

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
2011/08/25
2011/08/26
2011/08/27
2011/08/28
2011/08/29
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
Department of State
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
American Consulate Hyderabad
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Koror
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Consulate Kaduna
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Majuro
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Nogales
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Ponta Delgada
Consulate Peshawar
Consulate Perth
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Sydney
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US OFFICE FSC CHARLESTON
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AORC
AS
AF
AM
AJ
ASEC
AU
AMGT
APER
ACOA
ASEAN
AG
AFFAIRS
AR
AFIN
ABUD
AO
AEMR
ADANA
AMED
AADP
AINF
ARF
ADB
ACS
AE
AID
AL
AC
AGR
ABLD
AMCHAMS
AECL
AINT
AND
ASIG
AUC
APECO
AFGHANISTAN
AY
ARABL
ACAO
ANET
AFSN
AZ
AFLU
ALOW
ASSK
AFSI
ACABQ
AMB
APEC
AIDS
AA
ATRN
AMTC
AVIATION
AESC
ASSEMBLY
ADPM
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AGOA
ASUP
AFPREL
ARNOLD
ADCO
AN
ACOTA
AODE
AROC
AMCHAM
AT
ACKM
ASCH
AORCUNGA
AVIANFLU
AVIAN
AIT
ASECPHUM
ATRA
AGENDA
AIN
AFINM
APCS
AGENGA
ABDALLAH
ALOWAR
AFL
AMBASSADOR
ARSO
AGMT
ASPA
AOREC
AGAO
ARR
AOMS
ASC
ALIREZA
AORD
AORG
ASECVE
ABER
ARABBL
ADM
AMER
ALVAREZ
AORCO
ARM
APERTH
AINR
AGRI
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
ACDA
AEMED
ARC
AMGMT
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU
ABMC
AIAG
ALJAZEERA
ASR
ASECARP
ALAMI
APRM
ASECM
AMPR
AEGR
AUSTRALIAGROUP
ASE
AMGTHA
ARNOLDFREDERICK
AIDAC
AOPC
ANTITERRORISM
ASEG
AMIA
ASEX
AEMRBC
AFOR
ABT
AMERICA
AGENCIES
AGS
ADRC
ASJA
AEAID
ANARCHISTS
AME
AEC
ALNEA
AMGE
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ANTONIO
ASO
AFINIZ
ASEDC
AOWC
ACCOUNT
ACTION
AMG
AFPK
AOCR
AMEDI
AGIT
ASOC
ACOAAMGT
AMLB
AZE
AORCYM
AORL
AGRICULTURE
ACEC
AGUILAR
ASCC
AFSA
ASES
ADIP
ASED
ASCE
ASFC
ASECTH
AFGHAN
ANTXON
APRC
AFAF
AFARI
ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS
AX
ALAB
ASECAF
ASA
ASECAFIN
ASIC
AFZAL
AMGTATK
ALBE
AMT
AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN
AGUIRRE
AAA
ABLG
ARCH
AGRIC
AIHRC
ADEL
AMEX
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AORCD
ARAS
AINFCY
AFDB
ACBAQ
AFDIN
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
ALANAZI
ABDULRAHMEN
ABDULHADI
ATRD
AEIR
AOIC
ABLDG
AFR
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
ASECCASC
ARG
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
AFU
ATPDEA
ALL
ASECE
ANDREW
BL
BU
BR
BF
BM
BEXP
BTIO
BO
BG
BMGT
BX
BC
BK
BA
BD
BB
BT
BLUE
BE
BRUSSELS
BY
BH
BGD
BN
BP
BBSR
BRITNEY
BWC
BIT
BTA
BTC
BUD
BBG
BEN
BIOS
BRIAN
BEXB
BILAT
BUSH
BAGHDAD
BMENA
BFIF
BS
BOUTERSE
BGMT
BELLVIEW
BTT
BUY
BRPA
BURMA
BESP
BMEAID
BFIO
BIOTECHNOLOGY
BEXD
BMOT
BTIOEAID
BIO
BARACK
BLUNT
BEXPASECBMGTOTRASFIZKU
BURNS
BUT
BHUM
BTIU
BI
BAIO
BCW
BOEHNER
BGPGOV
BOL
BASHAR
BIMSTEC
BOU
BITO
BZ
BRITNY
BIDEN
BBB
BOND
BFIN
BTRA
BLR
BIOTECH
BATA
BOIKO
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BSSR
BAYS
BUEINV
BEXT
BOQ
BORDER
BEXPC
BEXPECONEINVETRDBTIO
BEAN
CG
CY
CU
CO
CS
CI
CASC
CA
CE
CDG
CH
CTERR
CVIS
CB
CFED
CLINTON
CAC
CRIME
CPAS
CMGT
CD
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CM
CL
CR
CWC
CNARC
CJAN
CBW
CF
CACS
CONS
CIC
CHR
CTM
CW
COM
CT
CN
CARICOM
CIDA
CODEL
CROS
CTR
CHIEF
CBSA
CIS
CVR
CARSON
CDC
COE
CITES
COUNTER
CEN
CV
CONTROLS
CLOK
CENTCOM
COLIN
CVISPRELPGOV
CBD
CNAR
CONDOLEEZZA
CASA
CZ
CASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTMXJM
CWG
CHAMAN
CHENEY
CRIMES
CPUOS
CIO
CAFTA
CKOR
CRISTINA
CROATIA
CIVS
COL
COUNTERTERRORISM
CITEL
CAMBODIA
CVPR
CYPRUS
CAN
CDI
CITIBANK
CONG
CAIO
CON
CJ
CTRYCLR
CPCTC
CKGR
CSW
CUSTODIO
CACM
CEDAW
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CWCM
CONDITIONS
CMP
CEA
CDCE
COSI
CGEN
COPUOS
CFIS
CASCC
CENSUS
CENTRIC
CBC
CCSR
CAS
CHERTOFF
CONTROL
CDB
CHRISTOF
CHAO
CHG
CTBT
CCY
COMMERCE
CHALLENGE
CND
CBTH
CDCC
CARC
CASCR
CICTE
CHRISTIAN
CHINA
CMT
CYNTHIA
CJUS
CHILDREN
CANAHUATI
CBG
CBE
CMGMT
CEC
CRUZ
CAPC
COMESA
CEPTER
CYPGOVPRELPHUM
CVIA
CPPT
CONGO
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
CPA
CPU
CCC
CGOPRC
COETRD
CAVO
CFE
CQ
CITT
CARIB
CVIC
CLO
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CIAT
CONGRINT
CUL
CNC
CMAE
CHAD
CIA
CSEP
COMMAND
CENTER
CIP
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CASE
CHELIDZE
CPC
CEUDA
DR
DJ
DA
DEA
DEMOCRATIC
DOMESTIC
DPOL
DTRA
DHS
DRL
DPM
DEMARCHE
DY
DPRK
DEAX
DO
DEFENSE
DARFR
DOT
DARFUR
DHRF
DTRO
DANIEL
DC
DOJ
DB
DOE
DHSX
DCM
DAVID
DELTAVIOLENCE
DCRM
DPAO
DCG
DOMESTICPOLITICS
DESI
DISENGAGEMENT
DIPLOMACY
DRC
DOC
DK
DVC
DAC
DEPT
DS
DSS
DOD
DE
DAO
DOMC
DEM
DIEZ
DEOC
DCOM
DEMETRIOS
DMINE
DPKO
DDD
DCHA
DHLAKAMA
DMIN
DKEM
DEFIN
DCDG
EAIR
ECON
ETRD
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
ETTC
ENRG
EMIN
ECPS
EG
EPET
EINV
ELAB
EU
ECONOMICS
EC
EZ
EUN
EN
ECIN
EWWT
EXTERNAL
ENIV
ES
ESA
ELN
EFIS
EIND
EPA
ELTN
EXIM
ET
EINT
EI
ER
EAIDAF
ETRO
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECTRD
EUR
ECOWAS
ECUN
EBRD
ECONOMIC
ENGR
ECONOMY
EFND
ELECTIONS
EPECO
EUMEM
ETMIN
EXBS
EAIRECONRP
ERTD
EAP
ERGR
EUREM
EFI
EIB
ENGY
ELNTECON
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
ECOSOC
EEB
EINF
ETRN
ENGRD
ESTH
ENRC
EXPORT
EK
ENRGMO
ECO
EGAD
EXIMOPIC
ETRDPGOV
EURM
ETRA
ENERG
ECLAC
EINO
ENVIRONMENT
EFIC
ECIP
ETRDAORC
ENRD
EMED
EIAR
ECPN
ELAP
ETCC
EAC
ENEG
ESCAP
EWWC
ELTD
ELA
EIVN
ELF
ETR
EFTA
EMAIL
EL
EMS
EID
ELNT
ECPSN
ERIN
ETT
EETC
ELAN
ECHEVARRIA
EPWR
EVIN
ENVR
ENRGJM
ELBR
EUC
EARG
EAPC
EICN
EEC
EREL
EAIS
ELBA
EPETUN
EWWY
ETRDGK
EV
EDU
EFN
EVN
EAIDETRD
ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ
ETEX
ESCI
EAIDHO
EENV
ETRC
ESOC
EINDQTRD
EINVA
EFLU
EGEN
ECE
EAGRBN
EON
EFINECONCS
EIAD
ECPC
ENV
ETDR
EAGER
ETRDKIPR
EWT
EDEV
ECCP
ECCT
EARI
EINVECON
ED
ETRDEC
EMINETRD
EADM
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
ETAD
ECOM
ECONETRDEAGRJA
EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS
ESSO
ETRG
ELAM
ECA
EENG
EITC
ENG
ERA
EPSC
ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC
EIPR
ELABPGOVBN
EURFOR
ETRAD
EUE
EISNLN
ECONETRDBESPAR
ELAINE
EGOVSY
EAUD
EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN
EINVETRD
EPIN
ECONENRG
EDRC
ESENV
EB
ENER
ELTNSNAR
EURN
ECONPGOVBN
ETTF
ENVT
EPIT
ESOCI
EFINOECD
ERD
EDUC
EUM
ETEL
EUEAID
ENRGY
ETD
EAGRE
EAR
EAIDMG
EE
EET
ETER
ERICKSON
EIAID
EX
EAG
EBEXP
ESTN
EAIDAORC
EING
EGOV
EEOC
EAGRRP
EVENTS
ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL
ETRDEMIN
EPETEIND
EAIDRW
ENVI
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
EPEC
EDUARDO
EGAR
EPCS
EPRT
EAIDPHUMPRELUG
EPTED
ETRB
EPETPGOV
ECONQH
EAIDS
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EAIDAR
EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN
ESF
EINR
ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN
EIDN
ETRK
ESTRADA
EXEC
EAIO
EGHG
ECN
EDA
ECOS
EPREL
EINVKSCA
ENNP
ELABV
ETA
EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN
EUCOM
EAIDASEC
ENR
END
EP
ERNG
ESPS
EITI
EINTECPS
EAVI
ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID
ELTRN
EADI
ELDIN
ELND
ECRM
EINVEFIN
EAOD
EFINTS
EINDIR
ENRGKNNP
ETRDEIQ
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EAIDNI
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
EAIT
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
EWWI
ENERGY
ELB
EINDETRD
EMI
ECONEAIR
ECONEFIN
EHUM
EFNI
EOXC
EISNAR
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EIN
EFIM
EMW
ETIO
ETRDGR
EMN
EXO
EATO
EWTR
ELIN
EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN
EINVETC
ETTD
EIQ
ECONCS
EPPD
ESS
EUEAGR
ENRGIZ
EISL
EUNJ
EIDE
ENRGSD
ELAD
ESPINOSA
ELEC
EAIG
ESLCO
ENTG
ETRDECD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ECINECONCS
FR
FI
FAO
FJ
FTA
FOR
FTAA
FMLN
FISO
FOREIGN
FAS
FAC
FM
FINANCE
FREEDOM
FINREF
FAA
FREDERICK
FORWHA
FINV
FBI
FARM
FRB
FETHI
FIN
FARC
FCC
FCSC
FSC
FO
FRA
FWS
FRELIMO
FNRG
FP
FAGR
FORCE
FCS
FIR
FREDOM
FLU
FEMA
FDA
FRANCIS
FRANCISCO
FERNANDO
FORCES
FK
FSI
FIGUEROA
FELIPE
FT
FMGT
FCSCEG
FA
FIXED
FINR
FINE
FDIC
FOI
FAOAORC
FCUL
FAOEFIS
FKLU
FPC
GG
GV
GR
GM
GOI
GH
GE
GT
GA
GAERC
GJ
GY
GCC
GAMES
GOV
GB
GERARD
GTIP
GPI
GON
GZ
GU
GEF
GATES
GUTIERREZ
GATT
GUAM
GMUS
GONZALEZ
GESKE
GBSLE
GL
GEORGE
GWI
GAZA
GLOBAL
GABY
GC
GAO
GANGS
GUEVARA
GOMEZ
GOG
GUIDANCE
GIWI
GKGIC
GF
GOVPOI
GPOV
GARCIA
GTMO
GN
GIPNC
GI
GJBB
GPGOV
GREGG
GTREFTEL
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HO
HR
HK
HUMANRIGHTS
HA
HILLARY
HUMAN
HU
HSTC
HURI
HYMPSK
HUMANR
HIV
HAWZ
HHS
HDP
HN
HUM
HUMANITARIAN
HL
HLSX
HILLEN
HUMRIT
HUNRC
HYDE
HTCG
HRPGOV
HKSX
HOSTAGES
HT
HIJAZI
HRKAWC
HRIGHTS
HECTOR
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HRC
HRETRD
HUD
HOURANI
HSWG
HG
HARRIET
HESHAM
HIGHLIGHTS
HOWES
HI
HURRICANE
HSI
HNCHR
HTSC
HARRY
HRECON
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IR
IAEA
IC
INTELSAT
IS
IN
ICAO
IT
IDB
IMF
ISRAELI
ICRC
IO
IMO
IDP
IV
ICTR
IWC
IE
ILO
ITRA
INMARSAT
IAHRC
ISRAEL
ICJ
IRC
IRAQI
ID
IPROP
ITU
INF
IBRD
IRAQ
IPR
ISN
IEA
ISA
INR
INTELLECTUAL
ILC
IACO
IRCE
ICTY
IADB
IFAD
INFLUENZA
IICA
ISAF
IQ
IOM
ISO
IVIANNA
INRB
ITECIP
INL
IRAS
ISSUES
INTERNAL
IRMO
IGAD
IRNB
IMMIGRATION
IATTC
ITALY
IRM
ICCROM
ITALIAN
IFRC
ITPGOV
ISCON
IIP
ITEAGR
INCB
IBB
ICCAT
ITPREL
ITTSPL
ITIA
ITECPS
ITRD
IMSO
IMET
INDO
ITPHUM
IRL
ICC
IFO
ISLAMISTS
IP
INAUGURATION
IND
IZPREL
IEFIN
INNP
ILAB
IHO
INV
IL
ITECON
INT
ITEFIS
IAII
IDLO
ITEIND
ISPA
IDLI
IZPHUM
ISCA
ITMARR
IBPCA
ICES
ICSCA
ITEFIN
IK
IRAN
IRS
INRA
ITAORC
ITA
IAZ
IASA
ITKIPR
ISPL
ITER
IRDB
INTERPOL
IACHR
ITELAB
IQNV
ITPREF
IFR
ITKCIP
IOC
IEF
ISNV
ISAAC
IEINV
INPFC
ITELTN
INS
IACI
IFC
IA
IMTS
IPGRI
IDA
ITKTIA
ILEA
ISAJ
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
ICG
IF
IPPC
IACW
IUCN
IZEAID
IWI
ITTPHY
IBD
IRPE
ITF
INRO
ISTC
IBET
JO
JM
JA
JP
JCIC
JOHNNIE
JKJUS
JOHN
JONATHAN
JAMES
JULIAN
JUS
JOSEPH
JOSE
JIMENEZ
JE
JEFFERY
JS
JAT
JN
JUAN
JOHANNS
JKUS
JAPAN
JK
JEFFREY
JML
JAWAD
JSRP
KPKO
KIPR
KWBG
KPAL
KDEM
KTFN
KNNP
KGIC
KTIA
KCRM
KDRG
KWMN
KJUS
KIDE
KSUM
KTIP
KFRD
KMCA
KMDR
KCIP
KTDB
KPAO
KPWR
KOMC
KU
KIRF
KCOR
KHLS
KISL
KSCA
KGHG
KS
KSTH
KSEP
KE
KPAI
KWAC
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KPRP
KVPR
KAWC
KUNR
KZ
KPLS
KN
KSTC
KMFO
KID
KNAR
KCFE
KRIM
KFLO
KCSA
KG
KFSC
KSCI
KFLU
KMIG
KRVC
KV
KVRP
KMPI
KNEI
KAPO
KOLY
KGIT
KSAF
KIRC
KNSD
KBIO
KHIV
KHDP
KBTR
KHUM
KSAC
KACT
KRAD
KPRV
KTEX
KPIR
KDMR
KMPF
KPFO
KICA
KWMM
KICC
KR
KCOM
KAID
KINR
KBCT
KOCI
KCRS
KTER
KSPR
KDP
KFIN
KCMR
KMOC
KUWAIT
KIPRZ
KSEO
KLIG
KWIR
KISM
KLEG
KTBD
KCUM
KMSG
KMWN
KREL
KPREL
KAWK
KIMT
KCSY
KESS
KWPA
KNPT
KTBT
KCROM
KPOW
KFTN
KPKP
KICR
KGHA
KOMS
KJUST
KREC
KOC
KFPC
KGLB
KMRS
KTFIN
KCRCM
KWNM
KHGH
KRFD
KY
KGCC
KFEM
KVIR
KRCM
KEMR
KIIP
KPOA
KREF
KJRE
KRKO
KOGL
KSCS
KGOV
KCRIM
KEM
KCUL
KRIF
KCEM
KITA
KCRN
KCIS
KSEAO
KWMEN
KEANE
KNNC
KNAP
KEDEM
KNEP
KHPD
KPSC
KIRP
KUNC
KALM
KCCP
KDEN
KSEC
KAYLA
KIMMITT
KO
KNUC
KSIA
KLFU
KLAB
KTDD
KIRCOEXC
KECF
KIPRETRDKCRM
KNDP
KIRCHOFF
KJAN
KFRDSOCIRO
KWMNSMIG
KEAI
KKPO
KPOL
KRD
KWMNPREL
KATRINA
KBWG
KW
KPPD
KTIAEUN
KDHS
KRV
KBTS
KWCI
KICT
KPALAOIS
KPMI
KWN
KTDM
KWM
KLHS
KLBO
KDEMK
KT
KIDS
KWWW
KLIP
KPRM
KSKN
KTTB
KTRD
KNPP
KOR
KGKG
KNN
KTIAIC
KSRE
KDRL
KVCORR
KDEMGT
KOMO
KSTCC
KMAC
KSOC
KMCC
KCHG
KSEPCVIS
KGIV
KPO
KSEI
KSTCPL
KSI
KRMS
KFLOA
KIND
KPPAO
KCM
KRFR
KICCPUR
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KNNB
KFAM
KWWMN
KENV
KGH
KPOP
KFCE
KNAO
KTIAPARM
KWMNKDEM
KDRM
KNNNP
KEVIN
KEMPI
KWIM
KGCN
KUM
KMGT
KKOR
KSMT
KISLSCUL
KNRV
KPRO
KOMCSG
KLPM
KDTB
KFGM
KCRP
KAUST
KNNPPARM
KUNH
KWAWC
KSPA
KTSC
KUS
KSOCI
KCMA
KTFR
KPAOPREL
KNNPCH
KWGB
KSTT
KNUP
KPGOV
KUK
KMNP
KPAS
KHMN
KPAD
KSTS
KCORR
KI
KLSO
KWNN
KNP
KPTD
KESO
KMPP
KEMS
KPAONZ
KPOV
KTLA
KPAOKMDRKE
KNMP
KWMNCI
KWUN
KRDP
KWKN
KPAOY
KEIM
KGICKS
KIPT
KREISLER
KTAO
KJU
KLTN
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KEN
KQ
KWPR
KSCT
KGHGHIV
KEDU
KRCIM
KFIU
KWIC
KNNO
KILS
KTIALG
KNNA
KMCAJO
KINP
KRM
KLFLO
KPA
KOMCCO
KKIV
KHSA
KDM
KRCS
KWBGSY
KISLAO
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KCRI
KX
KWWT
KPAM
KVRC
KERG
KK
KSUMPHUM
KACP
KSLG
KIF
KIVP
KHOURY
KNPR
KUNRAORC
KCOG
KCFC
KWMJN
KFTFN
KTFM
KPDD
KMPIO
KCERS
KDUM
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KHSL
KEPREL
KAWX
KIRL
KNNR
KOMH
KMPT
KISLPINR
KADM
KPER
KTPN
KSCAECON
KA
KJUSTH
KPIN
KDEV
KCSI
KNRG
KAKA
KFRP
KTSD
KINL
KJUSKUNR
KQM
KQRDQ
KWBC
KMRD
KVBL
KOM
KMPL
KEDM
KFLD
KPRD
KRGY
KNNF
KPROG
KIFR
KPOKO
KM
KWMNCS
KAWS
KLAP
KPAK
KHIB
KOEM
KDDG
KCGC
LE
LY
LO
LI
LG
LH
LS
LANTERN
LABOR
LA
LOG
LVPR
LT
LU
LTTE
LORAN
LEGATT
LAB
LN
LAURA
LARREA
LAS
LB
LOPEZ
LOTT
LR
LINE
LAW
LARS
LMS
LEBIK
LIB
LBY
LOVE
LEGAT
LEE
LEVINE
LEON
LAVIN
LGAT
LV
LPREL
LAOS
MOPS
MASS
MARR
MCAP
MO
MX
MZ
MI
MNUC
MW
MY
MARRGH
MU
MD
MEDIA
MARAD
ML
MA
MTCRE
MC
MIL
MG
MR
MAS
MCC
MP
MT
MPOS
MCA
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MK
MDC
MV
MAR
MNUR
MOOPS
MFO
MEPN
MCAPN
MCGRAW
MJ
MORRIS
MTCR
MARITIME
MAAR
MEPP
MAP
MILITANTS
MOPPS
MN
MEX
MINUSTAH
MASSPGOVPRELBN
MOPP
MF
MENDIETA
MARIA
MCAT
MUKASEY
MICHAEL
MMED
MANUEL
MEPI
MMAR
MH
MINORITIES
MHUC
MCAPS
MARTIN
MARIE
MONUC
MOPSGRPARM
MNUCPTEREZ
MUNC
MONTENEGRO
MIK
MGMT
MILTON
MGL
MESUR
MILI
MCNATO
MORALES
MILLENNIUM
MSG
MURRAY
MOTO
MCTRE
MIGUEL
MRSEC
MGTA
MCAPMOPS
MRRR
MACP
MTAA
MARANTIS
MCCONNELL
MAPP
MGT
MIKE
MARQUEZ
MCCAIN
MIC
MOHAMMAD
MOHAMED
MNU
MOROCCO
MASSPHUM
MFA
MTS
MLS
MSIG
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MNUCH
MED
MNVC
MILITARY
MINURSO
MNUCUN
MATT
MARK
MBM
MRS
MPP
MASSIZ
MAPS
MNUK
MILA
MTRRE
MAHURIN
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NS
NPT
NU
NL
NASA
NV
NG
NP
NSF
NK
NA
NEW
NE
NSG
NPG
NR
NOAA
NRRC
NATIONAL
NGO
NT
NATEU
NAS
NEA
NEGROPONTE
NAFTA
NKNNP
NSSP
NLD
NLIAEA
NON
NRR
NTTC
NTSB
NANCY
NAM
NCD
NONE
NH
NARC
NELSON
NMFS
NICOLE
NDP
NADIA
NEPAD
NCTC
NGUYEN
NIH
NET
NIPP
NOK
NLO
NERG
NB
NSFO
NSC
NATSIOS
NFSO
NTDB
NC
NRC
NMNUC
NEC
NUMBERING
NFATC
NFMS
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NEI
NATGAS
NZUS
NCCC
NRG
NATOOPS
NOI
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NARCOTICS
NORAD
OFDP
OSCE
OPIC
OTRA
OIIP
OPRC
OEXC
OVIP
OREP
OECD
OPDC
OIL
ODIP
OCS
OIC
OAS
OCII
OHUM
OSCI
OVP
OPCW
ODC
OMS
OPBAT
OPEC
ORTA
OFPD
OECV
OECS
OPCD
OTR
OUALI
OM
OGIV
OXEM
OPREP
OPC
OTRD
ORUE
OSD
OMIG
OPDAT
OCED
OIE
OLYAIR
OLYMPICS
OHI
OMAR
ODPC
OPDP
ORC
OES
OCEA
OREG
ORA
OPCR
OFDPQIS
OPET
OPDCPREL
OXEC
OAU
OTHER
OEXCSCULKPAO
OFFICIALS
OIG
OFDA
OPOC
OASS
OSAC
OARC
OEXP
ODAG
OIF
OBAMA
OF
OA
OCRA
OFSO
OCBD
OSTA
OAO
ONA
OTP
OPS
OVIPIN
OPAD
OTRAZ
OBS
ORCA
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OPPI
OASC
OSHA
OTAR
OIPP
OPID
OSIC
ORECD
OSTRA
OASCC
OBSP
OTRAO
OPICEAGR
OCHA
OHCHR
ORED
OIM
OGAC
OTA
OI
OPREC
OTRAORP
OPPC
OESC
ON
PGOV
PREL
PK
PTER
PINR
PO
PHUM
PARM
PREF
PINF
PRL
PM
PINS
PROP
PALESTINIAN
PE
PBTS
PNAT
PHSA
PL
PA
PSEPC
POSTS
POLITICS
POLICY
POL
PU
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOG
PARALYMPIC
PGOC
PNR
PREFA
PMIL
POLITICAL
PROV
PRUM
PBIO
PAK
POV
POLG
PAR
POLM
PHUMPREL
PKO
PUNE
PROG
PEL
PROPERTY
PKAO
PRE
PSOE
PHAS
PNUM
PGOVE
PY
PIRF
PRES
POWELL
PP
PREM
PCON
PGOVPTER
PGOVPREL
PODC
PTBS
PTEL
PGOVTI
PHSAPREL
PD
PG
PRC
PVOV
PLO
PRELL
PEPFAR
PREK
PEREZ
PINT
POLI
PPOL
PARTIES
PT
PRELUN
PH
PENA
PIN
PGPV
PKST
PROTESTS
PHSAK
PRM
PROLIFERATION
PGOVBL
PAS
PUM
PMIG
PGIC
PTERPGOV
PSHA
PHM
PHARM
PRELHA
PELOSI
PGOVKCMABN
PQM
PETER
PJUS
PKK
POUS
PTE
PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN
PERM
PRELGOV
PAO
PNIR
PARMP
PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO
PHYTRP
PHUML
PFOV
PDEM
PUOS
PN
PRESIDENT
PERURENA
PRIVATIZATION
PHUH
PIF
POG
PERL
PKPA
PREI
PTERKU
PSEC
PRELKSUMXABN
PETROL
PRIL
POLUN
PPD
PRELUNSC
PREZ
PCUL
PREO
PGOVZI
POLMIL
PERSONS
PREFL
PASS
PV
PETERS
PING
PQL
PETR
PARMS
PNUC
PS
PARLIAMENT
PINSCE
PROTECTION
PLAB
PGV
PBS
PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN
PKNP
PSOCI
PSI
PTERM
PLUM
PF
PVIP
PARP
PHUMQHA
PRELNP
PHIM
PRELBR
PUBLIC
PHUMKPAL
PHAM
PUAS
PBOV
PRELTBIOBA
PGOVU
PHUMPINS
PICES
PGOVENRG
PRELKPKO
PHU
PHUMKCRS
POGV
PATTY
PSOC
PRELSP
PREC
PSO
PAIGH
PKPO
PARK
PRELPLS
PRELPK
PHUS
PPREL
PTERPREL
PROL
PDA
PRELPGOV
PRELAF
PAGE
PGOVGM
PGOVECON
PHUMIZNL
PMAR
PGOVAF
PMDL
PKBL
PARN
PARMIR
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PDD
PRELKPAO
PKMN
PRELEZ
PHUMPRELPGOV
PARTM
PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN
PPEL
PGOVPRELPINRBN
PGOVSOCI
PWBG
PGOVEAID
PGOVPM
PBST
PKEAID
PRAM
PRELEVU
PHUMA
PGOR
PPA
PINSO
PROVE
PRELKPAOIZ
PPAO
PHUMPRELBN
PGVO
PHUMPTER
PAGR
PMIN
PBTSEWWT
PHUMR
PDOV
PINO
PARAGRAPH
PACE
PINL
PKPAL
PTERE
PGOVAU
PGOF
PBTSRU
PRGOV
PRHUM
PCI
PGO
PRELEUN
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PMR
PRTER
PNG
PGOVPHUMKPAO
PRELECON
PRELNL
PINOCHET
PAARM
PKPAO
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
POPDC
PRELC
PHUME
PER
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVPZ
PGOVKCRM
PAUL
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PPEF
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PPGOV
PLN
PRELSW
PHUMS
PRF
PEDRO
PHUMKDEM
PUNR
PVPR
PATRICK
PGOVKMCAPHUMBN
PRELA
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PRFE
POGOV
PBT
PAMQ
RU
RP
RS
RW
RIGHTS
REACTION
RSO
REGION
REPORT
RIGHTSPOLMIL
RO
RELATIONS
REFORM
RM
RFE
RCMP
RELFREE
RHUM
ROW
RATIFICATION
RI
RFIN
RICE
RIVERA
REL
ROBERT
RECIN
REGIONAL
RICHARD
REINEMEYER
RODHAM
RFREEDOM
REFUGEES
RF
RA
RENE
RUS
RQ
ROBERTG
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RAY
RPREL
RAMON
RENAMO
REFUGEE
RAED
RREL
RBI
RR
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RAMONTEIJELO
RGY
ROY
REUBEN
ROME
RAFAEL
REIN
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RPEL
REF
RWANDA
RLA
RELAM
RIMC
RSP
REO
ROSS
RPTS
REID
RUPREL
RMA
REMON
SA
SP
SOCI
SY
SNAR
SENV
SMIG
SCUL
SN
SW
SU
SG
SZ
SR
SC
SK
SH
SNARCS
SEVN
SPCE
SARS
SO
SNARN
SM
SF
SECTOR
ST
SL
SIPDIS
SI
SIPRS
SAARC
SYR
START
SOE
SIPDI
SENU
SE
SADC
SIAORC
SSH
SENVENV
SCIENCE
STR
SCOM
SNIG
SCPR
STEINBERG
SANC
SURINAME
SULLIVAN
SPC
SENS
SECDEF
SOLIC
SCOI
SUFFRAGE
SOWGC
SOCIETY
SKEP
SERGIO
SCCC
SPGOV
SENVSENV
SMIGBG
SENC
SIPR
SAN
SPAS
SEN
SECURITY
SHUM
SOSI
SD
SXG
SPECIALIST
SIMS
SARB
SNARIZ
SASEC
SYMBOL
SPECI
SCI
SECRETARY
SENVCASCEAIDID
SYRIA
SNA
SEP
SOCIS
SECSTATE
SETTLEMENTS
SNARM
SELAB
STET
SCVL
SEC
SREF
SILVASANDE
SCHUL
SV
SANR
SGWI
SCUIL
SYAI
SMIL
STATE
SHI
SEXP
STEPHEN
SENSITIVE
SECI
SNAP
STP
SNARPGOVBN
SCUD
SNRV
SKCA
SPP
SOM
STUDENT
SOIC
SCA
SCRM
SWMN
SGNV
SUCCESSION
SOPN
SMAR
SASIAIN
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SENVSXE
SRYI
SENVQGR
SACU
SASC
SWHO
SNARKTFN
SBA
SOCR
SCRS
SWE
SB
SENVSPL
SUDAN
SCULUNESCO
SNARPGOVPRELPHUMSOCIASECKCRMUNDPJMXL
SAAD
SIPRNET
SAMA
SUBJECT
SMI
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOI
SOCIPY
SOFA
SIUK
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SOCIKPKO
SENG
SENVKGHG
SENVEFISPRELIWC
STAG
SPSTATE
SMITH
SOC
TSPA
TU
TH
TX
TRGY
TRSY
TC
TNGD
TBIO
TW
TSPL
TPHY
TT
TZ
TS
TIP
TI
TINT
TV
TD
TF
TL
TERRORISM
TO
TN
TREATY
TERROR
TURKEY
TAGS
TP
TK
TRV
TECHNOLOGY
TPSA
TERFIN
TG
TRAFFICKING
TCSENV
TRYS
TREASURY
THKSJA
THANH
TJ
TSY
TIFA
TBO
TORRIJOS
TRBIO
TRT
TFIN
TER
TPSL
TBKIO
TOPEC
TR
TA
TPP
TIO
THPY
TECH
TSLP
TIBO
TRADE
TOURISM
TE
TDA
TAX
TERR
TRAD
TVBIO
TNDG
TIUZ
TWL
TWI
TBIOZK
TSA
THERESE
TRG
TWRO
TSRY
TTPGOV
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TRIO
TPKO
TIA
TGRY
TSPAM
TREL
TNAR
TBI
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TRY
TBID
UK
UNHCR
UNGA
UN
USTR
UY
UNSC
US
UP
UNHRC
UNMIK
UNEP
UV
UNESCO
UG
USAID
UZ
UNO
USEU
UNCND
UNRWA
UNAUS
UNSCD
UNDP
USSC
UNRCCA
UNTERR
USUN
USDA
UEU
UNCRED
UNIFEM
UNCHR
UNIDROIT
UNPUOS
UNAORC
UNDC
USTDA
UNCRIME
USNC
UNCOPUOS
UNCSD
USAU
UNFPA
UNIDO
UPU
UNCITRAL
UNVIE
UA
USOAS
UNICEF
UNSCE
UNSE
UR
UNECE
UNMIN
USTRPS
UNODC
UNCTAD
UNAMA
UNAIDS
UNFA
UNFICYP
USTRUWR
UNCC
UNFF
UDEM
USG
UNOMIG
UUNR
USMS
USOSCE
USTRRP
UNG
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNRCR
UGA
UNSCR
UNMIC
UNTAC
UNOPS
UNION
UMIK
UNCLASSIFIED
UNMIL
USPS
USCC
UNA
UNDOC
UAE
UNUS
UNMOVIC
URBALEJO
UNCHC
USGS
UNDEF
USNATO
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UEUN
UX
USTA
UNBRO
UNIDCP
UE
UNWRA
USDAEAID
UNCSW
UNCHS
UNGO
USOP
UNDESCO
UNPAR
UNC
USTRD
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
USTRIT
UNCDF
UNREST
UNHR
USPTO
UNFCYP
UNGAC
USCG
VE
VM
VT
VZ
VETTING
VTPREL
VTIZ
VN
VC
VISIT
VOA
VIP
VTEAID
VEPREL
VEN
VA
VTPGOV
VIS
VTEG
VTOPDC
VANESSA
VANG
VISAS
VATICA
VXY
VILLA
VTEAGR
VTUNGA
VTPHUM
VY
VO
VENZ
VI
VTTBIO
VAT
WTO
WHO
WFP
WZ
WA
WWT
WI
WTRO
WBG
WHTI
WS
WIPO
WEF
WMD
WMN
WHA
WOMEN
WMO
WE
WFA
WEBZ
WCI
WFPOAORC
WFPO
WAR
WIR
WILCOX
WHITMER
WAKI
WRTO
WILLIAM
WB
WM
WSIS
WEWWT
WCL
WTRD
WEET
WETRD
WW
WTOEAGR
WHOA
WAEMU
WGC
WWBG
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WEU
WALTER
WARREN
WEOG
WATKINS
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 09TOKYO1572, JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/10/09
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09TOKYO1572.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
09TOKYO1572 | 2009-07-10 02:32 | 2011-08-26 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | Embassy Tokyo |
VZCZCXRO3741
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1572/01 1910232
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 100232Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4467
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7493
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 5164
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8969
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 2667
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5683
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0388
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 6411
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 6081
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 12 TOKYO 001572
SIPDIS
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA;
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION;
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE;
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN,
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR;
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA.
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT: JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/10/09
Index:
G-8 Summit and Aso diplomacy:
1) President Obama at G-8 Summit presses accelerator on nuclear
disarmament, but Japan concerned about absence of nuclear-power
China (Mainichi)
2) Expanded meeting at G-8 Summit releases statement on restarting
WTO negotiations, but for Japan the bottleneck will continue to be
agriculture (Mainichi)
3) Prime Minister Aso finds diplomacy tough going at the G-8 Summit:
He is the only leader to speak out on North Korea issue (Sankei)
4) President Medvedev brings no new proposal on the northern
territories to his G-8 summit meeting with Prime Minister Aso
(Asahi)
Defense and security issues:
5) North Korea started its missile program in the late 1970s, using
dual-use equipment obtained from Japan (Sankei)
6) U.S. and Japan will hold director-general-level talks next month
on foreign and security affairs under the 2+2 framework (Nikkei)
7) Former high-level official reveals that around 2001, senior
Foreign Ministry official ordered the U.S.-Japan secret nuclear-pact
document destroyed (Asahi)
8) METI Minister Nikai told be Iraqi official that Japan may have
the edge in obtaining rights to develop oil in Iraq (Sankei)
Opinion polls:
9) Poll on voter consciousness by Nikkei finds over 90 PERCENT of
electorate intends to go to the polls in next Lower House election;
DPJ favored 40 PERCENT to 26 PERCENT over LDP (Nikkei)
10) In Yomiuri election series poll, 41 PERCENT of electorate say
they will vote DPJ in the single district races, compared to only 23
PERCENT who plan to vote LDP (Yomiuri)
Political agenda:
11) Lower House election now likely to be held after the end of
August (Tokyo Shimbun)
12) DPJ (Democratic Party of Japan) planning vote of no confidence
in Aso Cabinet, but the real intention is to make sure the prime
minister stays on into the election (Tokyo Shimbun)
13) Aso's face is conspicuously absent from campaign posters for the
LDP (Tokyo Shimbun)
14) Lower House committee pursuing DPJ President Hatoyama for his
political organization's falsifying funding records with names of
dead people (Mainichi)
Articles:
1) Nuclear disarmament gains momentum; G-8 members support Obama
strategy
MAINICHI (Page 3) (Excerpts)
July 10, 2009
Kazuhiko Kusano, Shunji Oki, L'Aquila
The Group of Eight Summit (L'Aquila Summit) adopted on July 8 a
statement pledging to create a situation toward a world without
nuclear weapons. With all the participating countries having agreed
to the policy of U.S. President Barack Obama, who aims at a
TOKYO 00001572 002 OF 012
nuclear-free world, expectations have swollen that moves for nuclear
disarmament will pick up speed at once. Nevertheless, there still
remain many tough challenges partly because the stance of China, one
of the major nuclear powers, remains unclear and such countries as
North Korea and Iran are pursuing nuclear development. Will the
statement be able to give a boost to the effort to abolish nuclear
weapons?
Japan concerned about China's absence
Takashi Sudo
The Japanese government welcomes the G-8 statement. But China's
absence from that scene worries Tokyo, which fears that if the
United States and Russia go ahead and reduce their nuclear weapons,
the weight of China's nuclear weapons will increase and trust in the
U.S. nuclear umbrella that protects Japan might decline.
The G-8 statement urges all countries to take further nuclear
disarmament steps with greater transparency. Japan's interpretation
of this is that China is included in "all countries," according to a
senior Foreign Ministry official. But China's stance remains
unchanged, namely, that the United States and Russia should pursue
nuclear disarmament first.
Japan and the United States are scheduled to hold official
working-level talks later this month to discuss nuclear strategies,
such as the U.S. umbrella. Placed under the U.S. nuclear umbrella,
Japan finds itself on the horns of a dilemma. The planned formal
talks carry a strong aspect of the United States defusing Japan's
anxiety. The Foreign Ministry official said, "Having talks is good,
but nothing has been nailed down effectively."
Trust in U.S. main factor
Comment by Osaka Jogakuin College Professor Mitsuru Kurosawa
The statement that includes the phrase "a world without nuclear
weapons" reflect a change in times.
The United States has made a huge shift from the former Bush
administration's unilateralism to a stance of multilateralism. The
declaration of nuclear disarmament not only by the United States and
Russia but also by all major countries will give a boost to future
talks. It can be said that the major nations have acknowledged that
President Obama is "serious" about achieving nuclear disarmament.
Progress is expected to be made in the future in three areas
advocated by President Obama: nuclear disbarment, nuclear
nonproliferation, and measures against nuclear terrorism.
Nevertheless, the trends of North Korea and Iran are a concern.
Nuclear development by those two countries will not have a direct
impact on nuclear disarmament talks, but it might undermine the
atmospherics of the other good trend.
2) Leaders of G-8 member nations, emerging countries come up with
goal of reaching final agreement at WTO Doha Round
MAINICHI (Page 4) (Excerpts)
July 10, 2009
Kiyohiro Akama, Kesuke Ota
TOKYO 00001572 003 OF 012
Nozomi Saito, L'Aquila
Leaders of the Group of Eight (G-8) major nations and five emerging
countries, such as China and India, have come up with a goal of
reaching a final agreement at the World Trade Organization (WTO)
Doha Round (multi trade liberalization talks) before the end of
¶2010. At work behind the move is their strong determination to
revitalize trade, which has come to an impasse due to the impact of
the ongoing financial crisis, for the purpose of turning around the
economy, by establishing a free trade system. However, in actual
talks, negotiations have repeatedly been derailed with the interests
of various countries fiercely clashing with each other. As such,
there is no knowing whether an agreement can be reached.
Japan goes on defensive, suffering setback over agriculture
Export-oriented Japan is positive about an early settlement of the
Doha Round, which will lead to cuts in trade tariffs. However,
sources connected with the agricultural sector, an area that is
being urged to open its market, is still strongly opposed the Doha
Round. Adjustments of opinions on the domestic front will likely
face challenges.
Japan has constantly been forced to play defense regarding the
agriculture area at WTO talks. It has been struggling to increase
the share of key items, which are exempt from tariff cuts. As a
result, it has been unable to make its presence felt, eclipsed by
confrontations between the U.S. and emerging countries in overall
talks on mined and manufactured products.
Japan called for setting the share of key items at 8 PERCENT of all
items at the informal ministerial meeting in July last year.
However, the WTO came up with an adjudication proposal for setting
the share at 6 PERCENT . Since the overall talks fell through at the
time, Japan did not have to accept the adjudication proposal.
However, the prevailing view among government officials is that
there is a slim chance of Japan's stance on the agricultural area
being accepted, as one negotiator put it.
Japan has been protecting farmers by imposing high tariffs on many
agricultural products. However, if the WTO talks reach a settlement,
Japanese agriculture will be exposed to fierce competition with
foreign products. The time is running out with bargaining likely to
become fierce prior to the target for reaching an agreement in 2010.
Japan is urged to promptly implement reform of its agricultural
administration in preparation for opening up the market.
3) G-8 and six other participating countries to aim to reach
agreement at WTO talks
SANKEI (Top Play) (Excerpts)
July 10, 2009
Morimichi Imabori, Kazutaka Higa, Rome
The G-8 summit (L'Aquila Summit) held a meeting of the Group of
Eight countries, joined by five emerging countries, such as China
and India, plus Egypt and adopted their first joint statement. Their
aim is to set up a framework for settling international issues that
cannot be dealt with by major countries alone, involving emerging
countries.
TOKYO 00001572 004 OF 012
In the meantime, the G-8 countries on the evening of the 8th prior
to that meeting discussed political issues. Participants condemned
in the strong terms North Korea for its nuclear test and launching
of ballistic missiles and adopted a statement noting that they urge
the international community to implement UNSC Resolution 1874 in a
complete and transparent manner. Concerning non-proliferation, the
statement welcomed the nuclear arms reduction agreement reached at
the U.S.-Russia summit on the 6th, noting that they will pledge to
create a world without nuclear arms.
Concerning the North Korea issue, Prime Minister Taro Aso said that
since the North has conducted nuclear and missile tests in defiance
of the international community, the international community should
adopt a resolute stance in dealing with that nation. Many other
participants supported Aso, saying that the North Korea issue is not
the issue concerning Asia alone.
The prime minister also brought up the abduction issue. The
statement incorporated the wording noting that the G-8 urges North
Korea to immediately address concern felt by the international
community over humanitarian issue. The G-8 economic ministers'
statement has also been adopted. It incorporated a proposal for
setting up a working group to confirm the situation of the progress
on development assistance, which the G-8 has pledged.
4) No new proposals on Northern Territories from Medvedev at
Japan-Russia summit
ASAHI (Page 1) (Abridged)
July 10, 2009
Atsuko Tannai, Rome
Prime Minister Taro Aso met Russian President Dmitriy Medvedev in
L'Aquila on the morning of July 9 (afternoon of July 9, Japan time).
Medvedev said, "We continue to be willing to consider all possible
options under a unique approach," in referring to the key question
of the Northern Territories, but did not present any new proposals
to break the stalemate.
Although Aso complained, "Without willingness to make progress in
the territorial issue on the Russian side, it will not be possible
to build a partnership," he also pointed out, "It is necessary to
work simultaneously on both matters of interest (territorial issue
and economic cooperation)." The two leaders agreed on instructing
working level officials to step up negotiations and on the need to
continue summit level discussions, including telephone
conversations.
They also agreed on the early launching of a trilateral experts'
panel among Japan, the U.S., and Russia to discuss security issues
in Asia and the Pacific.
5) North Korea began developing missiles in 1975, using convertible
materials from Japan
SANKEI (Page 23) (Abridged slightly)
July 10, 2009
In connection with a Tokyo-based North Korea-connected trading
company's attempted plan to illegally export missile-development
materials, it became clear yesterday through interviews with police
TOKYO 00001572 005 OF 012
authorities that magnetic measuring instruments have been carried
into North Korea on several occasions since 1975, under a plan of
exporting such to Burma (Myanmar). Japanese-made magnetic measuring
instruments are highly precise. Police authorities are paying close
attention to the fact that North Korea started developing basic
missile technology as early as 1975. They strongly believe that the
attempted illegal export plan this time around shows North Korea's
plan to provide its missile technology, a product of its many years
of R&D, to Burma.
The equipments carried into North Korea since 1975 were devices to
measure the magnetism of metal materials and the like. They are
widely used in such fields as manufacturing industrial machinery and
basic industrial technology. Materials are indispensable for R&D of
military technologies, such as missiles, and weapons of mass
destruction (WMD). They can reportedly be used for nuclear
development as well.
Those devices were of models older than that of the one the company
tried to export to Burma this time around, but an Economy, Trade and
Industry Ministry source said, "Basically, there is no big
difference in principles, and the precision of Japanese products has
been at the world's top level since around 1975."
The attempted illegal export to Burma occurred based on an order
from the Second Economic Committee, a secret military procurement
organ in North Korea, to Tokyo-based Toko Boeki President Lee Kyoung
Ho, 41, to procure a magnetic measuring device that came via New
East International Trading Co. in Beijing. It has become clear
through investigations that Lee had placed an order to a Japanese
maker and a trading firm and attempted to export the device to
Burma's Industry 2 Ministry via Malaysia.
It has become clear from the materials confiscated from Lee's home
and other related places that materials similar to the one found
this time were exported to North Korea on several occasions in
around 1975.
Investigative authorities believe that North Korea began developing
missiles and WMD on a full scale around that time and continued its
research to establish high technology.
6) Japan, U.S. to hold working-level consultations this month on
foreign, defense policy issues
NIKKEI (Page 1) (Full)
July 10, 2001
Sachiko Deshimaru, Washington
The Japanese and U.S. governments have now entered final
coordination to hold working-level consultations in Japan in
mid-July within the framework of the Security Consultative Committee
of foreign and defense ministers from Japan and the United States
(two-plus-two). The two governments will hold wide-ranging
discussions, focusing mainly on their security policies in East Asia
in response to the situation in North Korea.
The working-level consultations are expected to be held with the
participation of Assistant Secretary of State for East Asian and
Pacific Affairs Campbell and Assistant Secretary of Defense for
Asian and Pacific Security Affairs Gregson from the U.S. government
TOKYO 00001572 006 OF 012
and the Foreign Ministry's North American Affairs Bureau Director
General Kazuyoshi Umemoto and the Defense Ministry's Defense Policy
Bureau Director General Nobushige Takamizawa from the Japanese
government. This is the first time for Japan and the United States
to hold a meeting of their senior officials for foreign affairs and
defense to discuss security issues since the Obama administration
came into office.
The agenda for discussion includes bilateral issues pending between
Japan and the United States, such as selecting Japan's follow-on
mainstay fighter (FX) and relocating the U.S. military's Futenma
airfield. The two governments are going to to take up their regional
security strategies, such as missile defense (MD) shielding. They
are also expected to exchange views about the U.S. military's
deterrence in East Asia.
The two-plus-two working-level consultations will be held at a
sensitive time when the House of Representatives could be dissolved
for a general election. The political situation in Japan is now
becoming murky. As it stands, the two governments are apparently
aiming to push for better communication at the working level. When
the Bush administration was in office, the Japanese and U.S.
governments were closely in touch with each other and occasionally
held two-plus-two ministerial meetings and working-level
consultations. Under the Obama administration as well, the two
countries are going to revamp bilateral cooperation.
The Obama administration is upholding nuclear disarmament. The U.S.
government is expected to explain its policy, anticipating U.S.
allies' concerns about the U.S. military's weakening nuclear
umbrella.
Meanwhile, Japan, the United States, and South Korea will hold
working-level consultations in Tokyo about the middle of this month
with their defense officials attending.
7) Ex-senior government officials: Senior MOFA official ordered
destruction of secret accord-related documents before Information
Disclosure Law implementation in 2001
ASAHI (Top play) (Slightly abridged)
July 10, 2009
It has been learned that in 2001, a senior Ministry of Foreign
Affairs (MOFA) official ordered the destruction of documents in the
ministry relating to a "secret nuclear agreement" concluded between
Japan and the U.S. at the time of the revision of the bilateral
Security Treaty in 1960. Under the agreement, Japan would allow U.S.
vessels carrying nuclear weapons to call on Japanese ports and pass
through its territorial waters. A number of former senior government
and MOFA officials made the above testimony on condition of
anonymity.
It is believed that this was a step taken for fear of "documents
that supposedly do not exist" being discovered when the archiving of
documents in MOFA was reviewed before the implementation of the
Information Disclosure Law in April 2001.
The existence of the secret nuclear agreement has already been
confirmed by official documents published on the U.S. side, but the
Japanese government has consistently denied it. Ryohei Murata, who
was administrative vice foreign minister during the late 1980s, told
TOKYO 00001572 007 OF 012
Asahi Shimbun that, "My predecessor gave me a one-page document
during the handover process, and I briefed the foreign minister at
that time."
The former senior government officials who made the latest testimony
admitted the existence of the secret agreement and said that
documents for vice ministers in the handover process were included
in the destroyed files. The practice of briefing the foreign
minister is believed to have been discontinued when House of
Representatives member Makiko Tanaka became the foreign minister in
¶2001.
One former government official explained that the decision to
destroy the documents was made because "they were documents from a
long time ago, and it was meaningless to faithfully preserve
documents that did not exist officially." Another former government
official said that: "It is believed that the relevant documents were
kept at the North American Affairs Bureau and the Treaty Bureau (now
the International Legal Affairs Bureau). I heard that they were all
destroyed right before the implementation of the Information
Disclosure Law." It is highly possible that guidelines on how the
Japanese government should handle former Ambassador to Japan Edwin
Reischauer's testimony in 1981 on the existence of the secret accord
and other historical documents that only the Japanese side possessed
were destroyed. However, neither of the former officials witnessed
the actual burning or shredding of the documents. One of them
pointed out that "the possibility remains that these documents might
have been preserved as top secret files."
One former administrative vice foreign minister stopped short of
confirming the existence of the secret agreement but said that:
"Right now, documents referring to the secret agreement do not
exist. We cannot release documents that do not exist." It is
believed that this line of reasoning is meant to be an explanation
for the failure to find any relevant documents in case the
Democratic Party of Japan, which is calling for disclosing the
secret agreement, takes over the administration.
Deprived of opportunity to investigate hidden truth
Explanatory note: It is now very likely that documents related to
the "secret nuclear agreement" in MOFA have been destroyed quietly.
This is a dual crime, in the sense that the people have been
continuously deceived about the secret accord and that present and
future Japanese citizens have been deprived of a means to
investigate this matter. A MOFA source also voices the criticism
that, "If that is indeed the case, this is an act of historical
betrayal." (former senior MOFA official)
The "secret nuclear agreement" reached during the Security Treaty
revision in 1960 provided a loophole to the three non-nuclear
principles of "not producing, possessing, and introducing" nuclear
weapons. After the end of the Cold War, the Bush administration in
the early 1990s removed all nuclear arms carried on U.S. naval
vessels, except those on strategic nuclear submarines. An incumbent
senior MOFA official says that, "Since U.S. vessels no longer carry
any nuclear weapons, the so-called secret agreement has already lost
its meaning."
However, with the rise of China and the development of nuclear arms
by North Korea and Iran, it is possible that the U.S. may resume
carrying nuclear arms on ships. In such a case, will the "secret
TOKYO 00001572 008 OF 012
nuclear agreement" be revived? A senior MOFA official says that,
"Since past prime ministers and foreign ministers have stated
repeatedly that the secret agreement did not exist, Japan will
probably have to reach a new agreement with the U.S." However, a
former MOFA official points out: "When it becomes necessary, the
United States will not hesitate to bring in nuclear weapons. Japan,
which is protected by the nuclear umbrella, does not have the option
of saying 'no,' regardless of whether there is a secret agreement or
not."
No matter what security policy Japan intends to adopt, it is
indispensable for the existence of the secret agreement to be
clarified and for the role it has played over the years to be
examined.
8) Iraqi oil minister in talks with METI minister indicates Japan
has the upper hand
SANKEI (Page 9) (Full)
July 10, 2009
Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Toshihiro Nikai on July 9 met
with visiting Iraqi Oil Minister Husayn al-Shahristani in Tokyo. He
conveyed Japan's strong desire to obtain the rights to develop Iraqi
oil fields, saying, "There are projects in which Japanese companies
hope to take part, including the Nasiriyah oil field development
(which the Iraqi government will release to foreign companies). The
government would like to extend overall assistance for those
projects." An Italian firm is also hoping to take part in the
development of the Nasiriyah oil field. The oil minister indicated
that Japan has the lead in the competition, replying, "We expect
participation by Japanese companies." A consortium consisting of
Nippon Oil Corporation (ENEOS), Inpex Corporation and JGC
Corporation is competing with Italy's Ente Nazionale Idrocarburi for
the rights to develop the Nasiriyah oil field in southern Iraq. The
oil minister told reporters that developer of the oil fields will be
decided shortly.
9) Pre-election poll: 40 PERCENT to vote for DPJ, 26 PERCENT for
LDP
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Abridged)
July 10, 2009
Ahead of the forthcoming election for the House of Representatives,
the Nihon Keizai Shimbun conducted a public opinion survey on July
7-9 to probe public awareness. In the survey, respondents were asked
which political party they would like to vote for in their
proportional representation blocs. In response to this question, 40
PERCENT opted for the leading opposition Democratic Party of Japan
(Minshuto), with 26 PERCENT choosing the ruling Liberal Democratic
Party. A total of more than 90 PERCENT answered that they would go
to the polls to cast their votes, broken down into 65 PERCENT
saying they would surely go to the polls and 28 PERCENT saying they
would go to the polls if possible.
Among other parties, the New Komeito was at 7 PERCENT for
proportional representation, with the Japanese Communist Party at 4
PERCENT and the Social Democratic Party at 3 PERCENT .
Respondents were also asked which political party's candidate they
would vote for in their single-seat constituencies. To this
TOKYO 00001572 009 OF 012
question, 39 PERCENT chose the DPJ, with the LDP at 27 PERCENT ,
showing the same trend as in the case of proportional
representation.
The approval rating for the Aso cabinet was 18 PERCENT . The
disapproval rating was 65 PERCENT . In the breakdown of public
support for political parties, the LDP stood at 30 PERCENT , with
the DPJ at 37 PERCENT . "None" or floating voters with no particular
party affiliation accounted for 13 PERCENT .
10) Poll: 39 PERCENT see Aso as LDP's face for election, 44 PERCENT
see another; 41 PERCENT favor DPJ versus LDP's 23 PERCENT in
voting for single-seat candidates
YOMIURI (Page 1) (Abridged)
July 10, 2009
Ahead of the forthcoming election for the House of Representatives,
the Yomiuri Shimbun conducted a telephone-based ad hoc nationwide
public opinion survey on July 7-9. In the survey, 39 PERCENT
answered "yes" when asked if they thought it would be better for the
ruling Liberal Democratic Party to go into the election with Prime
Minister Aso, with 44 PERCENT saying it would be better to replace
him with another person. Respondents were also asked which political
party they would vote for in their single-seat constituencies. To
this question, 41 PERCENT opted for the leading opposition
Democratic Party of Japan (Minshuto), with 23 PERCENT choosing the
LDP. In the popularity ranking of political parties for proportional
representation as well, the DPJ was above the LDP, respectively
standing at 41 PERCENT and 24 PERCENT .
Respondents were further asked who they thought would be appropriate
for prime minister, when comparing Aso and DPJ President Hatoyama.
To this question, 46 PERCENT chose Hatoyama, with 21 PERCENT
picking Aso.
The support rate for the Aso cabinet was 20.2 PERCENT . The
nonsupport rate was 69.3 PERCENT . In the breakdown of public
support for political parties, the DPJ stood at 28.7 PERCENT , with
the LDP at 23.8 PERCENT .
11) Ruling coalition favors Lower House election in late August or
later
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Top play) (Excerpts)
July 10, 2009
Chances are growing that the next House of Representatives election
will be held at the end of August or later. The Liberal Democratic
Party (LDP) is likely to face an uphill battle in the July 12 Tokyo
Metropolitan Assembly election, following its defeat in the July 5
Shizuoka gubernatorial election. With the situation of the Aso
administration and the LDP becoming increasingly severe, the view is
gaining ground in the LDP and its coalition partner, New Komeito,
that an early Lower House dissolution for a snap election is
unadvisable. If the election were to be held in late August or
later, the chances are that the Lower House will be dissolved around
the end of the current Diet session on July 28 for the election on
Aug. 30 or Sept. 6
If the dissolution were to be held off until the end of the current
Diet session, the drive to unseat Aso in the LDP might gain
TOKYO 00001572 010 OF 012
momentum. For this reason, Prime Minister Taro Aso has searched for
ways to dissolve the chamber immediately after the Tokyo poll for an
election in early August. But this plan is drawing fierce
objections, based on the opinion that given the expected uphill
battle in the Tokyo poll combined with the cabinet's dwindling
support ratings, an early election will bring a humiliating defeat
to the LDP.
Yesterday afternoon, such LDP veteran lawmakers as former Secretary
General Koichi Kato, former Foreign Minister Masahiko Komura, and
former Senior Deputy General Council Chairman Hajime Funada, held
talks near the Diet building and agreed to oppose an early
dissolution.
The secretaries general of LDP actions also met last night. The
prevalent view at the meeting was that top priority should be given
to the enactment of key bills and DPJ President Hatoyama's donation
scandal.
Furthermore, former Prime Minister Yoshiro Mori, who has a strong
influence on the management of the Aso administration, has recently
opposed an Aug. 2 election. Mori is showing a cautious stance about
the Aso side's dissolution timetable.
12) DPJ's real motivation is to keep Aso in prime minister's post
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
July 10, 2009
The main opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has decided to
submit next week to the House of Representatives a no-confidence
motion against the cabinet of Prime Minister Taro Aso. The DPJ,
which has reportedly taken the lead in campaigning for the Tokyo
Metropolitan Assembly election on July 12, intends to force Aso to
dissolve the Lower House for a general election.
Asked by reporters about submitting the no-confidence motion, DPJ
President Yukio Hatoyama said yesterday at party headquarters:
"Through the Tokyo assembly election, we will be able to see how
strong public criticism of the Aso administration is. After seeing
the results of the election, we will consider (submitting a
no-confidence motion) early next week," revealing that the DPJ is
considering submitting a no-confidence motion after the Tokyo race.
The DPJ is aiming for a speedy dissolution of the Lower House. A
defeat of the ruling parties in the Tokyo election would mean that
the public indicates "No" to the Aso administration. This would be
the optimal timing for the DPJ to submit a no-confidence motion and
urge Aso to dissolve the Lower House.
However, if the ruling coalition loses the Tokyo race, moves to oust
Aso as prime minister will definitely strengthen in the Liberal
Democratic Party (LDP).
The DPJ's real motivation is to fight in the Lower House election
with the LDP led by Aso, who has been suffering low support rates.
Deputy President Naoto Kan said yesterday: "The public will not
allow another replacement of a prime minister. If that happens, the
DPJ might be forced (to allow Aso to) dissolve the Lower House."
Therefore, submission of the motion of no confidence is intended to
prevent the moves of anti-Aso forces. The DPJ's ideal is that
TOKYO 00001572 011 OF 012
submission of the motion will lead to dissolution, prompting many
rebels to emerge in the LDP. However, even if the motion is voted
down, it will mean that the ruling parties give their vote of
confidence. The DPJ, therefore, hopes that submission of the motion
will produce the effect of preventing the moves of anti-Aso forces.
However, the DPJ is concerned that it will come under criticism from
the ruling party if the Diet fails to pass an organ transplant law
amendment bill and special measures legislation on cargo inspections
on ships going in and out of North Korea due to suspension of
deliberations caused by submission of the motion of no confidence.
Hatoyama, referring to the organ transplantation law amendment,
asserted: "It is necessary to enact the bills that should be passed
in the current regular Diet session."
13) Prime Minister Aso gives order not to include his photo on the
cover of LDP's manifesto
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full)
July 10, 2009
It has been learned that Prime Minister Taro Aso (president of the
Liberal Democratic Party) ordered the LDP project team (PT) in
charge of drafting a manifest (set of campaign pledges for the next
House of Representatives election) not to include his photograph on
the cover of the manifest.
LDP General Council Deputy Chairman Hajime Funada, a PT member, told
reporters yesterday: "The Prime Minister wants young people to be
able to read (our manifesto) on the train without hesistation. So
the manifesto will not have Prime Minister's photograph on the
cover."
The LDP's manifesto for the 2005 Lower House election had a large
portrait of then Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi with the slogan,
"Postal privatization is our key reform goal," on the cover. The
fact that Prime Minster Aso's photograph will not being included
will likely raise speculations that the ruling camp will lose the
Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly election and Aso will resign as prime
minister before the Lower House general election.
14) Ruling parties to turn heat on DPJ at Lower House committee
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full)
July 10, 2009
The House of Representatives Special Committee on Political Ethics
Establishment and Revision of the Public Offices Election Law held a
meeting to discuss a bill amending the Political Fund Control Law,
which was submitted by the main opposition Democratic Party of Japan
(DPJ). The ruling parties, which are searching for clues on turning
the tables for the next Lower House election, pursued DPJ President
Yukio Hatoyama's false political funding report issue.
LDP Election Strategy Council Deputy Chairman Yoshihide Suga pointed
out that the Internal Affairs and Communications Ministry issued
documents necessary for tax exemptions for political donations by
75 persons (totaling 11,862,000 yen), which Hatoyama's political
fund management organization corrected in its reports on political
funds for fiscal 2005, 2006, and 2007. The ministry admitted it.
Base on this, Suga repeatedly pursed the Hatoyama issue, saying: "Is
TOKYO 00001572 012 OF 012
it a fraud if the donations are used for tax returns?" Hatoyama last
evening stressed to reporters at party headquarters: "I believe
firmly that there was no tax evasion. I have absolutely no idea."
The ruling camp intends to demand Hatoyama's fund management
organization to submit accounting records at a committee meeting on
July 10 based on the Diet Testimony Law. The DPJ, in protest of the
holding of committee sessions, is expected to be absent from a
meeting today.
ZUMWALT