VZCZCXRO8215
RR RUEHIK
DE RUEHRH #1467/01 3080416
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 040416Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY RIYADH
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1841
RUEHJI/AMCONSUL JEDDAH 0406
RUEHZM/GULF COOPERATION COUNCIL COLLECTIVE
RUCNISL/ISLAMIC COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 RIYADH 001467 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR NEA/PPD (DBENZE, PAGNEW); INR/R/MR; INR/NESA, RRU-NEA; 
NEA/ARP; NEA/RA; PA; R; DRL 
LONDON FOR VAN DE VATE 
DUBAI FOR SHELL-SMITH 
 
E.O.: N/A 
TAGS: PREL KMDR KPAO KDEM PHUM SA
SUBJECT:  Saudi Arabia: Special Media Reaction on Secretary 
Clinton's Statements on Settlements 
 
REF:  RIYADH 1423 
 
RIYADH 00001467  001.2 OF 002 
 
 
¶1.  Summary:  Editorial comments have criticized the Secretary for 
what they view as a reversal of the U.S. position with her 
statements in Israel.  Editorial comments have yet to surface 
regarding her statements made in Marrakech, other than those noting 
her attempts to "soften" her previous statements as she prepared to 
face Arab Foreign Ministers in Morocco.  Broadcast coverage on Saudi 
television has been limited.  End summary. 
 
¶2.  Key Headlines: 
--Al-Hayat (front page):  "Arab and American Moves to Save the Peace 
Process.  Clinton Has Softened Her Tune Regarding Settlements." 
 
--Al-Riyadh (inside page):  "Clinton Has Confirmed the American 
Opposition to Expansion of Settlements, No Change.  Hillary in 
Marrakech:  Netanyahu's Offer to Restrict Settlement Is Less Than 
Our Wish, but Will Have An Important Effect on Peace." 
 
--Al-Madina (inside page):  "Clinton:  Our Position, Which Opposes 
Israeli Settlements, Has Not Changed." 
 
--ASharq Al-Awsat (front page):  "Clinton Moves Away in Marrakech: 
What Israel Has Offered Is Less than Our Expectations." 
 
--Arab News (front page): "Clinton Moderates Statement on 
Settlements." 
 
--Saudi Gazette (front page): "Clinton Faces Arab Ministers after 
Backing Israel." 
 
 
¶3.  Editorials (chronological from latest): 
 
--Influential Al-Riyadh asked in their headline (11/03), "Has Obama 
Failed in his First Test?"  The paper editorialized, "Let's adopt a 
single position by restoring the issue of peace to the principle of 
'land for peace' and halting settlement activities as a firm 
position in any peace equation.  Let's also, just once, test our 
power, which was diminished and has become just a sound without an 
echo, even regarding the basics of our major issues... The battle, 
according to current proposals, is lost with America and Israel as 
well. But, we can make our position firm and continue public 
relations with the superpower without breaking off relations or 
declaring diplomatic wars... no harm to put off the negotiations for 
a year or two if they will yield more benefits." 
 
--Makkah-based conservative Al-Nadwa (11/03), in an editorial 
entitled, "In Order not to Reward Netanyahu on his Crimes," urged, 
"Our brothers in the Palestinian Authority look forward to a strong 
Arab position to back their position in regard to linking 
negotiations with Israel with freezing settlements policy... In 
order for the Arab's absence in supporting the Palestinians not to 
persist, our brothers the Palestinians look forward to an emergency 
meeting for Arab foreign ministers to carefully deliberate the issue 
in light of the American shift, which Hillary Clinton expressed." 
 
--Conservative Al-Nadwa opined (11/02), "It is regrettable that U.S. 
Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, announced that Israel had 
presented unprecedented concessions in order to move forward 
negotiations with the Palestinians. ...  Clinton's statement, 
regrettably, departs from the declared U.S. president's policy. ... 
In reality, Israel has not presented anything, but Clinton's 
statement indicates a big change in the U.S. policy toward the 
region, a change that almost endorses the same policies of the 
previous administration under the leadership of Bush. ...  The Arab 
nation must send a strong message through an emergency meeting, 
which confirms that peace will not be completed with the existence 
of the settlements policy, which was deplored by all, including 
President Obama." 
 
--Al-Watan editorialized (11/02), "Is the acknowledgement by U.S. 
Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, that her mission in the Middle 
East has collapsed, indicative of unwillingness by the U.S. 
administration to pursue policies announced by President Obama 
regarding the Middle East?" 
 
--An editorial in Al-Madina stated (11/02), "President Obama's 
address from Cairo University to the Muslim world is, regrettably, 
fading away.  The ray of hope the speech gave to Arabs and Muslims 
is vanishing as well.  The current U.S. administration understands 
that the most dangerous threat the world could face comes from 
hopeless people, desperate from a long absence of justice.  If there 
were any advice to Obama's administration and to Secretary Clinton 
 
RIYADH 00001467  002.2 OF 002 
 
 
it would be, 'Do not let desperate people write history with their 
blood and the blood of others.'" 
 
--English language daily Arab news editorialized (11/02), "By 
refraining from exercising any level of pressure on Tel Aviv to halt 
settlements, Washington has, in effect, approved this policy, 
leaving Palestinian negotiators with nothing to discuss in any 
future peace talks.  This is bound to create another wave of tension 
amongst Palestinians in both the West Bank and Gaza. ...  It is 
Clinton's turn these days.  With regard to Israeli settlements, her 
expressed goal is to 'narrow the gap to a sufficient degree' so both 
sides can agree to resume negotiations.  If she cannot fare any 
better than Obama and Mitchell, then at least she should try to make 
sure things don't slide backward.  But her unabashed alliance with 
Netanyahu over the settlements widens the gap further and creates a 
more precipitous slide." 
 
¶4.  Comments from the Websites: 
 
Al-Riyadh (11/02) 
 
Saleh Rasheed Ibrahim stated, "Palestine is on the doors of victory 
and Clinton's bias toward Israel is only a tactic in a battle to 
gain her votes for the future -the final word will be for the 
president. Palestine's history will be read by future generations as 
the crusades were." 
 
Dr. Hashem Al Falali said, "Palestine still leads a troubled path 
for peace, not by its own fault - there are people conspiring to 
create an impossible situation for peace and stability in a zone 
that has suffered occupation, war, property theft, and many other 
tragedies" 
 
Al Watan 11/03 
 
Dr. Hashem Al-Falali stated, "This area has reached such a level of 
stagnation in the peace process and all efforts have gone with the 
wind.  The Arab claims have not been listened to by either Israel - 
the other part of the Arab-Israeli conflict - nor by major nations 
that can put pressure on Israel to go back to peace negotiations and 
commit to all charters and covenants. 
 
Khaled Al Hafeer encouraged condemnation in response to the article, 
saying, "We will continue condemnation and denunciation with all our 
might in spite of the Americans and Israelis.  Continue condemnation 
for there is nothing new." 
 
ZIADEH#