

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
Global
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06BEIRUT2223, MGLE01: HARIRI, HAMADEH DESCRIBE AS BOTH GOOD AND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06BEIRUT2223 | 2006-07-03 07:22 | 2011-08-30 01:44 | SECRET//NOFORN | Embassy Beirut |
VZCZCXRO7353
OO RUEHAG RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHKUK
DE RUEHLB #2223/01 1840722
ZNY SSSSS ZZH
O 030722Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY BEIRUT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 4406
INFO RUEHEE/ARAB LEAGUE COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
S E C R E T SECTION 01 OF 03 BEIRUT 002223
SIPDIS
NOFORN
SIPDIS
NSC FOR ABRAMS/DORAN/SINGH
E.O. 12958: DECL: 07/02/2026
TAGS: PREL PTER PGOV KISL LE SY IS KPAL KWBG
SUBJECT: MGLE01: HARIRI, HAMADEH DESCRIBE AS BOTH GOOD AND
BAD THE IMPACT OF ISRAEL'S GAZA OPERATION ON LEBANON'S
NATIONAL DIALOGUE
REF: A. BEIRUT 2222
¶B. BEIRUT 2221
Classified By: Jeffrey Feltman, Ambassador, per 1.4 (b) and (d).
SUMMARY
-------
¶1. (C/NF) In separate one-on-one meetings with the
Ambassador on 6/30, MP Sa'ad Hariri and Minister of
Telecommunications Marwan Hamadeh expressed basic
satisfaction with the previous day's national dialogue
session. Israel's actions in Gaza and the arrests of Hamas
cabinet members and lawmakers cast a heavy shadow over the
talks. With the Lebanese convinced that Israel's response to
the Shalit kidnapping was disproportionate, Hizballah had
fresh material to use in arguing that Israel will be forever
hostile. But Israel's actions also had a positive impact on
the dialogue, Hariri and Hamadeh argued, as the destruction
of Gaza's civilian infrastructure demonstrated the dangers of
Hizballah's tactics. Hamadeh claimed to have detected Syrian
and Iranian messages of constraint on Nasrallah, who vowed to
work to keep the Blue Line calm. Hariri, by contrast,
claimed credit for Nasrallah's promises of restraint.
Nasrallah also paid positive lip service to requests
regarding UNIFIL renewal. Regarding disarmament of the
Palestinian arms outside the camps, Hamadeh claimed that
Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri proved to be an unexpected
ally in thwarting Michel Aoun's attempt to blame the lack of
progress solely on Fouad Siniora's cabinet. End summary.
NASRALLAH PROFITS FROM PERCEPTION
OF ISRAELI DISPROPORTIONATE RESPONSE
------------------------------------
¶2. (C/NF) Hariri and Hamadeh's descriptions on 6/30 of the
previous day's national dialogue largely tracked those of
other Embassy contacts (reftels). They elaborated on the
impact of the Israeli responses to the Gaza kidnapping of
Cpl. Shalit. The dialogue atmosphere was initially quite
"heavy," Hamadeh said, with the Muslims in particular feeling
a sense of solidarity with the Palestinians. Hizballah
Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah profited from the Lebanese
SIPDIS
popular belief that Israel's destruction of Gaza
infrastructure and arrest of lawmakers and cabinet members
was disproportionate to the crime. Nasrallah "had the
perfect examples" to use, Hariri said, in arguing that Israel
was irrationally and eternally anti-Arab and not to be
trusted. All dialogue participants, Hamadeh argued, had to
demonstrate their outrage against Israeli action. Instead of
zeroing in on the problem of the "arms of the resistance,"
Hamadeh quipped, the dialogue focused too much on the "arms
of the aggression," because of the news and pictures out of
Gaza and the West Bank. "Of course we all had to say that
Israel was the enemy," Hariri said; "look what's going on!"
HAMAS' TACTICS MIRROR HIZBALLAH'S,
THUS LEBANON RISKS SAME ISRAELI RESPONSE
----------------------------------------
¶3. (C/NF) But there was also a positive impact on the
dialogue of the Israeli action, Hamadeh and Hariri noted.
Citing the news from Gaza, Walid Jumblatt argued forcefully
to Nasrallah that Lebanon must not be exposed again to
Israeli wrath. He and Boutros Harb took the lead in pushing
the dialogue participants to consider a recommitment to the
1949 armistice agreement, adjusted as necessary. Nasrallah
was on the defensive, Hamadeh argued, particularly when
Jumblatt pointedly reminded the dialogue participants that
what the Palestinians did to the Israelis -- infiltrate
Israeli-controlled territory and successfully kidnap an
Israeli soldier while killing others -- was exactly the m.o.
Hizballah has tried repeatedly. Thus Lebanon had to be
prepared to sacrifice its bridges, water lines, and
electricity plants, if Hizballah actually succeeded in
kidnapping an Israeli. Pressed by Jumblatt, Nasrallah
admitted that Hizballah's military installations along the
Blue Line had suffered extension damage by the 5/28 Israeli
raids.
NASRALLAH PROMISES TO TRY
TO KEEP BLUE LINE CALM
-------------------------
¶4. (C/NF) Nasrallah readily agreed to the request by some
BEIRUT 00002223 002 OF 003
participants that Hizballah not take any actions along the
Blue Line in response to the Gaza operation. Asking the
dialogue participants not to make any statements to this
effect lest people try to challenge his restraint, Nasrallah
said "leave it to me" to keep the situation in the south
calm. He also promised to use Hizballah's influence and
control to prevent any Palestinians from firing upon Isarel.
¶5. (C/NF) Both Hamadeh and Hariri believed that Nasrallah
was sincere in his commitment to try to keep the Blue Line
calm (although both worried that any Israeli "provocations"
might change Nasrallah's mind). But they differed on the
reasons behind Nasrallah's vows of restraint. Hamadeh
detected a Syrian and Iranian message to Nasrallah. "It
seems obvious" that neither Syria nor Iran want to escalate
the situation. Hamadeh said that, while the Israeli F-16
flights over Bashar al-Asad's summer residence did not
produce the release of Cpl. Shalit, they may have provoked
sufficient Syrian fears to keep Hizballah reined in. Hariri,
by contrast, credited the intermittent dialogue he has
conducted with Hizballah (although not lately with Nasrallah
himself) as the essential factor in what seems to be a
Hizballah decision to keep the Blue Line calm for now.
A "MODERATE" NASRALLAH ON UNIFIL
--------------------------------
¶6. (C/NF) In general, both Hamadeh and Hariri agreed,
Nasrallah came across as more moderate in this dialogue
session than he had previously. Asked for additional
examples of this moderation, Hamadeh said that Nasrallah had
responded more positively than expected regarding UNIFIL. PM
Siniora briefed the dialogue on UNIFIL's upcoming renewal,
noting that he had received a letter from UNIFIL Commander
Pellegrini regarding needed steps on the part of the GOL.
Siniora noted that he was also under increasing pressure from
the U.S., France, and others to show progress in asserting
GOL authority in the south. While admitting that Nasrallah's
real feelings might prove to be different when time for
implementation approaches, Hamadeh said that Nasrallah had
been "surprisingly positive" when Siniora said that it was
time that the Joint Security Forces (ISF and LAF combined)
for the south was up to its full complement of 1,000 troops.
Nasrallah said that he would help "facilitate" such
deployment. Nasrallah also did not reject Siniora's call for
a joint UNFIL-LAF planning unit, per the Pellegrini (and
UNSC) request.
PREVIOUS DIALOGUE DECISIONS,
AND PALESTINIAN ARMS
----------------------------
¶7. (C/NF) While General Aoun was mostly silent, when the
subject turned to the implementation of the dialogue's
previous decisions, he reportedly went on the attack ("that
man is 100 percent Syrian," Hariri said in exasperation):
Fouad Siniora's cabinet was a failure, responsible for the
lack of implementation. Siniora reviewed the dialogue's
decisions, noting that Syria had blocked the demarcation of
Sheba'a Farms and the establishment of bilateral diplomatic
relations. On the disarmament of the Palestinian arms
outside of the camps, Siniora said -- in a reference to
Hizballah -- that "those who promised to help, did not."
When Aoun protested and attacked Siniora again, Berri
intervened, describing it as "unrealistic" that the
government could shoulder the responsibility of Palestinian
disarmament alone. While Hariri and Hamadeh acknowledged
that the dialogue session did not make tangible progress on
Palestinian disarmament, Berri's statement made it very
difficult for Aoun to continue to claim that the cabinet
alone is to blame.
CONSENSUS ON AL-QAIDA AS THE ENEMY
----------------------------------
¶8. (C/NF) Hamadeh and Hariri shared the satisfaction that
there had been unanimity in the dialogue about the dangers
posed to Lebanon by al-Qaida. Al-Qaida is the "absolute
enemy," "murderers not Muslims," Hariri said (using much
stronger language than he had earlier in denouncing Israeli
action). In a swipe at recent Lebanese attempts to
liberalize some visa policies, Nasrallah said that there was
a danger that al-Qaida members would infiltrate Lebanon not
only by its land borders with Syria but also via the airport.
This comment, Hamadeh said, elicited protests from some
BEIRUT 00002223 003 OF 003
dialogue participants, who retorted to Nasrallah that he has
plenty of people at the airport who could prevent this.
FELTMAN