Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09TELAVIV818, ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09TELAVIV818.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09TELAVIV818 2009-04-07 10:47 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tel Aviv
VZCZCXYZ0007
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTV #0818/01 0971047
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 071047Z APR 09
FM AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE ASHDC PRIORITY 1334
RHEHAAA/WHITE HOUSE WASHDC PIORITY
RHEHNSC/WHITE HOUSE NSC WASHDC PRIORITY
UEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDCPRIORITY
RUEAHQA/HQ USAF WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEADWD/DA WASHDC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/CNO WASHINGTN DC PRIORITY
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEHAD/AMEMBASSY ABU DHABI PRIORITY 5253
RUEHAS/AMEMBASSY ALGIERS PRIORITY 1846
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN PRIORITY 5764
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA PRIORITY 6065
RUEHLB/AMEMBASSY BEIRUT PRIORITY 5292
RUEHEG/AMEMBASSY CAIRO PRIORITY 3811
RUEHDM/AMEMBASSY DAMASCUS PRIORITY 6106
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON PRIORITY 2919
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1128
RUEHRB/AMEMBASSY RABAT PRIORITY 9835
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 7340
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH PRIORITY 2304
RUEHTU/AMEMBASSY TUNIS PRIORITY 6338
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY 8381
RUEHJI/AMCONSUL JEDDAH PRIORITY 1165
RUEHJM/AMCONSUL JERUSALEM PRIORITY 1794
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL PRIORITY
RHMFISS/COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/COMSIXTHFLT  PRIORITY
UNCLAS TEL AVIV 000818 
 
STATE FOR NEA, NEA/IPA, NEA/PPD 
 
WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE, SIT ROOM 
NSC FOR NEA STAFF 
 
SECDEF WASHDC FOR USDP/ASD-PA/ASD-ISA 
HQ USAF FOR XOXX 
DA WASHDC FOR SASA 
JOINT STAFF WASHDC FOR PA 
CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL FOR POLAD/USIA ADVISOR 
COMSOCEUR VAIHINGEN GE FOR PAO/POLAD 
COMSIXTHFLT FOR 019 
 
JERUSALEM ALSO ICD 
LONDON ALSO FOR HKANONA AND POL 
PARIS ALSO FOR POL 
ROME FOR MFO 
 
SIPDIS 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR IS
 
SUBJECT: ISRAEL MEDIA REACTION 
 
-------------------------------- 
SUBJECTS COVERED IN THIS REPORT: 
-------------------------------- 
 
President ObamaQs Mideast Remarks in Turkey 
 
------------------------- 
Key stories in the media: 
------------------------- 
 
The media reported and commented on President ObamaQs remarks in 
Ankara: Orly Azolai and other Yediot commentators as well as Maya 
Bengal of Maariv and colleagues and analysts from other media, opine 
that Obama sent a clear message from Ankara to FM Avigdor Lieberman: 
QThe U.S. strongly supports the goal of two states,Q Obama was 
quoted as saying.  Makor Rishon-Hatzofe highlighted what it says was 
ObamaQs call on Israel to make concessions to the Palestinians in 
order to form a front vis-`-vis Iran.  Professor Avraham Ben-Zvi 
commented in Israel Hayom that this might herald the beginning of a 
more soured American-Israeli relationship in order to facilitate 
improved relations between the United States and the Muslim world. 
The Jerusalem Post quoted Environmental Protection Minister (Likud), 
Gilad Erdan, as saying: QIsrael does not take orders from Obama. 
 
HaQaretz reported that an American official told the newspaper over 
the weekend that Obama does not oppose the inclusion of Hamas in a 
Palestinian unity government as long as Hamas agrees to the criteria 
and preconditions set by the Quartet.  According to HaQaretz, the 
Americans also ask that Palestinian PM Salam Fayyad return to head 
the next Palestinian government and be responsible for the PA's 
finances.  A Palestinian source told HaQaretz yesterday that in the 
coming days PA President Mahmoud Abbas is likely to ask Fayyad to 
form a new government, without the participation of Hamas. 
 
HaQaretz and Israeli TV reported on a possible June visit to Israel 
and the PA by President Obama.   HaQaretz and Israel Radio also 
reported that U.S. special envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell 
will arrive in Israel on Monday. 
 
Palestinian sources were quoted as saying in an interview with 
Maariv that PA President Mahmoud Abbas refuses to meet with PM 
Benjamin Netanyahu until Israel freezes all settlement construction 
and recognizes all agreements it is a signatory of, and the 
two-state solution. 
 
The Jerusalem Post reported that senior defense officials have told 
the newspaper that Israel fears that Hamas is working to build 
unprecedentedly large tunnels along the Philadelphi Corridor that 
will be used to smuggle long-range rockets into Gaza in one piece. 
 
Leading media reported that last night Egyptian President Hosni 
Mubarak called Netanyahu to congratulate him over the formation of 
his government and invite him to a meeting in Sharm el-Sheikh. 
 
Leading media reported that, ten months after the bulldozer terror 
attack in Jerusalem in which three Israelis were killed, police and 
army forces are now demolishing the apartment of the attacker in Sur 
Bahar, East Jerusalem.  Israel Radio reported that a Palestinian who 
attempted to run over members of the security forces at the spot 
slightly wounded three policemen and was shot and killed by a border 
policeman. 
 
Leading media reported that EU special envoy Marc Otte, unfazed by 
the policy review currently under way in the new Netanyahu 
government and comments by Lieberman against the Annapolis process, 
recommended patience, saying the new government had been in power 
less than a week. 
 
The Jerusalem Post reported that Defense Secretary Robert Gates 
announced yesterday that the Pentagon plans to end production of the 
F-22 Raptor, a top-of-the-line stealth aircraft that Israel has long 
coveted.  At the same time, Gates said he would nearly double the 
allocation to $11.2 billion for the F-35 Lightning II, another 
stealth plane that Israel would like to acquire, as part of a budget 
plan he will be taking to President Obama.  Obama is expected to 
review the budget and submit his own version for Congressional 
approval in early May.  Gates' announcement, part of what he termed 
a holistic strategic shift in the Defense Department's priorities, 
decreases the likelihood that Israel would ever be able to obtain 
the F-22, foreign sales of which are currently banned by Congress. 
Some Israeli defense officials are hoping that the end of U.S. 
orders for the plane will provide enough pressure that Congress -- 
which doesn't want to lose the thousands of jobs that the airplane's 
production provides -- will reverse the ban on foreign exports. 
However, The Jerusalem Post quoted Andrew Krepinevich of the Center 
for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments as saying that while 
Lockheed Martin would be sure to make that argument, he would expect 
that with the US ending its program, the jet manufacturer would 
start to shut down production. 
The Jerusalem Post reported that Danny Zamir, the head of the Rabin 
Pre-Military Academy in Kiryat Tivon, told the daily yesterday that 
Operation Cast Lead was completely justified, that isolated acts of 
vandalism do not make the IDF an army of war criminals, and that 
religious graduates of the military preparatory programs add to the 
morality of the IDF.  The Jerusalem Post and other media reported 
that IDF reservists have asked Attorney-General Menachem Mazuz to 
launch a criminal investigation against HaQaretz for publishing 
"testimonies" by soldiers of alleged misconduct and serious human 
rights violations during Operation Cast Lead in the Gaza Strip 
earlier this year.  The Jerusalem Post quoted Israeli and 
Palestinian human rights groups as saying yesterday that they had 
collected evidence hat Israeli troops attacked Palestinian medical 
workers and delayed the evacuation of wounded people during the 
recent offensive in Gaza.  The Jerusalem Post reported that Dr. 
Izzeldin Abuelaish, a physician, three of whose daughters were 
accidentally killed by the IDF during the operation, was nominated 
for the Nobel Peace Prize. 
 
Israel Radio reported that this morning Israel successfully tested 
an improved version of the Arrow anti-missile system. 
 
Mako.co.il, a Web site associated with Channel 2-TV, reported that a 
new play in Gaza casts Jews as drinking Muslim blood. 
 
Israel Radio reported that this morning the Knesset voted to allow 
the government to present a two-year budget.  The Jerusalem Post and 
others quoted opponents as saying that the plan constitutes a Qpower 
grab. 
 
All media devoted considerable space to the earthquake in central 
Italy, where an Israeli-Arab medical student is missing. 
 
-------------------------------------------- 
President ObamaQs Mideast Remarks in Turkey: 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
Summary: 
-------- 
 
The independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized: QIntense 
American involvement in solving the conflict ... will compel the 
Israeli government, the Palestinians and the Syrians to decide if 
they share Obama's vision or if they prefer to take the road of 
confrontation with the United States. 
 
Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in Ha'aretz: QThe 
Democratic President did not only publicly adopt the documents 
entirely associated with the Bush administration, he promised to 
breathe life into them during his tenure at the White House. 
 
Washington correspondent Orly Azolai and other wrote in the 
mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot: QObama was ... obliged 
to cite Annapolis because of the storm that Foreign Minister 
Lieberman stirred up with his statements. 
 
Diplomatic correspondent Aluf Benn wrote in the independent, 
left-leaning Ha'aretz: Q[President Obama believes that] the 
government change in Israel does not free it of its Bush-era 
commitment in the Annapolis declaration and Roadmap. 
 
Diplomatic correspondent Maya Bengal and others wrote in the 
popular, pluralist Maariv: QThe great question that diplomatic 
sources asked was whether Israel and the United States will enter a 
confrontational track given the gaps regarding the road leading to 
the resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 
 
Visiting Professor of Political Science at Haifa University Avraham 
Ben-Zvi, an expert in U.S.-Israeli relations, wrote in the 
independent Israel Hayom: QOne cannot fail to ask whether the 
explicit mention of the Annapolis understandings heralds the 
beginning of a negative approach to Israel. 
 
 
 
 
 
Block Quotes: 
------------- 
 
I.  "A Clear Message from Obama" 
 
The independent, left-leaning Ha'aretz editorialized (4/7): QThe 
clear, unequivocal American message delivered from Turkey, the first 
Muslim state [that President Obama] visited, was aimed at all Arab 
and Islamic countries no less than Israel.  The message was one of 
conciliation, understanding, appreciation and a sincere desire for 
cooperation, not just with America's friends in the region but also 
with Iran, whom Obama invited Qto take its rightful place in the 
community of nationsQ.... This is a change that Israel must 
internalize, and it could not have come at a better time, just after 
the formation of Benjamin Netanyahu's new government.  On the podium 
in Ankara, Obama, who committed to protect Israel's security, made 
clear his views on this security when he declared: QThe United 
States strongly supports the goal of two states, Israel and 
Palestine, living side by side in peace and securityQ.... These 
messages now await implementation.  Intense American involvement in 
solving the conflict, based on principles already enunciated, will 
compel the Israeli government, the Palestinians and the Syrians to 
decide if they share Obama's vision or if they prefer to take the 
road of confrontation with the United States. 
 
II.  "Obama Signals to Lieberman" 
 
Washington correspondent Orly Azolai and other wrote in the 
mass-circulation, pluralist Yediot Aharonot (4/7): QUntil now, 
President Obama and his special envoy, George Mitchell, have 
refrained from citing the Annapolis conference, which symbolized the 
legacy of President Bush and his Secretary of State, Condoleezza 
Rice, and instead focused on the two-state vision.  Obama was now 
obliged to cite Annapolis because of the storm that Foreign Minister 
Lieberman stirred up with his statements.  Indeed, Obama's 
statements were perceived around the world as the American response 
to Lieberman's inaugural speech.  Foreign Minister Lieberman 
personally refused to respond to President Obama's statement.  But, 
in closed conversations he said that he was unwilling to accept the 
Annapolis process and was only prepared to recognize the Roadmap. 
He said that while he had been opposed to the Roadmap, once the 
agreement was accepted by Israel he was bound to uphold it.  People 
in Lieberman's circle also said: QObama underscored that that the 
two-state vision was agreed to both in the Roadmap and at Annapolis, 
but that doesn't mean that he's in favor of Annapolis as a route or 
a course.  We have no problem with the two-state objective. 
 
III.  "Breathing Life into BushQs Vision" 
 
Senior op-ed writer Akiva Eldar commented in Ha'aretz (4/7): QThe 
Democratic President did not only publicly adopt the documents 
entirely associated with the Bush administration, he promised to 
breathe life into them during his tenure at the White House.  We can 
assume Obama knows that Bush promised to fulfill the vision of two 
states for two peoples while he was president.  Perhaps this is why 
Obama announced that what Bush considered a vision, he considers a 
realistic goal.  While Bush blended the Arab peace initiative into 
the road map, to throw Saudi Arabia a bone, Obama is making it one 
of the pillars of his Middle East policy. 
 
IV.  "Speeches Make It Clear: Palestine First" 
 
Diplomatic correspondent Aluf Benn wrote in the independent, 
left-leaning Ha'aretz (4/7): QObama conveyed four messages to 
Netanyahu in his address in the Turkish parliament: Don't waste my 
time trying to revoke the Qtwo-state solutionQ and replace it with a 
new vision that would not include an independent Palestinian state 
beside Israel.... The government change in Israel does not free it 
of its Bush-era commitment in the Annapolis declaration and Roadmap 
-- a Palestinian state with territorial contiguity in the West Bank, 
freezing settlements and evacuating outposts, economic and security 
assistance to the Palestinian Authority and continuous negotiations 
on all core issues.... Israeli officials noticed that Obama's people 
didn't mention the Annapolis process and interpreted this as the 
burial of Bush and Condoleezza Rice's ideas.... The president said 
this interpretation was unacceptable and that the Annapolis 
declaration was alive and well. 
 
V.  QObama: IQll Validate Annapolis 
 
Diplomatic correspondent Maya Bengal and others wrote in the 
popular, pluralist Maariv (4/7): QYesterday U.S. President Barack 
Obama conveyed a sharp signal to Israel during his visit to Turkey. 
It implied that no matter what statements come out from Israel, the 
U.S. will act to promote the solution of two states for two peoples. 
 The great question that diplomatic sources asked was whether Israel 
and the United States will enter a confrontational track given the 
gaps regarding the road leading to the resolution of the 
Israeli-Palestinian conflict.  Foreign Minister Avigdor LiebermanQs 
pronouncements and the fact that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu 
has made no statement so far that he is committed to a two-state 
solution annoy the White House. 
 
VI.  QIsrael Is Liable to Pay 
 
Visiting Professor of Political Science at Haifa University Avraham 
Ben-Zvi, an expert in U.S.-Israeli relations, wrote in the 
independent Israel Hayom (4/7): QThe central message that emerges 
from [President Barack ObamaQs] multiple statements [in Ankara] is 
that it is his aspiration to turn over a new leaf in relations 
between the United States and Islam and, by so doing, to replace the 
narrow strategic vantage point of the Bush administration with a 
broader and more conciliatory approach.  This new approach is based 
on the President's desire to build a bridge of understanding as well 
as cultural, economic and political cooperation with the Muslim 
world on the basis of respect, empathy, and tolerance.  Obama 
envisions Turkey as serving as that bridge.  Among others, the fact 
that Turkey has direct lines of dialogue with Syria and the various 
Palestinian factions is of great significance to Obama.  In his 
eagerness to enlist Ankara as a central mediator between the West 
and Islam, Obama is prepared to cross a number of red lines.  Even 
though Obama did not deviate from the well-known American position 
in his speech before the Turkish parliament, one cannot fail to ask 
whether the explicit mention of the Annapolis understandings heralds 
the beginning of a negative approach to Israel.  The coming weeks 
and months will prove whether Israel, the traditional ally, will be 
the one that is obliged the pay the cost of laying down these tracks 
to Ankara, Damascus, Ramallah and Gaza. 
 
CUNNINGHAM