Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06TOKYO2130, METI VICE MINISTER EXPLAINS REGIONAL FTA PROPOSAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO2130.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06TOKYO2130 2006-04-19 06:24 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO7266
RR RUEHCHI RUEHFK RUEHHM RUEHKSO RUEHPB
DE RUEHKO #2130/01 1090624
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 190624Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1149
INFO RUEHZU/ASIAN PACIFIC ECONOMIC COOPERATION
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 7950
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 4895
RUEHPF/AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH 0567
RUEHGO/AMEMBASSY RANGOON 2074
RUEHVN/AMEMBASSY VIENTIANE 1475
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2816
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 TOKYO 002130 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT PASS USTR FOR CUTLER, NEUFFER, BEEMAN 
PARIS FOR USOECD 
GENEVA PASS USTR 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 04/19/2016 
TAGS: ECON ETRD PREL ASEAN APECO JA
SUBJECT: METI VICE MINISTER EXPLAINS REGIONAL FTA PROPOSAL 
 
REF: A. STATE 60291 
 
     B. STATE 60256 
 
Classified By: Joseph R. Donovan, Deputy Chief of Mission. 
Reason: 1.4 (b,d) 
 
1.  (C)  Summary:  Trade Minister Nikai's recent 
proposal for an East Asian free trade agreement (FTA) 
aims to balance a less-inclusive Chinese initiative, 
according to METI Vice Minister Kusaka.  The proposal 
would also help to "neutralize" pressures within the 
Japanese business community for a bilateral Japan- 
China agreement, he claimed.  Kusaka acknowledged that 
opposition to a bilateral U.S.-Japan FTA remained 
strong in both countries but suggested that an 
informal "Track 2" process be launched at the upcoming 
summit meeting.  He also indicated GOJ -- and notably 
METI -- support for U.S. nonproliferation goals with 
Iran, despite continued Japanese reliance on Iranian 
oil.  End summary. 
 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
East Asian FTA Proposal Aimed at Curbing Chinese 
Influence 
--------------------------------------------- --- 
 
2.  (C)  Ministry of Economy Trade and Industry (METI) 
Minister Nikai's proposed "Comprehensive Economic 
Partnership in East Asia" (CEPEA) centered on floating 
a counterproposal to increased integration among the 
members of ASEAN plus Three, according to METI Vice 
Minister Kazumasa Kusaka.  Meeting with Deputy Chief 
of Mission Donovan on April 18, Kusaka indicated that 
Japan had hoped that the Korean hosting of the Asia 
Pacific Economic Cooperation forum (APEC) in 2005 
along with the possible creation of a regional forum 
consisting of the United States, Japan, South Korea, 
China, Russia on such issues as energy and the 
environment might strengthen U.S. engagement in 
Northeast Asia.  Problems such as Japan's ban on the 
import of U.S. beef, however, had thwarted Japanese 
expectations of greater bilateral cooperation with the 
United States on "geo-economic" issues. 
 
3.  (C)  In the meantime, "continental" economic 
integration centered on China had continued, Kusaka 
stressed.  China's growing economic strength was 
exerting a kind of centripetal force drawing in the 
other regional economies, including Japan.  Japan was 
seeking to counterbalance this force through building 
up the trans-Pacific economic ties of the region.  It 
had also been successful in bringing Australia, New 
Zealand, and India into the East Asian Summit as a way 
to oppose Chinese dominance of that event. Japan, 
Kusaka noted, was interested in promoting only an East 
Asian community "with a small 'c'."  Although some had 
proposed following the European pattern of 
integration, that model could not work in East Asia, 
Kusaka said, because of the lack of shared political 
and economic values among the countries of East Asia. 
At best, the region could achieve greater economic 
integration -- a de facto phenomenon that was 
occurring even without government intervention. 
 
-------------------------------------------- 
APEC Broad but Not Deep; Alternatives Needed 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
4.  (C)  Although the United States played an 
important role in APEC and elsewhere as a "stabilizing 
force" in the region, APEC itself had failed to deepen 
economic cooperation among East Asian countries, 
Kusaka claimed.  The idea of an East Asian free trade 
agreement, however, put forward by former South Korean 
President Kim Dae Jung had had substantial resonance 
within the region and the support not only of the 
Koreans but of the Chinese as well.  Minister Nikai's 
proposal, however, aimed at slowing the FTA process 
among the ASEAN Plus Three members by introducing the 
other EAS countries:  Australia, New Zealand, and 
India.  With 16 countries involved, the negotiating 
 
TOKYO 00002130  002 OF 004 
 
 
process would necessarily be much slower than if the 
proposed agreement were limited to ASEAN Plus Three 
members alone, he maintained. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
"Neutralizing" Japanese Business Pressures on China 
--------------------------------------------- ------ 
 
5.  (C)  Kusaka also noted that Japanese business was 
pressuring METI to begin FTA negotiations with China. 
(Comment: We have not heard Japanese businesses tell 
us that they are pushing the GOJ for an FTA with 
China. End comment.)  The Japanese Business Federation 
(Keidanren) had proposed such an agreement to the 
government, with the focus to be less on tariffs and 
other "border issues" and more on internal factors 
such as investment and intellectual property 
protection.  METI, however, was endeavoring to resist 
the Keidanren proposal and instead wanted to base an 
agreement with China on its existing investment treaty 
with South Korea.  The Chinese, for their part, were 
uninterested because the Japanese proposal did not 
allow enough "policy space" to allow China's own 
industries to develop.  Nevertheless, METI hoped that 
the proposal of a three-way investment agreement with 
Korea and China along with Minister Nikai's CEPEA 
proposal would neutralize proponents of a bilateral 
economic agreement with China while creating a "bigger 
and more balanced" framework for regional integration. 
 
6.  (C)  Kusaka acknowledged that Nikai's proposal was 
not interagency-agreed Japanese Government policy 
although it had been briefed to other ministries both 
individually and at the Cabinet's Council on Economic 
and Fiscal Policy (CEFP).  (Note: This argument is 
somewhat disingenuous as key trade policy ministries 
like Agriculture, Health, Labor and Welfare, and 
Foreign Affairs are not members of the CEFP.  Moreover 
this "briefing" occurred after Minister Nikai's 
announcement.  End note.)  He added, however, that the 
Minister's initiative, in being made public, had 
already achieved much of its desired effect of putting 
forward an alternative to an FTA among ASEAN Plus 
Three members alone.  Kusaka believed that formal GOJ 
adoption of Nikai's proposal could even wait for a 
decision by Junichiro Koizumi's replacement as Prime 
Minister in September.  Under current circumstances, 
Nikai could still take his proposal to the meeting of 
ASEAN Plus Three economic ministers in August.  If 
accepted by the other ASEAN Plus Three ministers, 
Nikai's proposal would "broaden the base of the 
mountain" of achieving a regional FTA and "make the 
summit higher," thus necessitating a longer climb 
through a series of "base camps" -- i.e., bilateral 
FTAs -- along the way.  As a result, Japan would seek 
to finalize the bilateral agreements it currently has 
under negotiation before being drawn into a 
multilateral exercise tied to ASEAN Plus Three. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ----- 
Suggestion for "Track 2" FTA Discussions with U.S. 
--------------------------------------------- ----- 
 
7.  (C)  Kusaka expressed the view that Japan should 
find a way to restart its stalled FTA talks with South 
Korea, particularly now that the United States had 
announced the launch of  negotiations with the 
Koreans.  Once the United States and Japan had both 
come to agreement with Korea, the missing part of the 
"triangle" would obviously be a U.S.-Japan FTA, he 
noted.  Kusaka admitted, however, that a "Track I" 
initiative for an FTA between the United States and 
Japan would face opposition in both countries.  He 
suggested encouraging a more robust "Track II" process 
that could involve academic and private sector 
representatives and develop ideas for an eventual 
agreement.  In addition, the Australians, Kusaka said, 
were eager to begin FTA negotiations with Japan and 
had started a Track II process with Japan.  Progress 
in the Doha Development Agenda negotiations in the 
World Trade Organization would also lower the barriers 
 
TOKYO 00002130  003 OF 004 
 
 
to further trade liberalization in bilateral talks. 
 
8.  (C)  Kusaka suggested that in the meantime, 
however, the United States and Japan could further 
economic cooperation in areas such as harmonization of 
standards, particularly in politically influential 
industries such as pharmaceuticals.  This could not 
only spur more activity in areas such as research and 
development but also potentially build up 
constituencies in both countries for greater bilateral 
economic cooperation.  The summit meeting between 
Prime Minister Koizumi and President Bush, Kusaka 
indicated, might also endorse the "Track II" process 
toward an eventual FTA he had outlined.  It would then 
fall to the new Prime Minister to launch a new 
initiative with the United States, should he choose to 
do so.  Kusaka expressed disappointment, though, that 
U.S. insistence on resolution of the ban on imports of 
U.S. beef had slowed preparatory work on the economic 
content on the summit agenda. 
 
9.  (SBU)  The DCM responded to Kusaka's extended 
monologue with the points provided ref A expressing 
U.S. concerns regarding the development of East Asian 
regional architecture and the potential to undermine 
the primacy of APEC.  He stressed that the launch of 
U.S. FTA negotiations with Korea highlights the 
ongoing extent of American engagement in Asia.  Kusaka 
reiterated Japan's desire to strengthen trans-Pacific 
ties even as it sought to deepen regional integration 
in East Asia. 
 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
East China Sea:  China Uncharacteristically Reasonable 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
 
10.  (C)  Noting that China's "correction" of an 
announcement regarding demarcation of an area in the 
East China Sea where sea traffic had been prohibited 
appeared to have prevented a quarrel with Japan, the 
DCM asked for Kusaka's view of the current situation. 
(By amending the latitude from 27 degrees 7 minutes to 
29 degrees 7 minutes, the prohibited area was moved 
across the disputed boundary line into China's 
exclusive economic zone.)  Kusaka replied that this 
constructive decision was "quite un-Beijing like."  He 
credited China's desire to avoid generating a 
controversy on the eve of President Hu's visit to 
Washington for Beijing's "reasonable action." 
 
--------------------------------------------- 
Iran:  Japan Shares U.S. Goals Despite Energy 
Dependence 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
11.  (C)  Turning to the issue of Iran, the DCM 
stressed that Japan should use its strong commercial 
relationship with Iran to encourage Iranian 
cooperation with the international community regarding 
its nuclear program.  Even though Japan imports a 
substantial portion of its oil from Iran, that fact 
should not get in the way of the shared political 
objective of obtaining Iranian cooperation, Kusaka 
responded.  He acknowledged Japan's commercial ties 
with Iran and the leverage that relationship provided. 
He said that Japan was "very much committed" to the 
nonproliferation goal and would continue to send the 
appropriate message on cooperation to Iran "as a 
friend." 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
12.  (C)  Kusaka was obviously on the defensive 
regarding Minister Nikai's unexpected proposals, and 
his extended remarks suggested well less than full 
acceptance, at least on his part, of the Minister's 
trial balloon.  Kusaka has clearly received the U.S. 
message that Japan needs to consult in advance with 
the United State prior to launching major new trade 
 
TOKYO 00002130  004 OF 004 
 
 
policy initiatives and that Japan also needs to 
consider the impact on organizations like APEC.  His 
comments on Iran represent the strongest support we 
have heard regarding that country from METI, which has 
traditionally sought to safeguard Japan's economic 
interests despite security concerns. 
SCHIEFFER