Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09UNROME61, REFORM OF THE COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09UNROME61.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09UNROME61 2009-10-23 17:34 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY UN Rome
VZCZCXRO8589
PP RUEHRN
DE RUEHRN #0061/01 2961734
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P R 231734Z OCT 09
FM USMISSION UN ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1173
INFO RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
RUEHC/USAID WASHDC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0387
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS 0238
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0292
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 0484
RUEHRN/USMISSION UN ROME 1247
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 UN ROME 000061 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
USDA FOR RIEMENSCHNEIDER, TREASURY FOR L.MORRIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR EAID PREL FAO UN
SUBJECT: REFORM OF THE COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY 
 
REF: USUN Rome 59 (NOTAL) 
 
1. (U) This message is sensitive but unclassified.  Please 
handle accordingly. 
 
 
 
2. (SBU) Summary.  From October 14-17, the U.S. delegation to 
the Committee on World Food Security (CFS) worked with other 
delegations to reform the FAO technical committee into a body 
that will provide value-added support and advice to the ongoing 
global effort to enhance food security.  The 120-member group 
reached agreement on a final reform blueprint (text in paragraph 
nine) that will be reported to FAO Conference November 18-23 for 
its approval.  The document sets the stage for a more productive 
CFS that supports country-led food security planning, builds 
upon the UN's Comprehensive Framework for Action (CFA), and 
institutes a High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) that will 
provide scientific and knowledge-based analysis and advice.  In 
an unexpected move, a Chinese-led bloc of Asian countries 
supported a successful Philippine candidate for Chairman of the 
CFS Bureau over the Argentinean incumbent.  End Summary. 
 
 
 
3. (U) A technical committee of the UN's Food and Agriculture 
Organization formed in 1974, the Committee on World Food 
Security (CFS) brings member states together once a year to 
address food security and nutrition issues.  After demonstrating 
several years of diminishing results, the 2008 Session of CFS 
instructed its Bureau and Secretariat to consider and propose a 
reform of CFS in 2009.  Over the past nine months, the 
Argentinean-chaired Bureau convened negotiations among member 
states, FAO, WFP, IFAD, NGOs/CSOs, the UN High-Level Task Force 
(HLTF), and other stakeholders on a detailed CFS reform text. 
 
 
 
4. (U) During the October 14-17 Session of the CFS, the U.S. 
delegation sought to improve the Bureau proposed CFS reform text 
in line with the emerging U.S. food security strategy.  In 
particular, the U.S. worked closely with other delegations to 
clarify CFS' coordinating role as a component of the Global 
Partnership for Agriculture, Food Security, and Nutrition 
(GPAFS); ensure CFS would be supportive of country-led food 
security planning and execution; and, prevent CFS from becoming 
a costly new UN body. 
 
 
 
5. (U) Because the U.S. showed a strong commitment to 
strengthening multilateral action and helped drive the plenary 
towards a consensus, other delegations responded positively, 
including some surprising but welcome compromises by the G-77 
and others.  The U.S. delegation succeeded in convincing the 
G-77 and a number of European countries to drop their insistence 
that the CFS "is" the GPAFS, and instead agree that the CFS 
would be "a central component of the evolving GPAFS."  Likewise, 
the U.S. delegation helped ensure the CFS is limited to 
facilitating support and/or advice "at country and/or region 
request" - as opposed to directly guiding "nationally and 
regionally-owned plans of action." 
 
 
 
6. (U) U.S. efforts helped convince other countries that the CFS 
"will build upon existing frameworks such as the UN's 
Comprehensive Framework for Action (CFA), the Comprehensive 
Africa Agriculture Development Program (CAADP), and the 
Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of 
the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food 
Security."  The CFS reform process will continue in a second 
phase (para 6 of text) that will be determined by future 
sessions of the CFS Plenary based on the experience of this 
first phase CFS reforms and the possible need for an expanded 
role for the CFS.  For instance, some see a role for a reformed 
CFS to eventually assume some responsibilities now undertaken by 
the UN's HLTF, if/when the latter body dissolves. Furthermore, 
the proposed budget for the reformed CFS for the 2010-2011 
biennium reflect modest medium-term aspirations for the CFS. 
 
 
 
7. (U) To assist the reformed CFS, the member states established 
 
UN ROME 00000061  002 OF 014 
 
 
a High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) composed of internationally 
recognized experts in food security and nutrition.  Responding 
to the direction of the CFS Plenary and Bureau, the HLPE will 
assess the underlying causes of food insecurity and nutrition, 
provide scientific and knowledge-based analysis and advice on 
specific policy-relevant issues, identify emerging issues, and 
help members prioritize action on key areas.  Advocated strongly 
by French President Sarkozy, and now funded by a French 
voluntary contribution, the HLPE will be constituted in the 
coming months, following an upcoming written call for 
nominations by the CFS Bureau Chair and FAO Director General. 
The panel, at the direction of the Bureau, will identify project 
teams to prepare research papers for discussion at the 2010 CFS 
plenary session.  As a newly- elected member of the CFS Bureau, 
the United States will have significant opportunity to influence 
the development of the HLPE and the selection of the most 
appropriate scientific experts. 
 
 
 
8. (SBU) At this session, the CFS Bureau was expanded from five 
to 13 members and will include a USUN Rome staff member to 
represent North America.  On the last day of plenary, G-77 
members struggled to agree on a candidate for Bureau Chair, 
after the Asia bloc refused to allow the Argentinean incumbent 
to remain in place.  Led largely by China, the group felt it had 
been largely ignored by the Bureau Chair during the CFS reform 
process.  Over the strong objections of Brazil and others in 
GRULAC, the Philippino Deputy Permanent Representative was 
eventually endorsed by the entire CFS.  The Mission knows De 
Luna well and believes he will be a strong ally in our continued 
efforts to make the CFS relevant and well-managed. 
 
 
 
9. (U) Begin text of CFS reform document (note internal 
numbering): 
 
 
 
I. CONTEXT 
 
 
 
1. The rise in food prices in 2007-08, followed by the financial 
and economic crisis in 2009, has highlighted the unacceptable 
levels of structural poverty and hunger around the world. The 
food and financial crisis threatens global food security and 
nutrition and the achievement of the 1996 World Food Summit 
target and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) for reducing 
hunger and malnutrition. It is now estimated that more than a 
billion people, one in every six human beings may be suffering 
from under-nourishment. These are mainly small holder food 
producers, particularly women, and other rural inhabitants. 
 
 
 
2. Faced with rising hunger and a weak performing Committee on 
World Food Security (CFS), Member nations agreed at the 34th 
Session of CFS in October 2008 to embark on a reform of the CFS 
so that it can fully play its vital role in the area of food 
security and nutrition, including international coordination. 
The reforms are designed to redefine the CFS' vision and 
 
role to focus on the key challenges of eradicating hunger; 
expanding participation in CFS to ensure that voices of all 
relevant stakeholders are heard in the policy debate on food and 
agriculture; adapt its rules and procedures with the aim to 
become the central United Nations political platform dealing 
with food security and nutrition; strengthening its linkages 
with regional, national and local levels; and supporting CFS 
discussions with structured expertise through the creation of a 
High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) so that the decisions and the 
work of the CFS are based on hard evidence and state of the art 
knowledge. FAO Council considered "the CFS reform to be crucial 
to the governance of world food security, with a view toward 
exploring synergies with the emerging Global Partnership for 
Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition" (CL 136/REP, paragraph 
29). CFS reform has been a topic of discussion in several for a 
including G8, G20 and the UN General Assembly and is on the 
agenda for the World Summit on Food Security 2009. 
 
 
 
UN ROME 00000061  003 OF 014 
 
 
 
Concept of Food Security 
 
Food security exists when all people, at all times, have 
physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and 
nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences 
for an active and healthy life. The four pillars of food 
security are availability, access, utilization and stability. 
The nutritional dimension is integral to the concept of food 
security and to the work of CFS. 
 
 
 
Reform process 
 
The reform proposals made in this document are the results of 
deliberations between the CFS Bureau and an open Contact Group 
established to advise the Bureau on all aspects of CFS reform. 
This participatory process included representatives from FAO 
Membership, WFP, IFAD, Bioversity International, the UN-High 
Level Task Force on the Global Food Security Crisis (HLTF), the 
Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, and NGOs/CSOs/private 
sector. 
 
 
 
3. In order to realize this goal and ensure better coordination, 
CFS Members agreed on three key guiding principles for the 
reform - inclusiveness, strong linkages to the field to ensure 
the process is based on the reality on the ground and 
flexibility in implementation so that CFS can respond to a 
changing external environment and membership needs. Members 
agreed that effective implementation of CFS' new roles will be 
carried out in phases. Starting after the Committee's meeting in 
mid-October 2009, CFS' activities, particularly in areas of 
coordination at the global level, policy convergence, 
facilitated support and advice to countries and regions will be 
the first to be implemented. While implementing Phase I, CFS 
will work on better defining the implementation details of other 
activities. In Phase II, CFS will gradually take on additional 
roles such as coordination at national and regional levels, 
promoting accountability and sharing best practices at all 
levels and developing a global strategic framework for food 
security and nutrition (see Section V for proposed 
implementation plan). 
 
 
 
II. VISION AND ROLE 
 
 
 
A. VISION 
 
 
 
4. The CFS is and remains an intergovernmental Committee in FAO. 
The reformed CFS as a central component of the evolving Global 
Partnership for Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition will 
constitute the foremost inclusive international and 
intergovernmental platform for a broad range of committed 
stakeholders to work together in a coordinated manner and in 
support of country-led processes towards the elimination of 
hunger and ensuring food security and nutrition for all human 
beings. The CFS will strive for a world free from hunger where 
countries implement the voluntary guidelines for the progressive 
realization of the right to adequate food in 
 
the context of national food security. 
 
 
 
B. ROLE 
 
 
 
5. The roles of the CFS will be: 
 
 
 
i) Coordination at global level. Provide a platform for 
discussion and 
 
 
UN ROME 00000061  004 OF 014 
 
 
coordination to strengthen collaborative action among 
governments, regional organizations, international organizations 
and agencies, NGOs, CSOs, food producers' organizations, private 
sector organizations, philanthropic organizations, and other 
relevant stakeholders, in a manner that is in alignment with 
each country's specific context and needs. 
 
 
 
ii) Policy convergence. Promote greater policy convergence and 
coordination, including through the development of international 
strategies and voluntary guidelines on food security and 
nutrition on the basis of best practices, lessons learned from 
local experience, inputs received from the national and regional 
levels, and expert advice and opinions from different 
stakeholders. 
 
iii) Support and advice to countries and regions. At country 
and/or region request, facilitate support and/or advice in the 
development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of their 
nationally and regionally owned plans of action for the 
elimination of hunger, the achievement of food security and the 
practical application of the "Voluntary Guidelines for the Right 
to Food" that shall be based on the principles of participation, 
transparency and 
 
accountability. 
 
 
 
6. In Phase II, the CFS will gradually take on additional roles 
such as: 
 
 
 
i) Coordination at national and regional levels. Serve as a 
platform to promote greater coordination and alignment of 
actions in the field, encourage more efficient use of resources 
and identify resource gaps. As the reform progresses, the CFS 
will build, as appropriate, on the coordination work of the 
United Nation's High Level Task Force (HLTF). One guiding 
principle to support this role will be to build on and 
strengthen existing structures and linkages with key partners at 
all levels. Key partners include national mechanisms and 
networks for food security and nutrition, the UN country teams 
and other coordination mechanisms such as the International 
Alliance Against Hunger (IAAH) and its National Alliances, food 
security thematic groups, regional intergovernmental bodies and 
a large number of civil society networks and private sector 
associations operating at the regional and national levels. In 
each case, the functional contributions they could make, as well 
as how the CFS could strengthen linkages and enhance synergy 
with such partners would have to be established. 
 
 
 
ii) Promote accountability and share best practices at all 
levels. One of the main functions of the CFS has been to 
"monitor actively the implementation of the 1996 World Food 
Summit Plan of Action" (WFS-PoA). Although countries are taking 
measures to address food insecurity, the specific programmes as 
they are presented do not necessarily help to report 
quantitatively on progress towards realizing the WFS-PoA 
objectives. The CFS should help countries and regions, as 
appropriate, address the questions of whether objectives are 
being achieved and how food insecurity and malnutrition can be 
reduced more quickly and effectively. This will entail 
developing an innovative mechanism, including the definition of 
common indicators, to monitor progress towards these agreed upon 
objectives and actions taking into account lessons learned from 
previous CFS and other monitoring attempts1. Comments by all CFS 
stakeholders will have to be taken into account and new 
mechanisms will build on existing structures. 
 
 
 
iii) Develop a Global Strategic Framework for food security and 
nutrition in order to improve coordination and guide 
synchronized action by a wide range of stakeholders. The Global 
Strategic Framework will be flexible so that it can be adjusted 
as priorities change. It will build upon existing frameworks 
such as the UN's Comprehensive Framework for Action (CFA), the 
Comprehensive 
 
UN ROME 00000061  005 OF 014 
 
 
 
Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP), and the 
Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of 
the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food 
Security. 
 
 
 
III. COMPOSITION, MODALITIES OF PARTICIPATION, AND CONSULTATION 
/ COORDINATION MECHANISMS 
 
 
 
A. COMPOSITION AND MODALITIES OF PARTICIPATION 
 
 
 
7. The CFS is and remains an intergovernmental Committee. It 
will be composed of members, participants and observers and will 
seek to achieve a balance between inclusiveness and 
effectiveness. Its composition will ensure that the voices of 
all relevant stakeholders - particularly those most affected by 
food insecurity - are heard. It shall further take into account 
the fact that the overall CFS includes not only an annual global 
meeting, but also a series of intersessional activities at 
various levels. 
 
 
 
B. MEMBERS 
 
 
 
8. The membership of the Committee shall be open to all Members 
of FAO, WFP or IFAD, or non-member States of FAO that are member 
States of the United Nations. 
 
 
 
9. Member States are encouraged to participate in Committee 
sessions at the highest level possible (Ministerial or cabinet 
level is desirable), insofar as possible representing a common, 
inter-ministerial governmental position. In those countries 
where there is a multi-stakeholder, inter-ministerial national 
body or mechanism concerning food security and nutrition, Member 
 
States are encouraged to include its representatives in their 
delegations to the Committee. 
 
 
 
10. Members take part fully in the work of the Committee with 
the right to intervene in plenary and breakout discussions, 
approve meeting documents and agendas, submit and present 
documents and formal proposals, and interact with the Bureau 
during the inter-sessional period. Voting and decision taking is 
the exclusive prerogative of Members, including drafting the 
final report of CFS Plenary sessions. 
 
 
 
C. PARTICIPANTS 
 
 
 
11. The Committee shall be open to participants from the 
following categories of organizations and entities: 
 
 
 
i) Representatives of UN agencies and bodies with a specific 
mandate in the field of food security and nutrition such as FAO, 
IFAD, WFP, the HLTF (as a coordinating mechanism of the UN-SG) 
and representatives of other relevant 
 
UN System bodies whose overall work is related to attaining food 
security, 
 
nutrition, and the right to food such as the Special Rapporteur 
on the Right to Food, the Office of the UN High Commissioner on 
Human Rights, WHO, UNICEF, UNDP, Standing Committee on Nutrition 
(SCN). 
 
 
UN ROME 00000061  006 OF 014 
 
 
 
 
ii) Civil society and non-governmental organizations and their 
networks with strong relevance to issues of food security and 
nutrition with particular attention to organizations 
representing smallholder family farmers, artisanal fisherfolk, 
herders/pastoralists, landless, urban poor, agricultural and 
food workers, women, youth, consumers, Indigenous Peoples, and 
International NGOs whose mandates and activities are 
concentrated in the areas of concern to the Committee. This 
group will aim to achieve gender and geographic balance in their 
representation. 
 
 
 
iii) International agricultural research systems, such as 
through representatives of the Consultative Group on 
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) and others. 
 
 
 
iv) International and regional Financial Institutions including 
World Bank, 
 
International Monetary Fund, regional development banks and 
World Trade Organization (WTO). 
 
 
 
v) Representatives of private sector associations2 and private 
philanthropic foundations active in the areas of concern to the 
Committee. 
 
 
 
12. Participants take part in the work of the Committee with the 
right to intervene in plenary and breakout discussions to 
contribute to preparation of meeting documents and agendas, 
submit and present documents and formal proposals. They commit 
to contribute regularly to intersessional activities of the 
Committee at all levels and interact with the Bureau during the 
intersessional period through the Advisory Group established by 
the Bureau. 
 
 
 
D. OBSERVERS 
 
 
 
13. The Committee or its Bureau may invite other interested 
organizations relevant to its work to observe entire sessions or 
on specific agenda items. Such organizations or bodies may also 
apply to the Committee for Observer status to participate 
regularly, periodically or exceptionally on specific issues 
subject to the decision of the Committee or its Bureau. Such 
organizations could include: 
 
 
 
i) Regional associations of countries and regional 
intergovernmental development institutions; 
 
 
 
ii) Local, national, regional and global CSOs/NGOs, other than 
those attending as participants, which are active in areas 
related to food security, nutrition, and the right to food, 
particularly organizations which are linked to a regional or 
global network; 
 
 
 
iii) Other networks or associative organizations including local 
authorities, foundations and research or technical institutions. 
 
 
 
14. Observers at Committee sessions may be invited by the Chair 
to intervene during discussions. 
 
 
 
 
UN ROME 00000061  007 OF 014 
 
 
15. Mechanisms for enhancing the effectiveness of CFS Plenary 
discussions will be explored, such as that of holding 
preparatory consultations of regional groups and of Participant 
constituencies (civil society, private sector, etc.) to define 
positions and nominate spokespersons. Plenary sessions of the 
Committee should be organized in a way that are manageable and 
produce concrete outcomes. There is no limit to the 
participation by Members. The Bureau will determine the 
allocation of seats for Participants and Observers in 
consultation with the CSO/NGO coordination mechanisms. The quota 
assigned to civil society organizations and NGOs will be such as 
to ensure their visible and effective participation, equitable 
geographic representation, with particular attention to the 
categories of organizations detailed in paragraph 11(ii). 
 
 
 
E. CONSULTATION/COORDINATION MECHANISMS AND ACTIVITIES 
 
 
 
16. Civil society organizations/NGOs and their networks will be 
invited to autonomously establish a global mechanism for food 
security and nutrition which will function as a facilitating 
body for CSO/NGOs consultation and participation in the CFS. 
Such mechanisms will also serve inter-sessional global, regional 
and national actions in which organizations of those sectors of 
the population most affected by food insecurity, would be 
accorded priority representation. Civil society 
organizations/NGOs will submit to the CFS Bureau a proposal 
regarding how they intend to organize their participation in the 
CFS in a way that ensures broad and balanced participation by 
regions and types of organizations keeping in mind the 
principles approved by the CFS at its Thirty-Fourth Session in 
October 2008 (CFS: 2008/5; CL 135/10: paragraph 15). The 
activities of the mechanism will include: 
 
 
 
i) broad and regular exchange of information, analysis and 
experience; 
 
 
 
ii) developing common positions as appropriate; 
 
 
 
iii) communicating to the CFS and, as appropriate, its Bureau 
through representatives designated by an internal self-selection 
process within each civil society category; 
 
 
 
iv) convening a civil society forum as a preparatory event 
before CFS sessions if so decided by the civil society mechanism. 
 
17. Private sector associations, private philanthropic 
organizations and other CFS stakeholders active in areas related 
to food security, nutrition, and the right to food are 
encouraged to autonomously establish and maintain a permanent 
coordination mechanism for participation in the CFS and for 
actions derived from that participation at global, regional and 
national levels. They are invited to communicate a proposal to 
that effect to the CFS Bureau. 
 
 
 
IV. MECHANISMS AND PROCEDURES 
 
 
 
A. OVERALL PROCESS AND STRUCTURE 
 
 
 
18. Bearing in mind that CFS will include a Plenary, as well as 
intersessional activities at different levels, the process of 
defining strategies and actions to be adopted by Members should 
be transparent and take into consideration the views of all 
participants and stakeholders to the fullest extent possible in 
order to foster ownership and full participation during 
implementation of these strategies and actions. 
 
UN ROME 00000061  008 OF 014 
 
 
 
 
 
19. The CFS will include: 
 
 
 
i) The Plenary of the CFS 
 
 
 
ii) The CFS Bureau and its Advisory Group 
 
 
 
iii) The High Level Panel of Experts (HLPE) - a 
multi-disciplinary scientific advisory body to the CFS 
 
 
 
iv) The Secretariat serving the CFS (Plenary, Bureau and its 
Advisory Group, and HLPE) 
 
 
 
B. THE PLENARY 
 
 
 
20. The Plenary is the central body for decision-taking, debate, 
coordination, lesson-learning and convergence by all 
stakeholders at global level on issues pertaining to food 
security and nutrition and on the implementation of the 
Voluntary Guidelines to Support the Progressive Realization of 
the Right to Adequate Food in the Context of National Food 
Security. It should focus on relevant and specific issues 
related to food security and nutrition in order to provide 
guidance and actionable recommendations to assist all 
stakeholders in eradicating hunger. 
 
 
 
21. Regular Plenary Sessions shall be held annually. 
Extraordinary sessions may be requested by its Members and 
approved by the Bureau after consultation with CFS Members. The 
results of the CFS Plenary shall be reported to the FAO 
Conference and to the UN General Assembly (UNGA) through ECOSOC. 
The Chair of the CFS should consult with ECOSOC and take all 
necessary actions so that modalities for meaningful reporting be 
established and implemented. CFS Participants, including UN and 
other intergovernmental agencies, NGOs and CSOs are encouraged 
to consider in their respective governing bodies the outcomes of 
the CFS which are relevant to their own activities. 
 
 
 
22. Any specific recommendations adopted by the Plenary of the 
CFS which affect the programme or finances and legal or 
constitutional aspects of concerned UN entities shall be 
reported to their appropriate bodies for consideration. 
 
 
 
C. LINKAGES BETWEEN CFS AND THE REGIONAL AND COUNTRY LEVELS 
 
23. It is crucial that the work of the CFS is based on the 
reality on the ground. It will be fundamental for the CFS, 
through its Bureau and Advisory Group, to nurture and maintain 
linkages with different actors at regional, sub regional and 
local levels to ensure on going, two way exchange of information 
among these stakeholders during intersessional periods. This 
will ensure that at its annual sessions the Plenary is made 
aware of latest developments on the ground, and that, 
conversely, results of the deliberations of the Plenary are 
widely disseminated at regional, sub-regional and country as 
well as global levels. Existing linkages should be strengthened, 
such as through the FAO Regional Conferences, and other regional 
and subregional bodies dealing with food security and nutrition 
related issues. 
 
 
 
24. CFS Members States are encouraged, at their discretion, to 
 
UN ROME 00000061  009 OF 014 
 
 
constitute or strengthen multidisciplinary national mechanisms 
(e.g. food security networks, national alliances, national CFS) 
including all key stakeholders dedicated to advance food 
security at national and local levels. Through renewed 
mobilization and coordination of key stakeholders, such 
mechanisms will enable more effective identification and 
implementation of food security and nutrition policies and 
programmes. 
 
 
 
25. Existing structures should be used to ensure programmes are 
better integrated with each other and aligned with on-going 
national and local food security and nutrition priorities. This 
would take advantage of the field presence of stakeholders 
involved in the CFS. Key partners will include United Nations 
Country Teams, the United Nation's High Level Task Force (HLTF), 
the International Alliance against Hunger and its National 
Alliances, national and regional food security thematic groups, 
and a large number of civil society networks and private sector 
associations operating at the regional and national levels. 
 
 
 
26. Such mechanisms could contribute to the elaboration of 
national plans against hunger and assist with the monitoring and 
evaluation of agreed actions and outcomes designed to combat 
hunger and food insecurity. They could also be instrumental in 
informing regional bodies and the CFS Plenary about successes 
achieved as well as remaining challenges and needs with a view 
to soliciting guidance and assistance in this regard. 
 
 
 
27. Establishing linkages with the country level is likely to be 
more challenging in countries with weak capacity or in those 
without a central organization to address food security and 
nutrition in a multisectoral manner. Nevertheless, it is 
precisely in such cases that the CFS Plenary should ensure that 
consultation with and input from the national level takes place. 
Ways of enabling such linkages need to be found. 
 
 
 
28. FAO Regional Conferences and regional meetings of WFP, IFAD 
and other concerned organizations are encouraged to devote part 
of their agendas to disseminate CFS conclusions and 
recommendations and to provide inputs to the CFS. Such regional 
bodies should, in coordination with the CFS Bureau and Advisory 
Group, open themselves to the participation of regional 
representatives of CFS participants and observers, including 
active participation by relevant regional intergovernmental and 
CSO organizations and networks, and to regional development 
institutions. The possibility of the CFS establishing and 
maintaining contacts through its Bureau to other regional 
organizations, such as NEPAD/CAADP, MERCOSUR, Arab Organization 
for 
 
Agriculture Development, Community of Independent States, and 
others, including regional CSO networks, should also be kept 
open. 
 
 
 
D. BUREAU 
 
 
 
29. The CFS Bureau represents the broader membership of the CFS 
between plenary sessions. It ensures coordination among all 
actors and levels and advances tasks in preparation for CFS 
plenary sessions. 
 
 
 
30. The Bureau will perform tasks delegated to it by the Plenary 
including the preparation of documents and proposals such as 
setting the agenda and sending requests to and receiving inputs 
from the High Level Panel of Experts. It will facilitate 
coordination among relevant actors and levels to advance 
intersessional tasks entrusted to it. The Bureau should also 
deal with matters related to the implementation of the reform 
proposed in this document. 
 
UN ROME 00000061  010 OF 014 
 
 
 
 
 
31. The Bureau shall be composed of the Chairperson and twelve 
members, two coming from each of the following geographic 
regions: Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, 
Near East, and one from both North America and South-West 
Pacific. The CFS Chairperson, on a rotational basis among 
regions, and other members of the Bureau shall be elected in CFS 
Plenary for a term of two years. 
 
 
 
32. The Bureau, immediately following its election, will 
establish an Advisory Group composed of representatives of FAO, 
WFP and IFAD and other non-Member CFS Participants (see para 
11). The Advisory Group will have the same tenure as the Bureau. 
The Bureau will invite the different constituencies of CFS 
Participants to designate their representatives to this Group, 
which normally will not exceed that of the CFS Bureau in 
numbers. The function of the Advisory Group is to provide input 
to the Bureau regarding the range of tasks which the CFS Plenary 
has instructed it to perform. Decision making will be in the 
hands of the member States. It is expected that members of the 
Advisory Group should be able to contribute substantive work and 
provide advice to the CFS Bureau. 
 
 
 
E. CFS SECRETARIAT 
 
 
 
33. There should be a small, permanent CFS Secretariat located 
in FAO Rome. Its task will be to assist the Plenary, the Bureau 
and Advisory Group, and the High Level Panel of Experts in their 
work. 
 
 
 
34. For the biennium 2010-2011, the Secretariat will be headed 
by a Secretary from FAO and include staff from the other 
Rome-based agencies (WFP and IFAD). Further arrangements 
regarding the Secretary, including possible rotation among the 
three Rome-based agencies, and the inclusion in the Secretariat 
of other UN entities directly concerned with food security and 
nutrition, should be decided by the CFS plenary in 2011. 
 
 
 
35. The present CFS Secretariat will continue to perform its 
functions until final decisions of CFS Plenary as per paragraph 
34 are adopted and implemented. 
 
 
 
V. EXPERT INPUT TOWARD REVITALIZED CFS 
 
 
 
A. HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF EXPERTS ON FOOD SECURITY AND 
 
NUTRITION (HLPE) 
 
 
 
36. In line with efforts to revitalize the Committee on World 
Food Security, members called for regular inclusion of 
structured food security and nutrition-related expertise to 
better inform its sessions. This effort should help create 
synergies between world class academic/scientific knowledge, 
field experience, knowledge from social actors and practical 
application in various settings. Given the multidisciplinary 
complexity of food security, the effort is aimed at improving 
communication and information-sharing among the different 
stakeholders in food security and nutrition. Its products will 
focus on better understanding current food insecurity situations 
and will also look forward toward emerging issues. The expert 
process will, through Plenary and the Bureau, aim to support CFS 
members and other stakeholders in designing strategies and 
programs for addressing food insecurity. Participants in this 
expert process will utilize and synthesize available 
research/analyses and add value to the work performed already by 
 
UN ROME 00000061  011 OF 014 
 
 
numerous agencies, organizations, and academic institutions, 
among others. 
 
 
 
B. KEY FUNCTIONS OF HLPE 
 
 
 
37. As directed by the CFS Plenary and Bureau, the HLPE will: 
 
 
 
i) Assess and analyze the current state of food security and 
nutrition and its underlying causes. 
 
 
 
ii) Provide scientific and knowledge-based analysis and advice 
on specific policy-relevant issues, utilizing existing high 
quality research, data and technical studies. 
 
 
 
iii) Identify emerging issues, and help members prioritize 
future actions and attentions on key focal areas. 
 
 
 
C. STRUCTURE AND MODUS OPERANDI OF HLPE 
 
 
 
38. The HLPE will have two main components: 
 
 
 
i) A Steering Committee composed of at least 10 and not 
exceeding 15 internationally recognized experts in a variety of 
food security and nutrition related fields. 
 
 
 
ii) Ad hoc project teams constituting a larger subsidiary 
network of food security and nutrition experts acting on a 
project-specific basis, selected and managed by the HLPE 
Steering Committee to analyze/report on specific issues. 
 
 
 
39. Led by a Chair and Vice-Chair, elected among the members of 
the Steering Committee, the HLPE will: 
 
 
 
i) Ensure state-of-the-art studies/analyses for consideration by 
CFS sessions on a variety of food security and nutrition issues. 
 
 
 
ii) Assemble expert "project teams" to prepare studies/analyses 
for CFS sessions. 
 
 
 
iii) Determine working methodologies and terms of reference for 
project teams, and manage their work. 
 
 
 
iv) Normally meet two times per year in Rome and possibly more 
in extraordinary circumstances, to review work methodologies and 
prepare work plans/products. 
 
 
 
40. Led by a team leader, the time-bound expert "project teams" 
will be responsible for drafting of studies/analyses under the 
HLPE Steering Committee direction and oversight. 
 
 
 
D. OUTPUT OF HLPE 
 
UN ROME 00000061  012 OF 014 
 
 
 
 
 
41. By request of the CFS Plenary or Bureau, the Steering 
Committee will provide scientifically sound, clear and concise 
written reports/analyses for Plenary or inter-sessional purposes. 
 
 
 
42. Following its introduction as an item on the agenda by the 
Bureau and according to the nature and purpose of a project, a 
report, its conclusions and recommendations could be introduced 
in CFS Plenary by the Chair of the HLPE Steering Committee in 
possible conjunction with the head of a specific project team. 
 
 
 
E. COMPOSITION / SELECTION OF THE HLPE 
 
 
 
43. The CFS Bureau, in close cooperation with FAO management and 
drawing from applicable FAO legal texts, will solicit 
nominations for the HLPE Steering Committee. 
 
 
 
i) The Steering Committee should reflect an assortment of 
technical disciplines, regional expertise and representation. 
Ideal candidates will have relevant experience working with 
cross-disciplinary expert processes. 
 
 
 
ii) Members of the Steering Committee will participate in their 
individual capacities, and not as representatives of their 
respective governments, institutions or organizations. 
 
 
 
iii) Members of the Steering Committee will serve for a 2-year 
period, renewable once. 
 
 
 
44. The CFS Bureau will designate an ad hoc technical selection 
committee comprised of representatives from among the Rome-based 
food/agriculture agencies (FAO, WFP, IFAD, CGIAR/Bioversity, a 
CSO/NGO rep) to choose the Steering Committee members. The ad 
hoc technical selection committee will submit its 
recommendations to the CFS Bureau for approval. 
 
 
 
45. Early in 2010, the first 10 members of the HLPE Steering 
Committee will be selected. The HLPE Steering Committee will 
then designate its Chair and Co-Chair to begin its work in 
anticipation of the CFS October 2010 Session, based on explicit 
instructions from the CFS Bureau. Additional members could be 
chosen shortly after October 2010 Plenary 
 
 
 
46. Members of the HLPE ad-hoc project teams will be chosen by 
the HLPE Steering Committee notably drawn from a database of 
experts to which CFS stakeholders can nominate experts at any 
time. 
 
 
 
F. SECRETARIAL SERVICES 
 
 
 
47. The joint CFS Secretariat, will assist the work of the HLPE 
Steering Committee and its Chair. Its functions will include, 
though are not limited to: 
 
 
 
i) Maintain a roster of experts. 
 
 
 
UN ROME 00000061  013 OF 014 
 
 
 
ii) Organize meetings of the HLPE Steering Committee and assist 
project teams, as needed. 
 
 
 
iii) Maintain system of communications, including posting of 
relevant reports/analyses. 
 
 
 
iv) Assist with preparation of working budget and other support 
documentation. 
 
 
 
G. CALL FOR NOMINATIONS TO THE HLPE STEERING COMMITTEE 
 
 
 
48. Immediately following adoption of this agreement during the 
October 2009 CFS Plenary, a letter co-signed by the CFS Chair 
and FAO Director General will be sent to CFS members and others, 
soliciting nominations for the HLPE Steering Committee. This 
letter would explain the structure of the new process, and 
contain the agreed Terms of Reference. 
 
 
 
VI. IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS 
 
 
 
A. LEGAL MATTERS 
 
 
 
49. The extent to which CFS reform proposals would require 
changes to the General Rules and Regulations of FAO governance 
aspects such as CFS membership, composition of the Bureau and 
Secretariat, and reporting arrangements, would require 
adjustments to legal dimensions of the CFS will be addressed by 
FAO Legal Counsel once the nature of the proposed changes is 
established. 
 
 
 
B. COST AND FUNDING 
 
 
 
50. The cost of a reformed CFS will be influenced by the nature 
and extent of functions and activities ascribed to it, 
particularly to its Bureau and Secretariat. Funding implications 
include considerations such as whether the costs of the new CFS 
would be shared by the main agencies involved, and to what 
extent (as per paragraphs 32-34). A preliminary budget and 
modalities of funding for the next biennium, including the use 
of voluntary contributions and trust funds for the HLPE, has 
been prepared by the Bureau and presented to the October plenary 
session for consideration by Members with a view to gain 
approval by FAO Conference. Resource mobilization strategies to 
cover the costs of participation by NGOs/CSOs from developing 
countries will also need to be addressed, as agreed by the CFS 
at its Thirty-Fourth Session. 
 
 
 
C. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 
 
51. Bearing in mind the complexity of the tasks ahead and with a 
view to improving the effectiveness of CFS, the Committee should 
focus on tangible outputs and outcomes as well as a roadmap for 
the progressive attainment of the renewed vision. More specific 
outcomes will have to be defined by the revitalized CFS in its 
forthcoming Sessions. It is proposed that, at its next 
 
Session, the CFS agrees on a phased and results-based plan to 
implement reform as outlined in this document. With this in 
mind, it is suggested that at its 35th Session, the CFS be 
invited to: 
 
Task Proposed deadline 
 
UN ROME 00000061  014 OF 014 
 
 
 
 
 
1 Approve CFS Reform document Oct 2009 
 
2 Election of CFS Bureau (paras 29-32) Oct 2009 
 
3 Bureau to present a draft budget and financing strategy for 
the reformed CFS including the HLPE (para 49) Oct 2009 
 
4 Call for nominations to the HLPE Steering Committee Oct 2009 
 
5 Legal Office to finalize changes to the General Rules of FAO 
and the Rules of Procedure of the CFS (para 48) Nov 2009 
 
6 Bureau to designate the ad-hoc technical selection committee 
for HLPE Steering Committee members (para 46) Nov 2009 
 
7 Bureau to establish an Advisory Group (para 32) Jan 2010 
 
8 Make arrangements to establish a Secretariat (paras 33-35) Jan 
2010 
 
9 Designate the HLPE Steering Committee members (para 44)Jan 2010 
 
10 First joint meeting of the HLPE Steering Committee and CFS 
Bureau and Secretariat to discuss areas requiring advice from 
the HLPE and agree on a timetable for delivery (para 45) Feb 2010 
 
11 Bureau to develop a work programme through a consultative 
process 
 
Apr 2010 
 
12 Bureau to submit a proposal for a work programme including 
implementation of (some parts of) Phase II, to the 36th Session 
of CFS Oct 2010 
 
 
 
52. The Committee may wish to endorse this document and entrust 
the Bureau to proceed with implementation as outlined above. 
 
 
 
End Text. 
COUSIN