Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BAKU846, READOUT OF BAKU BSEC MEETING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BAKU846.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BAKU846 2009-10-28 05:42 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Baku
VZCZCXYZ0000
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKB #0846/01 3010542
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 280542Z OCT 09
FM AMEMBASSY BAKU
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1939
INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 3609
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS PRIORITY 0017
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST PRIORITY 0093
RUEHCH/AMEMBASSY CHISINAU PRIORITY 0095
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KYIV PRIORITY 0139
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 0833
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI PRIORITY 1896
RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA PRIORITY 0025
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW PRIORITY 0073
RUEHYE/AMEMBASSY YEREVAN PRIORITY 1655
RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL PRIORITY 0171
UNCLAS BAKU 000846 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EUR/PGI:TRCUNNINGHAM 
DEPT FOR EUR/PGI:BLPOISSON 
DEPT FOR OES/STC:EADAUGHARTY 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON AJ TU AM GG
SUBJECT: READOUT OF BAKU BSEC MEETING 
 
1.  SUMMARY: Azerbaijan hosted the Black Sea Economic 
Cooperation Forum October 20-22.  This was Azerbaijan's last 
act as chair of the BSEC, as the baton was then passed to 
Bulgaria.  Highlights included appearances by Turkish FM 
Davutoglu and Armenian DFM Kirakossian.  Both of their 
appearances were without incident.  Three Memorandums were 
postponed to the next meeting, one between BSEC and the 
Central European Initiative ) Executive Secretariat, the 
second between BSEC and the Danube Commission, and the third 
between BSEC and the United States.  End Summary. 
 
 
-------------------------------------------- 
Turkish FM and Armenian DFM in the Spotlight 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
2.  Turkish Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu (in town to 
repair Turkey-Azerbaijan relations in the wake of the 
Turkey-Armenia rapprochement) made an appearance at the BSEC 
meetings and said that Turkey wanted to see more effort and 
cooperation at BSEC, and for the BSEC to be made more 
efficient.  Armenian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Arman 
Kirakossian repeatedly thanked Azerbaijan for organizing the 
meeting, and encouraged cooperation among BSEC countries. 
Davutoglu and Kirakossian's participation took the spotlight, 
and evening news coverage was devoted solely to the two. 
 
 
--------------------------------------- 
From Each Nation, A Different Viewpoint 
--------------------------------------- 
 
3.  Many delegates emphasized their determination to make the 
BSEC more efficient and effective.  Turkey, Moldova, Albania, 
Georgia, Greece, and Romania supported the BSEC 
transportation initiatives.  The representatives from Ukraine 
repeatedly mentioned the need for efficiency and 
effectiveness within the BSEC.  Climate change was only 
mentioned by the Greek representative.  The Russian 
representative complained that observer countries were not 
doing enough to support BSEC. 
 
4.  Georgian Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs David 
Jalagania complained that the Russia Federation is not in 
compliance with BSEC rules.  He said Russia has closed its 
borders with Georgia, and is occupying Georgian territory. 
He noted that through  hard work and the help of the USG, 
Georgia has persevered despite Russia's actions.  Finally, he 
also emphasized the importance of the Nabucco pipeline. 
 
5.  Polish Ambassador to Baku Krzysztof Krajewski stated that 
BSEC was important to his country, and that Poland supports 
creating stronger ties between Eastern and Southeastern 
European countries and the EU. 
 
 
------------------------------------- 
Memorandums Postponed to Next Meeting 
------------------------------------- 
 
6.  The Memorandum of Intent between the USG and BSEC on 
Science and Technology was postponed until the next meeting. 
Two MOUs were discussed, but neither was passed: the 
Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation between BSEC and 
the Central European Initiative ) Executive Secretariat 
(MUCP), and the Memorandum of Understanding of Sectorial 
Dialogue Partnership between the Danube Commission and the 
Black Sea Economic Cooperation Organization (MUSD). 
 
7.  Ukraine and a few other countries were disappointed with 
the lack of action on MUCP, while Russia wanted to continue 
with discussions and further changes.  A drafting committee 
will be organized to re-write MUCP and the new memorandum 
will be discussed at the next meeting.  A disagreement 
between Russia and Turkey prevented passage of the MUSD; the 
Turks insisted on using the word "safety" with regard to 
transportation while Russia wanted the word deleted.  Russia 
also insisted on replacing "enter into force" with weaker 
language. 
 
 
------------------------------------------ 
Side Commentary from the EU Representative 
------------------------------------------ 
 
8.  Finally, the EU representative told Poloff that he does 
not like dealing with BSEC because of its inaction, but 
rather he prefers to act with smaller groups of interested 
countries on each issue.  He also noted that Russia has told 
him to work directly with the BSEC, but that in BSEC meetings 
the Russian delegates block many of the memorandums, and he 
said "this was a very strange contradiction." 
LU