Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09HYDERABAD56, BHARAT BALLOT 09: UNDERSTANDING ANDHRA PRADESH: DEFYING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09HYDERABAD56.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09HYDERABAD56 2009-06-01 14:35 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY American Consulate Hyderabad
VZCZCXRO7426
RR RUEHAST RUEHBI RUEHCI RUEHDBU RUEHLH RUEHPW
DE RUEHNEH #0056/01 1521435
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 011435Z JUN 09
FM AMCONSUL HYDERABAD
TO RUEHNEH/AMCONSUL HYDERABAD 0096
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0094
INFO RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0073
RUCNCLS/ALL SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0013
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0013
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 0013
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0013
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 0013
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0013
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0013
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 0006
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEILB/NCTC WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 HYDERABAD 000056 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PTER PHUM KDEM IN
SUBJECT: BHARAT BALLOT 09: UNDERSTANDING ANDHRA PRADESH: DEFYING 
PUNDITS AND EXIT POLLS 
 
HYDERABAD 00000056  001.2 OF 004 
 
 
1.  SUMMARY: With voter turnout in Andhra Pradesh (AP) 
significantly higher than the national average, the Congress 
party defied the exit polls to increase its huge margin in the 
Lok Sabha delegation from the state and win a simple majority in 
the state assembly.  The emergence of two new parties and a new 
matrix of caste politics appear to be decisive factors in this 
election.  There is some indication that voters split their 
vote, casting their ballot for one party in the parliamentary 
contest and for a different party in the state assembly 
election.  This voting pattern represents a change in voter 
behavior and bodes watching in the future to see whether it is a 
one off or a trend.  END SUMMARY. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
Congress Victorious: A Surprising Reprise 
----------------------------------------- 
 
2.  No political analyst expected either a voter turnout of 72 
percent (15 percent higher than the national average) or the 
Congress party to reprise its remarkable victory of 2004 - when 
it upset the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) to capture both the state 
government and 29 Lok Sabha seats, the largest Congress 
contingent of MPs from any state.  Still Congress Chief Minister 
(CM) Y S Rajasekhara Reddy (YSR) never wavered from his 
prediction that in the 2009 concurrent national and state 
elections his party would increase its national tally to 34 Lok 
Sabha seats and that he would remain CM after Congress 
candidates won 230 of the 295 seats in the Legislative Assembly. 
 After the votes were counted on May 16, it became obvious that 
YSR knew the pulse of the people better than any analyst. 
Overcoming the traditional anti-incumbency factor, he once again 
`delivered Andhra Pradesh on a platter.'  At the national level 
the electorate chose Congress candidates for 33 of the state's 
42 Lok Sabha seats.  The remaining seats were split amongst 4 
other parties: TDP - 6, Telangana Rashtra Samathi (TRS) - 2, and 
the All India Majlis-Ittehadul-Muslimeen (MIM) - 1. 
 
3.  At the state level, 156 out of 294 Congress candidates won 
in their district, which represents a loss of 28 seats for the 
party.  Still, this simple majority gives the Congress the 
opportunity to form a state government without the necessity of 
encumbering alliances.  Even though the TDP doubled its seat 
tally from 46 to 93 Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLA), 
its `Grand Alliance' partners fared poorly.  The TRS won a mere 
10 of the 44 seats it contested (down from 26 in 2004).  [NOTE: 
Political observers also claim that the poor showing of the TRS 
was the final blow to the Telangana-separatist movement. END 
NOTE] The media widely described the performance of other 
members as `dismal' - the CPI won four seats and the CPI(M) won 
only a single one versus their previous tallies of six and nine 
respectively.  The new Praja Rajyam party also failed to meet 
the initially high expectations for the party winning a mere 18 
races statewide.  Other parties to win seats in the Assembly 
include, BJP - 2, Lok Satta - 1, Independents - 7. 
 
------------------------- 
Caste in the Central Role 
------------------------- 
 
4.  Over the past 50 years, politics in AP has traditionally 
revolved around two dominant rival castes/party nexuses - the 
Reddy/Congress and Kamma/TDP combines.  However, political 
analysts observed that caste polarization became even more acute 
in this election as a third grouping - an alignment of the Kapu 
and Other Backward Class (OBC) communities - emerged in support 
of Chiranjeevi's PRP.  Other parties are also closely affiliated 
with caste groups: the Telangana Rashtra Samithi (TRS) is 
closely identified with Velama caste; and both Communist parties 
have a close affinity with the Kamma community who dominated the 
parties prior to the birth of the TDP. 
 
5.  The Reddy community is politically dominant in 15 of the 
state's 23 districts, including Kurnool, Anantapur and Chittoor 
in the Rayalaseema region, Nalgonda, Medak, Warangal, 
Mahbubnagar, Rangareddy, Nizamabad, Karimnagar and Adilabad in 
the Telangana region, and Nellore, Guntur and Prakasam in 
 
HYDERABAD 00000056  002.2 OF 004 
 
 
Coastal Andhra.  Academic and media interlocutors point out that 
from the perspective of caste the emergence of the ideological 
diverse pre-poll `Grand Alliance' - consisting of the TDP, TRS, 
CPI, and CPI(M) - made electoral sense. 
 
6.  Wherever the PRP's attempt to consolidate the Kapu and OBC 
vote banks behind a candidate was successful, the reported voter 
turnout increased.  This initiative was so vital to the new 
party that Chiranjeevi boasted to the CDA about the PRP's 
decision to put forward 104 OBC nominees for State Assembly 
seats, almost twice that nominated by rival parties.  He claimed 
that the PRP had upped the ante and the results of this election 
would force both the Congress and the TDP to also reserve at 
least 100 seats for OBC candidates in future elections. 
 
7.  Political analysts also note that the emergence of the PRP 
altered the standard vote bank equations.  Chiranjeevi saw this 
as the great strength of his party and as the primary reason why 
all other parties would reach out to him after the vote is 
counted.  Just days before the votes were counted, AP Chief 
Secretary P. Ramakanth Reddy quipped that `it's not clear who is 
cutting into whose vote bank.  Everyone draws solace from that 
and predicts that a high turnout is good for them.' 
 
------------------------------------- 
Predictions of a Hung Assembly Undone 
------------------------------------- 
 
8.  Prior to the vote count each main party continued to 
publicly proclaim that they would win an outright majority of 
seats in the State Legislative Assembly and form the next 
government.  Still, most political analysts believed, and exit 
polls predicted, that a hung assembly would be the most likely 
outcome with both Congress and the TDP-led `Grand Alliance' 
bagging from 130-140 seats each and the PRP winning 30-40 
contests.  AP Speaker Suresh Reddy remarked that AP had not seen 
a three-way race since the 1970's and that this `triangular 
contest defied predictions.'  TDP leader Naidu was more 
circumspect noting that after the votes are counted `it may 
still be possible that Congress doesn't have a majority.' 
 
9.  Naidu's hint of pessimism also foreshadowed events at the 
national level.  The `Grand Alliance' fractured in its support 
for the Left-led Third Front even before the vote count.  TRS 
leader K. Chandrashekhar Rao (KCR) publicly called the Third 
Front a `fiction' and declared that he would support the BJP-led 
National Democratic Alliance (NDA) at the center in his quest to 
achieve statehood for the Telangana region.  Naidu informed the 
CDA that the Left parties reacted strongly to the TRS's 
realignment and suggested that the `Grand Alliance' drop the TRS 
at the state level, but he convinced them to temper their 
reaction until after the vote count as party's support could be 
crucial to forming a majority there.  Naidu wasn't concerned 
about the TRS move, since KCR's decision to support the NDA at 
the center precluded the possibility that he would support 
Congress at the state level. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
The Votes Are Counted: Chiranjeevi Plays the Spoiler 
--------------------------------------------- ------- 
 
10.  Once the votes were counted it became clear that the 
YSR-led Congress benefited from the emergence of the PRP.  At a 
post-election party meeting, Naidu claimed that the Congress had 
not won the election, but that new parties had cost the `Grand 
Alliance' crucial anti-Congress votes.  He said that split in 
the oppositions ranks, which the `Grand Alliance' had tried to 
overcome, gave the Congress an undisputed victory even though it 
had received the smallest percentage of votes of any previous 
state government. 
 
11.  Throughout the state, the Congress vote bank remained 
intact while the Telugu Desam lost heavily to the PRP.  Even 
though PRP candidates lost deposits in 22 out of 40 Lok Sabha 
seats contested, in many key Coastal Andhra constituencies they 
polled more than 30,000 votes or one third of potential TDP 
 
HYDERABAD 00000056  003.2 OF 004 
 
 
voters.  A prime example was the Nellore LS constituency where 
the Congress candidate defeated the TDP candidate by 54,994 
votes, while the PRP candidate took third polling more than 
138,000 votes.  In other constituencies Congress candidates won 
by thin margins suggesting that the PRP tilted the results 
(Mummidivaram - 1,851, Bapatla - 1,368, Serlingampalliy - 1,330, 
Rajahumundry City - 1,304, Bodhan - 1,275, Alampur - 1,194, 
Kollapur - 1,194, Jaggampet - 789, Vijayawada Central - 738, 
Paderu - 587, Payakaraopet - 656, Nellimarla - 597, Pinapaka - 
349, Tiruvur - 265, and Penamalur - 153).  Many pundits are 
proclaiming the end of the party since it did not live up to 
initial expectations and only won 17 MLA contests and not a 
single seat in the Lok Sabha.  Still, Chiranjeevi plans to move 
ahead and look to the next election.  Importantly, with almost 
15 percent of the vote across the state, Chiranjeevi's party 
qualifies for recognition and can retain its symbol. 
 
12.  At the state level, the Praja Rajyam delivered a death blow 
to the `Grand Alliance.'  Even though the TDP doubled its seat 
tally from 46 to 93 MLAs, its TRS won a mere 10 of the 44 seats 
it contested (down from 26 in 2004).  [NOTE: Political observers 
also claim that the poor showing of the TRS was the final blow 
to the Telangana-separatist movement. END NOTE] The media widely 
described the performance other coalition members as `dismal' - 
the CPI won four seats and the CPI(M) won only a single one 
versus their previous tallies of six and nine respectively. 
 
--------------------------------- -------------------------- 
The Votes Are Counted: Two Players Emerge From the Sidelines 
--------------------------------------------- --------------- 
 
13.  Even as the BJP candidates lost 267 of 269 Legislative 
Assembly contests and dashed all hope of becoming a `decisive 
force' in the state, two smaller parties showed they could 
significantly impact the final outcome.  The MIM not only 
retained its hereditary Parliamentary seat from Hyderabad, but 
it emerged as an important `unofficial' Congress ally.  Running 
in a secure constituency - Asaduddin Owaisi claimed his seat by 
securing 110,768 more votes than TDP candidate and Siasat 
Editor, Zahid Ali Khan - allowed the MIM candidate to campaign 
`in favor of the Congress' in several Muslim-populated towns in 
Telangana and Coastal Andhra.  Political analysts widely credit 
Owaisi with moving Muslim votes to the Congress en masse.  This 
countered the TDP's strategy of distancing the party from prior 
alliance with the BJP, which Naidu believed was a key factor in 
the 2004 Congress victory. 
 
14.  The Lok Satta Party - another new entrant formed by 
Jayaprakash Narayan, a retired IAS officer turned social and 
political activist - also had an impressive first showing. 
Though the party was only victorious in one state Assembly race, 
it was able to garner significant vote share (over 10 percent) 
in urban constituencies with its advocacy for clean politics and 
promises to usher in a new political culture.  This favored 
Congress by cutting into the urban anti-incumbency vote. 
Importantly, Lok Satta candidates polled more votes than the BJP 
in all the five Hyderabad constituencies.  Elsewhere in the 
state almost five percent of rural voters voted for the party 
and political analysts believe it now has a sufficient base of 
support to build a statewide organization. 
 
----------------------------------------- 
The Votes Are Counted: Splitting Tickets 
---------------------------------------- 
 
15.  One question that has caught the attention of media is the 
disparity between the Congress party's continued dominance in 
Lok Sabha elections and the simple (but lesser) majority it won 
in the state.  While almost 39 percent of voters cast ballots 
for the Congress candidate in parliamentary elections, the 
TDP-led coalition only combined for 34 percent and PRP polled 
more than 15 percent.  [NOTE: The BJP only took 4 percent of the 
vote and the BSP less than one percent. END NOTE] However, in 
the Assembly polls, Congress only received 36 percent, the TDP 
26 percent, TRS 5 percent, CPI(M) 2 percent, and the CPI 1 
percent. 
 
HYDERABAD 00000056  004.2 OF 004 
 
 
 
16.  Citing the poll numbers most media credited the splintering 
of the anti-Congress vote between the `Grand Alliance' and the 
PRP as the primary factor.  However, an academic interlocutor 
noted that the mismatch could be due to the fact that only the 
Congress had a national presence and `agenda' in this concurrent 
election.  For example, in the Visakhapatnam East constituency, 
the TDP Assembly candidate polled 44,233 votes, but the TDP Lok 
Sabha candidate only garnered 34,367 votes.  Given this 
interpretation, the three percent gap between the Congress 
party's parliamentary and Assembly results indicate that some 
voters split their ballot and voted for continuity at the Center 
even as they based their Assembly votes on local issues.  The 
Hindu wrote (May 18, 2009) that, `the fact that 14 [state] 
ministers have tasted defeat sends a strong message that the 
voters, intelligent as they are, preferred a national party but 
are not happy with its functioning at the state.' 
 
--------------------- 
All Support the 1-2-3 
--------------------- 
 
17.  Prior to the vote counting both Naidu and Chiranjeevi 
indicated general, but necessarily unqualified, support for the 
U.S.-India Civil Nuclear Cooperation Agreement.  Chiranjeevi 
told the CDA that prior to the confidence vote last July, he was 
approached about his position by some of the sitting MP's who 
later joined the PRP.  He told them he had `no objection' to the 
agreement, but that they should cast their votes prior to 
leaving their parties to join the PRP.  Naidu predicted that 
there would be no change in foreign policy no matter which 
coalition formed the central government.  While he didn't 
directly voice either reservation or support for the agreement, 
he did note that the Left parties had a visceral hatred for the 
previous U.S. administration and then changed tracks to talk 
about how even they had had to `fall in line' on issues that 
promoted development and created wealth that could later be 
distributed to their constituents. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
Local Politics Carries the Day: Except at the Center 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
 
18.  COMMENT: The strong showing by two new parties may indicate 
that the trend towards coalition governments that include small 
regional (or in this case sub-regional) parties has started to 
make its way to the state assembly level.  Another trend to 
emerge is voters splitting their ballot between different 
parties in national and state contests.  No matter how these 
factors play out in future elections, one constant will remain - 
local issues, especially  development and delivery of social 
welfare programs, will continue to be the focus of the 
electorate and, therefore, of the politicians and their promises 
at election time.  As if on cue, immediately after the results 
were final Congress CM YSR Reddy announced that he would assign 
top priority for five ongoing irrigation projects in the state. 
END COMMENT. 
KEUR