Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05CANBERRA386, AUSTRALIA'S FIFTH ANNUAL ANTI-TRAFFICKING IN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05CANBERRA386.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05CANBERRA386 2005-03-02 01:18 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Canberra
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

020118Z Mar 05
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 CANBERRA 000386 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 
 
DEPT FOR G/TIP, G, INL, DRL, PRM, IWI, EAP/RSP, AND 
EAP/ANP 
DEPT ALSO PASS TO USAID 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KCRM PHUM KWMN SMIG ELAB PREF KFRD ASEC AS
SUBJECT: AUSTRALIA'S FIFTH ANNUAL ANTI-TRAFFICKING IN 
PERSONS (TIP) REPORT 
 
REF:  A) 04 STATE 273089; B) 04 CANBERRA 702 
 
1. (SBU) SUMMARY:  Australia remains a destination country for 
Southeast Asian women trafficked for prostitution.  Many of these 
women travel to Australia voluntarily to work in both legal and 
illegal brothels but can be deceived or coerced into debt bondage 
or sexual servitude. 
 
The Government of Australia fully complies with the minimum 
standards for the elimination of trafficking.  Its Commonwealth 
Action Plan to Eradicate Trafficking in Persons, launched in 
October 2003, provides substantial financial and personnel 
resources to combat the problem both domestically and 
internationally.  The development of further legislation meant to 
comprehensively criminalize aspects of trafficking, increase 
prosecutions, and enhance victim assistance was among the many 
positive steps taken by the Australian Government in 2004. 
 
Prosecution 
The Government prosecutes trafficking offenses under various 
statutes including provisions in the Commonwealth Criminal Code, 
the Federal Crimes Act, and the Migration Act.  In the twelve 
months to December 31, 2004, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) 
received 44 referrals from government and non-government sources; 
38 of these cases were accepted for investigation during the year, 
while three were later rejected and one was terminated.  As of 
January 31, there were 14 suspected traffickers being tried in 
five cases involving 24 alleged trafficking victims.  The 
Australian Federal Police's 23-member Transnational Sexual 
Exploitation and Trafficking (TSET) rapid-response team is charged 
with making the initial assessment of whether a person is a 
trafficking victim.  The TSET is specifically dedicated to 
investigating cases throughout the country.  The AFP uses 
electronic surveillance, undercover operations, plea-bargaining 
and other enforcement techniques to investigate traffickers. 
 
In March 2005, the Parliament is expected to pass a new anti- 
trafficking law, which will comprehensively outlaw trafficking 
offenses and enable Australia to ratify later this year the UN 
Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons 
(SEPTEL by April 1). 
 
Under Australian law it is an offense for Australian citizens and 
residents to travel abroad to engage in sex with minors less than 
16 years of age.  Since its adoption in 1994, 13 persons have been 
convicted under this law, which carries a maximum sentence of 17 
years.  Penalties for other trafficking offenses are as high as 20 
to 25 years. 
 
Protection 
The Government took significant steps in 2004 to improve efforts 
by police and immigration authorities to distinguish trafficking 
victims from illegal migrants and to provide prompt assistance to 
those victims, including counseling and temporary shelter.  The 
Australian Government made determined efforts to identify and 
elicit the cooperation of trafficking victims in providing 
criminal evidence for the prosecution of traffickers.  The 
Government's streamlined police investigation and immigration 
referral procedures have seen immigration authorities dramatically 
increase the number of suspected trafficking victims it refers to 
the AFP for trafficking assessment and visa determinations. 
Immigration authorities have granted 29 bridging visas to 
trafficked victims.  Such cooperating victims are eligible for 
social security benefits, housing, medical checkups and treatment, 
legal assistance, social support and vocational training. 
Prevention 
The Government of Australia in 2004 continued to expand its 
efforts to prevent new incidents of trafficking, largely through 
closer coordination with neighboring countries to prevent and 
investigate trafficking.  During 2004 Australia increased its aid 
commitment to the International Organization of Migration (IOM) to 
help finance a project for the return and reintegration of 
trafficked and other vulnerable persons in the region.  The 
Government also funded awareness campaigns in source countries, in 
addition to programs designed to sensitize the tourism industry to 
the child sex tourism problem.  Australia has worked to raise the 
profile of trafficking issues in the region through its leadership 
role in the Bali Process on People Smuggling, Trafficking in 
Persons, and Related Transnational Crime.  Within Australia, the 
Government started an awareness campaign targeting the sex 
industry and the community at large; it also widely publicizes 
criminal cases against traffickers.  Australia sought the 
cooperation of foreign governments in the local prosecution of 
Australian pedophiles or their extradition or deportation to 
Australia to face justice for the extra-territorial offense of 
sexual exploitation of a minor. 
 
The Australian Government has continued to demonstrate regional 
leadership in combating trafficking in persons.  It has provided 
foreign aid to strengthen the capacity of regional police forces 
to investigate trafficking cases, supported legal education 
programs to assist regional lawmakers in improving their capacity 
to prosecute traffickers, and funded reintegration programs for 
trafficked women.  Australia also promoted awareness of the 
region's TIP problem by co-hosting with Indonesia the regional 
Bali conference. END SUMMARY. 
 
2. (U) Per reftel, Para 5 begins Mission Australia's submission to 
the fourth annual Anti-Trafficking In Persons (TIP) Report. 
 
3. (U) Embassy's point of contact on TIP issues is Labor 
Specialist Justin McEvoy, Ph: 61-2-6214-5865, Fax: 61-2-6214-5936, 
E-Mail: Mcevoyjp@state.gov.  FSO point of contact is Brett Mattei, 
Ph: 61-2-6214-5883, Fax: 61-2-6214-5816, E-Mail: 
MatteiBD@state.gov. 
 
4. (U) Per reftel request, Mission Australia has spent a total of 
419 work hours researching trafficking issues and meeting with 
trafficking contacts over the past year in preparation for this 
TIP report.  This total includes the following hours: 
 
20 hours at the MC level 
5 hours at the OC level 
40 hours spent by one officer at the 01 level 
96 hours spent by one officer at the 02 level 
20 hours spent by one officer at the 04 level 
and 240 hours spent by one FSN at the FSN-11 level 
 
5. (SBU) PART 1: OVERVIEW 
 
Australia remains a destination country for an indeterminate 
number of women, overwhelmingly from Thailand, trafficked for 
sexual servitude. 
 
Estimates of Australia's trafficking problem continue to vary 
considerably, ranging from 20 to over 1,000 sex trafficking 
victims per year.  Government officials insist that the size of 
Australia's trafficking problem (incorporating cases of slavery, 
sexual servitude, and deceptive recruiting to sexual servitude) 
continues to fall well below the TIP report's threshold of 100 
cases.  After 34 full investigations, the Australian Federal 
Police (AFP) determined that there were 20 trafficking victims 
during 2004.  Over the same period, the Department of Immigration 
and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (DIMIA) referred 99 
persons to the AFP for evaluation as suspected trafficking victims 
and subsequently issued 29 visas to women after the police secured 
the women's agreement to assist with prosecutions.  As of January 
31, 2005 the government was prosecuting 14 traffickers in five 
court cases involving 24 alleged trafficking victims.  In 2003, 
the Australian Crime Commission (ACC) undertook a criminal 
intelligence assessment of slavery and sexual servitude cases in 
Australia from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2003 (Ref B); of the five 
methods it used to estimate the scope of the problem, it found 
that the annual number of victims may be "as high as nearly 180" 
after accounting for underreporting. 
 
During 2004, the local anti-trafficking NGO Project Respect (PR) 
again stated that 1,000 trafficked victims are brought to 
Australia each year; however, this estimate is unreliable and 
uncorroborated, and it was not derived via a social science 
methodology.  [PR's methodology is discussed in detail below.] 
The 2003-04 parliamentary inquiry into the Government's response 
to sex trafficking was unable to settle on the scope of the 
problem; however, it determined that a "relatively small" number 
among an estimated 300 foreign women who travel to Australia for 
legal and illegal sex work each year were subjected to sexual 
servitude. 
 
Local NGO Child Wise, formerly End Child Prostitution and 
Trafficking Australia, reported no cases of foreign children being 
trafficked to Australia or child prostitutes being transported 
across state borders in 2004.  Child Wise alleged an increase in 
the pimp-controlled prostitution of Australians less than 18 years 
of age, but would not offer an estimate on the scope of the 
problem.  In November, a former New South Wales (NSW) brothel 
owner was sentenced to four years imprisonment for employing two 
Australian girls, aged 13 and 14. 
 
Australia's umbrella labor organization, the Australian Council of 
Trade Unions (ACTU), actively monitors suspected labor trafficking 
cases through their national network of affiliated unions.  The 
ACTU reported no cases of labor exploitation akin to trafficking. 
 
While trafficked women come overwhelmingly from Thailand, 
Australian authorities have located suspected trafficking victims 
from the Philippines, Taiwan, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, China, 
Hong Kong SAR, South Korea, Burma, the Congo, Sierra Leone, 
Colombia, and Uzbekistan.  Twenty-three of the 29 bridging visas 
DIMIA granted in 2004 went to Thai women.  Post found no evidence 
of persons being trafficked from Australia. 
 
Authorities believe that Australian trafficking networks are 
primarily composed of individual operators or opportunistic crime 
groups that take advantage of existing organized crime structures 
overseas to procure fraudulent but high-quality travel documents 
for the women. 
 
An NGO promoting sexual health, including among prostitutes, 
reported that increased immigration compliance raids of brothels 
since 2002 had reduced the number of foreign contract sex workers, 
the group considered most at risk of being trafficked; however, 
post could not substantiate this claim.  The NGO also reported 
that the debt holders had loosened the restrictions the women 
faced, but had increased the contract debt.  The AFP and the 
government-contracted Victims of Trafficking Care (VOTCare) 
program manager, Southern Edge Training (SET), independently 
confirmed these claims.  The AFP reported that the women were now 
encumbered with a larger debt averaging $46,800 (A60,000).  SET 
reported that the women were now receiving a partial payment for 
their work, rather than not receiving any payment before the 
"contract debt" was paid off. 
 
According to SET, the women were required to perform approximately 
14 client services per day, equivalent to 7 hours work, and 
complained about the pressure they felt having to accept clients 
that they did not want to service.  However, evidence contained in 
Project Respect's March 2004 report into sex trafficking in 
Australia cited cases where an alleged trafficked victim saw as 
few as two clients per day.  SET also reported that generally 
other people still "looked after" the women's passports, while the 
sexual health promotion NGO said that the confiscation of 
passports had become less prevalent.  The AFP reported that 
Thailand continued to be the primary source country of the foreign 
sex workers on debt contracts; however, they had found increasing 
numbers of South Korean women in Sydney, Melbourne and Brisbane's 
karaoke clubs and massage parlors, and that the Korean women were 
less willing to talk about their experiences.  The AFP further 
reported that Korean and Thai women faced different debt 
contracts, because many Korean women could more easily enter and 
work in Australia while criminal organizations were required to 
facilitate the entry of most Thai women.  NGO Project Respect 
reported an increase in South Korean women, some of whom the NGO 
believed were entering Australia on student visas which allowed 
the visa holder to work lawfully for up to 20 hours per week. 
 
For many years, the domestic anti-trafficking NGO Project Respect 
has claimed that 1,000 victims are trafficked to Australia for 
prostitution each year.  The NGO came to this estimate by 
multiplying DIMIA's count of prostitutes expelled from Australia 
for immigration violations in a given year by 10.  In March 2004, 
PR released their report "One Victim of Trafficking is One Too 
Many: Counting the Human Cost of Trafficking," which was prepared 
with the assistance of the U.S.-based Shared Hope International. 
The PR report presented information on some 280 suspected 
trafficking victims collected over five years (on average, 57 
victims per year).  The report cited 58 specific cases (some 
involving multiple victims), but many of these cases were gleaned 
from second and third hand reporting.  PR's report contained 
several weaknesses, including the failure to define a trafficked 
victim and to ensure that cases were not double-counted.  SET, 
which has over five years experience training female prostitutes 
and prisoners in other forms of employment, dismissed PR's 
estimate of the problem as "unbelievable" and over 10 times higher 
than their data set would support. 
 
In 2003, the ACC together with other federal agencies compiled a 
classified criminological assessment on the nature and future of 
trafficking in persons to Australia for sexual exploitation.  The 
ACC's classified report was not released publicly; however, post 
received a close-hold (non-releasable SBU-equivalent) copy of the 
report's executive summary in April 2004 (Ref B).  The 
Commission's research identified 37 sexual servitude cases between 
July 2002 and June 2003, and estimated that the annual number of 
victims "may be as high as nearly 180" after accounting for 
underreporting. 
 
In June 2004, a federal parliamentary committee issued a report on 
its year-long inquiry into the national criminal intelligence 
agency's response to sex trafficking and the adequacy of federal 
anti-trafficking laws.  The report recommended that the Government 
broaden the criminal code to include non-sexual forms of 
compulsory labor in the definition of trafficking and hasten its 
ratification of the U.N.'s trafficking protocol.  The report noted 
wide variations in NGO estimates of the number of trafficked 
women; while it was unable to provide definitive numbers, the 
report estimated that a "relatively small" number among an 
estimated 300 women who travel to the country for work in the sex 
industry each year were subjected to sexual servitude.  In 
response to the report, the Government restated its commitment to 
eradicate sex trafficking and take action on the report's 
recommendations. 
 
Limited, mostly anecdotal evidence is available about the end- 
point working conditions for "contract sex workers" in Australia 
and the degree to which they are subjected to involuntary 
servitude.  NGO reports continue to generally substantiate 
Brockett and Murray's 1994 assessment of contract sex workers 
working conditions.  Their report noted: "Once in Sydney, the 
women might not make as much money as they expected, and may 
become entangled in further debts and extortion so that they have 
to keep working.  Occasionally, women are physically forced to 
keep working and have little freedom to move beyond the parlour 
setting on their own; or they are moved from parlour to parlour to 
maximise profitability.  When tickets and passports with visas are 
taken away they have no bargaining power." 
 
In 1996, DIMIA published its "Report into the Trafficking of Women 
into Australian Sex Industry," which recorded allegations of 
restrictions on liberty for undocumented workers in the sex 
industry and pressures on them to accept demands from clients to 
engage in unsafe sexual practices.  It noted that brothel owners 
often held their passports as security for the debt, and contract 
workers were unable to freely access or control the money they 
earned until they departed Australia at the end of their 
contracts.  However, a Sydney-based NGO promoting sexual health 
told us in 2002 that these reports exaggerated the extent of 
coercive behavior in the industry.  The NGO employs two bilingual 
outreach workers with sex work experience who visit brothels 
regularly to educate sex workers about sexual health and legal 
issues.  The NGO's director acknowledged that some women might 
have to work specific hours or perform a certain number of acts 
per week.  She said that some women might also be required to have 
"minders" when they go on an outing or shopping.  The NGO claimed 
that the women readily make themselves available outside normal 
working hours because the more they work, the faster their debt is 
reduced and the sooner they start earning money for themselves. 
During the past five years, the NGO had encountered ten women who 
complained about their treatment and sought assistance to exit 
their contracts. 
 
The Australian Government's October 2003 announcement of a $15 
million (A20 million) Commonwealth Action Plan to Eradicate 
Trafficking in Persons, with contributions from five GOA 
ministries, demonstrated the considerable political support that 
exists in Australia to combat trafficking in persons.  In addition 
to this financial commitment, spread over four years, the GOA has 
undertaken other measures to eradicate trafficking in persons for 
sexual servitude. 
 
Prevention 
As a destination country for smuggled and trafficked people, 
Australia has taken on a regional leadership role to eradicate the 
smuggling and trafficking of persons.  The Australian government 
continued to fund awareness campaigns in source countries, as well 
as programs designed to sensitize the tourism industry to the 
child sex tourism problem.  It has also worked to raise the 
profile of trafficking issues in the region through its leadership 
role in the Bali Process on People Smuggling, Trafficking in 
Persons, and Related Transnational Crime.  During 2004, Australia 
increased its aid commitment to the International Organization of 
Migration to help finance a project for the return and 
reintegration of trafficked and other vulnerable women and 
children in the region, and continued its overseas aid commitment 
to the Asian Regional Initiative Against Trafficking in Women and 
Children in the Mekong delta region.  Within Australia, the 
government initiated an awareness campaign targeting the sex 
industry and the community at large; it also widely publicized 
criminal cases against traffickers.  Australia sought the 
cooperation of foreign governments in the local prosecution of 
Australian pedophiles or their extradition or deportation to 
Australia so they could be tried for the extra-territorial offense 
of sexual exploitation of a minor. 
 
Prosecution 
The Government prosecutes trafficking offenses under various 
statutes, including provisions in the Commonwealth Criminal Code, 
the Federal Crimes Act, and the Migration Act.  In the twelve 
months to December 31, 2004, the Australian Federal Police (AFP) 
received 44 referrals from government and non-government sources; 
38 of these cases were accepted for investigation during the year, 
while three were later rejected and one was terminated.  As of 
January 31, there were 14 suspected traffickers facing justice in 
five cases involving 24 alleged trafficking victims.  The 
Australian Federal Police's 23-member Transnational Sexual 
Exploitation and Trafficking (TSET) rapid-response team is charged 
with making the initial assessment of whether a person is a 
trafficking victim.  The TSET is specifically dedicated to 
investigating cases throughout the country.  The AFP uses 
electronic surveillance, undercover operations, plea-bargaining 
and other enforcement techniques to investigate traffickers. 
 
In 2004, sexual servitude, slavery, people smuggling, and child 
sex tourism crimes were included as serious offenses in the 
Federal Proceeds of Crime Act of 2002, which allows for the 
forfeiture of assets of those found guilty. 
 
Protection 
The Australian Government took significant steps in 2004 to 
improve efforts by police and immigration authorities to 
distinguish trafficking victims from illegal migrants and provide 
prompt assistance to those victims, including counseling and 
temporary shelter.  The Government made determined efforts to 
identify and elicit the cooperation of trafficking victims in 
providing criminal evidence for the prosecution of traffickers. 
The Australian Government's streamlined police investigation and 
immigration referral procedures have seen immigration authorities 
dramatically increase the number of suspected trafficking victims 
it refers to the AFP for trafficking assessment and visa 
determinations.  Immigration authorities have granted 29 bridging 
visas to trafficked victims.  Cooperative victims are eligible for 
social security benefits, housing, medical checkups and treatment, 
legal assistance, social support and vocational training. 
 
There were no reports of federal or state officials who condone or 
were complicit in trafficking in persons in Australia. 
 
There were no limitations on the Government's ability to address 
Australia's trafficking problem. 
 
The Inter-departmental Committee (IDC) established by the 
Government to develop the $15 million (A20 million) Commonwealth 
Action Plan to Eradicate Trafficking in Persons continued to 
monitor its implementation and report on its achievements directly 
to the Government.  To date, the AFP and the Minister for Justice 
and Customs have publicized the arrests of ten people for sexual 
servitude offenses.  Each of the five ministers involved in the 
plan's development has publicized achievements in his or her areas 
of responsibility.  In addition, Australia's well-respected anti- 
trafficking NGOs, an aggressive free press, and active domestic 
human rights organizations have ensured that the plan's 
accomplishments and shortcomings are subjected to public scrutiny. 
The Government has promoted its regional anti-trafficking and anti- 
smuggling efforts through its co-hosting of the yearly Regional 
Conference on People Smuggling, Trafficking in Persons, and 
Related Transnational Crime, also known as the "Bali Conference." 
 
The six state and two territory governments regulate prostitution. 
The states and territories have adopted a range of approaches to 
the regulation of prostitution, including full prohibition, 
criminalization, decriminalization, and partial legalization.  The 
State of South Australia comprehensively criminalizes 
prostitution, including the act of prostitution.  Both Tasmanian 
and Western Australian (WA) law criminalizes activities 
surrounding prostitution; however, since 1975, the WA sex industry 
has operated with informal police acceptance underpinned by an 
unwritten containment policy.  Australia's most populous state, 
New South Wales, decriminalized prostitution, effectively 
transferring regulatory control of brothels and street 
prostitution to local planning authorities, in 1995.  The 
remaining states and territories - Victoria, Queensland, the 
Northern Territory (NT), and the Australian Capital Territory 
(ACT) - have all adopted various forms of partial legalization, 
which regulate some form of commercial business.  Victoria, 
Queensland and the ACT license brothels; the NT licenses escort 
agencies.  Apart from South Australia, women who engage in 
prostitution are generally not subjected to criminal penalty. 
Across all jurisdictions, the legal minimum age of a prostitute is 
18 years old. 
 
There were no reports of the practice of buying or selling child 
brides during the year. 
 
6. (SBU) PART 2: PREVENTION 
 
The Government has acknowledged that people trafficking occurs in 
Australia, although it believes that the scope of the problem is 
small.  The Australian Federal Police (AFP) confirmed the 
existence of 20 trafficking victims in 2004. 
 
The principal government agencies involved in Australia's anti- 
trafficking and victim support efforts are the Departments of the 
Attorney General, Foreign Affairs and Trade, Immigration and 
Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, Family and Community 
Services, and Justice and Customs.  The Attorney General's 
Department oversees the Government's interdepartmental committee 
on people trafficking.  Australia continued to demonstrate 
regional leadership in fighting people trafficking by co- 
sponsoring, with Indonesia, regional activities under the auspices 
of the annual "Bali Conference."  Immigration officials identify 
suspected trafficking victims in many industries through regular 
compliance and document checks of foreign workers in businesses 
susceptible to harboring trafficking victims.  The Government's 
specialist anti-trafficking unit, the AFP's TSET team, deploys a 
rapid response unit to situations where trafficking is suspected. 
TSET, rather than DIMIA immigration compliance officers, is 
 
SIPDIS 
responsible for determining whether a person is a trafficking 
victim. 
 
Several other government agencies are involved in Australia's 
coordinated campaign to eradicate people trafficking.  The AFP and 
the Director of Public Prosecutions, partner agencies of the 
Justice and Customs Department, cooperate on trafficking 
investigations and prosecutions.  The Foreign Affairs Department's 
partner agency, the Australian Agency for International 
Development (AusAID), works with South-East Asian partners to 
combat trafficking and child sex tourism and funds several aid 
programs that promote regional cooperation to combat trafficking. 
The Australian Crime Commission is responsible for the collection 
and analysis of future trends in crime, including organized crime 
in Australia.  The Australian Transactions Reports and Analysis 
Center (AUSTRAC) investigates monetary flows from Australia's sex 
industry. 
 
The Government set aside $460,000 (A630,000) for a multi-year 
community awareness project about trafficking.  The project has 
two separate programs:  the first targets awareness of sex 
trafficking among workers in the legal sex industry, while the 
second focuses on improving community awareness of the problem. 
The goals of both campaigns are to help identify suspected victims 
and traffickers and to improve reporting to the relevant 
authorities for further investigation.  The project also raises 
awareness about the range of victim support measures to encourage 
victims themselves to come forward.  The project was carefully 
designed in close consultation with the sex industry, outreach and 
advocacy organizations, service providers and professionals in the 
community health and welfare sector, and the media.  The strategy 
comprises four stages over four years at a total cost of $0.4 
million from the Government's overall $20 million package of anti- 
trafficking initiatives announced in 2003.  The tender process for 
stage one (exploratory and developmental research) is now under 
way.  The successful tenderer will be assisted by a specialist 
project advisory group and will be required to directly consult 
and liaise closely with key non-government organizations. 
 
Separately, immigration officials and the NGO Project Respect 
distributed information brochures, which were jointly drafted, to 
brothels, informing women about their rights, as well as the 
resources available to victims of trafficking.  The brochures were 
written in Indonesian, Chinese, and Thai, as well as English. 
 
The Australian Government funds trafficking prevention programs in 
source countries through its overseas aid agency, AusAID. 
Australia's principal anti-trafficking project is the three-year 
$6.2 million (A8.5 million) Asian Regional Cooperation to Prevent 
People Trafficking project, which has established specialist anti- 
trafficking law enforcement units and developed prosecutorial 
capabilities in Thailand, Laos, Burma and Cambodia.  AusAID has 
also funded the domestic NGO Child Wise (formerly End Child 
Prostitution in Asian Tourism) with a US$276,000 grant to educate 
Southeast Asian tourism industry staff about protecting children 
from sexual exploitation. 
 
The Government's national action plan on trafficking consulted 
widely with many of the same NGOs and academics who wrote 
submissions to the Parliamentary inquiry into Australia's handling 
of women trafficked into Sexual Servitude (the complete list of 
parties can be found at 
http://www.aph.gov.au/Senate/committee/acc_ct te/completed_inquirie 
s/2002-04/sexual_servitude/submissions/sublis t.htm.)  All elements 
of Australia's civil society have shown a strong interest in 
trafficking issues, particularly sex trafficking.  The GOA 
responds promptly to and investigates effectively any reports of 
trafficking from the country's aggressive and independent media 
and NGOs. 
 
Australia's border control agencies, DIMIA and the Australian 
Customs Service (ACS), have one of the world's most advanced 
border monitoring information systems, which tracks both ingoing 
and outgoing passenger movements.  Officials check the bona fides 
of all passengers entering Australia to detect illegal entrants 
and trafficked or smuggled persons.  Immigration officials monitor 
the number of in-country requests for asylum, and inspect legal 
and suspected illegal brothels regularly to identify suspected 
trafficking victims and their countries of origin as well as 
evidence of visa malfeasance.  If immigration officials detect any 
grounds for suspicion that a person may have been trafficked, they 
are obliged to refer the suspected victim immediately to the AFP. 
Law enforcement agencies respond rapidly to evidence of 
trafficking; the AFP's 23-member TSET Team is available to DIMIA 
at short notice to assess evidence that may point to a suspected 
trafficking victim.  The Government also conducts outreach 
programs to many of its regional neighbors to enhance border 
security, through the AFP's law enforcement development program 
and immigration cooperation. 
 
Australia has taken a whole-of-government approach to eradicating 
trafficking in persons.  In 2003, the Australian Government 
established an interdepartmental committee to develop the 
Government's Action Plan to Eradicate Trafficking in Persons, and 
this committee continues to coordinate the government's anti- 
trafficking efforts.  Police and government agencies have 
effective internal affairs units or inspectors general who 
investigate reports of improper behavior or malfeasance. 
 
Australia leads regional efforts to prevent, monitor, and control 
anti-trafficking efforts through its sponsorship and co-chairing 
of the Regional Ministerial Conference on People Smuggling, 
Trafficking in Persons and Transnational Crime, also known as the 
"Bali Conference." 
 
In 2003, the GOA launched its four-year $15 million (A$20 million) 
Government's Action Plan to Eradicate Trafficking in Persons for 
Sexual Exploitation (see 
http://www.ag.gov.au/agd/www/Agdhome.nsf/Page /RWPA835B403668897F6C 
A256EB0000F7264?OpenDocument.)  The plan has already significantly 
enhanced the detection, investigation, and prosecution of 
traffickers, and improved support services to victims. 
 
Australia's Ambassador for People Smuggling Issues within DFAT is 
responsible for promoting effective, practical international 
cooperation to combat trafficking in persons, particularly in the 
Asia-Pacific region. 
 
7. (SBU) PART 3: PROSECUTION 
 
Australia's laws adequately cover the full scope of trafficking 
offences.  The Federal Government's primary anti-trafficking law 
is the Slavery and Sexual Servitude Act of 1999.  It amended the 
Commonwealth Criminal Code to criminalize slavery, sexual 
servitude (including exercising control or direction over, or 
providing finance for, any act of slavery,) and deceptive 
recruiting for sexual services.  In 2002, the Government 
specifically criminalized the smuggling of a person into Australia 
with the intention of subjecting the smuggled person to sexual 
servitude, slavery, or forced labor.  The Government unveiled a 
new trafficking bill in mid-2004, which followed from the review 
it announced as part of the national action plan.  The new bill 
would create many new offences, including where the trafficker 
transports a victim using force, threats or deception (proposed 
maximum penalty: 12 years imprisonment), trafficking in children 
(proposed maximum penalty: 20 years imprisonment), domestic 
trafficking to ensure that every person in the chain of 
exploitation can be prosecuted for participating (proposed maximum 
penalty: 12 years imprisonment), and exploitative employment 
contracts or debt bondage (proposed maximum penalty: 12 years 
imprisonment).  Parliament is expected to enact the new law in 
March 2005. 
 
State and territory laws govern domestic crimes, such as internal 
trafficking.  The AFP reported that state anti-trafficking laws 
complement the Federal law.  Four of Australia's six states and 
two territories -- New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, 
Western Australia (2004), the Northern Territory, and the 
Australian Capital Territory -- have laws that specifically 
criminalize sexual servitude.  The other three states (Tasmania 
and Queensland) could prosecute internal trafficking cases under 
other laws covering unlawful confinement and compelling a person 
to engage in sexual behavior, or under Federal anti-trafficking 
laws by reference. 
 
Penalties for people trafficking are severe.  Under Federal law, 
slavery carries a maximum penalty of 25 years' imprisonment, 
sexual servitude attracts a maximum penalty of 15 years' 
imprisonment (19 years' imprisonment in the case of persons under 
18 years), and deceptive recruitment for sexual services carries a 
maximum penalty of seven years' imprisonment (9 years' 
imprisonment in the case of persons under 18 years).  People 
smuggling for the purposes of exploitation carries a maximum 
penalty of 20 years' imprisonment under Federal law. 
 
The maximum penalty for trafficking offenses is higher than the 
separate state and territory laws covering rape and sexual 
assault.  Rape (or crimes corresponding to the common law offense 
of rape) carry penalties ranging from 12 years to life under 
separate laws of Australian states and territories.  Sexual 
assault offenses carry penalties ranging from 7 to 21 years 
imprisonment.  Slavery and sexual servitude offenses are all 
characterized by the Federal Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 as serious 
offenses for which persons convicted can be required to forfeit 
all their property. 
 
During the 2004 calendar year, the AFP received 44 referrals from 
government and non-government sources; 38 of these cases were 
accepted for investigation, while three were later rejected and 
one was terminated.  As of January 31 2005, 14 persons were facing 
prosecution in five separate cases involving 24 alleged 
trafficking victims.  The courts had not yet issued any sentences. 
 
Australian authorities believe that trafficking networks are 
primarily composed of individual operators, or opportunistic crime 
groups that often rely on organized crime to procure fraudulent, 
but high-quality travel documents for trafficked persons. 
Researchers and NGO sources indicate that profits from the work of 
foreign contract prostitutes, some of whom may be trafficked, are 
split among a network of brokers who bring the contract sex 
workers to Australia, and the owners of brothels where they work. 
The same sources say that once a foreign contract sex worker has 
paid her debt, she generally gets to keep 60 percent of the 
subsequent revenue from her work until her contract period is 
finished, which is the revenue less the cost of food and lodgings. 
 
Government law enforcement agents actively investigate cases of 
suspected trafficking.  AFP officers use all law enforcement 
techniques at their disposal to combat trafficking, including 
electronic surveillance and telecommunication interception, 
undercover operations, and mitigated punishment or immunity for 
cooperating suspects. 
 
The AFP has trained twenty-five special TSET investigators in 
interviewing suspected trafficking victims.  DIMIA's compliance 
officer training program ensures that its enforcement agents 
identify possible signs of trafficking and automatically refer 
possible trafficking cases to the AFP TSET team for evaluation. 
Federal and state agencies involved in immigration matters are 
specially trained to recognize trafficking and elicit information 
from witnesses or illegal immigrants that might point to 
trafficking cases.  DIMIA has posted a Senior Compliance Officer 
in Thailand (under the government's national action plan) to work 
with local officials and NGOs on joint investigations of 
traffickers and trafficking syndicates.  Immigration officials at 
posts and special Airport Liaison Officers (ALOs) are trained to 
spot potential trafficking victims when they apply for visas or 
transit through international airports.  They also serve as 
primary contacts on immigration-related matters with foreign 
immigration and law enforcement agencies, foreign NGOs, and aid 
organizations.  The NGO Child Wise (formerly ECPAT), with 
government sponsorship, has developed posters and training 
programs for consular and immigration officers that emphasize 
indicators of child trafficking. 
 
The Federal Government has worked closely with its regional 
neighbors to prevent and investigate both people smuggling and 
trafficking.  These cooperative efforts include funding overseas 
immigration and police liaison officers, training foreign police 
in investigative techniques, and facilitating regional conferences 
to coordinates measures against people trafficking. 
 
Australia has bilateral extradition treaties with many countries 
that would enable it to extradite persons, including its own 
nationals, who have been charged with trafficking offences in 
other countries. 
 
The Government, at all levels, has zero tolerance for any 
involvement in or support for trafficking in persons or people 
smuggling.  Post unearthed no indications that any government 
officials were involved in trafficking on a local or institutional 
level. 
 
In 1994 Australia enacted the Child Sex Tourism Act, which made it 
an offense for Australian citizens and residents who travel 
overseas to engage in sexual activity with children under the age 
of 16 years.  It provides for a maximum sentence of 17 years' 
imprisonment upon conviction.  Since 1994, 19 persons have been 
charged under the act; as of December 10, there were 13 
convictions, 3 dismissals, and 3 ongoing cases. 
 
Although Australia has not yet ratified ILO Convention 182 on the 
Elimination Of The Worst Forms Of Child Labor, it complies with 
ILO 182 in practice and has declared its intention to ratify the 
treaty after its states amend their laws to bring them into 
compliance.  Australia has ratified ILO Conventions 29 and 105. 
Australia signed, but has yet to ratify, both the Optional 
Protocol to the child rights Convention on the Sale of Children, 
Child Prostitution, and Child Pornography, and the Protocol to 
Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons. 
 
8. (SBU) PART 4: PROTECTION 
 
Australia provides a comprehensive trafficking victim protection 
package that includes relief from deportation, a special 
trafficking victim visa regime, and a tailored social services 
case management program.  The Government's Victims of Trafficking 
Care (VOTCare) program has assisted 37 people since mid-2004.  In 
February 2005, 22 women were receiving program assistance. 
 
The Government's VOTCare package comprises two phases: 
 
Phase 1 extends for a maximum of 30 days and is triggered after 
the person has been assessed as being a victim or a suspected 
victim of trafficking offenses and of interest to the police for 
the investigation or prosecution of a trafficking offense.  The 
suspected victim is given a 30-day visa (the Bridging Visa, Type 
"F"), which, once granted, entitles them to access the victim 
support program.  The victim assistance package provides a 
flexible and tailored package of benefits through individual case 
management.  The benefits include immediate medical and 
pharmaceutical treatment and counseling, private short-term hotel 
accommodation and an ongoing food and living allowance, access to 
English language training, and up to three appointments with a 
legal practitioner. 
 
Inclusion in the second phase of the program depends on whether 
the AFP has established that the victim can and will assist in the 
prosecution of traffickers.  At that stage, the police ask DIMIA 
to grant the victim a Criminal Justice Stay visa and a different 
range of support measures come into effect.  As such, the victim 
support package is driven by the visa regime.  The victim can 
access a special government payment (approximately $10,000 
(A12,600) per year including rent assistance, which is set at the 
same level as the government-funded unemployment benefit), and 
continue to have no-cost access to medical, pharmaceutical, 
counseling and training assistance.  Women may work lawfully while 
under Phase 2 of the program.  A case manager assists victims in 
finding vocational training and AFP certified private 
accommodation. 
 
In 2004, Australia introduced a new witness protection 
(trafficking) visa.  This visa acknowledges the risks faced by 
victims and witnesses who assist in the investigation of 
trafficking offenders, and allows them to remain in Australia on a 
temporary or permanent basis.  The victim qualifies for this visa 
by providing substantial assistance in the prosecution of a case, 
regardless of whether a court case progresses.  No victims or 
witnesses have yet been granted a witness protection (trafficking) 
visa, as none of Australia's trafficking cases have been concluded 
in the courts. 
 
Following a national public tender process, the Government awarded 
the contract for providing case management victim support to a 
private company, Southern Edge Training (SET).  State and local 
governments fund NGOs that provide women's hostels and sexual 
health outreach services to prostitutes and refer workers to 
immigration and counseling services.  In addition, the 
Government's aid agency, AusAID, continues to fund NGOs through 
projects to assist victims in Southeast Asia, as noted above. 
 
For many years, the DIMIA and the AFP have had a formal agreement 
on the investigation and referral of suspected trafficking 
victims.  These arrangements were reviewed in 2003 and new 
arrangements, whereby DIMIA agreed to immediately refer every 
suspected trafficking victim to the AFP regardless of whether they 
detected elements of sexual servitude offences, started in January 
2004.  The new arrangements directly addressed NGO allegations 
that DIMIA had summarily deported trafficking victims. 
Immigration officers referred significantly more persons to the 
AFP under these new arrangements in 2004.  Between 1999 and 2004 
(inclusive), DIMIA referred 133 suspected trafficking victims to 
the AFP.  DIMIA referred 99 suspected victims to the AFP in the 
2004 calendar year.  After investigating the referred cases, the 
AFP's TSET determined that 20 of the persons referred by DMIA were 
indeed victims of trafficking in 2004. 
 
All persons who are in breach of Australia's immigration laws 
("unlawful non-citizens" or UNC) are subject to immediate 
detention by immigration officers.  DIMIA detains unlawful non- 
citizens who are suspected of being trafficking victims until the 
AFP can question them.  After the AFP has determined that the 
victim's case is genuine and the victim has agreed to cooperate 
with legal action against the trafficker, the AFP advises DIMIA to 
issue the victim a 30-day bridging visa.  After the visa has been 
issued, the victim is no longer detained.  Under the terms of the 
Government's trafficking victim protection program, the AFP must 
contact SET within one hour of the AFP requesting that DIMIA issue 
the victim a bridging visa, type "F", and the SET caseworker must 
be with the victim within 2 hours of being contacted.  DIMIA has 
issued 29 Bridging Visas since they were introduced on January 1, 
2004.  Of the 29 bridging visas issued in 2004, 23 were issued to 
Thai women. 
 
Trafficking victims are neither fined nor prosecuted for 
violations of migration laws. 
 
While a trafficking victim can file a civil suit and take legal 
action against traffickers (and can use public legal aid resources 
to do so), there is no recorded instance of victims pursuing legal 
redress against traffickers. 
 
The Government has developed a comprehensive, personalized case 
management program, which is drawn from a "victim-centered, 
empowerment approach."  Victims are provided with police-vetted 
hotel accommodation and intensive care during the first stage of 
the program, and later with police-vetted private accommodation 
that they can personalize and make their home.  A trafficking 
victim's immediate family members who are onshore are incorporated 
into all aspects of the program, including eligibility for visas. 
 
The Government provides regular, specialized training for law 
enforcement officials on the identification of trafficking victims 
and the government's comprehensive victim support program. 
 
In recent years, the NGO Project Respect has emerged as 
Australia's most prominent campaigner against trafficking. 
Project Respect undertakes advocacy work and public education 
programs, and collaborates closely with partners in trafficking 
"sending countries," particularly in the Asia-Pacific region.  PR 
also works closely and cooperatively with local city governments 
to identify and report suspected trafficking victims to the 
police.  PR was consulted in the development of the GOA 
Commonwealth Action Plan to Eradicate Trafficking in Persons. 
 
In Sydney and Melbourne there are other NGOs that have regular 
contact with Asian prostitutes, who may include trafficking 
victims.  State departments of health also provide free hospital- 
based sexual health clinics on a walk-in basis.  The clinics offer 
a range of sexual health services in foreign languages.  Their 
services are granted to everyone, without the need for the client 
to show evidence of residency rights.  There are also outreach 
services that work in cooperation with these clinics.  These 
services generally have a state or local focus and often receive 
state funding as part of the Government's public health program 
aimed at reducing the transmission of sexually transmitted 
infections.  Such NGOs employ bilingual workers to visit brothels, 
where they provide the workers with individualized education and 
counseling or provide off-site training on a range of subjects, 
including sexual health, immigration and taxation issues.  These 
services often have afforded NGO workers a freedom of entry into 
brothels that enables them to monitor the employment conditions of 
foreign sex workers.  They also maintain good working 
relationships with local government authorities and often work 
closely with state government officials on the development of 
occupational health and safety guidelines for brothels. 
 
STANTON