Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 10AITTAIPEI59, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS; U.S. BEEF

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10AITTAIPEI59.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
10AITTAIPEI59 2010-01-14 09:18 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0059/01 0140918
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 140918Z JAN 10
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3120
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9625
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 1009
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000059 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/P, EAP/PD - THOMAS HAMM 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS; U.S. BEEF 
IMPORTS 
 
1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news 
coverage January 14 on the 7.0-magnitude earthquake that hit Haiti 
Tuesday; on Google's threat to quit China Tuesday; and on the 
year-end five city and county magistrate elections in Taiwan. 
 
2. In terms of editorials and commentaries, a column in the 
KMT-leaning "China Times" discussed China's testing of its missile 
defense system Monday and its connection to U.S.-China-Taiwan 
relations and the Ma administration's cross-Strait policy.  The 
article urged the Ma administration not to keep quiet when it comes 
to issues concerning Taiwan's sovereignty and the Taiwan-centric 
awareness.  A "China Times" column discussed Secretary Clinton's 
remarks on U.S.-China relations made during her flight to Asia.  The 
article said U.S.-China relations will surely "go off the rails" 
because China regards the differences it has with the United States 
as being about its "core interests."  With regard to the U.S. beef 
issue, an op-ed in the pro-independence, English-language "Taipei 
Times" said the beef debacle will teach President Ma a lesson about 
"being humble and listen to the voice of the public."  End summary. 
 
 
3. U.S.-China-Taiwan Relations 
 
A) "The Ma Administration Must Not Surrender Its Right of Speech to 
Others" 
 
Wang Chien-chuang, former president of "China Times," wrote in a 
column in the KMT-leaning "China Times" [circulation: 120,000] 
(1/14): 
 
"... Chinese officials claimed that its anti-missile test [this 
time] was not targeting anyone.  But judging from the fact that the 
People's Liberation Army has never publicized its missile tests and 
yet it was making much ado about it by announcing it to the world 
this time, it is clear to everyone that the move was aimed at the 
U.S. arms sales to Taiwan -- a sure move to 'show its sword' in 
protest [against the U.S. arms sales].  In fact, since Beijing and 
Washington established diplomatic ties in the 1970s, whenever 
Washington decided to sell weapons to Taiwan, Chinese officials have 
always responded to it based on an SOP that has been used for many 
years, to which Washington has long gotten used to.  Yet the extent 
and intensity of China's reaction this time somehow has kept 
Washington on its tenterhooks. 
 
"The reasons are that while no one knows yet how the disturbance 
caused by the U.S. arms sales to Taiwan will end, [U.S. President 
Barack] Obama will soon meet with the Dalai Lama.  Within just one 
month, Washington will have twice stepped on the red line drawn by 
China and encroached upon China's core interests.  [It appears that] 
Washington has made it very clear that it does not care about China 
at all.  Even if Hu Jintao can tolerate that, it will be difficult 
to control the public opinion [in China] which shows mounting 
nationalist sentiment.  Besides, Washington now has a favor to ask 
of China -- it needs China's assistance on issues like North Korea 
and Iran, and when it comes to the U.S. economy, the White House has 
to look upon China for signs of approval. ... 
 
"A friend of mine recently made a thought-provoking observation: 
"The Ma administration said its cross-Strait policy is three No's -- 
no unification, no independence, and no use of force.  But actually 
it is four No's -- 'no talk' should be added.'  No talk about what? 
[Ma] does not talk about any topics that may enrage China, including 
the Tiananmen Square massacre, Liu Xiaobo, [Taiwan's] sovereignty, 
and so on. ...   No matter how many weapons Washington will sell 
Taiwan, it will not change the asymmetrical military buildups on 
both sides of the Strait.  But always responding to [what the other 
side has to say] is a tool that Taiwan must not give up in the 
asymmetrical war of 'saying' across the Taiwan Strait. ..." 
 
B) "China-U.S. Differences Will Surely Go off the Rails" 
 
The "International Lookout" column in the KMT-leaning "China Times" 
[circulation: 120,000] wrote (1/14): 
 
"U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said in response to a 
journalist's enquiry on her flight eastward: 'What I'm expecting is 
that we actually are having a mature relationship, which will be 
consistent with the remarks by the two state leaders in their summit 
about constructing a positive, cooperative and comprehensive 
relationship. That means that it doesn't go off the rails when we 
have differences of opinion.' ...  But such thinking is totally 
different from that of China's.  In Obama's and Clinton's opinion, 
these issues are just different in the ways people perceive them, 
and that both sides can 'seek a common ground while maintaining 
differences' if they are really interested in working with each 
other. ... 
 
"However, for China, it is a totally different story.  Beijing 
IMPORTS 
 
believes that these are all China's 'core interests,' and what 
Washington does will endanger China's core interests.  [For China,] 
bilateral cooperation must not endanger its core interests, and 
since national unification is [one of] its core interests, the 
above-mentioned [differences] have hindered its national 
unification. ..." 
 
4. U.S. Beef Imports 
 
"Beef Debacle Teaches Ma a Lesson" 
 
DPP Legislator Ker Chien-ming opined in the pro-independence, 
English-language "Taipei Times" [circulation: 30,000] (1/14): 
 
"After two months of maneuvers by the ruling and opposition parties, 
the US beef affair has finally been brought to a close. The passage 
of a legal amendment banning imports of certain beef products from 
countries with a history of mad cow disease can be seen as a 
declaration of a new era of independence for the legislature, and a 
strong vote of no confidence in President Ma Ying-jeou.  Ma must 
learn to be humble and listen to the voice of the public instead of 
being blinded by his ever-more-absolute powers. He must realize that 
the US beef issue, and that of the proposed cross-strait economic 
cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), have at least symbolic 
implications for Taiwan's sovereignty, and we cannot allow that to 
be compromised through deals behind closed doors. The US beef affair 
should be a revelation for the Ma administration as it proceeds with 
preparations for an ECFA." 
 
STANTON