Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BERLIN1333, GERMANY EXPRESSES TEPID SUPPORT FOR GEOGRAPHICAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BERLIN1333.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BERLIN1333 2009-10-26 06:36 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Berlin
VZCZCXRO9622
OO RUEHIK
DE RUEHRL #1333 2990636
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 260636Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5568
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES  PRIORITY
UNCLAS BERLIN 001333 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
STATE PASS USTR FOR TANUJA GARDE AND DAWN SHACKLEFORD 
FAS/OCRA/NENON; FAS/OSTA/RMACKE 
FAS/OFSO/DYOUNG; FAS/ONA/ABURST 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON ETRD EUN KIPR
SUBJECT: GERMANY EXPRESSES TEPID SUPPORT FOR GEOGRAPHICAL 
INDICATIONS REGISTRY 
 
REF: STATE 104985 
 
1.  (SBU) Post delivered reftel demarche to 
representatives of Germany's Ministry of Agriculture, the 
Ministry of Economics and Technology and the Foreign 
Office. 
 
2.  (SBU) The head of the AgMin's International Trade 
Policy Division, Klaus Kehrein, told FAS that extending 
Geographical Indications (GI) protection to wines and 
spirits under the TRIPS Agreement is not a priority for 
Germany.  Kehrein said that Germany does support GIs 
specifically for wine, but he candidly stated that 
extending GI protection to other products and creating a 
legally binding registry is mainly being pushed by 
southern EU Mediterranean countries (i.e., Italy, Spain, 
Portugal and France).  Kehrein further stated that, since 
Germany is an EU member, it will likely support the 
European Commission's proposal out of solidarity. 
 
3.  (SBU) Christina Decker of the External Economic 
Policy Section in the Econ Ministry said that it is no 
secret that Germany is not a strong supporter of 
extending Geographical Indications (GI) protection. 
Decker stated that the Econ Ministry understands the U.S. 
concerns with extending GIs, but this is an issue that is 
very important for some EU member countries (i.e., the 
countries mentioned above), and ultimately all EU member 
countries have to agree on a common position in trade 
matters.  Decker also acknowledged that giving more 
leeway to developing countries, such as Brazil and India, 
on patent protection is not in the interest of German 
industry, but this was purely a political move to gain 
their support for the GIs proposal. 
 
4.  (SBU) Comment: Germany could become a potential U.S. 
ally within the EU on this issue. It is unclear, however, 
whether Germany is willing to invest political capital. 
Embassy has scheduled several meetings at a more senior 
level to encourage support from Germany and will report 
evolution of German views.  End Comment. 
 
 
MURPHY