Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
Global
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06KHARTOUM289, Sudan: Source of Fragility - USAID visit to
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06KHARTOUM289 | 2006-02-07 14:22 | 2011-08-30 01:44 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Khartoum |
VZCZCXRO8539
PP RUEHROV
DE RUEHKH #0289/01 0381422
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071422Z FEB 06
FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1322
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 KHARTOUM 000289
SIPDIS
AIDAC
SIPDIS
STATE FOR AF/SPG, PRM, AND ALSO PASS USAID/W
USAID FOR DCHA SUDAN TEAM, AF/EA, DCHA
NAIROBI FOR USAID/DCHA/OFDA, USAID/REDSO, AND FAS
USMISSION UN ROME
GENEVA FOR NKYLOH
NAIROBI FOR SFO
NSC FOR JMELINE, TSHORTLEY
USUN FOR TMALY
BRUSSELS FOR PLERNER
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PREF PGOV PHUM EAID SOCI SU
SUBJECT: Sudan: Source of Fragility - USAID visit to
Malakal
REF: (A) Khartoum 019141 (B) Khartoum 02138 (C) Khartoum
02140
-------
Summary
-------
¶1. From January 23 to 30, a USAID Bureau for Democracy,
Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance (USAID/DCHA) team
visited Malakal town, capital of Upper Nile State, and
the surrounding areas to discuss priority needs and plan
immediate activities that will promote stability. The
team traveled up the Nile River to meet the King of the
Shilluk community. Factors affecting stability include:
conflicts at both community and political levels over
Upper Nile's abundant resources; an uneasy political
setup led by a governor from the National Congress Party
(NCP); pervasiveness of small arms; large numbers of IDPs
and returnees without adequate services; and high
expectations of the peace process. USAID's Office of
Transition Initiatives (USAID/OTI) will return to Malakal
in early February to finalize plans for a series of
priority quick impact activities. This is the third in a
series of cables analyzing sources of instability in the
peace process and what actions can be taken through USAID
programming to mitigate the likelihood of instability.
Previous cables reported on Eastern Upper Nile, the Nuba
Mountains, and Abyei. End Summary.
----------
Background
----------
¶2. As part of a series of field visits to assess the
effectiveness of USAID/DCHA programming to support the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), address sources of
instability, and build local capacity, a USAID/DCHA team
visited Malakal and environs from January 23 to 30.
(Previous visits to Eastern Upper Nile, Nuba Mountains,
and Abyei, are reported in reftels a, b, and c). The
team visiting Malakal included OTI and Office of U.S.
Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA) staff from the DCHA
team in Nairobi, the FSN internally displaced person
(IDP) focal point from the USAID/Khartoum office, as well
a representative from OTI's implementing partner
Development Alternatives, Inc. (DAI).
--------------------------------------------- --------
Major Factors Affecting Stability in Upper Nile State
--------------------------------------------- --------
¶3. Upper Nile, due to its rich economic potential,
geographic location, and site as one of the major areas
for IDP returns, is highly vulnerable to instability. Key
factors are detailed as follows:
a. Resource/Economic Factors: Conflict recurs at both
community and political levels over Upper Nile's abundant
resources: water, pastures, fishing, petroleum, gum
Arabic, and the agricultural land in the north of the
state that has been allocated by the Government to
outsiders. The state has allocated monopoly control over
the sale of fish and gum Arabic to outsiders for tax
purposes to the detriment of local populations. The
abundant resources of the state are not used to develop
the state or benefit the people. Even if the political
factors are addressed by the CPA, the resource factors
remain and can re-ignite conflict.
b. Geographic Factors: Upper Nile State is a Government
of Southern Sudan (GoSS) state bordering the north, yet
tends to be more oriented to Khartoum than to Juba - with
mixed results. The river provides easy economic access
for people and goods, while the political orientation to
Khartoum does not lend itself easily to harmonizing with
the GOSS in Juba. Upper Nile's location on the border
with Ethiopia also makes for uneasy times - recently the
Ethiopian army crossed the border in pursuit of Oromo
opposition fighters in Maiwut.
c. Political Factors: Upper Nile is the only state in
KHARTOUM 00000289 002 OF 004
the south with a governor from the NCP. The three
separate systems of government that used to exist in the
state - GOS/NCP, Sudan People's Liberation Movement
(SPLM), and militia groups - are now combined into one
uneasy arrangement, with unhappy losers. There are 23
warlords in the state. Most have joined the SPLA, but
some did not, and things are not yet settled - some are
still switching sides. At this writing, the Joint
Integrated Units (JIU) under the CPA are not yet
finalized.
d. Proliferation of Small Arms: Besides the unsettled
armed groups, many civilians are armed and the
disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration program is
not scheduled to start until late 2006.
e. Unequal Distribution of Services: This is a frequent
cause of inter-community conflict, and a challenge for
humanitarians whose guiding philosophy is "do no harm."
f. Returnees: Many people displaced by conflict are
returning to and through the state, a destabilizing
factor that has not yet caused conflict but has the
potential to do so. Some areas where long-distance
returnees would settle are currently occupied by IDPs
displaced by local conflicts. Malakal town has many IDPs
from nearby villages burned during fighting in early
¶2004. Last rainy season, returnees slept everywhere in
town, including in shops. There is no program to assist
these people to return to their home areas, nor are the
rural areas adequately prepared with services.
g. Urban Issues: Malakal is overcrowded with IDPs,
returnees passing through, and with job seekers.
Services are inadequate - people defecate on the ground
and the old rainwater drainage system does not work.
This is a great public health hazard. The soil in
Malakal is a heavy clay soil that makes digging latrines
particularly challenging and expensive due to the linings
that must be constructed. During the rains, parts of the
town are flooded for weeks with a meter of water and
movement around the city is impossible by car. Water and
electricity do not reach all, and there are few
generators. High unemployment exists, although
USAID/OFDA's partner Adventist Development and Relief
Agency (ADRA) has launched a town clean-up campaign
designed to give hundreds of people cash-for-work
opportunities.
h. Poverty: People are suffering from hunger and lack of
services, making survival difficult. Combined with the
recent culture of violence, communities often rob their
neighbors.
i. Ignorance: People do not know their rights or
understand general developments and are easily
manipulated.
j. Unrealistically High Expectations: Those who fought
and suffered in this long war were told that there will
be a new government and economic system and many changes,
but no changes are yet visible. There are still few
services in the town, and no services at all in many
rural areas. This was understandable during the war, but
people now want to see changes. The delay in
implementing the CPA is troubling people.
--------------------------------------------- ---------
Programs to Address the Causes of Instability/Conflict
--------------------------------------------- ---------
¶4. USAID has a significant humanitarian program in Upper
Nile State through nine international non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) and several U.N. agencies. Four
NGOs provide primary health care services in the eastern
and central parts of the state as well as in Malakal
town. One NGO is drilling nearly 60 boreholes in several
counties. Three NGOs are improving food security through
agricultural, veterinary, and fishing programs. Two NGOs
are assisting IDPs to return and resettle in their home
areas - one focusing on returnees coming from the north
KHARTOUM 00000289 003 OF 004
to the south via the Nile river, and one focusing on
eastern Upper Nile. USAID's transition program has not
yet started in Upper Nile State, but will do so very
quickly with a focus on Malakal town.
¶5. NGOs, U.N. agencies, and government counterparts in
Malakal suggested the following areas of focus:
a. Addressing public health hazards in Malakal town
including improving the water system, repairing the town
drainage system, building household and public latrines,
and renovating the abattoir;
b. Addressing the needs of returnees by: helping IDPs in
town to resettle in their nearby villages and cultivate
their land; expanding basic services such as health,
education, and water in rural areas; linking rural
employment to rural infrastructure activities; and
improving the travel conditions of the returnees using
the Nile river corridor by providing basic health
services, clean water, and protection for unaccompanied
minors on barges;
c. Community mobilization for peace-building programs
through civil society and community-based organizations;
d. Improve public information such as radio, internet/e-
mail, and dissemination and discussions of the
Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA); and
e. Training town and county government officials.
------------------------
MEETING THE SHILLUK KING
------------------------
¶6. On January 24, the team traveled one hour by
motorboat up the Nile to Aleki, the home village of the
Shilluk King. This king descended from a line that
started in 1540, and is the strongest traditional leader
in Sudan with influence over a significant ethnic group.
The team presented the purpose of its trip to Malakal,
provided information on current USAID programs in Upper
Nile State, and sought the king's advice on priority
activities for USAID in the area.
a. The king launched immediately into his most urgent
concern. As he explained, some people from the Uliaya
tribe of South Kordofan that neighbors the Shilluk to the
northwest have recently settled on Shilluk land to
harvest gum Arabic, chasing away the local inhabitants.
While there has not yet been fighting, many weapons are
present in the area and conflict could result if the
dispute remains unsettled. In the king's view, this
action violates the CPA and he asked that a land tenure
team come and investigate before conflict erupts. He
opined that outsiders or private companies are free to
come to the area and negotiate fairly with the owners of
the land to harvest the gum, but it cannot be done by
force in the New Sudan. He further stated that the state
government was behind this illegal land grab to benefit
from taxes.
b. The king said that Shilluk returnees do not need much
help to re-integrate into their communities. The key
factor discouraging returns is that services are better
where they are in areas of displacement, especially
schools and health clinics. He offered his help in
working with international organizations to advise them
were to build schools and clinics in villages, and in
mobilizing communities to work with organizations.
c. The king showed the team an impressive four-room
school built, in addition to a clinic, with USD 20,000 he
received from the Government of Sudan. Both needed
further support - the school needs furniture,
blackboards, and materials; and the clinic needs general
renovation. USAID/OTI plans to do this in the coming
three months.
-------------------------------
KHARTOUM 00000289 004 OF 004
Returnees Along the Sobat River
-------------------------------
¶7. The USAID IDP focal point visited the villages of
Atar Ardeba and Atar Madrassa on the Sobat River and
found that a significant number of displaced persons have
arrived from the north and from the neighboring countries
of Uganda and Kenya. These returnees have managed to re-
settle fairly easily and are welcomed by local
communities. The returnees expressed disappointment
about the lack of schools, proper health structures, and
clean water. Residents of both villages collect all
drinking water directly from the river. Despite these
conditions, returnees expressed the intention to stay in
the villages and not lose hope that the GoSS and the
international community would eventually provide
services.
¶8. In Malakal town, the number of IDPs returning from the
north using the river corridor is increasing, especially
during the dry season that will end in March. USAID/OFDA
partner ADRA is managing a monitoring and tracking system
that has logged the return of 42,000 people from March
2005 to date. The U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees
(UNHCR), the U.N. organization mandated to provide
protection for IDPs, remains hesitant to support the way
station at Malakal because it is located next to an SPLA
military base. The U.N. Children's Fund (UNICEF) and
ADRA are providing shelter, clean water, and latrines for
the way station, which is ready for operation.
HUME