Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09STATE80210, RESPONSE TO OLA REGARDING UN ROLE IN COUNTER

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE80210.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09STATE80210 2009-07-31 22:10 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Secretary of State
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHC #0210 2122226
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 312210Z JUL 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 7070
INFO UN SECURITY COUNCIL COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
UNCLAS STATE 080210 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: UNSC PREL PHUM PHSA EWWT KCRM SO XA XY
SUBJECT: RESPONSE TO OLA REGARDING UN ROLE IN COUNTER 
PIRACY EFFORTS 
 
REF: USUN 697 
 
1.  USUN may draw from the talking points in paragraph 2 with 
the objective of strongly discouraging UN Office of Legal 
Affairs (OLA) proposals regarding the UN role in counter 
piracy efforts. 
 
2.  Begin talking points: 
 
-- As reflected in its prior written communications, the 
United States strongly discourages any UN Secretariat efforts 
to develop a "UN model bilateral transfer agreement." 
Production of a model agreement sanctioned by the UN could 
cast doubt on any existing arrangements that differ from the 
UN model.  Moreover, any &model8 agreement is likely to be 
over- or  under-inclusive.  The advantage of these bilateral 
instruments is that they address the particular domestic 
legal and procedural issues that may arise when the 
participants undertake the transfer of a piracy suspect. 
Each state may have slightly different requirements.  The UK 
has already provided a template to Contact Group participants 
to assist countries that are interested in negotiating their 
own bilateral transfer arrangements. This template serves the 
purpose of aiding and encouraging countries to enter into 
these arrangements, but does not impose terms on states the 
way a UN model agreement could be seen to do. 
--  We would encourage OLA to attend the next meeting of the 
Contact Group,s legal working group (WG2) in Copenhagen on 
August 26-27.  The UN and OLA were represented at the last 
legal working group meeting, and we would hope that they 
would continue to participate and follow what the legal 
working group is doing. 
--  The United States would encourage the OLA to lend the 
legal working group its expertise with respect to the Terms 
of Reference that are being developed to establish an 
International Trust Fund.  This Trust Fund is being 
established to directly support prosecutions. 
--  We would also encourage OLA to work with the UN Office of 
Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and International Maritime 
Organization (IMO) to help coordinate the various judicial 
capacity-building efforts that are underway.  In addition, we 
encourage the OLA to work with the UNODC and IMO to encourage 
regional states such as Tanzania to amend their domestic law 
to permit the prosecution of suspects even when there is no 
national nexus and to enter into transfer arrangements with 
interdicting states in order to relieve some of the burden on 
Kenya. 
--  The United States would encourage consideration and study 
by the OLA of the possibilities for the eventual transfer of 
convicted suspects from Kenya and other prosecuting states to 
Somalia.  We would note that, in our judgment, such transfers 
are not feasible at the present time, but we would not be 
opposed to studying the situation and analyzing the 
circumstances that would be necessary for such transfers to 
take place. 
--  Finally, the United States would strongly encourage OLA 
to support our view that a state should favorably consider 
prosecuting suspects when it is the flag state of the ship 
that was attacked, or the vessel was owned or crewed by its 
nationals. 
End Points. 
CLINTON