VZCZCXRO8952
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1729/01 2100653
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 290653Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4963
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7882
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5552
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 9361
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 3023
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 6069
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0138
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 6780
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 6437

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 TOKYO 001729 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 07/29/09 
 
INDEX: 
(1) USFJ commander: F-22 deployment "benefits Japan," emphasizes 
advantages of Japan-U.S. alliance (Ryukyu Shimpo) 
 
(2) Gist of Q&A session at USFJ Commander Lt. Gen. Rice's news 
conference (Ryukyu Shimpo) 
 
(3) USFJ commander's remark on benefits of F-22 deployment: 
"Nuisance for local residents"; local community wary of permanent 
deployment (Ryukyu Shimpo) 
 
(4) Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura criticizes DPJ policy of 
withdrawing refueling mission in Indian Ocean (Sankei) 
 
(5) LDP manifesto plays up fiscal and security policies to make 
clear distinction from DPJ (Yomiuri) 
 
(6) LDP concentrating on strategy of criticizing DPJ (Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
 
(7) Editorial: DPJ foreign, security policies too ambiguous (Nikkei) 
 
 
(8) Interview with JCP Chairman Shii on 2009 Lower House election 
(Mainichi) 
 
(9) Interview with Gerald Curtis, professor at Columbia University: 
Two-party system likely to take root in Japan (Yomiuri) 
 
(10) Issues to be questioned in 2009 Lower House election: Karel van 
Wolferen urges new government to change relations with bureaucracy 
(Mainichi) 
 
(11) Commentary: Good opportunity to change diplomatic concepts 
(Mainichi) 
 
(12) Government eyes yen loans to secure rare metal supply (Nikkei) 
 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) USFJ commander: F-22 deployment "benefits Japan," emphasizes 
advantages of Japan-U.S. alliance 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 1) (Slightly abridged) 
July 29, 2009 
 
Tokyo - Lt. Gen. Edward Rice, commander of U.S. Forces Japan (USFJ), 
held a news conference at the Japan National Press Club in Tokyo on 
July 28. He gave the following comments on the temporary deployment 
of the advanced F-22 fighters at the U.S. Air Force's Kadena base: 
"The deployment of the top grade aircraft in Okinawa and the 
completion of forward deployment will serve as a factor of stability 
in the region as a whole. Japan will be able to benefit from U.S. 
deterrence with the deployment of the F-22s." He stressed the 
significance of the F-22's presence in Okinawa. 
 
Local community in Kadena objects 
 
With the intense noise produced by the temporary deployment of F-22s 
at the Kadena base, the local residents are demanding the withdrawal 
of the aircraft. Rice's statement is interpreted as an indication of 
 
TOKYO 00001729  002 OF 014 
 
 
a possible permanent stationing of F-22s, and this has aroused local 
objections. 
 
Rice also stated at the news conference: "No other country in the 
world (except for the U.S.) has F-22s. The deployment of this 
aircraft in Japan is made possible through the U.S.-Japan alliance. 
Japan enjoys benefits that many other countries in the world do 
not." 
 
Regarding the position of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) in the 
House of Representatives election of working for the relocation of 
the USFJ's Futenma Air Station outside of Okinawa, Rice said: "(The 
USFJ realignment agreement) is strong as a package. Changing the 
individual elements may result in the weakening of the whole 
package. It is the consistent position of the Japanese and U.S. 
governments that individual components will not be changed." He 
indicated that the existing plan to relocate Futenma to waters off 
Henoko in Nago City is the best option, checking the DPJ's proposal 
on relocation out of Okinawa. 
 
As to the question of reviewing the Japan-U.S. Status of Forces 
Agreement, Rice said that this should be dealt with through the 
improvement of operations. 
 
(2) Gist of Q&A session at USFJ Commander Lt. Gen. Rice's news 
conference 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 2) (Full) 
July 29, 2009 
 
Following is a gisting of the question-and-answer session at the 
news conference of Lt. Gen. Edward Rice, commander of U.S. Forces 
Japan (USFJ): 
 
Q: There are demands in Japan for the review of the USFJ realignment 
agreement and the relocation of the Futenma Air Station out of 
Okinawa or out of Japan. 
 
Rice: Since this is a complex agreement (a package), there are 
certain points that people disagree with. There are many beneficial 
elements in this agreement. Our consistent position is that the 
individual components will not be changed. 
 
Q: There are demands for the revision of the Status of Forces 
Agreement (SOFA) and a review of the (so-called) sympathy budget 
(host nation support). 
 
Rice: There is no need to review the SOFA. We will think about how 
to implement (improvement of operations) at an appropriate time. 
Japan cannot defend the United States due to constitutional 
constraints. One way it can contribute to the alliance relationship 
is through host nation support. 
 
Q: In relation to the U.S. "nuclear umbrella," there are people who 
talk about considering Japan's possession of its own nuclear 
capability. 
 
Rice: U.S. deterrence, including the nuclear umbrella, is working 
powerfully. There is no reason Japan should have its own nuclear 
capability. 
 
Q: Does the deployment of the F-22s contribute to regional 
 
TOKYO 00001729  003 OF 014 
 
 
stability? 
 
Rice: Yes, it does. It also provides a very important training 
opportunity for the Self-Defense Forces. The deployment of F-22s in 
Okinawa is a symbol of the many benefits of the Japan-U.S. 
alliance. 
 
(3) USFJ commander's remark on benefits of F-22 deployment: 
"Nuisance for local residents"; local community wary of permanent 
deployment 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 25) (Full) 
July 29, 2009 
 
Central Okinawa - In reaction to U.S. Forces Japan (USFJ) commander 
Lt. Gen. Edward Rice's remark on July 28 that the temporary 
deployment of F-22 fighters on Kadena Air Base "is made possible by 
the Japan-U.S. alliance, and this is a benefit many countries in the 
world do not enjoy," local communities near the base have begun to 
express concern about the permanent deployment of the aircraft and 
the reinforcement of Kadena's functions. 
 
Chatan Mayor Masaharu Noguni, chair of the liaison group of three 
municipalities on Kadena Air Base, said: "From the U.S. forces' 
standpoint, they may think that they are contributing to the 
Japan-U.S. security arrangements, but from the local residents' 
standpoint, they alone are enduring the nuisance. They are concerned 
that (the remark) may mean the permanent deployment of the 
aircraft." 
 
Mayor Mitsuko Tomon of Okinawa City gave these comments: "Our 
position against the permanent deployment of F-22s remains 
unchanged. The deployment of the F-22s on Kadena will lead to the 
reinforcement of its functions. The USFJ realignment process is 
supposed to reduce the burden on Okinawa, but the excessive burden 
has remained unchanged. Okinawa City demands a stop to measures that 
will reinforce base functions." 
 
Toshiyuki Kinjo, vice chairman of the Kadena Municipal Assembly's 
special committee on base issues, stated: "(The U.S.) may make F-22 
deployment permanent on the ground that F-22s will not be sold to 
Japan. The temporary deployment of F-22s is also an indication of 
the importance attached by the Japanese and U.S. governments to the 
Kadena base. It is doubtful whether the burden on Okinawa will 
become lighter through the USFJ realignment process." 
 
(4) Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura criticizes DPJ policy of 
withdrawing refueling mission in Indian Ocean 
 
SANKEI ONLINE (Full) 
12:20, July 29, 2009 
 
At his news conference on the morning of July 29, Chief Cabinet 
Secretary Takeo Kawamura commented on the policy of the Democratic 
Party of Japan (DPJ) to terminate and withdraw the Maritime 
Self-Defense Force's refueling mission in the Indian Ocean when the 
new special antiterrorism measures law expires in January 2010 if it 
takes over the reins of government. He said: "The continuation of 
this policy is an international request," questioning the DPJ's 
policy. He added: "It seems that the DPJ has not reached an internal 
consensus on this. It is necessary for the party to come up with a 
concrete policy." 
 
TOKYO 00001729  004 OF 014 
 
 
 
(5) LDP manifesto plays up fiscal and security policies to make 
clear distinction from DPJ 
 
YOMIURI (Page 3) (Abridged slightly) 
July 29, 2009 
 
Shinichi Kimura, Political Department 
 
A draft of the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) manifesto (campaign 
pledges) for the forthcoming House of Representatives became clear 
yesterday. The draft manifesto depicts the LDP as a "party of 
responsibility." The manifesto is also tinged with a sense of alarm 
and rivalry against the major opposition Democratic Party of Japan 
(DPJ), which is gaining momentum due to its victories in a series of 
local elections and rising support ratings. It also offers a glimpse 
of the pride of the Aso cabinet, which has taken many economic 
stimulus measures since its inauguration last September. Possibly 
with an eye on the DPJ manifesto which was unveiled on July 27, the 
LDP manifesto also includes some policies that are similar to those 
in the DPJ's. 
 
Prime Minister Taro Aso, who is also the president of the LDP, gave 
a short speech on the LDP manifesto yesterday in which he said: "We 
have a responsibility to turn Japan into a country that can fully 
demonstrate its power and that is appealing to everyone." 
 
In debates in the run-up to the Lower House election, the LDP is set 
to hit the ambiguity of the funding sources and foreign and security 
policies specified in the DPJ manifesto. It will intentionally refer 
to highly controversial topics, such as a consumption tax hike and 
amending the Constitution. The LDP manifesto is designed to do just 
that. 
 
Prime Minister Aso held talks with LDP Election Strategy Council 
Vice-Chairman Yoshihide Suga at a Tokyo restaurant on the night of 
July 27 in which Aso said: "The DPJ plans to lavishly spend money 
but has no specific plans when it comes to where that money should 
come from. The LDP has an economic growth strategy that will 
generate revenues that can be distributed. That is the difference." 
Aso and Suga shared the view that the DPJ manifesto lacks an 
economic growth strategy and means to restore fiscal health. 
 
The draft LDP manifesto underlines the Aso cabinet's efforts, saying 
that it has implemented four sets of economic stimulus measures in 
quick succession. The manifesto pledges to: (1) achieve 2 percent 
economic growth in the latter half of 2010; (2) return the economic 
growth and unemployment rates to 2007 levels by 2011; and (3) put 
the Japanese economy on stable growth track in 2012 and beyond. The 
manifesto also spells out the LDP's determination to proactively 
implement economic stimulus measures for the next two years. 
 
To restore soundness in the nation's finances, the LDP manifesto is 
also designed to achieve a surplus in the primary balance of the 
central and local governments in ten years' time. With respect to a 
consumption tax hike, the manifesto specifies a plan to "make 
preparations to review the rate after the nation's economy turned 
around" in line with the mid-term tax reform program specifying to 
take legislative steps to allow the government to drastically reform 
the tax system, including the consumption tax rate, starting in 
fiscal 2011. This, too, is intended to clarify the difference with 
the DPJ. 
 
TOKYO 00001729  005 OF 014 
 
 
 
On the foreign and security fronts, a plan is highlighted to aim at 
a permanent law governing the overseas dispatch of the Self-Defense 
Forces (SDF). An LDP lawmaker criticized the DPJ, saying, "We cannot 
leave Japan to a party that hesitates to deal with a commonsense 
matter and cannot produce a unified view." 
 
Encompassing former Japan Socialist Party ranks who are cautious 
about the overseas dispatch of the SDF, the DPJ manifesto makes no 
mention of the SDF. Further, in an attempt to elucidate the 
difference with the DPJ manifesto which simply says "if there is any 
shortfall in the Constitution, it will be covered," the LDP 
manifesto includes a review of the government's constitutional 
interpretation that prohibits exercising the right to collective 
self-defense and an early amendment to the Constitution. 
 
Many LDP policies vie with DPJ policies, at the same time. 
 
In the LDP, which has many hereditary lawmakers, there were strong 
objections to prohibiting fielding hereditary candidates, a key 
element in political reform. The DPJ has already decided to prohibit 
relatives within the third degree of kinship, such as children and 
spouses of lawmakers, from running in the same electoral district in 
succession. For this reason, the LDP has decided to restrict 
hereditary candidacies, in the same way as the DPJ, starting in the 
election after the next. 
 
As for the number of Diet seats, the DPJ has announced to reduce the 
number of Lower House representation seats (now set at 180) by 80. 
Out of rivalry, the LDP advocates reducing the number of Lower House 
seats (480) by over 10 percent starting in the election after the 
next and the total number of lower and upper house seats (722) by 
more than 30 percent in ten years' time. 
 
Both the LDP and DPJ have come up with child support measures one 
after another. 
 
The DPJ has announced the creation of a monthly child allowance of 
26,000 yen, while the LDP plans to introduce free education for 
preschool children aged between 3 and 5 over the next four years. 
The DPJ manifesto also includes provision of subsidies equivalent to 
tuition fees to households with public high school students. In 
contrast, the LDP platform advocates the creation of a free high 
school and college education system and a grant-type scholarship 
system strictly for low-income households. 
 
LDP Senior Deputy Secretary-General Nobuteru Ishihara delivered a 
street speech in Tokyo yesterday in which he said: "We will make up 
for anything that is regarded as lacking by the people. We will 
assist in areas that need more help." 
 
Nevertheless, it is unclear whether the LDP manifesto will 
eventually specify the costs required for implementing its policies 
and where the money comes from. The government estimates that free 
preschool education costs 790 billion yen and free high school 
education for low-income households - 22.9 billion yen (subsidies 
equivalent to 100 percent of tuition fees for households making less 
than 2.5 million yen annually and 50 percent of tuition fees for 
households with less than 3.5 million yen). 
 
The repetition of measures helping households is certain to be 
criticized as a doling-out policy. How to wipe away such criticism 
 
TOKYO 00001729  006 OF 014 
 
 
will be a challenge. 
 
The LDP announced yesterday that Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone; 
Economic and Fiscal Policy Minister Yoshimasa Hayashi; and Health, 
Labor and Welfare Minister Yoichi Masuzoe - all Upper House members 
- were appointed effective yesterday as special assistants to the 
secretary general and the Policy Research Council chairman. They 
will play the role of explaining the contents of the LDP manifesto 
and party policies for the upcoming Lower House election. 
 
(6) LDP concentrating on strategy of criticizing DPJ 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
July 29, 2009 
 
The usual pattern in past general elections was that the ruling side 
was in the lead while the opposition camp assumed the offensive. For 
the upcoming House of Representatives election, however, the 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) is on the defensive while the 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) is on the offensive. The LDP has also 
adopted an election strategy of criticizing the other side's 
policies louder than asserting its own policies, acting as if it 
were an opposition party. The LDP gives us the impression that it 
has recognized the DPJ as if it were actually the ruling party. 
 
Cabinet members and senior LDP officials yesterday criticized as 
unrealistic the campaign pledges the DPJ unveiled on July 27 in the 
lead-up to the next general election. Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano 
said: "(The DPJ's policy manifesto) is something like fly fishing 
for an election." State Minister of Consumer Affairs Seiko Noda 
commented: "There must be other motives behind the sweet words." 
 
The LDP is fighting an uphill battle due to Prime Minister Taro 
Aso's unpopularity and a strong view that the LDP's ability has 
reached its limits. Aso can no longer be the "face" of the LDP for 
the election, so he has to refrain from delivering stumping 
speeches. The process of preparing its policy manifesto has also 
been delayed. Under such circumstances, the LDP probably has no 
choice but to thoroughly attack the DPJ. 
 
In attacking the DPJ, the LDP has focused on the DPJ's ability to 
hold the reins of government, as well as the measures inserted in 
its manifesto and the fiscal resources for these measures. The 
ruling party's aim is make the voters feel uneasy of the DPJ taking 
over the reins of government. 
 
Now that a change of government is taking on a touch of becoming a 
real possibility, the LDP has also begun to criticize the DPJ's 
stance as pushing its luck. DPJ President Yukio Hatoyama said in a 
speech on July 26: "I will retire from politics after serving as 
prime minister." Hearing this, a senior LDP member cynically said: 
"The Hatoyama remark insults the people. He talks as if his party 
already grabbed the reins of government. 
 
(7) Editorial: DPJ foreign, security policies too ambiguous 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 29, 2009 
 
There is such a thing as "strategic ambiguity" in diplomatic jargon. 
For example, a country can choose not to reveal whether it has 
weapons of mass destruction or not and use this as deterrence 
 
TOKYO 00001729  007 OF 014 
 
 
against other countries. 
 
In this sense, the foreign and security policies of the Democratic 
Party of Japan (DPJ) in its manifesto (campaign pledges) and Policy 
Index 2009 are full of "strategic ambiguity." This is probably a 
tactic it is using to achieve the immediate goal of winning the 
House of Representatives election. 
 
If it casts away its ambiguity and clearly spells out its standing 
policies, its ability to govern will be questioned and it will not 
be able to win over new supporters. If it comes up with new policies 
in order to take power, it will lose its old followers, and this 
will not be good for the election. Therefore, it has chosen to 
remain ambiguous, which will also help prevent internal strife in 
the party from surfacing. 
 
Perhaps for this reason, a small section on foreign policies is only 
found in the right hand corner of the double-spread page on 
"employment and the economy" after pages upon pages of the 
manifesto. Everything about these policies is in abstract terms, 
such as "contribute to the world with an independent foreign 
policy." 
 
A typical example of an ambiguous policy is the passage "the 
exercise of the right of self-defense is limited exclusively to 
self-defense" on page 16. Following is a quote from the relevant 
section: 
 
"With regard to the right of self-defense, without being bound by 
the hitherto theoretical debate on the right of individual or 
collective self-defense, this right will only be exercised in 
accordance with Article 9 of the Constitution when there is a direct 
threat to Japan's peace and security and when Japan is subject to an 
imminent and unlawful invasion. Force will not be used under all 
other circumstances." 
 
The passage on "without being bound" seems to suggest that the DPJ 
is flexible on the exercise of the right of collective self-defense. 
However, the next sentences make it clear that it will allow only 
the right of individual self-defense. Preceding the passage with 
"without being bound by the hitherto theoretical debate on the right 
of individual or collective self-defense" is a conscious strategy to 
remain ambiguous. 
 
The DPJ's non-inclusion of its opposition to the refueling mission 
of the Maritime Self-Defense Force in the manifesto is regarded as 
an indication of the party's pragmatism. However, (then) President 
Ichiro Ozawa once said that the refueling mission is inseparable 
from the use of force and is, therefore, unconstitutional. The above 
quote suggests that Ozawa's view is still influential. 
 
If the DPJ thinks that ambiguity in foreign policy will enable it to 
respond flexibly after taking over the administration, then it is 
taking a pragmatic line merely as an election campaign tactic. If 
that is the case, the foreign and security policies in its manifesto 
and policy index are just empty words. 
 
We hope that this ambiguity can be eliminated through debate and the 
voters will be presented with an appropriate basis to make their 
judgment. The DPJ should present its pragmatic foreign policies 
openly and compete with the Liberal Democratic Party. There is still 
time to do so. 
 
TOKYO 00001729  008 OF 014 
 
 
 
(8) Interview with JCP Chairman Shii on 2009 Lower House election 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
July 29, 2009 
 
-- What is the meaning of the upcoming House of Representatives 
election? 
 
Shii: The election will offer the public the chance to judge and 
choose the party that they feel should stand at the political helm. 
I want voters to make a decision to put an end to the government run 
by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the New Komeito. The poll 
also will give the public an opportunity to rebuild Japanese 
politics after the LDP-New Komeito coalition administration is 
replaced. I would like voters to consider the future course of Japan 
in the 21st century. 
 
-- There is a possibility that the JCP will be pushed into the 
background of the two major parties, on which all eyes are now being 
focused. 
 
Shii: Although it is often said that party voters will choose 
between the LDP and DPJ, I don't think the public are not troubled 
by this choice. An overwhelming majority of the public wants the 
LDP-New Komeito coalition government to leave. Tremendous efforts 
are required for surfacing, but we are now gradually sensing a good 
response from the public that we will be able to survive if we keep 
going. If we explain to the public how we will rebuild Japan, the 
worth of the JCP will increase. 
 
-- In the campaigning, priority will be given to the proportional 
representation race. What is the JCP's goal? 
 
Shii: Our goal is to win more than 6.5 million votes in the 
proportional representation blocs across the nation. With regard to 
the single-seat constituency system, we will definitely win in the 
No. 1 district in Kyoto. In the Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly 
election, each voter had only one ballot, but voters have two 
ballots (one for the district poll and the other for the 
proportional representation race) in the general election. 
Emphasizing this, we will call the public to write the name of the 
JCP in the proportional representation segment. Voters may be 
worried about the DPJ. There is a strong chance for the JCP to grow 
strong if we can play up our party. 
 
-- The JCP stresses in its manifesto a pledge to protect the daily 
lives of the people. 
 
Shii: During the ten years of the LDP-New Komeito government, both 
the people were deprived of security and hopes for their 
livelihoods. According to a nationwide survey conducted by the 
Ministry of Education, culture, Sports, and Science and Technology, 
only 11 percent of respondents said they would be able to live in 
comfort, while 57 percent responded that they would be badly off. If 
we have hopes, we will be able to endure even in a bad situation. 
But we have neither peace of mind nor hopes. The structural reform 
policy line that allowed business circles and leading companies to 
take arbitrary actions has collapsed. A drastic change in politics 
is needed to protect the daily lives of the people. 
 
-- What is the reason for your party revealing its response to a DPJ 
 
TOKYO 00001729  009 OF 014 
 
 
administration after the election? 
 
Shii: The direct reason is the result of the Tokyo assembly 
election. Chances are strong that a DPJ-led administration will be 
launched. It will be best if the JCP is able to join it immediately. 
But we are not at that stage. We are not forced to make such a 
decision because the DPJ has gained strength. We will take a 
position as a responsible party. 
 
-- Do you mean that the JCP will decide whether to support the DPJ 
on an issue-by-issue basis as a constructive opposition party? 
 
Shii: The JCP (and the DPJ) coincide in views on many issues, 
including abolishing the health insurance system for people aged 75 
and older and the Services and Supports for Persons with 
Disabilities Law, and implementing free high-school education. 
However there are also a lot of issues on which they cannot find 
common ground. The JCP will firmly oppose a consumption tax hike. 
The party will disagree to amending Article 9 of the Constitution. 
We will object to a decrease in the number of Lower House 
proportional representation seats. 
 
-- What your party's response to the election to choose a prime 
minister after the general election? 
 
Shii: The JCP will take independent action in the first poll. Should 
a play-off be conducted, there is a possibility that our party 
members will vote for the DPJ candidate in order to prevent the 
LDP-New Komeito government from keeping in existence. But we will 
not so do unconditionally. Negotiations will be necessary. 
 
-- What are your preconditions? 
 
Shii: It is too early to reveal specific conditions at present. They 
will be revealed gradually through our election campaign. 
 
(9) Interview with Gerald Curtis, professor at Columbia University: 
Two-party system likely to take root in Japan 
 
YOMIURI (Page 1) (Full) 
July 28, 2009 
 
Many Japanese now expect that the upcoming House of Representatives 
election will bring about a change of government. Even if people do 
not have great expectations of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ), 
they are hoping for a switch to a new government because of their 
dislike for the ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP. Such a trend 
is common in other democracies, but for Japan, it is now being seen 
for the first time in the postwar period -- a major political 
change. 
 
Changes in the Japanese society have finally begun to decisively 
affect politics. The support bases of the LDP are noticeably 
starting to crumble. In New York, where I lived as a teenager, the 
Democratic Party operated a powerful electoral machine because of 
the strong sense of community among immigrants. But society soon 
diversified and the community collapsed, destroying the machine as a 
result. The process in New York at that time and the current state 
in Japan are very similar. 
 
Although there is a high probability that the DPJ will assume the 
reins of government, it is uncertain whether the DPJ will continue 
 
TOKYO 00001729  010 OF 014 
 
 
to enjoy the advantage until the end of the long election campaign. 
The LDP has started an offensive against the DPJ's policies. Unless 
the DPJ can respond to the criticism with proper explanations, the 
situation could change again. 
 
I am not worried about U.S.-Japan relations under a DPJ government. 
Since the DPJ has begun to turn pragmatic, I do not think bilateral 
ties will significantly change. If both sides make proposals or 
advice to each other on global warming and other nonmilitary issues, 
I think the two countries will become closer. 
 
I welcome the DPJ's proposal for reviewing the current relationship 
between politicians and bureaucrats. In the Taisho Democracy Era, 
the president of the leading party in the Lower House began to 
assume the premiership, but senior government officials at that time 
were appointed directly by the Emperor. The government has worked 
together with bureaucrats since the Taisho Era (1912-1926). This 
dual system tends to make vague the question of where responsibility 
lies with. 
 
The key point is how to use bureaucrats effectively. The wording 
"emerging from the influence of bureaucrats" should not be used.  If 
the DPJ succeeds in making use of bureaucrats effectively and in 
uniting the ruling parties and the government, the party will be 
able to carry out the most drastic reform since the Taisho Era. 
 
Deputy President Ichiro Ozawa's position and action will also affect 
the situation. I expect his long-cherished desire for a change of 
government to be fulfilled and Mr. Ozawa to become a good advisor 
for the DPJ. But if Mr. Ozawa gives an impression that he is forming 
something like an Ozawa faction, centering on fresh lawmakers, and 
exerts his influence without engaging in any official duty, his 
presence will be similar to that of Mr. Kakuei Tanaka after he 
resigned as prime minister. 
 
I think that a two-party system will take root in Japan in the 
future. Once the DPJ assumes political power, an election will not 
be held for another three to four years. There will be enough time 
for the LDP to rebuild its organization. If the LDP seriously 
considers in what direction Japan should move ahead and if it 
produces a new vision and carries out necessary reform measures 
based on it, its comeback will be fully possible. 
 
If a two-party system is introduced in a society like Japan that 
relative free from internal divisions, it will be difficult to find 
major policy differences between the two parties. If the difference 
between the LDP and the DPJ is small, like the difference between 
Toyota and Nissan, the voters tend to focus on each party leader's 
personal appeal in making a decision. If a rabble-rouser who exudes 
charisma comes on the stage, there is danger that the brake will not 
be applied. 
 
(10) Issues to be questioned in 2009 Lower House election: Karel van 
Wolferen urges new government to change relations with bureaucracy 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 28, 2009 
 
The official election campaign for the July 30 House of 
Representatives election will kick off on Aug. 18. In the Lower 
House election, the possibility of the Democratic Party of Japan 
(DPJ) taking over the reins of government is now moving closer to 
 
TOKYO 00001729  011 OF 014 
 
 
reality. Amid such a situation, the Mainichi Shimbun interviewed 
Karel van Wolferen, writer and professor emeritus at the University 
of Amsterdam, as to what meaning the upcoming election will have for 
Japanese history and society. 
 
The phrase that "it can't be helped" has been a key word for the 
Japanese politics. It was believed that it would be impossible to 
change the political situation. In 1993 when the coalition 
administration, excluding the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), was 
inaugurated, people started anticipating, "A change is possible." 
But expectations were disappointed soon. The reason was that a 
substantial change did not occur because politicians who took over 
the reins of government from the LDP did not work under the existing 
political system. 
 
A two-party system will probably be established in Japan for the 
first time in the postwar period through the upcoming general 
election. The people will decide their fate through the poll, seeing 
it as an opportunity to rebuild Japan. The differences from the 
situation in 1993 (when the LDP fell from power) are that the public 
is looking forward to a drastic change and that a viable opposition 
party (DPJ), which aims to take over political helm and is reliable, 
exists. There is probably a skeptical view that the there will be 
little change in the governments led by the LDP and DPJ. Yet, there 
were little change between the Friends of Constitutional Government 
and the Constitutional Democratic Party, political parties in prewar 
Japan. With a change in government, however, Japan was able to have 
an opportunity to rebuild itself by having fresh politicians take 
part in the non-LDP government. 
 
Over the last decade, Japan's internal politics and international 
status have been adrift. Former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi 
appeared to be a reformer, but such was an illusion. He became a 
"tool" for Finance Ministry officials. With his political method, 
the LDP failed. However, the LDP-led administration has existed, 
because there was no other choice. 
 
If the DPJ assumes the political helm, the prime minister will have 
more power and there will be a change in relations between 
politicians and bureaucrats. However, should (the prime minister) be 
arrogant, he will not be able to run the administration. Many 
bureaucrats think that political drift is not good for Japan. The 
new government will have to find ways to work together with them. 
 
The cabinet meeting held twice a week lasted for only 20 minutes 
after cabinet ministers agreed to what was decided the previous day 
by administrative vice ministers. It is difficult for the prime 
minister have bureaucrats immediately follow his blueprint for 
carrying out a national vision. 
 
Japan's fundamental problem is the nation lacks a political center, 
which we can see in its policy toward the United States. Japan's 
relationship with the United States is unsound. Japan has not been 
able to take independent action in the international community. 
 
DPJ President Yukio Hatoyama will probably take an independent 
position rather than follow the LDP's line. It would be better for 
Japan to keep American at arm's length for the sake of its future 
and peace in Asia. However, since Japan's financial and industrial 
markets are closely connected to the United States, even under a 
DPJ-led government, there will be little change in the Japan-U.S. 
relations. 
 
TOKYO 00001729  012 OF 014 
 
 
 
Many Japanese people are becoming increasingly unhappy with the 
country's political situation. Unless politics show the nation's 
future course, it will be unable to get the public on its side. In 
the 1960s, Japanese people did not make much money but worked long 
hours, with the national goal of becoming an advanced industrial 
country. However, Japan has no such a national goal. 
 
There are probably expectations in Japan that a new government and 
new prime minister will come into being. However, excessive 
expectations are prone to make groundless optimism sprout wings. 
Although the upcoming general election will be the first step to 
improve Japan's situation, a long and rocky path lies ahead for 
Japan. 
 
(11) Commentary: Good opportunity to change diplomatic concepts 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 29, 2009 
 
Comments by Kiichi Fujiwara, professor at University of Tokyo 
Graduate School, as summarized by interviewer Yukiko Yamazaki 
 
The forthcoming House of Representatives election is a rare election 
in Japan which may possibly lead to a change of administration. But 
actually, a change of administration should be the norm for all 
elections. 
 
Historically, there have been powerful single parties in 
parliamentary democracies, such as the Christian Democratic Party of 
Italy or the Institutional Revolutionary Party of Mexico, but they 
eventually disintegrated and lost control of power. This has not 
happened in Japan, where an internationally peculiar prolonged 
one-party rule has been in place. 
 
Even if a Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) administration takes over 
after the election, it will have to give emphasis to continuity in 
foreign policy. Consistency in foreign policy gives the impression 
of a responsible political party. 
 
Nevertheless, a change of administration will be a good opportunity 
to change the assumptions in Japan's diplomacy. For example, Japan 
admitted squarely to its responsibility for aggression on Asian 
countries during the non-LDP Hosokawa coalition government. This 
came even before Japan's official apology through the "Murayama 
Statement" of 1995 and was rated highly at home and abroad. 
 
I believe there are few people in the DPJ right now who want to work 
on history issues. However, taking the initiative and not acting 
after China or the Republic of Korea complains enhances credibility 
and will contribute to actualizing the policy of giving emphasis to 
Asia. 
 
Taking the nuclear issue as an example, after the Obama 
administration came out with its policy of stressing the goal of 
nuclear non-proliferation, it is now easier in Japan to talk about 
non-reliance on nuclear arms in Asian security. This is an 
opportunity to move on to concrete policies, rather than just making 
appeals based on Hiroshima and Nagasaki as symbols. 
 
What is important in the Six-Party Talks on North Korea's nuclear 
issue is Japan's ability to have its say in negotiations centered on 
 
TOKYO 00001729  013 OF 014 
 
 
the nuclear powers, the U.S., Russia, and China. The Japanese 
government is resigned to the fact that nonnuclear powers cannot 
negotiate on the nuclear issue, but that is a mistake. Japan should 
take the lead in nuclear arms reduction. 
 
A nuclear disarmament process led by the nuclear powers will have 
its limitations because it is not possible to ask the other party to 
disarm when one is unwilling to do so. It is necessary for the 
nonnuclear powers to have a stronger voice in disarmament talks to 
spur reciprocal reductions. Other nations will probably be unable to 
complain that Japan is "just talking in clichs" since it is an 
atomic-bombed country. 
 
Japan's ability to send out messages through its foreign policy has 
been weak since World War II. Postwar foreign policy has also been 
extremely narrow in scope, consisting only of Japan-U.S. relations 
and East Asia. Japan also has the responsibility of creating the 
international order as a major power. It cannot afford to say: 
"Middle East? It's none of my business." 
 
(12) Government eyes yen loans to secure rare metal supply 
 
NIKKEI (Top Play) (Slightly abridged) 
July 29, 2009 
 
The government will start to build infrastructure in developing 
countries near deposits of rare metals. It plans to back up Japanese 
firms' participation in such projects by offering yen loans for 
roads, railways and other infrastructure. The government eyes 
projects in Africa, South America, and Asia, where there are still a 
number of undeveloped mines. Rare metals are indispensable for 
making cellular phones, next-generation automobiles, and other 
products. Given this, securing the stable supply of rare metals is 
essential for Japanese industries. The government hopes to secure 
mining rights by deepening ties with resource-producing countries. 
 
China and other emerging countries are stepping up efforts to 
acquire mining rights in exchange for their providing huge amounts 
of financial aid to Africa and other regions. The government has 
also judged it necessary to make active use of its assistance 
program in order to ensure the stable supply of resources. 
 
The government-affiliated Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corp. 
(JOGMEC) under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Economy, Trade 
and Industry will screen infrastructure projects in which Japanese 
firms are to participate. The government will set aside several tens 
of millions of yen as the feasibility study cost for each project. 
The government expects to offer loans mainly for projects to 
construct railways, roads and power plants. 
 
The government will offer loans to projects that are deemed 
profitable and safe in feasible studies. The loan amount for each 
project is expected to be in the tens of billions of yen given their 
large scale. Loan amounts and other details are expected to be 
determined next fiscal year, at the earliest. According to projects, 
additional support will be provided from the Japan Bank for 
International Cooperation (JBIC), Nippon Export and Investment 
Insurance (NEXI). 
 
Nearly 10 projects are slated for screening this fiscal year. They 
include laying railway near a manganese mine in Burkina Faso in 
southern Africa, in which Mitsui & Co. and other firms will 
 
TOKYO 00001729  014 OF 014 
 
 
participate, and linking a bauxite mine with a port in Vietnam, in 
which Itochu Corp. and other firms will take part. 
 
The government has also selected a project to construct 
transportation for electricity in Peru and another project to supply 
electricity needed for mining in Fiji. In developing countries, 
there are a lot of untapped oil and rare metal because of inadequate 
infrastructure. Once infrastructure is built, Japanese companies 
engaged in resource development will find it easier to make inroads. 
Meanwhile, improvement infrastructure will make it easier for 
developing countries to export resources. The government anticipates 
that once it can strengthen relations with developing countries by 
utilizing its yen-loan program and government-affiliated financial 
institutions, it will facilitate Japan to obtain mining rights and 
to improve its energy security. 
 
ZUMWALT