Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BRUSSELS1701, EUROPEAN COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER AFRICAN URANIUM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BRUSSELS1701.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BRUSSELS1701 2009-12-18 16:43 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY USEU Brussels
VZCZCXRO0574
PP RUEHIK
DE RUEHBS #1701 3521643
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 181643Z DEC 09
FM USEU BRUSSELS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHWD/AMEMBASSY WINDHOEK PRIORITY
RUEHFN/AMEMBASSY FREETOWN PRIORITY
RUEHNM/AMEMBASSY NIAMEY PRIORITY
RUEHKI/AMEMBASSY KINSHASA PRIORITY
RUEHLC/AMEMBASSY LIBREVILLE PRIORITY
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA PRIORITY
RUEHDE/IRAN RPO DUBAI PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/HQ USAFRICOM STUTTGART GE PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS BRUSSELS 001701 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: IR KNNP MNUC PARM EUN
SUBJECT: EUROPEAN COMMISSION WILL CONSIDER AFRICAN URANIUM 
MINE SECURITY PROJECTS 
 
REF: A. STATE 128756 
     B. 08 STATE 130622 
 
1.  (SBU)  On December 18, poloff delivered REF A non-paper 
and demarche to Lars-Gunnar Wigemark, Head of the Security 
Policy Unit in the External Relations Directorate of the 
European Commission.  Poloff emphasized that as part of our 
engagement with the European Union to deny Iran the means to 
enrich uranium, the USG would like to work with the European 
Commission to secure uranium mines in key African countries 
such as Namibia, Sierra Leone, Niger, Gabon, the DRC, and 
South Africa.  In particular, the U.S. would like to invite 
the Commission to send experts to a mid-January 2010 mine 
security assessment in Namibia. 
 
2.  (SBU)  Wigemark said the Commission would examine the 
proposal and respond formally as soon as possible. 
Commenting that the Commission has been looking to expand its 
non-proliferation activities in Africa under the Instrument 
for Stability (REF B), he promised to communicate with the 
Development Directorate-General and AIDCO, which administers 
the Instrument for Stability. 
 
3.  (SBU)  Wigemark said the Commission is unlikely to have 
sufficient travel funds to support involvement in the January 
assessment.  He suggested that if, in fact, Commission 
officials are unable to participate, the U.S. should provide 
a post-assessment briefing to the Commission delegation in 
Windhoek and to Commission officials in Brussels.  He said 
such a briefing would allow the EU to make an informed 
decision about providing funding.  Wigemark noted that while 
a funding decision would be made in Brussels, Commission 
delegations in Africa have considerable influence over 
development project decisions in African countries. 
 
KENNARD 
.