

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
Global
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 03TEGUCIGALPA2584, SELECTING CANDIDATE MODEL COUNTRIES ON WATER FOR
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
03TEGUCIGALPA2584 | 2003-11-04 13:12 | 2011-08-30 01:44 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tegucigalpa |
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TEGUCIGALPA 002584
SIPDIS
STATE FOR OES/PCI: PSAMSON
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: SENV ETRD ECON HO
SUBJECT: SELECTING CANDIDATE MODEL COUNTRIES ON WATER FOR
THE UN COMMISSION ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN LATIN
AMERICA
REF: SECSTATE 272561
¶1. Summary. In response to STATE 272561, Post recommends
the consideration of decentralized management of urban water
and sanitation systems in Honduras as a model to be further
studied by an expert team and eventually presented at the
upcoming UN Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD).
End Summary.
¶2. Access by the urban population to water supply and
sanitation services in Honduras is decidedly uneven.
Despite almost universal coverage for residential water
supply (93 percent of the urban population), access to
sanitation services is much lower (73 percent). In
addition, the high rates of access to water mask the poor
quality of service delivery and erratic quality of water
itself. In terms of sewerage, few wastewater treatment
systems exist nationally, resulting in the majority of
residential wastewater being returned to the environment
without any treatment. Not surprisingly, improved and
uninterrupted provision of water and sanitation continues to
be a priority for urban populations in Honduras, especially
for the urban poor, those most affected by a lack of piped
water supply and substandard sanitation services.
¶3. Over the past 10 years, the de facto decentralization of
water supply and sanitation has stimulated significant
advances in delivering basic urban services in secondary, or
medium-sized, cities throughout the country. (Rural water
systems have historically been locally managed, but it is
worth mentioning more about these rural systems as they
represent the supply side of the equation of providing the
water for the lower watershed, urban areas.) Another
benefit of decentralization in Honduras has been that
several rural communities have been able to help stabilize
water supply in some communities by stabilizing water
sources in the upper watersheds through activities such as
reforestation, crop rotation and changes in crops grown.
Any progress made, however, is being threatened by the
pressures of urban growth that present real and sometimes
insurmountable challenges to the provision of water and
sanitation services.
¶4. Honduras is a country undergoing a profound demographic
transition, not unlike the urbanization that many other
countries in the region have already experienced. The
urbanization that is projected to occur in Honduras over the
next five years (5 percent annual growth, one of the highest
urbanization rates in all of Latin America) is also expected
to impact a number of secondary cities throughout the
country, not only the traditional centers of Tegucigalpa and
San Pedro Sula. This high growth rate in the urban
population has already started to present challenges in the
provision of basic urban services, specifically water and
sanitation. Further, this high growth rate will continue to
put pressure on the upper watersheds which represent the
sources of the water for the urban areas.
¶5. Water and sanitation sector reform is now generating some
real momentum. The urban water and sanitation sector is
expected to undergo a dramatic change over the next five
years. Congress recently passed a bill, the Water and
Sanitation Law (August, 2003), providing for the
restructuring of the central government's water company,
Servicio Autonomo Nacional de Acueductos y Alcantarillados
(SANAA), and transfer of 20 urban water systems to
municipalities over the next five years. SANAA would retain
the operation and management of the Tegucigalpa water and
sanitation system, and become the principal regulating
agency of urban water systems elsewhere in the country.
While this bill has yet to be signed by President Maduro,
Post believes that there is a very high probability that
this bill will become law.
¶6. Passing a law alone does not immediately improve the
supply of water. For this reason, USAID Honduras is
supporting activities in upper watershed management in order
to ensure that both the supply and demand sides of the water
equation are being addressed.
¶7. The reforms included in the Water and Sanitation Law, in
particular the decentralization of the urban water and
sanitation systems, were an effectiveness condition of the
USD 26 million Honduras Potable Water and Sanitation
Investment Program (1048/SF-HO) funded by the Inter-American
Development Bank (IDB). This program has been awaiting
compliance with this conditionality for several years and
now, with the passage of this law, can begin disbursements.
This program will offer loans to eligible municipalities and
decentralized operators for expansion, rehabilitation, and
other infrastructure improvements to urban water and
sanitation systems in selected municipalities, as well as
technical assistance related to the construction and
rehabilitation of these civil works. A preliminary short
list of 22 potentially eligible municipalities coincides
with the same group of municipalities that have been
receiving technical assistance through USAID's Municipal
Development Project (1994-2003). In this manner, the IDB
loan is already capitalizing on the increased capacity of
the 22 municipalities resulting from USG-funded assistance
programs.
¶8. However, the IDB loan does not provide for technical
assistance for the transfer of the 20 SANAA systems that
will pass from central management to municipal management
within five years. USAID recognizes the importance of
providing assistance throughout the transfer process, and
has experience in having done so in 1999 when four urban
water systems were transferred to municipal governments. A
successful transfer of urban water systems in large
secondary cities such as El Progreso (pop. 157,188),
Juticalpa (pop. 93,726), Comayagua (pop. 96,450), La Ceiba
(pop. 140,931), and Danli (pop. 145,024) will be important
not only for uninterrupted water supply to the populations
of these urban centers, but also for these decentralized
operators to become eventually eligible for construction and
rehabilitation projects financed by the IDB loan.
¶9. Other bilateral donors, such as the Swedish International
Development Agency (SIDA), the Japanese International
Cooperation Agency (JICA), and the European Commission (EC),
have also demonstrated interest in contributing technical
assistance to municipalities and decentralized operators in
order to make them eligible for the IDB loan.
¶10. USAID-funded technical assistance facilitated the
transfer of the Catacamas (pop. 87,845) urban water supply
system, and the establishment of a decentralized entity,
Servicios Municipales de Catacamas (SERMUCAT), autonomous of
the municipality. SERMUCAT now provides a successful model
of decentralized municipal services provision for water
supply, sewerage, solid waste management, and street
cleaning. USAID-funded assistance also contributed to the
establishment of an autonomous decentralized entity in
Puerto Cortes (pop. 103,033). Similar technical assistance,
also funded by USAID, was provided in the transfer of the
Choluteca (pop. 134,452) urban water system. However, this
transfer was less successful and the autonomous
decentralized entity created, Aguas de Choluteca, has had
more difficulties in consolidating its management of
municipal services.
¶11. Other municipalities assisted by USAID-funded technical
assistance have also developed interesting models for
addressing basic service delivery from within the municipal
government, such as Santa Rosa de Copan (pop. 40,309),
Comayagua (pop. 96,450), and Tela (pop. 82,499).
¶12. An opportunity exists to generate lessons learned from
the existing experiences in order to provide additional
inputs to the increased decentralization of municipal
services (water supply, sewerage collection, and solid waste
management) throughout the country.
PALMER