Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BRASILIA679, BRAZILIAN FOREIGN MINISTER - AND POSSIBLE CANDIDATE FOR IAEA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BRASILIA679.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BRASILIA679 2009-05-28 20:04 2011-07-11 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN Embassy Brasilia
VZCZCXRO5270
RR RUEHRG
DE RUEHBR #0679/01 1482004
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 282004Z MAY 09
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4406
INFO RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 4133
RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 7798
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 9594
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0149
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 02 BRASILIA 000679 
 
NOFORN 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: 05/20/19 
TAGS: PREL ENRG ETTC EPET EINV KNNP IAEA IR BR
SUBJECT: BRAZILIAN FOREIGN MINISTER - AND POSSIBLE CANDIDATE FOR IAEA 
DIRECTOR GENERAL - ON IRAN 
 
REF:  A) BRASILIA 304, B) RIO DE JANEIRO 52, 
C) BRASILIA 667 
 
Classified by: Charge d'Affaires Lisa Kubiske. Reason 1.4a and b 
 
1.  (C) SUMMARY:  There have been press reports that Brazil's 
Minister for Exterior Relations Celso Amorim wants to be a candidate 
to become the next Director General of the International Atomic 
Energy Agency (IAEA).  Although Amorim has denied any interest in the 
IAEA job, the persistence of the reports and their likely origin 
within the MRE indicate that he should be viewed as a potential 
candidate should any of the present candidates fail to gain 
sufficient votes.  Given the prominent role the IAEA plays in trying 
to learn more about Iran's nuclear program and deter nuclear 
proliferation, Post has collected highlights of Amorim's recent 
actions and public statements about Iran.  In brief, Amorim has 
welcomed closer ties between Brazil and Iran, but has not openly 
embraced Iran's activities or views.  END SUMMARY. 
 
2.  (C) In November of 2008, Minister Celso Amorim of the Brazilian 
Ministry of Exterior Relations (MRE) traveled to Tehran to meet with 
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.  This marked the first time in 
17 years that a Brazilian senior diplomat had been to the country. 
While in Iran, Amorim and Ahmadinejad closed several bilateral 
commercial agreements between the two countries.  Moreover, Amorim 
proposed a visit by the Iranian president to Brazil in 2009.  The two 
sides also reportedly discussed nuclear issues during the visit. 
Amorim commented that "Brazil recognizes that all countries have the 
right to develop nuclear programs for pacific means," a common 
refrain from Brazilian officials when discussing Iran's nuclear 
program. 
 
3.  (C) Pursuant to Amorim's invitation, Ahmadinejad had planned to 
lead a delegation to Brazil in May.  However, the trip was postponed 
at the last minute.  A day after Ahmadinejad made controversial 
remarks at the United Nations World Conference on Racism in Geneva on 
April 20, 2009 regarding Israel and the Holocaust, the MRE released a 
note criticizing his comments.  Despite the MRE's criticism, Amorim 
had continued to affirm that Brazil's desire to cooperate with Iran 
and his continued support for Ahmadinejad's trip to Brazil.  In an 
interview with the press shortly after the United Nations conference, 
Amorim explained his reasons.  He said that Brazil must engage in a 
dialogue with Iran because it is a country with a large population, 
economic wealth, and "history."  He explained that meeting with Iran 
"doesn't keep us from expressing an opinion.  [The MRE] issued a 
statement which [was published] on our position (censoring 
Ahmadinejad's statements on the Holocaust).  That is not going to 
keep us from cooperating, nor from saying what we think."  Amorim 
said he considers Iran a key component to creating and maintaining 
peace in the Middle East, and would like to see more western 
involvement with the country.  In addition, he noted that President 
Obama has also expressed what Amorim believed was a similar desire to 
open a dialogue with Iran. 
 
4.  (C) The day before Ahmadinejad was scheduled to leave on a tour 
of several South American countries, starting in Brazil, he postponed 
the trip without providing any specific reasons.  In the days leading 
up to the suspended visit, the Israeli Government had formally 
complained to the Brazilian Ambassador in Israel about Ahmadinejad's 
upcoming visit to Brazil.  Further, several hundred Brazilians held 
protests in plazas in the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro. 
The Brazilian Minister on Human Rights, Paulo Vannuchi, came out 
shortly after the postponement to express his relief.   In interviews 
with the press, Vannuchi stated that "questioning the Holocaust is a 
grave problem . . . and as the Minister on Human Rights, I cannot 
adopt the attitude of thinking that this is not a problem," and 
affirmed that he would recommend to Amorim that Brazil in no way 
accept Ahmadinejad's proclamation. 
 
5.  (C) Despite the postponement, Amorim continues to affirm that 
both the Brazilian and Iranian governments are on good terms and that 
he continues to welcome a visit to Brazil by the Iranian President. 
In public remarks following the suspension of the trip, Amorim 
explained, "we don't talk with just the countries we agree with.  . . 
.  We do not agree with some of [President Ahmadinejad's] opinions. 
We've already said that, and we don't need to repeat it . . . but 
that should not impede us from forming a dialogue because we cannot 
talk to only those with whom we agree, that isn't a dialogue; it is a 
monologue."  Amorim stated that Brazil would like to maintain a 
dialogue between their government and that of Iran, and that Brazil 
welcomes a visit by Ahmadinejad or whoever might replace him after 
the June 12 elections in Iran. 
 
6.  (C) COMMENT.  Brazil's intent in seeking closer relations with 
Iran is driven by the broad objectives of President Lula's foreign 
policy: to cultivate a major regional economic and political player, 
 
BRASILIA 00000679  002 OF 002 
 
 
as it has also done for example with South Africa, Turkey, and Egypt, 
with a particular interest in boosting exports, but also with an eye 
toward increasing its own perceived standing as a global political 
player that "can talk to all sides."  Amorim's predisposition to 
dialogue with Iran, North Korea and other non-democratic states has 
been a cornerstone of Brazil's foreign policy during his tenure. 
However, Brazil is also careful to adhere to UN sanctions regimes, 
and its reaction to the recent DPRK nuclear test (REFTEL C) 
demonstrates that it takes these issues seriously.  Indications are 
that he would attempt to follow the same principles if he were to 
become head of the IAEA.  MRE sources have been quoted in the press 
stating that they believe Amorim's good relations with Iran and the 
United States would be to his advantage in the IAEA context. 
Amorim's affirmation of Iran's "right" to nuclear energy (paralleling 
the right claimed by Brazil in its Defense Strategy), without 
mentioning Iran's non-compliance with its IAEA obligations could, 
however, raise objections to an Amorim candidacy among IAEA members. 
 
KUBISKE