Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03HANOI1989, AGENT ORANGE/DIOXIN UPDATE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03HANOI1989.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03HANOI1989 2003-08-05 10:24 2011-08-30 01:44 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Hanoi
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 06 HANOI 001989 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EAP/BCLTV, OES/STC (BPERRY), STAS (NNEUREITER), 
     EAP/RSP, EAP/PD AND OES/PCI 
DEPT PASS HHS FOR OGHA/STEIGER; NIH/FIC/GKEUSCH; 
     NIH/FIC/AHOLT; NIH/NIEHS/OLDEN, SASSAMAN; 
     CDC/OGH/BLOUNT; CDC/CEH/SINKS, BARRETT, NEEDHAM; 
     FDA/OIA/WBATTS 
DEPT PASS USAID FOR G/ENV, G/H 
DEPT PASS EPA FOR WFARLAND 
DEPT PASS OSTP FOR GAINES 
BANGKOK FOR REO 
SECDEF ALSO FOR ISA/AP/LSTERN AND ES/WVAN HOUTEN 
USDA FOR FAA/AO/SSAP/HEUTE, ITP/ODA/SHEIKH 
NSC FOR BEARDSWORTH 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL OSCI SENV EAID VM
SUBJECT:  AGENT ORANGE/DIOXIN UPDATE 
 
REF:  A. STATE 180975 
      B. STATE 155248 
      C. HANOI 0373 
      D. HANOI 1264 
 
1.  SUMMARY: On July 3, the Ambassador met with Vietnamese 
VFM Nguyen Dinh Bin to deliver Ref A talking points on the 
status of joint research on Agent Orange/Dioxin.  Bin 
emphasized the GVN's gratitude for humanitarian efforts by 
non-governmental organizations and U.S. congresspersons who 
have advocated the establishment medical research center for 
Agent Orange "victims" in Hanoi.  Bin appeared uninformed 
and misinformed about the status of U.S. contributions to 
promote the joint research program.    Separately, on July 
15, the Embassy received (via diplomatic pouch) and 
delivered a high-resolution gas chromatography mass 
spectrometer (GCMS) to the Vietnam National Center for 
Natural Sciences and Technology (NCST).  A two-person EPA 
team visited Hanoi during July 24-30 to work with NCST 
scientists on plans/requirements for installation of the 
GCMS, and to map out a plan/schedule for training NCST 
scientists in a bioassay technology, training in use of the 
GCMS, and for characterization of a potential dioxin "hot 
spot" site in Danang Airport.  As of July 2, the Carpenter- 
Tuong health research project had not been presented to 
Committee 33, and the Vietnamese members of the Joint 
Advisory Committee to be established per terms of the March 
2002 MOU had not been appointed.   END SUMMARY 
 
--------------------------------- 
Ambassador's Meeting with VFM Bin 
--------------------------------- 
 
2.  On July 3, the Ambassador met with Vietnamese First Vice- 
Minister of Foreign Affairs Nguyen Dinh Bin, also a member 
of Committee 33, to convey the points raised in Ref A 
concerning the status and next steps on joint cooperation on 
Agent Orange/Dioxin issue.  EST Officer accompanied the 
Ambassador.  Mr. Pham Van Que, Deputy Director of the MFA's 
Americas Department, also participated. 
 
3.  Prior to launching into a presentation of Ref A talking 
points, the Ambassador informed VFM Bin that many U.S. and 
international scientists did not accept claims made by 
Vietnamese scientists about the affects of AO/dioxin on the 
health of the Vietnamese people.  The Ambassador noted that, 
for example, while Vietnamese scientists attribute numerous 
forms of birth defects on exposure of the parents to 
AO/dioxin, international experts suspect that many are the 
result of other factors, such as deficiencies in the 
mother's diet.  Based on this genuine scientific dispute, 
the U.S. Government does not accept the label of "AO Victim" 
placed on virtually every afflicted child.  Bin, without 
acknowledging the scientific debate, responded that the USG 
should deal with this was a humanitarian issue.  Bin several 
times erroneously stated that dioxin was the "cause" of nine 
diseases.  Bin also ignored the point that international 
scientific research has linked dioxin to only one form of 
birth defect.  The Ambassador agreed that assistance to 
persons with health problems was indeed a humanitarian 
issue, which is why the U.S. Government supported health 
assistance programs in Vietnam and worldwide no matter what 
the cause.  (COMMENT:  When Vietnamese officials use the 
term "humanitarian assistance" related to the AO/Dioxin 
issue, they are actually talking about financial 
compensation to those persons whom the Government of Vietnam 
(GVN) has identified - without scientific evidence - as 
"victims of AO."  END COMMENT.) 
 
4.  After The Ambassador completed presentation of Ref A 
talking points, VFM Bin responded that he thought "good 
progress" had been made in joint scientific cooperation.  He 
noted that the March 2002 International Conference on 
AO/Dioxin had been the first of its kind, thus Vietnam's 
slow pace in implementing the terms of the MOU was 
"expected."  He acknowledged that Vietnam needed to speed up 
the appointment of the members of the Joint Advisory 
Committee (JAC), and noted that formation of the JAC was 
"important and inevitable."  Bin stated that the Vietnamese 
side had sent draft terms of reference (TOR) for the JAC to 
the U.S. side, but had not received a response.  EST Officer 
informed Bin that Office 33 had sent the TOR document via 
international mail to the U.S. National Institute of 
Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) on or about June 30, 
so NIEHS had not yet received the document.  The Ambassador 
pointed out that developing and coordinating TOR should be a 
task for the JAC to accomplish during its first meeting, so 
it was premature to discuss TOR without a committee.  (NOTE: 
EST Officer had received an informal copy of the TOR during 
a visit to Office 33 on July 1.  The document was presented 
without explanation.  On July 7, EST officer received an 
official copy of the document, delivered to the Embassy via 
the Vietnamese postal system.  The envelope was postmarked 
July 1.  Another copy of the document arrived at NIEHS on 
July 21.  END NOTE.) 
 
5.  EST Officer gave a brief overview of status of "Project 
2" (soil sampling and "hot spot" site characterization in 
Danang Airport).  Bin, citing talking points provided to him 
by Office 33, pointed out that the U.S. had not yet provided 
Vietnam with the results of tests of Danang soil samples 
shipped to the U.S. in June 2002.  EST Officer responded 
that, contrary to Office 33's information, the test results 
had been provided to scientists of the National Center for 
Natural Sciences and Technology in early March 2003. 
 
6.  Bin continued that the GVN highly appreciated the 
support received from NGO's and the efforts by three members 
of the U.S. Congress who advocate the establishment of a 
center for research and medical treatment of AO victims. 
Bin expressed hope that the USG would assist by providing 
funds for this center. 
 
7.  Deputy Director Que commented that the GVN did not view 
this as a "legal case," even though Vietnamese authorities 
were fully aware of the legal suit brought by U.S. veterans 
against the U.S. manufacturer of AO.  Que admitted that the 
GVN had considered filing a similar suit, but had abandoned 
that idea several years ago because of its negative 
implications on the overall U.S.-Vietnam bilateral 
relationship.  Que said the GVN had appropriated a large 
portion of its budget to assist people suffering from 
AO/Dioxin exposure in all locations.  Que also reiterated 
Bin's appeal to view this as a humanitarian issue. 
 
8.  (COMMENT:  Bin appeared uninformed and/or misinformed 
about several issues related to the status of joint 
cooperation on AO/dioxin.  When EST Officer visited Office 
33 on July 1, Dr. Nguyen Tien Dung had to cut the meeting 
short in order to go the MFA for a meeting to prepare the 
MFA for the Ambassador-VFM meeting.  Based on remarks made 
by Dung and other Vietnamese scientists, the MFA had not 
sent a representative to attend working level meetings on 
the joint research program for a long time.  It appears that 
Committee 33 has not met formally for an even longer time. 
The fact that Bin did not appear to be well-informed about 
the status of the joint program is very telling in terms of 
how senior GVN leadership views the scientific cooperation. 
When senior Vietnamese officials, either from MFA or other 
agencies, appeal to senior U.S. officials for assistance in 
"addressing the lasting effects of AO," they are not talking 
about joint scientific research and capacity building; they 
are talking about financial compensation and medical 
treatment for all those who are classified as "AO victims" 
and for clean-up of all potential dioxin "hot spots" on 
former U.S. military bases and other locations.  Even when 
both sides use the term "humanitarian issue," usage of the 
term differs in both meaning and intent.  END COMMENT) 
 
----------------------------- 
Update of Status of Project 2 
----------------------------- 
 
9.  On July 14, the high-resolution gas chromatography mass 
spectrometer (GCMS) acquired by the U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency (EPA) from the U.S. Centers for Disease 
Control (CDC) arrived in Hanoi via diplomatic pouch, and the 
Embassy delivered it to the Vietnam National Center for 
Natural Sciences and Technology (NCST) on July 15.  NCST 
intends to place the GCMS on the ground floor of NCST's 
Institute of Chemistry.   EPA officers William Coakley and 
Vance Fong visited Hanoi July 24-30 and met with NCST 
scientists from the Institute of Chemistry and Institute of 
Biotechnology who are the principal researchers 
participating in "Project 2" (environmental research on a 
suspected dioxin "hot spot" in Danang Airport).  The primary 
Vietnamese contacts were Dr. Dang Thi Cam Ha, Head, 
Environmental Biotechnology Laboratory; and Dr. Pham Huu Ly, 
Deputy Director, Institute of Chemistry. (NOTE:  The EPA 
team will prepare a full, separate report on their visit. 
END NOTE) 
 
10.  The primary purposes of this visit to NCST were to 
unpack and inspect all GCMS components, review in detail the 
requirements and specifications for the installation as well 
as the installation schedule to include assembly and 
performance testing of GCMS and training of NCST personnel 
in its use.  These tasks should all be accomplished by 
November 2003. 
 
11.  During the visit, the EPA officers informed NCST 
scientists that EPA intends to fund the training of two NCST 
scientists in a two-week session at the laboratory of the 
company that produces the CALUX bioassay screening 
technology.  This training covers mammalian, liver cell 
culturing and bioassay procedures, and all extractions, 
cleanup, and analytical software procedures.  Following this 
training in the U.S., the company will provide additional 
training at the NCST lab and provide all necessary supplies 
and chemical reagents. 
 
12.  The two EPA officers and NCST scientists opened all the 
crates containing the GCMS components, inspected the 
separate components for any damage (none detected), and 
conducted an inventory (nothing missing).  They also 
inspected the room that is being renovated to house the GCMS 
and advised the Vietnamese on requirements for electric 
power, cooling water, air conditioning, measures to 
eliminate vibrational interference, electrical outlets, and 
emergency shut-off switch. 
 
13.  On July 26, the EPA team met with Dr. Ha, Dr. Ly, and 
Colonel Nguyen Quang Toai, Department of Science, Technology 
and Environment, Ministry of National Defense (MND), to 
discuss in general terms a tentative plan and techniques for 
hot spot site characterization and a subsequent pilot 
remediation project at the former AO storage and loading 
area at Danang Airport (the suspect dioxin hot spot from 
which soil samples were taken).  The discussions focused on 
possible soil sampling techniques that could most 
efficiently and effectively determine the scope of the hot 
spot and paths/routes of potential migration of dioxin away 
from the hot spot.  Dr. Ha (apparently without prior 
coordination with Ly and/or Toai) suggested that Dr. Toai 
would visit NCST on July 28 or 29 to provide more details 
concerning the actual dimensions of the storage/loading 
area, the surrounding topography, and stream that passes by 
the area.  However, Dr. Toai never visited NCST for follow- 
up discussions. 
 
14.  On July 29, Dr. Dang Vu Minh, General Director, NCST, 
hosted a lunch in honor of the EPA officers to acknowledge 
their efforts in Project 2 and the acquisition and delivery 
of the GCMS.  Dr. Minh was extremely grateful for the GMCS 
and stated that he hoped the installation could be completed 
by the end of the year so that soil sampling using the GCMS 
could be accomplished by January 2004.  He said he intended 
to request additional funds from the Ministry of Science and 
Technology (one source of NCST's budget) for upgrading the 
room containing the GCMS.  He also expressed great 
enthusiasm about the potential of receiving the CALUX 
technology.  (COMMENT:  Dr. Minh is a member of the Central 
Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam and a member of 
the National Assembly, so he has some political clout as 
well as scientific expertise.  He is a chemist and former 
Director of NCST's Institute of Chemistry.  His support for 
Project 2 is very important.  END COMMENT) 
 
15.  Overall, the visit was successful and productive.  The 
Vietnamese are very interested in moving forward with 
certain aspects of Project 2.  The EPA team and NCST 
scientists devised a schedule of events (installation of 
GCMS, training in use of GCMS, training in CALUX technology, 
transfer of CALUX technology) per EPA's objectives. 
However, EST Officer and the EPA team detected several 
potential negatives: 
 
     --In discussions on hot spot site characterization and 
remediation, it became apparent that differences in opinion 
on "how hot is hot" and/or "what's hot and what's not" could 
surface as we attempt to move forward in developing a site 
characterization plan.  When the EPA team explained U.S. 
guidelines and standards for levels of contamination 
permitted for residential vice industrial areas, the 
Vietnamese responded that the Vietnamese leadership would 
not accept such a distinction and would want remediation to 
bring contamination down to a level fit for residential 
purposes.  At this point, EST Officer pointed out that since 
Vietnam, not the U.S., would pay for remediation efforts 
beyond this one pilot project, the Vietnamese leadership 
would probably have to adopt a less rigid policy. 
 
     --In early March 2003, the EPA had sent the NCST 
scientists the test results and analyses for the ten Danang 
soil samples shipped to the U.S. in July 2002.  Prior to 
shipment, Dr. Ha and Dr. Ly had agreed to perform similar 
tests (possibly with low resolution GCMS) on samples of the 
same soil in order to have a comparison of the two test 
results.  When the EPA officers inquired about NCST's test 
results (which EPA had never received), Dr. Ha replied that 
she did not have sufficient funds in her budget to pay for 
the tests.   According to Dr. Ha, the cost for a test 
conducted in Vietnam was $600/sample.  The EPA team obtained 
Ha's agreement to have tests conducted on 3-5 of the most 
highly contaminated of the ten samples.  This exemplifies a 
persistent detractor to establishing a reliable partnerhip - 
verbal commitments from the Vietnamese side during face-to- 
face meetings are often ignored and the Vietnamese often do 
not respond in a timely manner to queries via e-mail. 
 
     --The role of the MND and its cooperation with NCST and 
EPA is critical to the success of site characterization and 
future pilot remediation project at Danang.  More than one 
year ago, EPA initially requested past sampling results 
conducted by either MND and NCST, but the Vietnamese have 
not delivered.  EPA officers and EST officer sense that 
there potential conflict between NCST and MND could develop 
over control of the joint project.  It is very possible that 
MND is envious of the technical and material support (lab 
equipment, training, GCMS) given to NCST. 
 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
STATUS OF HEALTH RESEARCH AND JOINT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 
--------------------------------------------- --------- 
 
16.  In a letter dated June 23 (postmarked July 1), Dr. 
Nguyen Ngoc Sinh, Director, National Environmental Agency 
(NEA), Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, 
responded to a 27 February 2003 letter from Dr. Kenneth 
Olden and Dr. Anne Sassaman of NIEHS urging the Vietnamese 
to appoint members to the Joint Advisory Committee (JAC). 
Sinh's letter was addressed to Olden, Sassaman, and Embassy 
EST Officer.   The letter ignores the critical issue of the 
JAC, but takes the offensive to criticize the U.S. for 
delays in Project 2.  Pertinent translated extracts follow. 
BEGIN QUOTE:  Although recently there were organizational 
changes in the Government, such as some ministries were 
split and some new ministries have been established, these 
changes have not affected the activities of the Steering 
Committee 33.  We also note the delay by the United States 
in the implementation of Project No 2.  The Vietnamese side 
has invested in the construction and provided funding for 
the newly built laboratory belonging to the Institute of 
Chemistry, National Center for Natural Sciences and 
Technology, which will be used for Project No 2.  At the 
same time, we have sent 10 soil samples of the Da Nang 
airport area to the Untied States for dioxin analyses as per 
the agreement between Vietnam and the United States under 
Project No 2 framework.   We look forward to the United 
States' prompt completion of Project No 2.  In particular, 
the United States will follow the plan agreed upon in Hawaii 
on the provision of some testing equipment and instruments, 
and on completion of some analytical methods including the 
Calux analytical method and a high resolution GCMS in order 
to enhance the quality of residual dioxin assessment at 
site, as well as to have scientific basis to determine 
poison cleaning methods for Da Nang area in the future.  END 
QUOTE. 
 
17.  NIEHS did not receive this letter until July 21. 
Although the letter does not mention an attachment, a draft 
TOR for the JAC was attached without explanation.  Also, 
Sinh's letter implies erroneously that EPA made a formal 
commitment to provide the GCMS.  EPA only promised to make a 
serious effort to locate a used GCMS.  The Vietnamese were 
made fully aware that funding for this acquisition was not 
readily available within EPA's budget.  The fact that EPA 
delivered reflects highly on their positive attitude toward 
achieving success in this project.  The letter also does not 
give EPA credit for providing test results on the 10 soil 
samples or for supplying the majority of the equipment and 
supplies for the laboratory in NCST.  EST Officer and Dr. 
Sassaman are preparing a response to Sinh. 
 
18.  On 1 July, EST Officer met with Dr. Nguyen Tien Dung, 
Director, Office 33.  Dung stated that the Carpenter-Tuong 
health research project had not yet been submitted to 
Committee 33 for review and approval.  Dung said that he had 
sent the grant proposal back to the Ministry of Health for 
further review and comment because he wanted to know how 
this project would relate to a similar health research 
project currently funded by the GVN.  Dung could not state 
with certainty when the proposal would be presented to 
Committee 33 or when the GVN would appoint members of the 
JAC. 
 
19.  As of August 1, the NCST had not yet received approval 
from Committee 33 to hold a joint workshop on remediation 
technologies to be funded and joint organized by NIEHS, 
tentatively scheduled for early November 2003.  NIEHS is 
funding the travel of two NCST scientists from the Institute 
of Biotechnology and one officer from NCST's International 
Cooperation Department to visit NIEHS in Research Triangle 
Park and to visit EPA in Washington, DC in late August - 
early September.  The purpose of the meetings is to plan the 
remediation workshop and discuss overall cooperation in 
environmental research. 
PORTER