Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 10BEIJING80, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-JAPAN ALLIANCE, U.S. POLICY, NORTH

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10BEIJING80.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
10BEIJING80 2010-01-13 09:09 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Beijing
VZCZCXRO6582
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHBJ #0080 0130909
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 130909Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7595
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS BEIJING 000080 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/CM, EAP/PA, EAP/PD, C 
HQ PACOM FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR (J007) 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PREL ECON SENV KGHG KMDR OPRC CH
 
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-JAPAN ALLIANCE, U.S. POLICY, NORTH 
KOREA 
 
-------------------- 
  Editorial Quotes 
-------------------- 
 
1. U.S.-JAPAN ALLIANCE 
 
"Where should U.S.-Japan alliance go?" 
 
The official Xinhua Daily Telegraph (Xinhua Meiri Dianxun)(01/13)(pg 
8): "Experts say that if an alliance is running well, there is no 
need to reiterate its importance.  However, U.S.-Japan relations 
have seen some friction over the Futenma base and the U.S.-Japan 
[secret (nuclear) deal issues.  Neither the U.S. nor Japan has 
mentioned weakening the alliance.  Japan has requested a decrease in 
its burden, while the U.S. hopes that it won't negatively influence 
its military strategy.  Such conflicts will go on, but there is 
little possibility that the alliance will undergo a major change. 
Japan's long-term goal is to be a normal country.  However, at 
present, the biggest obstacle is the U.S.  The recent contradictions 
between the two are in fact the Hatoyama cabinet's tentative 
measures toward the U.S.  If the U.S.-Japan alliance undergoes any 
changes, the U.S.-Japan bilateral relations and even the strategic 
situation in the Asia-Pacific will be severely influenced." 
 
2. U.S. POLICY 
 
"'Quiet diplomacy' and 'smart power' in the present world" 
 
The official intellectual publication Guangming Daily (Guangming 
Ribao)(01/13)(pg 8): "The changes in the world's situation reflect 
the profound changes in the international political and economic 
structure, the balance of international forces and the significant 
difference between the development of and the reality of a situation 
that some western countries envisioned years ago.  Frequently 
imposing high-profile pressure, forcefully pushing values on to 
developing countries, and showing military strengths are less and 
less likely to be effective.  Policy adjustments are needed in order 
to confirm this trend.  'Quiet diplomacy' which was pledged by the 
EU Foreign Minister and 'smart power' which is being promoted by the 
U.S. Secretary of State are both aimed at advancing their countries' 
and the two major Western economies' own interests.  People hope to 
see less noise, more understanding and communication with each other 
within developed countries' foreign policy." 
 
3. NORTH KOREA 
 
"The U.S. refuses North Korea's advice on peace talks" 
 
The official Communist Party international news publication Global 
Times (Huanqiu Shibao)(01/13)(pg 2): "The U.S. has refused the North 
Korean Foreign Ministry's advice about peace talks, claiming North 
Korea must first fulfill its promise of giving up its nuclear 
programs and then both sides can discuss a peace agreement.  The 
North Korean Ambassador to China said on January 12 that if the U.S. 
disagrees with having negotiations on a peace agreement and removing 
sanctions against North Korea, then North Korea will not rejoin the 
Six-Party Talks.  He also said that those sanctions represent 
prejudice and distrust.  It would be best for both parties to sit 
and have direct talks.  The South Korean media suggest that possibly 
North Korea believes that it would rather ruffle feathers and play 
the peace agreement-card than just obediently return to Six-Party 
Talks negotiations.  As time goes by, the back-and-forth between the 
U.S. and North Korea will intensify even more.  In fact North Korea 
continues its economic construction despite the world's 
speculations.  North Korea's new currency policy is still beginning 
to take shape and its market order has not resumed its previous 
level from before the DPRK implemented the policy." 
 
HUNTSMAN