VZCZCXRO0086
OO RUEHGH
DE RUEHUL #1436/01 2510739
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 080739Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY SEOUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5586
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC 9117
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC//DDI/OEA//
RHHMUNA/USCINCPAC HONOLULU HI//FPA//
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RUEKDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC//DB-Z//
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 0257
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6595
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 6670
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 1237
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 4996
RUEHIN/AIT TAIPEI 3957
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 7173
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1485
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 2801
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1879
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 2487

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 SEOUL 001436 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR ECON KPAO KS US
SUBJECT: SEOUL - PRESS BULLETIN; September 8, 2009 
 
TOP HEADLINES 
------------- 
 
 
Chosun Ilbo, Hankook Ilbo, Segye Ilbo, Seoul Shinmun 
Pyongyang Does Not Apologize for ROK Casualties Caused by Its Dam 
Discharge 
 
JoongAng Ilbo 
34 Heads of Local Governments Support Mergers 
with Other Cities or Counties 
 
Dong-a Ilbo 
Government Agencies Out of Step over "Green Projects" 
 
Hankyoreh Shinmun 
Peace Forum Launched to Continue Engagement Policy 
toward Pyongyang 
 
 
DOMESTIC DEVELOPMENTS 
--------------------- 
 
In response to the ROK's demand for an explanation for the sudden 
rise in water level along the Imjin River that has claimed at least 
three ROK lives so far, North Korea admitted Monday that it released 
water from one of its dams after flash flooding occurred along the 
river on Sunday.  Seoul still expressed regret, saying that the 
North did not mention the casualties caused by the unannounced 
discharge, adding that it would seek an inter-Korean accord to 
prevent a recurrence. (All) 
 
Chairman of the Korea International Trade Association Sakong Il, who 
also heads the G-20 Summit Korea Coordination Committee, will visit 
the U.S. from September 8-10 as a special envoy of President Lee 
Myung-bak to prepare for the G20 summit. (Chosun) 
 
The Barack Obama and George W. Bush Administrations are the same in 
that they intend to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue within a 
multilateral framework and place importance on a nuclear 
non-proliferation policy, but the Obama Administration departs from 
the Bush Administration by seeking a reduction of its own nuclear 
stockpile and a comprehensive package deal with North Korea. 
(Dong-a) 
 
 
INTERNATIONAL NEWS 
------------------ 
 
The World Food Programme said in its report, which recently appeared 
in a magazine published by the ROK's Korea Development Institute, 
that a third of North Korean women and young children are 
malnourished and the North will run short of food by almost 1.8 
million tons this year. (Hankyoreh, Seoul) 
 
 
MEDIA ANALYSIS 
-------------- 
North Korean denuclearization - Ambassador Bosworth's trip 
 
Conservative Dong-a Ilbo said in its inside-page feature story that 
the Barack Obama and George W. Bush Administrations are the same in 
that they intend to resolve the North Korean nuclear issue within a 
multilateral framework and give importance to nuclear 
non-proliferation policy, but the Obama Administration makes a 
departure from the Bush Administration by seeking a reduction of its 
own nuclear stockpile and a comprehensive package deal with North 
Korea. 
 
On their Monday editions, right-of-center JoongAng Ilbo and moderate 
Hankook Ilbo quoted Ambassador Bosworth as saying in an apparent 
response to Pyongyang's call for direct dialogue with the U.S., that 
there is no fundamental change in North Korea's attitude and, 
 
SEOUL 00001436  002 OF 008 
 
 
therefore, this is not the time to start a dialogue with North 
Korea.  He was quoted further as saying that even if (the United 
States has) a bilateral dialogue with the North, it will be held 
within the context of the Six-Party Talks.  Joongang Ilbo reported 
that through consultations with Ambassador Bosworth, the ROK and the 
U.S. coordinated their stances to seek a two-track approach of 
sanctions and dialogue in dealing with the North.  Hankyoreh Shinmun 
quoted a high-ranking ROKG official as saying, "We are not currently 
considering a visit by Ambassador Bosworth to North Korea." 
 
JoongAng Ilbo reported on Monday that the Washington-based Institute 
for Science and International Security (ISIS) said a black and white 
satellite image of the Yongbyon nuclear facility showed key parts of 
the reactor still in disrepair.  The daily also replayed a Christian 
Science Monitor story saying that North Korea's uranium claim 
"appears as a grab for the attention of the U.S. and other major 
powers." 
 
In reference to North Korea's claim that it has entered the final 
phase of uranium enrichment, Chosun Ilbo reported on Saturday that 
North Korea has moved from "begging (for dialogue) to threatening." 
 
JoongAng Ilbo reported on Monday that Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a ranking 
U.S. Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called for 
the re-designation of North Korea as a state sponsor of terrorism, 
saying that Washington's North Korea policy has failed. 
 
Afghanistan 
 
Moderate Hankook Ilbo reported that there is discord among Western 
troop-contributing nations over Afghan policies.  While the U.S. 
plans to deploy additional troops to Afghanistan, the U.K, Germany, 
and France recently said that an international conference would be 
held this year to discuss the transfer of security control to the 
Afghan government, which can be interpreted as the three nations' 
desire to "wash their hands of" Afghanistan. 
 
JoongAng Ilbo and Hankook Ilbo reported on Monday that with a large 
number of civilian casualties in a NATO airstrike, Obama is in a 
difficult position regarding a new Afghan strategy. 
 
Under the headline, "Will Russia Join Hands with the U.S. in Obama's 
War?" Hankyoreh Shinmun reported in its Monday edition that Russia 
made clear its intention to join Western allied forces in the war in 
Afghanistan, and the U.S. and NATO responded positively to it. 
 
Japan 
 
Chosun Ilbo, in its September 7 edition, quoted Japanese media 
reports as saying that although Japan's Prime Minister-elect Yukio 
Hatoyama picked Katsuya Okada, who has stressed a "balance" in 
foreign policy, instead of focusing on the U.S. , to be foreign 
minister, there will be no big change in pending issues, including 
the redeployment of U.S. troops in Japan, for the time being. 
 
 
OPINIONS/EDITORIALS 
------------------- 
 
"WE SHOULD NOT GIVE IN TO NORTH KOREA'S NUCLEAR THREAT" (Dong-a 
Ilbo, September 5, 2009, page 27) 
 
"The international community, including the UN, must consistently 
maintain its position that it will strengthen sanctions in response 
to North Korea's threat.  Cooperation between the ROK and the U.S. 
should be, of course, watertight...  The two nations should remind 
the North that the only solution (to the current standoff) is for 
the North to return to the Six-Party Talks and take a path toward 
denuclearization.  They also need to clearly warn Pyongyang that 
additional provocations will only ratchet up sanctions against the 
North.  China should now take specific actions so that the North 
will change its attitude." 
 
 
 
SEOUL 00001436  003 OF 008 
 
 
"HOW SHOULD WE DEAL WITH NORTH KOREA, WHICH HAS NO INTENTION OF 
ABANDONING ITS NUCLEAR AMBITIONS?" 
(Chosun Ilbo, September 5, 2009, page 35) 
 
Conservative Chosun Ilbo editorialized (09/05): "It is more 
realistic to think that the North Korean nuclear issue does not 
depend on the outcome of the Six-Party Talks or U.S.-North Korea 
dialogue but on (the survival of) the North Korean regime.  To date, 
the international community has tried to ignore a pessimistic view 
that Pyongyang will never give up its nuclear ambitions as long as 
it survives.  However, a moment of truth will arrive some day, and 
then, everyone will have to face up to the reality... While managing 
the situation regarding the North with pressure and dialogue, we 
should prepare for the moment that will determine the fate of the 
Korean Peninsula." 
 
 
NORTH'S RIDICULOUS POSTURING 
(JoongAng Ilbo, September 5, 2009, page 34: Excerpts) 
 
North Korea has challenged international society once again.  When 
the United Nations Security Council asked North Korea to explain why 
it violated UN resolutions, it did not present any excuses. 
Instead, it resorted to provocative language, increasing a nuclear 
threat. 
 
Pyongyang has revealed that tests to make weapons using plutonium 
and uranium were successful and has made clear that it will face any 
sanctions with "strengthened nuclear control."  The attitude of 
North Korea is ridiculous.  Its actions are like a wild child waving 
a weapon, cutting himself and creating a scene in the marketplace. 
 
It is a shame because the North Korean people would not have to 
starve anymore if the government thought about how it could (improve 
living conditions) with the budget that is going into developing 
nuclear weapons. 
 
It appears as if North Korea's actions are based on its own 
calculations.  North Korea said it has linked its nuclear armament 
to what it regards as a hostile North Korea policy pursued by United 
States.  It also said the United States should meet the demands of 
North Korea at negotiations to advance denuclearization of the 
Korean Peninsula and the rest of the world. 
 
The unique point about the recent incident is that North Korea went 
further than just the Korean Peninsula and mentioned "world 
denuclearization."  The claim was aimed at U.S. President Barack 
Obama, who is pursuing international denuclearization.  Success of 
the uranium tests was mentioned as a subtle threat, showing it could 
pursue the development of uranium nuclear weapons, which are more 
difficult to observe and trace than plutonium nuclear weapons. 
 
North Korea may have (announced that it has) new uranium nuclear 
developments, but its actions are not new.  It says it is not 
against denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula or the world, but 
s-e-c-r-e-t-l-y it has no intention of giving up its nuclear 
weapons.  The fact that North Korea has always found an excuse for 
nuclear armament and has actively pursued such a program for almost 
20 years proves this point. 
 
If we take our eyes off the ball, tensions could rapidly rise on the 
Korean Peninsula.  We need to show that we will always stand firm 
and we need to demand evidence that the North is genuine about 
denuclearization. 
 
Neglecting North Korean nuclear armament is likely to turn into a 
bigger problem for the ROK and international society.  The only 
solution is for North Korea to quit its nuclear weapons program 
through compromise, a concept the communist country is not familiar 
with, but should be. 
 
(This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is 
identical to the Korean version.) 
 
 
SEOUL 00001436  004 OF 008 
 
 
 
NORTH KOREA'S LETTER: REQUEST FOR NEGOTIATIONS 
(Hankyoreh Shinmun, September 5, 2009, page 23) 
 
North Korea sent a letter to the United Nations Security Council 
(UNSC) on Friday in which it criticized international sanctions and 
announced its intentions to improve its nuclear capabilities. 
Although it cannot be interpreted as a new provocation, we feel 
regret over any possible negative effects it may have on resuming 
negotiations.  We are especially concerned about the effect of North 
Korea's declaration, "We are in the last stages of uranium 
enrichment." 
 
This letter was a response to the UNSC's request for an explanation 
about the fact that a North Korean ship was detained by the United 
Arab Emirates because of weapons on board.  In this letter, North 
Korea fails to recognize UNSC resolutions related to sanctions. 
Moreover, North Korea focuses on direct negotiations with the U.S. 
by saying, "The denuclearization of the Korea Peninsula is closely 
related to the U.S.'s nuclear policy on the Korean Peninsula."  This 
can be interpreted to mean that North Korea has made it clear that 
it will counter sanctions by improving its nuclear capability, but 
hopes for dialogue with the U.S.  The attitude of the letter is in 
line with its recent behavior to improve the environment for 
negotiations with the ROK and the U.S. 
 
There is no precedent for evaluating North Korea's recent moves, 
including the content of this letter, either pessimistically or 
optimistically.  In addition, we believe no country thinks that the 
matter can be solved by sanctions alone, and the resumption of 
negotiations regarding the nuclear issue is not going to be easy. 
As a result, there seems to be no other way but to find a new 
framework for negotiations and talks while sanctions are in place. 
During this process, every country involved should restrain from 
provoking each other. 
 
What is critical now is the creation of an effective negotiation 
framework in order to completely resolve the nuclear issue while 
controlling the factors (that might lead to) conflict.  The U.S. and 
China talks have demonstrated these efforts, and the visit of U.S. 
Special Representative for North Korea Policy Stephen Bosworth to 
Seoul on Saturday can be seen as related (to these efforts to create 
a negotiation framework.) 
 
The problem facing us now is speed and depth.  It has been two 
months since the U.S. appointed Kurt Campbell as the Assistant 
Secretary of State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs and his 
announcement that preparations of a "comprehensive package" for 
North Korea were underway. 
 
Matters could proceed on a positive note once dialogue begins, 
however, further delay could have a negative effect.  Every 
participating country should work with this in mind and stop waiting 
for a better environment to emerge.  The ROKG should be making an 
effort to speed up dialogue as a matter of the highest priority. 
 
(This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is 
identical to the Korean version.) 
 
 
FEATURES 
-------- 
 
BOSWORTH SAYS THAT NOW IS NOT THE TIME TO RESUME TALKS WITH NORTH 
KOREA 
(JoongAng Ilbo, September 7, 2009, page10: Excerpts) 
 
By Reporter Ye Yeoung-june 
 
Through consultations with U.S. Special Representative for North 
Korea Policy Stephen Bosworth, the ROK and the U.S. coordinated 
their positions to seek a two-track approach of sanctions and 
dialogue in dealing with the North.  The two-track approach is 
fundamentally different from the ones in the past in that the U.S. 
 
SEOUL 00001436  005 OF 008 
 
 
will not lift sanctions even if it engages in talks with the North. 
An ROKG official said that, in the past, sanctions became futile 
when talks began with North Korea.  There was a continuous pattern 
in which North Korea initiated talks at its will and halted them, 
citing excuses.  This led to North Korea buying time to continue its 
nuclear development. 
 
The two-track approach also calls for seeking an ultimate solution 
through negotiation while leaving the door of dialogue open. 
 
This will remain as a guiding principle as long as the ROK and the 
U.S. want to solve the North Korean nuclear issue diplomatically. 
However, for the present, the ROK and the U.S. share the view that 
they should not yet hastily accept North Korea's overtures for talks 
even though (North Korea) expressed a keen interest (in having the 
talks) by making a flurry of conciliatory moves.  The ROK and the 
U.S. are not rejecting Pyongyang's suggestion of talks but are 
urging North Korea to demonstrate its seriousness first. 
 
An ROKG official said that the ROK and the U.S. have not laid out 
any definite and concrete conditions for resuming talks but the 
conditions will be set in a flexible manner.  But the one 
(condition) that has been consistently reiterated by both countries 
is that North Korea should return to the Six-Party Talks. 
 
 
BOSWORTH RESTATES NEED FOR SIX-PARTY FRAMEWORK 
(JoongAng Daily, September 7, 2009) 
 
By Reporter Yoo Jee-ho 
 
The U.S. Special Representative for North Korea (Policy) believes 
Pyongyang hasn't fundamentally changed, despite its recent 
conciliatory moves, and that denuclearization of the Korean 
Peninsula remains a goal for Washington and its dialogue partners at 
the Six-Party table. 
 
Stephen Bosworth, who wrapped up his three-day stay in Seoul 
yesterday, also said the United States would have bilateral talks 
with North Korea only within the Six-Party framework. 
 
Bosworth, who met with ROK Foreign Minister Yu Myung-hwan and chief 
nuclear envoy Wi Sung-lac over the weekend, said he was "pleased" 
with the level of agreement and coordination between Washington and 
Seoul, and said, "We are agreed entirely that denuclearization, 
complete and verifiable, of the Korean peninsula remains our core 
interest in engagement with the North Koreans." 
 
Bosworth, former U.S. Ambassador to the ROK, added the United States 
and its partners "remain committed to the Six-Party process." 
 
"As we've indicated in the past, we're prepared to engage 
bilaterally as well with the North Koreans, but only in the context 
of the Six-Party process," Bosworth added. 
 
The diplomat also noted that there has not been any fundamental 
change on North Korea's part, despite the recent release of the two 
American journalists from Pyongyang's detention. 
 
"Our primary interest remains the denuclearization of the Korean 
Peninsula," Bosworth said, "and we continue to look for 
opportunities to reinitiate this process." 
 
Bosworth arrived in Seoul on Friday, the same day North Korea 
announced that its uranium enrichment program for nuclear weapons 
development was in its final phase.  Bosworth called the nuclear 
program "a subject of concern" and added the issue "would have to be 
addressed if we are going to deal comprehensively with the 
denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula." 
 
"Clearly, it is another manifestation of the problems posed by North 
Korea's efforts to acquire nuclear weapons," he said.  "This is not 
the first we've heard of (uranium enrichment).   It may not be the 
last." 
 
SEOUL 00001436  006 OF 008 
 
 
 
An ROK source with knowledge of Bosworth's meeting with Wi said 
yesterday that the two diplomats agreed that North Korea hasn't 
changed its position on possessing nuclear weapons and that the 
United States and the ROK would continue to pursue both sanctions 
and dialogue in dealing with the nuclear standoff. 
 
"This sort of approach is something that will take a while to be 
effective," the source said.  "North Korea may have made some 
concessions of late, but in areas other than nuclear weapons.  The 
goal is to try to persuade North Korea to make some conciliatory 
moves in nuclear weapons, too." 
 
Russia is prepared to join the ROK and the United States in 
pressuring North Korea to return to the Six-Party setting, according 
to a Moscow news report. 
 
"Russia is ready to continue working to reach the common goal for 
the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula ... and the creation of 
conditions for the stable socio-economic development of all the 
countries in the region," Alexei Borodavkin, Russia's top nuclear 
representative, told Interfax news agency.  "These goals should be 
reached through negotiations with the participation of the six 
nations," he added, referring to Russia, the United States, China, 
Japan and the two Koreas. 
 
 
BOSWORTH ARRIVAL IN SEOUL SIGNALS MAINTENANCE IN TWO-TRACK APPROACH 
 
(Hankyoreh Shinmun, September 7, 2009, page 2) 
 
By Reporter Lee Je-hoon 
 
While U.S. and S. Korea look for stronger signs of North Korea's 
will to denuclearize, Bosworth leaves open the possibility of a 
visit to Pyongyang and bilateral North Korea-U.S. talks. 
 
Stephen Bosworth, U.S. Special Representative for North Korea 
Policy, said Sunday that while North Korea's freeing of two U.S. 
journalists was a welcome development, he believes there has been no 
fundamental change in North Korea's attitude concerning 
denuclearization. 
 
During a press conference with reporters at the Lotte Hotel in 
Sogong-dong, Seoul, Bosworth said that the U.S. and the ROK agree 
that the core issue is the complete and verifiable denuclearization 
of the Korean Peninsula, and that the nuclear issue requires a 
multilateral solution.  He also added that signs of North Korea's 
continuing nuclear program, including highly enriched uranium (HEU), 
are cause for worry, and that the U.S. would deal with the issue in 
a comprehensive way.  He stressed that he has been satisfied with 
the level of cooperation with the ROK and other partners in 
executing United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1874, 
which calls for the inspection of cargo vessels to and from North 
Korea if states have "reasonable grounds" to believe they contain 
prohibited items. 
 
A high-ranking ROK official who spoke with Bosworth also said that 
while North Korea's recently moves appear to be conciliatory, since 
North Korea has revealed that it continues to make progress in 
developing their nuclear capabilities, there does not appear to be a 
fundamental change in its attitude.  The official also said the ROK 
has decided to continue working closely with relevant nations to 
further the goal of bringing North Korea back to the Six-Party 
Talks. 
 
These statements from both Bosworth and the ROK government official 
suggests that, while North Korea has recently seemed open to a 
dialogue with the U.S. and the ROK, Washington and Seoul do not 
believe there has been a meaningful change concerning Pyongyang's 
will to denuclearize.  The statements also suggest a feeling that 
now is not the time to change the key strategy of the "two track" 
policy promoting both simultaneous dialogue and sanctions based on 
UNSC Resolution 1874.  The high-ranking ROK official's comments 
 
SEOUL 00001436  007 OF 008 
 
 
underscore (the point) that the Lee Administration's North Korea 
policy has changed. 
 
The ROK and the U.S. also reportedly discussed a response to 
Pyongyang's invitation to Bosworth to North Korea.  A high-ranking 
ROK official says although Bosworth is not currently thinking of 
visiting North Korea, if conditions materialize where such a visit 
would aid the situation, a trip is always possible rather than 
sending North Korea the wrong signal. 
 
The official added that conditions must progress further for such 
bilateral North Korea-U.S. talks to take place.  Meanwhile, Bosworth 
left open the possibility of a visit to North Korea and bilateral 
North Korea-U.S. talks, and emphasized that such a visit is not 
immediately possible.  Attention is now focusing on North Korea's 
response. 
 
Bosworth arrived in the ROK on Friday and met with Foreign Minister 
Yu Myung-hwan, Unification Minister Hyun In-taek and Wi Sung-lac, 
Six-Party Talks chief negotiator. 
 
(This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is 
identical to the Korean version.) 
 
 
NORTH KOREA PUTS PRESSURE ON U.S. TO CHOOSE DIALOGUE OR SANCTIONS 
(Hankyoreh Shinmun, September 5, 2009, page 4) 
 
By Reporter Lee Yong-in 
 
Although N. Korea appears to be making concessions, analysts say its 
letter to the UNSC references uranium enrichment capabilities and 
presses U.S. to choose dialogue 
 
In a letter sent to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) on 
Friday in the name of North Korea's Permanent Representative to the 
United Nations, the country accepted some of the conditions set by 
the U.S. for dialogue while also attempting to apply reverse 
pressure on the U.S. to choose between dialogue and sanctions. 
 
Around the time of former U.S. President Bill Clinton's visit to 
North Korea which took place from July 4 to July 5, North Korea 
urged the U.S. to participate in bilateral dialogue through various 
channels.  It also carried out efforts to create conditions 
conducive to bilateral dialogue, including making active moves to 
thaw cold inter-Korean relations such as granting a meeting between 
Hyundai Group Chairwoman Hyun Jung-eun and North Korean leader Kim 
Jong-il and the release of the detained Hyundai Asan employee, Yu 
Seong-jin. 
 
Although the U.S. has taken a positive view of these actions by 
North Korea, (the U.S.)  has adhered to the fixed position that 
these actions are unrelated to the essential issue of North Korea's 
denuclearization.  The U.S. is seeking a political promise of 
denuclearization from North Korea and an agreement to return to the 
Six-Party Talks as conditions for dialogue. 
 
North Korea's "letter" shows a certain degree of responsiveness to 
these demands.  With regard to an expression of intent to 
denuclearize, the letter states that it has "never disavowed the 
denuclearization of the Joseon (Korean) Peninsula and of the world 
in and of itself."  Analysts are speculating that Kim Jong-il made a 
statement along similar lines during former President Clinton's 
visit, but this is the first time it has been formalized in a 
written document.  It is also appears to represent a significant 
retreat from claims made in a statement by North Korea's Foreign 
Ministry on June 15 objecting to UNSC Resolution 1874 (which 
established) sanctions against North Korea.  In that statement, the 
Foreign Ministry said, "Denuclearization has become something that 
can absolutely, utterly never be realized." 
 
In connection with the condition of "agreeing to return to Six-Party 
Talks," the letter says that what North Korea objected to was the 
"composition of the Six-Party Talks."  Analysts are interpreting 
 
SEOUL 00001436  008 OF 008 
 
 
this as a nuanced indication that North Korea has refused to 
participate in the talks because it opposes the arrangement of five 
nations against one.  "North Korea indicates some flexibility with 
regard to the format of the talks," says Kim Yeon-cheol, head of the 
Hankyoreh Peace Research Institute.  However, the letter also 
indicates North Korea's strong aversion to the U.S.'s "two-track 
strategy" of simultaneously pursuing both sanctions and dialogue and 
counters that the U.S. has to choose one or the other.  Analysts are 
saying North Korea's announcement that it is extracting and 
weaponizing plutonium and that its uranium enrichment tests have 
entered their final stage could be seen as a strategy to draw the 
U.S. into bilateral dialogue by stressing that time is not on the 
U.S.'s side. 
 
References to uranium enrichment raise an especially sensitive 
issue, as it is not known precisely what level of technology North 
Korea possesses.  North Korea is saying that the enrichment is for 
"light water reactor development," but some analysts are expressing 
concern that if the enrichment process continues, it could also be 
diverted to military use.  There was also a dispute between North 
Korea and the U.S. over whether North Korea possessed a nuclear 
weapon-grade uranium enrichment program (UEP) which set off the 
"second North Korean nuclear crisis" in 2002.  "North Korea's open 
mention of something that they could be doing in secrecy is part of 
their typical 'discursive diplomacy' intended to maximize their 
negotiation cards," said a one-time senior official in foreign 
affairs and national security.  "There is no other way to find out 
the level of North Korea's uranium enrichment capabilities except 
through discussions and dialogue," the former official added. 
 
(This is a translation provided by the newspaper, and it is 
identical to the Korean version.) 
 
 
TOKOLA