VZCZCXRO7732
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3511/01 2130813
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 010813Z AUG 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6023
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RUALSFJ/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 4765
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 2337
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 5937
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 1383
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 3111
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 8145
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 4211
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 5231

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 003511 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 08/01/07-1 
 
Index: 
 
(1) US House approves "comfort women" resolution, emphasizes human 
rights aspect 
 
(2) US House passes comfort women resolution, Abe's historical view 
of the war rejected 
 
(3) Editorial: Mistaken historical views must be prevented from 
developing a life of its own 
 
(4) Editorial: The comfort women resolution harms Japan-US 
relations 
 
(5) US House adoption of comfort women resolution may cast pall on 
Japan-US relations 
 
(6) Editorial: Comfort women resolution; Rectify factual errors 
through joint efforts between government and private sector 
 
(7) Estimation of Lower House election, based on votes ruling and 
opposition parties gained in Upper House election 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) US House approves "comfort women" resolution, emphasizes human 
rights aspect 
 
YOMIURI (Page 15) (Abridged) 
August 1, 2007 
 
Aya Igarashi, Washington 
 
The United States House of Representatives on July 30 approved a 
resolution asking for an official apology from Japan over the issue 
of the so-called wartime comfort women.  There is the possibility 
that this issue may again flare as a dispute between Japan and the 
US in the future as well. 
 
In the full House on the afternoon of July 30 (before dawn on July 
31, Japan time), when the resolution was adopted, eight Republican 
and Democratic lawmakers rebuked Japan. 
 
Tom Lantos (D-CA), chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, is 
a Holocaust survivor. He praised Germany's way of atoning for the 
misdeeds of the last war, but he blasted Japan, describing it as 
suffering from historical amnesia. 
 
The female ranking Republican on the House Foreign Affairs 
Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), saw the comfort women issue 
in the same light of violence to women in Darfur in Africa and 
stressed: "This sort of issue is still a problem even today." 
 
One characteristic of debates on the comfort women issue in the 
Congress was that the issue was regarded as a present-day human 
rights issue not a past "historical issue." 
 
This tendency is strong particularly in the Democratic Party, which 
is portrayed as being pro-human rights and liberal as represented by 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and which has taken the control of the 
House since the last November mid-term election. But even among the 
Republicans, there were few who were sympathetic towards Japan. 
 
TOKYO 00003511  002 OF 010 
 
 
 
In the public gallery of the hall, former comfort women Yi Yong Su 
listened to the deliberations on the resolution. In the face of this 
living witness, Japan's assertion that there were no documents 
indicating that women had been forced to work as comfort women was 
ignored and only incurred backlashes. 
 
In contrast to the heated debate in the Congress, the vast majority 
of the American public is less interested in the passage of the 
"comfort women" resolution. The Washington Post in its July 30 
edition reported on the approval of the resolution in a small story 
dispatched by a news agency. 
 
Both Japan and the US at one point strived to resolve the issue in a 
way so as not to let this "thorn" affect the entirety of the 
Japan-US alliance. 
 
The leaders of the House gave consideration to Japan by deciding to 
take a vote on the resolution on July 30 after Japan's Upper House 
election in order to prevent any possible impact on the election. On 
July 31, the House committee approved another resolution highly 
praising Japan's assistance to Iraq as a means to keep a balance 
with the "comfort women" resolution. 
 
The Democrats are positive about strengthening ties with Japan, an 
ally, envisioning an opportunity to again returnt the post of 
president to the party in the 2008 election. 
 
Michael Green, former senior director for Asian Affairs at the 
National Security Council, said: "The members of the Congress can't 
say no to human rights issues. They tried to minimize the impact of 
the passage of the resolution by giving consideration in a 
meticulous manner." 
 
The Nanjing Incident will mark its 70th anniversary in December of 
this year. One journalist knowledgeable about the moves of Chinese 
and Korean organizations in the US commented: "Some have already 
begun seeking another resolution behind the scenes." 
 
In California, the state from which Representative Michael Honda has 
been elected, the Korean and Chinese communities are gaining 
political influence. Honda stressed, "It's incorrect to think I have 
acted according to instructions from the Chinese government." But 
pressure for the submission of a similar resolution is likely to 
increase every time the composition of the Congress changes, as a 
result of congressional elections being held every two years. 
 
It is not good if neither Japan nor the US takes any action, even 
though both sides share the view that they cannot let the 
comfort-women issue cast a pall on the bilateral alliance. Japan and 
the US must make even more efforts to put this matter to rest and 
are urged to constrain themselves even further. 
 
(2) US House passes comfort women resolution, Abe's historical view 
of the war rejected 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 3) (Full) 
August 1, 2007 
 
Yasuyuki Oguri, Washington 
 
The US House of Representatives on July 30 unanimously passed a 
 
TOKYO 00003511  003 OF 010 
 
 
resolution calling on the Japanese government to formally apologize 
to the comfort women of World War II. The passage of the resolution 
is another blow to Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, who has suffered from 
a setback in Sunday's House of Councillors election. Why did the US 
House of Representatives approve of the resolution? How will the Abe 
administration respond to the US treatment? This newspaper will 
attempt to analyze the background of the US House's approval of the 
resolution and the future of it. 
 
US House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom 
Lantos emphasized in a statement released immediately before the 
vote on July 30: "After the end of World War II, Germany made the 
right choice. Meanwhile, Japan has actively tried to forget." He 
criticized the Japanese government for refusing to formally 
apologize. 
 
A number of resolutions urging Japan to apologize over the Imperial 
Japanese Army's barbaric acts were submitted to the US House of 
Representatives, but the House did not pass any of them, as the 
Japanese government's lobbying was successful. The government, 
however, failed this time around. A source familiar with Japan-US 
relations said that it was difficult for the Japanese side to oppose 
a human rights issue. 
 
The reason for the US House having turned a deaf ear to Tokyo's 
assertion that it has already offered apologies is that Washington 
has begun harboring doubts about Japan's attitude toward the history 
issue, although the Japan-US alliance has strengthened through the 
dispatch of Japan's Self-Defense Forces (SDF) and other 
cooperation. 
 
Abe claimed in March there was no proof the Imperial Japanese Army 
coerced the women into brothels. Some lawmakers from the ruling 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the main opposition party, 
Minshuto (Democratic Party of Japan), put an advertisement in the 
Washington Post claiming that there is no historical document 
proving that foreign women were forced into wartime brothels. 
 
However, these efforts ultimately backfired. The House of 
Representatives saw Japan's assertion as proof of it not reflecting 
on its past conduct, prompting it to approve the resolution. US Asia 
Policy Point Director Mindy Kotler took the view that the US House 
of Representatives felt annoyed with Prime Minister Abe's influence, 
as well as trends in Japan regarding (history issue) as seen in the 
prime minister's remarks. Kotler analyzed the US House expressed its 
doubts about a change in Japan's historical view of the war. 
 
If Abe mishandles the comfort women resolution, criticism will flare 
up again 
 
There were cautious views about the comfort women resolution in the 
US House of Representatives for fear of a possible negative impact 
on bilateral relations. In the process of discussion on the 
resolution, which was presented by Democratic Rep. Mike Honda, 
Democratic Senator Daniel Inouye protested the trend of calling on 
Japan to apologize, saying: "The United States also made historical 
mistakes. But no countries have urged us to acknowledge, apologize 
and accept historical responsibility." However, Inouye's comment was 
unable to change the mood in favor of the resolution in the 
Congress. 
 
Meanwhile, the expectation is that the Japanese government will 
 
TOKYO 00003511  004 OF 010 
 
 
ignore the resolution from the position that Japan already 
apologized in the 1993 statement issued by then Chief Cabinet 
Secretary Yohei Kono. Should Abe offer a formal apology, he will 
 
SIPDIS 
likely come under pressure from hawkish Diet members. 
 
If the Japanese government expressly ignores the resolution, 
Congress might stiffen its position. Although a source familiar with 
Japan-US relations said that bilateral relations would not worsen by 
the US House's approval of the resolution, the general view is that 
unless the Japanese government takes specific measures, the issue 
will smolder between Japan and the United States. 
 
It is certain that criticism of Abe's remarks in March will grow 
again as the government failed to prevent the US House of 
Representatives from passing the resolution. Following the setback 
in the Upper House election, Abe is now facing difficulty in dealing 
with the issue. 
 
(3) Editorial: Mistaken historical views must be prevented from 
developing a life of its own 
 
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Full) 
August 1, 2007 
 
The United States House of Representatives adopted a resolution 
calling on the Japanese government to officially apologize over the 
so-called comfort women issue. This resolution is apparently based 
on an erroneous perception of the facts. Although it has no binding 
power, we cannot overlook the passage of the resolution. 
 
The resolution says: "The Japanese Imperial Army coerced young women 
in various Asian countries into sexual slavery." 
 
The Japan-US alliance naturally carries an extremely significant 
meaning in light of Japan's national interests. Both countries have 
established close ties on the military and economic fronts and also 
share such core values as democracy and human rights. 
 
Japan, however, must present a counterargument against the 
resolution, which differs from the actual facts. If a mistaken view 
of history develops a life of its own, the source of a problem might 
be left untouched to trouble future Japan-US relations. 
 
In the early 1990s, a certain newspaper reported that the Japanese 
government had forcibly recruited women under the name of volunteer 
corps. That article was totally contrary to the facts. 
 
The statement issued in 1993 by Chief Cabinet Secretary Kono 
included descriptions that could be taken as constituted authorities 
having brought in young women as comfort women against their will. 
Reading the statement, many people inside and outside Japan began to 
have an erroneous perception of the facts. 
 
There is no evidence to prove the government coerced recruited 
comfort women. The Japanese government has also repeatedly explained 
that fact. 
 
In Japan, as well, there are some who insist that there was coercive 
recruitment. Such people, without specifying the contents of what is 
meant by "coercive," regard the US resolution as only natural. 
 
The resolution says: "The comfort women system is one of the largest 
 
TOKYO 00003511  005 OF 010 
 
 
cases of human trafficking in the 20th century." 
 
It has been disclosed that the US occupation army made use of 
comfort stations in Japan. During the Korean War, there were such 
facilities for South Korean soldiers. 
 
During World War II, there were also comfort stations for German 
soldiers, and young women in areas occupied by Germany were 
recruited systematically and coercively. 
 
Why has Congress made only Japan the target of its attack? That is 
because of the presence of a China-affiliated anti-Japanese group 
supporting Democratic Congressman Michael Honda, who submitted the 
resolution. There is not an anti-Germany group. Of course, there is 
no group pursuing the US military for its "moral" responsibility. 
 
In the Democratic Party-controlled US Congress, a similar resolution 
to the comfort-women one could be adopted in the future. Japanese 
diplomats must make more efforts to clear up the United States' 
misunderstanding. 
 
(4) Editorial: The comfort women resolution harms Japan-US 
relations 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
August 1, 2007 
 
The approval of the comfort women resolution by the US House of 
Representatives will probably end up harming Japan-United States 
relations. This is a worrisome situation. 
 
Meanwhile, the US House of Representatives Committee on Foreign 
Affairs yesterday was set to approve a resolution thanking Japan for 
its contributions to the Japan alliance. If this resolution is meant 
to counterbalance the comfort women resolution, this signals that 
the committee members themselves recognize the negative effect that 
the resolution will have on bilateral relations. 
 
This resolution is one of over a thousand that the House approves 
each year. It is a document that holds no legal binding. Although 
there is no need to overreact, we cannot close our eyes to the 
resolution's adverse effects on the relationship between Japan and 
the US. 
 
The resolution calls for an official apology from the Japanese 
government and the prime minister. The Japanese government, by means 
of a 1993 statement by then-Chief Cabinet Secretary Yohei Kono, did 
officially apologize to the former comfort women. The government 
also offered them compensation through the Asian Women's Fund. 
 
During his April visit to the US, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe met with 
President Bush and congressional leaders and stated: "As an 
individual and as prime minister, I deeply sympathize with the 
former comfort women who suffered hardship and am filled with regret 
that they were placed in such painful circumstances." This is close 
to the official apology called for in the resolution. 
 
Before Abe's US visit, when the US side was intensifying its 
criticism of Japan regarding this issue, we wrote that "the 
strangeness of hearing the US criticize Japan more vociferously than 
China or South Korea is similar to the feeling that Americans get 
when they hear Japan criticizing the US about its past treatment of 
 
TOKYO 00003511  006 OF 010 
 
 
Native Americans." We cannot help but feel the same way about the US 
House's approval of a resolution asking for yet another apology. 
 
This action, which could damage the image of Japan in the US and 
stir up anti-US sentiment in Japan, is detrimental to both 
countries. Besides the resolution, an increasing number of negative 
elements have been growing between Japan and the US. 
 
In Japan, there is a great deal of discontent with the Bush 
administration's conciliatory approach towards North Korea. Ichiro 
Ozawa, the leader of the Democratic Party of Japan, the new majority 
party in the Upper House, has stated his opposition to an extension 
of the Anti-Terrorism Special Measures Law. If the Self-Defense 
Force's refueling missions in the Indian Ocean are discontinued, the 
US will lose faith in Japan. 
 
Having lost their political momentum, both the Abe and Bush 
administrations are finding it increasingly difficult to resolve 
problems. The comfort-women resolution is another unfavorable sign 
for Japan-US relations. As a result, there is a high possibility 
that the criticism of the Abe cabinet that is bound to come will act 
as a kind of centrifugal force putting more distance between Japan 
and the US. 
 
(5) US House adoption of comfort women resolution may cast pall on 
Japan-US relations 
 
ASAHI (Page 9) (Abridged slightly) 
August 1, 2007 
 
The US House of Representatives approved a resolution on July 30 
calling for an official apology from Japan over the so-called 
comfort women system of forced military prostitution before and 
during World War II. Ever since the resolution was submitted this 
January, Tokyo has lobbied against the US House for fear that it 
will have a harmful effect on Japan-US relations. That did not pay 
off. Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's words and deeds that drew a strong 
reaction from the United States attributed to the House's approval 
of the resolution. Although the position of the United States, which 
regards the comfort women issue as a human rights abuse, is to give 
advice as a "friend," the step is likely to leave some hard feelings 
in Japan. Depending on how matters turn out, the thorny historical 
issue with neighboring countries might cast a pall over Japan-US 
relations, as well. 
 
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Tom Lantos (D-Calif.) said 
in the July 30 session: "Japan's refusal to make an official 
government apology is disturbing to all who value US-Japan 
relations." Mike Honda (D-Calif.), a sponsor of the resolution, too, 
said: "We must teach future generations that this horror must never 
be repeated again." The resolution was adopted with a majority 
approval without any objections. 
 
Both Lantos and Honda come from California where there is a large 
Asian-American population. In fact, in Honda's constituency, 
Asian-Americans account for about 30% of the total population. With 
the election of the US House of Representatives scheduled to take 
place next year along with the presidential election, the wishes of 
Korean organizations that have lobbied for the adoption of the 
comfort women resolution cannot be ignored. Honda spent his early 
childhood in a World War II internment camp where he himself 
suffered from human-rights abuse. The US Congress, acknowledging its 
 
TOKYO 00003511  007 OF 010 
 
 
responsibility for the internment of Japanese-Americans, eventually 
adopted legislation compensating the victims for such treatment 
during the war. The president also sent letters of apology to them. 
 
Earlier, in the period of the Republican-led US Congress, four 
comfort-women resolutions were submitted, but none was adopted. The 
US House adoption of the resolution this time comes partly from the 
shift of power to the Democrats through the midterm election last 
year and Prime Minister Abe's words and deeds. 
 
Tokyo's position was that the Japanese government had already 
apologized, citing the 1993 statement released by then Chief Cabinet 
Secretary Yohei Kono. 
 
SIPDIS 
 
Then on March 1, Prime Minister Abe told reporters, "There is no 
evidence to prove there was coercion," adding, "There is no evidence 
to prove the use of coercion in the narrow sense." 
 
This complex explanation was taken to mean that Japan backed away 
from the Kono statement, and US lawmakers reacted furiously, saying 
Japan had not offered an official apology. The situation worsened 
with Abe's defiant comment that Tokyo would not offer another 
apology because the US Congress was about to adopt the resolution. 
 
Finally becoming aware of the deteriorating situation in early 
April, Abe offered an explanation to President Bush on the phone. 
That was followed by his apology to Bush and US House Speaker Pelosi 
during his visit to the United States in late April. The storm 
calmed down temporarily, but the trend of adopting the resolution 
again gathered momentum with a full-page protest advertisement that 
ran in the June 14 issue of the Washington Post, submitted by a 
group of Japanese lawmakers and others discontented with the 
resolution. 
 
A sense of mission peculiar to the US 
 
"The adopted resolution is not intended to blame the Japanese 
people. They are words as a friend." Meeting the press after 
adopting the resolution, Mike Honda, a sponsor of the resolution, 
stressed that resolution was not intended to attack Japan. 
 
Mike Mochizuki, a George Washington University associate professor 
known for his studies of Japan, also said: "The resolution is a 
message to Japan by American political leaders as their friends. It 
is not an anti-Japanese resolution." 
 
A perception gap exists between Japan and the United States on the 
resolution. Above all, America's intent is hard to understand in 
Japan. 
 
The US House was considerate enough to adopt the resolution after 
Japan's House of Councillors election. Although it was a fact that 
the resolution's adoption was triggered by Prime Minister Abe's 
words, it did not target Abe. 
 
On July 31, the US House also approved a resolution recognizing 
Japan as one of the most reliable security partners of the United 
States. 
 
US officials concerned, including Honda, regard the comfort women 
issue as an abuse of human rights of the victims of sexual slavery. 
 
 
TOKYO 00003511  008 OF 010 
 
 
Japan naturally wonders if the US Congress has the power to meddle 
in other country's affairs. But in the case of the United States, 
the Congress is not the only one that makes request to other 
countries regarding a set of "values." The US State Department 
annually produces a report on trafficking in persons in other 
counties. This year, Japan was categorized as not fulfilling the 
minimum standards. American people have a special sense of mission 
to protect and spread a set of values. This can explain why the US 
House adopted the comfort women resolution. 
 
Among US congressional members, the comfort women issue is referred 
to as a "boutique issue," meaning it is not a national priority. 
That is evident in the lack of similar moves from the Senate that 
mainly discusses foreign affairs. 
 
With the House's adoption of the resolution, the focus has now 
shifted to Japan. Japan experts in the United States share the view 
that it is important for Japan to have a handle on the situation in 
the United States and abstain from overreacting to the adoption. 
Asked in the July 30 press conference, "What would you do if Japan 
did not offer an apology," Honda simply said: "I hope this will 
serve as a foundation for a new dialogue (between the United States 
and Japan)." 
 
Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Kurt Campbell, now 
drafting an Asia policy for the upcoming US presidential race, urged 
Abe and others to shift their stance on the historical issue. He 
said: "Even extremely pro-Japanese Americans are displeased with 
remarks by Prime Minister Abe and other cabinet ministers. It is 
more beneficial to spend time on present and future issues than to 
revise or correct interpretations of historical events." 
 
(6) Editorial: Comfort women resolution; Rectify factual errors 
through joint efforts between government and private sector 
 
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
August 1, 2007 
 
The full US House of Representatives approved a resolution calling 
for a formal apology from the Japanese government on the comfort 
women issue. Though the resolution is not legally binding, it is of 
concern that the Congress of the US, Japan's key ally, has adopted a 
resolution denouncing Japan. 
 
The Abe cabinet has taken a reasonable approach to this issue. Prime 
Minister Abe during the bilateral summit in late April expressed his 
deep sympathy with former comfort women, and President Bush highly 
evaluated his response. Japanese Ambassador to the US Ryozo Kato 
sent a letter to key members of the House stating that the adoption 
of a resolution denouncing Japan over the comfort women issue would 
harmfully affect Japan-US relations over the long term. The 
Democratic Party leadership in the House has reportedly put off the 
adoption of the resolution in the plenary session until after 
Japan's Upper House election, giving consideration to a possible 
impact of the adoption of such a resolution on Japan's political 
situation. Aside from the comfort women resolution, the House 
Foreign Affairs Committee has approved a resolution recognizing 
Japan's contribution to the anti-terrorist war. It can be said that 
this represents that Japan's diplomatic effort has made a certain 
degree of achievements. Even so, however, it was impossible to 
prevent the House from adopting the resolution in the plenary 
session. 
 
TOKYO 00003511  009 OF 010 
 
 
 
A resolution was added with words indicating that the "the Japan-US 
alliance is a linchpin in the Asian region"; and it is now at the 
stage of the approval at the House Foreign Affairs Committee. As a 
result, the wording of the adopted resolution was milder than that 
of the initial resolution introduced by Democrat Congressman Mike 
Honda. However, the resolution's basic errors have been kept intact, 
as can be seen in the fact that it categorically mentioned that the 
comfort women system was coercive prostitution for military 
personnel adopted by the Japanese government during WWII. 
 
It is true that the former comfort women experienced hardships 
during WWII and deserve sympathy. However, it was private brokers 
that mainly recruited them. The Japanese government did not 
coercively recruit them for sexual services. More than 200 official 
documents the Japanese government has collected over two years prove 
that. 
 
Concerning the comfort women resolution, Japanese experts, including 
journalist Yoshiko Sakurai, ran an opinion advertisement in a US 
daily in which they produced evidence to prove the actual situation 
of the comfort women. Some have criticized their action as having 
incurred a backlash from the US Congress. However, offering no 
rebuttal could mean in the international community acknowledging 
erroneous historical accounts. 
 
It was also revealed that an organization affiliated with China was 
pressurizing the House Foreign Affairs Committee chairman in the 
background. This organization has close ties with the Chinese 
government. It has criticized Japan on the wartime history issue. 
 
The government and the private sector need to make further efforts 
to rectify factual errors on the comfort-women issue. 
 
(7) Estimation of Lower House election, based on votes ruling and 
opposition parties gained in Upper House election 
 
NIKKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
July 31, 2007 
 
Close battle likely, if LDP, New Komeito cooperate; DPJ would win 
landslide victory, if LDP independently fights; Western Japan key to 
DPJ initiative to take over government reins 
 
Kyodo News Agency yesterday calculated a possible result of the next 
Lower House election, based on the number of votes each political 
party gained in the July 29 Upper House election, in which the 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) garnered 60 seats, 
depriving the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) of its status as the 
largest party in the chamber. According to a simple calculation, the 
DPJ would gain 350 seats among a total of 480 seats combining 300 
for single-seat constituencies and 180 for the proportional 
representation portion. 
 
It was only if the LDP and the New Komeito fully cooperated in 
single-seat constituencies, would they be able to gain 250 seats, 
including those in the proportional representation segment, enabling 
them to narrowly maintain their majority. If they fought 
independently, the DPJ would win a landslide victory in Hokkaido, 
Saitama, Tokyo, Aichi, Osaka, Hyogo and Fukuoka, where there are 
more than 10 single-seat constituencies. It would also win in 
Aomori, Tochigi, Gifu, Wakayama, Tottori and Kagawa, constituencies 
 
TOKYO 00003511  010 OF 010 
 
 
where it was defeated in the 2005 Lower House election, as well as 
in three seats out of four in Ehime, where it has never gained a 
seat before. The DPJ would gain 350 seats in total, combining 85 in 
the proportional representation segment. 
 
The LDP would win all seats in Gumma, Shimane and Yamaguchi, but 
suffer a setback in urban areas, only gaining two seats in Chiba and 
one in Kanagawa. It would gain no more than 85, combining 34 in 
single-seat constituencies and 55 in the proportional representation 
portion. 
 
However, if the LDP and the New Komeito cooperated, the situation 
would be completely different, indicating the reality that the New 
Komeito has the casting vote. The LDP and the New Komeito would 
secure all of 11 seats in Fukuoka in stark contrast to the case of 
the LDP independently running candidates in that region. The 
coalition would recover from the setback in all single 
seat-constituencies in the Upper House election this time, where the 
DPJ made a leap forward. The estimation is that it would be able to 
gain 165 seats in single-seat constituencies. 
 
For the estimation, votes each party gained in municipalities in the 
proportional representation segment in the Upper House election this 
time were tallied, based on single-seat constituencies and 
proportional representation blocs. 
 
Tabulations of the number of seats each party would gain in the 
Lower House election, based on the outcome in the Upper House 
proportional representation segment, highlighted the reality that 
the DPJ, which won most single-seat constituencies in the Upper 
House election this time, would fight an uphill battle in 
single-seat constituencies in western Japan. Provided that the LDP 
and the New Komeito fully cooperate for the Lower House election, 
the DPJ would be able to gain only five seats -- two in Hiroshima, 
one in Tokushima, Kochi and Nagasaki -- in 71 Lower House 
single-seat constituencies in the Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu 
regions, while the LDP and the New Komeito would gain 66. The result 
would be similar to that in the 2005 Lower House election, in which 
the LDP won a landslide victory, leaving the LDP with only seven 
seats in single-seat constituencies -- two in Okayama, and one in 
Tokushima, Fukuoka, Nagasaki, Kumamoto and Oita. The result reflects 
the ruling bloc's solid organizational power. 
 
SCHIEFFER