Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Brazil Sri Lanka United Kingdom Sweden 00. Editorial United States Latin America Egypt Jordan Yemen Thailand

Browse latest releases

2010/11 2010/12 2011/01 2011/02 2011/03 2011/04 2011/05 2011/06 2011/07 2011/08

Browse by creation date

66 72 73 75 79 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

CONFIDENTIAL CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN SECRET SECRET//NOFORN UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Community resources

Follow us on Twitter Check our Reddit Twitter this Digg this page Contact us on IRC

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09PARIS1409, French have no response to US Proposal to Change GNEP into

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PARIS1409.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09PARIS1409 2009-10-19 15:34 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris 
VZCZCXYZ0002
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHFR #1409 2921534
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 191534Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 7374
INFO RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
 
UNCLAS PARIS 001409 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
For ISN/NESS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG KNNP IAEA FR
SUBJECT: French have no response to US Proposal to Change GNEP into 
INEF 
 
REF: State 106834 
 
ΒΆ1. (U) The French accepted without substantive response our 
non-paper on the U.S. proposal to change the Global Nuclear Energy 
Partnership (GNEP) into the International Nuclear Energy Framework 
(INEF).  Both the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Nuclear 
Non-Proliferation Policy Division, and the Ministry of Ecology, 
Environment, Sustainable Development and Oceans (MEEDDM) offices 
handling international nuclear issues had no immediate response. 
The French Atomic Energy Commission (CEA) readily responded that 
they were already familiar with the proposal, and the Chairman of 
the CEA, Mr. Bigot, looks forward to discussing the proposal with 
the US delegation soon. 
 
RIVKIN