VZCZCXRO0885
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #2799/01 3422351
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 082351Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8033
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 0133
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 7783
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 1594
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 4931
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 8290
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 2185
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 8851
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 8301

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 15 TOKYO 002799 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 12/08/09 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) U.S. notifies Japan of postponement of talks to deepen alliance 
relationship agreed at the Hatoyama-Obama summit (Yomiuri) 
 
(2) Futenma airfield relocation: "Relocation to area other than 
Henoko" difficult; U.S. showing no signs of reconsidering (Tokyo 
Shimbun) 
 
(3) Hirano: Japan to inform U.S. of Futenma relocation policy of 
giving priority to reducing Okinawa's burden (Asahi) 
 
(4) GOJ mulls land-based Futenma replacement facility in Camp 
Schwab, dispersion of exercises to Kansai Airport, Kadena Air Base 
(Okinawa Times) 
 
(5) Mayor opposes military use of Kansai Airport in connection with 
Futenma relocation (Asahi) 
 
(6) Parliamentary Secretary of Defense Nagashima voices disagreement 
with opponents of Futenma relocation within Okinawa at symposium 
(Sankei) 
 
(7) MD Kitazawa says USFJ realignment spending to be earmarked in 
FY10 budget under "Prime Minister's account" (Jiji com)  6 
(8) Column: The price of "procrastination" on Futenma relocation 
(Yomiuri) 
 
(9) Dark clouds hanging over Japan-U.S. alliance (Part 1): U.S. 
Ambassador criticizes Hatoyama administration's insincerity 
(Yomiuri) 
 
(10) Poll on Hatoyama cabinet, political parties (Yomiuri) 
 
(11) JAL is a mirror reflecting Japan (Nikkei) 
 
(12) TOP HEADLINES 
 
(13) EDITORIALS 
 
(14) Prime Minister's schedule, December 7 (Nikkei) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) U.S. notifies Japan of postponement of talks to deepen alliance 
relationship agreed at the Hatoyama-Obama summit 
 
YOMIURI ONLINE (Top play) (Slightly abridged) 
Evening, December 8, 2009 
 
It was learned from a government source on Dec. 8 that the U.S. 
government has notified Japan that the new talks aimed at deepening 
the Japan-U.S. alliance on the occasion of the approaching 50th 
anniversary of the revision of the bilateral security treaty will be 
"postponed." 
 
The reason is that the Hatoyama administration intends to review the 
Japan-U.S. agreement on the relocation of the U.S. forces' Futenma 
Air Station even though the U.S. is strongly demanding the 
implementation of the agreement. The talks on deepening the alliance 
are meant to be a symbol of stronger bilateral ties in the future. 
The confusion over the Futenma issue is beginning to undermine the 
 
TOKYO 00002799  002 OF 015 
 
 
overall Japan-U.S. relationship. 
 
According to the above source, the Japanese government was notified 
of the "postponement" after the cabinet level working group meeting 
on Futenma relocation on Dec. 4. The U.S. side reportedly gave the 
following reason: "We will not engage in discussions until the 
Futenma relocation issue is resolved." 
 
The Japanese government informed the U.S. side of its decision to 
defer a conclusion on Futenma relocation to next year at the meeting 
on Dec. 4. It is believed that the U.S. side reacted strongly to 
this. 
 
The government had wanted to launch the talks on the alliance by the 
ministers of foreign affairs and defense with the U.S. before year 
end apart from the Futenma working group, but now, postponement will 
be inevitable. 
 
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama suggested the talks at the Japan-U.S. 
summit meeting on Nov. 13 and President Barack Obama agreed with the 
idea. The plan was to hold discussions for one year until the 
President's next visit to Japan next November. 
 
These talks were expected to produce a new joint declaration 
following the 1996 Joint Declaration on Security. If the Hatoyama 
administration actually defers the Futenma relocation issue, it is 
likely that the drafting of the new joint declaration will be 
difficult. 
 
With the Obama administration adopting a tough stance, coordination 
to realize a Japan-U.S. summit meeting at the 15th Conference of 
Parties to the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP15) 
in Copenhagen, which Hatoyama is seeking, is expected to be 
problematic. 
 
(2) Futenma airfield relocation: "Relocation to area other than 
Henoko" difficult; U.S. showing no signs of reconsidering 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 3) (Almost full) 
December 8, 2009 
 
The Defense Ministry is having difficulty addressing Prime Minister 
Yukio Hatoyama's instructions to find an alternative site for the 
coastal area in Henoko in Nago City stipulated in the existing plan 
for relocating the U.S. Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station (in 
Ginowan City, Okinawa Prefecture). Defense Minister Toshimi Kitazawa 
intends to inspect Guam in an effort to determine whether it is 
possible to relocate the entire facility to the island. However, the 
U.S. is showing no signs of reconsidering the issue. There is a 
strong indication that Kitazawa's inspection plan is only a gesture 
of compromise to appease the Social Democratic Party (SDP), which is 
calling for relocation outside the prefecture or the nation. 
 
The prime minister held talks with Kitazawa and Foreign Minister 
Katsuya Okada at the Prime Minister's Official Residence (the 
Kantei) on Dec. 3. After the meeting, the prime minister approached 
them and said, "Please think of a new site." He thus asked them to 
find a new site to replace Henoko. 
 
Since he called for relocating the Futenma facilities outside the 
prefecture or the nation during the campaign for the August Lower 
House election, the prime minister wants to avoid relocation in 
 
TOKYO 00002799  003 OF 015 
 
 
accordance with the existing plan. The SDP, the Democratic Party of 
Japan's (DPJ) junior coalition party, is increasing its presence. 
The SDP is resisting relocation within the prefecture, hinting at 
bolting from the coalition if that occurs. It called for changing 
the envisaged relocation site, saying, "There is also Iwo-Jima or 
Guam," as Secretary General Yasumasa Shigeno said. 
 
Relocation along with Marines 
 
A senior Defense Ministry official said that the Iwo-Jima proposal 
is out of the question because it is a volcanic island so the ground 
is elevated and unstable. However, Guam will host 8,000 Marines to 
be relocated from Okinawa according to the U.S. military 
restructuring road map, on which Japan and the U.S. have agreed. 
According the Guam plan, the airfield functions will be relocated 
along with Marines. 
 
However, the Futenma Air Station serves as a front-line base. In the 
event of a contingency in the Taiwan Strait or on the Korean 
Peninsula, 300 helicopters will be deployed there. The U.S. military 
wants to keep its foothold in Okinawa intact, because Guam is 
located approximately 2,400 kilometers southeast of Okinawa which 
would be too far from the front line. 
 
Obtaining local residents' approval posing stumbling block 
 
The proposal for using Kansai International Airport made by Osaka 
Governor Toru Hashimoto also lacks feasibility. The airport's 
functions are impeccable. It would also serve as a measure to bail 
out the airport, which is suffering from an operating deficit. 
However, since the relocation requires the building of 
livelihood-related infrastructure, such as housing for families of 
U.S. military servicemen, even if the government is positive about 
hosting the base, the possibility of local residents accepting U.S. 
servicemen is slim. 
 
Names of other deficit-ridden local airports, such as Saga Airport, 
have cropped up as alternative sites. However, no serious 
consideration has been given to them. 
 
Okada's proposal for integrating the Futenma functions into Kadena 
Air Base has also been abandoned as a result of a joint probe with 
the U.S. side. According to the U.S. military, Kadena Air Base would 
not be able to accommodate the facilities in the event of emergency, 
because the size of the U.S. military's operations expands in 
emergency situations. It also noted that it would be difficult to 
operate fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters at the same airfield as 
their flying speeds are different. 
 
Only feasible plan 
 
In any case, there are no signs of the U.S. reconsidering the Henoko 
plan, even if the government comes up with a new proposal. The U.S. 
has opted for the Henoko plan after many years of talks, since it 
reached an agreement with Japan on the reversion of Futenma airfield 
in 1996. U.S. Ambassador to Japan Roos at a meeting of the 
Japan-U.S. ministerial-level working group on the 4th rejected 
alternative plans, seeking a prompt settlement (for the Henoko 
plan). 
 
The U.S. is deepening its distrust in the Hatoyama administration. 
The prime minister at the bilateral summit in November said 
 
TOKYO 00002799  004 OF 015 
 
 
confidently to President Obama, "Trust me." Nevertheless, the 
government and the ruling parties are trying to postpone a decision 
until next year despite U.S. expectations. 
 
The U.S. side at the working group meeting on the 4th, too, rebuked 
Japanese participants, using bitter language, such as that Japan 
made the President lose face. A senior Defense Ministry official 
said, "It will be tough if the U.S. considers it impossible to hold 
talks with the present administration." 
 
On the 7th, SDP leader Mizuho Fukushima said, "If the government 
hastily imposes its decision alone, it will become even more 
difficult to settle the issue." The pressure on the prime minister 
from home and abroad is increasing. 
 
(3) Hirano: Japan to inform U.S. of Futenma relocation policy of 
giving priority to reducing Okinawa's burden 
 
ASAHI ONLINE (Slightly abridged) 
December 8, 2009 
 
At a news conference on Dec. 8, Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi 
Hirano indicated that the government will give priority to measures 
to remove the danger posed by the Futenma base and to reduce the 
burden on the Okinawan people rather than identifying the relocation 
site in dealing with the relocation of the U.S. forces' Futenma Air 
Station (in Ginowan City, Okinawa). If this is agreed upon by a 
meeting among the four concerned ministers, Hirano, Foreign Minister 
Katsuya Okada, Defense Minister Toshimi Kitazawa, and Okinawa 
Affairs Minister Seiji Maehara in the afternoon, it will be conveyed 
to the U.S. side as the cabinet's policy. 
 
In light of the U.S. demand for the early implementation of the 
bilateral agreement to relocate Futenma to Henoko in Nago City, 
Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama has indicated that the U.S. side will 
be notified of the government's policy shortly. However, it is 
unlikely that the U.S. will agree to give priority to discussions on 
reducing Okinawa's burden over the confirmation of the relocation 
site. It is believed that the U.S. is certain to toughen its 
attitude. 
 
Hirano stated at this news conference: "I think the top priority is 
to reduce the burden on the Okinawan people. There is also the 
question of removing danger. The basic premise is that the 
government needs to deal with such issues as the top priority." When 
reporters pointed out that the U.S. side may not agree to reduce the 
burden without first reaching a conclusion on the relocation site, 
he said: "Of course, that is the case from the U.S. point of view. 
That is why it is necessary to negotiate." 
 
(4) GOJ mulls land-based Futenma replacement facility in Camp 
Schwab, dispersion of exercises to Kansai Airport, Kadena Air Base 
 
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 1) (Full) 
December 8, 2009 
 
Tokyo -- It was learned on Dec. 7 that in connection with the 
relocation of the U.S. forces' Futenma Air Station, the government 
is considering a plan to build a land-based helipad inside Camp 
Schwab to accommodate the move of Futenma's helicopter units there, 
disperse the exercises of fixed-wing aircraft to Kadena Air Base 
(KAB) and Kansai International Airport, and spread out other 
 
TOKYO 00002799  005 OF 015 
 
 
functions of the Futenma base. Coordination is taking place between 
the cabinet and the ruling parties. There is opposition from Okinawa 
and within the ruling parties to the current plan to relocate 
Futenma to Henoko, while the U.S. side is demanding the 
implementation of the Japan-U.S. agreement. The government is 
seeking to find a solution by dispersing Futenma's functions, 
including the relocation of certain units to existing U.S. bases. 
 
Meanwhile, the transfer of exercises by the F-15s based at KAB and 
by non-Okinawa based aircraft to the Kansai Airport is being 
considered as a measure to reduce the burden on Okinawa. The 
possibility of relocating some F-15 units from KAB to the U.S. 
forces' Misawa base (in Aomori Prefecture) is also being studied. A 
ruling party source says: "Reducing the burden imposed by KAB first 
is being studied apart from the relocation of Futenma's functions." 
 
Coordination between Osaka Governor Toru Hashimoto and the central 
government has already begun on the dispersion of exercises to 
Kansai Airport. According to the above ruling party source, 
Hashimoto has indicated his readiness to accept the proposal when 
the political conditions are ripe. Hashimoto has been saying so far 
that he is "willing to discuss the issue if presented with a formal 
proposal from the government" and that Okinawa's share of the burden 
imposed by military bases should be shouldered by the whole 
country. 
 
The problem with this plan for the dispersed relocation of the 
Futenma base is how to obtain the understanding of the Okinawan 
people, including Governor Hirokazu Nakaima and the local leaders, 
and the Social Democratic Party and the People's New Party, which 
are opposed to the existing relocation plan. 
 
The key question is whether the U.S. side will accept the dispersed 
relocation plan, since it has been demanding at the bilateral 
cabinet-level working group and other meetings that Japan make a 
decision based on the original Japan-U.S. agreement before the end 
of 2009. Certain government officials think that "it might be easy 
to obtain the U.S. side's understanding." 
 
There are also moves on the Japanese side to look into the 
possibility of transferring certain functions of KAB to U.S. 
military facilities in Guam in order to reduce Okinawa's burden. 
Discussions between the two countries, taking into account the 
operations of the U.S. Air Force and Marines in Guam, are likely to 
take place. 
 
(5) Mayor opposes military use of Kansai Airport in connection with 
Futenma relocation 
 
ASAHI ONLINE (Full) 
December 8, 2009 
 
In connection with the relocation of the U.S. forces' Futenma Air 
Station (in Ginowan City, Okinawa), Osaka Governor Toru Hashimoto 
has said that he "will not refuse" to discuss the possibility of 
Futenma's relocation to Kansai International Airport. Mayor 
Michihiko Mukai of Sennan City, where the airport is located, said 
in his response to general interpellation at the city assembly on 
Dec. 8: "Military use has not been envisioned from the very 
beginning. Personally, I have never thought about such an idea. I 
oppose both the military use (of the airport) and turning it into a 
military base." 
 
TOKYO 00002799  006 OF 015 
 
 
 
(6) Parliamentary Secretary of Defense Nagashima voices disagreement 
with opponents of Futenma relocation within Okinawa at symposium 
 
SANKEI ONLINE (Full) 
13:08, December 8, 2009 
 
At a symposium in Tokyo (Nikkei-CSIS Symposium on "The Obama 
Administration's Asian Policy and the Japan-U.S. Relationship in the 
New Era") on the morning of Dec. 8, Parliamentary Secretary of 
Defense Akihisa Nagashima discussed the relocation of the U.S. 
forces' Futenma Air Station (in Ginowan City, Okinawa), saying: "The 
argument that an unwelcome facility should be moved somewhere else 
is prevalent, without discussing the extent of the U.S.'s share in 
the risks during a contingency in Japan." He thus expressed his 
disagreement with the Social Democratic Party and other opponents of 
Futenma's relocation within Okinawa. 
 
Nagashima pointed out that the Japan-U.S. alliance "is founded on a 
balance between the risks the United States takes in a contingency 
and the cost borne by Japan during peacetime." He emphasized that 
"if Japan wants to reduce the cost (i.e. U.S. military bases) in 
peacetime, including the burden on the people of Okinawa, it will 
have to gradually take over the risks in a contingency. Otherwise, 
the balance cannot be maintained." 
 
(7) MD Kitazawa says USFJ realignment spending to be earmarked in 
FY10 budget under "Prime Minister's account" 
 
JIJI.COM (Full) 
13:02, December 8, 2009 
 
At a news conference on the morning of Dec. 8, Defense Minister 
Toshimi Kitazawa said that with regard to how to handle the 
expenditures relating to U.S. Forces Japan (USFJ) realignment in the 
FY2010 budget, "since various issues will arise, our thinking is to 
use the 'Prime Minister's account,' and I have obtained Prime 
Minister Yukio Hatoyama's approval for this." He stated that the 
budget will be earmarked from the standpoint of maintaining the 
relationship of trust with the U.S. 
 
The Ministry of Defense has included a total of 89 billion yen for 
USFJ realignment projects, including the relocation of the U.S. 
forces' Futenma Air Station (in Ginowan City, Okinawa), in its 
budget requests for FY2010. 
 
(8) Column: The price of "procrastination" on Futenma relocation 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full) 
December 8, 2009 
 
Mayor Tokujitsu Miyagi of the town of Kadena in Okinawa, home to the 
largest U.S. Air Force base in the Far East, Kadena Air Base (KAB), 
terms the "Kadena integration plan" - which calls for the relocation 
of the U.S. Marines' Futenma Air Station (in Ginowan City, Okinawa) 
to the KAB - a "ghost." "It keeps coming back even after you bust 
it." 
 
An agreement was reached in 2006 between Japan and the United States 
to relocate the Futenma base to the coastal area of Camp Schwab (in 
Nago City) in northern Okinawa. However, in the recent House of 
Representatives election in August, candidates of the ruling 
 
TOKYO 00002799  007 OF 015 
 
 
coalition parties advocating relocation out of Okinawa won in all 
the single-seat districts in Okinawa. There has been a renewed surge 
in the expectations of local residents for relocation out of 
Okinawa. 
 
The Hatoyama administration says that it is reviewing the 2006 
Japan-U.S. agreement. At a news conference on Oct. 23, Foreign 
Minister Katsuya Okada announced that the Kadena integration plan is 
one of the options. 
 
(Okada's reasoning:) While both the Marines, which use mostly 
helicopters, and the Air Force, which uses fighters, are reluctant 
about joint operations, the beauty of this plan is that it does not 
require the reclamation of land and will utilize a large tract of 
land measuring 2,000 hectares. There is surely room for 
negotiations. 
 
Mikio Shimoji, People's New Party policy chief (first district of 
Okinawa), has been a proponent of the Kadena integration plan. This 
plan that was rejected in the past was put on the Japan-U.S. 
negotiation agenda once again. 
 
When Miyagi heard about what Okada said at the news conference, he 
said: "This is utter nonsense. (The proposal) should be thrashed 
immediately." He ordered town officials to prepare to hold a rally 
of the town people against the proposal. 
 
This was the third time the "ghost" had made an appearance. 
 
The first time was at the Special Action Committee on Okinawa (SACO) 
set up by the Japanese and U.S. governments in 1996. At that time, 
the mayors of the three municipalities adjacent to the KAB formed a 
trilateral liaison council and opposed the proposal fiercely. As a 
result, this plan was not included in the SACO final report, and a 
site "on the east coast of the main island of Okinawa" was chosen as 
Futenma's relocation site. 
 
The second time was in 2004, after a helicopter that took off from 
the Futenma base crashed onto the campus of the Okinawa 
International University nearby. The U.S. side looked into the 
feasibility of the Kadena integration plan after this major 
accident, but the local communities again rose in unity against the 
plan, resulting in it being scrapped. 
 
Miyagi has been the mayor of Kadena for 19 years. He has given his 
support to two conservative governors in a row, Keiichi Inamine and 
Hirokazu Nakaima, who approve of Futenma's relocation within the 
prefecture. However, as the town mayor, there is one thing that is 
absolutely unacceptable to him, the Kadena integration plan. Some 
2,500 people (according to the organizers) attended the mass rally 
on Nov. 7, which added momentum to the prefecture-wide rally 
demanding relocation out of Okinawa on the next day. This was the 
third time that the anger of the Okinawan people, who have endured 
the burden imposed by the bases, exploded. 
 
Miyagi confronted Okada, who was visiting Okinawa, at the town 
office on Nov. 16. He stated in very strong terms: 
 
"If the starting point of the Futenma relocation issue is the danger 
it poses, the KAB is 10 times more dangerous than Futenma." He cited 
an incident 50 years ago where a fighter crashed onto an elementary 
school near the base, killing 11 school children, and gave an 
 
TOKYO 00002799  008 OF 015 
 
 
account of the town's tragic history. Okada was dumbfounded. 
 
In the end, Okada gave up on the Kadena integration plan. However, 
the price of the procrastination is high. Backed by public opinion 
in Okinawa, the SDP, which is opposed to the existing relocation 
plan, is threatening to bolt the coalition government. Above all, it 
is demanding relocation out of Okinawa, which is not feasible. The 
rekindled hopes of the Okinawan people will not be easy to 
extinguish. 
 
If a solution is not found on the relocation issue before the end of 
the year, the Nago mayoral election in January will begin to 
strongly resemble a referendum on Futenma relocation. Miyagi is 
furious that the Hatoyama administration is repeating the history of 
dumping an issue of national policy on the 60,000 citizens of Nago 
after its prolonged procrastination. 
 
He said: "The job of the top leader of the country is to take risks 
and make decisions on security issues. I would not be thinking about 
the national interest even if I were made to decide such issues. I 
would be thinking only about the mission of protecting the 
livelihood of the people who live here." 
 
(9) Dark clouds hanging over Japan-U.S. alliance (Part 1): U.S. 
Ambassador criticizes Hatoyama administration's insincerity 
 
YOMIURI (Page 1) (Full) 
December 5, 2009 
 
In a meeting of the Japan-U.S. cabinet-level working group on Dec. 
4, U.S. Ambassador to Japan John Roos said after both sides 
expressed their frank views: "I would like to discuss the matter 
among only the three of us." Monopolizing the discussion, the 
Ambassador explained to Foreign Minister Katsuya Okada and Defense 
Minister Toshimi Kitazawa how the Hatoyama administration's 
insincere policy has disgraced President Barack Obama. The strong 
tone of the Ambassador, who supported President Obama both 
materially and spiritually in the presidential election campaign 
last year, indisputably represents the irritation of President 
Obama. 
 
The U.S. government has continued to call on the Hatoyama 
administration through various routes to reach an early decision on 
the relocation of a U.S. military facility to the Henoko district, 
as agreed on between Japan and the U.S. in 2006. The U.S. side 
defined the existing plan as the sole option, while Prime Minister 
Yukio Hatoyama told Obama in their meeting on Nov. 13 that he would 
come up with an early conclusion, saying, "Trust me." Hatoyama, 
however, instructed concerned officials early this month to put the 
existing plan back to square one, in effect. 
 
A senior Foreign Ministry official moaned: "The U.S. may deem the 
prime minister a leader who is anti-U.S. and does not understand the 
significance of the Japan-U.S. alliance." In actuality, a senior 
U.S. government official said at a meeting of the working group in 
Washington on Nov. 24: "Now nobody trusts the prime minister." 
 
Despite such severe remarks, why has Hatoyama been negative about 
implementing the existing agreement? 
 
A close aide to Hatoyama pointed out that Japan Research Institute 
Chairman Jitsuro Terashima, a personal advisor on foreign affairs to 
 
TOKYO 00002799  009 OF 015 
 
 
Hatoyama, exerted a strong influence over Hatoyama's approach to the 
Futenma issue. Terashima visited Washington this week and told 
several Japan experts: "As an independent state, Japan should reduce 
the U.S. military presence in the nation to two-thirds of the 
current level." 
 
An aide to Hatoyama commented: "On this issue, the prime minister 
and Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirofumi Hirano share Mr. Terashima's 
views." Hatoyama has long asserted that U.S. military troops should 
be stationed in Japan only in times of emergency. When one aide to 
Hatoyama pointed out the strategic ineffectiveness of Hatoyama's 
stock argument, Hirano replied: "You do not understand the meaning 
of the change of government. Japan and the U.S. should have an equal 
partnership." 
 
Within the U.S. government, which has carefully monitored moves by 
the Hatoyama administration, an increasing number of officials have 
begun to suspect, as indicated by a Defense Department source, that 
"the prime minister might be hoping to see the withdrawal of the 
Marines. Marines stationed in Okinawa are the U.S. military's 
forward deployment forces in the Western Pacific region. Satoshi 
Morimoto, professor at Takushoku University, said, "A withdrawal 
would be tantamount to the end of the Japan-U.S. alliance." This 
view is shared by many experts. 
 
State Minister for Okinawa, Northern Territories, and Disaster 
Prevention Seiji Maehara stressed the need for an early settlement 
(of the Futenma issue) in a press conference on Dec. 4, remarking: 
"If a helicopter crashes in an urban district and causes serious 
damage while the Futenma issue is still up in the air, it will 
become impossible for U.S. military bases to remain in Okinawa. In 
such a case, the Japan-U.S. security arrangements themselves will be 
undermined." Is Hatoyama going to change the nature of the 
Japan-U.S. alliance? If he is thinking of Futenma as a symbol of 
such an effort, it is the worst scenario, one that makes light of 
the Okinawan people's pain. 
 
(10) Poll on Hatoyama cabinet, political parties 
 
YOMIURI (Page 8) (Full) 
December 8, 2009 
 
Questions & Answers 
(Figures are percentages) 
 
Q: Do you support the Hatoyama cabinet? 
 
Yes 59 
No 29 
Other answers (O/A) 5 
No answer (N/A) 7 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the foregoing question) 
Pick only one from among the following reasons for your approval of 
the Hatoyama cabinet. 
 
Something can be expected of its policy measures 27 
The prime minister is aiming to make policy decisions at the 
initiative of politicians 26 
The prime minister has leadership ability 3 
There's something stable about the prime minister 3 
His cabinet's lineup is good 4 
 
TOKYO 00002799  010 OF 015 
 
 
Because it's a non-Liberal Democratic Party government 35 
O/A 0 
N/A 2 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the foregoing question) Pick 
only one from among the following reasons for your disapproval of 
the Hatoyama cabinet. 
 
Nothing can be expected of its policy measures 27 
Nothing can be expected of its policy decisions made at the 
initiative of politicians 16 
The prime minister lacks leadership ability 27 
There's nothing stable about the prime minister 12 
His cabinet's lineup is not good 6 
Because it's a non-Liberal Democratic Party government 7 
O/A -- 
N/A 5 
 
Q: Which political party do you support now? Pick only one. 
 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 42 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP or Jiminto) 19 
New Komeito (NK) 2 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 3 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 2 
Your Party (YP or Minna no To) 1 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0 
Reform Club (RC or Kaikaku Kurabu) -- 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) -- 
Other political parties -- 
None 29 
N/A 2 
 
Q: Do you think the DPJ should never fail to act up to what it 
incorporated in its manifesto for this summer's election for the 
House of Representatives, or do you think it cannot be helped if the 
DPJ cannot do so depending on circumstances, or do you think the DPJ 
does not necessarily have to stick to its manifesto? 
 
The DPJ should never fail to act up to its manifesto 18 
It can't be helped if the DPJ cannot 46 
The DPJ does not necessarily have to do so 34 
N/A 3 
 
Q: What do you think about the following three policies the DPJ 
incorporated in its manifesto for this summer's election for the 
House of Representatives? 
 
(A) Do you think the Hatoyama cabinet should carry out its policy of 
providing child allowance handouts as pledged, or do you think the 
Hatoyama cabinet should review this policy and then carry it out, or 
do you otherwise think the Hatoyama cabinet should not carry it 
out? 
 
(B) What about the DPJ's policy of making the nation's expressways 
toll-free? 
 
(C) What about the DPJ's policy of abolishing gasoline and other 
road-related provisional tax rates? 
 
 (A) (B) (C) 
Carry it out as pledged 27 12 36 
 
TOKYO 00002799  011 OF 015 
 
 
Review and carry it out 54 37 32 
Should not carry it out 16 48 21 
N/A 3 2 11 
 
 
Q: The Government Revitalization Unit under the Hatoyama cabinet 
screened budget requests from all government ministries and agencies 
to make such judgments as abolition and reduction. Do you approve of 
this budget screening? 
 
Yes 71 
No 20 
N/A 9 
 
Q: Is there anything you think is problematical about the process of 
screening budget requests? 
 
Yes 63 
No 22 
N/A 15 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the foregoing question) 
What do you think is the biggest problem? Pick only one. 
 
Budget requests screened were irrelevant 17 
Budget screening team didn't spend enough time 39 
Budget screening team's judgment was wrong 17 
Budget screening team's discussion process was not good 20 
O/A 1 
N/A 6 
 
Q: What do you think about the pending issue of relocating the U.S. 
Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station in Okinawa Prefecture? 
 
It would be better to relocate the airfield in line with the 
agreement reached between the Japanese and U.S. governments 26 
It would be better to slightly modify the relocation plan 32 
It would be better to overhaul the relocation plan 26 
N/A 16 
 
 
Q: Do you think the Hatoyama cabinet is dealing appropriately with 
the current state of the nation's economy, such as the deflation and 
the high yen? 
 
Yes 20 
No 68 
N/A 12 
 
Q: Do you think Prime Minister Hatoyama has sufficiently accounted 
for his own politics-and-money problems, such as his fund-managing 
body's falsification of reports on political donations? 
 
Yes 10 
No 85 
N/A 5 
 
Q: Do you think that Prime Minister Hatoyama, if his secretary is 
prosecuted over the falsification of political fund reports, should 
resign to take responsibility? 
 
Yes 37 
 
TOKYO 00002799  012 OF 015 
 
 
No 54 
N/A 9 
 
Polling methodology: The survey was conducted Dec. 4-6 across the 
nation on a computer-aided random digit dialing (RDD) basis. 
Households with one or more eligible voters totaled 1,723. Valid 
answers were obtained from 1,092 persons (61 PERCENT ). 
 
(Note) In some cases, the total percentage does not add up to 100 
PERCENT  due to rounding. 0 indicates that the figure was less than 
0.5. "--" denotes that no respondents answered. 
 
(11) JAL is a mirror reflecting Japan 
 
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Excerpts) 
December 8, 2009 
 
Mikio Sugano 
 
It is already December, and people are talking about this year's 
buzzwords and hit products. When I think of high-profile companies 
of the year 2009, the name of Japan Airlines (JAL), now in a 
financial crisis, comes to mind first. The company posted a record 
loss of 130 billion dollars in the 2009 April-September period. A 
team of experts under Minister of Land, Infrastructure, and 
Transport (MLIT) Seiji Maehara that assessed JAL's assets 
acknowledged that the company is effectively insolvent. 
 
The company has suffered a plunge in its stock price and is having 
difficulty raising funds. Even after the establishment of the 
Hatoyama cabinet, bargaining has been going on over JAL's additional 
efforts for corporate restructuring, the government's official 
assistance, and bridge loans by a group of banks. 
 
The airline's financial position was aggravated further by a delay 
in efforts to improve its high-cost structure. An analyst 
well-versed in the transport industry ascribed JAL's crisis to 
aviation administration. Administration that has forced unprofitable 
routes onto JAL and kept the regulations in place is also to blame. 
 
The question of pension benefits for JAL retirees is also 
noteworthy. Many retirees are opposed to a plan to squeeze the 
pension liabilities by substantially curbing the benefits that are 
premised on the corporate pension program guaranteeing an interest 
rate of 4.5 percent. The government's position is that even if 
public funds are injected into JAL, it will not allow the airline to 
use the money for its pension program. 
 
A plan is also being floated to enact special legislation to reduce 
JAL's pension benefits. 
 
JAL and the Japanese government have many things in common. 
 
First, both have loss-prone natures and are deeply in debt. The 
country's fiscal deficit is projected to swell to about 10 percent 
of GDP at the end of 2009. The government's liabilities are also 
expected to grow to nearly twice the GDP. There are no prospects for 
improvement in sight. 
 
The high-profile screenings of state projects have failed to come up 
with enough funding for a child allowance plan and other programs 
promised by the Democratic Party of Japan. Tax revenues have also 
 
TOKYO 00002799  013 OF 015 
 
 
sharply dropped. The situation is similar to JAL, which has failed 
to cut costs swiftly and is suffering from a decline in passenger 
income. 
 
Their pension programs share some similarities as well. In its 
long-term fiscal outlook presented in February, the Health, Labor, 
and Welfare Ministry set the yield on the pension fund reserves at 
4.1 percent, higher than the 3.2 percent projected five years ago. 
The premise was set higher so that the level of pension benefits 
will not decline in the future. So the government cannot make fun of 
JAL's 4.5 percent. 
 
Due to its labor-cost reduction efforts, JAL now reportedly has 
contract employees who make less than 2 million yen a year. At the 
same time, its retirees receiving pension benefits amounting to 
several million yen annually are putting up stiff resistance to 
reducing their benefits. This also looks like the near-future 
picture of the public pension system that is designed for the 
current working generation to support the retired generation. 
 
The more the lawmakers postpone the reform of the pension system in 
a bid to please the older generation with a growing voice, the more 
the bill to be footed by future generations will rise. JAL is void 
of a strategy to survive against international competition and lacks 
strong leadership. The same is true with the Hatoyama 
administration. JAL is a mirror reflecting Japan. 
 
"JAL covers a shortage of operational cash flows with loans. The 
government's pattern is the same as JAL's," said Kazuhiko Toyama, a 
member of the MLIT's experts' team. 
 
We do not want to see the government share the same fate as JAL as a 
result of failing to reform itself. 
 
(12) TOP HEADLINES 
 
Asahi: 
Transport minister eyes U.S. and Europe-bound flights from Haneda 
airport in daytime; some highways in Honshu to be made toll free 
 
Mainichi: Nikkei: Tokyo Shimbun: 
Government to add 100 billion yen to economic pump-priming measures, 
accepting People's New Party's proposal: Increase in issuance of 
government bonds eyed; 100 billion yen added for 
local-government-sponsored public works 
 
Yomiuri: 
Prime minister to tell U.S. President of plan to put off decision on 
Futenma airfield relocation at COP15 meeting 
 
Sankei: 
Analysis of Democratic Party of Japan: Japan is becoming like Iwate 
Prefecture 
 
Akahata: 
Tax on 23 items to be boosted; government plans to abolish deduction 
for dependents 
 
(13) EDITORIALS 
 
Asahi: 
(1) Reform of petition-filing system: Concern about administration's 
 
TOKYO 00002799  014 OF 015 
 
 
decision-making becoming bipolarized between government and ruling 
parties 
(2) Information gathering satellites: Is this all right to press 
ahead with present development plan 
 
Mainichi: 
(1) U.S.-North Korea talks: Aim at eliminating nuclear arms 
(2) Survey on family life: Create environment where women can have 
children free from anxiety 
 
Yomiuri: 
(1) Free high school education: Switch to providing assistance to 
people in low-income bracket 
(2) Ryo Ishikawa becomes youngest-ever money-title winner: We look 
forward to his soaring to even greater heights 
 
Nikkei: 
(1) Crisis of free trade evident in drifting WTO talks 
(2) Although Supreme Court throws out guilty verdict handed down to 
three management personnel of former Nippon Credit Bank (now Aozora 
Bank) for window-dressing accounting, they are still responsible for 
sloppy management 
 
Sankei: 
(1) Futenma Air Station relocation issue: Foreign Minister should be 
ready to quit if he fails to persuade Prime Minister to reach quick 
decision 
(2) COP15 starts: Agreement that will lead to new protocol urged 
 
Tokyo Shimbun: 
(1) COP15 starts: Aim for higher goals and implement them in a more 
steady manner 
(2) Denomination by North Korea: Has a bud for reform and 
liberalization disappeared? 
 
Akahata: 
(1) Today marks the 68 anniversary of the outbreak of the Pacific 
War 
 
(14) Prime Minister's schedule, December 7 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
December 8, 2009 
 
09:25 Presented a letter of appointment to the National Public 
Safety Committee (NPS) to former Japan Trade Union Confederation 
president Tsuyoshi Takagi at the Prime Minister's Official Residence 
(Kantei), with NPS Chairman Nakai present. 
10:03 Met World Bank Governor Zoellick, with Deputy Chief Cabinet 
Secretary Matsuno and others present. Later met National Strategy 
Minister Kan. 
11:02 Met the incoming and outgoing Central Readiness Command heads, 
Toshinobu Miyajima and Mikio Shibata, with Defense Parliamentary 
Secretary Nagashima present. Followed by incoming and outgoing 
chairmen on the Japanese side of the Japan-U.S. Business Council 
Hiromasa Yonekura and Junichi Ujike. 
12:17 Met Kan and Chief Cabinet Secretary Hirano. 
13:03 Met former Soviet Union President Gorbachev, with Lower House 
Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Suzuki present. 
14:15 Met Assistant Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Fukuda. Followed 
by Foreign Minister Okada, Defense Minister Kitazawa, Transport 
Minister Maehara, and Hirano. Kitazawa stayed behind. 
 
TOKYO 00002799  015 OF 015 
 
 
16:42 Met JR Tokai President Noriyuki Kasai, former Defense 
Secretary of State Armitage, Confederation of Indian Industry Chief 
Tarun Das, and others. 
17:24 Met Cuban Foreign Minister Rodriguez. Later met Japan-South 
Korea Cooperation Committee Chairman Nam, former South Korean prime 
minister, on the South Korean side, Chairman Nakasone, former prime 
minister, on the Japanese side, and others. Posed for photos with 
Nam and others. 
18:28 Met Kitazawa. 
19:03 Dined with Matsuno and Lower House member Hirofumi Ryu at an 
Italian restaurant in the Hotel New Otani. 
21:04 Arrived at his official residential quarters. 
 
ROOS