Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 02ROME4292, GPS/GALILEO CONSULTATIONS IN ITALY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #02ROME4292.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
02ROME4292 2002-09-04 13:46 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Rome
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 03 ROME 004292 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR OES/SAT/JULIE KARNER 
NATO PASS SES-4 FOR MELVIN FLACK 
USDOC PASS OFFICE OF SPACE COMMERCIALIZATION 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/11/2007 
TAGS: TSPA TSPL ECON TSPL ECON TSPL ECON IT ITTSPA ITTSPA
SUBJECT: GPS/GALILEO CONSULTATIONS IN ITALY 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 02        ROME  04292  01 OF 03  041407Z 
 
CLASSIFIED BY: ACTING ECONOMIC MINISTER COUNSELOR DAVID MULENEX FOR REA 
SONS 1.5 (B,D) 
 
1.  (C) SUMMARY:  DURING 23-24 JULY CONSULTATIONS IN ROME, 
ITALIAN GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES PROVIDED A DIVERSE SET OF 
NUANCED RESPONSES TO US CONCERNS OVER THE POSSIBLE OVERLAY OF 
THE GPS M-CODE BY GALILEO PRS.  WHILE ITALIAN TECHNICAL 
EXPERTS WORKING ON GALILEO EXPRESSED SOME SYMPATHY TO US 
CONCERNS AND A WILLINGNESS TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE, THOSE 
OFFICIALS DEALING WITH GOI GALILEO POLICY RESPONDED IN A MORE 
AMBIGUOUS MANNER.  BUT EVEN THEY ACKNOWLEDGED USG CONCERNS, 
EVEN IF THEY WERE NONCOMMITTAL ON A WAY FORWARD TO FINDING A 
SOLUTION.  ALTHOUGH THE USG GPS DELEGATION MET WITH 
REPRESENTATIVES OF A VARIETY OF GOI AGENCIES, THE ITALIANS 
HAD CLEARLY COORDINATED THEIR POSITION AS A RESULT OF HAVING 
BEEN BRIEFED IN DETAIL ABOUT A DRAFT REPORT ON GPS-GALILEO 
INTERRELATIONSHIP PRODUCED BY AN AD HOC WORKING GROUP OF THE 
NATO C3 BOARD.  ON THE WHOLE, THE ITALIANS SEEM COMMITTED TO 
GPS-GALILEO INTEROPERABILITY, BUT IT IS UNCLEAR HOW THIS 
WILLINGNESS WILL TRANSLATE INTO ITALIAN ASSISTANCE IN 
ACHIEVING A FAVORABLE RESOLUTION OF THE M-CODE OVERLAY ISSUE. 
 END SUMMARY. 
 
3.  (SBU) OES/SAT JULIE KARNER AND USNATO DIRECTOR OF THE 
COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS DIVISION MELVIN FLACK, ACCOMPANIED 
BY ESTOFF LORENZO MARTINI, MET WITH OFFICIALS OF THE ITALIAN 
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS (MFA), THE ITALIAN MINISTRY OF 
TRANSPORTATION (MOT) AND THE ITALIAN SPACE AGENCY (ASI).  IN 
ALL THREE MEETINGS, THE US DELEGATION MADE IT CLEAR THAT THE 
USG IS NOT OPPOSED TO EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT OF THE GALILEO 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 03        ROME  04292  01 OF 03  041407Z 
GLOBAL NAVIGATIONAL SATELLITE SYSTEM (GNSS) IN PRINCIPLE BUT 
WISHES TO ASSURE THAT GPS AND GALILEO ARE FULLY INTEROPERABLE 
SO THAT GNSS CIVILIAN CONSUMERS OBTAIN THE BEST POSSIBLE 
SERVICE AT THE LOWEST PRICE.  YET, THE USG CAN NOT ACCEPT THE 
OVERLAY OF A PORTION OF THE U.S. GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM 
(GPS) MILITARY SIGNAL (M-CODE) BY THE PROPOSED GALILEO 
PUBLICLY REGULATED SIGNAL (PRS) BECAUSE OF THE RISKS TO U.S. 
AND NATO MILITARY CAPABILITIES.  THE DELEGATION STRESSED THAT 
WHILE THE USG WAS EAGER TO COLLABORATE WITH THE EUROPEANS ON 
GALILEO INTEROPERABILITY, THE M-CODE OVERLAY ISSUE WOULD BE 
AN OBSTACLE TO FUTURE USG COOPERATION IF IT REMAINS 
UNRESOLVED.  MR. FLACK ANALYZED THE POTENTIAL DETRIMENTAL 
IMPACT TO NATO WAR-FIGHTING CAPABILITIES AND THE RISKS TO 
NATO TROOPS AS A RESULT OF AN M-CODE OVERLAY.  IN PARTICULAR, 
MR. FLACK EXPLAINED THE POTENTIAL HARM TO NATO OBJECTIVES AND 
PERSONNEL IF AN ADVERSARY OBTAINED THE CAPACITY TO USE 
GALILEO SIGNALS FOR ITS OWN WAR-FIGHTING CAPABILITIES. 
CONCERNS OVER THE ROBUSTNESS OF ENCRYPTION TO BE USED BY PRS 
AND THE POSSIBILITY OF A WIDE DISSEMINATION OF ACCESS TO PRS 
AMONG NON-GOVERNMENTAL USERS REPRESENT AN INHERENT RISK OF 
THE PROLIFERATION OF GNSS CAPABILITY TO POSSIBLE NATO 
ADVERSARIES.  BY OVERLAYING THE M-CODE, NATO FORCES WOULD 
DEGRADE THEIR ABILITY TO USE GNSS SIGNALS WHILE TRYING TO 
DENY PRS TO AN ADVERSARY IN THE THEATER OF OPERATIONS.  THE 
ALTERNATIVE, CHANGING THE PRS ENCRYPTION KEYS TO DENY ACCESS 
TO THE ADVERSARY, WOULD BE DEPENDENT ON NATO'S ABILITY TO 
OBTAIN A RAPID CONSENSUS FOR COOPERATION AMONG ALL THE 
MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (EU) AND THE EUROPEAN SPACE 
AGENCY (ESA), SOME OF WHOM ARE NOT NATO MEMBERS.  IN 
ADDITION, MS. KARNER EXPRESSED CONCERNS ABOUT THE EUROPEAN 
COMMITMENT TO INTEROPERABILITY, NOTING AN APPARENT EUROPEAN 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 04        ROME  04292  01 OF 03  041407Z 
PREFERENCE TO PURSUING INDEPENDENCE RATHER THAN 
INTERDEPENDENCE IN THE AREAS OF TIMING, GEODESY AND SIGNAL 
STRUCTURE. 
 
4.  (SBU) AT THE MFA, THE DELEGATION MET WITH COUNSELOR 
ENRICO GUICCIARDI, HEAD OF SPACE COOPERATION AFFAIRS OF THE 
MFA'S DIRECTORATE OF ECONOMIC COOPERATION.  GUICCIARDI 
ACKNOWLEDGED THE USG'S CONCERNS BUT DID NOT ADDRESS THEM IN 
DETAIL, SHIELDING HIMSELF BEHIND HIS LACK OF TECHNICAL 
EXPERTISE.  HE BELIEVED THAT USG CONCERNS WERE SOMEWHAT 
PREMATURE SINCE GALILEO WAS AT SUCH AN EARLY STAGE OF 
DEVELOPMENT.  HE PROVIDED AN OVERVIEW OF THE JOINT 
UNDERTAKING BETWEEN ESA AND THE EU TO MANAGE THE PROGRAM. 
THE UNDERLYING THESIS OF HIS PRESENTATION WAS THAT THE M-CODE 
OVERLAY ISSUE COULD BE ADDRESSED COMPREHENSIVELY ONCE THE 
EUROPEANS HAD WORKED OUT ALL THE WRINKLES IN THE OPERATION OF 
THE JOINT UNDERTAKING.  WITHOUT PROVIDING A COMMITMENT, 
GUICCIARDI SEEMED AMENABLE TO FURTHER DISCUSSIONS ON THIS 
ISSUE BUT ADMITTED THAT HE WAS NOT THE KEY GOI DECISION-MAKER 
ON GALILEO. 
 
5.  (C) ON 24 JULY, THE DELEGATION MET WITH COUNSELOR RENATO 
LIBASSI, A SPECIAL ADVISOR TO THE MINISTER OF TRANSPORTATION 
AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE GOI'S INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP ON 
 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
                           CONFIDENTIAL     PTQ5851 
 
PAGE 01        ROME  04292  02 OF 03  041408Z 
ACTION OES-01 
 
INFO  LOG-00   NP-00    AGRE-00  AID-00   AMAD-00  CEA-01   CIAE-00 
      CTME-00  INL-00   DODE-00  DOEE-00  DOTE-00  PERC-00  SRPP-00 
      EB-00    EUR-00   EXIM-01  E-00     FAAE-00  VC-00    FRB-00 
      H-01     TEDE-00  INR-00   ITC-01   L-00     VCE-00   NASA-01 
      AC-01    NSAE-00  NSCE-00  OMB-01   OPIC-01  PM-00    ACE-00 
      SP-00    IRM-00   SSO-00   SS-00    STR-00   TRSE-00  T-00 
      USIE-00  EPAE-00  PMB-00   DRL-02   G-00     SAS-00     /011W 
                  ------------------E24E86  041412Z /38 
R 041346Z SEP 02 
FM AMEMBASSY ROME 
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 5691 
USDOC WASHDC 
USMISSION USNATO 
INFO EU INTEREST COLLECTIVE 
AMCONSUL FLORENCE 
AMCONSUL MILAN 
AMCONSUL NAPLES 
 
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 02 OF 03 ROME 004292 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR OES/SAT/JULIE KARNER 
NATO PASS SES-4 FOR MELVIN FLACK 
USDOC PASS OFFICE OF SPACE COMMERCIALIZATION 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/11/2007 
TAGS: TSPA TSPL ECON TSPL ECON TSPL ECON IT ITTSPA ITTSPA
SUBJECT: GPS/GALILEO CONSULTATIONS IN ITALY 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 02        ROME  04292  02 OF 03  041408Z 
 
GALILEO.  WHILE ACKNOWLEDGING THE US DELEGATION'S CONCERNS, 
LIBASSI DID NOT DIRECTLY ADDRESS THEIR MERITS.  INSTEAD, HE 
PROVIDED A NUANCED RESPONSE THAT REITERATED AN ITALIAN 
COMMITMENT TO AN OPEN US-EUROPEAN DIALOGUE WITH THE GOAL OF 
ACHIEVING GPS-GALILEO INTERDEPENDENCE WHILE MAINTAINING EU 
SOLIDARITY.  LIBASSI STRESSED THAT ITALY DID NOT WANT TO 
WEAKEN THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION (EC) BY PURSUING A SEPARATE 
GALILEO DIALOGUE WITH THE UNITED STATES AND THAT ITALY 
INTENDS TO GIVE ITS "FULL, LOYAL SUPPORT TO THE EC" IN THIS 
MATTER.  WHILE HE LEFT THE DOOR OPEN TO A NATO-EU DIALOGUE ON 
THE M-CODE OVERLAY ISSUE, HE INDICATED THAT THE US-EU 
NEGOTIATIONS SHOULD TAKE PRIMACY OVER ANY NATO-EU DISCUSSION. 
 ALTHOUGH HE DID NOT DISPUTE THE MERITS OF THE CONCERNS OF 
THE US OR OTHER NATO MEMBERS ON M-CODE OVERLAY, HE EXPRESSED 
A CONCERN ABOUT THE USE OF SECURITY ISSUES AS A COVER FOR 
COMMERCIAL OR POLITICAL OBJECTIVES.  SPECIFICALLY, LIBASSI 
DID NOT WANT TO SEE THE OVERLAY ISSUE USED BY UNNAMED EU 
MEMBER STATES TO USE THEIR DUAL MEMBERSHIP IN NATO AS A MEANS 
TO REOPEN AGREEMENTS THAT HAD BEEN CONCLUDED WITHIN THE EU 
TRANSPORT COUNCIL IN ORDER TO RENEGOTIATE BETTER TERMS. 
(EMBASSY COMMENT:  HE MAY HAVE BEEN REFERRING TO THE 
COMPETITION FROM GERMANY TO BE THE SITE OF THE FUTURE 
ADMINISTRATIVE SEAT OF GALILEO.  ALTHOUGH THE GERMANS WERE 
LATECOMERS IN JOINING GALILEO, THEY ARE AGGRESSIVELY SEEKING 
TO HAVE THE GALILEO HEADQUARTERS BASED IN GERMANY ACCORDING 
TO A AUGUST 21 CONVERSATION BETWEEN ESTOFF AND THE GERMAN 
EMBASSY COUNSELOR FOR SCIENCE AFFAIRS JEN-PETER VOSS 
(PROTECT).  GUICCIARDI MENTIONED ITALIAN-GERMAN FRICTION OVER 
THIS ISSUE BUT DID NOT GO INTO DETAIL.  END COMMENT)  HE 
CLAIMED THAT THERE WAS A "STRONG POLITICAL WILL" WITHIN THE 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 03        ROME  04292  02 OF 03  041408Z 
EU TO COME TO TERMS WITH THE UNITED STATES OVER GALILEO AND 
IMPLIED THAT FULL US ENGAGEMENT IN GPS-GALILEO 
INTEROPERABILITY "MIGHT AFFECT DESIGN."  HE NOTED THAT THE 
EUROPEANS WILL LOOK VERY CAREFULLY AT THE ISSUES OF ACCESS 
CONTROL AND MANAGEMENT OF PRS ENCRYPTION.  ALTHOUGH HE 
CLAIMED NOT TO HAVE SEEN A COPY OF THE NATO C3 BOARD'S 
WORKING GROUP'S DRAFT REPORTON GPS-GALILEO 
INTERRELATIONSHIP, HE ADMITTED TOHAVING BEEN BRIEFED ON ITS 
CONTENTS. 
 
6.  (C)  LIBASSI MADE AN OFFHAND COMMENT REGARDING THE ROLE 
OF CHINA, WHICH ALLOWED THE US DELEGATION THE OPPORTUNITY TO 
ASK FOR CLARIFICATION ON THE NATURE OF CHINESE PARTICIPATION 
IN GALILEO THROUGH A PARTNERSHIP ARRANGEMENT WITH ESA. 
LIBASSI RESPONDED THAT THE ROLE OF ESA'S NON-EU COLLABORATORS 
SUCH AS CHINA COULD PLAY IN GALILEO HAD NOT BEEN DECIDED.  HE 
SEEMED TO UNDERSTAND THAT EXTENSIVE CHINESE PARTICIPATION IN 
GALILEO WOULD HEIGHTEN US CONCERNS OVER THE POTENTIAL OF 
NON-NATO COUNTRIES TO HAVE A DE FACTO VETO POWER OVER NATO 
DECISION-MAKING IN A CRISIS THROUGH PRS OVERLAY OF THE 
M-CODE.  IN ADDITION, HE MADE AN OBLIQUE COMMENT REGARDING 
"NATO BECOMING AN ASSISTANCE GROUP" OVER TIME.  IT WAS NOT 
CLEAR WHAT HE MEANT BY THIS STATEMENT, AND THE US DELEGATION 
DID NOT HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PRESS HIM FOR CLARIFICATION. 
(EMBASSY COMMENT:  WE VIEW THIS STATEMENT TO REFLECT 
LIBASSI'S PERSONAL OPINION ONLY.  HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY 
COMPETENCY IN NATO AFFAIRS, SINCE HE DOES NOT HAVE ANY DIRECT 
ROLE IN ITALIAN NATO POLICYMAKING, NOR DOES HE SEEM TO HAVE 
ANY EXPERTISE IN THIS AREA.  END COMMENT.) 
 
7.  (C) AT ASI, THE DELEGATION MET WITH THE DIRECTOR OF 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 04        ROME  04292  02 OF 03  041408Z 
EXTERNAL RELATIONS, ROMEO PERNICE, AND THE TWO CHIEF ASI 
REPRESENTATIVES TO THE ESA AND EU TECHNICAL WORKING GROUPS ON 
GALILEO, DR. FRANCO MARCONICCHIO AND DR. FRANCO MARUCCI. 
MARCONICCHIO AND MARUCCI ARE DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE ITALIAN 
CONTRIBUTION TO THE TECHNICAL DEVELOPMENT OF GALILEO.  THIS 
DISCUSSION WAS MUCH MORE OPEN AND DIRECT WITH REGARD TO THE 
ITALIAN RESPONSE.  THE ASI REPRESENTATIVES, ON THE WHOLE, 
EXPRESSED A SINCERE DESIRE TO COOPERATE WITH THE UNITED 
STATES ON GPS-GALILEO INTEROPERABILITY.  MARCONICCHIO, IN 
PARTICULAR, ASKED IF IT WOULD BE POSSIBLE TO CONTINUE 
US-EUROPEAN TECHNICAL DISCUSSIONS ON THE NON-PRS GALILEO 
SERVICES AND SEPARATE THEM FROM THE M-CODE OVERLAY ISSUE. 
WHILE THE USG PLANS TO GO FORWARD WITH GPS-GALILEO TECHNICAL 
DISCUSSIONS, THE M-CODE OVERLAY ISSUE, IF IT REMAINS 
UNRESOLVED, WILL EVENTUALLY BECOME AN IMPEDIMENT TO FUTURE 
USG COOPERATION WITH GALILEO.  FROM ASI'S PERSPECTIVE, ON THE 
WHOLE, US-EUROPEAN TECHNICAL COOPERATION ON GPS-GALILEO ARE 
PROCEEDING IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION.  ASI IS COMMITTED TO 
COMPLETE INTEROPERABILITY WITH GPS AS BEING A FUNDAMENTAL 
GOAL IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF GALILEO.  THE ASI TEAM NOTED THAT 
A PRELIMINARY SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW FOR GALILEO WAS COMPLETED 
THE WEEK OF 14-20 JULY 2002 BUT THE EXACT CAPABILITIES OF PRS 
HAD NOT YET BEEN DECIDED.  WHATEVER THEIR PERSONNEL 
PERCEPTIONS OF THE MERITS OF THE U.S. CONCERNS ABOUT THE 
 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
                           CONFIDENTIAL     PTQ5852 
 
PAGE 01        ROME  04292  03 OF 03  041408Z 
ACTION OES-01 
 
INFO  LOG-00   NP-00    AGRE-00  AID-00   AMAD-00  CEA-01   CIAE-00 
      CTME-00  DODE-00  DOEE-00  DOTE-00  PERC-00  SRPP-00  EB-00 
      EUR-00   EXIM-01  E-00     FAAE-00  VC-00    FRB-00   H-01 
      TEDE-00  INR-00   ITC-01   L-00     VCE-00   NASA-01  AC-01 
      NSAE-00  NSCE-00  OMB-01   OPIC-01  PM-00    ACE-00   SP-00 
      IRM-00   SSO-00   SS-00    STR-00   TRSE-00  T-00     USIE-00 
      PMB-00   DRL-02   G-00     SAS-00     /011W 
                  ------------------E24E8A  041412Z /38 
R 041346Z SEP 02 
FM AMEMBASSY ROME 
TO SECSTATE WASHDC 5692 
USDOC WASHDC 
USMISSION USNATO 
INFO EU INTEREST COLLECTIVE 
AMCONSUL FLORENCE 
AMCONSUL MILAN 
AMCONSUL NAPLES 
 
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 03 OF 03 ROME 004292 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR OES/SAT/JULIE KARNER 
NATO PASS SES-4 FOR MELVIN FLACK 
USDOC PASS OFFICE OF SPACE COMMERCIALIZATION 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/11/2007 
TAGS: TSPA TSPL ECON TSPL ECON TSPL ECON IT ITTSPA ITTSPA
SUBJECT: GPS/GALILEO CONSULTATIONS IN ITALY 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 02        ROME  04292  03 OF 03  041408Z 
 
RISKS OF THE M-CODE OVERLAY (MARUCCI SEEMED TO BE 
PARTICULARLY SKEPTICAL), THEY ALL ACKNOWLEDGED THAT THEY 
UNDERSTOOD THE SERIOUSNESS WITH WHICH THE UNITED STATES VIEWS 
THIS ISSUE.  THE ASI TEAM ALSO ADMITTED TO HAVING BEEN 
BRIEFED ON THE CONTENTS OF THE NATO C3 REPORT BEFORE THEIR 
MEETING WITH THE US DELEGATION. 
 
8.  (C) EMBASSY COMMENT:  THE ITALIANS WERE FAIRLY UNANIMOUS 
IN THEIR DESIRE TO CONTINUE A DIALOGUE WITH THE UNITED STATES 
WITH THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF REACHING A COMPREHENSIVE LEVEL OF 
INTEROPERABILITY BETWEEN GPS-GALILEO.  THE GOI DOES NOT SEEM 
TO HAVE A DEEPLY VESTED INTEREST IN PRS OVERLAYING THE GPS 
M-CODE ISSUE BUT DECLINED TO COMMIT OPENLY TO SEEKING A 
RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUE, OSTENSIBLY TO MAINTAIN EU UNITY. 
THE ASI TECHNICAL EXPERTS SEEMED TO BE THE MOST WILLING TO 
SEEK A RESOLUTION, WHICH SUGGESTS THAT THE DECISION TO 
OVERLAY THE M-CODE IS BEING DRIVEN BY POLITICAL RATHER THAN 
TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS, AT LEAST IN ITALY.  UNFORTUNATELY, 
IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE FOR THE DELEGATION TO MEET WITH 
REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ITALIAN MINISTRY OF DEFENSE, WHICH 
MIGHT HAVE A MORE VESTED INTEREST IN THE SANCTITY OF THE 
M-CODE.  END COMMENT. 
 
9.  (SBU)  OES/SAT JULIE KARNER CLEARED ON THIS MESSAGE. 
USNATO DIRECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ELECTRONICS DIVISION 
MELVIN FLACK WAS UNABLE TO COORDINATE ON THIS CABLE PRIOR TO 
ITS TRANSMISSION. 
SKODON 
 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
PAGE 03        ROME  04292  03 OF 03  041408Z 
 
                       CONFIDENTIAL 
 
> 
 2002ROME04292 - Classification: CONFIDENTIAL