Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09SAOPAULO332, CONTINUED INTEGRITY OF SAO PAULO REFERRAL PROGRAM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09SAOPAULO332.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09SAOPAULO332 2009-06-08 19:16 2011-07-11 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Consulate Sao Paulo
VZCZCXRO4152
RR RUEHRG
DE RUEHSO #0332 1591916
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 081916Z JUN 09 ZDK
FM AMCONSUL SAO PAULO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9258
INFO RHEFHLC/DHS WASHDC
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 0411
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 4379
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 9165
UNCLAS SAO PAULO 000332 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR CA/FPP, INL/HSTC, WHA/BSC, DS/CR/OCI 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KFRD CVIS ASEC BR
SUBJECT: CONTINUED INTEGRITY OF SAO PAULO REFERRAL PROGRAM 
 
Ref: 9 FAM Appendix K, 406 (6) 
 
1.  Summary: A validation study of all 1,333 short-term visitor 
visas issued during FY2008 under Consulate General Sao Paulo's 
referral program found only one overstay and one other problematic 
referral, both Class "B" referrals.  In order to further strengthen 
the integrity of its referral program, post is instituting a 
newly-revised referral school for all current and incoming officers. 
 End Summary. 
 
---------- 
Procedures 
---------- 
 
2.  Sao Paulo's Fraud Prevention Unit (FPU) pulled data on all Class 
"A" and "B" referrals issued by post during FY 2008 (Sept. 1, 2007 - 
Oct. 30, 2008).  During that time period, post issued 189 Class "A" 
referrals, with no refusals, and 1,428 Class "B" referrals, with two 
refusals.  The data was sorted to eliminate all but short-term 
visas, leaving a total of 107 Class "A" and 1,226 Class "B" 
referrals.  Each case was then run against the Department of 
Homeland Security (DHS)'s Arrival-Departure Information System 
(ADIS) database to determine entries, exits, and possible 
overstays. 
 
------- 
Results 
------- 
 
3.  ADIS checks showed that of the 107 Class "A" referrals, 82 (77 
percent) have traveled and returned, 20 (19 percent) have not yet 
traveled, and five (five percent) are in the United States "in 
status," having recently traveled.  The checks for Class "B" 
referrals initially showed that, of the 1,226 cases, 969 (79 
percent) have traveled and returned, 230 (19 percent) have not 
traveled, 16 (1.3 percent) are in the United States "in status," ten 
UCO ("Unconfirmed overstays") and one ERR (expedited removal) at 
port-of-entry.  FPU then called each of the ten UCO's.  Seven were 
located back in Brazil, two contacted are currently living in Spain, 
and one was contacted and confirmed to still be in the United 
States. 
 
4.  The two problematic referrals, both Class "B," originated from 
the same officer in the Political Section.  (Note: The officer in 
question left post almost one year ago.  End note.)  The first case, 
the ERR, was for a Lebanese restaurant owner, legally resident in 
Brazil for 10 years.  The visa was issued based on a request from an 
Atlanta church for the individual to participate in an ecumenical 
choir aimed at bridge-building between the Muslim and Christian 
communities.   On arrival in Atlanta, Customs and Border Protection 
contacted the U.S. church, which denied having invited the 
individual and stated that no such concert was planned.  The one 
confirmed overstay was for the mother of a 15-year-old model to 
accompany the daughter to a contest in the United States.  The 
daughter returned, but the mother stayed. 
 
5.  Comment:  The results of the study demonstrate that Sao Paulo's 
high-volume referral program is fundamentally sound.  In order to 
further strengthen the program, however, the nonimmigrant visa unit 
is instituting a revised Referral School program for all current and 
incoming officers, in accordance with 9 FAM Appendix K, 203. 
 
WHITE