VZCZCXYZ0003
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0975/01 2250702
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 130702Z AUG 09
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2106
RHMFIUU/USCBP WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC

UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000975 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR ISN/ECC - JFRIEDMAN, ACHURCH, NJOHANSON, AND ROWEN 
STATE FOR EAP/TC - NTALBOT, DPARKER,TMANN 
STATE FOR ISN/MTR - PDURHAM, SBOYER, JMAYES, AND RPALMIERO 
DHS/CBP/INA FOR RGONZALEZ 
DOE/NNSA/INECP FOR TPERRY AND SJONES 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETTC MNUC PARM PREL KSTC KNNP TW
SUBJECT: EXBS: TAIWAN MONTHLY REPORTING CABLE - AUGUST 2009 
 
REF:  Taipei 405 
 
¶I.  BROAD ITEMS OF INTEREST TO ADVISORS AND AGENCY MANAGERS: 
 
None. 
 
II. COMPLETED ACTIONS FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD 
¶A.  MEETINGS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD: 
 
¶1. (SBU) On July 21, the Advisor and the EconChief met with Lin, 
Sheng-Chung, Vice Minister of the Taiwan Ministry of Economic 
Affairs (MOEA).  The meeting was to provide first-hand knowledge of 
EXBS work in Taiwan and to elevate export control discussions above 
the working level. 
 
(SBU) Vice Minister Lin thanked EXBS for the training programs 
conducted since 2007.  He stated that he understands that the 
training portion of EXBS will end in a couple of years.  He also 
stated that it is unclear, at this point, how export control work 
will be managed by MOEA once the ministerial reorganization takes 
affect after 2010.  The Advisor stated that, since MOEA will be 
reorganized next year, this would be an opportune time to elevate 
the work of export controls within MOEA so that it is commensurate 
with countries that are at similar level of development as Taiwan; 
that, currently, Taiwan lags far behind places likes Hong Kong, 
Singapore, and South Korea, in the way export controls is managed. 
He responded that he would look into the issue.  However, a meeting 
with the National Security Council would be helpful if the goal is 
to elevate the work within MOEA. 
 
(SBU)  VM Lin also expressed certain views with regard to the 
on-going US-Taiwan bilateral cooperation.  These views will be sent 
via email to appropriate offices in DC. 
 
¶2. (SBU) On July 24, the Advisor met with Professor Liu, Fu-Kuo of 
Institute of International Relations, National Chengchi University, 
to get a read-out on the WMD Study Group meeting of the Council on 
Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific (CSCAP) that took place in 
Beijing on June 28 - 30.  He said Taiwan and China are finalizing 
their cooperation on translating a WMD manual into Chinese so that 
Taiwan and China can use one manual.  (Note:  Taiwan uses 
traditional Chinese script and China uses simplified Chinese 
script.)  He said even though Taiwan has participated since the 
founding of CSCAP, it has done so as a guest of USCSCAP.  He 
expressed his appreciation for the work of USCSCAP to make Taiwan's 
participation in this NGO group possible.  He hopes that Taiwan can 
be a full CSCAP member in the future.  See reftel A. 
 
¶3.  (SBU) On July 27, the Advisor met with the Chang, Chih-Yu 
(James), Director of the Office of Homeland Security, Executive 
Yuan.  Director Chang transferred in March from the Department of 
Information and Liaison of the Mainland Affairs Council.  While Mr. 
Chang does not have an export control background, he has consulted 
BOFT and has visited Container Security Initiative and Megaports 
operations in Kaohsiung to get a better understanding of US-Taiwan 
cooperation in the nonproliferation area.  He stated that Taiwan's 
biggest concern is industry compliance; Taiwan companies endlessly 
complain about compliance with export controls and how any measure 
to strengthen it will affect their bottom line.  The Advisor 
responded that industry complaint about export controls is not 
unique to Taiwan; that all companies, everywhere complain about 
export controls.  Regardless, export controls is an international 
security issue that all of us must be vigilant in strengthening so 
that no place provides an avenue for proliferation of WMD.  She also 
reiterated that officials should explain to industry what the rules 
are, and how companies can comply with the rules, but in the end, 
officials are responsible for national security and foreign policy, 
not the private sector. 
 
(SBU) Director Chang stated that export controls is not Taiwan's top 
priority.  Additionally, few high-level officials truly understand 
what export controls is and how the management of it affects 
Taiwan's international standing.  Currently, Taiwan simply follows 
the footsteps of the US.  Furthermore, the main concern for Taiwan 
is controlling commodities exported to China.  (Note: Taiwan has 
stricter rules on exports of certain commodities to China than the 
US.) For goods shipped to other countries, such as Iran or North 
Korea, export controls is less of a concern for Taiwan. 
 
(SBU) Director Chang agreed with the advice and comments from the 
Advisor regarding certain deficiencies in Taiwan's export control 
system and ways to remedy them.  He stated he would explore whether 
his office can host regular interagency meetings on export controls 
so that the issues such as elevating export control discussion to a 
higher level; additional personnel commitment; interagency 
coordination and license review; and increase in penalty for 
violations, stay in the forefront of Taiwan authorities' 
discussions. (Note:  An interagency export control committee exists 
within BOFT but that committee has not met for over a year.  When 
repeatedly asked why BOFT does not call an interagency committee 
meeting, the response has been BOFT does not have the personnel to 
work on it.) 
 
(SBU) Director Chang agreed that export control issues need to be 
elevated to a higher level and stated that he would bring up the 
issue during his weekly meeting with Taiwan's Premier.  He also 
stated that he has regular contact with officials of Taiwan National 
Security Council so he would use those opportunities to get 
the 
message across.  (Note:  AIT ADIR raised export control issues with 
the National Security Council Secretary General Su Chi during a 
meeting the week of August 10.  He proposed assigning this portfolio 
to a senior NSC official, raising the level of the office within 
BOFT in charge of this portfolio, and creating an NGO to provide 
information and research on non-proliferation issues to Taiwan 
authorities.  Secretary General Su Chi agreed that Taiwan needs to 
increase priority and instructed his deputy to coordinate these 
efforts.) 
 
(SBU) Director Chang stated, initially, his office would see if a 
task force can be formed to work on the following suggested areas: 
(1) fix the technology controls discrepancy in export control 
regulations; (2) pass legislation to increase penalty for 
violations; (3) allocate additional resource, including creating an 
NGO, for nonproliferation work; and (4) establish a policy-making 
and coordinating body within Taiwan authorities for export controls. 
 
 
(SBU) Director Chang and the Advisor agreed to meet regularly (once 
every one or two months) to check on the progress of the task force. 
 
 
¶B. BLUE LANTERN: 
 
The Advisor conducted two (2) Blue Lantern checks.  Results have 
been directly reported to PM/DDTC. 
 
III. TRAINING CONDUCTED DURING REPORTING PERIOD: 
 
(U) The last of the currently funded ICP workshop took place in 
Taipei on July 13-14. 
 
IV. UPCOMING TRAINING: 
 
¶1. (U) A Commodity Identification Training program, implemented by 
the Department of Energy, is scheduled for August 12-14 in Taipei. 
 
 
¶2. (U) An ICP Administrator Training is scheduled for August 27-28 
in Taipei. 
 
¶3.  (SBU) Export control meetings scheduled to take place in 
Washington, D.C. on September 10 - 11.  The Advisor will accompany 
Taiwan officials to the meetings. 
 
¶V. RED FLAG ISSUES: 
 
None. 
 
POC for this report is Mi-Yong Kim, EXBS Advisor.  Telephone +886 2 
2162 2347. 
 
WANG