Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09TOKYO2010, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 09/01/09

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09TOKYO2010.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09TOKYO2010 2009-09-01 06:56 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO5793
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2010/01 2440656
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 010656Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5888
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 8564
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 6227
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 0042
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 3619
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6745
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0758
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 7421
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 7036
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 TOKYO 002010 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 09/01/09 
 
INDEX: 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Can DPJ achieve breakthrough and realize election pledges? 
(Asahi) 
 
(2) DPJ President Hatoyama plans fundamental revision of budget 
request guidelines with launch of new administration close at hand 
(Asahi) 
 
(3) Column article: "Think carefully, Mr. Hatoyama. Differentiation 
in foreign policy makes no sense" (Sankei) 
 
(4) Editorial: LDP achieves overwhelming victory in Lower House 
election; people have changed Japan; change of administration 
requires new spirit (Mainichi) 
 
(5) Change of government: Rapture and anxiety of "Prime Minister 
Hatoyama" (Sankei) 
 
(6) DPJ to review Defense Ministry's budget request (Sankei) 
 
(7) LDP, New Komeito's Fall (Part 2): Internal policy conflicts; 
path toward party's regeneration not in sight (Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Can DPJ achieve breakthrough and realize election pledges? 
 
ASAHI (Page 4) (Abridged slightly) 
August 31, 2009 
 
President Yukio Hatoyama of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has 
starting to work on forming his cabinet. The new administration will 
likely be launched as early as mid-September. The administration 
will face the test of whether it can really carry out the pledges 
the DPJ made during the election campaign. The Hatoyama cabinet will 
face a heap of challenges, including a drastic change to the budget 
compiled by the LDP administration, regaining trust in the public 
pension system, rebuilding medical services, and establishing equal 
Japan-U.S. relations. 
 
Bold budget change key to secure funding sources 
 
Compilation of fiscal 2010 budget 
 
Major policy proposals alone, for which the DPJ has indicated 
implementation schedules in its policy manifesto, would require 
funding resources worth 7.1 trillion yen in fiscal 2010. Whether the 
government can secure the necessary funds depends on how drastically 
it can change the government budget. 
 
The key player in compiling the budget is a national strategy bureau 
directly reporting to the prime minister. The bureau will likely set 
a budget outline. The administrative renewal council, which will 
also be newly established, will reexamine existing projects in the 
budget so as to squeeze funding resources out of them. 
 
The panel will start review the Aso cabinet-compiled fiscal 2009 
extra budget worth roughly 14 trillion yen. The plan is to squeeze 
out approximately 3 trillion yen through carefully examining its 
 
TOKYO 00002010  002 OF 014 
 
 
details, by such means as calling off the construction of a national 
media art center (hall for displaying anime cartoons) and 
appropriating the extracted amount into the fiscal 2010 budget. 
 
The administration will likely submit the extra budget after calling 
off projects that it has determined to be unnecessary, cancelling 
some project items in the existing extra budget or replacing them 
with other items. 
 
However, contracts with private companies have already been made for 
some spending items. Local governments have set up a vehicle for 
funds that are set to receive government subsidies for multiple 
years. A senior official of a certain economy-related government 
agency said, "I cannot imagine how the new administration will be 
able to convince the persons involved." 
 
The budget combining the general account and the special account 
totals 207 trillion yen, of which the panel will make an overall 
revision to items worth 70 trillion yen when compiling the fiscal 
2010 budget. Substantive cuts in subsidies or cancellations of 
public works are likely. 
 
Of the 70 trillion yen, subsidies account for 49 trillion. It is 
difficult to slash most of subsidies, as they are for social 
security and local allocation tax grants. Trimming public works 
could further undermine local economies. Lawmakers elected from 
local constituencies may oppose such cuts, which would necessitate 
the coordination of views among party members. 
 
Some are concerned about a possible delay in the compilation of the 
budget. Government agencies usually submit their budget requests by 
the end of August and compilation work begins to be ready for the 
final drafting of the budget at year's end. The DPJ intends to ask 
various government agencies to submit their requests again so as to 
reflect their wishes in the draft budget. 
 
The Japanese economy is not yet on a recovery track. Although the 
growth rate for the April-June quarter was positive, there is 
concern that stimulus measures might run out of steam. 
 
Takahide Kiuchi, a chief economist at the Financial and Economic 
Research Center, Nomura Securities, pointed out: "If public 
investment is slashed in the second half of the fiscal 2009 when the 
negative effects of stimulus measures will be felt, the economy is 
bound to plunge." He estimates that a 3 trillion yen cut in the 
fiscal 2009 extra budget would push down the growth rate by 0.4 
percent." The DPJ intends to expand domestic demand by enriching the 
household budget through the payment of child allowances and other 
benefits. However, since the Japanese economy relies deeply on 
foreign demand, the DPJ will find it difficult to manage the 
economy. 
 
Fiscal reconstruction is another serious challenge. Hatoyama has 
revealed a policy of constraining the issuance of new government 
bonds in fiscal 2010 to less than 44 trillion yen - the amount 
issued in fiscal 2009 -- after the compilation of the extra budget. 
However, the outstanding balance of long-term debts combining those 
held by both the central and local governments will reach 816 
trillion yen as at the end of fiscal 2009. If the fiscal 
reconstruction goal to be revealed coinciding with the compilation 
of the budget fails to persuade market participants, long-term 
interest rates will rise, creating a drag on the economy. 
 
TOKYO 00002010  003 OF 014 
 
 
 
Some households opposed to child allowances 
 
Social security 
 
The DPJ advocates child allowances as the showcase of the new 
administration's policies. Each child will receive 26,000 yen per 
month. The benefit will be provided until recipients graduate from 
middle school. This would cost 2.7 trillion yen even in fiscal 2010, 
when only half of that amount is handed out. Since the DPJ-proposed 
new allowance is almost three times the amount of the present 
allowance (paid until recipients graduate from a primary school), 
securing funding sources is a major challenge. 
 
The DPJ plans to secure funding resources, by abolishing spousal and 
dependent deductions from income tax. However, households with 
full-time homemakers that have no children might strongly oppose the 
proposal. 
 
During the campaign, Hatoyama repeatedly stressed the pension record 
issue in his stump speeches, saying, "Your pensions are falling 
apart." The DPJ has pledged to tackle the issue intensively as a 
national project at the cost of 400 billion yen over two years. 
However, a concrete plan, such as the amount of personnel to work on 
the issue, how to secure the necessary number of personnel, and to 
what extent the issue should be worked out in two years, has yet to 
be set. 
 
Prompt measures are sought against the spread of the new swine flu 
virus. The administration's crisis management capability could be 
put to the test on this issue as well. 
 
An especially serious question is how to secure vaccines. At 
present, it is estimated that vaccines for 13 million to 17 million 
people will be manufactured domestically before year's end. The 
amount is far below the amount needed to vaccinate 53 million people 
as estimated by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. Whether 
to import vaccines and how to prioritize persons eligible for 
vaccination must be decided as early as September. 
 
The new administration is going to be launched right after the 
jobless rate hit the worst-ever level of 5.7 percent in July. The 
DPJ has pledged to build a second safety net to assist those who no 
longer receive unemployment benefits, non-regular workers, and those 
who cannot be covered by employment insurance to reenter the 
workforce. 
 
The LDP-New Komeito administration established a measure to pay 
about 100,000 yen in living expenses to those undergoing vocational 
training as a temporary measure with a three-year life span. The DPJ 
will take over this measure for the time being. However, it intends 
to submit job-seeker assistance legislation to the Diet and 
implement the measure incorporated in the bill in fiscal 2011 as a 
permanent system. 
 
On the issue of the ways people work, the focus is on amending the 
Worker Dispatch Law. The DPJ incorporated a total ban on dispatching 
workers hired by the day and a ban in principle on dispatching 
workers to manufacturing firms in a package of common policies, 
which it has compiled in cooperation with the Social Democratic 
Party and the People's New Party. 
 
 
TOKYO 00002010  004 OF 014 
 
 
However, there is opposition to placing total bans even among DPJ 
members. Business circles are concerned that such bans would deprive 
job-seekers of job opportunities. Labor-management talks on the 
issue are expected to encounter difficulties. 
 
(2) DPJ President Hatoyama plans fundamental revision of budget 
request guidelines with launch of new administration close at hand 
 
ASAHI (Page 6) (Excerpts) 
September 1, 2009 
 
All government agencies have now presented their budget request 
guidelines for the government's fiscal 2010 budget. There are many 
requests that have different policy lines from those of the 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ). Since it is expected that the 
budget request guideline system itself might be annulled, the 
Finance Ministry is unable to enter full-fledged screening. It is 
now waiting for the DPJ to come up with a decision. 
 
The general account of budget request outlines for the government's 
fiscal 2010 budget totaled the largest-ever amount of roughly 92.13 
trillion yen, up about 3.58 trillion yen, compared with the fiscal 
2009 initial budget. DPJ President Hatoyama indicated his stance of 
substantively revising it, saying, "It is necessary to make efforts 
to conduct a fundamental revision of it." 
 
The total amount of general expenditures expanded to 52.67 7 
trillion yen, up 940 billion yen from the fiscal 2009 initial 
budget, due to a switch from the previous policy to curb social 
security expenditures. Local allocation tax grants also increased to 
17.5428 trillion yen, up 969.5 billion yen, due to a grim tax 
revenue estimate. The amount of requests for debt servicing costs, 
which is equivalent to the repayment of interest and principle of 
government debts, reached 21.9158 trillion yen, up 1.6721 trillion 
yen. 
 
The Finance Ministry intends to press ahead with the screening of 
compulsory expenditures that have to be appropriated under the 
system. The DPJ's policy will likely require a substantive revision 
to budget request guidelines themselves. 
 
Battle over budget: Sources of contention in requests filed by 
various government agencies 
 
Kazunori Yamanoi of the DPJ, who was reelected in the Lower House 
election, called Public Assistance Division chief Hiroyuki Mitsuishi 
of the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (MHLW) to his office. 
The purpose of the meeting was to ask for his cooperation in 
reinstating additional benefits paid to single-mother households 
that are receiving welfare benefits, a system that was completely 
abolished this year. 
 
The MHLW did not include a request for additional benefits for such 
households in its budget request guidelines in accordance with the 
Aso administration's policy. Yamanoi asked Mitsuishi to start 
looking into the reinstatement of such benefits in a positive 
manner, saying, "There is a strong possibility of a new MHLW 
minister ordering the reinstatement of such a benefit in about two 
weeks' time." The division chief simply replied, "We will look into 
such if we are ordered to do so." The reality is, however, that if 
the DPJ formally issues such an order, the MHLW has to follow it. 
Such sources of contention are visible among requests filed by the 
 
TOKYO 00002010  005 OF 014 
 
 
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT), as well, 
which the DPJ pointed out as a target of budgetary cuts. 
 
Targets mentioned by name 
 
Typical examples of such requests are the construction of the Yamba 
Dam in Gumma Prefecture and the Kawabe River Dam in Kumamoto 
Prefecture. The DPJ has singled out both projects as targets for 
suspension. Vice MLIT Minister Hiroaki Taniguchi during a press 
conference on the 31st said, "I would like to explain to the new 
ministers the circumstances of the projects and our approach to 
them." Essentially he wants to avoid a head-on collision with the 
DPJ. However, his first move was to maintain the previous policy. 
MLIT's budget requests, such as one for scrapping the provisional 
gasoline tax rate, include a number of contentious issues. 
 
The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) has also 
requested 2,475 billion yen for measures to strengthen its rice 
acreage reduction policy, including the full utilization of paddy 
fields for other purposes, taking no notice of the DPJ's showcase 
policy of compensating individual farm households' income. Vice MAFF 
Minister Michio Ide criticized the DPJ's policy. Hatoyama admonished 
him, saying, "In Britain, he would have been fired." The DPJ and 
MAFF are bound to face off in compiling the budget. 
 
A senior Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Ministry 
(MEXT) official said, "The DPJ's stance is close to ours in the 
sense that it intends to boost the education budget as a whole." 
However, although MEXT shares the same stance with the DPJ in 
outline, Vice MEXT Minister Toichi Sakata during a regular press 
conference on the 31st cited the method of providing assistance as 
an item up for consideration. He said: "Our stance is slightly 
different from that of the DPJ, which intends to pay benefits to all 
children regardless of their economic conditions. Will the benefits 
be paid to children's households or to the schools? A simple and 
speedy method is desirable since the system will involve 
administrative costs." 
 
(3) Column article: "Think carefully, Mr. Hatoyama. Differentiation 
in foreign policy makes no sense" 
 
SANKEI (Pages 1, 2) (Full) 
September 1, 2009 
 
Yukio Okamoto, foreign affairs commentator 
 
The article contributed by Mr. Hatoyama (Democratic Party of Japan 
President Yukio Hatoyama) to The New York Times before the election 
took the world by surprise. Let me translate some passages from it: 
 
"In the post-Cold War period, Japan has been continually buffeted by 
the winds of market fundamentalism in a U.S.-led movement that is 
more usually called globalization... Consequently, human dignity is 
lost." 
 
"The global economy has damaged traditional economic activities and 
destroyed local communities." 
 
His position on security issues, which I will discuss later, is also 
radical. This article, which heaps criticism upon the United States 
and negates the foundation of Japan's own existence, has created a 
stir. One American expert was quick to react to this article: 
 
TOKYO 00002010  006 OF 014 
 
 
"Hatoyama is no different from Chavez (the Venezuelan president)." 
 
Why had no one checked this English-language article that would hurt 
Mr. Hatoyama? Never mind Chavez. Another person who, like this 
article, blamed American unilateralism for what went wrong in the 
world is (then) Russian President Vladimir Putin, in his speech in 
Munich in February 2007. But even Putin did not criticize globalism. 
What Hatoyama said in his article is closer to the U.S. and European 
NGOs that protest against globalism and continually obstruct the G-8 
Summit. 
 
Japan is not a victim of globalism. It is rather a beneficiary of a 
world economy where people, money, and goods move freely. We would 
prefer to see Mr. Hatoyama argue for international cooperation. 
 
In the past two weeks, I have traveled to many constituencies 
talking to voters. It is evident that the outcome of the election is 
not a landslide victory for the DPJ, but rather a crushing defeat 
for the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which self-destructed. 
One-time LDP supporters had rebelled. That is why there was great 
dissatisfaction with Mr. Aso, who during the campaign kept up a 
barrage of criticism of the DPJ. In response the voters cried out, 
"We are saying you and the LDP are no good. Tell us how you will 
change the LDP rather than criticize other parties!" 
 
The people have not thrown their support behind DPJ's policies. 
Therefore, I would like to ask Mr. Hatoyama to have the DPJ study 
realistic policies at full speed. Foreign policy is particularly 
important. Unlike domestic policies, it is hard to start all over 
again when a mistake is made in foreign policy. 
 
Take, for example, the revision of the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces 
Agreement (SOFA). During the election campaign, the DPJ focused only 
on the provision by which Japanese are not given custody of a 
suspect before indictment and asserted repeatedly that SOFA is 
unequal. The U.S. will probably be reluctant to revise SOFA because 
of the impact of such revision on the nearly 100 SOFAs it has 
concluded with various countries around the world. This will lead to 
growing discontent among the Japanese people, who have been 
indoctrinated into believing that the SOFA is "unequal." 
 
The Japan-U.S. SOFA is not particularly "unequal." Some of its key 
provisions actually benefit Japan. For example, except for crimes 
committed while performing official duties, offenses by U.S. 
soldiers are tried by Japanese courts. In Germany, they are tried by 
the U.S. forces. This provision on judicial jurisdiction is more 
fundamental than the technical issue of custody of the suspect 
pending indictment. 
 
Furthermore, assuming that negotiations for SOFA revision are 
initiated, what will happen? U.S. forces, who have long wanted to 
revise SOFA provisions for greater freedom of movement and freedom 
to conduct exercises, will probably also present demands for 
revision. In diplomacy, one cannot say, "We reject all your demands 
but we want you to accept all our demands." So what will happen? 
 
If the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) ships are to be withdrawn from the 
Indian Ocean, alternative plans should be drawn up. Japan provides 
economic aid to Afghanistan, and JICA (Japan International 
Cooperation Agency) officials and experts are engaged in selfless 
activities there. However, the refueling mission in the Indian 
Ocean, which is in essence a sharing of the risk in the war against 
 
TOKYO 00002010  007 OF 014 
 
 
terrorism, is different in nature. Japan's "war against terrorism" 
currently solely consists of dispatching two Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs officials who are constantly guarded by the army of a small 
country, Lithuania. It is not America, but Europe, that is watching 
what Japan is doing. If Japan is unable to meet the international 
community's demands to share the risk on the ground and is even 
withdrawing its ships from Indian Ocean, this will amount to 
dropping out from the society of international mutual aid. 
 
However, the basic thinking on the Japan-U.S. alliance is much more 
important than policies on specific issues. 
 
Hatoyama wrote in his article: "How should Japan maintain its 
political and economic independence ... when caught between the 
United States, which is fighting to retain its position as the 
world's dominant power, and China, which is seeking ways to become 
dominant?" 
 
The article did have a sentence reading "the Japan-U.S. security 
pact will continue to be the cornerstone of Japanese diplomatic 
policy," but there is no indication of the recognition that Japan is 
an ally of the U.S. 
 
The U.S. is a country with the legal obligation to protect Japan 
from aggression under the security treaty. On the other hand, China 
is a country that has declared the Senkaku Islands to be its 
territory under its Territorial Sea Law of 1992, that has stipulated 
the main mission of its navy is to protect its maritime interests 
under the 1997 National Defense Law, and that is building a strong 
blue water fleet. Hatoyama regards America and China as equal and 
talks about maintaining independence from these two countries. 
 
The answer Hatoyama offers in his article is regional integration 
and a collective security framework in Asia. Can a foundation for 
collective security be built in an Asia where countries have 
different political systems, embrace different values, and differ 
also in terms of military power? This will probably only be possible 
in the distant future. 
 
If Japan chooses to maintain equal distance from the U.S. and China, 
it has only one option: independent defense capability, in other 
words, armed neutrality. For this purpose, the size of the SDF will 
have to be increased at least several times, and Japan will have to 
possess a nuclear capability. If that is not acceptable, the only 
alternative is unarmed neutrality, which was once advocated by the 
left wing of the (defunct) Japan Socialist Party. 
 
If the DPJ talks about "keeping an appropriate distance from the 
U.S.," this will only please the pro-China groups in the U.S. They 
will say, "Why should we have any qualms about Japan? Japan itself 
is saying that it should keep distance from the U.S." If Japan helps 
enhance such an atmosphere, in the worst case, the fate of the 
Pacific will be decided by "G-2," consisting of the U.S. and China, 
without Japan's input. We pin our hopes on the DPJ's diplomacy with 
Asia, particularly with China. However, this should be based on a 
solid Japan-U.S. relationship. 
 
The LDP made many mistakes. That is why it suffered a debacle in the 
election. However, it is an undeniable fact that the foreign policy 
consisting of the Japan-U.S. security alliance and light armament 
upheld consistently by conservative politics in the postwar period 
has been instrumental for Japan's security and prosperity. 
 
TOKYO 00002010  008 OF 014 
 
 
Differentiation from the previous foreign policy just for the sake 
of differentiation does not make any sense. 
 
This is what we want Mr. Hatoyama to ponder as he prepares to launch 
his administration. 
 
(4) Editorial: LDP achieves overwhelming victory in Lower House 
election; people have changed Japan; change of administration 
requires new spirit 
 
MAINICHI (Page 4) (Full) 
August 31, 2009 
 
An angry wave swept through (the House of Representatives). Veteran 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) lawmakers and factional leaders were 
defeated by unknown candidates one after another. The people clearly 
opted for change. Their decision on a change of government will go 
down in history. 
 
In the Lower House election (yesterday), the Democratic Party of 
Japan (DPJ) garnered over 300 seats, paving the way for a DPJ-led 
administration. Meanwhile, the LDP not only lost its status as the 
leading party in the Lower House for the first time but also saw its 
strength diminished to one-third of its reelection power, putting an 
end to the LDP-New Komeito administration. 
 
True democracy in which the leading party changes through an 
election has long been absent from the Japanese political scene. The 
new administration will be launched for the first time in the 
postwar period after a head-on battle between the two major 
parties. 
 
A historic power shift 
 
Although they had some anxiety about the DPJ, the public felt an 
urgent need to find a breakthrough to the deadlocked political 
situation. That sense of urgency resulted in the tremendous 
political upheaval. A rocky road lies ahead for the new 
administration to be launched by "Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama." 
(The new DPJ administration) must demonstrate to the general public 
its spirit and determination to change politics completely without 
resorting to brute numerical strength. 
 
More than simply the winds of political change, the outcome 
represented a revolution and a clear farewell to the LDP-New Komeito 
administration. Voter turnout, which reached nearly 70 percent, 
demonstrates the public's strong will to change politics. The 
collapse of LDP strongholds were symbolic events. Popular will 
seeking change developed into a generational change in lawmakers. 
 
The Hosokawa cabinet that was launched after the 1993 Lower House 
election was also a non-LDP administration, but the LDP was still 
the largest party and political reform was a point at issue. In 1955 
the Liberal Democratic Party was established and began its long 
period of single party rule. 
 
That system was finally ended in the fifth Lower House election 
since the single-seat constituency system was introduced to choose 
the party best suited to take up the reins of government. 
Democracy's original function of a power shift by means of an 
election has been restored, and that deserves a positive assessment 
as political progress. 
 
TOKYO 00002010  009 OF 014 
 
 
 
Although it is said that single-seat constituencies tend to have a 
snowball effect, this sea change cannot be explained fully without 
mentioning changes in the political and social structures. 
 
The LDP's power rested on the rigid structure of distributing gains 
to industrial circles and organizations and of administrative 
management by bureaucrats. The Koizumi reform initiative emerged 
when the nation's economy was in the doldrums and its fiscal deficit 
was snowballing. The LDP, advocating a small government, achieved an 
overwhelming victory in the 2005 Lower House election, and the party 
seemed resuscitated as a result. 
 
But the medical system, the pension system, socioeconomic 
disparities, and the battered local regions rapidly exacerbated 
people's anxiety about their livelihoods, and the LDP's reform 
policy course spiraled out of control. Two incumbent prime ministers 
walked off the job during the lopsided Diet (control of the Lower 
House by the ruling party, and of the Upper House by the opposition) 
after the LDP's serious setback in the (2007) House of Councillors 
election, exposing the party's lack of ability to govern. Public 
discontent with the Aso administration, which continually postponed 
dissolution of the Lower House without reexamining Koizumi's 
politics, crescendoed . 
 
Further, vote-collecting machines underpinning industrial circles, 
rural areas, and local assemblymen hewing to the Koizumi policy 
course also rapidly declined and turned their backs on the LDP. With 
second- and third-generation lawmakers reigning supreme, the LDP 
lacked able personnel as well. It can hardly be said that Prime 
Minister Taro Aso had what it takes as a leader to make a 
breakthrough in the impasse. Suffering from institutional fatigue, 
the LDP was on the verge of disintegration. 
 
In stark contrast to the LDP, which remained focused on industries 
and unable to break away from bureaucrat-led policymaking, the DPJ 
successfully presented points at issue by advocating 
livelihood-oriented policies and a departure from 
bureaucratic-controlled policymaking in its manifesto under the 
slogan of regime change. The voters' selection of the DPJ after the 
40-day campaign period carries great significance. 
 
But a ship that set sail after winning a large number of seats 
carries many risks. Great expectations go hand in hand with deep 
disappointments. Needless to say, the administration must not be run 
solely on the basis of numerical strength. An Upper House election 
is scheduled for next summer. (A DPJ administration) will be pressed 
to show evidence for political change. 
 
LDP urged to make a fresh start 
 
A politician-led decision-making system must be built swiftly. It is 
essential to put an end to the bureaucrat-led cabinet system 
epitomized by bureaucratic sectionalism so as not to follow the bad 
example of the Hosokawa cabinet, which failed to control 
bureaucrats. 
 
The DPJ also must clarity its ambiguous foreign and security 
policies in the process of forming a coalition with other parties. 
People voted for the DPJ in the knowledge of risks associated with 
the party, such as its insufficient explanation of funding sources. 
The DPJ must not have too much confidence in its victory by 
 
TOKYO 00002010  010 OF 014 
 
 
interpreting it as public trust in its ability to govern. 
 
The LDP's role, too, will be incredibly important as an opposition 
party. The party continued to remain in power even after its very 
presence was questioned following the collapse of the Cold War and 
the bursting of the Japan's bubble economy, and that led to its 
downfall. 
 
It is too early to conclude that yesterday's election has ushered in 
a two-party system composed of the DPJ and LDP. Nevertheless, the 
rule for deciding the administrative framework through an election 
must be established in the country. 
 
There are many pressing issues, such as the economic crisis, fiscal 
deficit, the pension system, and medical services. The new 
administration must by all means deliver on its campaign pledges. 
 
Voters who have entrusted the helm of government (to the DPJ), too, 
bear responsibility. Japan has now entered a new era in which voters 
will take part in and monitor politics more actively than before. 
 
(5) Change of government: Rapture and anxiety of "Prime Minister 
Hatoyama" 
 
SANKEI (Page 1) (Abridged slightly) 
August 31, 2009 
 
With his assumption of the prime minister's post becoming certain, 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) President Yukio Hatoyama probably 
has mixed feelings now. He said just after midnight on Aug. 31 at a 
multiuse facility in the Roppongi district, where the DPJ set up a 
vote-counting center, "I thank voters for choosing a change of 
government in a courageous manner." It was his second press 
conference, during which he attempted to wear a severe expression. 
 
There were scenes in which Hatoyama was chatting pleasantly with 
Deputy President Naoto Kan and Azuma Koshiishi, chairman of the DPJ 
caucus in the House of Councillors. However, he tried not to smile 
during televised press conferences on which the eyes of the public 
were on him. At the press conference in Roppongi he said, "I would 
like to carry out politics without becoming arrogant about our 
numerical power." 
 
Appearing on TV programs reporting the results of the election, 
Deputy Secretary General Yoshihiko Noda, too, had a fixed expression 
on his face and said, "Circumstances are such that we are sure to 
seize power." The fact that the DPJ won more than 300 seats means 
that the public has high hopes for the party. For Hatoyama, who will 
steer the new government, the people's high expectations for his 
party are a source of encouragement but also a source of pressure. 
 
The DPJ's victory had already been taken into consideration, 
however. Yesterday morning, Hatoyama told a lawmaker, a close aide 
of his, who was visiting his constituency, "You don't have to come 
to Tokyo, because I will not announce a roster of the party's new 
key executives." 
 
In creating the new roster of DPJ executives the focus will be on 
what post Deputy President Ichiro Ozawa, who was in charge of the 
election, will be given. Appearing on a Fuji TV program last night, 
Hatoyama revealed that he would give Ozawa a key party post with an 
eye on next year's Upper House election. "As leader of Team DPJ," he 
 
TOKYO 00002010  011 OF 014 
 
 
said "I want Mr. Ozawa to pave the way for all members to play 
ball." Asked by reporters last night about consultations on the 
formation of a coalition government, he said: 
 
"I think Mr. Ozawa will probably say that it is inappropriate to 
answer such a question under circumstances in which it has yet to be 
decided that we will assume the reins of government." 
 
Hatoyama mentioned Ozawa's name on purpose. It was a moment that 
hinted Ozawa was still playing the leading role in the DPJ. 
 
On Aug. 28, a senior LDP member with close ties to Ozawa reportedly 
sought to constrain Hatoyama's aide, saying, "I have heard that you 
are talking about an administrative concept and new executives as if 
we seized power. It is not that easy to control the political 
reins." 
 
On NHK and other TV programs last night, Ozawa was often asked about 
the possibility of expanding his influence in the DPJ owing to the 
large number of successful candidates, the so-called "Ozawa 
children." Even some DPJ members are worried about the prediction 
that Ozawa will strengthen his control of the administration from 
behind the scenes and establish a dual power structure. 
 
However, Ozawa said, "Your thinking of politics at such a level is a 
problem of you people in  the mass media." 
 
Ozawa on TV programs stressed that he "will support the party with 
an utmost effort as a member of the DPJ." There is no doubt that 
Ozawa's any move will control the future political situation. 
 
Appearing on an NHK program, Secretary General Katsuya Okada said, 
"I am filled with deep emotion" about the results of the election. 
That was the only time he showed any emotion, and he immediately 
pulled himself together. 
 
Okada said, "A rocky road lies ahead" for the DPJ. Therefore, DPJ 
leaders' remarks appear to indicate their awareness that it will be 
difficult for them to steer a Hatoyama administration. 
 
(6) DPJ to review Defense Ministry's budget request 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 30) (Full) 
September 1, 2009 
 
The Defense Ministry decided yesterday to earmark 116.6 billion yen 
in its budget request for next fiscal year to build a destroyer of 
the flattop type, which will carry helicopters and will be the 
largest of all vessels for the Maritime Self-Defense Force. The 
newly planned destroyer can carry nine helicopters against China's 
naval buildup. The new destroyer's blueprint, if translated into 
reality, will become a symbol of the arms race in East Asia and will 
inevitably become controversial. The Democratic Party of Japan has 
asked central government ministries and agencies to go over their 
respective budget requests. However, the MSDF brass is interested in 
acquiring the new destroyer. 
 
The new helicopter destroyer has a continuous flat deck and looks 
like an aircraft carrier. This helicopter destroyer has a 
displacement of 19,500 tons at full load and has an overall length 
of 248 meters, a size larger than the Hyuga and the Ise, which are 
helicopter destroyers and will be commissioned soon. 
 
TOKYO 00002010  012 OF 014 
 
 
 
A helicopter destroyer of the Hyuga class can be loaded with up to 
four helicopters for patrol and other purposes. Meanwhile, the newly 
planned helicopter destroyer can carry up to nine helicopters on 
board. The MSDF plans to build this new vessel "to meet the naval 
buildup of neighboring countries," an MSDF staff officer explained. 
In the past five years, China has built 17 submarines and 10 
destroyers. In addition, China is now aiming to acquire aircraft 
carriers. The new destroyer is intended to cope with such a naval 
buildup. 
 
The new destroyer will have dual functions to play the roles of a 
supply ship and a destroyer currently sent to the Indian Ocean. 
Furthermore, the new vessel will also play the role of a transport 
ship to sealift about 40 vehicles and about 300 troops from the 
Ground Self-Defense Force on a mission to strengthen the defense of 
Japan's outlying islands. 
 
The Defense Ministry positions the new destroyer as a replacement 
for the Shirane, a helicopter destroyer to be mothballed. However, 
the new vessel is a multipurpose ship that is far more capable than 
the Shirane. 
 
Under the current plan, the new destroyer cannot carry fighter or 
attack planes. The new destroyer therefore does not come under the 
category of an "attack carrier," which the government's 
constitutional interpretation does not allow Japan to possess. 
However, the Osumi, an MSDF transport ship, has its bridge on the 
starboard, and the Hyuga has a continuous deck. The new destroyer is 
designed to have a longer flat deck. This could pave the way for 
building an aircraft carrier. 
 
(7) LDP, New Komeito's Fall (Part 2): Internal policy conflicts; 
path toward party's regeneration not in sight 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
September 1, 2009 
 
At his news conference on the ninth floor of the Liberal Democratic 
Party (LDP) headquarters at 2:00 p.m. on August 31, Prime Minister 
Taro Aso (LDP president) began, "We lost many comrades, and this is 
extremely regrettable. I apologize deeply to the voters who 
supported us and I am painfully aware of my responsibility as the 
party president." He reiterated his intention to resign, but he 
appeared to have gotten over what happened and looked calm. 
 
Aso made the following analysis of the cause of the defeat: "There 
was discontent with the atmosphere of despair in society, with 
social disparities, and other issues. Due to the Koizumi reforms, we 
have not paid enough attention to our traditional support base." 
Then he added with emphasis, "We need to hold a presidential 
election promptly and regenerate the party in order to take back 
political power." 
 
Nevertheless, the shock from the historic debacle is tremendous. 
Many LDP Diet members simply do not know how to deal with the fact 
that the party has gone into opposition. Most of the elected Diet 
members are making courtesy calls in their constituencies and only a 
few are in Tokyo. Many factions watched their leaders go down in 
defeat and have been unable to even set a schedule for their 
executive meetings. 
 
 
TOKYO 00002010  013 OF 014 
 
 
The ad hoc LDP executive meeting held at noon decided to schedule 
the start of official campaigning for the presidential race on 
September 18 and hold the election on September 28 after heeding the 
views of local officials at the national meeting of secretaries 
general. 
 
Based on this plan, the election of the new president will not take 
place before the special Diet session that will elect the new prime 
minister. LDP lawmakers will have to vote for Taro Aso as prime 
minister. Although Secretary General Hiroyuki Hosoda remarked, "We 
will explain the situation at a general meeting of members of both 
houses of the Diet to seek their understanding," this is indeed odd. 
Former Secretary General Bunmei Ibuki burst into the party 
headquarters in the afternoon to object to voting for somebody who 
is going to resign, but was told that this schedule is "inevitable." 
 
 
It is true that rushing the presidential election will give rise to 
a situation where the prime minister and party president are two 
different persons until the new prime minister is elected. "You have 
to grope in the dark for everything once you stop being the number 
one party," lamented one party executive. 
 
The shock is even greater in New Komeito, where its leader Akihiro 
Ota and secretary general Kazuo Kitagawa both lost in the election. 
 
Ota held a news conference at the party headquarters in 
Minami-motomachi in Tokyo before noon on August 31 to announce his 
resignation. "We take the outcome of the election seriously and will 
work for a comeback," he said. "We will exert every effort to make 
the party capable of winning under any circumstances," indicating 
his bitter disappointment. 
 
However, the party has not decided on any concrete plans except for 
holding an executive meeting on September 3 and electing a new 
leadership before the special Diet session is convened. Ota and 
other senior party officials made a courtesy call on the Soka Gakkai 
headquarters in Shinano-machi in Tokyo on the morning of August 31. 
Senior Gakkai officials tried to console them, saying, "The party 
and the Gakkai both campaigned really hard. It's too bad that the 
result turned out like this," but there was no discussion on how to 
manage New Komeito from now. 
 
Kitagawa, who was also present at Ota's news conference, was as 
timid as could be. He only said, "I agree with Mr Ota." Since last 
fall, Kitagawa had been urging the prime minister to dissolve the 
Diet, but his request was rejected by Aso. New Komeito members still 
resent Aso's delaying the election. When Kitagawa was asked about 
this, he looked into the distance, saying "I don't really remember 
what happened in the past. Since the reality is what it is, it is 
useless to say this and that about the past." 
 
The rehabilitation of the party is an urgent issue for both the LDP 
and New Komeito. However, this is easier said than done. The prime 
minister asserts that "the reason why support for the LDP dropped 
was because the merits of conservatism had not been fully conveyed." 
He has announced that the LDP will make a new start as a 
conservative party. This is because he reckons that the new 
administration, which will include the Social Democratic Party, is 
bound to be more liberal, so projecting a stronger conservative 
color will be a shortcut to recapturing political power. 
 
 
TOKYO 00002010  014 OF 014 
 
 
Former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, an ally of Aso, also claims the 
party "should underscore our difference with the DPJ on foreign 
affairs, security, education, and other policies." However, the 
liberals say they are fed up with hearing the Abe-Aso line. There is 
no consensus in the party. 
 
Spreading its ideological wings too widely both on the left and on 
the right to meet the people's needs is a distinctive characteristic 
of the LDP. If it respects the opinion of one side, it ends up 
facing opposition from the other side; and if it chooses to 
compromise, it is accused of eviscerating policies. All past prime 
ministers have had to grapple with this tricky problem. 
 
The upcoming presidential election may further sharpen policy 
conflicts. Aso stressed that "the LDP is an open party. It is okay 
for members to voice various opinions. We are not a political party 
that suppresses discontent." But he added, "The most important thing 
is for us to unite after the final conclusion is reached. We will 
not be able to fight any battle unless we are united." 
 
Will the LDP be able to unite and act as one as an opposition party? 
This might be the most difficult problem for the LDP, which has 
evolved through a process of continual realignments. 
 
ROOS