VZCZCXRO4002
PP RUEHRN
DE RUEHRN #0051/01 2290925
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P R 170925Z AUG 09
FM USMISSION UN ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1134
INFO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0354
RUEHRC/USDA FAS WASHDC
RUEHC/USAID WASHDC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS 0228
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0276
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0045
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0043
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0091
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0108
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0055
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO 0007
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0043
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0054
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0130
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO 0060
RUEHRN/USMISSION UN ROME 1208

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 UN ROME 000051 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
USDA FOR RIEMENSCHNEIDER; TREASURY FOR L.MORRIS; AID FOR F.MOORE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL ECON EAGR EAID EFIN UN FAO
SUBJECT: FAO BUDGET CHIEF PROVIDES DETAILS OF REVISED BUDGET REQUEST, 
INCLUDING TREATMENT OF REFORM COSTS 
 
REF: STATE 84087 (NOTAL) - DEMARCHE ON FAO PWB 
 
¶1.  (U) This message is sensitive but unclassified.  Please 
handle accordingly. 
 
 
 
¶2.  (SBU) Responding to concerns voiced by the U.S. and other 
Rome-based missions over the FAO's latest budget request during 
a recent meeting of the Finance Committee (septel), FAO 
Management revised its draft biennial Program of Work and Budget 
(PWB).  On August 12, FAO Budget Chief Boyd Haight briefed 
Charge and A/DCM on expected adjustments to the PWB including 
modalities for funding the organization's reform package (the 
Immediate Plan of Action, or IPA).  Revisions are expected to 
include a reduction of IPA costs from approximately USD 60 
million to USD 38 million, as a result of revised assumptions, 
tighter scope and longer phasing for some items.  Rather than 
including only 20 percent of IPA costs under member assessments 
("net appropriation") as in the first draft, the revised PWB 
will include half the IPA costs (i.e., half of USD 38 million) 
under the net appropriation, with the remainder in a "core 
voluntary" column funded by extra-budgetary contributions (Note: 
 During last month's 128th session of the Finance Committee, the 
U.S. Vice Chair argued strenuously for all IPA costs to be 
covered under member assessments in order to share 
responsibility across the membership.  This was echoed by EU 
colleagues, while G-77 members remained largely silent on the 
matter.  End note). 
 
 
 
¶3.  (SBU) Haight said this was as far as DG Diouf was willing to 
go, and that he would not propose any increase to the proposed 
net appropriation beyond the USD 995.9 million requested (a 
7-plus percent  increase from USD 929 million in the 2008-09 
budget).  It was now "up to the membership to determine how to 
proceed," he added.  The revised documentation would be first 
approved by the Director General on August 13, and then 
translated and distributed on or about August 31.  A Special 
Session of the Finance Committee is expected to meet on 
September 18, at which point Management will likely seek Member 
endorsement of its revised PWB, ahead of a late-September 
Council meeting.  The November Conference will approve a final 
biennial PWB and adopt the necessary budget resolution. 
 
 
 
¶4.  (SBU) On the issue of comparability between the old FAO 
budget format and the new results-based budgeting model, Haight 
said the revised PWB would contain additional information on 
programmatic assumptions and details on how funds are to be 
distributed among programs and administration.  In addition, six 
or seven "Information Notes" will be prepared for Members to 
help clarify specifics of where costs and savings are drawn 
from.  Haight said the revised PWB will contain no reference to 
a "maintenance" budget (having drawn negative responses from 
many Members, including the U.S., during Finance Committee), and 
only one draft Budget Resolution containing 19 chapters broken 
down as follows:  11 Strategic Objectives, two Functional 
Objectives, and chapters for the FAO-Representatives program, 
the Technical Cooperation Program, "contingencies," capital 
expenditures, security expenditures, and a transfer to the Tax 
Equalization Fund. 
 
 
 
¶5.  (SBU) Comment:  These assertions and figures are consistent 
with what was shared with the Charge by FAO Deputy DG Butler on 
August 6, and in a separate discussion with A/DCM on August 11. 
It will now  be up to members to negotiate an appropriate budget 
level.  A key item will be the treatment of IPA costs, either 
included fully under the net appropriation (e.g., assessments) 
 
UN ROME 00000051  002 OF 002 
 
 
or partly funded via voluntary contributions (also subject to a 
seven percent service/administration fee).  Given the current 
global financial crisis, we expect there will be less cohesion 
among the G-77 than in previous budget cycles, since many will 
not want to see their respective assessment increased.  Haight 
noted that ongoing discussions in New York on the UN scale of 
assessments may impact views of several large developing 
countries (e.g., Brazil, whose percentage share may increase). 
In addition to our OECD colleagues, we may want to consider 
close coordination with China, India, Mexico, South Africa, 
Egypt and other key regional leaders whose views can strongly 
impact their regional partners.  End comment. 
GLOVERMP