VZCZCXRO4062
OO RUEHAP RUEHDT RUEHKN RUEHKR RUEHMJ RUEHPB
DE RUEHC #0301/01 3461944
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 111927Z DEC 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHAP/AMEMBASSY APIA IMMEDIATE 1281
RUEHBD/AMEMBASSY BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN IMMEDIATE 7778
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK IMMEDIATE 6994
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING IMMEDIATE 4703
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 3136
RUEHDT/AMEMBASSY DILI IMMEDIATE 5305
RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI IMMEDIATE 8283
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA IMMEDIATE 2049
RUEHKN/AMEMBASSY KOLONIA IMMEDIATE 1919
RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR IMMEDIATE 1539
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR IMMEDIATE 0470
RUEHMJ/AMEMBASSY MAJURO IMMEDIATE 6569
RUEHML/AMEMBASSY MANILA IMMEDIATE 8993
RUEHPF/AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH IMMEDIATE 8914
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY IMMEDIATE 1378
RUEHGO/AMEMBASSY RANGOON IMMEDIATE 7848
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL IMMEDIATE 9474
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE IMMEDIATE 9798
RUEHSV/AMEMBASSY SUVA IMMEDIATE 7549
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO IMMEDIATE 7099
RUEHUM/AMEMBASSY ULAANBAATAR IMMEDIATE 6632
RUEHVN/AMEMBASSY VIENTIANE IMMEDIATE 3810
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON IMMEDIATE 6417
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG IMMEDIATE 6037

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 22 STATE 130301 
 
SIPDIS 
FOR: CHIEFS OF MISSION AND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS FROM EAP ASSISTANT 
SECRETARY CHRISTOPHER R. HILL 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ABUD AFIN AMGT EAID KICA KSEP KSPR PREL EAP
SUBJECT: CORRECTED COPY: CONSOLIDATED FY 2011 MISSION 
STRATEGIC PLAN GUIDANCE FOR EAST ASIA AND THE PACIFIC 
 
¶1. Summary: The following cable provides consolidated 
guidance from Washington to missions for the preparation 
of FY 2011 Mission Strategic Plans (MSP). This cable is 
divided into the following sections: Regional Bureau 
Guidance; Bureau of Resource Management (RM), Office of 
Strategic and Performance Planning Overview and Guidance; 
Functional Bureau Guidance; and Management Bureau 
Guidance.  End Summary 
 
¶2. REGIONAL BUREAU GUIDANCE: Bureau of East Asian and 
Pacific Affairs Policy Overview and Guidance: 
Mission Strategic Plans are the first step in the annual 
strategic planning process of the EAP Bureau, as well as 
of the Department.   As in previous years, your "Business 
Plan" should define your mission's most important goals 
and clearly articulate and justify the resources required 
to achieve those goals.  In an increasingly constrained 
budget environment, it is essential that MSPs establish 
clear links between U.S. foreign policy goals and resource 
requirements, and provide a clear sense of the relative 
priority of each resource request.  The MSPs will serve as 
source documents for policy and program briefs as well as 
become the basis for development of the EAP Bureau 
Strategic Plan (BSP) and our subsequent requests for state 
operations and foreign operations funding.  Please consult 
the FY 2010 EAP MSP as a reference in preparing your own 
FY 2011 MSP. Interagency coordination via the country team 
is essential to ensure that appropriate prioritization of 
foreign assistance requests has been achieved.  EAP's 
ability to successfully prepare and defend missions' 
resource requests throughout subsequent phases of the 
budget cycle is greatly dependent upon the strength 
of your justifications.  Resource requests which are 
submitted subsequent to the MSP submission, or which 
may primarily reflect individual agency priorities 
are much less likely to receive favorable treatment. 
Please also note that some foreign assistance programs 
are centrally allocated based upon global strategy. 
Please ensure to account for any policy 
priorities that may bring emergent resource requests with 
them.  Finally, please take into account the growing 
priorities of climate change, food security and energy 
security, detailing these priorities where relevant in the 
Chief of Mission Statement, Foreign Assistance Paper and 
resource request tables.eive favorable treatment.  Please 
also note that some foreign assistance programs are 
centrally allocated based upon global strategy. Please 
ensure to account for any policy priorities that may bring 
emergent resource requests with them.  Finally, please 
take into account the growing priorities of climate 
change, food security and energy security, detailing these 
priorities where relevant in the Chief of Mission 
Statement, Foreign Assistance Paper and resource request 
tables. 
 
¶3. MSP OVERVIEW AND GUIDANCE: Planning is critical to 
implement foreign policy goals, as well as to ensure 
accountability to Congress and the American people.  The 
MSPs will continue to define how mission activities 
support overarching USG foreign policy goals. 
 
¶4. MSPs will capture high-level diplomatic and foreign 
assistance priorities, resource needs, and performance 
 
STATE 00130301  002 OF 022 
 
 
data.  The MSP should be an interagency, country team 
effort that will serve as the forward planning tool for 
overseas missions.  The MSP is the first step in a robust 
annual planning and performance evaluation process that 
contributes to the Department's results oriented 
performance efforts. For this cycle, the MSPs will inform 
the FY 2011 State Operations and Foreign Operations budget 
requests, including mission-specific increases/decreases 
in U.S. Direct Hire positions. 
 
¶5. The web-based MSP application allows direct input and 
submission of all narrative and resource information. 
Mission personnel will obtain access to the MSP 
application from their mission's designated MSP 
Coordinator.  The MSP Coordinator will ensure that all 
sections of the plan are properly completed before the MSP 
is formally submitted to Washington.  Software user 
instructions will be available on the MSP website which is 
found at http://spp.rm.state.gov/spp800X600template.cf m?id=8. 
 
MSP Coordinator instructions on granting MSP user access will 
be sent several weeks before the MSP launch in early 
December 2008. The MSPs will be due to Washington on 
February 2, 2009.  To keep the MSPs concise, fixed text 
limits have been established for each of the narrative and 
resource request justification sections.  A 24/7 help desk 
service will be provided during the peak MSP drafting and 
submission period. 
 
¶6. There are several notable modifications to the MSP for 
FY 2011: 
-     Strategic Goal Allocation - The allocation of 
U.S. Direct-Hire Time by strategic goal has been 
eliminated. 
-     U.S. Direct-Hire Human Resource Requests - 
Missions will enter position support costs for individual 
requests in the Human Resources request screen. 
-     Performance Results - Missions will enter 
performance results relative to the FY 2008 performance 
targets. 
-     Previous Year Chief of Mission Statement and 
Foreign Assistance Priorities Narrative Pre-populated - 
Missions have the ability to pre-populate the FY 2011 MSP 
application with the previous year's Chief of Mission 
Statement and Foreign Assistance Priorities Narrative. 
-     Foreign Assistance Requests - Funding requests will be 
collected only at the area level except for the Investing 
in People objective.  For this objective only, Missions 
will enter Foreign Assistance request levels at the 
element level. 
-     Summary of Foreign Assistance Request - A revised 
Foreign Assistance Summary table will replace the one-page 
summary of the Foreign Assistance Resource Request. 
-     The Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor 
Democracy Strategies Requirement -All posts in 
non-democratic and democratic transition countries are 
required to incorporate their ADVA democracy strategy into 
their MSP.  This replaces last year's requirement for a 
stand alone ADVA democracy strategy paper. 
 
¶7. Global Partnership Clearinghouse: The Global 
Partnership Center (GPC) leads efforts to promote the use 
of public-private partnerships (PPPs) to advance U.S. 
international affairs objectives. The GPC is a resource to 
assist Mission and Bureau efforts to collaboratively 
engage the private sector, foundations, civil society and 
others through partnerships. Created by the GPC, the 
Global Partnership Clearinghouse, is the first-ever 
 
STATE 00130301  003 OF 022 
 
 
database of PPPs engaged under Chief of Mission 
authority.  The Clearinghouse was launched for the first 
time in association with the FY 2010 MSP and BSP processes 
and, thanks to the strong support from Mission 
coordinators, captured information on more than 640 PPPs. 
Again this year, in association with the FY 2011 MSP 
process, the GPC will gather information on existing and 
planned multi-sector partnerships in which post is engaged 
under Chief of Mission authority. The Clearinghouse 
gathers PPP information through a custom, online 
application and can be accessed via the same webpage 
 as the MSP application. Additional information regarding 
the Global Partnership Center will be posted at 
http://gpc.state.gov/. Please direct any questions 
regarding the Clearinghouse to GPC@State.gov. 
Clearinghouse data is available to assist Missions and may 
also be requested by email to GPC@State.gov. 
 
¶8. Democracy Strategy Requirement: In accordance with 
Title XXI of P.L. 110-53, the Advancing Democratic Values 
Act (ADVA) of 2007 and with National Security Policy 
Directive-58  signed by the President in July 2008, all 
posts in non-democratic and democratic transition 
countries are required to incorporate their democracy strat 
egy into their MSP. The required democracy strategies are 
to be forward-looking three to five years and should be 
incorporated into four parts of the MSP: the COM 
statement, the GJD Goal Paper, the Foreign Assistance 
priorities narrative section, and the Foreign Assistance 
and State Ops budget request section. 
 
¶9. This replaces last year's requirement for a stand alone 
ADVA democracy strategy paper. It is designed to minimize 
the burden on posts and the Department while integrating 
the democracy strategy into the Mission Strategic Plan 
itself.  (Note: The Advancing Freedom and Democracy Report 
- AFDR - is not affected by this and will remain as an 
annual reporting requirement.) Additional information 
regarding the Democracy Strategy requirement will be poste 
d at http://drl.state.gov/Please direct any questions 
regarding the requirement to pf-DRL-Reports@State.gov 
(listed in the GAL as DRL-Reports). 
 
¶10. MSP SECTIONS AND RESOURCE REQUEST GUIDANCE 
The MSP contains the following sections: Chief of Mission 
Statement; Foreign Assistance Priorities; Goal Papers; 
U.S. Direct Hire Requests; State Operations Resource 
Requests; and Foreign Assistance Resource Requests. 
 
¶11. Chief of Mission (COM) Statement: The COM Statement 
should focus on the mission's most important foreign 
policy priorities for the planning period, FY 2009-2011, 
and should serve as the MSP's Executive Summary.  The COM 
Statement should reference the highest priority resource 
requests for FY 2011 (Foreign Assistance, State 
Operations, and U.S. Direct Hires) and justify why and how 
these requests are critical to achieving mission and 
bureau goals.  Past accomplishments should be included 
only if they set the strategic context for future mission 
goals and resource needs.  The COM Statement can include 
information such as historical factors if relevant to 
current foreign policy goals, and should provide a summary 
of USG presence and any projected staffing changes for all 
agencies under Chief of Mission authority.  The COM 
Statement is limited to four pages. 
 
¶12. For ADVA Non-Democratic and Democratic Transition 
Countries: 
 
STATE 00130301  004 OF 022 
 
 
In addition to the guidance above and to comply with the 
Advancing Democratic Values Act (ADVA) and NSPD-58, the 
COM Statement for all non-democratic and 
democratic transition country posts should incorporate a 
description of post's democracy strategy that is broadly 
consistent with the strategic approaches appropriate for 
"threatened and fragile democracies", "authoritarian 
regimes" or "closed totalitarian" regimes as outlined in 
the NSPD-58.strategy that is broadly consistent with the 
strategic approaches appropriate for "threatened and 
fragile democracies", "authoritarian regimes" or "closed 
totalitarian" regimes as outlined in the NSPD-58. 
 
¶13. The COM democracy statement should:  (1) describe the 
democracy results you think are desirable and 
realistically possible if the diplomatic and assistance 
strategy you propose is implemented as planned in the 
three to five year time frame; (2) identify the major 
democracy issues or problems that need to be addressed in 
the country; (3) describe the opportunities for progress 
and the consequences of failing to address these issues; 
and (4) describe the diplomatic and assistance tools 
needed to overcome the major democracy issues and how 
these mutually reinforce each other. 
 
¶14. Foreign Assistance Priorities: This narrative section 
should be completed only by missions requesting FY 2011 
Foreign Assistance funding.  It should complement the COM 
Statement by providing more specific details on the 
mission's Foreign Assistance priorities within the context 
of the overall mission goals outlined in the COM 
Statement, and justify why and how the requests in the 
Foreign Assistance Resource Request Table are critical to 
achieving the mission's goals.  The foreign assistance 
narrative also must be consistent with the mission's 
democracy strategy as described in the COM statement and 
the GJD Goal paper and note how US democracy assistance 
complements, supplements or differs from other bilateral 
or multilateral assistance.  Providing specific examples 
of how program performance has influenced the request is 
encouraged. Discussion of priorities should be organized 
by the Foreign Assistance Framework's five strategic 
objectives (Peace and Security, Governing Justly and 
Democratically, Investing in 
 People, Economic Growth, and Humanitarian Assistance). 
There is no specific format required beyond the general 
organization noted above, though it is limited to three 
pages. 
 
¶15. Goal Papers: Missions may write up to a total of seven 
goal papers and will be able to utilize goal papers 
carried over from the FY 2010 MSP or create entirely new 
ones.  The key components of the Goal Papers are as 
follows: 
 
¶16. Posts in non-democratic and democratic transition 
countries must submit a GJD goal paper. The GJD Goal paper 
should be a succinct summary statement of the GJD goals 
and the broad strategy to reach those goals. 
-- Goal Title: Missions should craft their own customized, 
mission-oriented goal statements.  The Goal Title can be 
broad or specific, but should focus on the mission's most 
important USG foreign policy priorities.  The Goal Title 
is limited to one line of text and will populate the Table 
of Contents. 
-- Goal Description: After defining a goal, missions 
should enter a more detailed goal description, outlining 
why achieving the goal is important to the U.S. and how 
 
STATE 00130301  005 OF 022 
 
 
the mission will accomplish this goal (i.e., what 
strategies will various mission elements pursue to achieve 
the desired results).  Missions may wish to discuss other 
related activities such as: how they work with foreign 
partners, regional or international organizations, and 
NGOs; the long-term nature of the goal; external factors 
that could influence achieving the goal; etc. 
-- Department Goal Linkage: Missions will link each 
customized goal to up to three State/USAID Strategic Goals 
through a drop-down menu.  Missions may link their goal to 
any of the State/USAID Strategic Goals as outlined in the 
FY 2007-2012 Department of State and USAID Strategic 
Plan. 
-- USG Agencies: From a drop-down menu, missions will 
select key USG agencies that have a role in helping to 
accomplish the customized mission goal. 
-- Performance Indicator(s): For each customized goal, 
missions are required to include only one performance 
indicator, with an option for a second.  Indicators should 
focus on the accomplishment of the mission's high-level 
foreign policy goals, and not solely on assistance. 
Missions are encouraged (although not required) to include 
quantifiable and outcome-oriented indicators whenever 
possible.  Missions may include a mix of indicators that 
are within the mission's control and those more contextual 
in nature, such as the Freedom House Index.  However, 
indicators are most useful when they can be linked to 
either existing or proposed resource requests.  Missions 
are encouraged to continue to use priority indicators from 
last year's MSP.  Performance indicator captions are 
limited to three lines of text and should be phrased as neu 
tral measures, not as outcomes, e.g. number of 
international treaties and domestic initiatives 
implemented in support of USG global climate change policy 
objectives.  Additional Fore 
ign Operations performance data will also be collected 
separately. Details to follow. 
-- Performance Targets and Results:  Missions will set 
performance targets for FY 2009, FY 2010, and FY 2011 for 
each performance indicator.  If a mission utilizes previo 
us MSP indicators, they should include the previous FY 
2008 target and a FY 2008 result.  Performance targets and 
results are limited to eight lines of text each.  In an 
effort to clarify mission performance RM/SPP has created a 
drop-down menu in the MSP application where missions will 
enter a performance rating relative to the FY 2008 
performance indicator target.  The FY 2008 result is 
considered "on target" only when the target was reached 
exactly as stated or "above target" if exceeded. Results 
which are lower than the target, but improved over prior 
year's performance should be labeled as "improved over 
prior, but not met." Results that do not meet target and 
do not improve over prior year, should be labeled as 
"below target." Finally, data that is not available at the 
time of publication of the report, e.g., collected later 
in the year 
or every other year or a new measure is created, should be 
labeled "data not yet available." 
 
¶17. RESOURCE TABLES.  Included within the resource tables 
are the following: U.S. Direct Hire Requests, State 
Operations Resource Requests, and Foreign Assistance 
Resource Requests.  Funding increase requests should be 
focused on highest priority, critical areas and be 
supported by sufficient justification that can be reviewed 
for potential support by senior Department management. 
 
¶18. U.S. Direct Hire Requests: Missions will include 
 
STATE 00130301  006 OF 022 
 
 
position information and succinct justifications for each 
FY 2011 State-funded position request.  Justifications 
will be limited to ten lines.  U.S. personnel requested 
for other U.S. agencies are also included in this table; 
however one justification is entered at the agency-level 
rather than for each requested position.  The most 
important staffing needs should also be highlighted in the 
COM statement and linked to critical mission priorities or 
operational requirements. 
 
¶19. Missions will enter position support costs for 
individual requests in the Human Resources request 
screen.  Use the following guidelines to determine the 
position support costs for new USDH human resource 
requests: 
 
¶20. Position Support Costs (not including OBO and DS 
Position Support Costs) 
-     Recurring Cost - non-salary and benefits position 
support costs (not including OBO and DS Position Support 
Costs) that are incurred repeatedly; for example, 
educational allowances and field travel. 
-     Non-Recurring Cost - non-salary and benefits 
position support costs (not including OBO and DS Position 
Support Costs) that are unlikely to occur again in the 
normal course of business; for example, new office 
furniture, fixtures and equipment and make ready/move-in 
expenses. 
 
¶21. OBO Position Support Costs 
-     Recurring OBO Costs -non-salary position support 
costs that are incurred repeatedly; for example, 
residential leases. 
-     Non-Recurring OBO Costs - non-salary position 
support costs that are unlikely to occur again in the 
normal course of business; for example, generators for a 
new residence. 
 
¶22. DS Position Support Costs 
-     Recurring DS Costs- non-salary position support 
costs that are incurred repeatedly; for example, 
allowances, residential guards, mobile patrols, ICASS 
costs, utilities, etc. 
-     Non-Recurring DS Costs - non-salary position 
support costs that are unlikely to occur again in the 
normal course of business; for example residential 
security upgrades for a new residence, furniture, 
furnishings, and equipment purchases.  (Note that funding 
for a replacement life cycle would need to be established 
for certain large equipment purchases such as vehicles.) 
 
¶23. Missions will also be asked to determine a 
"responsible bureau" for each new USDH position request. 
The "responsible bureau" is the bureau responsible for 
deciding if that position should be created and requested 
in the CBJ.  Funding is considered separately in different 
fields.    The responsible bureau field will be edited in 
Washington in the event that a correction must be made. 
 
¶24. This section will display previous year MSP State 
position requests and the regional bureau's decisions 
during the Bureau Strategic Planning process to approve or 
deny the request. If previous requests were not included 
in the FY 2009 or FY 2010 budget submissions, posts may 
resubmit them as FY 2011 requests. As in previous years, 
FY 2011 position requests will be reviewed by regional 
bureau EX offices prior to transmittal to HR and RM/BP. 
A summary FY 2011 U.S. Direct Hire Requests table will be 
 
STATE 00130301  007 OF 022 
 
 
included in the submitted MSP. 
 
¶25. Human Resources Summary: The human resources summary 
table is organized by section (e.g. POL, ECON, MGMT). 
Other USG positions are not required though they will 
appear in the summary printed table.  The total number of 
FY 2009 FTEs by section will be pre-populated into the MSP 
from HR's PASS Post Personnel (PS) system.  Use of Post 
Personnel source data will ensure consistent position 
counts, eliminate the need for posts to maintain separate 
data, and be consistent with the policy mandate that the 
PS application be the Gold Standard for reporting overseas 
positions.  Any inconsistencies in HR numbers should be 
corrected directly in the PS system.  Direct inquiries to 
PassHelpDeskMail@state.gov or 202 647-7760. 
 
¶26. State Operations Resource Requests: This section 
includes separate account tables for FY 2011 Program, 
ICASS, and PD, and Fee-Funded (position support costs 
only) increases/decreases.  Missions will request FY 2011 
account increases/decreases by funding category.  Missions 
will include one total funding request and combined 
justification for each category by account. 
 
¶27. At the end of each account table, missions can discuss 
FY 2011 resource priorities in a short narrative section. 
The priority statement will inform regional bureau 
decision-making process. A summary FY 2011 State 
Operations Resource Requests table will be included in the 
printed MSP. 
 
¶28. Use the following guidelines to determine changes to 
state operations funding. (Missions will enter position 
support costs for individual requests in the Human 
Resources request screen.): 
-     LES (Salary and Benefits) -Recurring Cost- specific 
salary, benefits and new support costs of NEW locally 
engaged staff request(s) and FY 2011 LES wage 
increase(s).  Narrative justification should provide a 
specific basis for the request; indicate the need that 
will be addressed with the funding; and specify 
position(s) by grade and a breakdown of the total cost for 
EACH position. 
-     Furniture and Equipment - Non-Recurring 
Cost-funding for the purchase of new furniture and office 
equipment for existing employees.  Furniture and equipment 
costs for new positions are defined in the Position 
Support Costs funding categories.  Narrative justification 
should provide a basis for the request; indicate the need 
that will be addressed with the funding; and a breakdown 
of the total cost for each major item(s). 
-     Other-Recurring Cost- all recurring State 
Operations INCREASES that are not covered in other State 
Operations funding categories. Narrative justification 
should provide a basis for the request; indicate the need 
that will be addressed with the funding; and a breakdown 
of the total cost for each major item(s). 
-     Other-Non-recurring Cost- all non-recurring State 
Operations INCREASES that are not covered in other State 
Operations funding categories. Narrative justification 
should provide a basis for the request; indicate the need 
that will be addressed with the funding; and a breakdown 
of the total cost for each item(s). 
-     Vehicles -Non Recurring Cost (ICASS only)-funding 
for the purchase of any new vehicles for existing 
employees.  Narrative justification should indicate the 
need that will be addressed with the new vehicle(s). 
 
 
STATE 00130301  008 OF 022 
 
 
¶29. Within the MSP software application, missions can view 
the FY 2010 MSP requests and bureau decisions.  Missions 
should consult with their bureaus on whether these 
positions have been incorporated into subsequent FY 
2009-2010 budget requests, and may choose to re-request a 
category item requested, but not granted previously and 
should re-enter this information as a new FY 2011 
request. 
 
¶30. Classification and Distribution: MSPs are considered 
internal deliberative documents, classified as Sensitive 
But Unclassified, and will not be distributed beyond 
agencies represented at the mission.  The Chief of Mission 
Statement is the definitive strategy document for the 
mission and may receive wider internal distribution than 
the other MSP components. 
 
¶31. Missions are strongly encouraged to share their MSPs, 
at the very least the COM Statement, with the appropriate 
contacts, including Polads, within the geographic 
combatant commands.  As part of the ongoing discussions in 
a sub-PCC working group on planning there is a strong 
consensus on the importance of civilian and military 
planners informing each other of country and regional 
level priorities. 
 
32.OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF U.S. FOREIGN ASSISTANCE 
GUIDANCE: 
This section provides details about the requirements and 
information needed for field-based operating units with 
foreign assistance (FA) funding to prepare their FY 2011 
foreign assistance resource requests.  It contains 
important changes to the FA resource request process, 
particularly regarding budget preparation and submissions 
for regional platforms.  The key changes to the guidance 
include: 
(a) The "Freeze" level will be the straightline of the FY 
2010 S-Approved level (formerly the "Constrained" level). 
(b) The "Mission Request" level will be the mission 
expanded request (formerly the "Preferred" level). 
(c) Control levels (pre-set funding levels) will be 
incorporated into the "Freeze" table by Operating Unit by 
Account, and funding for certain centrally-allocated 
activities and accounts will be locked into both the 
"Freeze" and "Mission Request" tables. 
(d) Cross-cutting Activities Table is no longer required. 
(e) Cross-Cutting Program Support (Objective 6) will not 
be broken out as part of either the "Freeze" or "Mission 
Request" levels at this time. 
(f) Performance Indicators will be required to justify 
requests for significant increases over the "Freeze" 
level.  See paragraph 27 for more details. 
(g) The USAID-Managed Resources Table is no longer 
required. 
 
33.All key documents, including budget levels, templates, 
points of contact and additional information resources 
necessary for completing FA requests are available through 
the FA link on the MSP help page. 
 
¶34. Resource Tables:  Operating Units will develop two FA 
resource request tables for their FY 2011 submissions. 
The first table, the "Freeze" table, cannot exceed the FY 
2010 S-Approved level for that mission.  The second table, 
the "Mission Request" should correspond more closely to FA 
needs and is not limited to the "Freeze" level.  Account 
controls will be incorporated into the "Freeze" table but 
there are no account controls in the "Mission Request" 
 
STATE 00130301  009 OF 022 
 
 
table, except as noted below. Control numbers for certain 
centrally-allocated activities and accounts will be locked 
into both the "Freeze" and "Mission Request" tables. 
Operating Units are encouraged to submit reasonable 
requests that expand successful programs or fund new 
programs where significant funding constraints have 
existed.  Information on earmarks, centrally-allocated 
activities and accounts, and Presidential Initiatives are 
available through the FA link on the MSP help page. 
 
¶35. While FA requests included in MSPs serve as the 
foundation for the FY 2011 foreign assistance request 
process, there is no guarantee that Operating Units will 
receive funding at either the Freeze or Mission Request 
levels, or that the approved budget distributions will 
match MSP submissions. 
 
¶36. Although the MSP application allows Operating Units to 
request Transition Initiatives (TI) funding, as a rule 
Operating Units should not request funding from this 
account.  For guidance on other restricted accounts and 
activities, see the Freeze Request and Mission Request 
paragraphs below. 
 
¶37. Freeze Request Table:  The Freeze request total must 
maintain funding at the 2010 S-Approved Level by Operating 
Unit.  In the Freeze request, Operating Units should 
distribute the total Freeze request level across accounts, 
and then allocate those account amounts down to the area 
level (element for IIP).  Note that, except as specified 
below, there are no control levels on specific accounts. 
Operating Units may generally make adjustments within and 
between Program Area, (Program Element for the Investing 
in People Objective), and account levels, provided that 
the total amount requested for the mission does not exceed 
its total control level.  Funding levels for the following 
centrally-allocated activities and accounts will be 
pre-loaded and locked into the Freeze Table: 
-     Non-Emergency Food Aid (P.L. 480) 
-     HIV/AIDS (all accounts) 
-     Malaria 
 
¶38. Mission Request Table:  The Mission Request table can 
be used to request funding for FY 2011 above the total 
Freeze level, either to expand successful programs or fund 
new programs where significant funding constraints exist. 
Operating Units should be reasonable in their requests. 
In reviewing these requests, F reviewers in Washington 
will be particularly interested in determining how past 
performance informs requests for changes in resource 
levels.  Significant increases must be justified using 
performance indicators (see paragraph 27).  Funding for 
the following centrally-allocated activities and accounts 
will be pre-loaded and locked into the Mission Request 
Table: 
-     Non-Emergency Food Aid (P.L. 480) 
-     HIV/AIDS (all accounts) 
-     Malaria 
 
¶39. Operating Units are also encouraged at a minimum to 
adhere to the Freeze levels for the following activities 
that were funded in FY 2010 due to the likelihood that 
these items will be earmarked or centrally-allocated. 
-     Export Control and Border Security Assistance 
      (NADR account) 
-     Anti-Terrorism Assistance (NADR account) 
-     Terrorist Interdiction Program (NADR account) 
-     Counterterrorism Financing (NADR account) 
 
STATE 00130301  010 OF 022 
 
 
-     Family Planning and Reproductive Health 
-     Polio (the Maternal and Child Health element must at a 
      minimum cover Polio) 
-     Tuberculosis 
 
¶40. While Missions are expected to adhere to the 
pre-loaded and locked Freeze and Request levels, they can 
comment on the levels being too high or two low and the 
probable result/impact of these levels. 
Foreign Assistance Priorities Narratives:  Ongoing Foreign 
Assistance reforms aim to strengthen accountability for 
the performance and strategic impact of the Foreign 
Assistance budget.  While we can expect many activities to 
produce important short-term results, it is also critical 
to demonstrate that Foreign Assistance contributes to 
strategic long-term progress - so that recipients are 
increasingly able to assume responsibility for meeting 
their own needs, are able to act responsibly in the 
international system, and are decreasingly dependent on 
U.S. and other external assistance over time.  It is 
recognized that this strategic progress requires sustained 
effort by both donors and recipients, and is not easily 
measured within a one-year budget planning cycle. 
 
¶41. As one step toward improving accountability for 
program performance, each Mission is required to provide a 
narrative explaining the strategic basis for its FY 2011 
Foreign Assistance priorities. An example of an FA 
priorities narrative will be available on the FA link on 
the MSP help page.  Narratives should include the 
following: 
a) Summarize the Mission's core strategic goals for its 
Foreign Assistance programs (recognizing that the scope of 
Foreign Assistance goals may be narrower than the scope of 
overall Mission foreign policy goals); 
b) Describe, justify, and prioritize the specific 
proposals for additional resources shown in the Mission 
Request table (i.e., program area and IIP element level 
proposals that exceed the levels shown in the Freeze 
table), linking those proposals to the core strategic 
goals summarized in the previous section; 
c) Describe any cross-cutting strategic integration among 
different Foreign Assistance programs, and how those 
programs may be mutually-reinforcing in the context of the 
Mission's overall strategic goals; 
d) Describe how proposed Foreign Assistance programs and 
other U.S. foreign policy tools (e.g., diplomatic 
interventions or military operations) may be 
mutually-reinforcing; 
e) Cite previous program performance (which may be drawn 
from the Budget and Performance Analysis (BPA) sections des 
cribed below) or other relevant data that demonstrate why 
proposed additional resources can be expected to achieve 
the desired strategic results; 
f) Identify risk factors that may significantly affect 
expected program performance; 
g) Indicate if there are significant impacts on Operating 
Expenses requests; 
h) Where applicable, explain the extent to which earmarked 
or centrally-allocated funds (particularly in the health 
Elements) limit the ability to sufficiently budget for 
other ongoing and important programs in the Freeze request 
and Mission Request. 
 
¶42. Four other general principles apply when writing FA 
Priorities Narratives: 
a) Priorities must be specifically linked to relevant 
program areas or IIP program elements within the five 
 
STATE 00130301  011 OF 022 
 
 
objectives of the Standard Program Structure for Foreign 
Assistance (Peace and Security, Governing Justly and 
Democratically, Investing in People, Economic Growth, and 
Humanitarian Assistance). 
b) Narratives should incorporate relevant information 
about assistance being provided by USG agencies other than 
State and USAID (including the MCC), and information about 
any assistance being provided by other multilateral or bil 
ateral donors that is expected to significantly affect 
program performance. 
c) Operating Units that receive funding from regional or 
other programs should describe in their foreign assistance 
narrative how those funds will be used and what 
performance results will be achieved with them. 
d) MSP narratives should address how Foreign Assistance 
funds are being used to support partner country priorities 
as reflected in Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) 
or other country development plans, foster local ownership 
of the program/process, and build capacity of country 
systems. 
 
¶43. Note: Where Missions have an approved Country 
Assistance Strategy (CAS), the MSP should discuss how the 
CAS supports the MSP.  Missions with USAID programs but 
without an approved CAS should briefly discuss how the 
USAID strategy supports and is consistent with the MSP. 
If the USAID program is not covered by an active and 
approved USAID strategy, it should be stated.  This will 
aid in scheduling succeeding CAS countries and identifying 
USAID programs that may need an interim USAID strategy 
pending a CAS per a recent USAID Notice. 
 
¶44. Budget and Performance Analysis:  As a continuation of 
the FY 2010 Congressional Budget Justification requirement 
from OMB for foreign assistance funds, Operating Units are 
also required to conduct a Budget and Performance Analysis 
for any increase from the Freeze to the Mission Request 
level that exceeds 10% and $1 million at the program area 
or IIP element level.  A BPA is only required for 
increases that meet this threshold.  A BPA consists of i) 
a brief explanation (one paragraph) of the impact the 
proposed increase would be expected to have on the 
Mission's highest level strategic goals; and ii) selection 
of a performance indicator that will best measure program 
performance against those strategic objectives.  Each BPA 
should be linked to the Mission's FA Priorities Narrative 
(described above).  For Operating Units with multiple 
increases exceeding these parameters, the number of BPAs 
required is capped at a maximum of five.  Operating Units 
with more than five increases above 10% and $1 million shou 
ld conduct BPAs on the five largest increases. 
 
¶45. A template for representative indicators and 
narratives can be found on the MSP home page.  This 
template includes detailed guidance with examples on how 
to conduct a BPA. The table requires actual performance 
data from FY 2008 and targets for FY 2009-11. 
 
¶46. Where appropriate, Operating Units are encouraged to 
use an FA performance indicator for both a Goal Paper and 
for a BPA, though it is not required.  However, if an 
Operating Unit chooses to use an FA performance indicator 
for both a Goal Paper and a BPA, the Operating Unit will 
need to fill out the information in both the MSP system 
and the FA template if they are using the same indicator 
in both locations. 
 
¶47. Goal Papers and Foreign Assistance:  Please see the 
 
STATE 00130301  012 OF 022 
 
 
discussion of Goal Papers in Paragraph XX of the guidance. 
 
¶48. Questions about foreign assistance should be directed 
to State or USAID regional bureau planning/program offices 
as appropriate.  Questions related specifically to the 
guidance above should be directed to 
2011FABudget@state.gov.  A list of State, USAID and F 
contacts is available via the FA link on the MSP Help page. 
 
¶49. FUNCTIONAL BUREAU GUIDANCE: 
 
¶50. As agreed with regional bureaus, the democracy 
strategies requirement is being integrated into the MSP to 
minimize the burden on posts and the Department and to 
consolidate our strategic planning.  Each COM in non-democr 
atic or transitioning countries is required to develop 
democracy strategies to promote "democratic principles, 
practices and values and to support, as appropriate, 
nongovernmental organizations, individuals, and movements 
committed to democratic principles, practices and values" 
under P.L. 110-53, the Advancing Democratic Values Act 
(ADVA). (for definitions, see Sec. 2104 of ADVA, Title XXI 
of H.R. 1, posted on the DRL intranet website). Details 
about the how the democracy strategies should be 
incorporated into the MSP can be found in the "MSP 
overview and guidance" section. In general, COM statements 
should reflect this directive, and posts should request 
sufficient Foreign Assistance funds to ensure they have 
the ability to implement robust Governing Justly and 
Democratically (GJ&D) programs and activities.  DRL 
requests that GJ&D goal papers focus 
on the four core elements of the F Foreign Assistance 
Framework for this objective: Rule of Law and Human 
Rights, Good Governance, Political Competition and 
Consensus-Building, and Civil Society (for definitions, 
see http://www.state.gov/f/c24132.htm). 
 Posts in democratic countries should focus their GJ&D 
objectives on ways to encourage host country support for 
human rights, labor and democracy initiatives elsewhere in 
the world. 
 
51.Bureau of Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs (EEB): 
EEB encourages Missions to integrate economic goals into 
the MSP process.  EEB's FY 2010 Bureau Strategic Plan lays 
out EEB's goals and policy tool indicators for advancing 
economic prosperity and security, combating terrorism and 
contributing to homeland security. Posts are also 
encouraged to use the Economic Engagement Matrix 
(http://web.rm.state.gov/eed/eed.htm) to help identify 
country or region-specific policy gaps. 
Posts should highlight important work on setting 
priorities and standards that reflect USG goals at 
international organizations on a range of issues, such as 
market-opening agreements, energy security, information 
and communications technology penetration rates, food 
security, international transportation concerns, 
anti-corruption efforts, intellectual property rights 
issues, and effective poverty-reduction programs. 
Missions may wish to underscore the importance of the 
commercial function by developing performance indicators 
which highlight the impact of trade promotion and advocacy 
services. 
Other indicators to consider include the acreage of 
biotech crops under cultivation and the status of 
emergency oil stockpiles. 
Posts should consider indicators that stimulate the 
economies of developing nations and track efforts to 
increase U.S. trade and investment, and opportunities for 
 
STATE 00130301  013 OF 022 
 
 
U.S. business, including through Public Private 
Partnerships.  In MCC eligible and threshold countries, 
MSPs should incorporate indicators measuring progress in 
the MCC's 17 performance indicators.  Additional 
indicators could include benchmarks measuring 
implementation of structural economic reforms needed to 
obtain the assistance of the IMF or World Bank for 
countries in crisis. 
Questions related to EBB guidance can be directed to 
Lillian Wasvary (WasvaryLG@state.gov).  Additional 
information can be found on our website, 
www.state.gov/e/eeb. 
 
¶52. Office of International Women's Issues (G/IWI): 
MSPs should consider the integration of women's rights 
issues into all aspects of U.S. foreign policy.  In 2008, 
G/IWI worked to raise awareness within the foreign policy 
community of global issues affecting women, including 
political and economic empowerment, forced/child marriage, 
women's property rights, violence against women, and the 
role of women in peace-building and post-conflict 
reconstruction. We encourage missions to develop programs 
and strategies that strengthen women's political, economic 
and social equality.  Our office is available to all posts 
as a resource and advocate on international women's 
issues.  We can be reached at (202) 312-9664; and our 
website is: www.state.gov/g/wi. 
 
¶53. Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons 
(G/TIP): 
As you prepare your FY 2011 MSP please note that 
Trafficking in Persons issues are covered in the 
Department's Strategic Goals under Achieving Peace and 
Security.  Goal papers with performance indicators related 
to Trafficking in Persons issues should be linked to this 
strategic goal.  Inclusion of the anti-trafficking 
indicators reflects the Department's commitment to promote 
and support efforts to eradicate modern-day slavery as 
part of its foreign policy priorities.  Goal papers should 
reflect diplomatic and programmatic efforts to assist 
governments in improving their anti-trafficking efforts, 
particularly in the law enforcement  and judicial efforts 
to arrest, prosecute, convict and  sentence traffickers, 
as well as enhancing the capacity of service providers to 
assist victims, and identifying ways to prevent 
victimization.  Posts should review the country narratives 
in the Department's annual Trafficking in Persons Report 
for specific areas requiring attention.  Posts should also 
support anti-trafficking awareness training for embassy and 
mission personnel that includes guidance on handling 
information 
concerning potential trafficking situations as well as 
information on the USG's zero-tolerance policy for 
contributing 
to or facilitating human trafficking.  Please contact Paula 
Goode at goodepr@state.gov with any questions. 
Information on trafficking in persons is available at 
www.state.gov/g/tip/ . 
 
¶54. Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement 
Affairs (INL): 
This guidance is for officers at posts implementing 
programs with Andean Counterdrug Program (ACP) and 
International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement 
(INCLE) funds.  Within the strategic framework established 
by the Director of Foreign Assistance (F), ACP and INCLE 
funded programs contribute towards the objectives of Peace 
and Security, and Governing Justly and Democratically. 
 
STATE 00130301  014 OF 022 
 
 
Most ACP and INCLE Peace and Security programs fall within 
the following F program areas: Stabilization Operations 
and Security Sector Reform, Counter-Narcotics, and 
Transnational Crime.  Most Governing Justly and 
Democratically programs fall within the Rule of Law and 
Human Rights program area. 
INL requests that posts use the Foreign Assistance 
Priorities section of the MSP to discuss on-going ACP and 
INCLE programs.  If the MSP includes an increased funding 
request for a new or significantly expanded program, 
please include this request in the Foreign Assistance 
Priorities section and in the Foreign Assistance resource 
tables, as appropriate.  Include requested staff increases 
for full time Narcotics Affairs Officers or Law 
Enforcement Affairs Coordinators in the Foreign Assistance 
Priorities section and in the Foreign Assistance resource 
tables; these staff positions are not funded through State 
Operations and must be accounted for through the Foreign 
Assistance resource requests.  If the requested increase 
in funding is substantial, please elevate its discussion 
to a Goal Paper.  Any performance indicators included in 
the MSP should coincide with those used in the Operational 
Plan and in Bilateral Letters of Agreement. 
Please send questions to Keira Goldstein 
(goldsteinka@state.gov) or Larry Bird (birdlf@state.gov). 
 
¶55. Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation 
(ISN): 
The EAP region is an important focus of ISN's policies and 
programs, and we seek embassies' continued assistance and 
cooperation in combating the proliferation of weapons of 
mass destruction (WMD) and the threat of WMD terrorism.  A 
high priority is the disablement of North Korea's nuclear 
program. We coordinate closely with Japan and Australia to 
promote common nonproliferation objectives. We seek 
enhanced cooperation with China, and look for 
opportunities to collaborate with EAP countries in 
multilateral fora.  We rely on embassies' assistance to 
promote our objectives and programs, in particular:  the 
Global Initiative to Combat Nuclear Terrorism; the 
Proliferation Security Initiative; implementation of Iran 
and North Korean UN Security Council Resolutions; 
proliferation finance; implementation of UNSCR 1540; 
strengthening the NPT and IAEA safeguards and other arms 
control/nonproliferation agreements; promotion of peaceful 
nuclear energy consistent with strict nonproliferation 
standards; and controlling conventional weapons transfers, 
including MANPADS.  We ask that you recognize the importance 
of these objectives and report your activities and goals, 
as appropriate, in your MSPs.  Please see 
http://state.gov/t/isn for details of 
the Bureau's activities.  Questions can be directed to 
Jamie Young (youngja2@state.gov).  ISN manages two NADR 
foreign assistance programs of relevance to the region: 
-- Export Control and Related Border Security (EXBS) 
provides targeted assistance to strengthen countries' 
strategic trade and border control infrastructure and 
capabilities aimed at preventing WMD (and MANPADS) 
proliferation and trafficking.  The program is centrally 
planned and implemented by ISN, but we work closely with 
embassies, in particular the regional EXBS officer, to 
tailor programs for their countries and encourage posts to 
address the program in MSPs.  This program falls under 
1.2.1 (Peace and Security, Nonproliferation) in the FA 
matrix.  For details on the EXBS program, see our website 
at www.exportcontrol.org or contact Lisa Jacobson at 
JacobsonLE@state.gov. 
-- Global Threat Reduction (GTR) programs provide 
 
STATE 00130301  015 OF 022 
 
 
assistance to prevent the proliferation of WMD expertise 
and materials, and have the added benefit of contributing 
to general science and technology development, economic 
growth, and counterterrorism.  GTR's programs include the 
Biosecurity Engagement Program, the Chemical Security 
Engagement Program and the Preventing Nuclear Smuggling 
Program.  For more information on these and other GTR 
programs, see our websites at www.bepstate.net; 
www.biistate.net; www.stcu.int; www.istc.ru; 
www.nsoi-state.net; or contact Matthias Mitman, Director 
(MitmanMJ@state.gov)Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and 
Labor (DRL): As agreed with 
 
¶56. Bureau of Oceans, and International Environment and 
Scientific Affairs (OES): 
OES encourages all Environment Science Technology and 
Health (ESTH) officers and Environmental Hub officers in 
the field to participate actively in the MSP development 
process.  While much of ESTH work is centered in Investing 
in People (health, including water) and Economic Growth 
(Environment Program Area, and Infrastructure/Modern 
Energy Services), it can also reinforce our efforts at 
Peace and Security, Governing Justly, and Humanitarian 
Assistance by promoting sustainable economies while 
reinforcing rule of law and transparent democratic 
institutions in key sectors.  Accordingly, Posts are 
encouraged to look to the ESTH officers, Hub officers, and 
OES for assistance in identifying mission priorities and 
programs in the ESTH field that support the Post's stra 
tegic vision and priorities.  Top OES priorities include: 
-     Advancing the U.S. agenda on climate change 
-     Interactions with China across a range of issues, 
from natural resource protection to energy and climate to 
science and technology 
-     Pollution abatement 
-     Promoting the sustainable use of renewable 
natural resources, including forests, wildlife, and marine 
resources 
-     Improving access to safe water and sanitation 
services 
-     International cooperation with respect to the 
Arctic 
-     Preparing for the challenges posed by polio, 
malaria and other infectious diseases 
-     Compliance with the environmental aspects of 
trade agreements 
 
¶57. Public Diplomacy (PD): 
Posts are encouraged to submit a separate PD paper and 
urged to ensure that PD is fully reflected in all goal 
papers. Given the crosscutting nature of public diplomacy, 
it is important to include a discussion of it in the COM 
statement.   For Public Diplomacy MSP Goal Papers, posts 
should use indicators that appear on the list of Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) approved PD performance 
indicators and reflect PD's adherence to federal 
government mandates.  A link to the PD indicators can be 
found on the MSP Policy Guidance page under the heading 
Useful Documents.  Our core list of indicators, 15 for PD 
and 8 for IIP, is meant to ease the burden of writing 
and/or identifying acceptable performance indicators for 
goal papers.  Use of the core PD indicators helps us in 
our engagement with OMB, GAO and Congress. Please contact 
Cherreka Montgomery (montgomeryce@state.gov) with any 
questions concerning public diplomacy indicators and goal 
papers. 
 
¶58. Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (PM): 
 
STATE 00130301  016 OF 022 
 
 
PM issues are included in the Department's Strategic Goal, 
"Achieving Peace and Security."  Our assistance is focused 
on priorities within counterterrorism, weapons of mass 
destruction and destabilizing conventional weapons, 
security cooperation, and security sector reform. 
Funding for military or defense-related programs, 
projects, or training includes Foreign Military Financing 
(FMF), International Military Education and Training 
(IMET), and Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) resources.  PM 
priorities include: using strategic and focused foreign 
assistance to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhancing 
regional stability by strengthening ties with friends and 
allies and resolving regional conflicts, and supporting the 
 war on terrorism.  The focus should be on the development 
of accountable, appropriate, effective, interoperable, and 
professional security forces and institutions, almost 
always under the command and control of the Ministry of 
Defense (with rare exceptions on case-by-case review, led 
by Political-Military Affairs in consultation with the 
Legal Advisor's Office). 
Posts should delineate assistance activities that address 
short-term needs (e.g., deployment to an existing 
peacekeeping operation) as well as longer-term goals 
(e.g., military modernization, security sector reform, or 
building niche capabilities for coalition operations).  In 
listing the external factors that could influence the 
goal's accomplishment in the "Goal Description" section, 
please also indicate a relationship to external funding 
sources (to include those provided by the Department of 
Defense) to meet the same goals. 
Missions planning to request NADR Conventional Weapons 
Destruction program resources are asked to justify 
according to the following priorities: prevent/reduce 
terrorist access to conventional weapons (with priority 
given to MANPADS) and munitions and foster regional 
stability through improved security.  For humanitarian 
demining (HD) programs, or International Trust Fund (ITF) 
support, guiding priorities are: contribute to 
humanitarian efforts by protecting the victims of 
conflict, restore land and infrastructure contaminated by 
explosive remnants of war to productive use, and prevent 
civilian injuries from the detonation of unstable and/or 
loosely secured munitions near population centers.  Under 
external factors, missions are requested to include 
external funding sources (DOD, UN, regional organizations, 
etc.) to meet the same goals, and explain how U.S. 
assistance would augment or complement any ongoing work. 
Civilian-Military Cooperation 
In accordance with the USAID Policy on Civilian-Military 
Cooperation, in locations where appropriate, the Chief of 
Mission should ensure effective coordination among all US 
civilian and military entities in the country in support 
of US objectives.  The MSP should address the following: 
¶1.    Civil-Military Cooperation.  Briefly describe 
the state of civil-military cooperation at post, including 
future plans or opportunities, and highlight any 
activities for FY 2011 (e.g.; ship visits or civil affairs 
activities) which demonstrate civil-military cooperation. 
¶2.    Ongoing Programs.  Where programs are currently 
being implemented jointly by civilian agencies and the US 
military, describe how they contribute to the overall 
achievement of Mission goals. 
¶3.    Coordination mechanisms.  Operating units should 
discuss formal coordination mechanisms at post between 
military representatives and civilian agencies, 
particularly those that employ joint planning approaches. 
For ongoing 1206, Foreign Military Sales (FMS) or 
International Military Education and Training (IMET) or 
 
STATE 00130301  017 OF 022 
 
 
related programs implemented by the military at post, 
discuss how they complement or enhance civilian efforts. 
¶4.    Opportunities:  If the post has identified 
opportunities for enhanced civilian-military cooperation 
that require further Washington involvement, or for which 
Washington civilian agency support is requested. 
 
¶59. Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM): 
Humanitarian assistance is a relevant objective for posts 
in countries: (1) hosting refugees, internally displaced 
persons (IDPs), stateless populations, vulnerable 
migrants, and/or victims of trafficking; (2) receiving 
refugee returnees; (3) experiencing or at risk of 
humanitarian crisis; (4) developing migration management 
systems; or (5) providing significant donor support to 
international humanitarian organizations.  The Bureau of 
Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) serves as a 
resource to Posts on any of these issues; please see 
detailed MSP guidance at http://prm.state.gov.  Please 
contact Deborah Hooker at HookerDJ@state.gov or (202) 
663-1042. 
PRM funding includes the Migration and Refugee Assistance 
(MRA) and Emergency Refugee and Migration Assistance 
(ERMA) accounts, located under the Global/Functional 
category of the Foreign Assistance Framework, including 
the following program areas: Protection, Assistance and 
Solutions and Migration Management.  These funds are 
programmed by PRM and covered in PRM's Bureau Strategic 
Plan.  Although neither MRA nor ERMA is available for 
programming directly by posts, and although MSPs should 
not include requests for these funds, the humanitarian 
issues/objectives should be referenced in MSPs.  If there 
are key humanitarian assistance needs relating to 
refugees, IDPs, or other conflict victims that could 
benefit from other funding sources available to post, 
posts should include these in their budget requests. 
Information provided by posts informs funding decisions 
made in Washington.  Region-specific guidance below 
supplements PRM's detailed MSP guidance (see 
http://prm.state.gov), which defines humanitarian 
programs and relevant indicators. 
Humanitarian assistance in East Asia emphasizes support 
throughout the region for Burmese refugees, IDPs, conflict 
victims and stateless persons, North Korean refugees and 
vulnerable migrants, Hmong asylum seekers, and protection 
of other refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, TIP 
victims and other vulnerable migrants in Mongolia, 
Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia and Indonesia. 
Resettlement of Burmese refugees in Thailand and Malaysia 
to the United States remains a priority. 
 
¶60. Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and 
Stabilization (S/CRS): 
In preparation for this year's Mission Strategic Plan 
(MSP), posts facing current or potential conflict, 
particularly those on the Intelligence Community's 
Internal Instability Watchlist (available at 
www.state.sgov/s/crs/), or identified by F as a Rebuilding 
country, are requested by S/CRS to include an analytical 
paragraph in the Chief of Mission Statement on conflict in 
the country or region.  The paragraph should identify key 
causes of current or potential conflict and highlight any 
recent or anticipated changes in the situation.  Posts 
should identify what opportunities exist to address 
conflict, and describe how the country team is planning to 
respond including allocating resources.  Missions should 
discuss their ability to monitor and influence sources of 
conflict and indicate what, if any, additional resources 
 
STATE 00130301  018 OF 022 
 
 
would be required to do so, including assistance from the 
Office of the Coordinator for Reconstruction and 
Stabilization (S/CRS).  Posts should also consider 
conflict issues in developing goal papers and relevant 
indicators for the MSP. S/CRS can assist Missions in 
conducting this analysis and targeted planning, 
including addressing contingencies, using tools such 
as best practices guides, the Interagency 
Conflict Assessment Framework, and the USG Planning 
Framework for Reconstruction, Stabilization, and Conflict 
Transformation and possible access to Reconstruction and 
Stabilization funds through the use of 1207 authority. 
For more information or to request any of these services 
from S/CRS, please contact s/crs rmo@state.gov. 
Information is also available from 
http://www.crs.state.gov.60. Office of the Coordinator for 
Counterterrorism (S/CT): 
 
¶61. Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism (S/CT): 
Posts that choose to write a CT goal paper should 
structure it by the following expected outcomes: the 
extent to which the government of the foreign country is 
cooperating with the United States Government in 
apprehending, convicting, and punishing terrorists; the 
actions by the country eliminating terrorist safe havens; 
country's political will in WoT, including passing and 
implementing legislation; country's receptivity to ATA and 
other training; and assessment of results; building 
coalitions in regional and multilateral organizations, 
including terror finance regimes; efforts in border 
security; efforts to fight radicalization and/or 
rehabilitate and reintegrate lower-rung terrorists back 
into society.  Posts in major donor countries may wish to 
identify those nations, support for key U.S. objectives in 
the developing world, such as capacity-building and 
improving governance in failed or fragile states. 
Questions should be directed to Dan Rosen 
(RosenDA@state.gov) 
 
¶62. Office of the Global Aids Coordinator (S/GAC): 
S/GAC urges countries with significant or growing 
epidemics to make HIV/AIDS programming and public 
diplomacy a priority in their FY 2011 MSP.  Any HIV/AIDS 
indicators included should be consistent with President's 
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-approved 
indicators.  S/GAC urges countries with a significant 
proportion of their FY 2009 USG budget in HIV/AIDS funding 
to develop a goal paper specific to HIV/AIDS; other 
countries are encouraged to include HIV/AIDS in a health 
/Investing in People goal paper.  The goal paper should 
describe critical interventions in prevention, treatment, 
and care and emphasize the importance of continued 
coordination with PEPFAR implementing USG agencies, and 
improved leveraging of other donor resources, especially 
the Global Fund.  For Missions that are developing PEPFAR 
Partnership Compacts with the host governments, please 
provide a brief description of the five-year strategy for 
the partnership. 
While requests for PEPFAR-funded staff are made through 
the Country Operational Plans (COP) and mini-COPs, 
Missions are asked to consider recent or anticipated 
requests for increases in PEPFAR staff when evaluating 
requests for Embassy and Mission management and operations 
support for the program in country. 
If Posts have further questions on this guidance, please 
contact Sara Allinder (AllinderSM@state.gov) or Karin Fenn 
(FennKM@state.gov). 
Global HIV/AIDS Initiative (GHAI) Account 
 
STATE 00130301  019 OF 022 
 
 
The control numbers provided for the GHAI account are 
subject to change and should not be considered final.  The 
control numbers have been straight-lined from FY 2009 
planning levels.  FY 2009 planning levels are inserted as 
the control because FY 2010 Congressional Budget 
Justification (CBJ) levels are not yet available for the GH 
AI account in F OP countries.  Planned Global HIV/AIDS 
funding levels are allocated through the PEPFAR 
interagency headquarters team.  Therefore, Missions are 
asked not to request changes to the control numbers 
provided for HIV/AIDS at this time.  GHAI levels are 
normally provided to countries in June prior to the fiscal 
year of appropriation.  Missions may also know this 
account by its current name:  Global Health and Child 
Survival-State (GHCS-State). 
 
¶63. Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation 
(VCI): 
In support of the Department's efforts to achieve global 
peace and security, it is essential that verification 
requirements and capabilities are fully considered and 
appropriately integrated throughout the development, 
negotiation, and implementation of arms control, 
nonproliferation, and disarmament agreements and 
commitments. Compliance with these commitments must then 
be assessed and enforced on an ongoing basis.  By securing 
the global community's acceptance of and active 
participation in verification and compliance regimes, we 
bolster the U.S. foreign policy agenda and enhance the 
credibility of treaties and agreements as effective 
instruments of international security.  Urging governments 
and international organizations to acquire relevant 
information and data necessary for compliance assessments 
and to encourage enforcement of States Parties' compliance 
with their arms control, nonproliferation, and disarmament 
agreements and commitments is part of an ongoing process 
requiring active Department leaders 
hip within the U.S. national security structure here and 
by our diplomatic missions abroad. 
Please include, as appropriate, the following objectives 
and activities as you develop your Mission Strategic Plan. 
-- Engage in active diplomacy, bilaterally, at 
international organizations, and at multilateral 
conferences to strengthen international understanding of 
the need for full compliance with arms control, 
nonproliferation, and disarmament obligations and commi 
tments, as well as the need for a robust international 
response to noncompliance. 
-- Reference the findings of the President's "Report on 
Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, 
Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and 
Commitments" (http://www.state.gov/t/vci/rls/rpt/c9721) 
when planning for actions related to specific compliance 
issues involving host governments and seek cooperation 
with host governments to address countries of concern. 
(For details, contact Tim MacGregor, VCI Senior Advisor 
for Compliance, at MacGregorTS@state.gov.) 
-- Actively support the verifiable elimination of North 
Korea's nuclear program, including all aspects of their 
nuclear weapons program as essential to the credibility of 
the nuclear nonproliferation regime and as a deterrent to 
other States who may seek to circumvent their obligations 
under other nonproliferation regimes.  The 
denuclearization of North Korea also will pave the way for 
North Korea to fulfill their pledge to return to the NPT 
and IAEA Safeguards. (For details, contact Jeff Eberhardt, 
VCI/NA Director, at EberhardtJL@state.gov.) 
-- Bolster Alliance solidarity as critical to addressing a 
 
STATE 00130301  020 OF 022 
 
 
more confrontational Russia and returning Russia to 
compliance with the CFE, bringing the Adapted CFE Treaty 
into force, and shaping future conventional arms control 
policy within an evolving Euro-Atlantic security 
framework. (For details, contact Donna Phelan, VCI/CCA 
Deputy Director, at Phelando@state.gov.) 
-- Support implementation of the Strategic Arms Reduction 
Treaty (START) under its terms; strengthening the 
strategic security relationship with Russia through 
implementation of the Moscow Treaty; and developing 
transparency and confidence building measures for a 
post-START arrangement.  (For details, contact Jerry 
Taylor, VCI/SI Director, at TaylorJ@state.gov.) 
-- Seek support for Iran's compliance with UNSC 
Resolutions and IAEA Board of Governors' Resolutions 
requiring Iran to suspend its nuclear enrichment effort, 
cooperate fully with the IAEA to ascertain the true nature 
of Iran's past nuclear activities, restore international 
confidence in the peaceful nature of Iran's current 
nuclear program, and bring Iran back into full compliance 
with the NPT and its IAEA Safeguards agreement.  (For 
details, contact Whitney Raas, at RaasWL@state.gov) 
-- Bolster support for enforcing compliance with 
nonproliferation treaties and commitments through physical 
interdiction and political and economic sanctions, where 
appropriate, (includes sanctions determinations pursuant 
to the semi-annual Iran, North Korea, Syria 
Nonproliferation Act); and urge host governments to 
enhance domestic laws and regulations to stem 
proliferation.  (For details, contact Stephen Tomchik, 
Senior Advisor for Sanctions, at TomchikSJ@state.gov.) 
-- Support improved responses to potential biological 
weapons incidents in order to deter attacks and enhance 
U.S. ability to make compliance and attribution 
determinations.  Promote compliance with the Biological 
Weapons Convention (BWC) and with efforts to ensure 
regional and universal compliance with the Convention. 
(For details, contact Brian Nordmann, VCI/BW Director, at 
NordmaBR@state.gov.) 
 -- Promote compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention 
(CWC) and work with the Organization for the Prohibition 
of Chemical Weapons to ensure that the verification regime 
remains viable and continues to keep pace with changes in 
the chemical industry and technological advances; support 
assessment of the robustness of the CWC inspection regime 
to ensure effective verification of declared military and 
industrial facilities. (For details, contact Johnathan 
Beckett, VCI/CCA Deputy Director for CW, at 
BecketJo@state.gov.) 
-- Support enhanced U.S. efforts to reduce the risk of 
conflict between countries that could result from 
accident, miscalculation, or misunderstanding, while 
supporting confidence building and transparency efforts 
through the Nuclear Risk Reduction Center (NRRC).  The 
NRRC is manned 24/7 and maintains direct government to 
government communications links with Russia, Ukraine, 
Belarus, and Kazakhstan and communication links with the 
Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe and 
the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. 
(For details, contact Ned Williams, VCI/NRRC Staff 
Director, at WilliamsNB@state.gov.) 
(VCI/FO Coordinator, Janey Wright, at WrightJF@state.gov.) 
 
¶64. MANAGEMENT BUREAU GUIDANCE 
 
¶65. Foreign Service Institute: 
Posts are asked, as part of their strategic planning 
discussions, to consider training as a key element in the 
 
STATE 00130301  021 OF 022 
 
 
development and management of their human resources; and 
when proposing new or expanded activities that may involve 
a training component to factor in or note, when 
applicable, the impact to centralized training and post 
assignment travel resources that are overseen by FSI and 
HR respectively. 
 
¶66. Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA): 
CA encourages all consular sections to ensure that 
consular priorities are properly addressed in the FY 2011 
MSPs.  Consular sections should critically examine their 
projected consular workload for FY 2011 and beyond and 
ensure any necessary facilities and personnel requests are 
included in the State Operations and U.S. Direct Hire 
Requests sections.  Under the current strategic framework, 
consular services are addressed in the strategic goal on 
"Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities," 
though our work also relates to the "Achieving Peace and 
Security" and "Promoting International Understanding" 
strategic goals. 
Depending on foreign policy priorities in your country, 
posts may choose to include consular-specific goal papers 
or incorporate consular services into the COM statement or 
broader mission goal papers.  For example, posts working 
to improve rule of law may want to include accession to 
multilateral treaties affecting private Americans (e.g. 
Hague adoption or abduction conventions, prisoner transfer 
treaties, etc.).  Law enforcement capacity-building and 
security information-sharing may be top mission 
priorities, providing opportunities to highlight the 
contribution of consular fraud prevention objectives. 
Post public diplomacy efforts should address the consular 
role, both in public outreach and in the tangible 
experience of each individual applicant who visits the 
consular section.  These priorities can have direct 
resource implications on your section, so we encourage you 
to take a good look at FY 2011 during the MSP process and 
plan for the opportunities and requirements it has in 
store. 
If you have questions regarding consular priorities in the 
MSP process, please contact the CA/P Special Assistant at 
CA-PSpecialAssistant@state.gov or 202-647-5483. 
 
¶67. Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS): 
DS is initiating coordination with all posts through a 
separate communication to RSOs to identify post's 
security-related requests and to integrate those requests 
into the DS strategic planning process and Congressional 
Budget Justification input.  Post management should also 
consider security costs associated with new activities, 
policies, or programs and discuss them with their RSO for 
onward submission to DS in Washington. 
For the purpose of the MSP, posts should highlight those 
security issues which significantly impact their ability 
to achieve strategic goals.    These security requirements 
should be reflected, as appropriate, in the COM statement 
and the resource and position request tables. 
 
¶68. Office of Policy, Rightsizing and Innovation (M/PRI): 
The MSP is an excellent vehicle for COMs and their country 
teams to examine their operations in the context of 
rightsizing and quality management goals.  Rightsizing: 
Duplicative functions at post should be consolidated. 
Functions that can be performed by personnel based in the 
United States or at regional offices overseas should not 
be performed at post.  Posts should look for possibilities 
to empower locally employed staff so they may perform 
functions in place of U.S. direct hire personnel. In your 
 
STATE 00130301  022 OF 022 
 
 
reviews, should you find staffing to be either excessive 
or inadequate to the performance of priority Mission goals 
and objectives, please initiate staffing change requests 
in accordance with established procedures.  It is vitally 
important that all elements and agencies in the mission 
participate in the preparation of the MSP.  A review of 
new non-State overseas positions requested through the 
NSDD-38 process has found that only a small percentage of 
them had been included in those missions' MSP submissions, 
suggesting that there needs to be better integration of 
all agencies' plans in the MSP process. 
RICE