Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BEIJING2904, MEDIA REACTION: CONGRESSIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT,

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BEIJING2904.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BEIJING2904 2009-10-19 09:05 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Beijing
VZCZCXRO3234
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #2904 2920905
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190905Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6481
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS BEIJING 002904 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/CM, EAP/PA, EAP/PD, C 
HQ PACOM FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR (J007) 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: PREL ECON KMDR OPRC CH
 
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: CONGRESSIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT, 
'POISONOUS DRYWALL,' SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COOPERATION 
 
-------------------- 
  Editorial Quotes 
-------------------- 
 
1.  U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS 
 
"It is hard for the U.S. Congress to change its view on China" 
 
The official Xinhua News Agency international news publication 
International Herald Leader (Guoji Xianqu Daobao) (10/19)(pg 4): "On 
October 16, the Congressional-Executive Commission on China issued a 
'Human Rights Report on China.'  The Chinese Ministry of Foreign 
Affairs believes that the report is full of ignorance and prejudice. 
 The Commission should stop issuing reports that distort the facts 
and interfere in China's internal affairs.  Experts note the irony 
that the report's data are not from the Chinese government or the 
UN, but rather come from a variety of channels that are not 
authoritative.  Zhang Liping, Director of the Office of U.S. Studies 
at the China Academy of Social Sciences, said that the reason that 
the Commission issues such a report every year is to try to maintain 
its influence over China and to prevent the White House from gaining 
a monopoly on diplomatic initiatives with China.  However, the 
report's influence is limited.  Since Obama currently needs 
cooperation from China, he will not easily swing the human rights 
stick at China like his processors did." 
 
2.  'POISONOUS DRYWALL' 
 
"The U.S. wants compensation from China for 'poisonous walls'" 
 
The official Communist Party international news publication Global 
Times (Huanqiu Shibao)(10/19)(pg 11): "Zhou Shijian at the China 
Council for the Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT) said that 
the U.S. needs to issue an authoritative report [on the toxic 
drywall issue] that is recognized by both the U.S. and China. 
Chinese products exported to the U.S. have to go through three 
checks: Chinese quality control, the Chinese Exports Inspection 
Department, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.  If the walls 
are really poisonous, then both the U.S. and China are responsible. 
The U.S. should not blame China.  According to an American 
consulting company, the toxic drywall issue will cause $1.5 
billion-$2.5 billion in economic losses.  Zhou argued that any 
compensation should be based on an authoritative report.  However, 
due to the complexity of the technology involved and insufficient 
resources, it is still unclear when such a drywall report can be 
issued." 
 
3.  SOUTH AND CENTRAL ASIA COOPERATION 
 
"Central and South Asia are increasing interactions" 
 
The official Communist Party People's Daily (Renmin Ribao) 
(10/19)(pg 3): "There are three reasons that the level of 
interaction between Central and South Asia is increasing.  First, 
the situation in Afghanistan is a common concern for both regions. 
Both Central Asia and South Asia are willing to create a better 
environment for peace and stability in Afghanistan.  Second, both 
regions can further their geopolitical interests through 
cooperation.  India and Pakistan both want to expand their influence 
in the region and are also eager for [access to] the region's 
plentiful oil and mineral resources.  Through South Asia, Central 
Asia can open a door to the outside world and decrease its 
dependence on Russia.  Third, the U.S. is also working behind the 
scenes, pushing for collaboration between the two regions in order 
to advance its own interests.  The new U.S. strategy on Afghanistan 
and Pakistan involves seeking a 'radical resolution' to the 
Afghanistan issue.  The U.S. is happy to see 'resource cooperation' 
between India and Pakistan and Central Asia.  Therefore, it is 
undeniable that cooperation between the two regions will have 
far-reaching influence on European and Asian geopolitics." 
 
 
HUNTSMAN