Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09GENEVA458, JUNE 5, 2009 INFORMAL CHAIRMAN'S CONCULTATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09GENEVA458.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09GENEVA458 2009-06-11 08:24 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED US Mission Geneva
R 110824Z JUN 09 ZDK
FM USMISSION GENEVA
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 8602
INFO AMEMBASSY MINSK 
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 
AMEMBASSY BISHKEK 
AMEMBASSY YEREVAN 
AMEMBASSY BAKU 
USEU BRUSSELS
USDOC WASHDC
UNCLAS GENEVA 000458 
 
 
PASS USTR FOR KLEIN, HAFNER 
PASS STATE FOR EUR, EB/TPP-BTA 
PASS USDOC FOR JACOBS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD ECON WTRO USTR BLR
SUBJECT:  JUNE 5, 2009 INFORMAL CHAIRMAN'S CONCULTATIONS 
ON THE WTO ACCESSION OF BELARUS 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED NOT FOR INTERNET DISTRIBUTION 
 
1.   (U) Summary.  Three and a half years after the last such 
meeting, WTO Members met with Belarus to discuss how negotiations 
for its WTO membership might be resumed.  The meeting was called at 
the initiative of the Secretariat and Belarus.  Belarus emphasized 
its interest in encouraging investment and privatization, contended 
that legislation enacted since the hiatus in negotiations was WTO 
consistent, and noted Belarus' increased integration into the 
international trading system (expanding exports through 2008) and 
the ill effects of the global economic crisis (contracting exports 
now).  Several delegations (India, China, Kyrgyzstan) were 
supportive of Belarus' request and suggested that a formal Working 
Party (WP) meeting be scheduled to resume discussions.  Brazil was 
supportive, but more measured, saying that the stage is set for 
resumption, whether formal or informal. A number of other attendees, 
however, including the United States, European Communities and 
Australia emphasized their lingering concern that Belarus was not 
willing to open its market or actually implement WTO-consistent 
trade measures, notwithstanding legislation that might nominally 
conform to WTO provisions.  They insisted that Belarus provide 
improved market access offers on goods and services and information 
on actual implementation of WTO provisions.  Belarus did not respond 
to these points, keeping its comments general.  The United States 
asked Belarus about its planned customs union with Russia and 
Kazakhstan and any possible effects on its accession. [Note: This 
was before Russian Prime Minister Putin's recent comments that 
Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan plan to launch joint negotiations on 
accession to the WTO as a customs union.]  Belarus gave no 
indication that joint negotiations were being envisaged; they only 
noted some coordination among the three countries on WTO-related 
issues.  Delegations will now reflect on the overall discussion and 
submit written questions and requests.  The Chair will consult 
further before attempting to schedQe a formal WP meeting.  See 
paragraphs 7 and 8, below, for Next Steps and a Comment.  End 
Summary. 
 
Background 
 
2.   (SBU) Belarus' negotiations for WTO accession with major WTO 
delegations were effectively suspended in October 2005.  For several 
years, Belarus' approach to the negotiations had been almost totally 
procedural, measuring progress simply by the number meetings held, 
whether or not any agreement was reached on the many issues that 
remain to be resolved.  The Working Party met, delegations spoke, 
Belarus denied there were any issues to discuss, and little progress 
was made.  Belarus frequently complained about how long the 
accession negotiations were taking, but did little to address the 
negotiating requests or systemic concerns of the WP members.  With 
respect to the United States, Belarus declared that it would make no 
further goods offers until Russia had concluded negotiations.  By 
early 2006, the bilateral goods and services offers on the table 
were actually inferior to the ones that Belarus had circulated two 
years earlier and inferior to offers made by Russia.  Then two 
issues arose that brought WP members' frustrations to a head: the 
routine confiscation at the border of imports for trivial or 
nonexistent violations of customs regulations (and their subsequent 
resale in hard currency stores) and the State appropriation of firms 
based on the principle of a state golden share. Concerns raised 
bilaterally and in Geneva were dismissed by Belarus as fabrications 
or misunderstandings, and a significant number of delegations 
withdrew support for further WP meetings and refused to meet on 
market access issues until (a) there were substantially improved 
offers, and (b) delegations had sufficient information on the golden 
share issue and customs confiscations and responses to questions 
tabled.  Periodic informal consultations during 2006-2008 called by 
the WP Chairman, Swedish Ambassador to the WTO Mia Horn, confirmed 
this approach.  Belarus has provided information stating that it has 
abolished the problematic practices at the border and eliminated the 
concept of (quote) golden share (unquote) in its investment laws. 
Based on Belarus' statements to the WTO and the Secretariat and the 
Chairman's interest in resuming work on a different basis, WTO 
delegations agreed to an informal meeting to assess Belarus' 
sincerity and prospects for further work on the accession. 
 
Pre-Meeting with the Chair 
 
3.   (SBU) In a meeting prior to the scheduled informal consultation 
with Belarus, the United States, European Communities, Norway, 
Japan, and Australia met with Chairwoman Mia Horn to discuss 
viewpoints on the status of the accession.  The WTO Secretariat did 
not attend this meeting. Attendees were unanimous that more credible 
offers on goods and services are needed, that more evidence of 
implementation of legislation is needed, and more work on 
legislation, in areas such as import licensing, copyright, etc., is 
needed.  The United States confirmed that we would need to assess 
the information provided at this meeting and further inputs from 
Belarus in terms of offers, legislative action plan, checklists on 
TBT, TRIPs, SPS, etc., and responses to questions from members 
before resuming work. 
 
Informal Chairman's Consultations: 
 
4.    (U) Deputy Foreign Minister Andrei Yeudachenka led the 
Belarussian delegation in the informal session.  In opening remarks, 
he provided a brief overview of Belarus' efforts to date, focused on 
broad economic indicators, rather than progress on specific WTO 
disciplines.  He stressed Belarus' efforts to move into the global 
economy, noting that its exports had grown from 10 to 34 USD billion 
from 2003 to 2008.  He also pointed to difficulties that Belarus 
faced as a result of the global financial crisis, in particular, 
falling exports.  He concluded by noting that it had been three and 
a half years since the last Working Party on Belarus' accession. 
The EC and US stressed that improved offers and a great deal more 
information across various areas is essential to gauge Belarus' 
seriousness before next steps can be determined.   The US flagged 
concerns about recent tariff increases on agricultural and 
industrial goods and import bans imposed on pork and otherQoducts 
based on an erroneous understanding of the H1N1 virus.  On 
multilateral issues, the United States asked questions related to 
SPS matters and flagged questions that we would table related to 
IPR, the relationship between Belarus' activity in customs union and 
the accession process, and alcohol licensing, among other issues. 
The EC focused its remarks on the areas of burdensome customs 
procedures, licensing regime, and continuing lack of transparency. 
Australia supported the US and EC comments.  Members such as India, 
China, Kyrgyzstan indicated that they viewed substantial changes 
have taken place in the last several years in Belarus and that they 
were supportive of resuming the Working Party process as soon as 
possible.  Brazil noted that they have not finalized their bilateral 
negotiations, but that they have resumed engagement.  Ukraine did 
not make an intervention. 
 
5.   (SBU) In his initial responses to members, Yeudachenka provided 
general information only, insisting that International Monetary Fund 
and World Bank reports and consultations with the EC in the context 
of the Eastern Partnership Program have provided opportunities for 
further transparency about both legislation and current practices. 
Yeudachenka stressed that Belarus is (quote) trying to be 
transparent (unquote).  He stressed Belarus' interest in attracting 
foreign investment and efforts to privatize 600 entities in the next 
several years.  The Belarussian delegation throughout the meeting 
welcomed further questions and offered to respond to them.   Anton 
Kudasov, Deputy Director of Directorate of Foreign Economic Affairs, 
MFA, and a veteran of Belarus' accession efforts, responded on 
substantive issues.  Kudasov noted that the legislative action plan 
submitted earlier has been fully implemented.    He asserted that 
(quote) lack of credibility in tariff offers is subjective (unquote) 
and stressed that while most members are satisfied with their 
offers, the difficulty lies with two delegations - the European 
Communities and the United States.  He took more direct aim at the 
EC, noting that Belarus had made four offers to the EC since 2005 
and that Belarus needs concrete direction back from the EC.  Kudasov 
concluded that they are in the middle of their overall effort with 
members in concluding bilateral goods and services negotiatiQ.  At 
present, they have completed discussions with nine delegations and 
are in discussions still with another 12.   They hope to conclude 
negotiations with three more Members in the course of 2009.  He made 
no promises about revised offers. Turning to multilateral issues, he 
noted that Belarus intends to implement WTO commitments in most 
cases, with some (unspecified) exceptions. On the customs union, he 
noted that there is work going on with Russia, Kazakhstan to 
negotiate and establish a single customs tariff. They are currently 
attempting to eliminate impediments to trade between them.  He 
insisted that Belarus will pursue the customs union in accordance 
with GATT Article XXIV.  [Note: The Belarussians did not indicate, 
as President Putin did on June 8 at the Eurasian Economic Community 
Meetings, that Russia, Kazakhstan and Belarus intend to launch joint 
WTO negotiations as a customs union.  Kudasov indicated only that 
there is inter-state coordination and stressed the importance of 
both their deepening integration with Russia and the CIS as well as 
with the European Union. In a follow-up call with the Belarussian 
mission to the WTO in Geneva on June 10, Second Secretary Aleksandr 
Tselyuk indicated that they were awaiting instructions from capital 
on the Putin announcement, their negotiators were only returning 
from the Eurasian Economic Meetings today and that the announcement 
was (quote) quite unexpected (unquote).  End note.] 
 
6.   (U) Responding to the U.S. question concerning recent sharp 
tariff increases, Kudasov insisted that Belarus is not going to take 
any protectionist measures in relation to trade.  He said that the 
tariff increases should be viewed in the contact of an overall 
package, which also included tariff reductions on goods needed as 
inputs for their industry.  He claimed that the industrial goods 
increases are temporary, and will last for nine months, while the 
agricultural tariff increases will last for six months and offered 
to provide additional information if questions are submitted in 
writing.  He questioned what specifically the EC is referring to in 
relation to double licensing concerns and asked for evidence.   An 
unnamed representative from Belarus' customs agency provided brief 
comments that they have taken 27 governmental decisions with the aim 
of adhering to World Customs Organization convention by the end of 
this year.  They are updating information technology systems to 
cover 50 percent of exports declared by the end of the year.  He 
challenged the EC and US representatives to clearly specify their 
remaining concerns regarding customs valuation and procedures and 
insisted that Belarus has implemented GATT-consistent legislation. 
In response to another U.S. question about the status of import bans 
on pork in relation to the H1N1 virus, Kudasov said the situation 
remains fluid.  Currently a ban is in place and Belarus is expecting 
a guarantee from trading partners that the virus is not transferable 
from animals to humans.  He noted that their own meat sector is 
export dependent and that their main market for exports is Russia, 
whose SPS regime is quote evolving unquote.  While they have a 
vested interest in meeting WTO SPS requirements for imports, they 
need to ensure they maintain access to their export markets. 
 
Next Steps 
 
7.     (U) In her conclusion, the Chairwoman suggested that members 
submit further questions in writing.  Belarus needs to take several 
concrete steps: 1) update its legislative action plan; 2) provide 
updated checklists related to customs valuation, TBT, SPS, import 
licensing and TRIPs; 3) reply in writing to members' questions.  She 
observed that responses could provide input for a more fulsome 
factual summary to be prepared by the Secretariat.  She encouraged 
members to make more progress in their bilateral work.  The Chair 
insisted that the timing of any next consultations should remain 
open and subject to consultations with members once they receive 
these inputs from Minsk.  Deputy Minister Yeudachenka made a plea 
for a deadline for members' submission of questions and for 
consideration to be given to setting a date for a fall Working 
Party.  Chairwoman Horn held firm that more consultations are needed 
on the inputs.  The EC and US supported the Chair's next steps. 
 
8.   (SBU) Comment.  While Deputy Minister Yeudachenka's upbeat and 
cooperative tone was a decided change from his predecessors more 
defensive stance, neither he nor Kudasov made any unilateral 
commitments to address delegations concerns, or even to comply with 
the request for improved offers.  We hope for something more 
tangible in the written responses.  The delay in Belarus' accession 
has put it the position of having many new WTO Members join the 
negotiations, like WTO member Ukraine, who attended the meeting but 
did not speak, and possibly WTO accession applicant Russia, whose 
accession process is in its late stages.  We will transmit the 
relevant WTO documents and  our written questions to post 
separately, and look forward both to post's comments and to any 
information provided in the course of normal reporting on the issues 
raised in these materials.  End Comment.  End 
 
Allgeier