Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09AITTAIPEI867, MEDIA REACTION: AFGHANISTAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09AITTAIPEI867.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09AITTAIPEI867 2009-07-20 09:42 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0016
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #0867 2010942
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 200942Z JUL 09
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1962
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9290
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 0723
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 000867 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/P, EAP/PD - NIDA EMMONS 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: AFGHANISTAN 
 
Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused news 
coverage July 18-20 on the 2009 World Games, which began in 
Kaohsiung the evening of the 16th; on U.S. TV news legend Walter 
Cronkite, who passed away in New York last Friday; on the results of 
this year's university entrance exams in Taiwan; and on the 
celebration of the fortieth anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon 
landing on July 20.  In terms of editorials and commentaries, a 
column in the pro-unification "United Daily News" discussed the 
recent incident in which a U.S. soldier was captured in Afghanistan. 
 The article questioned whether U.S. President Barack Obama has 
miscalculated regarding his plan to send more U.S. troops to 
Afghanistan.  End summary. 
 
"Obama Miscalculates [the Decision to] Augment Troops in 
Afghanistan?" 
 
A column in the pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 
400,000] wrote (7/20): 
 
"U.S. President Barack Obama, since taking over the helm, has made 
two major revisions to his strategic plans concerning the 
battlefields of Afghanistan and Iraq, respectively.  He has placed a 
priority on the war in Afghanistan and continuously sent [more] U.S. 
troops to the country over the past few months.  The 32,000 U.S. 
soldiers originally stationed in Afghanistan will be increased to 
68,000 by the end of this year.  Together with the 36,000 soldiers 
from other allies who are also stationed in Afghanistan, the move is 
aimed at securing a smooth presidential election in Afghanistan on 
August 20 and fighting a quick battle with the Taliban.  But the 
recent military actions by the United States to suppress the Taliban 
have resulted in frequent injuries and deaths.  The worst case was 
that of the first U.S. soldier to be captured since the United 
States sent troops to Afghanistan in 2001. ...  It appears that 
Obama's [decision to] send more troops to Afghanistan will likely 
start with a bang and end with a fizzle.  One of the reasons for 
such a failure is that [Washington] has failed to learn from the 
lesson of the former Soviet Union [in Afghanistan]." 
 
WANG