VZCZCXRO7334
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1328/01 1630707
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 120707Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3690
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 6882
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4551
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 8354
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 2132
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 5077
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9815
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 5842
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 5562

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 11 TOKYO 001328 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 06/12/09 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Emperor, Empress to lay flowers at Pacific Memorial Cemetery, 
PKO Monument in Ottawa during visit to Canada, Hawaii (Jiji) 
 
(2) Prime minister to replace Minister of Internal Affairs and 
Communications Hatoyama (Yomiuri) 
 
(3) Reappointment of Japan Post president hitting rocky ground; Aso 
unable to make up mind (Mainichi) 
 
(4) Coalition with SDP poses challenge to DPJ due to gap over 
foreign and security policies (Yomiuri) 
 
(5) Sanctions' true worth to be tested; United Nations may adopt new 
resolution on North Korea today (Nikkei) 
 
(6) "Seiron" column: Time to prepare for regime change in North 
Korea (Sankei) 
 
(7) Behind the appointment of the U.S. ambassador to Japan (Bungei 
Shunju) 
 
(8) An order from Vice Minister Yabunaka (Bungei Shunju) 
 
(9) Mr. Shii makes pro-Obama declaration? (Mainichi) 
 
(10) Former POW and families visiting Japan June 14; "Want to hear 
apology from Prime Minister Aso" for forced labor at his father's 
mine (Mainichi) 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Emperor, Empress to lay flowers at Pacific Memorial Cemetery, 
PKO Monument in Ottawa during visit to Canada, Hawaii 
 
JIJI.COM (Full) 
10:04, June 12, 2009 
 
The itinerary for the official visit of the Emperor and the Empress 
to Canada and Hawaii was reported at the cabinet meeting on the 
morning of June 12. The imperial couple will offer flowers at the 
National Peacekeeping Monument in Ottawa honoring UN peacekeeping 
operations and at the National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific 
dedicated to the fallen American soldiers on Oahu Island in Hawaii. 
They will not visit Pearl Harbor. 
 
The visit will be for 15 days from July 3-17. According to the 
Imperial Household Agency, the Peacekeeping Monument is in honor of 
Canadian peacekeeping operations. The names of Canadians who 
participated in such operations are inscribed on the monument. In 
Ottawa, the imperial couple will attend a welcome reception hosted 
by the governor general, where the Emperor will deliver a speech. 
 
(2) Prime minister to replace Minister of Internal Affairs and 
Communications Hatoyama 
 
YOMIURI ONLINE (Full) 
13:49, June 12, 2009 
 
Prime Minister Taro Aso met Minister of Internal Affairs and 
Communications Kunio Hatoyama for about 40 minutes at the Prime 
 
TOKYO 00001328  002 OF 011 
 
 
Minister's Office Residence (Kantei) on the morning of June 12 to 
discuss the appointment of the Japan Post president. 
 
Aso informed Hatoyama that he intended to retain Yoshifumi Nishikawa 
as Japan Post president with certain conditions. 
 
Since Hatoyama objected to this, the prime minister intends to 
replace him. 
 
Hatoyama has been strongly opposed to Nishikawa keeping his job. 
However, he had stated at a news conference on the same day that if 
asked by the prime minister to resign, he would accept the request. 
There have been growing calls in the government and ruling parties 
for an early solution to this problem out of concern over its impact 
on the next House of Representatives election. Aso and Hatoyama are 
expected to meet again in the afternoon to settle the issue. 
 
(3) Reappointment of Japan Post president hitting rocky ground; Aso 
unable to make up mind 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
June 12, 2009 
 
Prime Minister Taro Aso has been unable to make a decision on 
whether to reappoint Japan Post Holdings Co. President Yoshifumi 
Nishikawa. Internal Affairs and Communications Minister Kunio 
Hatoyama has still called for Nishikawa's resignation hiding behind 
his authorization authority. However, some in the government and 
ruling parties are criticizing Hatoyama for his grandstanding. Every 
time Aso listens to each side's opinion, his view sways back and 
forth. Although the government and ruling coalition intend to 
resolve the issue before the planned party-heads debate on June 17, 
Aso has yet to make up his mind. Therefore, persons around Aso are 
having difficulties in coordinating views. 
 
According to persons around Aso, the Prime Minister initially 
decided to resolve the issue by dismissing Hatoyama. Judging that 
Hatoyama was adamant, Aso has shifted his position to urge Nishikawa 
to voluntarily step down from his post. Aso reportedly instructed 
Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura to urge Nishikawa to quit his 
post. 
 
The Prime Minister's Official Residence (Kantei) explored how 
business circles were thinking about the issue, including possible 
candidates to succeed Nishikawa. However, former Prime Minister 
Junichiro Koizumi and other LDP members, who showed Nishikawa 
special treatment to persuade him to serve as Japan Post president, 
furiously opposed the idea of replacing Nishikawa. Since Nishikawa 
has no intention to leave his post, a cautious view would gain 
ground that if Nishikawa quits, the public would take such as 
retreat from the government's reform efforts. 
 
The idea of punishing both persons is now emerging. Both Hatoyama 
and Nishikawa are unlikely to quit their posts. There is also a 
rumor that Aso would urge Nishikawa to resign and shuffle the 
cabinet to remove Hatoyama and give him a key post in the Liberal 
Democratic Party (LDP). 
 
Aso has instructed Hatoyama to hold discussion with Kawamura and 
Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano. Kawamura and Deputy Chief Cabinet 
Secretary Katsuhito Asano called Hatoyama on the night of June 9 to 
urge him to restrain his remarks. However, Hatoyama expressed his 
 
TOKYO 00001328  003 OF 011 
 
 
annoyance with Kawamura on the phone with a government official on 
June 10, arguing: "Please tell the Prime Minister that I don't want 
to be told by the chief cabinet secretary." 
 
For the reason that he supported Aso in the three LDP presidential 
elections, the emotional strain has made the situation more 
complicated. 
 
Aso told the press corps yesterday evening: "I haven't made up my 
mind. I feel that I should put an end to the issue as early as 
possible." Aso has yet to find any answer to "a very difficult 
question." 
 
(4) Coalition with SDP poses challenge to DPJ due to gap over 
foreign and security policies 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Abridged slightly) 
June 12, 2009 
 
The Social Democratic Party (SDP) at a meeting of the standing 
committee on June 11 decided to enter talks on the establishing of a 
coalition government with the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) after 
the next Lower House election. The SDP and the DPJ are now faced 
with a heavy challenge due to differences in their diplomatic and 
security policies. 
 
The SDP has decided to join coalition talks with the DPJ, because it 
has determined that it would be advantageous for it to make "change 
of government" its policy slogan, backed by coalition with the DPJ, 
which is regaining support ratings with the assumption of Hatoyama 
as party head. When Secretary General Shigeno at the standing 
committee meeting asked views of members about participation in the 
coalition talks, most members voiced a positive view, saying that 
since people are pinning high hopes on a change of administration, 
it is advantageous to call for participation in coalition 
government. President Fukushima, who has been cautious about the 
idea, told reporters in the Diet building on the afternoon of the 
11th, "I want to make a public appeal that the SDP is needed for new 
politics and to present the big picture of our identity." 
 
The DPJ and the People's New Party (PNP) have already mapped out 
five proposals as common policies for the next Lower House election: 
(1) leaving the sales tax unchanged; (2) revision to the postal 
privatization; (3) abolition of the new medical service system for 
very old people (for elderly people aged 75 or older); (4) building 
a safety network to protect employment; and (5) free education for 
high school students. They are now calling on the SDP to join the 
coalition talks. 
 
The SDF intends to ask during talks with the DPJ and the PNP to add 
a policy of relocating U.S. bases in Okinawa outside the prefecture, 
after accepting those proposals. 
 
DPJ President Hatoyama told reporters at the party headquarters that 
he welcomes the SDP's decision. He said, "Given the situation in the 
Upper House, even if the DPJ wins the Lower House election, it will 
be impossible for it to form a one-party administration. Forming a 
coalition government is the most plausible way. We appreciate that 
the DPJ is trying to make a decision in a positive manner." He also 
said, "It is necessary to further deepen discussions on such issues 
as security. It is important to throw away small differences and 
agree on big similarities." 
 
TOKYO 00001328  004 OF 011 
 
 
 
(5) Sanctions' true worth to be tested; United Nations may adopt new 
resolution on North Korea today 
 
NIKKEI (Page 3) (Excerpts) 
June 12, 2009 
 
Hiroyuki Nakamae, New York 
 
Following an agreement reached on a draft resolution condemning 
North Korea's second nuclear test, the five permanent UN Security 
Council members plus Japan and South Korea are seeking the 
understanding of other members to hold a plenary session as early as 
June 11 for the adoption of the resolution. The draft resolution 
specifies sanctions aiming to increase pressure in terms of money 
and goods. For the effectiveness of the resolution, attention will 
be focused on the activities of the Sanctions Committee which is to 
determine specific financial steps and assets subject to a freeze 
under the Security Council. 
 
The Sanctions Committee was established in accordance with 
Resolution 1718, adopted following North Korea's first nuclear test 
in October 2006. In addition to monitoring the level of 
implementation of sanctions by each member country, the committee 
has the authority to identify organizations and individuals subject 
to sanctions. But the body has not conducted substantial discussions 
over the last two and a half years. 
 
This time around, the draft resolution includes a plan to strengthen 
the committee's functions in order to increase the effectiveness of 
the sanction. The resolution specifically proposes the establishment 
of a team composed of up to seven experts that is tasked with 
producing, within 30 days of the resolution's adoption, lists of 
organizations and individuals subject to the measures specified in 
the 2006 and new sanctions. 
 
Focus will be on work to determine steps and assets to be frozen in 
the financial sector, on which the United States and other countries 
pin high hopes. In putting specific organizations and individuals on 
the list as connected with weapons of mass destruction (WMD), a 
certain factor is necessary that is convincing to everyone, 
according to Japanese Ambassador to UN Yukio Takasu. A UN source 
also thinks that some countries might be unwilling to disclose 
classified information. All those elements would make it difficult 
for the discussion to move forward, and as a result, the Sanctions 
Committee is expected to be pressed to play a greater role. 
 
Japan has put an embargo on luxury goods and WMD-connected items 
under the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Law. Likewise, 
adjustments will have to be made in accordance with each member 
country's domestic legislation. Fierce wheeling and dealing is 
likely to take place over the selection of the members of the expert 
team. 
 
Participation by China and Russia indispensable 
 
Atsushi Ijuin, senior writer 
 
Less than 40 percent of the UN members reported to the world body on 
what steps they had taken by last year since the adoption of a UN 
resolution in response to North Korea's first nuclear test in 2006. 
Despite condemnation from the international community, the North has 
 
TOKYO 00001328  005 OF 011 
 
 
always had escape routes. 
 
North Korea, which was supposed to be under sanctions, recorded an 
18-year high in its trade last year. Without participation by China 
and Russia who account for 70 percent of North Korea's trade, the 
new resolution would be ineffective. Controls on the 
smuggler-infested China-DPRK border will be a challenge as well. 
 
Even if strict sanctions are applied, the North, which has many 
complicated domestic issues, including the question of determining 
General Secretary Kim Jong Il's successor, will probably not comply 
with international demands so easily. There is an observation that 
the country will launch more missiles and make provocative acts 
using armed forces. Furthermore, the country might attempt to jolt 
the international community by using such tools as captured 
foreigners and economic cooperation. 
 
This can explain why the international cooperative system must be 
maintained and examined. The United Nations must also follow up its 
sanctions, major countries concerned should hold talks, and the 
Japan-U.S. and the U.S.-ROK alliances must be enhanced. All member 
countries must make ceaseless efforts to keep their ego under 
control to maintain international unity. 
 
(6) "Seiron" column: Time to prepare for regime change in North 
Korea 
 
SANKEI (Page 7) (Full) 
June 12, 2009 
 
Hiroshi Nakanishi, professor at Kyoto University Graduate School 
 
Domestic factors not the only reason for provocations 
 
North Korea is stepping up its provocative actions. It fired a 
long-range ballistic missile on April 5, calling this a satellite 
launch, and conducted its second underground nuclear test on May 25. 
Moreover, the DPRK has declared that its demarcation agreement with 
the ROK is now void; it has reportedly built new missile bases; and 
there are signs of preparations to launch more missiles. It would 
appear that North Korea's actions have come at a faster pace than 
those in 2006, when it launched several missiles and conducted its 
first nuclear test. 
 
Why is North Korea behaving like this right now? Domestic factors 
have often been cited recently. After General Secretary Kim Jong Il 
fell ill last summer, his health problem and future successor have 
quickly emerged as an issue. His three sons (Jong Nam, Jong Chol, 
and Jong Un) and brother-in-law Chang Song Taek have been mentioned 
as possible successors, and there are reports claiming that the 
third son, Jong Un, has been picked as the heir. 
 
However, one needs to have some reservations about such a view. It 
is almost certain that General Secretary Kim indeed fell ill last 
year, and it is quite probable that moves relating to the succession 
process have actually emerged in the DPRK leadership. Such moves are 
important for the mid- and long-term. However, it is probably not 
productive to link the DPRK's present provocations with this and 
that in the internal situation in that country. 
 
At the end of the day, very little is known about how the internal 
circumstances in North Korea affect its foreign policy. Furthermore, 
 
TOKYO 00001328  006 OF 011 
 
 
while the recent moves have indeed been abrupt, they have been 
well-managed, and nothing suggests divisions within the DPRK 
leadership. 
 
Six-Party Talks now hopeless 
 
For now, it is reasonable to think that North Korea's actions were 
triggered by international factors. Its behavior can be explained 
with this view. 
 
The Obama administration's policy toward North Korea is probably the 
basic motive behind the DPRK's behavior. It appears that there had 
been expectations that the Obama government would be conciliatory 
when the administration was inaugurated. The joint editorial of 
North Korean newspapers on New Year's Day that mentioned the 
"denuclearization of the Korean peninsula," and contained this 
passage, "We will develop relations with countries that are friendly 
with us and actively contribute to achieving the great cause of 
making the world independent," is probably an indication of such 
expectations. However, the Obama administration has maintained its 
position of demanding North Korea's abandonment of its nuclear 
programs. It can be said that irked by this, the DPRK escalated its 
provocation from firing a long-range missile "for peaceful purposes" 
to a nuclear test. 
 
The ROK is another factor. In contrast to the previous Roh Moo Hyun 
administration, which adopted a conciliatory policy, the Lee Myung 
Bak administration is leaning toward cooperation with Japan and the 
U.S. and a policy of applying pressure on the North. The ROK is 
important for the DPRK more as a shield to keep off Japanese and 
U.S. pressure than for the economic benefits it brings. With the 
change in the ROK's posture, the DPRK appears to have heightened 
tension with the South in an attempt to divide public opinion in the 
ROK and drive a wedge into the cooperation among Japan, the U.S., 
and South Korea. It might have regarded the death of former 
President Roh Moo Hyun as a good opportunity. 
 
North Korea's ultimate goal in its provocations is probably to 
obtain a guarantee for its political regime through dialogue with 
the U.S. Under the present situation where Japan, the U.S., and ROK 
have strengthened their unity, and China and Russia are cooperating 
to a certain extent, North Korea is unlikely to return to the 
Six-Party Talks. It is probably pinning more hope on bilateral talks 
with the U.S. 
 
Japan and the four other Six-Party Talks participants would like 
North Korea to stop any further provocative actions and return to 
the talks. How will North Korea react to the UN Security Council's 
adoption of a sanction resolution against it? It will probably be 
possible to topple the Kim Jong Il regime if the United States uses 
military force or if China imposes a complete embargo. 
 
However, since no country is willing and able to take responsibility 
for the over 20 million North Korean people after that, this is not 
an option. 
 
Re-listing as terrorism sponsor 
 
It is highly possible that sanctions short of toppling the regime 
will draw a strong reaction from North Korea, triggering further 
provocative actions. However, rewarding its blatant violation of 
international law is out of the question. 
 
TOKYO 00001328  007 OF 011 
 
 
 
Herein lies the dilemma of the North Korea issue. Yet, certain 
sanctions will have to be imposed, efforts to communicate with its 
leadership will have to be made, and venues for dialogue - (with the 
DPRK's participation) to be rewarded with the lifting of sanctions - 
will have to be set up. The United States' re-listing of North Korea 
as a state sponsor of terrorism may be useful for this purpose. 
 
Japan has already imposed various sanctions, so it has little leeway 
to do more. While calling on other nations to impose sanctions, it 
should deter the DPRK from further provocations and be prepared to 
respond rapidly to contain the situation if it embarks on illegal 
acts. 
 
In any event, the DPRK's abandonment of its missiles and nuclear 
arms and a solution to the abduction issue are unlikely without a 
regime change in that country - that is, either General Secretary 
Kim is incapacitated or dies. While this is indeed an annoying fact, 
nothing can be done about this inasmuch as North Korea is, in 
effect, a dictatorial dynasty. The day may not be far off. In 
preparation for this eventuality, the best thing Japan can do right 
now is to prevent North Korea's provocations from developing into a 
crisis and create the international environment for dealing with a 
regime change in the DPRK. 
 
(7) Behind the appointment of the U.S. ambassador to Japan 
 
BUNGEI SHUNJU (Pages 234-235) (Full) 
July 2009 
 
There has been a significant decline in the power of the Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs (MOFA) (Current vice minister is Mitoji Yabunaka, 
who joined the ministry in 1969). 
 
Both the Japanese embassy in the U.S. (under Ambassador Ichiro 
Fujisaki) and the North American Affairs Bureau (under Director 
General Kazuyoshi Umemoto, MOFA batch of 1977), which is in charge 
of U.S. relations, were unable to catch the White House's 
appointment of Silicon Valley lawyer John Roos as U.S. ambassador to 
Japan in advance. The conclusion from their investigation, 
mobilizing even former vice minister Shotaro Yachi, that the 
ambassador is "likely to be an incumbent or former member of 
Congress" was way off the mark. 
 
Rather than being unable to catch any information, it appears that 
MOFA had believed in the bylined report by Asahi Shimbun's 
Washington Bureau chief Yoichi Kato early this year that "Harvard 
University Professor Joseph Nye is certain to become next ambassador 
to Japan." In fact, it is said that a senior North American Affairs 
Bureau official was the source of Mainichi Shimbun's report on April 
18 confirming that "U.S. Ambassador to Japan Nye to take up post 
around summer." 
 
The decline in Japan's ability to gather information on the Obama 
administration is not limited to MOFA. The Ministry of Economy, 
Trade, and Industry (under Vice Minister Harufumi Mochizuki, batch 
of 1973) also spends a lot of money for information gathering by the 
New York Office of JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization) under 
its supervision. Yet, this New York Office had been reporting until 
very late in the process that "Nye's appointment is certain." 
 
This shows how far away the so-called "experts on the U.S." in Japan 
 
TOKYO 00001328  008 OF 011 
 
 
and the so-called "experts on Japan" in the U.S. are now from the 
center of the Obama administration. 
 
Nye, the original favorite to take up the post, is an advocate of 
the concept of "soft power," which emphasizes not only military 
power, but also diplomacy and culture. He is close to former Deputy 
Secretary of State Richard Armitage. While it is true that Secretary 
Hillary Clinton had led efforts in the State Department to consider 
Nye's appointment as ambassador to Japan, Japanese media reports 
were based on the impression of "Japan experts" like Armitage and 
former National Security Council director for Asia Michael Green. 
These Japan experts monopolize contacts with Japanese companies and 
politicians and form a small circle of close acquaintances in a kind 
of "mutual admiration society." Even after the turnover from a 
Republican to a Democratic government, theirs is a mechanism to 
protect mutual interest by dispatching officials on Japanese affairs 
from their exclusive circle. Assistant Secretary of State for East 
Asia Kurt Campbell is also a member of this inner circle. 
 
Since they do not have any connections with Roos, both the so-called 
"experts on the U.S." and the "experts on Japan" are dissatisfied, 
calling his appointment a "downgrade." Yet, these very people are 
the culprits for the lack of stability in the Japan-U.S. 
relationship. Perhaps it is time to say goodbye to this inner 
circle. 
 
(8) An order from Vice Minister Yabunaka 
 
BUNGEISHUNJU (Page 235) (Full) 
July, 2009 
 
Another matter that officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs 
(MOFA) currently complain about is Vice Minister Mitoji Yabunaka's 
new "order." Just before the Golden Week holidays in May, Yabunaka 
suddenly ordered the senior officials to translate the concept of 
"arc of freedom and prosperity" announced by Prime Minister Taro Aso 
when he was foreign minister into policies by the end of June. 
 
Yabunaka, on his part, made hasty visits to India, Turkey, Slovakia, 
and the other countries that form the core of this concept during 
the holidays, dealing with this matter haphazardly all along, which 
was reportedly criticized by senior bureaucrats. He probably became 
frantic, having been told by the prime minister, "Can't we use that 
concept for something?" 
 
Bureau chief class MOFA officials are currently nervous that they 
may lose their jobs if the Democratic Party of Japan takes over the 
administration. By convention, Yabunaka's successor should be 
Kenichiro Sasae (class of 1974), deputy minister for foreign affairs 
in charge of Diet affairs. However, plans are even being considered 
to freeze the personnel changes this summer and postpone them to the 
winter, after the election is held. Since the bureaucrats are so 
engrossed in self-preservation, they probably have not had time to 
gather information (on the next U.S. ambassador to Japan). 
 
(9) Mr. Shii makes pro-Obama declaration? 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Almost full) 
Evening, June 10, 2009 
 
Takuma Suzuki 
 
 
TOKYO 00001328  009 OF 011 
 
 
Japanese Communist Party (JCP) Chairman Kazuo Shii sent a letter to 
U.S. President Barack Obama, sympathizing with him for declaring in 
a speech given in Prague that he will seek a world free of nuclear 
arms. Shii was overjoyed when he received a letter of response from 
the U.S. government. It was as if he had received a reply to a love 
letter. 
 
(On the day this reporter visited Shii,) the rain had just stopped, 
and a red flag was whipping on the roof of the JCP's headquarters 
building in Yoyogi, Tokyo. I was surprised to find the rooftop 
covered with fresh green shrubbery all over. There is even a small 
pond and a small stream. Mr. Shii appears to be proud of them."It's 
nice, isn't it? Roses are beautiful. Hydrangeas are colorful." There 
is a wisteria trellis. I asked him, "How about having a beer garden 
here?" "That sounds fun. Why don't we do it?" 
 
I knew that the JCP is up and running these days due to the renewed 
popularity of "Kanikosen" (Crab Processing Ship, a book written by 
Takiji Kobayashi and published in 1929). It appears to be getting 
even more of boost from the letter from the Obama administration. It 
all started with President Obama's speech in Prague on April 5. 
Encouraged by Obama's enthusiasm about eliminating nuclear arms, 
Chairman Shii wrote a letter, noting that was deeply impressed by 
his speech. He visited Charge' d'Affaires ad interim James Zumwalt 
at the U.S. Embassy in Japan and handed the letter to him. This was 
the first visit ever to the U.S. Embassy by a representative of the 
JCP. 
 
"(I visited the U.S. Embassy to hand my letter) because I myself was 
impressed by the president's speech. I think it was an historic 
speech. I took note of three remarks he made. First, he for the 
first time (as the president of the U.S.) categorically said that he 
would make elimination of nuclear arms a national goal. Second, he 
for the first time (as the president of the U.S.) spoke of America's 
moral responsibility for eliminating nuclear arms. He said that the 
use of atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was an issue that 
concerns the moral principles of humankind. Third, he called on the 
world to cooperate. There are many differences in the stances of the 
JCP and the U.S. government. But because he has taken the first step 
forward, I want to help him realize his proposal in international 
politics. I wanted to convey this feeling of mine to the 
president." 
 
It was a love letter to President Obama, so to speak. Mr. Shii did 
not expect a response. However, a letter arrived at the party 
headquarters on May 16. The letter was written by Deputy Assistant 
Secretary Davis at the order of the president. The letter, which 
started off with "Dear Mr. Shii," carried a line "I appreciate your 
enthusiasm." "I was at home at that time. My secretary faxed it to 
me. To be honest, I was surprised. I felt the sincerity of Mr. 
Obama. The letter was short but very polished. I thought he felt my 
enthusiasm." 
 
"You are saying that we have mutual affection in pursuit of an 
anti-nuclear and peace policy? Ha, ha, ha. I frankly wrote that I 
cannot agree with some of the points made in the Prague speech. That 
is because he said that it would be probably impossible to realize a 
world free of nuclear arms while he is alive. No countries have ever 
pursued any talks to eliminate nuclear arms. They have not even 
called for such. They should be able to tackle it, only if they 
intend to. I think that it is meaningful that an official channel 
has been established as a result of such exchanges of letters." 
 
TOKYO 00001328  010 OF 011 
 
 
 
At any rate, why did Mr. Shii send a letter to President Obama? I do 
not quite understand that. He could have just issued a statement 
welcoming his speech. When I was puzzled, Mr. Shii gave me a piece 
of paper with a bashful look. He said that it is a copy from the 
complete works of Marks and Engels. Mr. Shii read out some lines 
from a congratulatory letter Marx had sent to President Lincoln when 
he was reelected. 
 
"The land where the idea of a great democratic republic was created 
for the first time... The first human rights declaration was made 
there. It is the land that gave the first shockwave to revolutions 
in Europe in the 18th century. Yes, our great predecessor had deep 
respect to the history of the U.S. Lincoln responded to this letter 
of Marx. I believe President Obama respects Lincoln. He has 
repeatedly quoted Lincoln's statements." 
 
I see, Marx is likened to Mr. Shii and Lincoln to President Obama. 
Mr. Shii followed the secret episode between a communist and a U.S. 
president. "I do not mean that. However, the Obama administration 
does not discriminate against or ignore the communist party. I was 
assured of that from his letter. Now we have a branch bureau of 
Shimbun Akahata in Washington. We were unable to go to the U.S. for 
some time after the war just because we were communists. For 
instance, when our delegation went to Europe via Reykjavik, they 
were not allowed to go outside the airport. There was such a time." 
 
From a fragment of his conversation, I even felt his sympathy with 
the U.S., which communists once called "Imperialist U.S." I, 
therefore, asked to see to what extent he is Americanized. "Do you 
eat McDonalds?" "Yes, I do." "How about jeans?" "I wore them when I 
was a student." "Have you been to the Disneyland?" "Yes. When my 
child was small, we went there together." "Do you like jazz?" "Yes, 
I do. I was learning the piano when I was a high school student. My 
teacher told me how to play jazz." 
 
Unexpectedly, he is pro-American, or rather a very ordinary 
Japanese. "Of course, the party platform stipulates that the U.S. is 
imperialist." However, it also says that it must be looked at from 
various perspectives. We will give high scores to it, if a 
forward-looking change occurs there, reflecting public opinion in 
the world. True friendship will be created through the principle of 
equality and impartiality, instead of rule and obedience as was the 
case in the past. I want to have a Japan-U.S. friendship treaty 
instead of the Japan-U.S. Security Treaty. That's my wish." Then, 
would you like to go to the U.S. and hold talks with President 
Obama? "We are not discussing such a matter in concrete terms." 
 
Usually you have a date after exchanging love letters. Is it OK for 
you just to run an ad in the Shimbun Akahata? "Ummm. If there is an 
appropriate opportunity, I would like to go to the U.S. I want to 
hear jazz there. I also want to go to Carnegie Hall and the American 
Ballet Theater." He indicated his strong desire to visit the U.S. He 
must be trying to have the JCP emerge from being the "absolute 
opposition party." 
 
"That was a good slogan, but we stopped using it, as somebody said 
to me how long we intend to remain as an opposition party." 
 
(10) Former POW and families visiting Japan June 14; "Want to hear 
apology from Prime Minister Aso" for forced labor at his father's 
mine 
 
TOKYO 00001328  011 OF 011 
 
 
 
MAINICHI (Page 10) (Full) 
Evening, June 11, 2009 
 
Yoji Hanaoka 
 
A former Australian Allied prisoner of war who was forced to work at 
the Yoshikuma Coal Mine (Keisen town, Fukuoka Prefecture) of the 
former Aso Mining Co. run by Prime Minister Taro Aso's father in 
World War II, and a family member of a British POW will visit Japan 
from June 14. This will be the first time for the victims to visit 
Japan after Aso admitted the use of POWs as workers at the House of 
Representatives plenary session in January. They are seeking to meet 
Aso and get an apology from him through concerned officials. 
 
The party visiting Japan consists of former POW Joe Croombs, 88, 
from Sydney, Australia and his two sons and the son of a British 
ex-POW who has died. Croombs was a former corporal in the Australian 
army who surrendered in Singapore in February, 1942. After working 
at a shipyard in Kobe, he was moved to the detention camp at the 
Yoshikuma Mine. He claimed that he was made to work 12-hour day or 
night shifts with no wages paid and was beaten up by the guards. 
 
Croombs sent a letter to Aso in February asking for an apology for 
the forced labor and compensation for the unjust treatment he 
received but has not received a reply. He will be visiting Japan for 
the first time after returning home after the war. He said: "I would 
like to hear an apology from the Japanese prime minister in person. 
His recognition of our suffering will be a consolation to myself and 
my fellow POWs." 
 
The four were invited through funds raised by volunteers in Japan 
studying the POW issue. They will stay in Japan for a week, visiting 
the sites of the old coal mines and companies that used forced 
labor. One of the volunteers, Ken Arimitsu, 58, who works for the 
secretariat of the volunteer group, says that, "Prime Minister Aso's 
apology while he is in office will serve to restore his own honor 
and the honor of Japan." 
 
The Japanese government had denied the use of POWs as forced 
laborers until the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare released 
the relevant documents. It was found that the Yoshikuma Mine used 
300 Allied POWs and a large number of Koreans as workers. Of the 
POWs, 197 were Australians and four of them have been found to be 
still alive. 
 
ZUMWALT