VZCZCXRO2281
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #1177/01 1460045
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 260045Z MAY 09
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3195
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/USFJ //J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/CTF 72
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 6506
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 4172
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 7974
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 1777
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 4703
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 9440
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 5459
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 5210

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 11 TOKYO 001177 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT: JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 05/26/09 
 
Index: 
North Korea nuclear test: 
1) Ruling and opposition parties all denounce North Korea for 
testing another nuclear weapon  (Mainichi) 
2) Government considering full embargo on all trade with North Korea 
 (Nikkei) 
3) Government did not expect the timing of Pyongyang's latest 
nuclear test  (Yomiuri) 
4) Over 50 North Korean technicians travelled to Iran since April, 
raising suspicions that the trips were related to the nuclear 
weapons program  (Sankei) 
5) Two pundits analyze the significance of the latest North Korea 
nuclear test  (Yomiuri) 
6) U.S., China, Russia denounce North Korea for nuclear testing; UN 
Security Council to meet; President Obama's nuclear free-world idea 
impacted  (Asahi) 
7) Government plans to ask for UN sanctions against North Korea 
(Nikkei) 
8) Nuclear test calls into question future of 6-Party Talks  (Tokyo 
Shimbun) 
 
Defense issues: 
9) U.S. asks Japan to consider the F-35 instead of the F-22 as the 
most suitable aircraft to introduce  (Tokyo Shimbun) 
10) Government and ruling camp considering easing weapons export 
restrictions to allow joint development and commercialization 
(Nikkei) 
 
11) Government to announce new greenhouse gas-reduction target next 
month of 7 PERCENT  compared to 1990  (Mainichi) 
 
12) Hatoyama's Democratic Party of Japan gets boost from favored 
candidate winning the Saitama mayoralty race  (Nikkei) 
 
13) OIE to recognize safety of Japanese beef; Government considering 
easing inspection guidelines (Tokyo Shimbun) 
 
Artciels: 
 
1) Ruling and opposition parties denounce North Korea's second 
nuclear test; Calls for hard-line stance growing in LDP 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
May 26, 2009 
 
Daisuke Ono, Takenori Noguchi, Joichi Sato 
 
The second nuclear test conducted on May 25 by North Korea has drawn 
fire from both ruling and opposition parties in Japan. Japan is 
growing irritated with North Korea, which conducted the test in 
defiance of a UN Security Council sanctions resolution and Japan's 
independent sanctions in reaction to a ballistic missile launch in 
April. Calls are growing in the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) for 
such options as possessing the capability to attack enemy bases and 
stepping up economic sanctions against the North. Meanwhile, the 
major opposition Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) intends to 
formulate its manifesto (campaign pledges) for the next House of 
Representatives Election featuring a Northeast Asia denuclearization 
initiative and other nuclear disarmament policies. 
 
Former prime minister Shinzo Abe of the LDP made the following 
comment to a group of reporters in Fukuoka yesterday: "Japan would 
 
TOKYO 00001177  002 OF 011 
 
 
be the most affected by North Korean missile and nuclear tests. The 
country must be thoroughly prepared." Former finance minister and 
financial services minister Shoichi Nakagawa, too, indicated to the 
Mainichi Shimbun the need to conduct serious discussion on North 
Korea. He indicated the notion that the LDP must study measures 
against North Korea with an eye on its manifesto for the next Lower 
House election. 
 
What Abe has in mind seems to be the possession of the capability of 
striking enemy bases. In 2006, Nakagawa, who was serving as LDP 
Policy Research Council chief at the time, underlined the need for 
Japan to discuss its nuclear options, creating a stir at home and 
abroad. 
 
Mid-level and junior lawmakers, including House of Councillors 
member Ichita Yamamoto, intend to come up with measures to 
strengthen the country's deterrence today, such as the possession of 
an enemy base strike capability, saying that Japan's security is now 
under a greater threat. 
 
Japan has unilaterally imposed sanctions against the North and is 
unable to find a way out of the current deadlock in dealing with the 
North. Given the situation, calls for a hard-line stance are gaining 
ground in the LDP. For instance, Taku Yamasaki, who has been 
advocating a dialogue policy course as chairman of the Parliamentary 
League to Promote Diplomatic Normalization between Japan and North 
Korea, exhibited a stern attitude in Tokyo yesterday, saying: "It is 
impossible for the time being to settle the matter based on a 
dialogue policy course. A response based on a new UN Security 
Council resolution will be necessary." 
 
New Komeito Secretary General Kazuo Kitagawa, too, said to a group 
of reporters in the Diet building: "If (the nuclear test by the 
North) is a fact, we must lodge a strong protest. There is obviously 
a need to consider new sanctions as well." 
 
2) Japan mulling imposition of complete economic embargo on North 
Korea 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Abridged slightly) 
May 26, 2009 
 
In the wake of North Korea's nuclear test yesterday, the government 
has begun studying the option of further tightening its own economic 
sanctions against that country. The discussion is focused on 
shifting a ban on exports to the North, which is now limited to 
luxury goods, to a blanket export ban. But because the country has 
just recently strengthened its sanctions against the North in 
reaction to its launch of a Taepodong-2 missile in April, there are 
only a few "cards" that are at Japan's disposal. 
 
"We will consider what can be used as sanctions against the North in 
the remaining cards," Chief Cabinet Secretary Takeo Kawamura said in 
a press conference yesterday after a Security Council of Japan 
meeting. His comment also exposed the government's angst over the 
limited steps it can take to reinforce its own sanctions. 
 
The international community's reaction to the North after the 
Taepodong-2 launch was not monolithic. As such, the government is 
closely watching international opinion, including the UN Security 
Council. Prime Minister Taro Aso indicated that he would make a 
decision based on UNSC discussions by saying to the press at his 
 
TOKYO 00001177  003 OF 011 
 
 
office, "It is proper to begin with discussions at the UNSC." 
 
The government intends to ask the UNSC for a new resolution on North 
Korea. Kawamura said: "It is unknown whether (the UNSC) will urge 
the North to abide by the resolutions adopted in the past or (adopt 
a resolution) on additional sanctions. No one can foretell what will 
happen." To conduct UNSC discussions at its advantage, Japan will 
hurry enhancing cooperation with countries concerned, such as the 
United States and South Korea. 
 
Kawamura indicated that the "situation is severe" regarding a 
possible impact on the Six-Party Talks by the North's nuclear test 
yesterday. There are calls in the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) for 
reinforced sanctions against the North if the Six-Party Talks cannot 
move forward immediately. 
 
In reaction to the North's launch in April of the Taepodong-2 
missile, the government decided to extend for one year the ban on 
port calls by North Korean vessels and the ban on imports from North 
Korea. At that time, the government studied a total ban as one 
option but decided to keep it in reserve to use it in reaction to 
another nuclear test by the North. 
 
According to Finance Ministry trade statistics, imports from North 
Korea have been zero since 2007 and the total amount of exports to 
that country was less than 800 million yen. Some think that an 
embargo by Japan alone would be ineffective, but a government source 
said that such could be a symbolic act to signify Japan's resolute 
stance against the North. 
 
3) Timing of nuclear test unexpected by government; DPRK warnings 
not seen as signs 
 
YOMIURI (Page 32) (Abridged) 
May 26, 2009 
 
North Korea fired three short-range missiles into the Sea of Japan 
right after its nuclear test on May 25. The DPRK had issued 
navigation warnings setting off-limits areas in the Sea of Japan up 
to May 30, and this information had been known to the relevant 
ministries. However, that the nuclear test and short-range missile 
launches would come almost simultaneously was unexpected. 
 
Japan Coast Guard (JCG) patrol boats, cruising the Sea of Japan, had 
caught the DPRK's navigation warnings on May 21 and 23. The 
off-limits areas were two sections northeast and east of the DPRK. 
By early evening of May 25, the JCG had also caught the navigation 
warning issued for the area around West Korea Bay. 
 
Navigation warnings are transmitted to ships sailing nearby via 
radio signals and are also issued during naval exercises, 
shipwrecks, marine accidents, and so forth. The JCG had informed the 
relevant ministries via the Prime Minister's Office Residence 
(Kantei) that North Korea might be making moves right after it 
caught the information. 
 
The Ministry of Defense (MOD) and the National Police Agency had 
been gathering information recently since North Korea had announced 
it would conduct a nuclear test on April 29 and the comings and 
goings of trucks had been observed since May in the vicinity of 
North Hamgyong Province, where the nuclear test took place. However, 
the navigation warnings were not seen as signs of a nuclear test 
 
TOKYO 00001177  004 OF 011 
 
 
based on the analysis that in order for North Korea to achieve 
direct negotiations with the U.S., "even if it conducts a nuclear 
test, it will have to adopt the diplomatic tactic of escalating the 
crisis level in stages," (according to a senior government 
official). 
 
For this reason, a senior MOD appeared to be surprised that "the 
test took place so quickly." At a regular news conference on the 
afternoon of May 25, although Vice Defense Minister Kohei Masuda 
said that he "does not feel" that the navigation warnings "are 
directly related to a nuclear test," he would only say "no comment" 
when asked if signs of such a test had been observed. 
 
4) North Korean engineers visited Iran 
 
SANKEI (Page 1) (Abridged) 
May 26, 2009 
 
A North Korean group of more than 50 nuclear and missile engineers, 
including operatives, visited Iran after North Korea launched a 
long-range ballistic missile on April 5, sources close to diplomacy 
between Japan and the United States revealed yesterday. In Iran, 
they secretly visited Natanz, where an underground nuclear facility 
is believed to be located. 
 
Their visit will draw attention in connection with North Korea's 
underground nuclear test. In addition, North Korea, which has so far 
pursued nuclear development for plutonium-type weapons, is believed 
to be aiming to acquire Iran's technical know-how for uranium 
enrichment centrifugation. 
 
According to the sources and others, North Korea invited more than 
10 Iranians, including military officers and scientists, at the time 
of its missile launch in April for technical exchanges on missile 
launch technologies. After that, North Korean engineers visited Iran 
and went to Natanz, the sources said. North Korea and Iran are said 
to have possibly exchanged technical information for nuclear 
development. 
 
Iran has so far denied involvement in technical cooperation with 
North Korea. 
 
5) North Korea conducts nuclear test 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full) 
May 26, 2009 
 
Hajime Izumi, professor at Shizuoka University (specialization in 
international relations and Korean Peninsula domestic and foreign 
policies): North Korea is aiming at normalizing relations with U.S. 
 
The aim of North Korea is not at the level of drawing the U.S. into 
negotiations but at urging the U.S. to abandon its hostile policy 
toward it and promote specific negotiations, such as those that 
normalize bilateral diplomatic ties. 
 
North Korea issued a declaration criticizing the UN Security 
Council's presidential statement condemning its ballistic missile 
launch the day after the statement was adopted. Such an 
unprecedentedly quick response might be evidence of its desire to 
pave the way for normalizing diplomatic relations with the U.S. by 
2012, which marks the 100th anniversary of the birth of chairman Kim 
 
TOKYO 00001177  005 OF 011 
 
 
Il Sung, and to establish the framework for the next regime. 
 
The North still has such bargaining chips as (1) more nuclear tests; 
(2) an increase in plutonium production; (3) enrichment of uranium; 
and (4) test firing of intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBM). 
If North Korea succeeds in producing a miniaturized warhead, Japan 
will be exposed to a grave threat. 
 
Japan, the U.S., China, and other countries will take a tougher 
stance toward the North following its latest nuclear test. I expect 
that the game of patience between these countries, which take the 
stance of waiting until North Korea returns to the Six-Party Talks, 
and North Korea, which might come up with more threats, will last at 
least six months. 
 
Hideshi Takesada, executive director of the National Institute for 
Defense Studies of the Defense Ministry: Kim regime gives priority 
to military logic 
 
North Korea conducted a nuclear test in a short period of time after 
launching a missile in April. It is speculated that the North is 
aiming at sending a stronger appeal to the international community, 
taking advantage of the combined effect of nuclear testing and 
missile launching. Its latest missile launch showed North Korea's 
success in developing a technology to extend its range. This fact is 
more serious than whether it succeeded in launching a satellite. 
North Korea is suspected of hoping to impress the international 
community with its success in producing a downsized nuclear weapon 
in order to upgrade its status as a nuclear power. 
 
It is certain that North Korea's nuclear test will upset China and 
cause the U.S. to refuse negotiations with the North for a short 
period of time. North Korea's nuclear test this time despite such 
circumstances indicates that the nation has given priority to 
military logic. North Korea's judgment is that it will possess its 
first nuclear deterrent for self-defense if it develops a missile 
with a range that covers Washington, the capital of the U.S. To that 
end, the North wants to succeed in producing a miniaturized 
warhead. 
 
It is impossible to read North Korea's intentions based on the logic 
of repeating diplomatic bargaining in order to secure the survival 
of its regime. The Kim regime's stance is to give priority to 
military affairs and to enjoy its by-products. It final goal is to 
remove intervention from the U.S. and attain South-North unification 
with the North taking advantage. 
 
6) U.S., China, Russia Condemn North Korea's Nuclear Test; UN 
Security Council Meets Today 
 
ASAHI (Top play) (Excerpts) 
May 26, 2009 
 
Kayo Matsushita, New York; Yusuke Murayama, Washington; Kengo 
Sakajiri, Beijing 
 
In light of North Korea's underground nuclear test, the UN Security 
Council (UNSC) will hold an emergency meeting at the UN headquarters 
in New York at 4:00 p.m. on May 25 (5:00 a.m. on May 26, Japan 
time). The key issue is whether a consensus can be reached on taking 
stern measures, including the imposition of additional sanctions, on 
North Korea. The responses of Russia, UNSC chair for May, and China, 
 
TOKYO 00001177  006 OF 011 
 
 
which chairs the Six-Party Talks, are drawing attention in 
particular. The U.S., China, and Russia all condemned the DPRK on 
May 25. 
 
Commentary: Shadow Cast on Obama's Vision of "No Nuclear Arms" 
 
Hirotsugu Mochizuki 
 
On April 5, the very day on which U.S. President Barack Obama made 
an appeal to the world for a "world free of nuclear weapons" in the 
Czech capital of Prague, North Korea went ahead and launched its 
ballistic missile. Just 50 days later, as if challenging Obama's 
message that "the path to security and respect will never come 
through threats and illegal weapons," the DPRK conducted its second 
nuclear test. 
 
The main difference between this test and the first test is the 
advent of the Obama administration in the U.S. It is believed that 
North Korea's purpose is to give a jolt to the six-month old U.S. 
administration and draw it into direct U.S.-DPRK talks outside the 
Six-Party Talks framework. Just like its first nuclear test in 2006 
during the previous Bush administration, this is regarded as a 
brinkmanship tactic using "threat" to gain the upper hand. 
 
However, this experiment may cast a dark shadow over concrete steps 
toward Obama's "no nuclear arms" vision. 
 
The two pillars of Obama's "no nuclear arms" plan are: (1) 
"vertical" disarmament between the two nuclear superpowers, the 
United States and Russia; and (2) "horizontal" nuclear 
non-proliferation through strengthening the Nuclear 
Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) and safeguarding nuclear materials. 
 
With regard to (1), negotiations for a sequel to the Strategic Arms 
Reduction Treaty I (START I) have resumed based on an agreement 
between the U.S. and Russian leaders in April. Working-level 
officials are also engaged in discussions in preparation for the 
next summit meeting in July. However, since U.S. allies under the 
protection of its "nuclear umbrella" are being confronted with North 
Korea's nuclear threat once again, the Obama administration will 
have less of a free hand in nuclear disarmament talks. 
 
As for (2), the main point is the United States' ratification of the 
Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), which prohibits nuclear 
experiments, to enable the treaty to take effect at an early date. 
In this issue, North Korea's blatant nuclear tests may serve to 
reinforce persistent doubts about the effectiveness of the CTBT in 
the U.S. 
 
For now, it is believed that the Obama administration will deal with 
North Korea sternly through the UNSC and other venues. However, like 
the Bush administration, which agreed to direct talks in the end and 
removed the DPRK from the list of state sponsors of terrorism, it is 
also very likely that it may not be able to pursue a tough stance 
single-mindedly. 
 
Meanwhile, North Korea is certain to become even more isolated with 
this nuclear test. For the Kim Jong Il regime, which is facing 
uncertainties over the succession of power internally, there are 
serious risks involved in persisting with an aggressive stance. It 
is inevitable that both the U.S. and the DPRK will eventually have 
to resume efforts to find a way to resolve the situation through 
 
TOKYO 00001177  007 OF 011 
 
 
"dialogue." 
 
Obama will face the dilemma of reconciling his position on a "world 
without nuclear weapons" and his philosophy of "willingness to 
engage in dialogue even with hostile countries." The diplomatic 
process of seeking "common ground" with North Korea will represent a 
major challenge in the long road to a world with no nuclear arms. 
 
7) Japan to ask other countries for their cooperation in adopting 
sanctions resolution 
 
NIKKEI (Page 1) (Abridged slightly) 
May 26, 2009 
 
Prime Minister Taro Aso placed a telephone call to South Korean 
President Lee Myung Bak and talked with him for about 15 minutes in 
the wake of the nuclear test by North Korea yesterday. Aso said to 
Lee: "(The nuclear test) is a grave challenge to the nuclear 
nonproliferation regime and a threat to the peace and stability of 
the international community. It is a clear violation of UN Security 
Council resolutions and is absolutely intolerable." Lee expressed a 
similar view, and the two agreed to deal severely with North Korea. 
 
Aso said to reporters, "Japan and South Korea must make close 
contacts and deal with the situation resolutely." The prime minister 
also indicated that Japan will ask the UN Security Council for a new 
resolution. 
 
Foreign Minister Hirofumi Nakasone held talks with his Chinese 
counterpart Yang Jiechi in Vietnam's Hanoi and asked for China's 
cooperation in adopting a sanctions resolution by the UN Security 
Council, "It is indispensable for the international community to 
clarify its will by adopting a resolution." 
 
Nakasone also spoke with U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on 
the telephone. The two agreed as a result to aim at a fresh UNSC 
resolution. Clinton emphatically said, "There will be consequences 
in reaction to North Korea's act, and the countries concerned must 
pull together and adopt a powerful resolution swiftly." 
 
8) Commentary: Worthiness of Six-Party Talks questioned 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Full) 
May 26, 2009 
 
Yasunobu Shirouchi, international news reporter 
 
North Korea has gone ahead with its second nuclear test. This 
country has repeatedly taken actions that violate the agreement 
reached at the Six-Party Talks. With this most recent nuclear test, 
the talks that started in August 2003 are back to square one. 
 
North Korea had promised to "abandon all nuclear weapons and 
existing nuclear programs" in the joint statement issued at the 
Six-Party Talks in September 2005. The participants had finally 
agreed on the disablement of nuclear facilities and the declaration 
of existing nuclear programs after various twists and turns. 
 
However, after the UN Security Council (UNSC) adopted a presidential 
statement condemning the DPRK's missile launches in April, this 
country announced its non-participation in the Six-Party Talks. In 
late April, it also disclosed the resumption of the reprocessing of 
 
TOKYO 00001177  008 OF 011 
 
 
spent nuclear fuel rods. 
 
By conducting its second nuclear test, North Korea has made clear 
its intention to proceed with the development of nuclear weapons. 
The test has made its nuclear declaration last year even less 
credible, and the Six-Party Talks agreement has turned out to be an 
illusion. 
 
The DPRK conducted missile launches and a nuclear test in 2006, 
which resulted in its seizing the initiative in bilateral talks with 
the U.S., which the latter had been unwilling to engage in. Its 
recent action is a result of its success last time. 
 
North Korea has been playing tough repeatedly. The manner in which 
the Six-Party Talks is being conducted, including its effectiveness, 
is now in question. 
 
9) U.S. asked Japan to introduce F-35 
 
MAINICHI (Page 1) (Abridged) 
May 24, 2009 
 
When Defense Minister Yasukazu Hamada visited the United States on 
May 1, he was asked by Secretary of Defense Gates to consider 
introducing the F-35 fighter as the follow-on mainstay fighter for 
the Air Self-Defense Force, sources revealed yesterday. In their 
meeting at that time, Gates explained that it would be difficult for 
the U.S. to export the F-22, a state-of-the-art stealth fighter jet 
that the Defense Ministry has considered to be the most likely 
candidate. Gates cited the Congress-imposed embargo as a reason. It 
will be difficult for the ASDF to introduce the F-22 now that the 
United States has strongly urged Japan to buy the F-35. 
 
The F-22 uses the world's highest-level stealth technology. The U.S. 
Congress, concerned about the outflow of such technology, has 
embargoed the F-22. Furthermore, in April, Gates announced that the 
Pentagon was planning to produce 187 F-22s and would stop the F-22 
production line afterward. Gages also said he would introduce the 
F-35, the newest stealth aircraft being currently co-developed with 
Britain and Australia, for U.S. forces. 
 
In a meeting at the White House, Gates briefed Hamada on the U.S. 
Congress' decision. Gates cited the F-35 and suggested Japan select 
it, according to the sources. Hamada said, "We would like to 
consider introducing aircraft that has trustworthy air defense 
capability." With this, Hamada indicated that the F-22 would remain 
on the list of candidates. However, the United States gives first 
consideration to military secrets. Most of the Defense Ministry 
deems it difficult to introduce the F-22, with one of them saying, 
"There's no doubt that it will be difficult to introduce the F-22." 
 
10) Gov't, ruling coalition mull easing Japan's arms embargo policy 
 
NIKKEI (Page 1) (Abridged) 
May 24, 2009 
 
The government and ruling parties will consider easing Japan's 
self-imposed three principles on arms exports, sources said 
yesterday. The National Defense Program Guidelines, which is 
expected to be revised late this year, will incorporate developing 
and producing weapons with foreign countries and lifting the ban on 
exports to co-developers. This is aimed at paving the way for Japan 
 
TOKYO 00001177  009 OF 011 
 
 
to participate in the joint development and production of mainstay 
equipment, such as the next-generation fighter jet being 
co-developed by the United States and its European partners, and is 
also aimed at holding down procurement costs and revitalizing the 
domestic defense industry. 
 
In 1967, then Prime Minister Sato announced the three principles of 
not exporting weapons to communist nations, countries against which 
the United Nations has taken sanctions, and conflict-ridden 
countries. In 1976, then Prime Minister Takeo Miki switched to a de 
facto "total ban on arms exports." Japan's embargo still continues, 
with the exception of such cases as its joint development of missile 
defense systems with the United States. 
 
The government and ruling parties will retract the "total ban on 
arms exports." Communist nations will be off the list of countries 
subject to the export ban. Instead, the list will include countries 
backing terrorists, countries abusing human rights, and countries 
failing to control exports and imports. The government will actually 
judge whether or not to export weapons, based on such factors as the 
possibility of transfer to other countries and the potential impact 
on regional security. 
 
The government will also review the scope of its export ban. Those 
that are currently under the export ban include production 
equipment, military trucks, and protective suits and gas masks "as 
weapons and the like." The government will remove them from the 
list, judging whether they have attack capabilities. 
 
11) Greenhouse gas emissions cut: Mid-term goal with focus on 7 
PERCENT  cut compared with 1990 level 
 
MAINICHI (Page 1) (Full) 
May 25, 2009 
 
The government on May 24 held a meeting of the Round Table on the 
Global Warming Issue, chaired by advisor to Toyota Motors Hiroshi 
Okuda, at the Kantei to discuss Japan's goal for cutting greenhouse 
gas emissions to be achieved by 2020 (mid-term goal). Environmental 
conservation groups, which are calling for a substantial cut, and 
business circles, which want to see a lenient goal, are squabbling 
over the six proposals made thus far. In polls, many respondents 
supported an intermediate goal of a 7 PERCENT  cut, compared with 
the 1990 level, or a 14 PERCENT  cut from the 2005 level. As such, 
the government is making adjustments based on this proposal. Prime 
Minister Taro Aso said, "The government will release a mid-term goal 
as early as the beginning of June." 
 
At the meeting, it was reported that in a poll targeting 4,000 
persons carried out between May 7 and 17, 45.4 PERCENT , the biggest 
group, chose a 7 PERCENT  cut, followed by 15.3 PERCENT  in favor of 
a 4 PERCENT  increase in comparison with the 1990 level (or a 4 
PERCENT  cut from the 2005 level) as supported by the Japan Business 
Federation, and 4.9 PERCENT  in favor of a 25 PERCENT  reduction 
from the 1990 level (or a 30 PERCENT  cut from the 2005 level) as 
sought by environmental organizations. 
 
Concerning matters that should be given priority in setting a 
mid-term goal, 36.3 PERCENT  chose "feasibility," followed by 
"impartiality in goals set by between Japan and other countries" 
cited by 29 PERCENT  of respondents and "contribution to efforts to 
prevent damage caused by global warming" by 25.9 PERCENT . 
 
TOKYO 00001177  010 OF 011 
 
 
Environment Minister Tetsuo Saito and Economic, Trade and Industry 
Minister Toshihiro Nikai will confer on the matter to look into how 
much the margin of the emissions cut can be increased, focusing on 
the 7 PERCENT  cut proposal. 
 
12) DPJ-backed candidate wins Saitama mayoral election 
 
NIKKEI (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
May 25, 2009 
 
The candidate backed by the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) won the 
Saitama mayoral election yesterday, beating five rivals including 
the incumbent backed by the ruling camp. This election was the first 
major local election after Yukio Hatoyama assumed the main 
opposition party's presidency. The victory has given the party's new 
leadership a boost toward the next House of Representatives 
election. Eyeing a number of local elections to be held until this 
summer, the ruling coalition has been extremely concerned. The 
outcomes of such local elections might affect the timetable for the 
next general election. 
 
Results of local elections might affect Lower House election 
 
DPJ Deputy President Naoto Kan said in an interview with the Nikkei 
last night: "Expectations of the DPJ have returned after the new 
Hatoyama leadership was launched." Election Strategy Committee 
Chairman Hirotaka Akamatsu also confidently said: "With the weight 
lifted from us, we can now move forward." 
 
Following the indictment of former party president Ichiro Ozawa's 
secretary for huge political donations from Nishimatsu Construction 
Co., DPJ-backed candidates were defeated in the Chiba and Akita 
gubernatorial elections. The party members feel that the effects of 
Ozawa's resignation have already surfaced. 
 
Hayato Shimizu, who won the election, was backed by just the DPJ's 
Saitama prefectural chapter, but the new leadership strongly 
supported him, as seen in Hatoyama's stumping tour for him just 
before the election date. In the previous Lower House election, the 
DPJ suffered losses in all the single seat constituencies. Bearing 
this bitter experience in mind, the main opposition party has taken 
the victory in the Saitama mayoral election as a favorable 
indication of the restoration of its popularity in cities that are 
home to many unaffiliated voters. 
 
Recent major local elections 
 
Chiba gubernatorial election (Mar. 29) X 
Akita gubernatorial election (April 12) X 
Nagoya mayoral election (April 26) O 
Saitama mayoral election (May 24) O 
 
O = victory of the DPJ- backed candidate 
X = defeat of the DPJ-backed candidate 
 
Future major local elections 
 
Chiba mayoral election (June 14) The LDP and Rengo endorse the 
former vice mayor, while the DPJ endorses an assembly member. 
Shizuoka gubernatorial election (July 5) The LDP has decided to 
endorse its Upper House member. The DPJ has made no decision. 
Hyogo gubernatorial election (July5) Prefectural assembly members of 
 
TOKYO 00001177  011 OF 011 
 
 
the LDP, the DPJ, and other political parties have decided to 
support the incumbent. 
Tokyo gubernatorial election (July 12) The LDP and the New Komeito 
aim to maintain the majority. 
Sendai mayoral election (July 26)  The focus is likely to be on the 
incumbent's municipal administration. 
 
13) BSE preventive measures: OIE to recognize safety of Japanese 
beef; Government considering easing inspection guidelines 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Full) 
May 25, 2009 
 
The World Organization for Animal Health (OIE), which is in charge 
of formulating guidelines for monitoring BSE, will likely recognize 
Japan as a country with a controlled risk of BSE at its opening 
plenary meeting on May 24, giving high marks to the safety of 
Japan's beef production. 
 
Once Japan receives the OIE certification, the government will start 
efforts to expand exports of domestic beef. It will also likely give 
full consideration to easing cattle subject to BSE inspection, 
judging that Japan's system of preventing BSE from occurring among 
young cows, including the introduction of a feed rule, has been 
recognized. Cattle aged 21 months or older are currently subject to 
such an inspection. 
 
Revisions to Japan's BSE inspection guidelines could spur the U.S. 
to further strengthen its pressure on Japan to further ease the 
guidelines, including the abolition of import restrictions. Since 
public distrust in food safety still remains deep-rooted, the 
government will likely search for a specific time frame for easing 
the guidelines in a cautious manner. 
 
According to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries 
(MAFF), the OIE categorizes BSE status of beef exporting countries, 
based on applications made by various countries. Japan made such an 
application in December 2008. The OIE assesses BSE status of beef 
exporting countries into three categories - "negligible risk of BSE" 
applicable to countries where no BSE cases have been confirmed, 
"controlled risk of BSE" for countries that have an appropriate BSE 
control system, such as the removal of specified risk materials 
(SRM), and undetermined risk of BSE. At present, 10 countries are 
recognized as a country with negligible risk of BSE and 31 
countries, including the U.S., as a country with controlled risk of 
BSE. Many countries recognized as a county with controlled risk of 
BSE subject cattle aged 30 months or older to SE inspection. 
 
Japan in 2001 for the first time confirmed 36 BSE infection cases. 
However, with measures, such as a ban on meat-and-bone meal that 
uses SRMs, such as brains and spinal cords, producing effect, the 
number of BSE infection cases dropped to 3 in 2007 and one in 2008 
and 2009. The OIE has decided to give the risk-controlled 
classification to Japan, giving high marks to its efforts. 
 
However, among about 20 nations that placed a ban on beef imports 
from Japan, only five countries, including Singapore, have resumed 
imports. 
 
ZUMWALT