VZCZCXRO4312
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1502/01 1822154
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 012154Z JUL 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4238
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 7314
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4983
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8786
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 2517
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5506
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0206
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 6236
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 5928

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 14 TOKYO 001502 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 07/01/09 
 
INDEX: 
(1) Prime Minister Aso's Central Asia assistance initiative would 
expand "arc of freedom and prosperity" concept (Sankei) 
 
(2) Election for voters to choose whether it will be the LDP or the 
DPJ: LDP focuses on sales tax hike, while DPJ on eliminating 
wasteful projects (Asahi) 
 
(3) DPJ drafts policy manifesto for Lower House election (Nikkei) 
 
(4) Lower House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Kono may investigate 
secret deal on bringing in nuclear weapons (Mainichi) 
 
(5) Lower House Foreign Affairs Committee chair to question former 
vice minister on secret nuclear deal (Asahi) 
 
(6) Foreign minister, UN secretary general: North Korea's possession 
of nuclear weapons unacceptable (Sankei) 
 
(7) Antipiracy mission and refueling mission must be linked together 
(Yomiuri) 
 
(8) U.S. Navy's JGPO chief: Guam relocation construction work to 
start in fall 2010 (Ryukyu Shimpo) 
 
(9) GSDF deployment in Yonaguni mulled; Defense minister positive 
about town's request (Ryukyu Shimpo) 
 
(10) All CH-53s to be relocated from Futenma to Guam: U.S. military 
(Okinawa Times) 
 
(11)Futenma base should be closed (Okinawa Times) 
 
(12) Interview with Hitoshi Tanaka, senior fellow at Japan Center 
for International Exchange, on G-8 Summit: Japan should work for 
diversified cooperation (Mainichi) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Prime Minister Aso's Central Asia assistance initiative would 
expand "arc of freedom and prosperity" concept 
 
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Prime Minister Taro Aso delivered a speech on foreign policy at a 
seminar yesterday hosted by the Japan Institute for international 
Affairs, headed by Yoshiji Nogami. Aso revealed a Eurasia Crossroad 
initiative aimed to build two traffic routes - one running from east 
to west and the other from north to south -- in the Eurasia 
continent, centering on the Caucasus region. With regard to the 
North Korea issue, Aso stated that Japan will prepare for financial 
sanctions cargo inspections with an eye on the implementation of a 
UN Security Council resolution condemning the North's nuclear test. 
He intends to announce the plan at the G-8 summit, which will take 
place on July 8-10 in L` Aquila, Italy. 
 
It is believed that the Ark of Freedom and Prosperity initiative, 
which Aso revealed in 2006 when he was foreign minister, was aimed 
to seek to constrain China and Russia by supporting and cooperating 
with newly developing countries around the Eurasia continent that 
share such values as democracy and market economy. 
 
TOKYO 00001502  002 OF 014 
 
 
 
Aso's new initiative is targeted at the region surrounded by the Ark 
of Freedom and Prosperity. Central Asia and the Caucasus are regions 
with an abundance of petroleum and natural gas. Aso emphasized: "If 
stability and prosperity generate a synergistic effect in this 
region, the global economy will be greatly propelled forward." At 
the same time, he advocated the "modern version of Silk Road" 
initiative to improve the circulation of people, products and money 
from the Pacific to Europe. He called for participation of China, 
India, and Russia in the initiative. 
 
Aso stated on the North Korea issue: "It is necessary to apply 
strong pressure on North Korea by closely cooperating with the 
United States, South Korea, China, and Russia. He then said that the 
Japanese government would cooperate with the Six-Party Talks 
members, excluding North Korea, to boost the effectiveness of the 
UNSC resolution. 
 
(2) Election for voters to choose whether it will be the LDP or the 
DPJ: LDP focuses on sales tax hike, while DPJ on eliminating 
wasteful projects 
 
ASAHI (Page 3) (Excerpts) 
June 30, 2009 
 
The government has enacted a bold and generous extra budget totaling 
more than 15 trillion yen in stimulus measures. A proposal for 
building a hall to display anime cartoons at a cost of 11.7 billion 
yen incorporated in the budget has given rise to a call from within 
the LDP for suspending the budget. 
 
Lower House member Taro Kono, who served as a chief examiner of 
budgets submitted by 11 ministries and agencies, including the 
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport, Science and Technology 
(MEXT), at a meeting of the party's project team to root out 
wasteful expenditures directly opposed the plan, saying: "This is 
the most unreasonable project. This could call the credibility of 
the budget as a whole into question. 
 
However, the issue raised by Kono has not spread across the party. 
Policy Research Council Chairman Kosuke Hori warned, "The budget was 
enacted after securing party approval. It is, therefore, 
unreasonable for the party to complain about it." Kono pointed out 
another problem last year, but a member of a certain Diet policy 
clique yelled at him, "Are you teaming up with the Japan Teachers' 
Union (affiliated with the opposition camp)?" Kono impatiently said: 
"Diet policy clique members do not look into the specifics of the 
budget. If they review the budget of all government agencies, they 
could realize that 4 trillion yen has been appropriated for wasteful 
expenditures." 
 
State finances are heavily in the red. Debts held by the central and 
local governments have snowballed to 800 trillion yen due to the 
declining birthrate, the aging society and increasing 
social-security expenses. 
 
Under such a circumstance, the LDP's stance is to designate funding 
resources for social security and other spending items by hiking the 
sales tax. Kono's team was launched a year ago with the aim of 
indicating the party's stance of tackling a reduction in wasteful 
expenditures before discussing a hike in the sales tax. 
 
 
TOKYO 00001502  003 OF 014 
 
 
The Cabinet Office presented during Diet debate on the 2009 basic 
fiscal policy guidelines, adopted at a cabinet meeting on the 23rd 
an estimate that the sales tax of 12 PERCENT  is necessary to 
recapitalize the nation's fiscal base. In the LDP presidential 
election last year, Aso said that the 10 PERCENT  level would be one 
yardstick for a future sales tax rate. Finance Minister Yosano said, 
"The sales tax will be hiked to the 10 PERCENT  level by 2015." This 
is the overall view of the LDP regarding a future sales tax ratio. 
 
The LDP is thus characterizing a hike in the sales tax, which can be 
collected broadly and thinly, as the most feasible means of 
stabilizing the state finances, although some are opposing the idea. 
If the LDP is to go into the election under the present structure, 
it will launch efforts to materialize the envisaged tax hike, once 
it wins the election. However, with the election close at hand, 
discussion of the tax hike is losing steam. The mid-term program, 
which the government and the ruling parties compiled late last year, 
mentions that the timetable for hiking the sale tax is fiscal 2011. 
However, the precondition for that is the economy is on a recovery 
track. The additional clause to a law related to the amendment to 
the tax code stepped back from the mid-term program. It notes that 
legal measures needed for a hike are to be taken by fiscal 2011. The 
2009 basic fiscal policy line did not even include any descriptions 
on the sales tax. 
 
The DPJ's manifesto notes that the sales tax rate will be left 
unchanged. However, the party has a future increase in the rate in 
mind. 
 
Regarding reform of the pension system, the showcase of the 
manifesto, the DPJ's plan is to set up a minimum security pension 
system wholly financed by sales tax revenues. A hike would therefore 
be unavoidable, if a totally new pension system is adopted. 
 
However, its basic strategy is to bring up a sale tax hike in the 
general election after next. How is it going to secure funding 
resources for showcase policy proposals, such as toll-free highways 
and child allowance? 
 
On June 23, Deputy Secretary General Akira Nagatsuma and members of 
the DPJ Land and Traffic Division Council were asking officials in 
charge at the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport 
questions in an effort to identify waste in four projects, such as 
the construction of a joint government building that is to house 
local branches of the central government. 
 
The government's Decentralization Reform Promotion Committee had 
recommended the consolidation or reorganization of those branch 
offices, and yet, a budget for the construction of a joint 
government building at the cost of 22.5 billion yen was compiled to 
be implemented in fiscal 2009 to finance earthquake-resistant works. 
With committee members unanimously determining that it is a rush-in 
budget compiled for the sake of using up budgetary funds, the 
committee decided that the project should be killed. 
 
Scrapping unnecessary projects saves fiscal resources. The DPJ 
started efforts to identify such projects with focus on 3,000 
projects held by all government agencies in March. The results of 
the survey were compiled into 12 book forms 10 centimeters thick. 
Various division councils are now scrutinizing them. The DPJ intends 
to use this "gold mine" to scrap wasteful projects, if it takes over 
the reins of government. 
 
TOKYO 00001502  004 OF 014 
 
 
 
Hatoyama estimated that if the DPJ accumulates such an effort, it 
might be able to eke out about 10 trillion yen from the annual 
budget worth over 200 trillion yen, including special accounts. 
 
However, since there are few lawmakers who know about the matter, 
even council meetings are often no more than a simple hearing of 
circumstances. The 10 trillion yen has no substantial foundation, 
either. 
Hatoyama during the party head talks on June 17 said, "If we seize 
power, we will basically scrap large public works that are out of 
place in the modern age. Unnecessary and non-urgent projects can 
wait." It means that projects with low priority will go first, even 
if they are directly connected with the lives of local residents, 
such as major construction works or the building of roads.'' 
 
(3) DPJ drafts policy manifesto for Lower House election 
 
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Slightly abridged) 
July 1, 2009 
 
The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has compiled and released an 
outline of its policy manifesto for the upcoming House of 
Representatives election. The DPJ draft campaign pledges call for 
implementing such assistant measures for households as waiving 
express tolls and creating child-care allowances starting in April 
¶2010. The document states that approximately 17 trillion yen would 
be needed to finance these measures. The DPJ underscores a clear-cut 
difference in its pension and other policies from the ruling camp. 
But on diplomatic and security policies, the party faces the 
difficult challenge of building a favorable relationship with the 
U.S. 
 
Party sidesteps consumption tax hike; unifying pension systems 
possibly in fiscal 2014 
 
13,000 yen as allowance for child support 
 
President Yukio Hatoyama and other DPJ executives yesterday approved 
in general a manifesto drafted by the party's manifesto preparation 
committee, chaired by Policy Research Council Chairman Masayuki 
Naoshima. The draft specifies a roadmap for implementing its 
campaign pledges and measures to secure the necessary financial 
resources to that end. 
 
The roadmap lists assistance measures intended for households, 
setting fiscal 2010 as its initial year. Included among such 
measures are abolishing all provisional gasoline and other tax rates 
in fiscal 2010 and public high school tuition fees. It also proposes 
providing 13,000 yen as a monthly allowance for child support in 
fiscal 2010 and 2011 and doubling the amount starting in fiscal 
¶2012. 
 
Under the roadmap, in fiscal 2011 the party would expand the 
toll-waiving measure and rectify the shortage of doctors by taking 
such measures as increasing the fixed number of medical school 
students. The party intends to introduce an income subsidy system 
for farmers in fiscal 2012. 
 
To make these public pledges more credible, it is necessary to 
specify where the necessary revenues will come from. The party 
expects 7 trillion and approximately 17 trillion yen to be needed in 
 
TOKYO 00001502  005 OF 014 
 
 
fiscal 2011 and in fiscal 2013, respectively, to finance the 
proposed important new measures. Of the 17 trillion yen, the party 
intends to squeeze out about 9 trillion yen by slashing waste 
spending and to disburse 8 trillion yen from reserve funds, such as 
reserves in the Special Account for Public Investment and Loans, as 
well as from revenues to be accrued by selling government assets and 
by tax hikes. 
 
Minimum pension of 70,000 yen to be guaranteed 
 
The DPJ also places emphasis on social security issues. Over the 
pension record-keeping fiasco and a series of scandals involving the 
Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, criticism of the government 
and the ruling parties is growing. The party is willing to put up 
pension reform as the top issue in the upcoming election, as it did 
in the 2007 House of Councillors election. 
 
Under its pension reform plan, the party would consolidate the 
pension systems and create a pension program designed to guarantee 
minimum pension of 70,000 yen with revenues from the consumption tax 
as its financial resource. The party set the goal of introducing the 
new system in fiscal 2014, based on the judgment it will take time 
for the switchover process. 
 
In pension reform, no additional expenses will be accrued over the 
next four years, but it will become inevitably necessary to raise 
the consumption tax in the future. Naoshima said in a speech he 
delivered yesterday: "The party will start discussing a tax hike and 
raise the tax rate sometime in the future." 
 
Plan to integrate local governments into 300 withdrawn 
 
In decentralization efforts, the party dropped former president 
Ichiro Ozawa's proposal for integrating local governments into 300, 
reflecting strong reactions from local governments, with one 
representative claiming, "That will turn to be forcible annexation." 
The DPJ also intends to approve the government's plan of integrating 
the nation's 47 prefectures into several administrative regions 
within the scope of the measure not developing into national 
compulsion. 
 
The DPJ intends to maintain its current policy of changing the tied 
subsidy system into a package subsidy system to enable local 
governments to decide on how to use the subsidies. 
 
Reforming the bureaucracy is also a key element in the DPJ's 
manifesto. The party plans to cut wasteful spending of tax money by 
abolishing the amakudari practice of securing postretirement jobs 
for retired bureaucrats and examining the expenditures of public 
corporations. In an effort to establish a mechanism to enable 
politicians to take the lead in policymaking, the DPJ proposes 
increasing the numbers of senior vice ministers and parliamentary 
secretaries, as well as having more than 100 ruling party members 
join in the government. But some members suggest that if the 
government stands adamantly against the bureaucracy, the government 
will find it difficult to carry out necessary policies. Naoshima 
commented: "We are not thinking of dismissing bureaucrats at all." 
 
Fissure might occur over U.S. policy 
 
Over foreign and security policies, views are widely split in the 
DPJ. The party's package of policies, which bases its manifesto, 
 
TOKYO 00001502  006 OF 014 
 
 
puts forth "equal Japan-U.S. relations," but the manifesto revealed 
the party's stance of placing emphasis on Asia by advocating 
Hatoyama's stock argument for creating an East Asia community. 
 
On Japan-U.S. relations, the draft manifesto says that the party 
will initiate work to drastically reform the Japan-U.S. Status of 
Forces Agreement. With respect to the planned realignment of U.S. 
forces in Japan, the document notes that it will constantly examine 
U.S. military-related budgetary allocations, such as the bill for 
transferring U.S. Marines in Okinawa to Guam. These expressions are 
expected to incur a strong reaction from the U.S. The focus of 
attention is likely to be on how the DPJ will steer the Japan-U.S. 
alliance. 
 
Regarding Asia policy, the draft manifesto stresses a commitment to 
promoting the Chiang Mai initiative, a framework to offer foreign 
currency loans to countries suffering from a shortage of foreign 
currencies in the region. 
 
If the DPJ aims to establish a coalition government after the Lower 
House election, the issue of whether Japan should send Self-Defense 
Force (SDF) troops overseas is expected to become a source of 
trouble, because the Social Democratic Party (SDP) is strongly 
opposed to that policy. The party in its package of policies 
approves SDF troops' antipiracy operations and Afghan reconstruction 
assistance, although attaching conditions. In drawing up common 
policies with other opposition parties, including the SDP, this 
issue is likely to be a contentious point. 
 
Speak of pain on public, show vision for future of Japan 
 
Analysis by Nikkei editorial committee member Kiyoyuki Uchiyama 
 
The Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has accelerated work to lay out 
its manifesto. We welcome it. We also welcome the fact that the 
party has revealed necessary financial resources and placed the 
order of priorities on each policy measure. 
 
We wonder, however, only reserves and saved money by slashing waste 
spending will be enough to finance such eye-catching measures as 
abolishing provisional tax rates. 
 
What worries us more is the DPJ's stance of not speaking of the pain 
expected to be brought on the people. The party includes the 
revenues expected to be raised by reviewing the marital deduction, a 
tax hike in effect, but the party has given no satisfactory 
explanation about it. The party has not actively discussed 
deregulatory measures, imperative for Japan to survive the age of 
globalization and the age of declining birthrate and aging 
population. Meanwhile, Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) members have 
devoted themselves to discussing whether the Lower House should be 
dissolved under Prime Minister Taro Aso, although only two months or 
so are left until the Lower House members' term of office expires. 
The LDP's policies are also more ambiguous than the DPJ's. The party 
is still split over postal privatization and structural reform. 
Their manifestos are to represent the picture of Japan's future. A 
manifesto for the upcoming election, in which a change of government 
might take place, has a weighty meaning. 
 
(4) Lower House Foreign Affairs Committee chair Kono may investigate 
secret deal on bringing in nuclear weapons 
 
 
TOKYO 00001502  007 OF 014 
 
 
MAINICHI ONLINE (Full) 
13:40, July 1, 2009 
 
Naoyuki Inukai 
 
Taro Kono, chairman of the House of Representatives Committee on 
Foreign Affairs, held a news conference at the Diet on July 1, where 
he commented on the testimony by former Vice Foreign Minister Ryohei 
Murata that the secret agreement on "bringing in nuclear weapons" 
concluded by the Japanese and U.S. governments at the time of the 
revision of the Security Treaty in 1960 "had been passed on from one 
vice foreign minister to the next." He said: "Remarks (admitting the 
existence of the secret deal) have been made by former Ambassador to 
Japan Edwin Reischauer and others, and documents exist on the U.S. 
side. Former vice ministers have testified, while the government 
keeps saying the secret agreement does not exist. Common sense 
indicates there must be something amiss," indicating that his 
committee will look into the facts. 
 
Kono intends to question Murata, other former vice ministers, and 
past foreign ministers, and summon them as unsworn witnesses at the 
current Diet session. 
 
(5) Lower House Foreign Affairs Committee chair to question former 
vice minister on secret nuclear deal 
 
ASAHI ONLINE (Full) 
13:18, July 1, 2009 
 
House of Representatives Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Taro 
Kono held a news conference on July 1 after the committee's meeting 
in connection with the alleged secret agreement made at the time of 
the revision of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty in 1960 that port 
calls by U.S. vessels carrying nuclear arms and their passage 
through Japanese territorial waters would not require prior 
consultations. He said: "The situation is such that we are no longer 
able to conduct Diet business believing in the government's response 
(that the secret agreement does not exist). The legislature cannot 
afford to ignore this matter." He indicated that an opportunity to 
question former Vice Foreign Minister Ryohei Murata, perhaps in the 
capacity of an unsworn witness, will be arranged. 
 
He plans to carry out this plan during the current Diet session, 
saying: "I will do everything possible," and indicating his 
intention to question other former vice foreign ministers or the 
U.S. side. Meanwhile, Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone said at the 
committee's session that the Ministry of Foreign Affairs has no 
plans to reinvestigate this matter: "Previous prime ministers and 
foreign ministers have clearly denied the existence of the secret 
agreement. I have no plans to verify the facts with Mr. Murata once 
again." 
 
(6) Foreign minister, UN secretary general: North Korea's possession 
of nuclear weapons unacceptable 
 
SANKEI (Page 5) (Full) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone met yesterday with United Nations 
Secretary General Ban Ki Moon at the Foreign Ministry's Iikura Guest 
House. They shared the view that the nuclear test North Korea 
forcibly conducted was a challenge to the international community 
 
TOKYO 00001502  008 OF 014 
 
 
and that the North's possession of nuclear weapons was unacceptable. 
They were also in agreement that UN Security Council Resolution 1874 
should be faithfully implemented. 
 
In the meeting, Nakasone stated: 
 
"In order to have North Korea give up on its nuclear and missile 
development programs, we need to secure the effectiveness of UNSC 
Resolution 1874. We want to resolve in cooperation with the UN the 
human rights problem, including the abduction issue." 
 
Ban pointed out: "The UN member countries are obliged to comply with 
any UNSC resolution. North Korea, too, should completely abide by 
them." 
 
(7) Antipiracy mission and refueling mission must be linked 
together 
 
YOMIURI (Page 13) (Excerpts) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Hidemichi Katsumata, senior writer 
 
The Maritime Self-Defense Force (MSDF) is conducting antipiracy and 
refueling activities in the Gulf of Aden off Somalia and the 
adjacent Indian Ocean, respectively. Those two missions must be 
linked together. 
 
On the morning of June 6, the MSDF vessel Tokiwa, now on the 
refueling mission in the Indian Ocean, provided fuel at the eastern 
edge of the Gulf of Aden for the first time to the MSDF destroyers 
Sazanami and Samidare that are on the antipiracy mission (in waters 
of Somalia). 
 
The MSDF supply ship is tasked with providing fuel and water to 
Combined Task Force 150 (CTF-150), a multinational coalition naval 
task force composed of seven countries, including the United States 
and Britain, that are engaged in antiterrorism operations, such as 
interdicting the trafficking of arms and drugs in the Indian Ocean. 
This is the MSDF's eighth year providing fuel to vessels of those 
countries. But a gap in supply and demand has begun coming to light 
in the process of making arrangements with the navies of other 
countries. 
 
During the months of April and May, the MSDF supply vessel provided 
fuel only to eight foreign naval vessels. Conversely, seven planned 
refuels - almost one in two events - were cancelled at the last 
minute, including one by the French Navy on June 5. 
 
The United States and Britain have launched antipiracy forces in an 
effort to stem rampant piracy in waters off Somalia, and the 
European fleets are stepping up their activities as well. (The 
reason of the decline in demand) is because an increasing number of 
CTF-150 vessels are now on the antiterrorism and antipiracy missions 
at the same time. 
 
Capt. Koji Manabe of the supply group command said: "(Their) duties 
are becoming increasingly complex. The United States and European 
countries are operating their naval vessels effectively." 
 
Under the tight restrictions of domestic law, the MSDF appears to be 
less flexible in operating its refueling vessel than other 
 
TOKYO 00001502  009 OF 014 
 
 
countries. 
 
The MSDF refueler is allowed to provide fuel only to CTF-15 vessels 
that are engaged in antiterrorism operations. The MSDF was pursued 
at the Diet (in 2007) over the allegation that Japanese fuel 
provided to a U.S. supply vessel had been diverted to the war in 
Iraq. As such, there is a provision that strictly defines the kinds 
of vessels eligible to receive fuel from the MSDF. The provision 
applies to the MSDF antipiracy unit as well. 
 
The MSDF vessel on the refueling mission had not provided fuel to 
the two MSDF destroyers on the antipiracy mission until June 6 
because there is an order allowing the refueler to provide fuel only 
in the scope that does not hamper refueling to vessels on the 
antiterrorism mission. A senior Defense Ministry official noted: 
"Both antiterrorism and antipiracy activities are being conducted by 
the MSDF, but financial authorities do not like the idea of using 
the fuel purchased for the former for the latter." 
 
At Djibouti port on the western edge of the Gulf of Aden where the 
MSDF destroyers replenish with water and fuel, naval vessels of 
other countries also line up for fuel. In some cases, the MSDF 
destroyers could not receive fuel until minutes before their 
commercial ship escort operation. Drinking water that contains bug 
casings is unfit for drinking. 
 
Capt. Hiroshi Goto, who is leading the antipiracy mission, took this 
view: "We turn seawater into drinking water. If we can receive 
(water and fuel) from the MSDF supply ship, the time spent at 
Djibouti for refueling will be eliminated, thereby expanding our 
policing activities." 
 
It is likely that antipiracy legislation will be enacted and a 
second MSDF antipiracy unit will be dispatched soon as a result. 
Under the new legislation that is designed to allow the escorts of 
vessels regardless of their flag states, MSDF activities are certain 
to increase. Capt. Manabe said, "If the destroyers can receive fuel 
from (the MSDF supply vessel) regularly, that will increase the 
freedom of antipiracy measures." 
 
If the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) takes power, the suspension 
of the refueling mission will become a real possibility. Has 
politics really heeded the voices of MSDF troops at sea? Both the 
antipiracy mission and the refueling mission are international 
cooperation activities. Linking them together is a first step (to 
heeding those voices). 
 
(8) U.S. Navy's JGPO chief: Guam relocation construction work to 
start in fall 2010 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 3) (Full) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Takumi Takimoto, Guam, June 30 
 
In connection with the relocation of the U.S. Marines in Okinawa to 
Guam under the U.S. Forces Japan (USFJ) realignment plans, John 
Jackson, head of the U.S. Navy's Joint Guam Program Office (JGPO), 
indicated on June 30 that a draft environmental assessment plan will 
be drawn up this fall and plans for the construction of the new base 
will be finalized around summer 2010, after considering the opinions 
or local residents. The project will start by fall 2010 as planned, 
 
TOKYO 00001502  010 OF 014 
 
 
and the construction of barracks, which will be partly funded by the 
Japanese government, will start in 2011. 
 
Jackson explained that the Marines' move from Okinawa to Guam will 
include their command headquarters, as well as the heavy-lift CH-53 
helicopter troops currently using Futenma Air Station. 
 
With regard to the construction cost, Captain Scott Galbreaith, 
commander of U.S. Naval Base Guam, explained that new housing units 
for the navy commanders (four bedrooms, 213 square meters) cost 
around 700,000 dollars (approximately 66 million yen) each 
"inclusive of roads, plumbing, electricity, playgrounds, and so 
forth, so it should be similar for the marines." 
 
U.S. Consul General for Okinawa Kevin Maher said that the U.S. and 
Japanese governments agreed on the number of Marines to be relocated 
to Guam not by adding up the number of command headquarters 
personnel and other units to be relocated. They agreed first of all 
to aim at a number that would make a major political impact. 
 
(9) GSDF deployment in Yonaguni mulled; Defense minister positive 
about town's request 
 
RYUKYU SHIMPO (Page 1) (Full) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Tokyo - Mayor Shukichi Hokama of the town of Yonaguni, Speaker 
Sonkichi Sakihara of the town assembly, and other officials had 
separate meetings with Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada and chief of 
staff of the Ground Self-Defense Force (GSDF) Yoshifumi Hibako at 
the Ministry of Defense (MOD) on June 30 to hand over a letter 
requesting the stationing of the GSDF. This is the first time that a 
mayor of Yonaguni has made a request to the defense minister for SDF 
deployment. According to Hokama, Hamada indicated his understanding 
of the request and said: "The fact that I met you today is my answer 
(to your request)," showing that he is positive about deploying SDF 
troops to Yonaguni island. Hibako also indicated his intention to 
work actively toward it: "We will work on this and see if this can 
be included in the Mid-Term Defense Buildup Program or the National 
Defense Program Guidelines." 
 
Hamada stated at the meeting: "Right now, we are in the process of 
studying the ideal level of defense capability and the level of 
defense in the Ryukyu Islands, including Yonaguni. This island 
constitutes the western border of Japan and is important in terms of 
national defense." He added that, "It is encouraging to receive a 
request like this." 
 
At present, the possibility of stationing SDF troops for the defense 
of the Ryukyu Islands is being studied by an experts' panel in the 
government and in the MOD. 
 
After the meetings, Hokama said: "I have a strong feeling that this 
will happen. There are people who are against the stationing of the 
SDF, so we will have to think about how to gain understanding in the 
local community," indicating he will coordinate with the local 
community as he proceeds. 
 
The request letter stresses that the Yonaguni area is often hit by 
typhoons, is in the seismic activities belt, and is potentially at 
risk of large-scale disasters. It also expresses concern about 
"developments in the neighboring countries" in connection with the 
 
TOKYO 00001502  011 OF 014 
 
 
disputed Senkaku islands and resource development in the East China 
Sea, thus emphasizing the need for the SDF. Yonaguni is making the 
request in light of the upgrade of the GSDF's First Combined Brigade 
(Naha) to the 15th Brigade in the current fiscal year. 
 
In September 2008, the town assembly passed by a majority vote a 
resolution on inviting the SDF to be stationed in Yonaguni. A 
petition for SDF deployment signed by 514 citizens of the island 
(with a total population of around 1,600) was also adopted. On the 
other hand, opponents to SDF stationing have also formed groups. The 
islanders are divided on this issue. 
 
(10) All CH-53s to be relocated from Futenma to Guam: U.S. military 
 
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 1) (Abridged) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Shin Yoshida, Guam 
 
The Guam office of the U.S. Department of the Navy's Joint Guam 
Program Office (JGPO) revealed yesterday that the Futenma-based 
squadron of CH-53 heavy lift helicopters would be fully relocated to 
Andersen Air Force Base in Guam in the process of realigning U.S. 
forces in Japan. According to the Okinawa prefectural government, 
the U.S. Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station currently deploys four 
CH-53 choppers. 
 
John Jackson, director of the JGPO's Guam office, explained to 
reporters visiting Guam from Okinawa Prefecture to see 
security-related facilities here: "One squadron normally consists of 
12 helicopters. We have decided on the Futenma squadron's full 
transfer to Guam." 
 
If the Futenma squadron's full transfer is carried out, all 
Futenma-based CH-53 helicopters, one of which crashed on the campus 
of Okinawa International University, will disappear from Okinawa 
Prefecture. However, the Defense Ministry has incorporated the U.S. 
military's CH-53 operation in its environmental impact assessment 
procedures for an alternative facility to be built in a coastal area 
of Camp Schwab in the northern Okinawa coastal city of Nago. 
Accordingly, another CH-53 squadron may be deployed to the Futenma 
replacement facility. 
 
Futenma airfield also deploys two other squadrons consisting of 
about 24 CH-46 midsize helicopters. "They will not be transferred to 
Guam," Jackson said. He also said he had no idea if the Futenma 
replacement facility would deploy CH-46 choppers or V-22 Ospreys. 
 
The Guam visit of reporters from Okinawa was sponsored by the U.S. 
Consulate General in Okinawa, and Consul General Kevin Maher 
accompanied the reporters to Guam. The Marine Corps plans to move 
8,000 troops and their families from Okinawa to Guam. Maher 
explained that the number of family members is a "rough estimate" 
that came out when the Japanese and U.S. governments agreed on the 
U.S. military's realignment. "It's unclear," Maher said, indicating 
that the U.S. military has yet to finalize its estimate of 9,000 
family members incorporated in the roadmap. 
 
(11)Futenma base should be closed 
 
OKINAWA TIMES (Page 5) (Full) 
July 1, 2009 
 
TOKYO 00001502  012 OF 014 
 
 
 
Yoichi Iha, Ginowan mayor 
 
There are now objections being raised from both Japan and the United 
States to the plans to relocate the U.S. Marine Corps' Futenma Air 
Station to Nago City's Henoko district and to transfer U.S. Marines 
from Okinawa to Guam. In Japan, the Democratic Party of Japan 
leadership has clearly said "no" to the relocation of Futenma 
airfield to Henoko. 
 
New DPJ President Yukio Hatoyama has recently said Futenma airfield 
should be relocated outside Okinawa Prefecture. In addition, DPJ 
Secretary General Katsuya Okada has also suggested the need to break 
out of the present situation, implying the option of relocating 
Futenma airfield outside Japan. "We should discuss from scratch 
whether it is normal to host so many U.S. military bases in 
Okinawa," Okada says in a monthly magazine's interview. 
 
In the United States as well, U.S. Marine Corps Commandant Conway 
testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee in a June 4 
hearing that the Marine Corps had some modifications worthy of 
consideration. He is quoted in a report as stating: "One of the 
important decisions for the agreement to realign U.S. forces is to 
transfer about 8,000 Marines from Okinawa to Guam, and this is 
intended to resolve the issue of a Marine Corps base that neighbors 
an area of local residents in Okinawa. We can conduct military 
training on U.S. territory with allies and we can meet various 
emergencies in Asia. Ensuring training areas and ranges on Guam and 
the Northern Mariana Islands is a prerequisite for moving Marine 
forces to Guam. This relocation to Guam, if executed properly, will 
result in Marine forces that are combat ready and forward postured, 
contributing to U.S. interests in the Pacific for the next 50 
years." 
 
In the hearing, there was a question suggesting the necessity of 
reconsidering the Guam relocation plan since the costs of moving 
Marines to Guam and stationing them on Guam are higher than 
initially estimated. In response, Conway answered: "The Quadrennial 
Defense Review (QDR) will take that move into their consideration 
before issuing the report. Problems including quality of the Futenma 
replacement facility will be considered and there will be a 
recommendation coming out of the QDR. 
 
Next, Conway was asked if he was going to recommend a change in the 
plan. He answered: "We have some modifications we think are worthy 
of consideration. The Futenma replacement facility has to be a fully 
capable replacement for what we're giving up on Okinawa. We are 
concerned about training opportunities on Guam, in the nearby 
islands as well as the rest of the Asia-Pacific basin. So there are 
some things like that that we certainly want to see considered and 
negotiated as need be with the Japanese government." The Marine 
Corps seems to be dissatisfied with the planned construction of a 
new base at Henoko because the newly planned facility is the same as 
Futenma airfield with respect to the distance from local 
communities, and its flight training there will be substantially 
restricted. 
 
Ginowan City has raised an objection to the relocation of Futenma 
airfield within Okinawa Prefecture and has insisted on closing the 
Futenma base by relocating it outside Japan. We will continue to 
call for Futenma airfield to be closed. 
 
 
TOKYO 00001502  013 OF 014 
 
 
(12) Interview with Hitoshi Tanaka, senior fellow at Japan Center 
for International Exchange, on G-8 Summit: Japan should work for 
diversified cooperation 
 
MAINICHI (Page 7) (Full) 
July 1, 2009 
 
Summarized by Yudai Nakazawa 
 
The international order on which postwar Japanese diplomacy is 
founded is changing. As China, India, and other newly emerging 
economies rise, the United States' power has declined. 
 
However, the G-8 should continue to play a leadership role. Although 
the G-20 (participants in the financial summit) is an important 
forum, I do not think decisions can be made easily. A framework with 
the G-8 at the center and the MEF (Major Economies Forum), G-20, and 
so forth forming concentric circles will be desirable. No 
knowledgeable person in the world today believes in the concept of 
G-2, consisting of the United States and China. 
 
Since 2002, the U.S. and Europe have been in conflict over the Iraq 
war, which brought about changes in the G-8. However, the Obama 
administration, which favors international cooperation, will not 
ignore the strong opposition of the other advanced countries. G-8 
unity is important at a time the international community is building 
a consensus on the North Korea issue. On the Iran issue, since the 
U.S., which had previously refused to engage in direct negotiations, 
will now be involved, the G-8 will be able to coordinate this. 
 
With the U.S. shifting to a policy of international cooperation, 
this is no longer an era where Japan can coordinate its policy only 
with the U.S. It should draw up diverse strategies and strengthen 
cooperation with various countries. 
 
Japan's peace and prosperity depends on the future of East Asia. It 
will have to open up new horizons on its own in terms of the role it 
plays. It needs to show a clear intent to promote economic 
cooperation and integration in this region, while resolving the 
North Korea problem and other issues. 
 
East Asian countries have diverse political systems, cultures, and 
religions, so a grand community like the European Union (EU) is 
unrealistic. It is better for them to look for common interests in 
the economic, security, and other fields and create corresponding 
frameworks. Cooperation on specific "non-traditional security" 
issues, such as an economic community, prevention of the 
proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, and natural disasters 
should be possible. It is necessary to take advantage of the 
Japan-U.S. security arrangements in East Asia. 
 
The Japan-U.S. alliance will continue to be important to make sure 
that China does not become a hegemonic power in the future. However, 
a relationship where the players have common trade and economic 
standards but engage in mutual deterrence in the area of security 
gives rise to contradictions. So Japan, the United States, and China 
should create frameworks for dialogue and make efforts to build 
confidence, such as by ensuring military transparency. 
 
Japan is doing the right thing by making contributions to 
Afghanistan and other countries in the civilian sectors. However, 
can this be a substitute for what it should be doing for 
 
TOKYO 00001502  014 OF 014 
 
 
international security? Unlike during the Cold War era, it will no 
longer be acceptable for Japan to argue that it cannot participate 
in actions recognized as legitimate by the international community, 
using the Constitution as an excuse. It will be necessary to discuss 
the right of collective self-defense again after the domestic 
political situation stabilizes. 
 
ZUMWALT