Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06HALIFAX70, ENERGY: MOVING LABRADOR'S LOWER CHURCHILL PROJECT TO

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06HALIFAX70.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06HALIFAX70 2006-04-07 15:03 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Halifax
VZCZCXRO6201
RR RUEHGA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHHA #0070/01 0971503
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 071503Z APR 06
FM AMCONSUL HALIFAX
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0976
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0353
INFO RUEHHA/AMCONSUL HALIFAX 1039
RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 0010
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 HALIFAX 000070 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG PGOV CA
SUBJECT: ENERGY: MOVING LABRADOR'S LOWER CHURCHILL PROJECT TO 
REALITY 
 
HALIFAX 00000070  001.2 OF 003 
 
 
1.  SUMMARY:  Suitors have lined up for a chance to be part of 
the long-anticipated project to develop the hydroelectric 
resource of the Lower Churchill River in Newfoundland-Labrador. 
A tough but calculated business plan by Premier Danny Williams, 
coupled with new market dynamics, has economists and even the 
Premier's staunchest political foes predicting that it looks 
good for the multi-billion dollar project to proceed.  Estimated 
output from the facility could be enough to supply 1.4 million 
households in eastern North America.  However, until the 
provincial government decides on a specific marketing and 
transmission plan, just what portion of the output will be 
available for export to the United States will remain unknown. 
END SUMMARY 
 
2.  Danny Williams, the high profile premier of 
Newfoundland-Labrador, is once again at the forefront of another 
mega energy project: this time the decades-old dream of 
harnessing the hydroelectric potential of Labrador's Lower 
Churchill River (LCR).  Since his election as Premier in 2003 
Williams has developed a reputation as a bare-knuckled fighter 
for his province's economic well-being.  His zealous policy of 
controlling development of his province's resources while 
maximizing economic returns has seen him take on Ottawa and win 
big on oil and gas royalties.  However, his strong-arm tactics 
frustrated major oil companies in their negotiations with the 
Premier on a development deal for the province's fourth offshore 
project, Hebron, with the result that they walked away. Whether 
the Premier went too far in pushing the industry in the Hebron 
case remains to be seen.  However, when it comes to the LCR 
project, the Premier's hard-nosed business tactics are not 
dissuading some high level contenders from wanting to want to 
work with him in moving the LCR project from a dream to a 
reality. 
 
Project Specifics 
----------------- 
 
3. To quote the Newfoundland-Labrador government's promotional 
literature, the Lower Churchill River is a significant untapped 
long-term source of clean, renewable energy available for the 
North American electricity market.  Located 140 miles from the 
existing 5,428-megawatt generating facility at Churchill Falls, 
Labrador, the proposed project includes two potential sites.  A 
2,000 megawatt project at Gull Island has the potential to 
produce an average 11.9 terawatt-hours of energy annually.  An 
824-megawatt project at Muskrat Falls has the potential to 
produce an average 4.8 terawatt-hours per year.  Combined, the 
projects have the potential to produce sufficient energy to 
supply up to 1.4 million households annually. 
 
4. The cost of the project will depend on whether the Gull 
Island and Muskrat Falls sites are developed at the same time 
(the province's preference) and how each site is configured. 
Because of the varying development options, analysts are looking 
at a broad range of total costs, falling anywhere from $6 to $9 
billion.  Assuming the project goes ahead, the estimated 
start-up date would be 2015. 
 
Routing And Marketing Options: US Market Only One Option 
--------------------------------------------- ----------- 
 
5.  The provincial government is looking at two very different 
options for getting Lower Churchill's combined 2,800 megawatts 
of power to market.  Option number one is the so-called 
traditional route that would see LCR power wheeled through 
Quebec and then to energy markets in that province, Ontario and 
the United States.  Option number two is the Maritime route 
which would see the electricity moved across Labrador and then 
by underwater cable to Nova Scotia and New Brunswick and from 
there to the United States. Until those marketing options are 
settled, it is unclear just how much LCR power will be available 
for export to the United States. 
 
Getting the Project Moving: Past and Current Attempts 
--------------------------------------------- ---------- 
 
6.  The dream to see a second hydro project in Labrador has been 
around for over 30 years and the province's history books show 
several failed attempts to get the project off the ground. 
Recent attempts include those proposed by Premier Williams' 
immediate predecessors, Liberal Premiers Roger Grimes (2002) and 
Brian Tobin (1998).  As analysts have concluded, these previous 
deals were doomed to fail, principally, because they were too 
wrapped up in politics.  The general perception in the minds of 
the Newfoundland-Labrador electorate was that the premiers were 
too quick to sell off a valuable energy resource to the only 
suitor, Hydro-Quebec (HQ).  Also, HQ was portrayed as a bully, 
holding Newfoundland-Labrador ransom because it controlled the 
transmission lines that the LCR project would need.  To add to 
 
HALIFAX 00000070  002.2 OF 003 
 
 
the contentious atmosphere, the ghost of the existing Churchill 
Falls contract haunted any negotiations on the LCR project. 
Signed in the 1960s the Churchill Falls contract allows HQ to 
purchase the output from the 5,428-megawatt facility at cheap 
rates with no escalator clauses.  Several Newfoundland-Labrador 
premiers have tried to reopen the contract to no avail, which 
led them to insist on onerous conditions in a future LCR 
contract as a means of compensation for Churchill Falls. 
 
7.  Enter Danny Williams in 2003 who with his successful 
business background was quick to take a fresh look at the LCF 
project.  The result was a whole new strategy featuring a 
pragmatic, business approach, not politics or emotions.  The 
first notable change with the Williams' game plan was that the 
ghost of Churchill Falls would no longer have any influence.  As 
Williams told Newfoundlanders and Labradoreans, "just get it 
over it." Also different this time is the premier's decision to 
have the provincially-owned utility, Newfoundland-Labrador 
Hydro, not politicians, on the frontlines of the process. 
Furthermore, the premier made another business decision by 
calling in some high-priced help, hiring independent industry 
consultants to advise the new LCR team. 
 
8.  By far the most radical difference from previous attempts to 
get the project kick-started was the Premier's move to dispel 
the notion that LCR could only be developed by the direct 
participation of HQ.  Instead, the Premier embarked on an 
ambitious plan to see just who else might be interested in 
getting the project moving.  What followed was his release of a 
competitive, five-phase strategy aimed at finding the best 
entity to develop the project, with no preference to any one 
group that might have had a past interest in the project, i.e., 
HQ.  Phase one of the strategy was letting the world know about 
LCR and inviting expressions of interest. Phase two is the 
assessment of the different proposals.  Phase three, the 
negotiation of commercial principles with the selected entity; 
and phase four, detailed commercial negotiations. 
 
Where we are now - Assessing the Proposals 
------------------------------------------ 
 
9. In January 2005 the government launched Phase one by sending 
out individual invitations to private companies and government 
jurisdictions and by running ads in global business newspapers 
and magazines.  By March 31, 2005, 25 interested parties 
responded.  From that list, the LCR team found three development 
proposals to their liking and three financing options.  The 
review team is currently crunching the numbers and finishing the 
risk analysis for each.  Speculation is there will be a final 
cut by the last half of 2006. 
 
Who Made the Cut? 
---------------- 
 
10. The three development proponents under consideration are: 
 
a) Hydro Quebec/Ontario Energy Financing Company/SNC-Lavalin. 
Hydro Quebec is owned by the government of Quebec; Ontario 
Energy Financing Company is one of the five components 
established by the restructuring of the former Ontario Hydro; 
and SNC-Lavalin is a privately owned engineering and 
construction company. 
 
b) TransCanada Corporation, a publicly traded North American 
energy company, headquartered in Calgary. 
 
c) The Tshiaskueshish Group, a consortium comprised of 
Australian, Canadian and First Nation business interests in 
Labrador. 
 
The three financial proponents are: 
 
a) Cheung Kong Infrastructure Holdings Limited, a Hong Kong 
diversified infrastructure company. 
 
b) Borealis Infrastructure Management Inc. a subsidiary of the 
Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System, one of Canada's 
largest pension plans. 
 
c) Altius, a Newfoundland and Labrador based royalty and mineral 
exploration investment company focused on resource development 
in Newfoundland and Labrador. 
 
The Other Contender - The Newfoundland-Labrador Government 
--------------------------------------------- ------------- 
 
11. Consistent with his government's policy of maintaining 
control over the province's resources and maximizing economic 
returns, the Premier also has another option, going it alone. 
 
HALIFAX 00000070  003.2 OF 003 
 
 
The Premier's thinking is if the 25 interested parties who bid 
on the project believe they can develop it, there is no reason 
why the Newfoundland-Labrador government cannot do the same. 
With the money from the new offshore royalty agreement, the 
Premier believes this cash provides the province with the 
required leverage in dealing with any potential developers or 
financial partners in a Newfoundland-Labrador led project.  To 
let all the parties know that the Williams government is serious 
in its intent to be an equal contender, it formally applied to 
Hydro Quebec's transmission division for approval to wheel the 
LCR power through its transmission system.  The province has 
already made a refundable deposit of $17 million, which presents 
an estimate of one-month tariff for using HQ infrastructure 
through its Open Access Transmission Tariff.  At present, HQ is 
studying the application, but will have to come up with a 
response at some point. 
 
Comment:  Is It Really LCR's Day In The Sun? 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
12.  With a number of serious propositions on the table and a 
changed energy market which now favors new, clean power sources 
like the LCR, many economists, joined surprisingly enough by the 
Premier's political foes, believe it is time for LCR's day in 
the sun.  Moreover, the Premier's steadfast business approach 
should mean that the province can get the most realistic and 
cost-effective development plan possible.  While finding an 
interested party now appears likely, there are still several 
hurdles to overcome before the project can move ahead.  The 
premier has been very forthright in discussing what these are: 
environmental and aboriginal issues and equally important, 
national political considerations.  A specific issue will be to 
determine just what role the new Harper government may play in 
the project. 
 
13.  Considering the Premier's record of never shying away from 
a battle, he will be looking to Ottawa for such things as loan 
guarantees or other forms of financial involvement.  However, 
just how interested the Conservative government in Ottawa will 
be in helping to finance a project where the bulk of the power 
might leave the country, remains to be seen.  While these 
considerations will be complicating factors further down the 
road, for now the Premier and his LCR team are focused on the 
immediate task of reviewing the different proposals.  Once that 
is completed, then the next battle starts:  Premier Williams 
going head to head with a would-be developer in the commercial 
negotiations of Phase three.  Given his tenaciousness as a 
negotiator, our money is on Williams to take every possible 
nickel off the table.  END COMMENT 
HILL