in these units.  According to the head of the 
Anti-Trafficking Division under the Department of Criminal 
Investigation, the number of investigators was insufficient to 
investigate all TIP crimes, although the regional subdivisions of 
the police launched and/or supported the investigations of criminal 
cases. 
 
-- (2) There was no separate funding allocated specifically for 
investigating child trafficking cases, or trafficking in general. 
The law enforcement bodies' budgets are formulated per employees and 
not per units or issues.  According to the head of the 
Anti-Trafficking Division under the Department of Criminal 
Investigation, the resources they had were insufficient. 
 
-- (3) Two local NGOs, Democracy Today (a local implement of the 
United Methodist Committee on Relief) and  Hope and Help, maintained 
anti-trafficking hotlines. They did not report receiving any 
complaints relating to child trafficking during the year.  The 
Children Support Center Foundation also maintained a hotline service 
for child protection, but they also did not receive any calls 
regarding child trafficking. 
 
-- (4) There were no new criminal cases on trafficking of children 
investigated in Armenia during 2009.  Two cases of inducing children 
into beggary (charged under the trafficking statues of the criminal 
code) were sent to the courts in 2009: 
 
-- On April 2, 2009 a Yerevan court sentenced to seven years 
imprisonment the 34-year-old Garik Hovhannisian, who was found 
guilty of periodically exploiting as beggars five boys -- ages 12 to 
15 -- between May 2007 and June 2008.  One of the boys was the son 
of Hovhannisian's common law wife, and the others were friends of 
this boy.  All of the victims attended special boarding schools 
located in Yerevan -- one of them is for children who exhibit 
socially dangerous behavior, and the other is for children with 
special health needs.  (For more details on the case please see Ref 
E). 
 
-- The second criminal case was against a former deputy director of 
a special school for children who exhibit socially dangerous 
behavior.  The trial began in July 2009 and the defendant was 
charged for sexually assaulting one of the minor boys and forcing 
into beggary two others boys. 
 
-- (5) As a result of the criminal cases a total of seven children 
were rescued.  (Note: The number is not 8 because one victim was 
exploited by the traffickers in both criminal cases.  End note). 
 
-- (6) One person was convicted (see above), the other person 
(former deputy director) was under arrest pending the trial results. 
 
 
-- (7) See above. 
 
-- (8) See above. 
 
-- (9) The sentence imposed met standards established by Armenia's 
legal framework. 
 
-- (10) The convicted person was serving his sentence. 
 
-- (11) It is hard to make out an average, due to the limited number 
of cases. 
 
-- (12) There were no training programs offered that focused 
specifically on the issue of trafficking in children.  Nevertheless, 
during the year, and with the support of international and local 
NGOs, numerous training programs were conducted on the issue of 
trafficking in general.  Also trafficking is now part of the 
curriculum of many of schools for law enforcement personnel (ref D). 
 
 
-- (13) Not applicable. 
 
(Note: According to the Police they investigated 4 cases on charges 
of sale and purchase of children. These cases mostly had to do with 
illegal practices of adoption of newborns.  One case involving 4 
children resulted in two convictions of 5 years, and 5 years and 6 
months of imprisonment.  Another case involving one child resulted 
in one conviction of a three years' suspended sentence.  Another 
case was dropped due to lack of evidence, and one more is still in 
progress.) 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  006 OF 008 
 
 
 
 
2D. SECTION II: COMMERCIAL SEXUAL EXPLOITATION OF CHILDREN 
 
-- (1) The two police units (one in the criminal investigations 
department and the other in the investigatory department) who were 
primarily in charge of investigating trafficking crimes, also dealt 
with investigation of commercial sexual exploitation of children. 
 
-- (2) There was no separate funding allocated specifically for 
investigating child trafficking cases, or trafficking in general. 
The law enforcement bodies' budgets are formulated per employees and 
not per units or issues. 
 
-- (3) UMCOR's local implementer, the Democracy Today NGO, and Hope 
and Help, maintained anti-trafficking hotlines. They did not report 
to have received any complaints relating to commercial sexual 
exploitation of children during the year.  The Children Support 
Center Foundation also maintained a hotline service for child 
protection, but they also did not receive any calls regarding child 
trafficking. 
 
-- (4) The Police reported to have investigated 4 cases under 
statues of the criminal code proscribing engagement in prostitution 
of other persons for profit and inciting to prostitution that 
engaged minor victims.  Also throughout the year, a Yerevan fist 
instance court continued to hear the case against Vladimir 
Movsisyan, who forced his (then) 17-year-old partner into 
prostitution.  The trial commenced in December 2008, and was still 
ongoing as of February 1, 2010.  The latter case was charged under 
the trafficking statues of the criminal code. 
 
-- (5) As a result 5 minors were rescued. 
 
-- (6) In addition to the case of Movsisyan (who was arrested 
pending trial results), two of the other cases resulted in three 
years' sentence each (plus one suspended sentence), and two more 
were in progress (one under investigation, one already in the 
court). 
 
-- (7) See above. 
 
-- (8) See above. 
 
-- (9) The sentence imposed met standards established by Armenia's 
legal framework. 
 
-- (10) Yes, in those case that resulted in convictions. 
 
-- (11) Data is available only for the Movsisyan case, which has 
been in progress for well over a year.  According to the Police, 
however, the other cases were resolved in a couple of months. 
 
-- (12) The government did not offer training programs on the issue 
of commercial sexual exploitation of children. 
 
-- (13) Not applicable. 
 
 
2D. SECTION III: USE OF CHILDREN IN ILLICIT ACTIVITIES 
 
-- (1) The Juvenile Division under the Police Criminal Investigation 
Department (Juvenile Police), with its regional subdivisions, was in 
charge of investigating crimes were children were engaged.  (Note: 
In general Juvenile Police is focused more on the crimes committed 
by children, rather than crimes against children.  In cases were 
children were victims of crimes, the Juvenile division forwarded 
those to other appropriate departments and referred the children to 
the Children Support Center Foundation.  In many cases when children 
were engaged in a crime, there were adults who were charged and 
prosecuted for engaging children in a criminal activity.  End note.) 
 The Juvenile Police had about 280 investigators in Yerevan and in 
all of Armenia's 10 administrative regions.  According to the head 
of the Juvenile Police Nelly Duryan, they could do much more with 
more staff, but as it was they did the best they could. 
 
-- (2) The Juvenile Division also did not receive separate funding, 
but beginning from 2000 they have carried out extensive programs 
thanks to which the number of begging children has declined from 300 
in 1997 to 15 in 200). 
 
-- (3) The Juvenile Police worked in close cooperation  with the 
Children Support Center Foundation and referred to them children who 
had become victims of crimes.  The Juvenile Police also had an 
investigator commissioned to CSCF.  The Children Support Center 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  007 OF 008 
 
 
Foundation, which maintained a hotline service for child protection, 
received and acted on two complaints about children being induced 
into robbery. 
 
-- (4) The GOAM reported to have investigated 9 criminal cases of 
use of children in illicit activities during 2009.  According to 
Nelly Duryan most of these cases had to with robbery. 
 
-- (5-11) GOAM has provided only basic data on the 9 criminal cases 
as mentioned above.  Post has requested additional information on 
the outcomes of these cases and once the information becomes 
available will forward these to DOL. 
 
-- (12) The government did not offer trainings specifically on the 
issue of use of children in illicit activities. 
 
-- (13) Not applicable. 
 
2E) GOVERNMENT POLICIES ON CHILD LABOR 
 
-- The Armenian Government's National Plan of Action (NPA) for the 
Protection of the Rights of the Child covering the period from 
2004-2015 envisages a program to ensure labor rights for children, 
as well as prevention and elimination of child labor and 
exploitation during the period from 2007 to 2015.  However, 
according to the head of Women and Children's Issues Section of the 
Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs Lena Hayrapetian, nothing has 
been done yet to fulfill this program. 
 
-- Last year UNICEF reported about plans to review the NPA focusing 
more on children's labor issues (ref B).  However, UNICEF has not 
moved forward with this yet, deciding instead to wait for the review 
by the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child of the GOAM's report 
on the implementation of the UN Convention on Rights of the Child 
before embarking upon its review.  On February 4 the cabinet 
approved Armenia's joint third and fourth periodic reports on the 
implementation of the convention, and will soon present it to the 
Committee on the Rights of the Child for official review.  Post will 
forward the CRC reports to DOL once the English version becomes 
available. 
 
-- The country did not incorporate exploitive child labor 
specifically as an issue to be addressed in the governmental Program 
on Sustainable Development 2008 - 2021 adopted in October 2008, 
which replaced the Poverty Reduction Strategy Program. 
 
-- The government did not provide non-monetary support to child 
labor plans. 
 
-- The Government runs two anti-trafficking inter-agency groups. 
Please see above for more information. 
 
-- Armenia has joined a number of international instruments against 
trafficking, including the United Nations Convention against 
Transnational Organized Crime and its optional protocols -- the 
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, 
Especially Women and Children, and the Protocol against the 
Smuggling of Migrants by Land, Sea and Air (all ratified in July 
2003); the Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the 
Child on the Sale of children, Child Prostitution and Child 
Pornography  (ratified in June 2005); and the Council of Europe 
Convention on Action against Trafficking in Human Beings (ratified 
in February 2008).  Also on December 5, 2009 the GOAM signed a 
bilateral memorandum of understanding with the United Arab Emirates 
on combating trafficking in persons. 
 
 
2F) SOCIAL PROGRAMS TO ELIMINATE OR PREVENT CHILD LABOR 
 
-- The Government did not implement any programs specifically to 
address the worst forms of child labor.  However, according to Lena 
Hayrapetyan during the year, following interventions by an NGO, the 
Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs together with Ministry of 
Education helped working children in two-three cases to return to 
school, by giving their families one time monetary assistance and 
other support. 
 
-- The country did not incorporate child labor specifically as an 
issue to be addressed in poverty reduction, development, educational 
or other social programs. 
 
-- The government did not provide non-monetary support to child 
labor programs. 
 
-- The Government has registered significant progress in combating 
 
YEREVAN 00000064  008 OF 008 
 
 
trafficking in persons and has demonstrated a genuine commitment to 
fight this problem.  The most noteworthy improvements over the past 
year were registered in the prosecution of traffickers, as well as 
public awareness activities.  The significant progress in the area 
is obvious from the fact that in most of the recent criminal cases, 
there were very few victims who were actually victimized during 2008 
or 2009.  Most of the victims, especially in the cases of 
trafficking for the purpose sexual exploitation, were victimized 
prior to 2008, i.e. before the extensive public awareness 
activities.  The stringent trafficking penalties also appeared to 
have a salutary and preventive effect.  To illustrate, during the 
year there were 11 convictions on trafficking charges: two 
traffickers were convicted to 13 years in prison, two to five years, 
and one each were sentenced to three, four, seven, seven and half, 
eight, nine and 11 years in prison. 
 
 
2G) CONTINUAL PROGRESS 
 
-- All in all, during 2009 Armenia demonstrated significant progress 
in one aspect of combating exploitive child labor, i.e. in the area 
of trafficking in children as part of their general anti-trafficking 
activities.  However, government actions in all other areas of 
combating exploitative child labor were low-profile, partly due to a 
lack of resources and the persisting economic crisis, and partly due 
to the fact that according to the existing information, exploitive 
child labor does not constitute a major problem in the country. 
 
 
YOVANOVITCH