Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 10MANILA404, CORRECTED COPY: INFORMATION ON CHILD AND FORCED

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10MANILA404.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
10MANILA404 2010-02-26 08:46 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Manila
VZCZCXYZ0004
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHML #0404/01 0570846
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 260846Z FEB 10 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY MANILA
TO RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6701
UNCLAS MANILA 000404 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DOL FOR ILAB - LEYLA STROTKAMP, RACHEL RIGBY, AND TINA 
MCCARTER 
STATE FOR DRL/ILCSR - SARAH MORGAN AND G/TIP - LUIS CDEBACA 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ELAB PGOV PHUM EIND KTIP SOCI SIPDIS USAID RP
SUBJECT: CORRECTED COPY: INFORMATION ON CHILD AND FORCED 
LABOR FOR DOL CONGRESSIONAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 
 
REF: A. 09 STATE 131997 
     B. 09 MANILA 0102 
     C. 08 MANILA 1383 
 
CORRECTED COPY - This is a corrected copy of MANILA 212. 
This version clarifies in para 2 that there was no new 
information on adult forced labor; updates statistics in para 
8, response 6; and offers an overall assessment of progress 
in para 15. 
 
1. (U) Summary:  This cable provides input requested for the 
Secretary of Labor's annual report to Congress on the 
implementation of commitments to eliminate exploitative and 
forced child labor (Ref A).  It updates information provided 
by Post in Reftels B and C on the use of child labor in the 
production of goods, child labor laws and regulations, law 
enforcement capabilities, social programs aimed at 
prevention, statistics on child labor and child education, 
and government policies and programs to combat child labor 
and child trafficking in the Philippines.  Sources of 
information used during the preparation of this update 
include the Philippine Department of Labor and Employment 
(DOLE), the Philippine Department of Social Welfare and 
Development (DSWD), the Department of Justice (DOJ), 
Philippine law enforcement agencies, the International Labor 
Organization (ILO), and World Vision.  End Summary. 
 
--------------------- 
TASKING 1/TVPRA 
--------------------- 
 
2. (SBU) After surveying available data as well as 
interviewing primary contacts on labor issues, Post found no 
new information on the use of exploitative child labor or 
forced labor, child or adult, in the production of goods to 
add to what we reported in reftels B and C.  There were 
scattered anecdotal reports that child labor may sometimes be 
used in the production of bananas.  However Post continues to 
find no reliable indicators of the use of exploitative or 
forced child labor in this sector, particularly in the 
commercial production of bananas. 
 
--------------------- 
TASKING 2 / TDA 
--------------------- 
 
2A: Prevalence and Sectoral Distribution of Exploitative 
Child Labor 
 
3. (U) Children, primarily girls, are engaged in domestic 
service.  Children are also involved in the commercial sex 
industry as prostitutes, are used in the production of 
pornography, and are exploited by sex tourists.  Children 
living on the streets in urban centers are particularly 
vulnerable to prostitution and pornography.  Children are 
also involved in garbage scavenging operations and there was 
some concern on the part of a nongovernmental organization 
about the possible occurrence of forced child begging.  The 
government did not collect or publish data on exploitative 
labor during the year. 
 
2B: Laws and Regulations 
 
4. (U) On November 17, 2009, President Gloria Arroyo signed 
the Anti-Child Pornography Act, which carries penalties 
ranging from one month imprisonment to a life sentence and 
fines from 50,000 pesos to five million pesos (approximately 
$1,050 to $105,000), depending on the gravity of the offense. 
 The law prohibits hiring, employing, using, persuading, 
inducing or coercing a child to participate in the production 
of any form of child pornography.  It also specifies the 
duties and responsibilities of Internet service providers, 
mall owners and operators of business establishments, and 
Internet content hosts to report any commission of any form 
of child pornography in their respective areas.  The DSWD is 
conducting consultations with various government agencies and 
NGOs to draft the law's implementing rules and regulations. 
 
5. (U) On October 22, 2009, DOLE issued new regulations that 
clarify procedures for the closure of businesses found to be 
using child labor.  Businesses found guilty of violating the 
child labor law more than three times will be forced to cease 
operation and have the business premises sealed; prior notice 
and hearing is required before the issuance of a closure 
order.  Immediate closure, however, will be imposed on 
establishments suspected of using children for commercial sex 
acts, with court hearings to determine the validity of the 
 
government's complaint to be held at a later time. 
 
6. (U) The Philippines has a strong set of laws to protect 
the rights and welfare of children, especially those working 
in hazardous conditions or in the worst forms of child labor 
(see reftel).  Passage of the Anti-Child Pornography Act and 
new DOLE regulations for closure orders served to further 
improve legal safeguards for working children during the 
year.  Full implementation of this robust legal framework, 
however, faces the same challenges as other social 
legislation: limited awareness and training about the law 
among the public, law enforcement, and civil servants; a lack 
of dedicated budget allocations and insufficient numbers of 
law enforcement, Department of Labor and Employment, and 
Department of Justice (DOJ) personnel; impunity on the part 
of complicit government officials; and a lengthy trial 
process.  The continuing challenge is to translate existing 
laws into effective deterrents to violations of international 
norms and Philippine law, as well as to alleviate the 
underlying economic and social conditions that perpetuate 
child labor. 
 
2C: Institutions and Mechanisms for Enforcement 
 
7. (SBU) Section I and Section II:  Hazardous and Forced 
Child Labor 
 
COMMENT: Philippine institutions and mechanisms responsible 
for enforcement of child and forced labor laws do not 
differentiate between &hazardous child labor8 and &forced 
child labor.8  The Philippine framework examines &children 
in hazardous conditions,8 which encapsulates both forced and 
hazardous child labor.  The Philippine government uses the 
same mechanisms to address both hazardous child labor and 
forced child labor.  Therefore, our responses in this cable 
for the questions posed by Sections I and II are combined. 
END COMMENT 
 
Response 1:  DOLE is the lead government agency responsible 
for the enforcement of child labor laws through the work of 
its labor standards enforcement offices.  In addition, DSWD 
maintains 16 Crisis Intervention Units (CIU) and 30 
residential facilities nationwide to address cases of child 
abuse and support its victims, including trafficked and 
exploited children.  Each DSWD regional office also has a 
Special Action Unit (SAU) composed of personnel from 
different divisions within the region.  SAUs are empowered to 
conduct rescue operations within the regional jurisdiction. 
At least one dedicated staff member is assigned per region to 
participate in rescue operations, while an average of five 
social workers manage case loads at residential facilities. 
 
Response 2:  To exchange information at the national level, 
DOLE chairs the National Child Labor Committee, a 
coordinating body for the child labor-related initiatives of 
various government agencies and program partners, including 
NGOs.  This mechanism is replicated at the regional level 
nationwide, but its effectiveness was hampered by a lack of 
dedicated resources, personnel and training.  During the year 
a DOLE restructuring merged the Bureau of Women and Young 
Workers with the Bureau of Rural Workers to form the Bureau 
of Workers and Special Concerns, a move designed to 
streamline operations and reduce bureaucracy. 
 
Response 3:  The DOLE-led "Sagip Batang Manggagawa" (Rescue 
the Child Workers, or SBM) program is the interagency 
quick-action mechanism that responds to reports of 
exploitative and forced child labor.  SBM employs a team 
composed of the DOLE, Philippine National Police (PNP), 
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) and DSWD.  Its 
effectiveness was severely compromised by a lack of dedicated 
resources, logistical supplies, personnel, and training. 
 
Response 4:  DOLE was not able to provide an accurate 
statement of its funding for inspections of child labor 
cases, as DOLE inspectors are tasked with inspecting all 
aspects of the labor code, including child labor.  There were 
no inspectors or budget allocations specifically dedicated to 
child labor cases. 
 
Response 5:  DOLE employs 208 labor and employment officers 
nationwide to monitor and enforce all aspects of the national 
Labor Code, but only 153 were duly authorized to inspect 
establishments.  There were no officers dedicated solely to 
investigation; officers had numerous tasks and 
responsibilities in addition to their investigatory 
responsibilities.  The limited number of inspectors and 
 
inadequate logistical supplies made it difficult for DOLE to 
effectively investigate child labor law violations. 
 
Response 6:  DOLE's Bureau of Working Conditions, which 
inspects establishments for violations of all labor 
standards, inspected 4,233 establishments; 2,549 
establishments were found to have violations on minimum wage, 
occupational safety and general labor standards.  DOLE found 
only three minor workers during these inspections.  The 
number of investigations fell markedly from 2008, in which 
DOLE inspected 26,169 establishments.  DOLE reports the 
decrease was a result of their response to the global 
financial crisis, during which they ordered inspectors to 
focus on livelihood projects and job generation rather than 
their usual inspection duties.  The government acknowledged 
the limited number of labor inspectors made it difficult to 
enforce child labor laws.  DOLE noted that data on child 
labor inspections may be inaccurate due to incomplete 
statistics from the provinces. 
 
Response 7:  From January to December 2009, SBM conducted 16 
successful removal operations involving 79 child laborers in 
various activities.  Between 1993 and 2008, the SBM removed 
2,443 child laborers from harmful situations.  SBM referred 
the minors to DSWD for rehabilitation and reintegration 
efforts.  During the year, DSWD assisted 136 victims of child 
labor. 
 
Response 8:  There have been few prosecutions and convictions 
for child labor under Philippine law.  According to DOLE, 
most children found to be engaging in forced or exploitative 
child labor are in fact engaged in commercial sex activities, 
and therefore fall under the legal framework of the 
anti-trafficking law.  DOJ states that cases involving child 
labor are settled out of court, usually because of victims' 
desires to receive an immediate financial settlement and 
return to their families -- rather than participate as a 
witness in a lengthy trial process and be housed in DSWD 
centers.  Child labor charges are more often raised in cases 
severe enough to charge defendants under both the child labor 
and anti-trafficking statutes, the latter of which is 
preferred by judges due to its stiff penalties.  While no 
cases were filed in 2009 based on child labor law violations, 
DOLE reported three new cases filed in the National Capital 
Region against employers engaging minors in prostitution or 
obscene/lewd shows. 
 
Response 9:  DOLE did not report the closure of any child 
labor cases in 2009. 
 
Response 10:  In 2009, DOLE reported convictions in two cases 
in which defendants were charged for violations of both the 
child labor laws and anti-trafficking laws in the National 
Capital region.  Both cases involved employers engaging 
minors in prostitution. 
 
Response 11:  It took approximately four years to resolve the 
cases listed in question 10. 
 
Response 12:  In cases in which violations were found, the 
jail sentences applied met the penalties established by law. 
 
Response 13:  The creation of strong laws and improvement of 
the regulatory framework is an indicator of the Philippine 
government's commitment to combat child labor and 
trafficking.  All the same, the combined forces of a large 
poverty-driven supply of child laborers, severe government 
budgetary constraints, inefficient law enforcement agencies, 
corruption, and an overburdened, inefficient justice sector 
serve to hinder successful implementation of the protections 
established by law. 
 
Response 14:  The government continued to conduct 
awareness-raising activities on child labor and child 
trafficking laws.  DOLE regularly conducted child labor 
training programs for its labor inspectors.  On October 22, 
2009, in collaboration with the UN Children's Fund (UNICEF), 
DOLE conducted capability training for 62 of its labor 
inspectors nationwide on the conduct of inspection, rescue 
and enforcement proceedings on child labor cases.  The 
training yielded inputs for the development of a manual on 
the conduct of inspection, rescue and enforcement proceedings 
in child labor cases for DOLE personnel and labor inspectors. 
 
 
2D: Institutions and Mechanisms for Effective Enforcement 
 
8. (SBU) Sections I and II: Child Trafficking and Commercial 
Sexual Exploitation of Children 
 
COMMENT: The majority of Philippine law enforcement agencies 
responsible for enforcement of trafficking and CSEC laws do 
not historically differentiate between &child trafficking8 
and &commercial sexual exploitation of children (CSEC),8 as 
CSEC is generally considered a trafficking offense under the 
nation's anti-trafficking law, the Republic Act (RA) 9208 of 
2003.  Our responses for Sections I and II are therefore 
combined.  The passage of the Anti-Child Pornography Act, RA 
0775, in November 2009 may facilitate separation of the two 
categories in the future.  END COMMENT 
 
Response 1:  The Inter-Agency Council Against Trafficking in 
Persons (IACAT) coordinated, monitored, and oversaw the 
ongoing implementation of RA 9208 and served as an umbrella 
organization to coordinate anti-TIP efforts.  The DOJ and 
DSWD Secretaries co-chaired the IACAT.  Other member agencies 
included Department of Foreign Affairs, DOLE, Philippine 
Overseas Employment Administration (POEA), Philippine 
Commission on Women (PCW), NBI, Bureau of Immigration, and 
PNP.  Three non-government organizations representing women, 
children, and overseas workers were also part of the IACAT. 
The Commission on Filipinos Overseas, as mandated by an 
executive order from the president, runs a separate body 
known as the Task Force Against Human Trafficking. Against 
Human Trafficking Filipinos Overseas 
 
The PNP and the DSWD both maintained help desks to assist 
children victims of trafficking and commercial exploitation. 
 The PNP's Women and Children's Protection Center (WCPC) is 
responsible for the enforcement of child trafficking and CSEC 
laws, among other tasks related to the protection of women 
and children.  Following a 2008 expansion, the WCPC was able 
to create a WCPC desk in every police station nationwide. 
The NBI's Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force is based in 
Manila but carries out investigations nationwide; it 
comprises seven agents, five special investigators, one 
intelligence officer, and three staff members.  It can also 
draw on 17 other agents on an as-needed basis.  Cebu's Region 
7 Division of the Philippine National Police expanded its 
Regional Anti-Human Trafficking Task Force from eight to 12 
personnel during the year.  The limited number of personnel 
in law enforcement agencies dedicated to women and children's 
issues made it difficult for the various agencies involved 
with child trafficking and CSEC issues to effectively 
investigate and prosecute complaints and violations. 
 
Response 2:  The Philippine government did not allocate 
funding to the IACAT in its FY 2009 or FY 2010 budget.  It 
continues to rely heavily on allocations of personnel and 
resources from member agencies, funding from foreign 
governments and donations from Philippine non-governmental 
organizations and corporations.  Law enforcement agencies do 
not have budget allocations specifically for the issues of 
trafficking or children in illicit activities, but do assign 
personnel and allocate resources from their general budgets, 
which are determined by local government units.  The lack of 
dedicated budget allocations and resources made it difficult 
for the various agencies involved with child trafficking and 
CSEC issues to effectively investigate and prosecute 
complaints and violations. 
 
Response 3:  The country does not maintain a single hotline 
for reporting trafficking cases.  However, several government 
agencies, including DSWD's Crisis Intervention Unit, the 
PNP's WCPC desks nationwide, and an Immigration hotline, are 
used as channels for reporting human trafficking incidents. 
Several NGOs also accept reports of trafficking incidents. 
 
Response 4:  According to individual law enforcement agencies 
and NGOs that document cases of trafficking, in 2009 the PNP 
investigated 154 cases of child trafficking and the NBI 
investigated 189 cases of alleged trafficking received from 
various sources, including victim complaints and NGO 
referrals. At year's end, 118 cases remained under 
investigation.  NBI's reporting mechanisms do not distinguish 
between child and adult trafficking cases, so it is unclear 
how many of those trafficking cases involve minors.  In 
cooperation with UNICEF, the IACAT launched the National 
Recovery and Reintegration Database in December 2009.  The 
database is gradually being rolled out nationwide, and will 
be the nation's first effort to create a comprehensive, 
multi-agency database to standardize reporting on and track 
cases of trafficking, to include victim information, social 
service delivery to victims, and data from law enforcement on 
 
the status of case investigation and prosecution.  The 
limited number of dedicated personnel and budget resources 
made it difficult for the various agencies involved with 
child trafficking and CSEC issues to effectively investigate 
complaints and violations. 
 
Response 5:  The DSWD provided services to 221 victims or 
potential victims of child trafficking and 63 child victims 
of prostitution, 3 victims of child pornography, 44 child 
victims of cyber pornography, and 11 victims of pedophilia. 
In October 2009, the newly-expanded Regional Anti-Human 
Trafficking Task Force in Cebu carried out three operations 
that rescued 17 minors trafficked into prostitution.  There 
were reports that DSWD centers were overburdened by 
large-scale police operations or raids, requiring law 
enforcement to coordinate the timing of raids to ensure DSWD 
has the capacity to provide services to victims, or refer 
victims to privately operated shelters. 
 
Response 6:  The NBI reported that, of the 189 trafficking 
cases under investigation in 2009, 84 were recommended for 
prosecution and 2 were under inquest proceedings.  In 2009, 
the DOJ received 228 new trafficking cases for review and 
filed 206 for prosecution, an over 100% increase over the 
number of cases filed in 2008.  However, the DOJ's reporting 
mechanisms do not differentiate between child and adult 
trafficking cases, so it is unclear how many of those 
trafficking cases involve minors.  Most lower-level courts do 
not effectively use computers to track cases, hindering 
effective and accurate data collection. 
 
Response 7:  The DOJ and PNP did not report the number of 
child trafficking/CSEC cases closed in 2009.  The NBI 
reported the closure of eight cases in 2009. 
 
Response 8.  During the year, the government convicted eight 
individuals in five cases of sex trafficking involving 
minors.  A court convicted a police officer and his 
accomplice for the sex trafficking of children in the first 
known conviction of a public official for a 
trafficking-related office in the Philippines. 
 
Response 9:  Sentences imposed in trafficking convictions 
meet standards established in the legal framework.  Five 
convicted traffickers were sentenced to life imprisonment; 
one was sentenced to over 30 years' imprisonment for three 
violations of anti-trafficking law; one entered into a plea 
bargain agreement and was sentenced to 15 years' 
imprisonment; and one was sentenced to 8-10 years' 
imprisonment, in addition to fines and damages. 
 
Response 10:  Imposed sentences are being served. 
 
Response 11:  According to DOJ estimates, it takes an average 
of four years to resolve child trafficking or CSEC cases. 
 
Response 12:  The government continued its efforts to train 
police, prosecutors, and social workers on child trafficking 
and CSEC laws.  During the year, the PNP's WCPC conducted 
training on anti-trafficking investigative techniques for 151 
of its personnel and included anti-trafficking elements in 
other courses that trained 352 personnel.  The PNP also 
included training on RA 9208 (the anti-trafficking law) in 
its course on gender-based law enforcement issues.  The IACAT 
conducted training on RA 9208 for 109 prosecutors in three 
regions.  With the government's own resources severely 
limited, it also looked for partnerships with foreign donors 
and internationally funded NGOs for assistance in training 
law enforcement officers and prosecutors. 
 
Response 13:  The New People's Army and Abu Sayyaf Group, 
U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations, reportedly 
used child soldiers in combat or auxiliary roles.  The 
government continued its efforts to combat these groups.  A 
2007 study commissioned by the UNICEF found that children as 
young as 10 years were used as soldiers or recruited by the 
southern Philippines insurgent group Moro Islamic Liberation 
Front (MILF).  Most of the children were volunteers who 
served in noncombat roles, often with the support of their 
families.  During the December 2008 visit of the Special 
Representative of the UN Secretary General, the MILF agreed 
to stop the recruitment and use of children in its ranks. On 
July 31, 2009, UNICEF and the MILF signed an action plan to 
prevent the recruitment and use of child soldiers and to 
release children from all MILF units; the government 
supported UNICEF's intervention and partnership with the MILF 
on this issue.  As of early 2010, UNICEF continued to 
 
investigate possible use of child soldiers in the 
Philippines, but the Embassy was not aware of current 
evidence of the use of child soldiers.  As of 2009, some NGOs 
working specifically on this issue were unable to provide 
recent examples of child soldier use in the Philippines. 
 
9. (SBU) 2D, Section III: Children in Illicit Activities 
 
Response 1:  The Dangerous Drug Board (DDB) is the national 
policy-making and strategy-formulating body on all matters 
pertaining to drug abuse prevention and control.  The 
Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency (PDEA) is the implementing 
arm of DDB and the lead agency responsible for the 
enforcement of the RA 9165, the Comprehensive Dangerous Drugs 
Act of 2002, which contains provisions on the use of children 
in the production and trafficking of drugs.  Its mandate 
includes the arrest and apprehension of violators; seizure or 
confiscation of all dangerous drugs and/or controlled 
precursors and essential chemicals; preparation for 
prosecution or causing the filing of appropriate criminal and 
civil cases for violation of all laws on dangerous drugs and 
controlled precursors and essential chemicals and other 
substances.  PDEA has 1,089 employees; approximately 500 are 
drug enforcement officers involved in its anti-illegal drug 
operations.  There were no officers dedicated solely to 
investigation of cases involving children in illicit 
activities.  The limited number of drug enforcement officers 
hampered the agency's ability to effectively investigate 
complaints and violations to the anti-drug law.  The PNP's 
Anti-Illegal Drug Special Operation Task Force (PNP-AIDSOTF), 
NBI's Anti-Illegal Drugs Task Force and the Custom Task Force 
in Dangerous Drugs and Controlled Chemicals (CTGDDCC) also 
conducts anti-illegal drug operations, in coordination with 
PDEA.  Minors involved in the production and trafficking of 
drugs are turned over to the DSWD for rehabilitation. 
 
Response 2:  PDEA was not able to provide an accurate 
assessment of its funding for inspections on the use of 
children in illicit activities, as PDEA drug enforcers are 
tasked with investigating all aspects of the anti-drug law. 
The 2009 PDEA budget was 623.67 million pesos ($13.1 
million); approximately 45 percent of its budget was used for 
intelligence and investigation services and anti-drug 
operations. 
 
Response 3:  PDEA maintains a 24-hour hotline which can be 
used to report the use of children in illicit activities. 
PDEA was not able to provide accurate information on the 
number of complaints received involving children in illicit 
activities.  But PDA estimates it received more than 4,000 
complaints about the use of illegal drugs in 2009. 
 
Responses 4:  PDEA was not able to provide accurate 
information on investigations opened with regard to the use 
of children in illicit activities, but confirmed that there 
were 8,452 anti-illegal drug operations conducted in 2009. 
 
Response 5:  DSWD provided assistance to 399 children in 
conflict with the law in 2009, but does not statistically 
separate children in illicit activities from the broader 
category of children in conflict with the law. 
 
Response 6:  During the year, approximately 8,468 persons 
were apprehended for the use of illegal drugs, 377 of whom 
were minors who acted as runners, couriers, and messengers. 
A total of 7,253 cases were filed involving illegal drugs; 
PDEA was not able to confirm that the figure of 377 
apprehensions for use represented the total number of 
drug-related cases involving children. 
 
Response 7:  There were 3,520 resolved cases involving 
illegal drugs in 2009.  PDEA was not able to specify the 
number of resolved cases involving children. 
 
Response 8:  There were 760 convictions in drug-related cases 
in 2009.  DOJ and PDEA were not able to specify the number of 
convictions that involved children.  Under Philippine law, 
children aged nine and younger at the time of the offense are 
exempt from criminal liability. 
 
Response 9:  PDEA confirmed that sentences imposed meet 
standards established within the anti-drug laws. 
 
Response 10:  PDEA confirmed that sentences imposed are 
generally served, but RA 9165 (the drugs act) does allow for 
suspended sentences and/or placement in social welfare 
facilities for youthful offenders who meet certain 
 
guidelines.  If the minor offender complies with the 
requirements of the Dangerous Drug Board, the court may 
discharge the accused and dismiss all proceedings.  The 
option of suspended sentence is only available to first-time 
offenders. 
 
Response 11:  It takes from 3 to 10 years to resolve 
drug-related cases. 
 
Response 12:  With 400 million pesos ($8.39 million) in funds 
from the Presidential Anti-Graft Commission (PAGC), the PDEA 
was able to train a total of 570 drug enforcement officers. 
 
Response 13:  See Response 13 in 2D, Sections I and II. 
 
2E: Government Policies on Child Labor 
 
10. (U) The Philippine National Strategic Framework for Plan 
Development for Children, 2000-2025, also known as "Child 
21," and the Philippine Program Against Child Labor (PPACL), 
are the primary government policy instruments for the 
development, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation of 
programs designed to prevent and eliminate child labor in the 
Philippines.  The Medium Term Philippine Development Plan 
2004-2010 also includes measures for reducing the incidence 
of child labor, especially in hazardous occupations.  In the 
plan, the Philippine Government pledges to strengthen 
mechanisms to monitor the implementation of child protection 
laws; develop "social technologies" to respond to child 
trafficking and pornography; and implement an enhanced 
program for children in armed conflict. 
 
11. (U) A plan of action for the PPACL Strategic Framework 
for the period 2008-2010 is currently being implemented by 
PPACL's network of partners and monitored by DOLE.  All 
concerned government agencies utilize their regular funds in 
the implementation of the plans and frameworks but are 
supplemented by funds from international organizations such 
as the ILO and UNICEF. 
 
2F: Social Programs to Eliminate or Prevent Child Labor 
 
12. (U) Under the Philippine Program Against Child Labor 
(PPACL), DOLE implemented several projects that aimed to 
reduce the incidence of child labor.  These projects are 
being implemented by DOLE, in collaboration with various 
social partners.  The amount provided for the projects varies 
depending on the activity and the approved budget per 
activity.  Budgetary constraints are addressed through 
cost-sharing and resource mobilization.  These programs 
include: 
 
-- Eliminating Child Labor in the Tobacco Industry (ECLTI) 
Project:  In collaboration with a Swiss foundation, this 
project provides scholarship grants to 286 children and 
entrepreneurship training for their parents to reduce the 
incidence of child labor in the tobacco fields of the Ilocos 
region. 
 
-- Kabuhayan para sa Magulang ng Batang Manggagawa 
(Livelihood for the Parents of Child Laborers):  This project 
contributes to the prevention and elimination of child labor 
by providing families of child laborers access to livelihood 
opportunities.  In 2009, a total of 310 parents of child 
laborers in seven regions were provided livelihood assistance 
amounting to 4.26 million pesos ($89,420). 
 
-- Project Angel Tree: A key part of DOLE's campaign against 
child labor, this project provides an array of services that 
range from food, clothing, and educational assistance 
including work and training opportunities for child laborers 
and their families.  The project assisted 4,104 child 
laborers from 2006 to June 2009. 
 
-- Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT):  The CCT is a social 
assistance and development program that aims to break the 
intergenerational cycle of poverty by providing families with 
means to develop their human capital.  Impoverished 
households with children up to 14 years old are eligible for 
a healthcare benefit of 500 pesos ($11) per household per 
month and education benefits of 300 pesos per month for up to 
a maximum of three children.  Children between 6-14 years of 
age must maintain at least an 85 percent school attendance 
rate to qualify for the education benefit.  Beneficiaries are 
eligible to receive CCT benefits for a maximum of five years. 
 During the year, 692,798 household beneficiaries received 
health and education grants valued at 5.96 billion pesos 
 
 
 
($125 million).  For this program, the DSWD specifically 
targeted child laborers and their families and children at 
risk of falling into child labor. 
 
-- Food for School Program (FSP): Part of the government's 
Accelerated Hunger Mitigation Plan (AHMP), this program is 
implemented in priority areas identified by the National 
Nutrition Council as having high hunger and poverty incidence 
statistics.  The program provides one kilo of iron-fortified 
rice per day of school attendance at Department of Education 
(DOE)-supervised primary schools, pre-schools and DSWD day 
care centers.  During the year, rice valued at 765 million 
pesos ($16.06 million) was provided to 502,163 children 
beneficiaries in 13,788 day care centers in 495 cities and 
municipalities.  To more effectively target children at-risk 
for child labor, DSWD and DOE worked during the year to more 
closely integrate beneficiaries of this program with CCT 
beneficiaries. 
 
13. (U) The Philippine Government, with support from the U.S. 
and other foreign governments, participated in several 
initiatives to combat child labor in the country.  The key 
programs, implemented in cooperation with the ILO and World 
Vision were: 
 
-- Combating Child Labor in Small-Scale Mining:  ILO Manila's 
partnership with the Technical Education and Skills 
Development Authority (TESDA) in working to combat child 
labor in small-scale mining in Camarines Norte province ended 
in July 2009.  The project provided skills training to 53 
child laborers, to remove them from hazardous working 
conditions.  Twenty parents of child laborers received 
entrepreneurial training under the program.  A pool of 
trainers from the provincial offices of the Department of 
Trade and Industry (DTI), DOLE, CoopBank of Camarines Norte 
and other TESDA-supervised schools in the Bicol Region were 
also trained to be able to provide future training on 
entrepreneurship. 
 
-- ABK Education Initiative Phase 2:  World Vision, which has 
entered into separate Memorandums of Agreement (MOA) with 
DOLE and the DOE to work with local government units (LGUs) 
and other NGO partners, has begun implementation of Phase 2 
of the ABK Education Initiative.  This four-year, USG-funded 
project aims to withdraw and prevent an estimated 30,000 
children from working in seven hazardous occupations: work on 
sugarcane plantations and in other commercial agricultural 
enterprises, domestic work, commercial sex, mining and 
quarrying, pyrotechnics production, scavenging, and 
commercial fishing.  The ABK Initiative provides transitional 
or vocational education programs for working children as well 
as those identified as "at-risk."  Phase 1 of the program, 
which ended in 2008, provided elementary, high school, 
vocational technical training and alternative learning 
systems education to 31,320 children, 14,323 of whom were 
"at-risk."  Phase 2, which began in October 2008, has already 
assisted 22,366 child laborers age 5-17 years old and 
provided them with direct educational assistance. 
Forty-three school teachers also received training on the 
needs of child laborers.  These teachers formed a core group 
of trainers who then helped provide training to 95 other 
teachers and Alternative Learning System (ALS) coordinators 
in three provinces. 
 
14. (U) The government devoted a significant portion of its 
limited budget resources to the education of children.  DOE 
had the largest budget of any cabinet-level department - 12 
percent of the national budget.  Elementary and secondary 
education is free and compulsory through age 11, but the 
quality of the education remains poor due in part to 
insufficient resources.  Government support for the education 
of poor children is provided indirectly through the public 
school system rather than through targeted subsidies.  The 
elementary public school enrollment rate for the 2008-2009 
school year was 76 percent.  The enrollment rate for 
secondary students was 46 percent. 
 
15. (U) To educate youth on the risk of trafficking in 
persons and exploitative labor practices, the DOE partnered 
with the Philippines Overseas Employment Agency (POEA) and 
the Commission on Filipinos Overseas to incorporate lessons 
on employment and international migration, including illegal 
recruitment and mail order brides, into social studies and 
values education classes in public elementary and secondary 
schools throughout the country.  DOE's Bureau of Non-Formal 
Education develops and encourages the use of learning modules 
for parents of working children in the various regions with 
 
high incidences of the worst forms of child labor. 
Translated into local dialects, the modules educate parents 
about their children's health needs and basic rights and 
opportunities for non-exploitative livelihood and 
income-generating projects.  DOE also operates a home-study 
program designed to prevent students from dropping out of 
school and into the labor force due to poverty, illness, or 
early marriage. 
 
2G: Continual Progress 
 
16. (SBU) The Philippine government continued to advance its 
efforts to combat exploitative child labor during the 
reporting period.  The expansion of the Conditional Cash 
Transfer program (see section 2F) during the year provided 
 
support for one million households, and is a cornerstone of 
the government's efforts to incentivize impoverished parents 
to remove children from the labor force and to prevent 
at-risk populations from being subject to exploitative child 
labor.  DOLE's early implementation of new regulations that 
facilitate immediate closure of businesses using child labor 
is a demonstration of the government's will to address the 
issue.  Philippine law enforcement agencies also cooperated 
with a number of other countries to investigate cases of 
child sex tourism during the year, including one case that 
led to the conviction of an American citizen in Florida. 
More than 29 percent of the Philippines, population lives 
below the Asian Development Bank's poverty benchmark of $1.35 
a day, and geographic barriers, a large number of remote 
rural communities, and poor infrastructure continue to impede 
economic development and the provision of government 
services.  While this economic reality persists, the 
Philippine government will need to consistently reaffirm its 
commitment to combating all forms of exploitative child labor. 
BASSETT