Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09KINGSTON1142, Jamaica: J1 Validation Study Shows Good Usage and Returns

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09KINGSTON1142.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09KINGSTON1142 2009-12-21 16:12 2011-06-13 09:30 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Kingston
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKG #1142/01 3551613
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 211612Z DEC 09
FM AMEMBASSY KINGSTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0437
INFO RUEHBH/AMEMBASSY NASSAU
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS
RUEHDG/AMEMBASSY SANTO DOMINGO
RUEHKG/AMEMBASSY KINGSTON
RUEHPU/AMEMBASSY PORT AU PRINCE
RUEHWN/AMEMBASSY BRIDGETOWN
UNCLAS KINGSTON 001142 
 
SIPDIS 
DEPT FOR CA/FPP 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: CVIS SMIG KFRD OEXC JM
SUBJECT: Jamaica: J1 Validation Study Shows Good Usage and Returns 
 
1. (U) SUMMARY: U.S. Embassy Kingston's Fraud Prevention Unit 
conducted a validation study on Jamaican J1 applicants who received 
J1 visas between May and August 2009.  In our study, we 
concentrated on summer work and travel students, who make up the 
majority of J1 applicants seen at Embassy Kingston.  The results of 
our study show that the J1 summer work and travel program is viable 
and generally very well-used by Jamaican post-secondary students. 
Based on the study, and the results, we plan to target audiences 
for outreach to ensure that the program continues to be a 
successful tool for Jamaican students to participate in a cultural 
exchange. 
 
A Popular Choice: Summer Work and Travel 
 
2. (U) The majority of J1 applicants seen at U.S. Embassy Kingston 
are summer work and travel participants, who are enrolled in 
post-secondary institutions in Jamaica.  In calendar year 2009, 
Kingston has issued 3,356 J1 visas and refused 568, representing a 
J1 refusal rate of 14 percent in this category.  [Comment: In 
calendar year 2009, refusal rates for B1 B2 visas were 
approximately 50 percent.  End Comment.]  For Jamaican 
post-secondary students, the summer work and travel program is 
well-marketed and supported by all of the major universities. 
Though Embassy Kingston sees a variety of courses of study for J1 
applicants, a large number are majoring in hospitality or catering. 
In 2009, some applicants were refused because their institutions 
were determined to be vocational schools, which did not meet FAM 
requirements for the J1 program.  Overall, however, the J1 category 
sees a low rate of refusals at this post and includes many repeat 
participants. 
 
Representing Jamaica: Sample Details 
 
3. (U) Using Fraud Prevention Program (FPP) guidance, Kingston 
randomly selected a sample of 800 J1 visa issuances and submitted 
them for arrival and departure checks.  After receiving results, 
Kingston removed any J1 interns or trainees, who were travelling on 
one-year programs, as well as students who were unable or chose not 
to travel after being issued a visa.  The total workable sample 
size was 702 Jamaican applicants.  The sample included 263 males 
and 439 females.  Our sample included students from 25 universities 
and post-secondary education schools, representing almost all such 
institutions in Jamaica.  Within the sample set, 79 applicants (11 
percent) had existing B1 B2 visas, and 136 applicants (19 percent) 
had previously participated in the J1 program. 
 
Context of Results 
 
4. (U) To establish baselines for good and bad, or timely and 
untimely travel, the Kingston Fraud Prevention Unit queried 
universities and post-secondary institutions regarding start dates 
for the 2009 fall semester.  We selected a uniform return date 
based on the school with the latest start date.  [Comment: 
Excelsior Community College and GC Foster Community College had 
start dates of September 14, 2009, though the most populated 
universities resumed classes in August.  A one-week buffer was 
added to the latest start date to accommodate potential travel 
delays, as well as to acknowledge that many post-secondary 
institutions in Jamaica use the first week of classes for purely 
administrative activities.  End Comment.]  Using this process, we 
determined that "good" travel would involve the student returning 
on or before September 20, 2009. 
 
5. (U) Bad travel was reclassified to better categorize our 
results: we identified applicants, who returned after the start 
date of classes as 'untimely' travel and specified in which month 
they returned.  Lastly, students whose return could not be 
confirmed through follow-up calls or electronic records were 
labeled as inconclusive. 
 
The Verdict Is: Great! 
 
6. (U) Results show that virtually every J1 summer work and travel 
program participant returned to Jamaica.  Specifically, only one 
student applied to adjust status in the U.S. and only 13 students 
(2 percent) were labeled as inconclusive as their return could not 
be confirmed through follow-up calls, emails, or through their 
post-secondary institution's registrar. 
 
---------- 
 
Results Summary 
 
Good travel (returning on or before Sep. 20, 2009): 567 applicants, 
 
81 percent of sample 
 
Untimely travel (Total): 121 applicants, 17 percent of sample 
 
-Returning between Sep. 21, 2009 and Sep. 30, 2009: 80 applicants 
 
-Returning between Oct.1, 2009 and Oct. 31, 2009: 35 applicants 
 
-Returning between Nov. 1, 2009 and Nov. 30, 2009: 6 applicants 
 
Adjusted status: 1 applicant 
 
 
Inconclusive: 13 applicants, 2 percent of sample 
 
---------- 
 
7. (U) Further analysis shows that applicants with existing B1 B2 
visas (79 applicants, 11 percent percent of workable sample) were 
not more likely to have a timely return than any other 
participants; in fact, 60 applicants who have existing B1 B2 visas 
returned timely and 15 applicants with B1 B2 visas did not.  As 
such, having a B1 B2 visa is not in and of itself a reason to 
assume that the applicant will return prior to the start of 
classes; we could not confirm a return to Jamaica for two J1 
holders that also had B1 B2 visas. 
 
8. (U) In regards to previous participants, we found that 136 
applicants or 19 percent percent were previously issued a J1 visa 
and those applicants did tend to travel well on their second year 
with the program.  Specifically, 80 percent of repeat participants 
returned in a timely fashion, mirroring the travel pattern of the 
sample group as a whole.  Nevertheless, four repeat J1 holders did 
not have a confirmed return to Jamaica. 
 
Understanding Results and Making improvements 
 
9. (U) We concluded that the delayed returns (those after the start 
of classes) may most likely be a result of a lack of outreach and 
education on the visa requirements.  Embassy Kingston plans to 
address this issue by engaging in outreach to students and 
administrators at post-secondary institutions, as well as local 
agents arranging program participation for students.  Specifically, 
Embassy Kingston plans to target the students at those schools, 
whose rates of untimely returns were the highest. 
 
Troubling Trends: Individual Stories of Program Difficulties 
 
10. (U) During the course of follow-up, Embassy Kingston 
interviewed several students to determine if they experienced any 
difficulties on the program, which relate to Wilberforce Act 
protections and rights.  We found at least two instances of 
students that had problems receiving a Social Security Number (SSN) 
and their salary payments.  In fact, one student stated that he was 
assigned a restaurant location the day before he departed Jamaica, 
that he resided with his employer, and that his employer paid him 
with a "loan" since his SSN was not set up.  The student advised 
that his sponsoring agent, the Ukraine Foundation, provided little 
to no assistance with obtaining a SSN or his salary.  Based on 
these findings, which may or may not be representative of the 
majority of program participants, Embassy Kingston plans to 
emphasize Wilberforce Act protections during planned outreach and 
during upcoming interviews in 2010. 
 
11. (U) CONCLUSION: The J1 visa, particularly the summer work and 
travel program, is an excellent diplomatic tool for Jamaica. 
Results from a sample of 2009 J1 summer work and travel 
participants shows that virtually all Jamaican students abide by 
the terms of their visas and return to Jamaica in a fairly timely 
manner.  Embassy Kingston plans to address untimely returns, those 
after the start of classes, as well as provide information on the 
Wilberforce Act rights and protections through targeted outreach 
activities in advance of the 2010 season. 
Parnell