Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05QUEBEC46, QUEBEC IMMIGRATION POLICY AT A CROSSROADS?

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05QUEBEC46.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05QUEBEC46 2005-04-11 20:40 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Consulate Quebec
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 QUEBEC 000046 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL:  4/11/2015 
TAGS: SOCI SMIG PGOV PREL EFIN ECON CA MO AG TS
SUBJECT: QUEBEC IMMIGRATION POLICY AT A CROSSROADS? 
 
REF: A. 03 MONTREAL 453 
 
     B. 01 QUEBEC 111 
     C. 97 MONTREAL 1775 
     D. 94 MONTREAL 976 
 
CLASSIFIED BY: jstrudwick, conoff, Quebec City, State. 
REASON: 1.4 (d) 
 
1.(U) SUMMARY:  Quebec views its semi-autonomous immigration 
policy as a key instrument in maintaining its economy and in 
preserving its francophone identity.  But the province finds it 
hard to attract the kind of immigrants it wants and to retain 
those that it gets.  Over just the past six years the Maghreb 
has become the deepest pool for the emigrant francophones that 
Quebec has traditionally sought to attract.  But North Africans 
are prominent among the groups that have proven difficult to 
integrate into the Quebec labor market, and events since 9/11 
have posed added challenges to their social integration even in 
this highly tolerant society. 
 
2.(C) With Law 53, passed last summer, the Charest Government 
ostensibly broke over 15 years of bipartisan immigration policy 
by enabling Quebec to use geographic origin as one of the 
criteria in selecting immigrants, and, if needed, to suspend the 
processing of applications.  Though never publicly stated, the 
measure was aimed primarily at the massive number of 
applications from Morocco and Algeria, which have created an 
enormous backlog and threaten to dominate future immigrant 
inflow. The opposition Parti Quebecois opposed Law 53 as 
discriminatory, and it is yet to be seen whether the Liberal 
Government will actually use the new tools it offers.  The 
immigration issue in Quebec is usually on the back-burner, but 
when brought forward it uncovers not political choices, but 
rather contradictions in the values held by society as a whole. 
End Summary. 
 
---------------------------- 
Finding Future Quebeckers 
---------------------------- 
3.(U) Immigration is one of the few areas under concurrent 
Federal and Provincial jurisdiction under the Constitution Act 
of 1867, but Quebec is the only province to have seriously 
developed its capacity to influence the size and composition of 
its immigrant flow.  The Federal Government sets national 
immigration objectives, establishes criteria for Family 
Unification immigrants and Refugees, handles admissions at 
Ports-of-Entry, and applies statutory immigrant visa criteria 
relating to criminality, security, and health.  Ottawa consults 
with the provinces on most immigration policy and enters into 
agreements with them.  But Ottawa's accord with Quebec is by far 
the most extensive.  Under its most recent iteration (1991) 
Quebec sets its own immigration levels, establishes the 
financial criteria for sponsors, and runs the settlement and 
integration programs (partially funded by Ottawa).  No immigrant 
can be settled in Quebec without a Quebec Certificate of 
Selection (CSQ). 
 
4.(U) Quebec's most important tool has been its role in 
selecting "independent immigrants."   Unlike Family Unification 
migrants and Refugees (which are the subject of ongoing 
Ottawa-Quebec negotiations to insure that these 
Federally-selected individuals can secure a CSQ), the selection 
of independent immigrants is a purely Quebec responsibility. 
These are the individuals that are the key to Quebec's 
immigration objectives.  Quebec wants to select them on the 
basis of their anticipated economic and social contribution and 
adaptability to the province.  And Quebec wants to increase both 
their numbers and their proportion of the province's total 
immigrant intake.  For much of the 1990s these independent 
immigrants made up only about 40% of the inflow; in recent years 
their share has been deliberately increased to around 60%.  The 
key tool in the screening/selection process is a qualifications 
assessment which awards a range of points for adaptability, 
experience (especially time already in Quebec), languages 
(especially French), age, spouse's characteristics, training, 
employment, and children.  While Quebec immigration officials 
technically can use their judgment, most of the points are 
determined by resumes and credentials. 
 
5.(U) There has been a consensus in Quebec on the need for 
immigration since the latter 1980s.  Despite continuance of a 
high unemployment rate that had hitherto tended to restrict 
immigration, it came to be recognized that the sharp fall in the 
birth rate since the 1960s poses significant problems for the 
province's economy and social systems, as well as for the 
survival of Quebec's distinct identity in a more populous Canada 
and North America.  Quebec also hoped that targeted immigration 
would increase the overall skills, education, and capital of its 
population.  In practice, it hasn't yet worked out that way. 
Quebec finds it hard to attract the kind of immigrants it wants 
and to retain those that it gets.  The GOQ prioritizes investors 
and entrepreneurs, but gets far fewer applications than it wants 
(only about 10% of annual intake).  Most immigrants are 
"workers" but Quebec finds itself capping its intake, because it 
does not want to admit more immigrants than it has employment 
vacancies.  Immigrants with university and professionals degrees 
(which are admitted as "workers") have met resistance from 
Quebec associations and employers, and there are also legitimate 
concerns about the value of some foreign diplomas. 
 
--------------------- 
Structural Conundrums 
--------------------- 
 
6.(U) Quebec's immigration ambitions are also afflicted by a 
number of vicious circles.  Immigration is often a spark to 
economic growth, but Quebec is economically less dynamic than 
some other provinces and consequently less attractive for 
Canada-bound migrants.  Like comparable regions in rust-belt 
America, Quebec has found few replacements for old manufacturing 
and raw material extraction industries.  Further, the province 
will soon be facing one of the more difficult demographic crises 
among Western societies, as its economically active population 
reaches retirement age, while the younger generations from four 
decades of low birth rates won't be numerous enough to pay the 
taxes and sustain consumption.  Immigration alone won't solve 
this problem, as Quebec would have to double its current annual 
intake (to 80,000) just to stabilize the population.  As 
Immigration Deputy Minister Raymonde Saint-Germain told us, 
Quebec's job market, housing stock, and social integration 
programs cannot handle that kind of volume even if the desired 
immigrants could be identified. 
 
7.(U) The importance of the French language also poses problems 
for Quebec's immigrant flow.  Over half of Quebec's immigrants 
are non-francophones in a province where French skills are vital 
to social integration and economic success.  This is especially 
true outside of the Montreal region where jobs are going 
unfilled.  Non-francophone immigrants also require significant 
public expenditures for language training and to provide family 
income while the training is going on.  Moreover, it is not 
unusual for non-francophone immigrants, after an initial year or 
so in Quebec, to move to an English-speaking province. 
Consequently, French skills are strongly weighted in the 
qualifications assessment, francophone applicant pools are 
attractive recruiting targets, and francophone applicants have a 
decided advantage. 
 
---------------------- 
Maghrebian Immigration 
---------------------- 
 
8.(U) For most of the 1990s, a stagnant economy, budget worries, 
and preoccupations about integration kept immigration levels 
flat.  But as the decade closed, things began to change, and in 
just the past few years immigration has sharply increased. 
 
(U) ANNUAL IMMIGRANTS TO QUEBEC (in thousands) 
1995    1996    1997    1998    1999    2000 
27.2    29.8    27.7    26.5    29.2    32.5 
 
2001    2002    2003    2004*   2005* 
37.5    36.6    40.4    43.5    46.5    *estimates 
 
9.(C) The intensification of civil conflict in Algeria in the 
late-1990s led to an increasing exodus of its more skilled and 
educated population.  Word of the Quebec option spread, both 
among private individuals as well as lawyers and immigration 
agents.  International social and economic conditions being what 
they are, the francophone populations of Morocco, Algeria, and 
Tunisia became the most fertile ground for would-be immigrants 
to Quebec.  Unlike francophone black Africans (who could not 
always meet the skills qualifications) and francophone Europeans 
(few of whom wished to emigrate), there are significant numbers 
of Maghrebians who can score selection points for language, 
skills, education, children, and who also are seeking a new 
place to live.  Applications increased sharply after 1999, and 
by 2003 over 70% of them were coming from North Africa, a volume 
which exceeded the overall Quebec immigration target. 
 
10.(C) Civil servants who received these applications noted the 
growth of the Maghrebian share of applicants.  They also were 
aware of significantly higher rates of unemployment and welfare 
support among Maghrebians (and black Africans), and found that 
in many cases, these applicants' French skills and school 
diplomas were over-rated.  The Maghrebian increases also raised 
the prospect that their large families would likely come to 
dominate the future flow of Family Unification immigrants (about 
20-25% of the total Quebec intake). Finally, after 9/11, 
security concerns made immigration officials more cautious in 
approving applications from the Islamic world.  To balance this 
flow, the Ministry stepped up recruitment efforts in Eastern 
Europe, East Asia, and, especially, Latin America, whose kindred 
languages promised more successful Francisation among a skilled 
immigrant pool, but modest success in these regions was dwarfed 
by the flood of applications from North Africa. 
 
11.(C) In 2002, the Immigration Ministry moved the processing of 
Maghrebian applications (including the large number of pending 
files) from Paris to Montreal.  Soon after the election of the 
Charest Government in April 2003, press reports began noting the 
slow processing times.  And by the end of the year the Ministry 
faced a scandal when it was revealed that it had been processing 
approximately the same number of applications for each of the 
four major regions: Africa, Europe, Latin America, East Asia. 
The result was an enormous backlog of Maghrebians while the 
other queues were cleared. 
 
------------------ 
Immigration Reform 
------------------ 
 
12.(C) In 2004 the PLQ government sought to tackle the 
immigration challenge head-on with a new Action Plan for 
2005-2007 and new legislation, Law 53.  The Action Plan stressed 
the challenge of rapidly and successfully integrating needed 
immigrants, and proposed a broad range of measures aimed to 
address those problems.  More succinctly, but no less directly, 
the Plan highlighted equity, integrity, efficiency, and 
transparency in processing, and the need to maintain diversity 
in the immigration inflow.  Law 53 itself was a brief, 
eight-page document consisting of short passages modifying 
existing legislation.  It reinforced the penalties for false 
documents, and gave the government powers to recognize and 
supervise immigration consultants.  But the heart of Law 53 were 
its provisions to allow the government to do legally what it had 
been trying to do informally over the previous few years: 
suspend processing of pending immigration applications and set 
immigration targets according to geographic areas.  Quebec, in 
effect, gave itself the tools to establish a quota (though the 
word is never used) for the Maghreb, and to channel its torrent 
of applications into a reservoir that might never be fully 
drained. 
 
13.(C) Law 53 was promptly decried by both immigrant-rights 
groups and the opposition Parti Quebecois.  Both attacked the 
law as discriminatory, and the PQ demanded to know how the 
immigration levels would be set and divided.  But the law passed 
and the only question now is whether the Charest government will 
use the new tools provided by Law 53 to reduce the flow of 
immigration from the Maghreb. In October, the Under-Secretary 
for Immigration and her team went off to Morocco for ten days to 
assuage concerns and explain criteria and procedures. In a 
January conversation, then-Minister Courchene told us that she 
wanted to clear the backlog and increase the number of 
immigrants.  And in a recent conversation with the CG, Deputy 
Minister Saint-Germain said that the GOQ will have to implement 
a processing schedule that is more transparent and predictable 
for the (fees-paying) applicant. 
 
14.(C) At this point, neither privately nor publicly is there 
talk of suspending processing.  The 2005 Immigration Plan, the 
first promulgated under Law 53 indicating geographic targets, 
anticipates no major change in the distribution of immigrants 
admitted.  Indeed, it projects a rise in Maghrebians selected: 
28% of the total, as compared with 18% in preceding years. 
(Given the backlog, even 28% is but a small percentage of 
applicants from that region. Media reports in mid-2004 indicated 
some 20,000 pending dossiers, the vast majority from 
Maghrebians.)  The Plan numbers suggest that the GOQ recognizes 
it will have to proceed slowly and carefully in implementing its 
new quota system.  And there is no sign of a decline of interest 
from North Africa. 
 
 
(U) GEOGRAPHIC ORIGIN OF IMMIGRANTS 
(as percentages of Total Admitted) 
 
        '99     '00     '01     '02     '03*    '05* 
 
America, Cent & South   13      13      15      15      18      12 
Europe, N/W/S   17      16      13      11      11      16 
Europe, East    9       8       9       14      12      14 
Asia, East & SE 18      16      17      13      14      13 
Asia, South     11      11      9       9       7 
Africa, North   14      16      20      20      18      28 
Africa, Other   8       8       7       7       7       1 
Middle East     5       5       5       5       7       6 
 
Total Immigration (,000)        29      32      38      38      40 
 37 
 
*2003 figures are estimates, 2005 figures are Selection Targets 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
15.(C) As in many Western societies, the immigration issue in 
Quebec is usually on the back-burner, but when brought forward 
it uncovers not political choices, but rather contradictions in 
the values held by society as a whole.  The GOQ historically, 
and the current PLQ government, has generally taken a firm line 
on social integration.  Three weeks ago, in a parliamentary 
forum (and in a subsequent letter to the press), International 
Affairs Minister (and one-time Immigration Minister) 
Gagnon-Tremblay noted the GOQ's opposition to the creation of 
Islamic family courts in Quebec, underlined the democratic and 
laic nature of Quebec society, and went on to remark that 
"immigrants who want to change our values can go elsewhere." 
But at the same time, Quebecers accept the need for immigration, 
recognize the difficulty in attracting immigrants, and place a 
high value on social tolerance.  Any measures that can be 
interpreted as racialist or profiling make prominent targets. 
After Gagnon-Tremblay's remarks, journalists promptly confronted 
newly-appointed Immigration Minister Lise Theriault, who 
reminded them of Quebec's (non-ideological) immigration 
selection criteria and rhetorically asked, "On what basis can 
one know if a candidate is a radical islamicist?"  A comparable 
situation exists on the security front.  While the GOQ publicly 
emphasizes that Federal (not provincial) officials are 
responsible for immigrant security checks, senior Quebec 
immigration officials told us that they quietly forward the 
dossiers of applicants with suspected terrorist or criminal ties 
to the RCMP or the provincial police. END COMMENT. 
 
 
 
 
 
FRIEDMAN