Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09PANAMA518, CORRECTED COPY--DIPLOMATIC CLEARANCE REQUESTS DURING

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09PANAMA518.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09PANAMA518 2009-06-29 17:13 2011-05-31 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Panama
VZCZCXYZ0006
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHZP #0518 1801713
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 291713Z JUN 09 (CCY-TEXT-ADX839ABB-45)
FM AMEMBASSY PANAMA
TO RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
INFO RHMFISS/COMSC WASHINGTON DC
RULGPUA/COMUSNAVSO
RHMFISS/CNO WASHINGTON DC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3537
RHMFISS/COMDT COGARD WASHINGTON DC
RHMFISS/DIRJIATF SOUTH
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RHEHAAA/NSC WASHDC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L PANAMA 000518 
 
C O R R E C T E D  COPY - CLASSIFIED BY LINE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 06/29/2019 
TAGS: PGOV PREL PM
SUBJECT: --CORRECTED COPY--DIPLOMATIC CLEARANCE REQUESTS DURING 
PANAMA'S POLITICAL TRANISITION 
 
CLASSIFIED BY AMBASSADOR BARBAR J. STEPHENSON FOR REASONS 1.4 
(B) AND (D) 
 
1.  (C)  Panama's next President, Ricardo Martinelli, and his 
cabinet will be sworn in on 01 July 2009.  The current 
government is not approving any diplomatic clearance requests 
for ships or aircraft that occur on or after 01 July. 
Beginning on 01 July a new group of officials will be sworn 
in and will be empowered to approve diplomatic clearance 
requests from that point forward.  Since this new group will 
lack familiarity with the diplomatic clearance request 
process, it is vital to our future relationship with the 
incoming government that all ships, aircraft and personnel 
closely adhere to the rules set forth in the Foreign 
Clearance Guide (FCG).  Current guidance may be viewed at: 
www.fcg.pentagon.mil 
 
2.  (C) Failure to closely adhere to this guidance could 
result in violations of Panama's territorial waters and/or 
airspace, and could in turn cause great damage to our 
relationship with the inbound Martinelli administration. 
Therefore, short-notice requests shall be avoided during this 
transition period (especially between 30 June and 13 July 
2009), except for valid emergencies such as MEDEVACS. 
Furthermore, it is imperative that every ship and aircraft 
bound for Panama confirm with DAO Panama City that it has 
received clearance prior to entering Panamanian waters or 
airspace. 
 
3.  (C) Diplomatic clearance requests submitted to DAO Panama 
City that fail to adhere to the advance notice requirements 
set forth in the FCG will be rejected, unless the request is 
related to a genuine emergency. 
STEPHENSON