Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BEIJING1376, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS, U.S. POLICY, A/H1N1

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BEIJING1376.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BEIJING1376 2009-05-21 08:03 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Beijing
VZCZCXRO9725
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH RUEHVC
DE RUEHBJ #1376 1410803
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 210803Z MAY 09 ZDK
FM AMEMBASSY BEIJING
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 4099
INFO RUEHOO/CHINA POSTS COLLECTIVE
RHMFIUU/CDR USPACOM HONOLULU HI
UNCLAS BEIJING 001376 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/CM, EAP/PA, EAP/PD, C 
HQ PACOM FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR (J007) 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR CH PREL ECON
 
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS, U.S. POLICY, A/H1N1 
 
-------------------- 
  Editorial Quotes 
-------------------- 
 
1. U.S.-CHINA RELATIONS 
 
"Hacking military computers 'not a hack job'" 
 
The official English-language newspaper China Daily (05/21): "There 
is no way hackers - including those from China - can access 
top-secret data by penetrating the firewalls of military or 
government networks.  The US military is picking on China because it 
wants to make its claims appear more plausible.  The Former Director 
of [China's] National Computer Network Emergency Response Team said 
that there is no scientific basis to blame either China's military 
or the government for hacking other nations' networks because most 
of them are "out of reach."  The foreign media, quoting insiders in 
overseas intelligence services, have recently claimed that hackers, 
who appeared to be based in China, had repeatedly infiltrated 
military networks and government computers in more than 100 
countries. "If there had been cases of key intelligence being 
stolen, I believe there would have been undercover agents within the 
organizations facilitating the theft.  You cannot simply do it with 
computer technology," he said." 
 
2. U.S. POLICY 
 
"Stop the duplicity and give China a break" 
 
The official English-language newspaper China Daily (05/21): "The 
term "group of two" or (G2, that is, the U.S. and China) is the 
subject of debate because the two countries have the greatest 
influence on international affairs, and have the ability to help the 
world emerge out of the economic crisis. But the aspects that 
deserve greater attention are the responsibility the two countries 
show in facing global threats, presenting ideals, and leading the 
rest of the world pursuing those ideals.  What Obama means by a 
nuclear-free world is a peaceful and safe world. Hu's goal is clear: 
long term peace and common prosperity. To realize their goals, the 
two countries have to communicate and cooperate to the maximum 
level, for if they fail to do so, their ideas will prove to be 
utopian.  We need mutual respect, have to treat each other as 
equals, and respect the right of a nation to choose its social 
system and development mode. In short, countries should be 
"harmonious but different". 
 
3. A/H1N1 
 
"Transparency key to anti-virus battle" 
 
Global Times English (English-language daily published by the 
People's Daily) (05/21): "According to foreign reports, under 
pressure from Japan, Britain, China and other nations, the World 
Health Organization (WHO) decided not to raise the alert level from 
the current phase 5 to phase 6, which would mean a global outbreak 
is " imminent. "  One of our reporters contacted China's Ministry of 
Health hoping to confirm the story but was rebuffed by an official. 
Why aren't official departments more open on releasing this 
information?  Why can't the Chinese people learn critical 
information from the Chinese media?  Why must Chinese media receive 
such information from the foreign media rather than from our own 
government?  But as efforts to contain the virus drag on, Chinese 
people need more details, both about domestic and international 
developments.  Providing a greater level of transparency on 
information critical to the welfare of citizens goes a long way in 
building social stability and mutual trust between governments and 
the people in any country.  In China, we need such mutual trust to 
help us overcome the H1N1 virus." 
 
WEINSTEIN