Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09STATE52978, OSCE/FSC: 2009 U.S. SUBMISSION ON ANTI-PERSONNEL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09STATE52978.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09STATE52978 2009-05-22 19:50 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Secretary of State
VZCZCXRO1492
OO RUEHAST RUEHDBU RUEHFL RUEHLA RUEHMRE RUEHPOD RUEHROV RUEHSK RUEHSR
DE RUEHC #2978/01 1422005
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O P 221950Z MAY 09
FM SECSTATE WASHDC
TO RUEHVEN/USMISSION USOSCE IMMEDIATE 0753
INFO ORG FOR SECURITY CO OP IN EUR COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY 7737
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFISS/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/DTRA ALEX WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUESDT/DTRA-OSES DARMSTADT GE PRIORITY
RHMFISS/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDR USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE//ECJ5// PRIORITY
RHMFISS/CDRUSAREUR HEIDELBERG GE//POLAD// PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 STATE 052978 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OSCE PARM PREL
SUBJECT: OSCE/FSC:  2009 U.S. SUBMISSION ON ANTI-PERSONNEL 
LANDMINES 
 
1.  (U)  This is an action request. 
 
2.  (U)  In 2004 the Forum for Security Cooperation (FSC) 
agreed on FSC.DEC/7/04 on "Updating the OSCE Questionnaire on 
Anti-Personnel Mines and Explosive Remnants of War," which 
requested all participating States to submit their 
questionnaire responses to other participating States and the 
OSCE Conflict Prevention Center (CPC) by May 31 each year 
beginning in 2005. In accordance with this decision, 
Washington requests that Mission provide the following 
submission to the OSCE in the appropriate format.  Please 
note that there is an accompanying report, "Protocol on 
Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, 
Booby-Traps, and Other Devices," also known as the 2008 
Amended Protocol II report, which should be submitted along 
with the questionnaire responses. 
 
--Begin Submission-- 
 
 
2009 Submission of the United States of America for the OSCE 
Questionnaire on Anti-Personnel Mines 
 
Part I 
 
1. Is your country a State Party to the 1996 Amended Protocol 
II on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, 
Booby-Traps and Other Devices annexed to the 1980 Convention 
on Conventional Weapons (CCW)? 
 
Yes, the United States ratified Amended Protocol II in May 
1999. 
 
If yes: 
 
2.  Please attach the most recent annual report submitted by 
your country in accordance with Article 13 of the Amended 
Protocol or give the appropriate electronic address for the 
report. 
 
The United States submitted an Annual Report on November 10, 
2008. A copy is attached. 
 
If no: 
 
3. Is your country considering ratification/accession to The 
Amended Protocol II? 
 
Not applicable. 
 
4. What measures have been taken to prevent the 
indiscriminate use of mines, booby-traps and other devices? 
 
United States landmine policies and practices prohibit the 
indiscriminate use of all landmines (including APL), 
booby-traps, and other devices.  The United States requires 
recording and accounting for all mines placed, and planning 
for the removal of mines at the cessation of hostilities. 
The United States requires that all of its minefields be 
marked with internationally agreed upon signs and monitored 
by military personnel at all times.  All U.S. landmine 
related procedures, practices, regulations and systems meet 
or exceed the requirements of the CCW, Amended Protocol II. 
 
Reporting relative to minefields requires a detailed report 
of intention, a report of initiation, and a report of 
completion.  Reports of transfer (of control to another unit) 
and reports of change are required as transfers or changes 
occur.  Reports include the number and types of mines as well 
as their locations. 
 
Minefield locations are recorded on a standardized form. 
Hand emplaced mines are recorded individually. Scatterable 
munition fields are recorded by their perimeter. 
 
With respect to marking and fencing, munition fields that are 
placed behind the forward line of own troops (FLOT) are 
marked on all four sides.  Forward of the FLOT, minefields 
 
STATE 00052978  002 OF 005 
 
 
are not generally marked before emplacement. Commanders are 
instructed to make every attempt to mark these munition 
fields as soon as the tactical situation allows. 
 
The vast majority of U.S. mines have 
self-destruct/self-deactivation features.  After the year 
2010, the U.S. will no longer use persistent mines of any 
type, anti-personnel or anti-vehicle. 
 
5. Would your country be interested in receiving assistance 
related to the implementation of this Protocol? 
If so, please describe. 
 
No. 
 
6. Does your country have the capacity to assist others 
related to this Protocol? If so, please describe. 
 
The United States is a strong supporter of international 
humanitarian mine action efforts and mine action technology 
exchanges.  This highly successful program is but one 
component of the U.S. Government's robust Humanitarian Mine 
Action Program.  The Department of Defense, USAID, and 
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention also work to 
alleviate the humanitarian harm caused by the indiscriminate 
and illicit use of landmines. The U.S. was one of the first 
countries to support humanitarian mine action efforts, 
beginning in 1988 in Afghanistan.  Since then, the United 
States consistently has been the world's strongest financial 
supporter of humanitarian mine action, providing well over 
$1.4 billion dollars to 54 countries or territories.  U.S. 
efforts include support for mine clearance operations, mine 
risk education, survivors, assistance, research and 
development, training, and a public-private partnership 
program.  The United States is also a leader in the 
development and sharing of mine clearance technology, 
techniques, and information. 
 
The United States participates in a number of mine clearance 
information sharing partnerships such as International Test 
and Evaluation Program for Humanitarian Demining Equipment, 
Processes, and Methods and the U.S. Department of Defense has 
commissioned a number of ground-breaking mine clearance 
studies such as the 2002 International Pilot Project for 
Technology Cooperation report.  More information can be found 
at: 
 
- U.S. Department of State, Office of Weapons Removal and 
Abatement: www.state.gov/t/pm/wra 
- U.S. Department of Defense Humanitarian Demining Training 
Center: www.wood.army.mil/hdtc 
- U.S. Department of Defense Humanitarian Demining Research 
and Development Program: www.humanitarian-demining.org 
- U.S. Agency for International Development Patrick J. Leahy 
War Victims Fund: www.usaid.gov/ourwork/humanitarian 
assistance/the funds/lwvf/ 
 
Part II 
 
7. Has your country ratified or acceded to the 1997 
Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, 
Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on their 
Destruction? 
 
No. 
 
8.(a) If yes, please attach the most recent report submitted 
by your country in accordance with Article 7 of the 
Convention or give the appropriate electronic address for the 
report. 
 
Not applicable. 
 
(b)  If no, is your country considering 
ratification/accession to the Convention? 
 
No.  The terms of the Ottawa Convention were not reconciled 
with critical U.S. national interests; therefore the United 
States decided not to become a state party.  The United 
States is committed to reducing the humanitarian effects of 
anti-vehicle mines as well as anti-personnel mines. 
 
 
 
STATE 00052978  003 OF 005 
 
 
(c) Has your country adopted legislation to address the 
humanitarian objectives of the convention, or taken any 
specific measures regarding the use, production, storage, 
transfer and destruction of anti-personnel landmines? In case 
a moratorium has been introduced, what is its scope and 
duration and when was it introduced? 
 
United States policy on landmines aims to ensure protection 
for both military forces and civilians alike, and continues 
U.S. leadership in humanitarian mine action ) those 
activities that contribute most directly toward eliminating 
the landmine problem and mitigating its effects on landmine 
survivors. 
 
Further information about the United States policy may be 
found at: www.state.gov/t/pm/wra/c11735.htm 
 
The United States has appropriate laws in force to fulfill 
its obligations under the CCW Amended Mines Protocol.  Over 
the past two decades, the United States has converted its APL 
stockpile so that the overwhelming majority of its APL are 
self-destructing and self-deactivating types that meet or 
exceed CCW specifications for use outside marked and 
monitored minefields.  These self-destructing and 
self-deactivating types of APL do not pose the humanitarian 
concerns that persistent APL do. 
 
In 1996, the Department of Defense began the demilitarization 
and disposal of all stocks of non-self-destructing (NSD) APL 
except those needed for the defense of the Republic of Korea 
and training purposes.  By June 1998, the United States had 
met this goal, destroying approximately 3.3 million of its 
NSD APL. 
 
Additionally, the U.S. has an active program to develop 
alternatives to persistent anti-personnel landmines.  The 
programs will incorporate improvements to our 
self-destructing/self-deactivation technology to provide more 
operational flexibility while addressing humanitarian 
concerns. 
 
Since 1992, the United States has maintained legislation 
imposing a moratorium on the export and transfer of APL under 
the U.S. Arms Export Control Act or the Foreign Assistance 
Act.  On January 17, 1997, the United States announced that 
this moratorium would include the export and transfer of APL 
components and technology.  In December 2007, the U.S. 
Congress amended the law, which was to expire in 2008, 
extending the moratorium until October 23, 2014. 
 
9. Does your country have any specific measures in place to 
provide assistance to victims? 
 
The U.S. Humanitarian Mine Action Program has succeeded in 
helping to reduce the rate of landmine casualties, broaden 
the reach of mine awareness programs, increase the amount of 
land cleared and restored to productive use, accelerate the 
number of people returned to their homes and expand the 
number of landmine survivors receiving assistance. 
 
The Patrick J. Leahy War Victims Fund, managed by the U.S. 
Agency for International Development (USAID, has been in 
operation in post-conflict and conflict-affected developing 
countries since 1989.  The Fund was established to provide a 
dedicated source of financial and technical assistance for 
civilian victims of war who suffer from mobility-related 
injuries, including people who suffer from polio as a result 
of interrupted immunization services.  This includes, but is 
not limited to, mine and UXO survivors.  In the past decade, 
the Fund has devoted the majority of its resources to the 
establishment and improvement of accessible and appropriate 
prosthetic and orthotic services, including physical and 
occupational rehabilitation services.  In Fiscal Year 2008, 
the Fund contributed to or maintained support to projects in 
Afghanistan, Albania, Cambodia, Colombia, the Democratic 
Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Kenya, Laos, Lebanon, 
Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Uganda, and Vietnam, as 
well as various regional and global initiatives spanning 
multiple countries.  To date, the Fund has provided over 
US$150 million to more than 40 countries. 
 
10. Does your country require assistance in mine clearance, 
stockpile destruction, mine awareness and/or victim 
 
STATE 00052978  004 OF 005 
 
 
assistance? If so, please describe. 
 
No. 
 
11. Does your country have the capacity to assist others in 
mine action? If so, please describe. 
 
In Fiscal Year 2008, the United States provided humanitarian 
mine action assistance that totaled approximately $109 
million, including $13.8 million from USAID's Leahy War 
Victims Fund for survivor assistance.  Thirty mine-afflicted 
countries, on a total of four continents, benefited.  Fiscal 
Year 2009 funding is expected to be at a similar level.  The 
United States also notes that with our contributions for 
Fiscal Year 2008, total U.S. contributions to humanitarian 
mine action equal over $1.4 billion.  These funds have 
provided assistance in 61 countries. 
 
Since 1998, the United States has supported the Slovenian 
International Trust Fund (ITF) for Demining and Mine Victims 
Assistance.  To date, the ITF has raised over $270 million 
for humanitarian mine action and victim assistance in the 
Balkans and the Caucasus from over 100 donors, including 
United States matching donations of $113.5 million and more 
than $10.6 million in USG unilateral donations, which 
addressed specific urgent requirements. 
 
The U.S. Humanitarian Mine Action Program assists countries 
that are experiencing the adverse effects of uncleared 
persistent landmines, both anti-personnel and anti-vehicle, 
regardless of the affected countries, stances on either of 
the international landmine treaties.  Consistent with the 
U.S. philosophy of helping other countries to develop the 
indigenous capacity to demine, the U.S. program also aids in 
the development of leadership and organizational skills of 
local personnel to sustain programs after U.S.-provided 
training is complete. 
 
In addition to the resources provided to the Humanitarian 
Mine Action Program, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 
dedicated over $1.5 billion for the destruction, safe 
storage, or demilitarization of explosive remnants of war in 
Iraq. 
 
The United States supports the consortium of international 
NGOs working to produce standardized socio-economic landmine 
impact surveys for a dozen heavily-mined countries.  These 
impact surveys provide a framework for planning and 
prioritizing new strategies, minimizing the impact of 
landmines, and establishing criteria for measuring the 
success of mine action projects. 
 
The United States also actively encourages private sector 
support for humanitarian mine action through the development 
of a network of public-private partnerships, which currently 
numbers over 60.  These public-private partners work in 
concert with the U.S. Humanitarian Mine Action Program to 
support one or more aspects of mine action: clearance, mine 
risk education, and/or survivor assistance.  A positive side 
effect of this unique partnership initiative is to raise U.S. 
public interest in and support for humanitarian mine action. 
 
In addition, the United States is a member of the Mine Action 
Support Group (MASG).  The MASG is a group of donor states 
that focuses on increasing the effectiveness of all 
assistance for mine action. 
 
2009 Submission of the United States of America to the OSCE 
Questionnaire on Explosive Remnants of War 
 
To be submitted on a voluntary basis along with the OSCE 
Questionnaire on Anti-personnel Mines. 
 
1. Has your country notified the Depositary of its consent to 
be bound by the 2003 CCW Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of 
War (ERW) once it enters into force? Is your country 
considering doing so? 
 
The United States deposited its instrument of ratification 
for the 2003 CCW Protocol V on ERW at the UN on January 21, 
2009. 
 
2. If yes, at what stage is the process? 
 
STATE 00052978  005 OF 005 
 
 
Instrument of ratification deposited. 
 
3. Would your country be interested in receiving assistance 
in clearing or otherwise minimizing the risks and effects of 
ERW? If so, please describe. 
 
No. 
 
4. Does your country have the capacity to assist others in 
clearing and minimizing the risks and effects of ERW? If so, 
please describe. 
 
The United States takes a comprehensive approach to dealing 
with post-conflict hazards and therefore provides support for 
clearing ERW through both its Humanitarian Mine Action and 
Small Arms and Light Weapons (SA/LW) Destruction Programs. 
The U.S. program in Laos is a good example of a humanitarian 
mine action program where the focus is more on ERW 
(specifically, unexploded ordnance) than landmines. (Please 
refer to the U.S. APL questionnaire for more information.) 
 
In addition to funding the destruction of excess and obsolete 
SA/LW and munitions from national holdings, the SA/LW 
Destruction program also funds the clearance of weapons 
caches left at the end of conflicts primarily in Sudan and 
Afghanistan.  The SA/LW program is funded at approximately 
$44 million for U.S. Fiscal Year 2008; over a 270% increase 
from FY 2007 funding. 
 
In Iraq, the U.S. military has provided bomb strike 
information to clearance NGOs through the Mine and Explosive 
Ordnance Information Coordination Center. 
 
In 2008, the U.S. State Department established a Quick 
Reaction Force (QRF) for conventional weapons destruction, 
giving the Department the capability to respond globally to 
urgent humanitarian crises that require the removal or 
mitigation of explosive hazards to protect civilian 
populations.  The QRF recently completed clean-up operations 
in Chelopechene, Bulgaria, the site of a massive accidental 
depot explosion in July 2008. The QRF safely cleared more 
than 38,000 square meters and removed more than 110,000 
pieces of unexploded ordnance that threatened civilian 
populations. 
 
After the cessation hostilities between Russia and Georgia in 
August 2008, PM/WRA provided the HALO Trust with an 
"Emergency Survey and Response Capacity" grant worth an 
estimated $3.7 million.  In addition, PM/WRA provided the 
Information Management and Mine Action Programs (iMMAP) NGO 
$1,500,000 to establish an ERW coordination capacity for 
coordination of all ERW clearance operations. 
 
 
--End Submission-- 
CLINTON