Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BERLIN1175, German Reactions to U.S. Proposals on "Global

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BERLIN1175.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BERLIN1175 2009-09-22 13:03 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Berlin
VZCZCXRO1315
RR RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSL RUEHSR
DE RUEHRL #1175 2651303
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 221303Z SEP 09
FM AMEMBASSY BERLIN
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5270
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUCNFRG/FRG COLLECTIVE
RUEHRC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE USD FAS WASHINGTON DC 0184
UNCLAS BERLIN 001175 
 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR EAID ETRD PREL UNGA GM
SUBJECT:  German Reactions to U.S. Proposals on "Global 
Partnering for Food Security" 
 
REF: STATE 093894, BERLIN 001134 
 
1. (U)  Summary:  While supporting the results of the G-8 
meeting in Washington during the week of September 14, 
Germany prefers to maintain the G-8 response to a global 
partnership on food security in line with agreements reach 
by the Agricultural Ministers in l'Aquilla in April. 
However, Germany will stand in the way of consensus.  End 
Summary. 
 
2. (U)  In follow-up to the G8 meeting in Washington DC on 
September 14-15 regarding world food security, Deputy 
Director for International Affairs in the German Federal 
Ministry of Agriculture Dr. Hans-Christoph Eiden (who was 
also present in WDC) provided some additional detail to the 
German position.  Eiden said that Germany would support the 
summary paper prepared during the WDC meeting.  He pointed 
out that Germany is in favor of the idea of a Global 
Partnership as agreed in l'Aquilla.  However, Germany is 
less interested in a 'Global Partnering for Food Security' 
as proposed by the United States.  Eiden expressed sympathy 
for the position of developing countries who want to be 
treated as equals in the process instead of implementing a 
system of leaders and followers. 
 
3. (U)  Eiden said that Germany is of the opinion that the 
existing structures at the United Nations and at the World 
Bank should be utilized for food security programs since 
this is also in the interest of developing countries. 
Germany is not interested in a new special fund for food 
security.  Eiden said that there is already enough money 
available to perform the needed programs.  He believes that 
it is better to make use of existing structures regardless 
of their deficiencies rather than implementing new systems. 
 
 
4. (U)  However, Eiden also made clear that Germany is open 
to compromise for the sake of progress.  Germany would not 
be interested in blocking any progress and insisting on the 
use of certain structures to secure and improve world food 
supplies.  Eiden was not prepared to further elaborate about 
the German position in the next meetings in New York during 
the UN General Assembly. 
 
 
 
Murphy