VZCZCXRO1245
RR RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHIHL RUEHKUK RUEHTRO
DE RUEHC #8957/01 3432027
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 082012Z DEC 08
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO ALL NEAR EAST COLLECTIVE

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 13 STATE 128957 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ABUD AFIN AMGT KICA KSEP KSPR OTRA PREL XF
SUBJECT: NEA MSP GUIDANCE 2011 
 
Sensitive but Unclassified.  Please handle accordingly. 
Summary: 
¶1.  The following cable provides consolidated guidance from 
Washington to missions for the preparation of FY 2011 Mission 
Strategic Plans (MSP). This cable is divided into the 
following sections: Regional Bureau Guidance; Bureau of 
Resource Management (RM), Office of Strategic and Performance 
Planning Overview and Guidance; Functional Bureau Guidance; 
and Management Bureau Guidance.  End Summary 
REGIONAL BUREAU GUIDANCE 
Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs Policy Overview and Guidance 
¶2.  Posts should take into account overall USG goals and 
objectives, particularly with regard to (1) 
Israeli-Palestinian peace, (2) Iran, (3) Iraq, and (4) 
countering violent extremism. 
We ask that posts addressing issues of regional, 
sub-regional, or cross-border significance coordinate 
strategies, tactics, and indicators with other concerned 
posts to ensure that MSP submissions are consistent across 
the Bureau. 
The NEA team includes: NEA Coordinators:  NEA/RA Hanne 
Ulrichsen / Lisa Langevin,   NEA/EX/HR Lucia Verrier, and 
NEA/EX/Budget Anne Wennerstrom. 
MSP OVERVIEW AND GUIDANCE 
¶3.  It is important that all elements and agencies in the 
mission participate in the preparation of the MSP.  The MSP 
is the first step in the annual planning and performance 
evaluation process that contributes to the Department,s 
results oriented performance efforts. It will inform the FY 
2011 State Operations and Foreign Operations budget requests, 
including mission-specific increases/decreases in U.S. Direct 
Hire positions. 
¶4.  The web-based MSP application allows direct input and 
submission of all narrative and resource information. 
Mission personnel will obtain access to the MSP application 
from their mission's designated MSP Coordinator.  The MSP 
Coordinator will ensure that all sections of the plan are 
properly completed before the MSP is formally submitted to 
Washington.  Software user instructions will be available on 
the MSP website which is found at 
http://spp.rm.state.gov/spp800X600template.cf m?id=8.   The 
MSPs will be due to Washington in early February 2009.  Fixed 
text limits have been established for each of the narrative 
and resource request justification sections.  A 24/7 help 
desk service will be provided during the peak MSP drafting 
and submission period. 
¶5.  There are several modifications to the MSP for FY 2011: 
     Strategic Goal Allocation ) The allocation of U.S. 
Direct-Hire Time by strategic goal has been eliminated. 
     U.S. Direct-Hire Human Resource Requests ) Missions 
will enter position support costs for individual requests in 
the Human Resources request screen. 
     Performance Results ) Missions will enter performance 
results relative to the FY 2008 performance targets. 
     Previous Year Chief of Mission Statement and Foreign 
Assistance Priorities Narrative Pre-populated ) Missions 
have the ability to pre-populate the FY 2011 MSP application 
with the previous year's Chief of Mission Statement and 
Foreign Assistance Priorities Narrative. 
     Foreign Assistance Requests ) Funding requests will be 
collected only at the area level except for the Investing in 
People objective.  For this objective only, Missions will 
enter Foreign Assistance request levels at the element level. 
     Summary of Foreign Assistance Request ) A revised 
Foreign Assistance Summary table will replace the one-page 
summary of the Foreign Assistance Resource Request. 
     Upon completion of the MSP (including review) process, 
Posts are requested to provide by front channel cable slugged 
for NEA/RA and NEA/EX the total number of employee hours 
spent to comply with this year,s requirements and, where 
available, a comparison with the amount of time involved in 
the previous year,s MSP. 
     Global Partnership Clearinghouse: The Global 
Partnership Center (GPC) leads efforts to promote the use of 
public-private partnerships (PPPs) to advance U.S. 
international affairs objectives. The GPC is a resource  for 
Mission and Bureau  to engage the private sector, 
foundations, civil society and others through partnerships. 
The Global Partnership Clearinghouse is the database of PPPs 
engaged under Chief of Mission authority.  The Clearinghouse 
was launched for the first time in the FY 2010 MSP and BSP 
cycles and captured information on more than 640 PPPs.  Again 
this year, the GPC will gather information on existing and 
planned multi-sector partnerships in which post is engaged 
under Chief of Mission authority. The Clearinghouse gathers 
PPP information through an online application accessed via 
the same webpage as the MSP application. Additional 
information regarding the Global Partnership Center will be 
posted at http://gpc.state.gov/. Please direct any questions 
 
STATE 00128957  002 OF 013 
 
 
regarding the Clearinghouse to GPC@State.gov.  Clearinghouse 
data is available to assist Missions and may also be 
requested by email to GPC@State.gov. 
     Democracy Strategy Requirement: In accordance with 
Title XXI of P.L. 110-53, the Advancing Democratic Values Act 
(ADVA) of 2007 and with National Security Policy Directive-58 
signed by the President in July 2008, all posts in 
non-democratic and democratic transition countries are 
required to incorporate their democracy strategy into their 
MSP. The required democracy strategies are to be 
forward-looking three to five years and should be 
incorporated into four parts of the MSP: the COM statement, 
the GJD Goal Paper, the Foreign Assistance priorities 
narrative section, and the Foreign Assistance and State Ops 
budget request section. 
 
¶6.  This replaces last year,s requirement for a stand alone 
ADVA democracy strategy paper. It is designed to minimize the 
burden on posts and the Department while integrating the 
democracy strategy into the Mission Strategic Plan itself. 
(Note: The Advancing Freedom and Democracy Report ) AFDR ) 
will remain as an annual reporting requirement.) Additional 
information regarding the Democracy Strategy requirement will 
be posted at http://drl.state.gov/Please direct any questions 
regarding the requirement to pf-DRL-Reports@State.gov (listed 
in the GAL as DRL-Reports). 
MSP SECTIONS AND RESOURCE REQUEST GUIDANCE 
¶7.  The MSP contains the following sections: Chief of Mission 
Statement; Foreign Assistance Priorities; Goal Papers; U.S. 
Direct Hire Requests; State Operations Resource Requests; and 
Foreign Assistance Resource Requests. 
¶8.  Chief of Mission (COM) Statement: The COM Statement 
should focus on the mission's most important foreign policy 
priorities for the planning period, FY 2009-2011, and should 
serve as the MSP's Executive Summary.  The COM Statement 
should reference the highest priority resource requests for 
FY 2011 (Foreign Assistance, State Operations, and U.S. 
Direct Hires) and justify why and how these requests are 
critical to achieving mission and bureau goals.  Past 
accomplishments should be included only if they set the 
strategic context for future mission goals and resource 
needs.  The COM Statement can include information such as 
historical factors if relevant to current foreign policy 
goals, and should provide a summary of USG presence and any 
projected staffing changes for all agencies under Chief of 
Mission authority.  The COM Statement is limited to four 
pages. 
For ADVA Non-Democratic and Democratic Transition Countries: 
¶9.  To comply with the Advancing Democratic Values Act (ADVA) 
and NSPD-58 (see paragraph 5), Department requests that the 
COM Statement for all non-democratic and democratic 
transition country posts incorporate a description of post,s 
strategy that is broadly consistent with the strategic 
approaches appropriate for &threatened and fragile 
democracies8, &authoritarian regimes8 or &closed 
totalitarian8 regimes as outlined in the NSPD-58 (which 
desks will have available to send to posts by e-mail) . 
¶10.  The COM statement should:  (1) describe the democracy 
results COM thinks are desirable and realistically possible 
if the strategy COM  proposes is implemented as planned in 
the three to five year time frame; (2) identify the major 
democracy issues or problems that need to be addressed in the 
country; (3) describe the opportunities for progress and the 
consequences of failing to address these issues; and (4) 
describe the diplomatic and assistance tools needed to 
overcome the major democracy issues and how these mutually 
reinforce each other. 
¶11.  Foreign Assistance Priorities: This narrative section 
should be completed by missions requesting FY 2011 Foreign 
Assistance funding.  It should complement the COM Statement 
by providing more specific details on the mission's Foreign 
Assistance priorities within the context of the overall 
mission goals outlined in the COM Statement, and justifying 
why and how the requests in the Foreign Assistance Resource 
Request Table are critical to achieving the mission's goals. 
Department requests that the foreign assistance narrative be 
consistent with the COM statement, the ADVA strategy, and the 
GJD Goal paper.  It should reflect how diverse components of 
assistance complement each other in support of a coherent 
strategy.  Providing specific examples of how program 
performance has influenced the request is encouraged. 
Discussion of priorities should be organized by the Foreign 
Assistance Framework's five strategic objectives (Peace and 
Security, Governing Justly and Democratically, Investing in 
People, Economic Growth, and Humanitarian Assistance). There 
is no specific format required beyond the general 
organization noted above, though it is limited to three pages. 
¶12.  Goal Papers: Missions may write up to a total of seven 
goal papers and will be able to utilize goal papers carried 
over from the FY 2010 MSP or create entirely new ones.  The 
key components of the Goal Papers are as follows: 
¶13.  Posts in non-democratic and democratic transition 
countries are requested to submit a GJD goal paper. The GJD 
 
STATE 00128957  003 OF 013 
 
 
Goal paper should be a succinct summary statement of the GJD 
goals and the broad strategy to reach those goals. 
-- Goal Title: Missions should craft their own customized, 
mission-oriented goal statements.  The Goal Title can be 
broad or specific, but should focus on the mission's most 
important USG foreign policy priorities.  The Goal Title is 
limited to one line of text and will populate the Table of 
Contents. 
-- Goal Description: After defining a goal, missions should 
enter a more detailed goal description, outlining why 
achieving the goal is important and how the mission will 
accomplish this goal (i.e., what strategies will various 
mission elements pursue to achieve the desired results). 
Missions may wish to discuss other related activities such 
as: how they work with foreign partners, regional or 
international organizations, and NGOs; the long-term nature 
of the goal; external factors that could influence achieving 
the goal; etc. 
-- Department Goal Linkage: Missions will link each 
customized goal to up to three State/USAID Strategic Goals 
through a drop-down menu.  Missions may link their goal to 
any of the State/USAID Strategic Goals as outlined in the FY 
2007-2012 Department of State and USAID Strategic Plan. 
-- USG Agencies: From a drop-down field, missions will select 
key USG agencies that have a role in helping to accomplish 
the customized mission goal. 
-- Performance Indicator(s): For each customized goal, 
missions are required to include only one performance 
indicator, with an option for a second.  Indicators should 
focus on the accomplishment of the mission's high-level 
foreign policy goals, and not solely on assistance.  Missions 
are encouraged (although not required) to include 
quantifiable and outcome-oriented indicators whenever 
possible.  Missions may include a mix of indicators that are 
within the mission's control and those more contextual in 
nature, such as the Freedom House Index.  However, indicators 
are most useful when they can be linked to either existing or 
proposed resource requests.  Missions are encouraged to 
continue to use priority indicators from last year's MSP. 
Performance indicator captions are limited to three lines of 
text and should be phrased as neutral measures, not as 
outcomes, e.g. number of international treaties and domestic 
initiatives implemented in support of USG global climate 
change policy objectives.  Additional Foreign Operations 
performance data will also be collected separately. Details 
to follow. 
-- Performance Targets and Results:  Missions will set 
performance targets for FY 2009, FY 2010, and FY 2011 for 
each performance indicator.  If a mission utilizes previous 
MSP indicators, they should include the previous FY 2008 
target and a FY 2008 result.  Performance targets and results 
are limited to eight lines of text each.  In an effort to 
clarify mission performance RM/SPP has created a dropdown 
menu in the MSP application where missions will enter a 
performance rating relative to the FY 2008 performance 
indicator target.  The FY 2008 result is considered &on 
target8 only when the target was reached exactly as stated 
or &above target8 if exceeded. Results which are lower than 
the target, but improved over prior year,s performance 
should be labeled as &improved over prior, but not met.8 
Results that do not meet target and do not improve over prior 
year, should be labeled as &below target.8 Finally, data 
that is not available at the time of publication of the 
report, e.g., collected later in the year or every other year 
or a new measure is created, should be labeled &data not yet 
available.8 
¶14.  RESOURCE TABLES.  Included within the resource tables 
are the following: U.S. Direct Hire Requests, State 
Operations Resource Requests, and Foreign Assistance Resource 
Requests.  Funding increase requests should be focused on 
highest priority, critical areas and be supported by 
sufficient justification that can be reviewed for potential 
support by senior Department management. 
¶15.  U.S. Direct Hire Requests: Missions will include 
position information and succinct justifications for each FY 
2011 State-funded position request.  Justifications will be 
limited to ten lines.  U.S. personnel requested from other 
U.S. agencies are also included in this table; however one 
justification is entered at the agency-level rather than for 
each requested position.  The most important staffing needs 
should also be highlighted in the COM statement and linked to 
critical mission priorities or operational requirements. 
¶16.  Missions will enter position support costs for 
individual requests in the Human Resources request screen. 
Please use the following guidelines to determine the position 
support costs for new USDH human resource requests: 
Position Support Costs (not including OBO and DS Position 
Support Costs) 
     Recurring Cost * non-salary and benefits position 
support costs (not including OBO and DS Position Support 
Costs) that are incurred repeatedly; for example, educational 
allowances and field travel. 
     Non-Recurring Cost * non-salary and benefits position 
 
STATE 00128957  004 OF 013 
 
 
support costs (not including OBO and DS Position Support 
Costs) that are unlikely to occur again in the normal course 
of business; for example, new office furniture, fixtures and 
equipment and make ready/move-in expenses. 
OBO Position Support Costs 
     Recurring OBO Costs *non-salary position support costs 
that are incurred repeatedly; for example, residential leases. 
     Non-Recurring OBO Costs * non-salary position support 
costs that are unlikely to occur again in the normal course 
of business; for example, generators for a new residence. 
DS Position Support Costs 
     Recurring DS Costs* non-salary position support costs 
that are incurred repeatedly; for example, allowances, 
residential guards, mobile patrols, ICASS costs, utilities, 
etc. 
     Non-Recurring DS Costs * non-salary position support 
costs that are unlikely to occur again in the normal course 
of business; for example residential security upgrades for a 
new residence, furniture, furnishings, and equipment 
purchases.  (Note that funding for a replacement life cycle 
would need to be established for certain large equipment 
purchases such as generators, and vehicles.) 
¶17.  Missions will also be asked to determine a &responsible 
bureau8 for each new USDH position request.  The 
&responsible bureau8 is the bureau responsible for deciding 
if that position should be created and requested in the CBJ. 
Funding is considered separately in different fields.  Of 
course, per NSDD38, final decision for actual overseas 
establishment of the position rests with the Chief of 
Mission. 
¶18.  This section will display previous year MSP State 
position requests and the regional bureau,s decisions during 
the Bureau Strategic Planning process to approve or deny the 
request. If previous requests were not included in the FY 
2009 or FY 2010 budget submissions, posts may resubmit them 
as FY 2011 requests. As in previous years, FY 2011 position 
requests will be reviewed by regional bureau EX offices prior 
to transmittal to HR and RM/BP.  A summary FY 2011 U.S. 
Direct Hire Requests table will be included in the submitted 
MSP. 
¶19.  Human Resources Summary: The human resources summary 
table is organized by section (e.g. POL, ECON, MGMT).  Other 
USG positions are not required though they will appear in the 
summary printed table.  The total number of FY 2009 FTEs by 
section will be pre-populated into the MSP from HR's PASS 
Post Personnel (PS) system.  An RM/SPP ALDAC instructed 
missions to update their PS data in advance of the date it 
was imported to the MSPs to maximize the accuracy of the HR 
data. Use of Post Personnel source data will ensure 
consistent position counts, eliminate the need for posts to 
maintain separate data.  Any inconsistencies in HR numbers 
should be corrected directly in the PS system.  Direct 
inquiries to PassHelpDeskMail@state.gov or 202 647-7760. 
¶20.  State Operations Resource Requests: This section 
includes separate account tables for FY 2011 Program, ICASS, 
and PD, and Fee-Funded (position support costs only) 
increases/decreases.  Missions will request FY 2011 account 
increases/decreases by funding category.  Missions will 
include one total funding request and combined justification 
for each category by account. 
¶21.  At the end of each account table, missions can discuss 
FY 2011 resource priorities in a short narrative section. 
The priority statement will inform regional bureau 
decision-making process. A summary FY 2011 State Operations 
Resource Requests table will be included in the printed MSP. 
¶22.  Use the following guidelines to determine how to enter 
these changes to state operations funding. (Missions will 
enter position support costs for individual requests in the 
Human Resources request screen.): 
     LES (Salary and Benefits) )Recurring Cost* specific 
salary, benefits and new support costs of new locally engaged 
staff request(s) and FY 2011 LES wage increase(s).  Narrative 
justification should provide a specific basis for the 
request; indicate the need that will be addressed with the 
funding; and specify position(s) by grade and a breakdown of 
the total cost for each position. 
     Furniture and Equipment ) Non-Recurring Cost*funding 
for the purchase of new furniture and office equipment for 
existing employees.  Furniture and equipment costs for new 
positions are defined in the Position Support Costs funding 
categories.  Narrative justification should provide a basis 
for the request; indicate the need that will be addressed 
with the funding; and a breakdown of the total cost for each 
major item(s). 
     Other-Recurring Cost * all recurring State Operations 
increases that are not covered in other State Operations 
funding categories. Narrative justification should provide a 
basis for the request; indicate the need that will be 
addressed with the funding; and a breakdown of the total cost 
for each major item(s). 
     Other-Non-recurring Cost * all non-recurring State 
Operations increases that are not covered in other State 
Operations funding categories. Narrative justification should 
 
STATE 00128957  005 OF 013 
 
 
provide a basis for the request; indicate the need that will 
be addressed with the funding; and a breakdown of the total 
cost for each item(s). 
     Vehicles ) Non Recurring Cost (ICASS only)*funding 
for the purchase of any new vehicles for existing employees. 
Narrative justification should indicate the need that will be 
addressed with the new vehicle(s). 
¶23.  Within the MSP software application, missions can view 
the FY 2010 MSP requests and bureau decisions.  Missions 
should consult with their bureaus on whether these positions 
have been incorporated into subsequent FY 2009-2010 budget 
requests, and may choose to re-request a category item 
requested but not granted previously should re-enter this 
information as a new FY 2011 request. 
¶24.  Classification and Distribution: MSPs are considered 
internal deliberative documents, classified as Sensitive But 
Unclassified, and will not be distributed  beyond agencies 
represented at the mission.  Missions are  encouraged to 
share their MSPs, particularly the Chief of Mission 
statement,  with appropriate contacts, including POLADS, 
within geographic combatant commands.  As part of the ongoing 
discussions in a sub-PCC working group on planning there is 
consensus on the importance of civilian and military planners 
informing each other of country and regional level 
priorities. 
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF U.S. FOREIGN ASSISTANCE GUIDANCE: 
¶25.  This section provides information needed for field-based 
operating units with foreign assistance (FA) funding to 
prepare their FY 2011 foreign assistance resource requests. 
It contains important changes to the FA resource request 
process, particularly regarding budget preparation and 
submissions for regional platforms.  The key changes to the 
guidance include: 
 
(a) The &Freeze8 level will be the straightline of the FY 
2010 S-Approved level (formerly the &Constrained8 level). 
(b) The &Mission Request8 level will be the mission 
expanded request (formerly the &Preferred8 level). 
(c) Control levels (pre-set funding levels) will be 
incorporated into the &Freeze8 table by Operating Unit by 
Account, and funding for certain centrally-allocated 
activities and accounts will be locked into both the 
&Freeze8 and &Mission Request8 tables. 
(d) Cross-cutting Activities Table is no longer required. 
(e) Cross-Cutting Program Support (Objective 6) will not be 
broken out as part of either the &Freeze8 or &Mission 
Request8 levels at this time. 
(f) Performance Indicators will be required to justify 
requests for significant increases over the &Freeze8 level. 
 See paragraph 27 for more details. 
(g) The USAID-Managed Resources Table is no longer required. 
 
¶26.  All key documents, including budget levels, templates, 
points of contact and additional information resources 
necessary for completing FA requests are available through 
the FA link on the MSP help page. 
 
¶27.  Resource Tables:  Operating Units will develop two FA 
resource request tables for their FY 2011 submissions.  The 
first table, the &Freeze8 table, cannot exceed the FY 2010 
S-Approved level for that mission.  The second table, the 
&Mission Request8 is not limited to the &Freeze8 level. 
Account controls will be incorporated into the &Freeze8 
table but there are no account controls in the &Mission 
Request8 table, except as noted below. Control numbers for 
certain centrally-allocated activities and accounts will be 
locked into both the &Freeze8 and &Mission Request8 
tables. Operating Units are encouraged to submit reasonable 
requests that expand successful programs or fund new programs 
where significant funding constraints have existed. 
Information on earmarks, centrally-allocated activities and 
accounts, and Presidential Initiatives are available through 
the FA link on the MSP help page. 
 
¶28.  While FA requests included in MSPs serve as the 
foundation for the FY 2011 foreign assistance request 
process, there is no guarantee that Operating Units will 
receive funding at either the Freeze or Mission Request 
levels, or that the approved budget distributions will match 
MSP submissions. 
 
¶29.  Although the MSP application allows Operating Units to 
request TI funding, as a rule Operating Units should not 
request funding from this account.  For guidance on other 
restricted accounts and activities, see the Freeze Request 
and Mission Request paragraphs below. 
 
¶30.  Freeze Request Table:  The Freeze request total must 
maintain funding at the 2010 S-Approved Level by Operating 
Unit.  In the Freeze request, Operating Units should 
distribute the total Freeze request level across accounts, 
and then allocate those account amounts down to the area 
level (element for IIP).  Note that, except as specified 
 
STATE 00128957  006 OF 013 
 
 
below, there are no control levels on specific accounts. 
Operating Units may generally make adjustments within and 
between Program Area, (Program Element for the Investing in 
People Objective), and account levels, provided that the 
total amount requested for the mission does not exceed its 
total control level.  Funding levels for the following 
centrally-allocated activities and accounts will be 
pre-loaded and locked into the Freeze Table: 
 
     Non-Emergency Food Aid (P.L. 480) 
     HIV/AIDS (all accounts) 
     Malaria 
 
¶31.  Mission Request Table:  The Mission Request table can be 
used to request funding for FY 2011 above the total Freeze 
level, either to expand successful programs or fund new 
programs where significant funding constraints exist.  In 
reviewing these requests, F reviewers in Washington will be 
particularly interested in determining how past performance 
informs requests for changes in resource levels.  Significant 
increases must be justified using performance indicators (see 
paragraph 27).  Funding for the following centrally-allocated 
activities and accounts will be pre-loaded and locked into 
the Mission Request Table: 
 
     Non-Emergency Food Aid (P.L. 480) 
     HIV/AIDS (all accounts) 
     Malaria 
 
¶32.  Operating Units are also encouraged at a minimum to 
adhere to the Freeze levels for the following activities that 
were funded in FY 2010 due to the likelihood that these items 
will be earmarked or centrally-allocated. 
 
     Export Control and Border Security Assistance (NADR 
account) 
     Anti-Terrorism Assistance (NADR account) 
     Terrorist Interdiction Program (NADR account) 
     Counterterrorism Financing (NADR account) 
     Family Planning and Reproductive Health 
     Polio (the Maternal and Child Health element must at a 
minimum cover Polio) 
     Tuberculosis 
 
¶33.  While Missions are expected to adhere to the pre-loaded 
and locked Freeze and Request levels, they can comment on the 
levels being too high or two low and the probable 
result/impact of these levels. 
¶34.  Foreign Assistance Priorities Narratives:  Ongoing 
Foreign Assistance reforms aim to strengthen accountability 
for the performance and strategic impact of the Foreign 
Assistance budget.  While we can expect many activities to 
produce important short-term results, it is also critical to 
demonstrate that Foreign Assistance contributes to strategic 
long-term progress ) so that recipients are increasingly 
able to assume responsibility for meeting their own needs, 
are able to act responsibly in the international system, and 
are decreasingly dependent on U.S. and other external 
assistance over time.  It is recognized that this strategic 
progress requires sustained effort by both donors and 
recipients, and is not easily measured within a one-year 
budget planning cycle. 
 
¶35.  As one step toward improving accountability for program 
performance, each Mission is required to provide a narrative 
explaining the strategic basis for its FY 2011 Foreign 
Assistance priorities. An example of an FA priorities 
narrative will be available on the FA link on the MSP help 
page.  Narratives should include the following: 
 
a) Summarize the Mission,s core strategic goals for its 
Foreign Assistance programs (recognizing that the scope of 
Foreign Assistance goals may be narrower than the scope of 
overall Mission foreign policy goals); 
b) Describe, justify, and prioritize the specific proposals 
for additional resources shown in the Mission Request table 
(i.e., program area and IIP element level proposals that 
exceed the levels shown in the Freeze table), linking those 
proposals to the core strategic goals summarized in the 
previous section; 
c) Describe any cross-cutting strategic integration among 
different Foreign Assistance programs, and how those programs 
may be mutually-reinforcing in the context of the Mission,s 
overall strategic goals; 
d) Describe how proposed Foreign Assistance programs and 
other U.S. foreign policy tools (e.g., diplomatic 
interventions or military operations) may be 
mutually-reinforcing; 
e) Cite previous program performance (which may be drawn from 
the Budget and Performance Analysis (BPA) sections described 
below) or other relevant data that demonstrate why proposed 
additional resources can be expected to achieve the desired 
strategic results; 
 
STATE 00128957  007 OF 013 
 
 
f) Identify risk factors that may significantly affect 
expected program performance; 
g) Indicate if there are significant impacts on Operating 
Expenses requests; 
h) Where applicable, explain the extent to which earmarked or 
centrally-allocated funds (particularly in the health 
Elements) limit the ability to sufficiently budget for other 
ongoing and important programs in the Freeze request and 
Mission Request. 
 
¶36.  Four other general principles apply when writing FA 
Priorities Narratives: 
 
a) Priorities must be specifically linked to relevant program 
areas or IIP program elements within the five objectives of 
the Standard Program Structure for Foreign Assistance (Peace 
and Security, Governing Justly and Democratically, Investing 
in People, Economic Growth, and Humanitarian Assistance). 
b) Narratives should incorporate relevant information about 
assistance being provided by USG agencies other than State 
and USAID (including the MCC), and information about any 
assistance being provided by other multilateral or bilateral 
donors that is expected to significantly affect program 
performance. 
c) Operating Units that receive funding from regional or 
other programs should describe in their foreign assistance 
narrative how those funds will be used and what performance 
results will be achieved with them. 
d) Where appropriate, MSP narratives should address how 
Foreign Assistance funds are being used to support partner 
country priorities as reflected in Poverty Reduction Strategy 
Papers (PRSPs) or other country development plans, foster 
local ownership of the program/process, and build capacity of 
country systems. 
¶37.  Note: Where Missions have an approved Country Assistance 
Strategy (CAS), the MSP should discuss how the CAS supports 
the MSP.  Missions with USAID programs but without an 
approved CAS should briefly discuss how the USAID strategy 
supports and is consistent with the MSP.  If the USAID 
program is not covered by an active and approved USAID 
strategy, it should be stated.  This will aid in scheduling 
succeeding CAS countries and identifying USAID programs that 
may need an interim USAID strategy pending a CAS per a recent 
USAID Notice. 
¶38.  Budget and Performance Analysis:  As a continuation of 
the FY 2010 Congressional Budget Justification requirement 
from OMB for foreign assistance funds, Operating Units are 
also required to conduct a Budget and Performance Analysis 
for any increase from the Freeze to the Mission Request level 
that exceeds 10% and $1 million at the program area or IIP 
element level.  A BPA is only required for increases that 
meet this threshold.  A BPA consists of i) a brief 
explanation (one paragraph) of the impact the proposed 
increase would be expected to have on the Mission,s highest 
level strategic goals; and ii) selection of a performance 
indicator that will best measure program performance against 
those strategic objectives.  Each BPA should be linked to the 
Mission,s FA Priorities Narrative (described above).  For 
Operating Units with multiple increases exceeding these 
parameters, the number of BPAs required is capped at a 
maximum of five.  Operating Units with more than five 
increases above 10% and $1 million should conduct BPAs on the 
five largest increases. 
 
¶39.  A template for representative indicators and narratives 
can be found on the MSP home page.  This template includes 
detailed guidance with examples on how to conduct a BPA. The 
table requires actual performance data from FY 2008 and 
targets for FY 2009-11. 
 
¶40.  Where appropriate, Operating Units are encouraged to use 
an FA performance indicator for both a Goal Paper and for a 
BPA, though it is not required.  However, if an Operating 
Unit chooses to use an FA performance indicator for both a 
Goal Paper and a BPA, the Operating Unit will need to fill 
out the information in both the MSP system and the FA 
template if they are using the same indicator in both 
locations. 
 
FUNCTIONAL BUREAU GUIDANCE: 
Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (DRL): 
¶41.  The Congressionally-mandated democracy strategies 
requirement is being integrated into the MSP to minimize the 
burden on posts and the Department, as well as to consolidate 
our strategic planning.  Each COM in non-democratic or 
transitioning countries is required to develop democracy 
strategies to promote &democratic principles, practices and 
values and to support, as appropriate, nongovernmental 
organizations, individuals, and movements committed to 
democratic principles, practices and values8 under P.L. 
110-53, the Advancing Democratic Values Act (ADVA). (for 
definitions, see Sec. 2104 of ADVA, Title XXI of H.R. 1, 
posted on the DRL intranet website). Details about the how 
 
STATE 00128957  008 OF 013 
 
 
the democracy strategies should be incorporated into the MSP 
can be found in the &MSP overview and guidance8 section. 
Posts should request sufficient Foreign Assistance funds to 
ensure they have the ability to implement robust Governing 
Justly and Democratically (GJ&D) programs and activities. 
DRL requests that GJ&D goal papers focus on the four core 
elements of the F Foreign Assistance Framework for this 
objective: Rule of Law and Human Rights, Good Governance, 
Political Competition and Consensus-Building, and Civil 
Society (for definitions, see 
http://www.state.gov/f/c24132.htm). 
 Posts in democratic countries should focus their GJ&D 
objectives on ways to encourage host country support for 
human rights, labor and democracy initiatives elsewhere in 
the world. 
Bureau of Economic, Energy, and Business Affairs (EEB): 
¶42.  EEB,s FY 2010 Bureau Strategic Plan lays out EEB,s 
goals and policy tool indicators for advancing economic 
prosperity and security, combating terrorism and contributing 
to homeland security. Posts are also encouraged to use the 
Economic Engagement Matrix 
(http://web.rm.state.gov/eed/eed.htm) to help identify 
country or region-specific policy gaps. 
Posts should highlight important work on setting priorities 
and standards that reflect USG goals at international 
organizations on a range of issues, such as market-opening 
agreements, energy security, information and communications 
technology penetration rates, food security, international 
transportation concerns, anti-corruption efforts, 
intellectual property rights issues, and effective 
poverty-reduction programs.  Missions may wish to include 
indicators that pertain to efforts to increase U.S. trade and 
investment, and opportunities for U.S. business, including 
through Public Private Partnerships.  In MCC eligible and 
threshold countries, MSPs should incorporate indicators 
measuring progress in the MCC,s 17 performance indicators. 
Additional indicators could include benchmarks measuring 
implementation of structural economic reforms, including 
those needed to obtain the assistance of the IMF or World 
Bank for countries in crisis. Questions related to EBB 
guidance can be directed to Lillian Wasvary 
(WasvaryLG@state.gov).  Additional information can be found 
on our website, www.state.gov/e/eeb. 
Office of International Women,s Issues (G/IWI): 
¶43.  MSPs should consider the integration of women's rights 
issues into all aspects of U.S. foreign policy.  In 2008, 
G/IWI worked to raise awareness within the foreign policy 
community of global issues affecting women, including 
political and economic empowerment, forced/child marriage, 
women's property rights, violence against women, and the role 
of women in peace-building and post-conflict reconstruction. 
We encourage missions to develop programs and strategies that 
strengthen women's political, economic and social equality. 
Our office is available to all posts as a resource and 
advocate on international women's issues can be reached at 
(202) 312-9664.  Our website is: www.state.gov/g/wi. 
Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons (G/TIP): 
¶44.  Please note that Trafficking in Persons issues are 
covered in the Department,s Strategic Goals under Achieving 
Peace and Security.  Goal papers with performance indicators 
related to Trafficking in Persons issues should be linked to 
this strategic goal.  Inclusion of the anti-trafficking 
indicators reflects the Department,s commitment to promote 
and support efforts to eradicate modern-day slavery as part 
of its foreign policy priorities.  Goal papers should reflect 
diplomatic and programmatic efforts to assist governments in 
improving their anti-trafficking efforts, particularly in the 
law enforcement  and judicial efforts to arrest, prosecute, 
convict and  sentence traffickers, as well as enhancing the 
capacity of service providers to assist victims, and 
identifying ways to prevent victimization.  Posts should 
review the country narratives in the Department,s annual 
Trafficking in Persons Report for specific areas requiring 
attention.  Posts should also support anti-trafficking 
awareness training for embassy and mission personnel that 
includes guidance on handling information concerning 
potential trafficking situations as well as information on 
the USG,s zero-tolerance policy for contributing to or 
facilitating human trafficking.  Please contact Paula Goode 
at goodepr@state.gov with any questions.  Information on 
trafficking in persons is available at www.state.gov/g/tip/ . 
Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs 
(INL): 
¶45.  INCLE funded programs contribute towards the objectives 
of Peace and Security, and Governing Justly and 
Democratically.  Most INCLE Peace and Security programs fall 
within the following F program areas: Stabilization 
Operations and Security Sector Reform, Counter-Narcotics, and 
Transnational Crime.  Most Governing Justly and 
Democratically programs fall within the Rule of Law and Human 
Rights program area. 
¶46.  INL requests that posts use the Foreign Assistance 
Priorities section of the MSP to discuss on-going INCLE 
 
STATE 00128957  009 OF 013 
 
 
programs.  If the MSP includes an increased funding request 
for a new or significantly expanded program, please include 
this request in the Foreign Assistance Priorities section and 
in the Foreign Assistance resource tables, as appropriate. 
Include requested staff increases for full time Narcotics 
Affairs Officers or Law Enforcement Affairs Coordinators in 
the Foreign Assistance Priorities section and in the Foreign 
Assistance resource tables; these staff positions are not 
funded through State Operations and must be accounted for 
through the Foreign Assistance resource requests.  If the 
requested increase in funding is substantial, please elevate 
its discussion to a Goal Paper.  Any performance indicators 
included in the MSP should coincide with those used in the 
Operational Plan and in Bilateral Letters of Agreement. 
Please send questions to Keira Goldstein 
(goldsteinka@state.gov) or Larry Bird (birdlf@state.gov). 
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation (ISN): 
¶47.  We rely on posts, assistance to promote our objectives 
and programs, in particular:  the Global Initiative to Combat 
Nuclear Terrorism; the Proliferation Security Initiative; 
implementation of Iran and North Korean UN Security Council 
Resolutions; implementation of UNSCR 1540; proliferation 
finance; strengthening the NPT and IAEA safeguards and other 
arms control and nonproliferation agreements; and controlling 
conventional weapons transfers, including MANPADS.  We ask 
that post  report activities and goals, as appropriate in 
MSPs.  Please see http://state.gov/t/isn for details of the 
Bureau,s activities.  Questions can be directed to Jamie 
Young (youngja2@state.gov).  ISN manages two NADR foreign 
assistance programs of relevance to the region: 
-- Export Control and Related Border Security (EXBS) provides 
targeted assistance to strengthen countries, strategic trade 
and border control infrastructure and capabilities aimed at 
prevent WMD (and MANPADS) proliferation and trafficking.  The 
program is centrally planned and implemented by ISN, but we 
work closely with embassies to tailor programs for host 
countries and we encourage embassies to address the program 
in MSPs.  We seek a major increase in EXBS funding for the 
region in FY10 that we will want to sustain in FY11.  This 
program falls under 1.2.1 (Peace and Security, 
Nonproliferation) in the FA matrix.  For details on the EXBS 
program, see our website at www.exportcontrol.org or contact 
Lisa Jacobson at JacobsonLE@state.gov. 
-- Global Threat Reduction (GTR) programs provide assistance 
to prevent the proliferation of WMD expertise and materials 
and have the added benefit of contributing to general science 
and technology development, economic growth, and 
counterterrorism.  GTR manages programs to engage and 
redirect former WMD experts in Iraq and Libya.  Other GTR 
programs include the Biosecurity Engagement Program, Chemical 
Security Engagement Program, and Nuclear Security Assistance 
Program.  For more information on GTR programs, see our 
websites at www.bepstate.net; www.biistate.net; www.stcu.int; 
www.istc.ru; www.nsoi-state.net; or contact Matthias Mitman, 
Director (MitmanMJ@state.gov). 
Bureau of Oceans, and International Environment and 
Scientific Affairs (OES): 
¶48.  OES encourages all Environment Science Technology and 
Health (ESTH) officers and Environmental Hub officers in the 
field to participate actively in the MSP development process. 
 While much of ESTH work is centered in Investing in People 
(health, including water) and Economic Growth (Environment 
Program Area, and Infrastructure/Modern Energy Services), it 
can also reinforce our efforts at Peace and Security, 
Governing Justly, and Humanitarian Assistance by promoting 
sustainable economies while reinforcing rule of law and 
transparent democratic institutions in key sectors. 
Accordingly, Posts are encouraged to look to the ESTH 
officers, Hub officers, and OES for assistance in identifying 
mission priorities and programs in the ESTH field in support 
of the following priorities. 
     Advancing the U.S. agenda on climate change 
     Pollution abatement 
     Promoting the sustainable use of renewable natural 
resources, including forests, wildlife, and marine resources 
     Improving access to safe water and sanitation services 
     Preparing for the challenges posed by polio, malaria 
and other infectious diseases 
     Compliance with the environmental aspects of trade 
agreements 
Public Diplomacy (PD): 
¶49.  Posts are encouraged to submit a separate PD paper and 
urged to ensure that PD is appropriately reflected in the COM 
statement and policy goal papers. For Public Diplomacy MSP 
Goal Papers, posts should use indicators that appear on the 
list of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved PD 
performance indicators and reflect PD,s adherence to federal 
government mandates.  A link to the PD indicators can be 
found on the MSP Policy Guidance page under the heading 
Useful Documents.  Our core list of indicators 15 for PD and 
8 for IIP is meant to ease the burden of writing and/or 
identifying acceptable performance indicators for goal 
papers.  Use of the core PD indicators helps us in our 
 
STATE 00128957  010 OF 013 
 
 
engagement with OMB, GAO and Congress. Please contact 
Cherreka Montgomery (montgomeryce@state.gov) with any 
questions concerning public diplomacy indicators and goal 
papers. 
Bureau of Political-Military Affairs (PM): 
¶50.  Funding for military or defense-related programs, 
projects, or training includes Foreign Military 
Financing(FMF), International Military Education and Training 
(IMET), and Peacekeeping Operations (PKO) resources.  Funding 
priorities  include: using strategic and focused foreign 
assistance to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhancing 
regional stability by strengthening ties with friends and 
allies and resolving regional conflicts, and supporting the 
war on terrorism.  The focus should be on the development of 
accountable, right-sized, effective, interoperable, and 
professional security forces and institutions, almost always 
under the command and control of the Ministry of Defense 
(with rare exceptions on case-by-case review, led by PM 
Affairs in consultation with the Legal Advisor's Office). 
¶51.  Posts should delineate assistance activities that 
address short-term needs (e.g., deployment to an existing 
peacekeeping operation) as well as longer-term goals (e.g., 
military modernization, security sector reform, or building 
niche capabilities for coalition operations).  In listing the 
external factors that could influence the goal's 
accomplishment in the "Goal Description" section, please also 
indicate a relationship to external funding sources (to 
include those provided by the Department of Defense) to meet 
the same goals. 
¶52.  Missions planning to request NADR Conventional Weapons 
Destruction program resources are asked to justify according 
to the following priorities: prevent/reduce terrorist access 
to conventional weapons (with priority given to MANPADS) and 
munitions and foster regional stability through improved 
security.  For humanitarian demining (HD) programs, or 
International Trust Fund (ITF) support, guiding priorities 
are: contribute to humanitarian efforts by protecting the 
victims of conflict, restore land and infrastructure 
contaminated by explosive remnants of war to productive use, 
and prevent civilian injuries from the detonation of unstable 
and/or loosely secured munitions near population centers. 
Under external factors, missions are requested to include 
external funding sources (DOD, UN, regional organizations, 
etc.) to meet the same goals, and explain how U.S. assistance 
would augment or complement any ongoing work. 
Civilian-Military Cooperation 
¶53.  In locations where appropriate, the MSP should address 
the following: 
¶A.  Civilian-Military Cooperation.  Briefly describe the 
state of civilian-military cooperation at post, including 
future plans or opportunities, and highlight any activities 
for FY 2011 (e.g.; ship visits or civil affairs activities) 
which demonstrate civilian-military cooperation. 
¶B.  Ongoing Programs.  Where programs are currently being 
implemented jointly by civilian agencies and the US military, 
describe how they contribute to the overall achievement of 
Mission goals. 
¶C.  Coordination mechanisms.  Operating units should discuss 
formal coordination mechanisms at post between military 
representatives and civilian agencies, particularly those 
that employ joint planning approaches.  For ongoing 1206, 
Foreign Military Sales (FMS) or International Military 
Education and Training (IMET) or related programs implemented 
by the military at post, discuss how they complement or 
enhance civilian efforts. 
¶D.  Opportunities.  If the post has identified opportunities 
for enhanced civilian-military cooperation that require 
further Washington involvement, or for which Washington 
civilian agency support is requested. 
Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM): 
¶54.  Humanitarian assistance is a relevant objective for 
posts in countries: (1) hosting refugees, internally 
displaced persons (IDPs), stateless populations, vulnerable 
migrants, and/or victims of trafficking; (2) receiving 
refugee returnees; (3) experiencing or at risk of 
humanitarian crisis; (4) developing migration management 
systems; or (5) providing significant donor support to 
international humanitarian organizations.  The Bureau of 
Population, Refugees, and Migration (PRM) serves as a 
resource to Posts on any of these issues; please see detailed 
MSP guidance at http://prm.state.gov.  Please contact Deborah 
Hooker at HookerDJ@state.gov or (202) 663-1042. 
¶55.  PRM funding includes the Migration and Refugee 
Assistance (MRA) and Emergency Refugee and Migration 
Assistance (ERMA) accounts.  Neither MRA nor ERMA is 
available for programming directly by posts.  If there are 
key humanitarian assistance needs relating to refugees, IDPs, 
or other conflict victims that could benefit from other 
funding sources available to post, posts may include these in 
their budget requests.  Region-specific guidance below 
supplements PRM,s detailed MSP guidance (see 
http://prm.state.gov), which defines humanitarian programs 
and relevant indicators. 
 
STATE 00128957  011 OF 013 
 
 
¶56.  Humanitarian assistance in the Near East includes 
significant policies and programs in support of Palestinian 
and Iraqi refugees, Iraqi IDPs, and other conflict victims 
throughout the region.  In the West Bank, Gaza, Jordan, 
Lebanon and Syria, government support of the UN Relief and 
Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) 
is key to the success of major health and education 
operations.  Protection, assistance and solutions for Iraqis 
in the region remain high priorities, including access to 
asylum and non-refoulement, access to education and health 
care, protection for victims of trafficking, safe, gradual 
and voluntary return when the situation permits, and refugee 
resettlement in the United States. The protection of other 
refugees, asylum seekers, stateless persons, TIP victims and 
other vulnerable migrants in Israel, Egypt Yemen, and 
throughout the Gulf also remain a priority. 
S/CRS 
¶57.  In preparation for this year,s Mission Strategic Plan 
(MSP), posts facing current or potential conflict, 
particularly those on the Intelligence Community,s Internal 
Instability Watchlist (available at www.state.sgov/s/crs/), 
or identified by F as a Rebuilding country, are requested by 
S/CRS to include an analytical paragraph in the Chief of 
Mission Statement on conflict in the country or region.  The 
paragraph should identify key causes of current or potential 
conflict and highlight any recent or anticipated changes in 
the situation.  Posts should identify what opportunities 
exist to address conflict, and describe how the country team 
is planning to respond including allocating resources. 
Missions should discuss their ability to monitor and 
influence sources of conflict and indicate what, if any, 
additional resources would be required to do so, including 
assistance from the Office of the Coordinator for 
Reconstruction and Stabilization (S/CRS).  Posts should also 
consider conflict issues in developing goal papers and 
relevant indicators for the MSP. 
¶58.  S/CRS can assist Missions in conducting this analysis 
and targeted planning, including addressing contingencies, 
using tools such as best practices guides, the Interagency 
Conflict Assessment Framework, and the USG Planning Framework 
for Reconstruction, Stabilization, and Conflict 
Transformation and possible access to Reconstruction and 
Stabilization funds through the use of 1207 authority.  For 
more information or to request any of these services from 
S/CRS, please contact s/crs rmo@state.gov.  Information is 
also available from http://www.crs.state.gov. 
Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism (S/CT): 
¶59.  Posts that choose to write a CT goal paper should 
structure it by the following expected outcomes: the extent 
to which the government of the foreign country is cooperating 
with the United States Government in apprehending, 
convicting, and punishing terrorists; the actions by the 
country eliminating terrorist safe havens; country,s 
political will to fight terrorism, including passing and 
implementing legislation; country,s receptivity to ATA 
training; followed by measuring results; building coalitions 
in regional and multilateral organizations, including terror 
finance regimes; efforts in border security; efforts to fight 
radicalization and/or rehabilitate and reintegrate lower-rung 
terrorists back into society.  Posts in major donor countries 
may wish to identify those nations, support for key U.S. 
objectives in the developing world, such as capacity-building 
and improving governance in failed or fragile states. 
Questions should be directed to Dan Rosen (RosenDA@state.gov) 
Office of the Global Aids Coordinator (S/GAC): 
¶60.  The Department urges countries with significant or 
growing epidemics to make HIV/AIDS programming and public 
diplomacy a priority in their FY 2011 MSP.  Any HIV/AIDS 
indicators included should be consistent with President,s 
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)-approved indicators. 
If Posts have further questions on this guidance, please 
contact Sara Allinder (AllinderSM@state.gov) or Karin Fenn 
(FennKM@state.gov). 
Bureau of Verification, Compliance, and Implementation (VCI): 
¶61.  As appropriate, posts are requested to consider the 
following in development of MSPs 
 
-- Engage in active bilateral and multilateral diplomacy to 
strengthen international understanding of the need for full 
compliance with arms control, nonproliferation, and 
disarmament obligations and commitments, as well as the need 
for a robust international response to noncompliance. 
 
-- Reference the findings of the President,s &Report on 
Adherence to and Compliance with Arms Control, 
Nonproliferation, and Disarmament Agreements and 
Commitments8 (http://www.state.gov/t/vci/rls/rpt/c9721) when 
planning for actions related to specific compliance issues 
involving host governments and seek cooperation with host 
governments to address countries of concern.  (For details, 
contact Tim MacGregor, VCI Senior Advisor for Compliance, at 
MacGregorTS@state.gov.) 
 
 
STATE 00128957  012 OF 013 
 
 
-- Seek support for Iran,s compliance with UNSC Resolutions 
and IAEA Board of Governors, Resolutions requiring Iran to 
suspend its nuclear enrichment effort, cooperate fully with 
the IAEA to ascertain the true nature of Iran,s past nuclear 
activities, restore international confidence in the peaceful 
nature of Iran,s current nuclear program, and bring Iran 
back into full compliance with the NPT and its IAEA 
Safeguards agreement.  (For details, contact Whitney Raas, at 
RaasWL@state.gov) 
 
-- Bolster support for enforcing compliance with 
nonproliferation treaties and commitments through physical 
interdiction and political and economic sanctions, where 
appropriate, (includes sanctions determinations pursuant to 
the semi-annual Iran, North Korea, Syria Nonproliferation 
Act); and urge host governments to enhance domestic laws and 
regulations to stem proliferation.  (For details, contact 
Stephen Tomchik, Senior Advisor for Sanctions, at 
TomchikSJ@state.gov.) 
 
-- Support improved responses to potential biological weapons 
incidents in order to deter attacks and enhance U.S. ability 
to make compliance and attribution determinations.  Promote 
compliance with the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) and 
with efforts to ensure regional and universal compliance with 
the Convention.  (For details, contact Brian Nordmann, VCI/BW 
Director, at NordmaBR@state.gov.) 
 
-- Promote compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention 
(CWC) and work with the Organization for the Prohibition of 
Chemical Weapons to ensure that the verification regime 
remains viable and continues to keep pace with changes in the 
chemical industry and technological advances; support 
assessment of the robustness of the CWC inspection regime to 
ensure effective verification of declared military and 
industrial facilities. (For details, contact Johnathan 
Beckett, VCI/CCA Deputy Director for CW, at 
BecketJo@state.gov.) 
(VCI/FO Coordinator, Janey Wright, at WrightJF@state.gov.) 
MANAGEMENT BUREAU GUIDANCE 
Foreign Service Institute: 
¶62.  Posts are asked, as part of their strategic planning 
discussions, to consider training as a key element in the 
development and management of their human resources; and when 
proposing new or expanded activities that may involve a 
training component to factor in or note, when applicable, the 
impact to centralized training and post assignment travel 
resources that are overseen by FSI and HR respectively. 
Bureau of Consular Affairs (CA): 
¶63.  CA encourages all consular sections to ensure that 
consular priorities are properly addressed in the FY 2011 
MSPs.  Consular sections should critically examine their 
projected consular workload for FY 2011 and beyond and ensure 
any necessary facilities and personnel requests are included 
in the State Operations and U.S. Direct Hire Requests 
sections.  Under the current strategic framework, consular 
services are addressed in the strategic goal on 
&Strengthening Consular and Management Capabilities,8 
though our work also relates to the &Achieving Peace and 
Security8 and &Promoting International Understanding8 
strategic goals. 
 
¶64.  Depending on foreign policy priorities in host country, 
posts may choose to include consular-specific goal papers or 
incorporate consular services into the COM statement or 
broader mission goal papers.  For example, posts working to 
improve rule of law may want to include accession to 
multilateral treaties affecting private Americans (e.g. Hague 
adoption or abduction conventions, prisoner transfer 
treaties, etc.).  Law enforcement capacity-building and 
security information-sharing may be top mission priorities, 
providing opportunities to highlight the contribution of 
consular fraud prevention objectives.  Post public diplomacy 
efforts should address the consular role, both in public 
outreach and in the tangible experience of each individual 
applicant who visits the consular section.  These priorities 
can have direct resource implications on consular sections, 
so we encourage posts to take a good look at FY 2011 during 
the MSP process and plan for the opportunities and 
requirements it has in store. If posts have questions 
regarding consular priorities in the MSP process, please 
contact the CA/P Special Assistant at 
CA-PSpecialAssistant@state.gov or 202-647-5483. 
Bureau of Diplomatic Security (DS): 
¶65.  DS is initiating coordination with all posts through a 
separate communication to RSOs to identify post's 
security-related requests and to integrate those requests 
into the DS strategic planning process and Congressional 
Budget Justification input.  Post management should also 
consider security costs associated with new activities, 
policies, or programs and discuss them with their RSO for 
onward submission to DS in Washington. 
For the purpose of the MSP, posts should highlight those 
 
STATE 00128957  013 OF 013 
 
 
security issues which significantly impact their ability to 
achieve their strategic goals.    These security requirements 
should be reflected, as appropriate, in the COM statement and 
the resource and position request tables. 
Office of Policy, Rightsizing and Innovation (M/PRI): 
¶66.  The MSP is a vehicle for COMs and their country teams to 
examine their operations in the context of rightsizing and 
quality management goals.  Rightsizing:  Duplicative 
functions at post should be consolidated.  Functions that can 
be performed by personnel based in the United States or at 
regional offices overseas should not be performed at post. 
Posts should look for possibilities to empower locally 
employed staff so they may perform functions in place of U.S. 
direct hire personnel. In post,s reviews, should it find 
staffing to be either excessive or inadequate to the 
performance of priority Mission goals and objectives, please 
initiate staffing change requests in accordance with 
established procedures.   A review of new non-State overseas 
positions requested through the NSDD-38 process has found 
that only a small percentage of them had been included in 
those missions, MSP submissions, suggesting that there needs 
to be better integration of all agencies, plans in the MSP 
process. 
¶67.  Tripoli minimize considered. 
RICE