VZCZCXYZ0009
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTV #1339/01 1701409
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 191409Z JUN 09
FM AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2262
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAHQA/HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEADWD/DA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/CNO WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 5568
RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 2147
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 6112
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 6378
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 5611
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 4176
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 6435
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 3245
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1447
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 0137
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 7646
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 2627
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 6640
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 8693
RUEHJI/AMCONSUL JEDDAH PRIORITY 1466
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 2219
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/COMSIXTHFLT  PRIORITY

UNCLAS TEL AVIV 001339 
 
STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD 
 
WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM 
NSC FOR NEA STAFF 
 
SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA 
HQ USAF FOR XOXX 
DA WASHDC FOR SASA 
JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA 
CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR 
COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD 
COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 
 
JERUSALEM ALSO ICD 
LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL 
PARIS ALSO FOR POL 
ROME FOR MFO 
 
SIPDIS 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS
 
SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION 
 
-------------------------------- 
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: 
-------------------------------- 
 
¶1. PM Netanyahu's Speech 
 
¶2. Iran 
 
¶3. Mideast 
 
Block Quotes Only: 
------------------- 
 
 
¶1. PM Netanyahu's Speech 
 
¶I. "The Era of Winks" 
 
Senior commentator Nahum Barnea wrote in the mass-circulation, 
pluralist Yediot Aharonot: "The Bar Ilan speech was a success. It 
created the impression that everything could be done, and yet did 
nothing. It promised, but didn't promise to keep the promise.  In 
his speech, Netanyahu opted to skip over the conditions that he 
posed for negotiations....He is not willing to commit to returning 
the Golan Heights....  The American response [to the speech] was 
two-staged. The White House congratulated, but immediately renewed 
its demand for an absolute freeze on settlement activity. Had 
Netanyahu said that he accepted the two-state solution during his 
visit to Washington, it is possible that this clash could have been 
prevented, but he fell in love with his mistake, and in the 
meantime, the genie got out of the bottle and refused to go back 
in....  Netanyahu's bureau understands the magnitude of the problem. 
What they have trouble understanding there is that the era of winks 
is over. Israel has been fooling the Americans for 41 years. Yigal 
Alon fooled them, Sharon fooled them, Peres fooled them, they were 
the first, and all the others followed in their wake....  On the 
question of the settlements, he [Ehud Barak] tried to sell the 
Americans a mixed package, rich in winks,that included evacuation by 
consent, token clashes and limited construction. They didn't buy the 
package and the settlers didn't buy it. If the crisis continues this 
is liable to muddy security relations between the two countries at a 
critical time." 
 
 II. "We're the Guys with a Strategy" 
Shalom Yerushalmi, political columnist, wrote in the popular, 
pluralist Maariv (6/19):  "Among the right wing, and particularly 
the Likud, they prefer to regard Netanyahu's speech as tactical. 
This is the most convenient for them. They enjoy speaking of a 
colossal and great multi-layered ploy performed by the prime 
minister....  He was just performing an act before the world, they 
say. In any case, he's not actually going to do anything, and if he 
does, the Arabs will ruin everything. But there are also other 
assessments out there... that Netanyahu is undergoing a true change 
of heart and that the moderate texts he recited were more than just 
an act.... According to this thesis, the speech was strategic, not 
just a ploy. Netanyahu has resolved to enter the history books, and 
this did not happen just this week, but rather immediately following 
the election. The speech at Bar Ilan University signaled a real 
breakthrough." 
 
¶2. Iran 
 
¶I. "Arab Rulers Fear it will Happen to Them Too" 
 
Smadar Peri, Arab affairs commentator, wrote in the 
mass-circulation, independent Yediot Aharonot (6/19):  "The 
thunderous silence of the rulers of the Arab world... attests to 
great nervousness. On the one hand, Iran held a democratic election 
campaign, one that does not exist to this day in any of the Arab 
world countries (except perhaps Lebanon, where there was also 
fraud). Four candidates from two yellow camps waged a campaign, 
grappled with juicy television debates and maligned each other below 
the belt. On the other hand, the great fraud of the election results 
reminds millions in the Arab world of what happens in their own 
homes.  Even in the moderate countries, the US's allies, daily life 
is run by means of emergency laws and sudden arrests without 
warrants....  The elections, the fraud and the demonstrations that 
spread throughout Iran are leading the secret organizations kept by 
the Arab dictators to a gloomy conclusion: it is impossible to 
continue to ignore the street. But if they let the dream of 
democracy seep into the polling booths, all the leaders will be 
immediately kicked out, without exception, and if they try to fix 
the results, as they did in Iran, millions will take to the streets 
to protest the phony democracy." 
 
II. Mideast 
¶I. "Litmus Test" 
The conservative, independent Jerusalem Post editorialized (6/19): 
"The claim that capitulating to Hamas in Gaza, out of exasperation 
over their intransigence, will facilitate the prospects of genuine 
peace is unconvincing.  Gaza is a test case for what Israelis can 
expect should Hamas win next January's tentatively scheduled 
Palestinian elections. The lesson so far is that the Islamists are 
apt to choose belligerency over coexistence, even if it causes their 
own people to suffer; and that the international community will side 
with the Palestinians on the grounds that the people should not be 
punished for the policies of its elected leaders....  On Thursday, 
the Red Cross asked to see IDF soldier Gilad Schalit, now three 
years in Hamas captivity. If the international community cannot 
influence Hamas to comply with so basic a humanitarian request, how 
can it credibly guarantee Hamas's behavior once sanctions are 
lifted?" 
CUNNINGHAM