Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BEIJING2464, CHINA RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS OF FAA REGULATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BEIJING2464.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BEIJING2464 2009-08-28 05:10 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Beijing
VZCZCXYZ0003
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHBJ #2464 2400510
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 280510Z AUG 09
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5809
INFO RHMFIUU/FAA NATIONAL HQ WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
UNCLAS BEIJING 002464 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EEB/TRA/OTP MEAGAN WALKLET-TIGHE 
FAA FOR CHINA DESK ROBYN CICERO 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: EAIR CH
SUBJECT: CHINA RESPONSE TO VIOLATIONS OF FAA REGULATIONS 
 
REF: (A) STATE 14878; (B) STATE 14879; (C) STATE 28069 
 
1. (SBU) As requested in reftels on violations of Federal aviation 
regulations by Chinese pilots, Econoff presented the case dossiers 
to the Flight Safety Office of the Civil Aviation Authority of China 
(CAAC) on March 23, 2009 (refs A and B) and on April 13, 2009 (ref 
C).  CAAC conducted an investigation, and in written responses dated 
May 12, 2009, reported to Embassy that the following measures in the 
three cases had been taken. 
 
2. (SBU) In the cases of pilots YANG, Benjiang of CA1055 (ref A) and 
DONG, Jianguo of CA1053 (ref B), CAAC's North China Division 
reported they had fined the pilots USD 500 each.  In addition, CAAC 
required YANG and DONG (1) to strictly follow standard procedures, 
including standard calls and cross checks; (2) to improve flight 
preparation both to enhance performance and raise their exam levels; 
(3) to establish a captain responsibility system to improve 
supervision and management of the crew; (4) to conduct real case 
studies on a monthly basis in safety meetings, discussing how to 
deal with special situations; and (5) to enhance CRM (crew resource 
management) training.  CAAC also provided an April 13 letter from 
the pilots' employer, Air China Cargo, confirming the airline's 
action in the case. 
 
3.  (SBU) In the case of pilot ZHANG, Wenshun of CA 986 (ref C), 
CAAC reported the incident to CAAC's North China Regional 
Administration shortly after the incident occurred.  In addition, 
CAAC (1) required ZHANG to take RT (radio telephony) training again; 
(2) informed ZHANG's airline of the incident; (3) conducted a safety 
study and emphasized to readback before acting on an ATC (air 
traffic control) order, except during emergencies; (4) conducted 
English training and testing of all flight members according to 
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) requirements; and 
(5) provided special training to cope with the specific incident 
type.  CAAC also reported that they will continue their supervision 
and inspection of the airline's daily operations. 
 
4. (SBU) Post will email scanned copies of the original responses 
from CAAC to EEB/TRA/OTP and FAA/China Desk contacts. 
 
HUNTSMAN