VZCZCXYZ0021
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHVI #0916/01 0951317
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 051317Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 6931
RUEKJCS/OSD WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/WHITEHOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY

UNCLAS VIENNA 000916 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EUR/AGS, INR/EU, AND EUR/PPD FOR YVETTE SAINT-ANDRE 
 
OSD FOR COMMANDER CHAFFEE 
 
WHITEHOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE 
 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC PAO AU
 
SUBJECT: AUSTRIAN MEDIA HIGHLIGHTS: April 05, 2007 
 
OeVP Disagrees on Same-Sex Partnerships 
 
¶1. An improvement of the legal rights of people living in same-sex 
partnerships in Austria could happen soon - provided the OeVP 
settles its intra-party disputes over the issue. OeVP secretary 
general Hannes Missethon suggested on ORF television yesterday that 
same-sex partnerships could in the future be registered with a 
notary public, but not at the registrar's office, as called for by 
the SPOe and the Greens. Nonetheless, the move would abolish 
discrimination, for example with regard to estate and inheritance 
rights, Missethon said. He was harshly criticized for his statements 
by other high-ranking OeVP members, according to Austrian media. 
Semi-official daily Wiener Zeitung notes that same-sex partnerships 
has been a particularly hot topic with the Conservatives. Following 
Missethon's announcement on ORF television yesterday that the OeVP 
was planning to offer Austrians the option of having both homosexual 
and heterosexual partnerships registered with a notary public, and 
the ensuing rebuke by party heavyweights, the OeVP Secretary General 
backpedaled, saying he had merely wanted to present the interim 
results of a perspectives group within the OeVP. Missethon's move 
came after Workers and Employees Union Secretary General Werner Amon 
harshly criticized his push towards equal rights for same-sex 
partnerships as "highly surprising." According to Amon, families 
needed to continue receiving highest priority, the Wiener Zeitung 
writes. 
 
 
Gusenbauer Visits Brussels 
 
¶2. Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer paid his first official visit to 
Brussels Wednesday, meeting with the new Austrian Ambassador to the 
EU, Hans-Dietmar Schweisgut, and with EU Commission President Jose 
Manual Barroso, with whom he discussed key issues from climate 
control to transit policy. He also called for a strengthening of the 
European social model. The Chancellor was met with praise for 
Austria's climate protection efforts and understanding for Austria's 
concerns regarding the university access of foreign students, but 
failed to get any actual EU promises regarding these matters, 
Austrian media say. 
Like all Austrian media, mass-circulation daily Kurier reports on 
Chancellor Alfred Gusenbauer's visit to Brussels. Following his 
meeting with Commission President Jos Manuel Barroso it was 
announced that EU Commission will take another close look at the 
information Austria has provided regarding its efforts to cut carbon 
dioxide emissions. On the issue of student quotas, Barroso was 
optimistic that a solution could be found which is in the interest 
of both sides. Gusenbauer meanwhile defended his stance that 
criticism of the Commission was sometimes necessary. Speaking at the 
Austrian Embassy in Brussels, he stressed that he was pushing for a 
"relaxed relationship," and that an exclusively "velvet glove 
approach" with the Commission would do no good. Nonetheless, the 
Kurier analyzes the Chancellor's Brussels trip stating that the 
Commission "showed understanding for Austria's university concerns 
and climate protection efforts, but is unlikely to depart from its 
principles." 
 
 
EU Opens Markets to Developing Regions 
 
¶3. The European Union Wednesday proposed to remove all remaining 
quota and tariff limitations on access to the EU market for all 
African, Caribbean and Pacific regions as part of the Economic 
Partnership Agreement negotiations, an Austrian daily says. 
Reporting on the EU's Economic Partnership Agreement negotiations, 
semi-official daily Wiener Zeitung says the offer covers all types 
of products, including agricultural goods like beef, dairy products 
and cereals, as well as all fruit and vegetables. It will apply 
immediately following the signing of an agreement including a 
phase-in period for rice and sugar. The only exception will be South 
Africa, where a number of globally competitive products will 
continue to pay import duties. The offer will give all African, 
Caribbean and Pacific countries the same full access to EU markets 
that all least developed countries have under the EU's "everything 
but arms" duty and quota-free market access system. It will apply in 
full from day one - planned for January 1, 2008 - with the exception 
of the  rice and sugar transition period. The daily notes this will 
be compatibile with EU market reforms and ensure stability to 
protect the interests of both the EU and ACP producers who supply 
those markets. Economic partnership agreements are the trade and 
development agreements the EU is currently negotiating in parallel 
with 6 African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) regions. These include 
the Caribbean; West Africa; East and Southern Africa; Central 
Africa; Southern Africa and the Pacific. The economic partnership 
agreements aim at integrating the ACP into the world trading economy 
and increasing the quantity and diversity of their trade. Under 
current arrangements, the 40 ACP least developed countries (LDCs) 
already have duty- and quota-free access to the EU, while 37 
non-LDCs have special tariff preferences and one country, South 
Africa, has a bilateral free trade agreement. A core objective of 
the EPAs is to bring each region under a single trade regime to 
encourage regional integration, the growth of markets and the 
creation of regional supply chains. 
 
 
Abu Amr in Vienna 
 
¶4. Palestinian Foreign Minister Ziad Abu Amr, after talks in Vienna 
with his Austrian counterpart Ursula Plassnik, said he doesn't 
believe Israel is serious about peace plan talks with the 
Palestinians. He said Israel needed to open the checkpoints and 
barriers that keep the citizens of around 2,000 Palestinian villages 
living in difficult circumstances. He also demanded Israel release 
about 10,000 Palestinians that it has imprisoned and suggested that 
then Israeli prisoners will be released, including Israeli soldier 
Gilad Shalit, kidnapped last summer. 
In an interview with semi-official daily Wiener Zeitung, Palestinian 
Foreign Minister Ziad Abu Amr outlines what he considers the next 
steps in the peace process: "We've done what we were asked to do: 
We've agreed on a moderate government program, and now, of course, 
we expect a change in the international community and EU's stance 
towards the Palestinians. It is time for things to get back to 
normal." Regarding Israel, Abu Amr emphasized that the "Palestinian 
Authority has recognized Israel, the PLO has recognized Israel. The 
government is only a small part of the Palestinian political system. 
We've drawn up a national unity platform and have met requirements. 
Why does everyone focus exclusively on the Palestinian side? There 
are parties in Israel that have neither recognized the Palestinian 
authority nor the Palestinian state." Peace, he believes, has been 
"outlined quite clearly in the Arab League initiative. There has to 
be a normalization of our relations (with other countries), and a 
recognition of the state (of Israel) in return for Israel's 
withdrawal behind the borders of 1967." 
 
Centrist daily Die Presse also publishes an interview with the 
Foreign Minister, quoting him as saying he has "no problem with 
Israel's right to exit, but we're not talking about personal views 
here. I represent a government that has committed itself to the 
exiting agreements of the Palestinian authority. This includes the 
letter in which the PLO recognized Israel. Without this recognition, 
the Palestinian authority could not have been founded. That is why 
the EU needs to lift its embargo against the Palestinian government, 
resume its direct financial aid payments, and give up its ban on 
contacts with Hamas members." 
 
 
15 British Sailors Return Home 
 
¶5. The 15 British Navy crew held captive by Iran for almost two 
weeks is on its way home. In a surprise move that Austrian media 
have described as a "huge PR stunt," Iranian President Mahmoud 
Ahmadinejad released the 15 yesterday in what he said was a "gift" 
to the British people. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has 
expressed his relief, and declared no deals had been made with Iran 
to secure the release of the soldiers. He did not thank or address 
the Iranian President, but stressed the UK bore the Iranian people 
"no ill will." 
All Austrian media give prominent coverage to the release of the 15 
British Navy personnel from Iranian custody. Independent provincial 
daily Salzburger Nachrichten comments on the "big show over 
prisoners, "and also quotes US President Bush as welcoming the 
developments. Centrist daily Die Presse in a front-page article 
notes that the change in the tug-of-war over the sailors was likely 
brought about by direct contact between Iran's chief negotiator Ali 
Larijani and Tony Blair's office. Allegedly, London agreed in a 
letter to respect the Iraqi-Iranian naval borders in the future, the 
Presse says. Iran's President Ahmadinejad has meanwhile also offered 
to resume diplomatic relations with the United States, provided "Mr. 
Bush and his administration change their behavior." The State 
Department replied, however, that it is Iran that needs to change, 
the daily notes. Mass-circulation daily Kurier like the majority of 
Austrian media emphasized the sensation caused by the Iranian 
decision, describing it s as "bombshell," and a "surprise PR coup" 
launched by the Iranian President, and ORF online news points out 
that Ahmadinejad clearly enjoyed the humiliation his surprise move 
must have caused London. 
And in liberal daily Der Standard, foreign affairs writer Martin 
Stricker comments on the "grande finale in Tehran," saying that both 
sides have finally "succeeded in attaining their goals:  The 
liberation of the British citizens without loss of face by the 
parties concerned. British Prime Minister Tony Blair did not have to 
apologize for his alleged violation of borders, nor did the regime 
in Teheran have to submit to ;pudmouthed threats. The risk of 
escalation seemed too great for either. For the rest of the world, 
this is very reassuring. Likewise encouraging is the prospect of old 
fronts buckling elsewhere in the region, and the possibility that 
the US could play a constructive role in this development - in the 
person of the Democratic Speaker of the House. Perhaps there will be 
change." 
 
 
 
 
Pelosi in Syria 
 
¶6. US Speaker of the House of Representatives Democrat Nancy Pelosi, 
after talks in Damascus, has said Syria is ready to resume peace 
talks with Israel. She explained she had delivered a similar message 
from Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert to Syria's President Bashar 
Al-Assad. US President Bush has accused Pelosi of damaging his 
administration's Middle East efforts and of sending "mixed messages" 
to Syria. An Austrian daily describes Pelosi's trip to the region as 
a "slap in the face" for President Bush. 
Liberal daily Der Standard writes that Nancy Pelosi's visit to Syria 
has been harshly criticized by the White House. Such visits and 
photo-ops were "counterproductive," and would merely affirm Assad's 
administrations in their belief that they were part of the 
established international community, President Bush argued. The 
daily's foreign affairs writer Christoph Winder argues that Pelosi's 
"signal to the American public is clear: The Democrats have lost 
patience with George W. Bush and as much as they can, they will not 
hesitate to take charge of the foreign policy agenda while he is 
still in office. Pelosi's conduct reflects the fundamentally changed 
distribution of power in US domestic policy. Bush and his party are 
in the political doldrums. More and more leading Republicans are 
distancing themselves from their President with growing speed." 
Independent provincial daily Salzburger Nachrichten suggests that 
President Bush was apparently "passed over" in Pelosi's decision to 
visit Syria. The images of her self-assured appearances and her 
meeting with Syrian President Assad must have been quite painful for 
the US President, the daily speculates, and adds that the trip and 
Pelosi's determination casts a critical light on President Bush's 
Mideast policy, which some US diplomats have admitted has reached a 
deadlock. The Democrat's visit with Assad also emphasized the US 
President's political solitude, the Salzburger Nachrichten believes, 
and quotes conservative columnist Bob Novak as commenting that "Bush 
is as isolated as Nixon was at the height of Watergate." The daily 
adds that Pelosi's trip has allegedly been welcomed by a number of 
high-ranking State Department and Pentagon officials, and it comes 
at a time when Bush's political allies in the Middle East have 
signaled that their increasing distance from the US President. 
 
 
Interview with David Frum 
 
¶7. In an interview with a leading Austrian daily, former Bush aide 
and presidential speech writer David Frum, the "man who co-authored 
the famous 'axis-of-evil' speech," as the daily puts it, discusses 
the United States' miscalculations and problems in Iraq, the Iran 
crisis and the legacy of US President Bush. 
Liberal daily Der Standard on April 4 published an interview with 
David Frum, former speech writer for President Bush. He emphasized 
that from his point of view, "the US was facing two major problems 
in Iraq: Because the President - and all of us - had been wrong 
about the weapons of mass destruction, we arrived in Iraq with very 
little credibility. The President honestly considered Iraq an 
immediate threat. He did not lie. Had he wanted to do so, he could 
have come up with at least 20 better lies than that one." If things 
in Iraq had gone better, "even without the WMD there would have been 
no questions. If the weapons had been there and the situation had 
turned out to be as difficult as it is, it would have been OK too." 
One problem the US encountered in Iraq, according to Frum, was that 
"all US plans were tailored towards taking over a functioning Iraqi 
state. We failed to see that Saddam Hussein's dictatorship had 
cannibalized itself in its final decade."  Nevertheless, he still 
believes it is "possible to create a functioning Iraqi state, which 
is capable of controlling its territory, fights terrorism and serves 
as an example of smoothly running institutions. Indeed, we do have 
those already: Iraq has the only free media in the Arab world, and 
it has an elected government. Many security problems remain, but 
these things are highly unusual in the Arab world." 
 
 
US Supreme Court Enforces Climate Protection 
 
¶8. ... reads the front-page headline of an Austrian daily on April 
¶4. The paper reports on the Supreme Court ruling that the Bush 
administration was wrong to say it did not have the power to 
regulate exhaust gases from new cars and trucks. According to the 
Court, the Environmental Protection Agency offered "no reasoned 
explanation" for refusing to regulate carbon dioxide and other 
harmful gas emissions from cars. 
In a front-page report April 4, independent provincial daily 
Salzburger Nachrichten says the Bush administration's environment 
and climate policy has received a "harsh rebuke" from the US Supreme 
Court. The Court criticized the administration's passive stance on 
climate protection, and demanded that the Environmental Protection 
Agency EPA issue binding emission limits for exhaust gases from new 
cars. Greenhouse gases must be rated as pollutants, and the "damage 
wrought by climate change is serious and generally known," the daily 
quotes from the ruling. California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger 
sees the Supreme Court decision as affirmation of his policy, the 
Salzburger Nachrichten says. "We hope the EPA will come to the same 
conclusion have in California. Greenhouse gases from motor vehicles 
must be reduced," Schwarzenegger underscored. 
The daily's foreign affairs writer Thomas Spang commented that the 
Supreme Court decision is "good news. Now that the EPA has been 
forced by law to cooperate, chances for excellent climate protection 
initiatives in (states like California) are not bad. EPA can no 
longer use threadbare arguments to stall on implementing severe 
measures against global warming. (...) What the decision means for 
the rest of the country remains to be seen. The Bush administration 
will certainly not be over-eager to implement the new provisions. It 
is now for Congress to increase the pressure on the government." 
Likewise, commentator for the daily Gerhard Schwischei argued that 
there is "cause for optimism now that the Supreme Court of the 
United States has taken a courageous step in making clear to the 
Bush administration that the refusal of the US environmental agency 
to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide 
(CO2) is no longer permissible and climate change is a real danger." 
 
McCaw