Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09TOKYO1671, DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 07/23/09

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09TOKYO1671.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09TOKYO1671 2009-07-23 07:07 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO4393
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1671/01 2040707
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 230707Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4779
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7755
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5426
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 9234
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 2912
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5943
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0018
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 6660
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 6326
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 TOKYO 001671 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 07/23/09 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Simulation of Lower House election: Battle over 241 seats 
(Mainichi) 
 
(2) Lower House dissolution for general election: Economy, people's 
livelihoods, peace of mind are key words when voters choose between 
LDP or DPJ (Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
(3) LDP meltdown - 2009 Lower House election (Part 1): LDP as 
opposition becomes possibility (Sankei) 
 
(4) Wavering seen in DPJ's foreign policy (Okinawa Times) 
 
(5) Poll on general election (Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Simulation of Lower House election: Battle over 241 seats 
 
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Full) 
July 23, 2009 
 
Fumie Ueno, Yu Takayama 
 
The campaign for the 45th House of Representatives election, with 
official declaration of candidacy set for August 18 and voting 
scheduled for August 30, has essentially begun. The main issue in 
the election is whether the government of the Liberal Democratic 
Party (LDP) and New Komeito will continue or whether a coalition 
government led by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) will take 
over. The alignment of forces is divided into the LDP and New 
Komeito on one side and the DPJ, the Social Democratic Party (SDP), 
and the People's New Party (PNP) on the other. They will be fighting 
a battle to grab 241 seats, which will give them the majority in the 
480-seat Lower House, and 241 seats has been set as the criterion of 
victory. It is possible that both camps will be unable to win 241 
seats, in which case, the Japanese Communist Party (JCP) and the 
independents will hold the casting vote, and there will be 
maneuverings to form a majority. 
 
1) If LDP, New Komeito win majority: Administration sustained, 
"twisted Diet" continues 
 
The goal of the LDP and New Komeito, which is going into the Lower 
House election under adverse conditions, is to "keep the majority by 
the two parties and sustain the administration." (LDP Secretary 
General Hiroyuki Hosoda) While this is a standard of victory set 
considerably lower than the 334 seats they held at the time of the 
Lower House dissolution, these parties have a strong sense of 
crisis. They will look for opportunities to turn the tide in the 
longest ever campaign period -- 40 days - of all elections held 
under the present Constitution. 
 
LDP Election Strategy Council Vice Chairman Yoshihide Suga gave a 
speech in Yokohama on the evening of July 22, where he stressed 
that, "If we plead to the people openly and squarely, the ruling 
parties can win a majority." However, even if these two parties are 
able to retain a majority, the "twisted Diet," where the opposition 
controls the House of Councillors, will continue. It will be very 
difficult for the ruling parties to win over two-thirds of the seats 
- which they succeeded in doing in the Lower House election in 2005, 
 
TOKYO 00001671  002 OF 009 
 
 
when the LDP won a landslide victory. That win enabled them to pass 
bills (rejected by the Upper House) with a second overriding vote in 
the Lower House. If important bills are rejected one after the 
other, the administration may find itself in a stalemate. 
 
If the LDP-New Komeito administration continues after the Lower 
House election, a realignment of political forces is also possible, 
including a "grand coalition" with the DPJ or the recruitment of 
defectors from the ranks of opposition members of the Upper House. 
Certain LDP members pin their hope on collaborating with 
conservative DPJ Diet members, reckoning "if the DPJ fails to 
capture power, this party made up of a hodgepodge of political 
forces will disintegrate." (senior LDP official) 
 
2) DPJ, SDP, PNP win majority: DPJ opts for coalition government 
even with landslide victory 
 
 DPJ President Yukio Hatoyama talked about the party's goal at a 
news conference on July 21: "At the very least, to become the number 
one party, and to win a majority through cooperation among the 
opposition parties." The DPJ has declared its intention to form a 
coalition government with the SDP and the PNP after the Lower House 
election. Its criterion for victory will be winning 241 seats by the 
three parties. 
 
At the time of Diet dissolution, the three parties held a total of 
124 seats. They will have to win almost twice this number of seats 
to grab power. Mainichi Shimbun's nationwide public opinion poll 
(conducted on July 18 and 19) shows that 56 percent of the 
respondents want the DPJ to win the election. Some DPJ members hold 
the bullish view that the party "might be able to win over 250 seats 
single-handedly." (senior DPJ official) 
 
However, the situation in the Upper House remains that the DPJ, the 
SDP, and the PNP together are barely able to control a majority. 
Therefore, even if the DPJ is able to win a majority alone in the 
Lower House, it still intends to form a coalition with the SDP and 
the PNP. It appears that Hatoyama's setting "winning a majority by 
the opposition parties" as the criterion of victory is also out of 
consideration for the need to collaborate with the other parties. 
 
In addition, New Party Nippon leader Yasuo Tanaka and candidates 
endorsed by the DPJ outside the SDP and the PNP, such as independent 
Makiko Tanaka, are also expected to join the coalition if they get 
elected. In the end, these candidates will also be counted in the 
criterion of victory of 241 seats. 
 
3) Ruling, opposition parties evenly matched: JCP, independents to 
hold the key 
 
In case both the LDP-New Komeito camp and the three-party alliance 
of the DPJ, the SDP, and the PNP fail to win a majority and are 
evenly matched, the JCP and the independents are expected to hold 
the casting vote. At an interview with the media on July 21, JCP 
Chairman Kazuo Shii stated that his party "might vote for the DPJ" 
in the election of the prime minister after the election "in order 
not to prolong the LDP-New Komeito government," but this will be "on 
several conditions." 
 
The JCP envisions playing the role of a "constructive opposition 
party," meaning it will vote for DPJ President Hatoyama in the 
runoff vote for the prime minister, helping the election of "Prime 
 
TOKYO 00001671  003 OF 009 
 
 
Minister Hatoyama," but the party will not participate in the 
coalition government and will make demands of the DPJ to realize its 
policy proposals. In such a case, the DPJ-led coalition 
administration will be a minority government which will be unable to 
enact laws without opposition cooperation, rendering it very 
unstable. 
 
Both the LDP and the DPJ are also expected to work fiercely to win 
over politicians of the "third force," such as former Administrative 
Reform Minister Yoshimi Watanabe and former Minister of Economy, 
Trade, and Industry Takeo Hiranuma, who left the LDP, in order to 
form a majority. This process will have the potential of spawning a 
"grand coalition" of the LDP and the DPJ, mutual recruitment of 
defectors by both parties, or other forms of realignment of 
political forces. 
 
(2) Lower House dissolution for general election: Economy, people's 
livelihoods, peace of mind are key words when voters choose between 
LDP or DPJ 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 9) (Excerpts) 
July 22, 2009 
 
The dissolution of the Lower House has effectively signaled the 
launch of election campaigning. Although the accelerating economic 
recession has entered a temporary lull, the employment situation is 
worsening. Economic stimulus measures will become the greatest bone 
of contention in the long campaign period. As people become 
increasingly dissatisfied, the key issues for voters when choosing 
between the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) and the Democratic Party 
of Japan (DPJ) will likely be improvement of people's livelihoods 
and peace of mind. 
 
Pork-barrel spending noticeable: Gap in approaches to sales tax seen 
between ruling and opposition parties 
 
Public appeal 
 
Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano during a press conference held after a 
cabinet meeting on July 21 proudly noted the effects of the economic 
stimulus measures implemented under his initiative, "Based on an 
assessment of the current stage, the Aso administration's stimulus 
package is a success." 
 
The Aso administration was launched right after the failure of 
Lehman Brothers, a leading U.S. security house, in September last 
year. The administration has compiled four budgets, including extra 
budgets as stimulus measures. In particular, the size of the fiscal 
2009 budget was the largest ever, totaling roughly 14 trillion yen. 
The government in July revised upward its overall assessment of the 
economy for the third consecutive month, citing that personal 
consumption has picked up due to a tax break for 
environmentally-friendly cars, the showcase of the package, and the 
effect of assistance for the purchases of environmentally-friendly 
home electronic appliances. 
 
Some market players said that making a bullish assessment amid a 
rising jobless rate is premature. However, the government is making 
a frantic effort to demonstrate the administration's accomplishments 
to the public. 
 
Acrimonious exchanges 
 
TOKYO 00001671  004 OF 009 
 
 
 
Blasting the series of stimulus measures taken by the government as 
pork-barrel largesse, the DPJ intends to take a second look at 
budget request guidelines, which indicate a general framework for 
the fiscal 2010 budget. 
 
However, a number of the proposals that the DPJ is going to include 
in its manifesto are also pork-barrel largesse. The amount needed to 
finance its policy proposals - child allowances of 26,000 yen per 
month, toll-free highways, free high school education, and abolition 
of the provisional gas tax - comes to between 16 trillion yen and 17 
trillion yen. The DPJ says that it will secure fiscal resources by 
recombining budget items and reforming the way tax money is used. 
The ruling parties are criticizing the DPJ's plan as mere fantasy. 
 
Dire straits 
 
As a result of the extensive public spending repeatedly implemented 
by the Aso administration, fiscal reconstruction and spending 
reform, the symbols of the Koiuzmi reform, have been put on hold. 
 
The long-term outstanding debt held by the central and local 
governments is estimated to reach 816 trillion yen as of the end of 
fiscal 2009. Its share in the gross domestic product (GDP) stands at 
approximately 170 PERCENT , the worst level among developed 
countries. 
 
Vice Finance Minister Tango, who served as secretary to former Prime 
Minister Koizumi, accepted unprecedented measures, saying, "They are 
necessary in order to deal with an unanticipated challenge." 
However, future generations will be forced to pick up the bill for 
mountains of loans. 
 
Even if stimulus packages are settled for the time being, securing 
stable fiscal resources to finance social security spending is bound 
to become a challenge. The natural increase in social security 
spending will be as much as 1 trillion yen a year. If there are no 
fiscal resources to finance that amount, it will have to be covered 
by loans. 
 
Prime Minister Taro Aso on the 21st stressed the need to raise the 
sales tax. However, a tax increase must be premised on economic 
recovery. It is unclear when the economy will turn around. The DPJ's 
policy is not to raise the sales tax for four years. 
 
Taking immediate stimulus measures is important. However, it is an 
unavoidable challenge for Japan, which has entered the age of a 
declining birthrate and a rapidly aging society, to take a second 
look at social security and the tax system. All political parties 
need to squarely face the challenge of formulating policies, even if 
they are painful for voters. 
 
(3) LDP meltdown - 2009 Lower House election (Part 1): LDP as 
opposition becomes possibility 
 
SANKEI (Top play) (Abridged slightly) 
July 22, 2009 
 
Fumito Ishibashi 
 
"I have only one wish. I hope that all of the candidates for the 
Lower House general election present today will be able to come back 
 
TOKYO 00001671  005 OF 009 
 
 
here again," Prime Minister Aso said with tears in his eyes in a 
meeting of all the LDP Diet members held at noon on July 21 on the 
ninth floor of the Liberal Democratic Party's (LDP) headquarters. 
Pressed by anti-Aso forces, the LDP leadership held the meeting, but 
contrary to expectations, almost no critical views on Aso were 
raised. Since Aso had been concerned that the meeting would become a 
venue for the LDP to disgrace itself in public, he appeared to be 
delighted with the outcome. 
 
The party headquarters was filled with tension until immediately 
before the opening of the meeting. If the pro- and anti-Aso forces 
clashed head-on with each other in the meeting, there would be a 
risk of the LDP entering the election split into two groups. For 
that reason, Aso started his speech in a serious manner, saying: 
 
"Before expressing my determination and readiness for a Lower House 
dissolution, I have to offer my apology. I am deeply sorry for my 
statements and the flip-flops that triggered public anxiety and 
distrust in politics, resulting in the drop in the LDP's support 
rate." 
 
Referring to the LDP's six consecutive losses in the recent local 
elections, Aso said: "That's because of my lack of ability," and 
continued: 
 
"The LDP is a truly conservative party. We are like-minded persons 
gathered under the conservative ideal. Now is the time for us to 
demonstrate the LDP's potential cultivated through history and 
tradition. Let us overcome this national crisis." 
 
His remarks set the current of the meeting. LDP members praised Aso 
in succession. Makoto Koga, who recently resigned as chairman of the 
LDP Election Strategy Council, raised his voice: "Let's go forth 
today to the battle fields or election districts!" 
 
Another reason for the calming down of the drive to oust Aso is that 
LDP lawmakers supporting the move to unseat Aso came under severe 
criticism from LDP supporters who have been fed up with the 
political brouhaha in the LDP. 
 
Also at a meeting of the LDP Lower House members immediately before 
the Lower House plenary session, tensions ran high for a moment when 
former Secretary General Hidenao Nakagawa, who directly urged Aso to 
step down, raised his hand and took the podium to speak. Nakagawa, 
however, said in a calm voice: "The Prime Minister's speech today 
was very good. We will accept the Prime Minister's resolution with 
grace and fight in the election with party unanimity." Nakagawa 
offered his hand to Aso. 
 
Asp lost his temper when he was asked a question by a reporter, 
replying: "Do you think I will easily answer a question that is 
premised on a defeat in the election? We are now about to fight in 
the election. We will do anything we can do to win the election." 
 
The reporters tenaciously asked him how he would take responsibility 
if the ruling coalition loses a majority of the Lower House. Since a 
strong adverse wind is blowing against the LDP, the possibility of 
the party becoming an opposition party is moving closer to reality. 
Why did Aso dissolve the Lower House at the risk of defeat? 
 
The only possible reason is that he predicted that if the LDP went 
into the general election after he resigned and a new president were 
 
TOKYO 00001671  006 OF 009 
 
 
elected, there would be a strong possibility that the LDP would 
split. He thought that he could protect the LDP if he took 
responsibility by dissolving the chamber, since the chances were 
slim that the LDP would win under the leadership of a new 
president. 
 
It is difficult for the LDP to reach a consensus even on foreign and 
security policy. LDP members only care about the results of public 
opinion polls. Many lawmakers think only about what action will be 
most advantageous for them. 
 
Leaders of the anti-Aso movement, including former Secretary General 
Tsutomu Takebe, received LDP recognition letters from Aso and took 
photos with him. Witnessing their complete change, Aso gave a wry 
smile. 
 
At a press conference yesterday, Aso stressed: 
 
"I will ask the people to focus on which party can fulfill its 
responsibility. If I fail to keep my promise, I will take 
responsibility. In order to fulfill my political responsibility, I 
will risk my political life to fight in the election. 
 
Aso's "declaration of war" against the Democratic Party of Japan 
(DPJ) questioned the LDP's pride as administrative party. 
 
(4) Wavering seen in DPJ's foreign policy 
 
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 2) (Full) 
July 23, 2009 
 
2009 House of Representatives Election Reporting Team 
 
Senior U.S. government officials and Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) 
Diet members had dinner at a Japanese restaurant in Akasaka, Tokyo, 
in mid-June. One Diet member said repeatedly: "You don't have to 
worry when we take over the administration. We will come up with 
acceptable policies for sure," trying to alleviate the U.S. side's 
concerns about DPJ policy. 
 
Equal relations with the U.S. 
 
The U.S. side has so far rejected all the DPJ's demands - relocation 
of the U.S. forces' Futenma Air Station outside of Okinawa, review 
of the U.S. Forces Japan realignment plans, and revision of the 
Japan-U.S. Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA). 
 
On the other hand, the DPJ has also been seen to be "wavering" in 
its foreign policy, with President Yukio Hatoyama indicating that 
the Maritime Self-Defense Force refueling mission in the Indian 
Ocean will continue for the time being after the change of 
administration, for instance. 
 
On the early evening of July 19, Hatoyama told the audience at the 
Okinawa City Auditorium: "At least, if you (the Okinawan people) are 
united in your wish for relocation outside the prefecture, we will 
have to take positive action in that direction." 
 
In reaction to this, a senior Ministry of Defense (MOD) official 
chuckles: "He has set the condition of 'if the Okinawan people are 
united in their wish' for the first time. My impression is that with 
the assumption of power fast approaching, (the DPJ) is retreating 
 
TOKYO 00001671  007 OF 009 
 
 
little by little." The U.S. has been pressuring the DPJ since late 
2008, telling it that the U.S. side will not agree to policy change. 
This MOD official is optimistic that, "Unmistakably, the pressure 
has worked. I don't think there will be any major change in security 
policy." 
 
However, a mid-ranking DPJ Diet member denies this: "Our position on 
various issues will remain unchanged after taking over the 
administration. If we change our position, the people will criticize 
us for 'merely mouthing good words'." 
 
This is based on the perception: "It is impossible to take a 
confrontational attitude toward the U.S. and turn things upside down 
overnight. We aim to be an equal negotiating partner and change 
things gradually" (same source). Foreign and defense policies will 
mostly not be included in the DPJ's manifesto (campaign pledges) to 
be published shortly. The above Diet member explains that: "Detailed 
explanation is necessary in this area. Short, unclear phrases will 
rather give rise to misunderstanding," so such policies will be 
written into an annotation document accompanying the manifesto. 
 
Policy on Futenma to be watched 
 
With regard to the relocation of Futenma outside the prefecture, a 
senior Okinawa Prefectural Government official is furious: "It is 
irresponsible (to talk about that) without even offering a concrete 
alternative plan." "The fastest way to the return of Futenma is to 
relocate to Nago, which is willing to accept the facility." He 
doubts the feasibility of relocation outside the prefecture. 
 
Even Nago, the relocation site, is cautious about this proposal. 
Nago Mayor Yoshikazu Shimabukuro points out: "There is no concrete 
proposal on where to move the facility. I think this will be 
difficult to implement." Yasumasa Oshiro, head of Henoko district, 
is also doubtful: "It would be best if the facility were not brought 
here, but is it possible (to overturn) an agreement between Japan 
and U.S. just because the administration has changed?" 
 
An opposition Nago city assembly member who is against the 
relocation says: "I have hopes for relocation outside Okinawa with 
the change of administration, but this will not be easy to 
accomplish." He intends to watch moves in the DPJ. 
 
(5) Poll on general election 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full) 
July 20, 2009 
 
Questions & Answers 
(Figures shown in percentage) 
 
Q: To what extent are you interested in the forthcoming general 
election for the House of Representatives? 
 
Very interested 44.1 
Somewhat interested 38.7 
Not very interested 13.2 
Not interested at all 3.9 
Don't know (D/K) + no answer (N/A) 0.1 
 
Q: Which political party's candidate are you going to vote for in 
your single-seat constituency in the general election? 
 
TOKYO 00001671  008 OF 009 
 
 
 
Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) 16.1 
Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ or Minshuto) 34.1 
New Komeito (NK) 2.8 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) 2.1 
Social Democratic Party (SDP or Shaminto) 0.9 
People's New Party (PNP or Kokumin Shinto) 0.1 
Reform Club (RC or Kaikaku Kurabu) --- 
New Party Nippon (NPN or Shinto Nippon) --- 
Other political parties, groups --- 
Independent candidate 1.7 
None 3.6 
Undecided 37.5 
D/K+N/A 1.1 
 
Q: Which political party are you going to vote for in your 
proportional representation bloc? 
 
LDP 15.6 
DPJ 36.2 
NK 4.2 
JCP 3.4 
SDP 1.2 
PNP 0.1 
RC --- 
NPN --- 
Other political parties, groups --- 
None 3.4 
Undecided 34.7 
D/K+N/A 1.2 
 
Q: What do you weigh the most when you vote in the general 
election? 
 
Social security, such as pension and healthcare 40.9 
Economy, job security 30.7 
Taxation, such as consumption tax 8.4 
Decentralization, administrative reform 6.9 
Constitutional reform 1.9 
Foreign relations, national security 2.3 
Politics and money 4.4 
Political heredity 1.2 
Other answers 0.6 
D/K+N/A 2.7 
 
Q: Are you going to vote in the forthcoming election? 
 
Yes for sure (including early voting) 75.4 
Yes if possible 21.1 
No 3.0 
D/K+N/A 0.5 
 
Q: What form of government would you like to see after the next 
general election? 
 
LDP-led coalition government 14.8 
DPJ-led coalition government 39.3 
LDP-DPJ grand coalition 16.7 
New framework through political realignment 20.8 
D/K+N/A 8.4 
 
Q: When comparing Prime Minister Taro Aso and DPJ President Yukio 
 
TOKYO 00001671  009 OF 009 
 
 
Hatoyama, who do you think is more appropriate for prime minister? 
 
Taro Aso 21.0 
Yukio Hatoyama 48.4 
D/K+N/A 30.6 
 
Q: Is there a political party you usually support? 
 
Yes 32.1 
No 67.1 
D/K+N/A 0.8 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "yes" to the foregoing question) 
Then, which political party do you support? 
 
LDP 47.8 
DPJ 31.0 
NK 8.9 
JCP 5.7 
SDP 3.8 
PNP 0.1 
RC --- 
NPN --- 
Other political parties, groups --- 
D/K+N/A 2.7 
 
Q: (Only for those who answered "no" to the foregoing question) If 
you were to support a political party, which political party would 
you like to choose? 
 
LDP 18.0 
DPJ 43.1 
NK 1.8 
JCP 2.7 
SDP 1.4 
PNP 0.3 
RC 0.2 
NPN --- 
Other political parties, groups --- 
Still none 31.4 
D/K+N/A 1.1 
 
Q: Do you support the Aso cabinet? 
 
Yes 20.6 
No 72.8 
D/K+N/A 6.6 
 
Polling methodology: This survey was conducted across the nation on 
July 18-19 by Kyodo News Service on a computer-aided random digit 
dialing (RDD) basis. Among randomly generated telephone numbers, 
those actually for household use with one or more eligible voters 
totaled 1,766. Answers were obtained from 1,243 persons. 
 
ZUMWALT