Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BEIJING3137, MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT OBAMA'S VISIT TO CHINA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BEIJING3137.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BEIJING3137 2009-11-19 09:23 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Beijing
VZCZCXRO2404
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #3137/01 3230923
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190923Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6879
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BEIJING 003137 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/CM, EAP/PA, EAP/PD, C 
HQ PACOM FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR (J007) 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PREL ECON KMDR OPRC CH
 
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT OBAMA'S VISIT TO CHINA 
 
-------------------- 
  Editorial Quotes 
-------------------- 
 
PRESIDENT OBAMA'S VISIT TO CHINA 
 
a. "China should have the ability to shape the U.S." (pg 14) 
 
The official Communist Party international news publication Global 
Times (Huanqiu Shibao)(11/19)(pg 14): "During his visit to Asia, 
President Obama has shown frankness, wisdom and a desire to move 
forward as a young American leader.  Suddenly confronted with a 
United States that has adopted a milder attitude, China should note 
several things.  First, China should not become cocky over the fact 
that after the financial crisis the world is praising China's 
economic model and criticizing the U.S. model.  Second, China should 
use this moment to look for diplomatic opportunities.  China always 
responded to American political signals rather than take the 
initiative to provide advice in dealing with the United States.  In 
the future, China should shift its diplomatic focus to the American 
people in the U.S., leading them to give up hostility and vigilance 
against China and understand China better.  And third, China should 
be sober enough to see the limits of the changes in U.S. diplomacy. 
That U.S. diplomacy is a mixture of ideology and dealing from 
strength will not change.  President Obama said in Shanghai that 
American students coming to study in China will greatly increase, to 
100,000.  However, currently there are still no relevant official 
regulations, or official fund, to guarantee that in the United 
States.  It would be a historical progress if the U.S. federal or 
state government could take effective measures to support the issue. 
 In this way, 'mutual study and common progress,' proposed by the 
U.S. Ambassador to China, looks likes it may be about to be 
realized." 
 
b. "Wen Jiabao: China opposes a 'G2'" 
 
The Shanghai-based Shanghai Media Group (SMG) publication, China 
Business News (Diyi Caijing)(11/19)(pg A3): "Although Obama is 
trying to promote Sino-American cooperation, China clearly does not 
support the concept of a 'G2.'  Premier Wen Jiabao talked about the 
reasons: first, China is a developing country with a large 
population and still has a long way to become modernized; second, 
China advocates independent diplomacy and will not ally itself with 
any country; and third, China insists that all countries should 
together make decisions on world's affairs, instead of one or two 
countries.  Shi Yinhong, the Director of Renmin University's 
Institute of International Relations, said that a lot of Americans 
are talking about a 'G2,' which is part of the United States' 
strategy to get China to do things in accordance with the 
recommendations of the United States on financial, economic and 
international security issues.  However, the U.S. emphasis on China, 
reflected by the concept of a G2, is welcomed.  China will not 
sacrifice relations with other countries for its relations with the 
United States.  China will for sure promote diplomacy of its own, a 
process in which the United States is very important." 
 
c. "The invisible concerns of building a China-U.S. partnership" 
 
The China Radio International sponsored newspaper World News Journal 
(Shijie Xinwenbao)(11/19)(pg 2): "The U.S.-China joint statement has 
shown an obvious characteristic of seeking common ground while 
accepting existing differences.  Experts believe that the statement 
is a chance for the U.S. to adapt to the era and shows the U.S.'s 
temporarily positive attitude about China's rise.  Both countries 
have honestly stated their stances on how to deal with each other's 
core interests.  On issues of China's core interests, like the 
Taiwan issue and trade protectionism, since China has clearly made 
its stance, the bilateral frictions on these issues will decrease in 
the future.  However, concerning core interests of the United 
States, the frictions will increase.  In contrast to China, the 
United States is unwilling to talk clearly about its core interests 
because they are difficult to talk about.  They are also vague and 
mutable.  Given the recent global changes, it is good for the world 
that China and the United States have affirmed their partnership to 
jointly address global challenges.  We hope, though, that this 
partnership can become more practical." 
 
d. "The common language of partners" 
 
The official Xinhua News Agency international news publication 
International Herald Leader (Guoji Xianqu Daobao)(11/19)(pg 10): 
"Cooperation in more than 20 fields and about 45 times citing 'both 
sides agree' in the U.S.-China joint statement has shown that 
U.S.-China relations, after 37 years of development, are at a 
critical time of deep cooperation.  A partnership to deal with 
common challenges -  a new phrase to describe new U.S.-China 
relations - reflects the common hope of both countries.  Sino-U.S. 
relations are definitely not characteristic of the 'beautiful and 
moderate' relations between big powers.  Although Obama's visit to 
 
BEIJING 00003137  002 OF 002 
 
 
China ended in a cheer, the difficult task of addressing U.S. 
domestic concerns and convincing the U.S. public of the importance 
of Sino-U.S. relations is still ahead.  It is not easy for a 
President with limited diplomatic experience.  Obama's visit to 
China is just a beginning." 
 
HUNTSMAN